Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan (1)

artnoir (17) 08-20-10  07:40pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - A fantastic array of beautiful girls
- Very detailed and "up-front" photos
- High quality vids, offered in three different formats; 1280x720 HD DivX, 1280x720 HD MP4, 1920x1080 HD WM
- Older models have their videos remastered and published
- Director's blog - you can read and find out what's going behind the scenes and grab some exclusive vid's or photo shoots
- Lots of mqsturbation and self-toying action
- Their castings are featured on video, and photos /w commentary
Cons: - The website design. I've been a member three times, and it hasn't changed much from when I first joined in 2002.
- No search function
- Too much fisting for my taste
- Too much focus on "perfect breasts and no tattoos", come on, let in a girl that have some personality and quirky feautres.
- ALS hasn't published all videos of their older models (instead they sell them on DVD for 49.99 o so), come on.
Give us long time fans everything that was ever made with girls like Joanne, Jana, April, etc to download, and I'll be an happy customer.
- Download speeds. It averages at 150 kbit/s per file, and I ave a 8mbit/s line, and there seems to be a 2 or 3 file downloadlimit.
- Only works in IE
Bottom Line: I think that ALS has run it course, yes it is still joinable, and it's not a bad site to join (especially if it is for the first time), but as a third time member I must say that I'm not impressed.

It feels like time stood still, and yes, they do HD, but it is so boring to watch.

And most of the new models are rubbish. They should have picked up at least 10 new models that they discarded from the casting sessions (because she looked unhappy or had a tattoo), come on man.

It's not good enough!

Reply To Review

Review Replies (12)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


PinkPanther (46) "It's not good enough!"

Channeling Gordon Ramsay?

08-20-10  09:45pm

Reply To Message


slutty (111) Good review artnoir, thanks for the info. I've been thinking about re-joining this place for a while.

Is the download speed really that poor? It seems hard to imagine a site only give you 150 kbit/sec, that's only like 20 KB/sec, that's beyond terrible.

08-20-10  11:04pm

Reply To Message


artnoir (17) REPLY TO #2 - slutty :

Yeah, I've contacted the webmaster and talked with him. But according t o him the problem is with my ISP. I don't think so, because I can download at 6-700 kbit/s on other places.
08-21-10  02:38am

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #2 - slutty :

I get some of my fastest d/l speeds at this site - usually 525 kbps/sec, which is the maximum Comcast seems to allow
08-21-10  05:42am

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) Good review artnoir. I'm always curious baout thi site. I think I might like their content but my big fear is always whetehr all the models scenes have both pic sets as well as videos. That's never been made clear to me. Could you enlighten me?
08-21-10  11:12am

Reply To Message


artnoir (17) REPLY TO #5 - pat362 :

All models have a page of their own with all the photoshoots,so you don't have to worry about that. Older models have all the picture content and original videos + remastered videos. Certainly not all of what was shot, but it's moving in the right direction.
08-21-10  12:35pm

Reply To Message


pat362 (375) REPLY TO #6 - artnoir :

Thanks artnoir. I don't think I explained myeself correctly. I'm more curious to know if all the models have videos to go along with their photoshoots or are there some that vane only photoshoots. I prefer video to photos so no matter how good the pics are if i don't have a video then I don't really care for teh rest.
08-21-10  04:37pm

Reply To Message


anyonebutme (14) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 :

They have action videos. But they do not create matching pairs, like ddf or 21sextury do.
08-21-10  11:06pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) I agree that there's too much fisting (and other bizarre practices), but that's the bread 'n butter for ALS Scans, it seems. I've been a long-term member, but I just ignore that part of it. Their photosets have so many pics that it's easy to get plenty even after discarding the shots with the "lip clamps," the "rocket," the "tongs," the fist and forearm (!) and other such weirdness.

The photo quality is certainly one thing that HAS greatly improved, and these days they're among the standard-setters, I'd dare say, and need I say ... since you've been there, off and on, as long as I have.

I also disagree with some of their casting decisions, as you do. Take Kennedy for example. She's quite unique, but not exactly a stunner. (Maybe with a couple years of ripening she'd look better?)

At least they got Kacey Chase and will be posting Monika Benz some time soon.

08-22-10  02:21am

Reply To Message


nadiencendia (83) I have seriously considered joining this site several times, but then I always decided against. It is true that they have classic sets from some very hot models, but I think it is quite expensive, and also I don't always like the kind of videos they make: masturbation, backstage or fisting. No other type of action or niche...
08-24-10  03:04am

Reply To Message


PinkPanther (46) REPLY TO #10 - nadiencendia :

I'm not sure how you can say that with the vast amount of girl/girl content they have on this site - especially from their annual Caribbean trips.
08-24-10  09:30pm

Reply To Message


artnoir (17) REPLY TO #10 - nadiencendia :

Classic sets or not, ALS is always worth joining. At least once in your life. You won't regret it.
09-17-10  04:48pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.