Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Matt\'s Models

Matt's Models (0)

Active
75
mudman (36) 02-14-07  10:15am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Volume
-Reputation (questionable)
Cons: -The web site is a mess and a bother to get around. It's a perfect example of what not to do.
-So many of the photos look like scans from magazines. The quality is poor, the color is uncontrolled, the clarity doesn't exist, just half-assed.
-If you want amateur, start with AbbyWinters, but don't go here.
Bottom Line: You can find these models elsewhere and can actually see them clearly in these places, but not with Matt's Models. This is perhaps the most over-rated site on the net. Quality is poor and the site is hard to get around. I checked out this site years ago and it's just as bad as it was before. Save your money. Go elsewhere.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Matt Frackas (5)
Webmaster
This is Matt from Matt's Models.

This review is so far off base I can't see how it would be of any value to anyone looking to accurately research adult sites.I also felt it more of a personal attack than an informed review. Here's my response to some of his nebulous claims below:

My reputation is "questionable"? What does that mean or imply? My reputation in the adult industry is immpeccable. I spent 10 years building it. It's only validated by the success of my site, my members, my reputation with the 1,500 models I've worked with, the awards my site has won and the deals I have struck with other reputable companies for producing some of the best Amateur content on the net.

Suggesting our photos were scanned from magazines is a statement I've never heard before and implies that we infringe copyrights of other photographers.

All of my material is 100% exclusive and has always been shot by us. I just looked at the 2 latest photos updates and they are 1067 x 1600 pixels and clear as daylight - unless you have a vision problem.

You CAN find many (not all) our models on other sites, but we are often in the first batch of sites to shoot U.S. models, if not the first - have been since 1999.

We take all valid complaints into consideration as we are always trying to better Matt's Models.
Example: "only 4 thumbs per photo gallery". In fact we had 2 options for members (4 and 20). However the 20 thumbs gallery view was an alternate - some people were missing the 20 thumbs option. As of this week, we changed the default view to the 20 thumbs view.

I felt this reviewer took liberties with the original "terms & conditions" of Porn Users. For example: Do not give "general opinions and little or no reasons to justify them."

Mudman does exactly this. He makes blanket, unclear statements with no evidence, no examples, no reasons, no proof.

How is that useful to potential members?

- Matt

03-30-07  11:46am

Reply To Message

2

Horny Ryan (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - Matt Frackas :

yea i dont understand any
of these negative reviews

ive been a member for years
and i dont have any complaints

the site is what it claims to be -
an amateur site featuring newbie models.

nearly 800 models and over 200k photos.

mudman is a tool lol

03-30-07  12:11pm

Reply To Message

3

RagingBuddhist (63) REPLY TO #1 - Matt Frackas :

He suggested that the pictures LOOK like scans - he didn't say they WERE scans.
07-07-07  04:59pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.