Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mudman (36)  

Feedback:   All (40)  |   Reviews (29)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (17)  |   Trust Ratings (17)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 40 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit True Amateur Models

True Amateur Models
(0)

74.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -raw amatuers
-unretouched photos
Cons: -A lot. Expensive, low number of updates, awkward navigation. you name it.
Bottom Line: I reread the TBS reviews before doing this quickie of my own. All in all, the reviews at TBS are dead-on, though they are kinder with the pros than I would have expected. Picture sizes are smallish for these days (1000 x 1500 seems to be the present standard to expect). Site navigation is so old.

With effort, this site could have been something, but the effort has never been done. Though not a favorite site of mine, Hot Wives and Girlfriends is a site more worthy of your amatuer style or "let's use the flash" consideration.

03-21-07  11:10am

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit Bunnies Club

Bunnies Club
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Nice models
-Nice Videos
Cons: -Another just ordinary site.
-Though the models are pretty, the subject matter is dull and dismissable.
Bottom Line: The Bunnies Club is a distant also-ran in the glamor model race. Much better choices out there. Everything I looked at left me wanting more, but not for the right reason. Nothing compells you to come back. It's just...nice.

A full access one week membership is all you'd ever need or want.

03-21-07  10:54am

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit 8 Teenies

8 Teenies
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Cute girls.
Cons: -Ordinary shoots.
-Ordinary site lay-out.
Bottom Line: The truth is, though I have a record of my having been a member, I remember little more than how blah and ordinary this site was. There's nothing from this site I kept, no fondness nor revulsion. It's a commercial site done for somebody, not you, to make money, without any heart or soul and not capable of offering anything memorable.

Spend you money on Nubiles or ATK or Infocus or TeenDreams. There are a lot of better choices out there.

03-21-07  10:46am

Replies (0)
Reply
4
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of BostonPJR's Reply

Boston:

Thanks for the compliment. Nobody need agree with me all the time, but to be apreciated just means so much to me and....oh dear, I said I wasn't going to do this. Give me a second.

Okay, as regards your question:

I never tried the lesser memberships with I Feel Myself or I Shot Myself or AbbyWinters. They are money savers, but you the user end up missing stuff. I'm not completely sure I understand why a site would offer partical memberships in the first place, unless it's their alternative to the trial membership. All of that group's Australian sites are good at what they do, including Girls Out West, though AbbyWinters is by far the most popular. And as regards Beautiful Agony, I doubt I'll ever check the site out. Though I like head shots as a part of the whole experience, I am a guy and there's more that i want to see.

With I Feel Myself, you get more. It's like an extention of AbbyWinter's Intimate Moments, but with multiple camera angles. Whereas AbbyWinter's using one camera top shoot the gal getting off, I Feel Myself typically uses three or more, including closer shots of the naughty bites action.

But anyway, with all these sites, I have never tried and wouldn't tried the lesser memberships. It would be too frustrating to long in and not be able to access what's being offered that day, so it's all or nothing for me.

Mudman


03-21-07  04:19am

Review
5
Visit Teens Garden

Teens Garden
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Some nice pix and videos
-Lots of promise.
Cons: -Poor web site organization.
-Doesn't come across as a serious site.
-Seems more just another Russian quick buck site. Enough to teaser, but not close to satisfying.
Bottom Line: TeensGarden is so okay, it's not funny. At every turn, just okay shows up. There are a lot of better sites out there, but TeensGarden is okay. Spend you money elsewhere, but TeensGarden is okay.

You won't feel like you've been ripped off, but you won't feel like you've been served either.

Go there if you feel really bored, otherwise pass. There are better mistakes on the web to make than this one.

03-19-07  12:43pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit Hairy Pussy Cuties

Hairy Pussy Cuties
(0)

72.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -There aren't many here other than the site complies with the premise of being hairy.
-There are some nice models.
Cons: -The photo sizes are odrinary as is the quality. Any self-respecting site these days need to offer 1000X 1500 pix. Anything less is not worth the trouble of looking at. This site offers small, outdated pix.
Bottom Line: This is such an ordinary site. it's not funny. There's nothing to gain by joiing this site. If you want hairy, go to atk, you 'll be loads happier.

03-19-07  12:16pm

Replies (0)
Reply
7
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

Roseman

Not going to get into any details here. If you read my reply to qualsite, I think you'll see that I covered what you're saying. These 100's just bug me.

Mudman


03-15-07  05:29am

Reply
8
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of qualsite34's Reply

Please don't think I was just picking on you. These 100's have been bothering me for a while and yesterday was my day to snap on it.

Unless you can measure it with some sort of ruler, when isn't it subjective.

Anyway, I agree, Abby Winters is the benchmark, standard bearer, leader of the pack, for amateur sites and I'd go further and included commercial sites as well. There's not a better site out there considering all things. They do some much brilliantly, but they're not perfect. You said as much in your reply and gave Abby a 100. To me it's a 98.

Perhaps the real issue is this cancer of grading on a curve. Sure made a lot of parents and teachers happy, but it is to education what the Ford Mustangs of the late seventies are to the Mustang line and cars in general. An ill conceived inflation of a good idea.

So forgive me, but I just couldn't take it any more.

Mudman


03-15-07  05:25am

Reply
9
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of qualsite34's Review

100% Give me a break.

I've been a member off and on and on again for years. True, Abby's one of the very best out there, if not the best, but 100 %? I just can't agree with any 100 % for any site. Sorry


03-14-07  08:12am

Reply
10
Visit abbywinters

abbywinters
(0)
Reply of abbywinters's Reply

Dear Abby:

I'm with ya on the break ups. I have DSL and I'm fine with it. What really would have me complaining, is downloading something 2 or three times bigger and finding it to be something I really don't care about.

I also like the letterbox videos and the quality. You offer some of the best .mpgs out there.

You've remained a benchmark for sites everywhere.


03-14-07  08:08am

Reply
11
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
Reply of SnowDude's Reply

One correction here. I said it's up to 12 photosets per day. Actually, it's up to 16 photosets per day.

03-14-07  07:45am

Reply
12
Visit I Shot Myself

I Shot Myself
(0)
Reply of SnowDude's Reply

Snowdude:

I Shot Myself gets a an 84 from me, because it is shot by the girls themselves. It's unique and fun and suprisingly good. There's a wonderful fresh difference and honesty to the whole thing. So removed from the "oh Babe, oh babe" approach to porn or adult nakeness. The pictures and videos are clear, largely crisp and unigue.

The site also gets an 84 from me because it is shot by themselves and the photo option have their limits due to the lengths of the girls' arms. It makes for some fun and great close ups, but the varied of angles and distance is physically limited. The site is also relatively young and therefor doesn't have the volume of major sites, but it is a gas.

So, high on the imaginative and low on the limitations of one's reach. It's a good and fun site to be experienced at least once and for at least one month, just not a great site.

I think it could be considered a great site. if it actually partner up with it's sister site, I Feel Myself. If it were, I Shot and Felt Myself, that would be a 90's cool.


03-12-07  05:41am

Reply
13
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)
Reply of SnowDude's Reply

Dear Snowdude:

Yeah, it's just okay, much like dozen of other sites. I actually was thinking about the site the day before you wrote. There are 3 sites, Teendream, Teenrotica and Infocus. Actually, I confused my reviews. I'd said of Infocus, that the close-up rarely were infocus, but I was thinking of Teenrotica. Infocus actually fairs pretty well in using the camera.

The problem, especially with these 3 sites, is how indistinquishable they are from each other. The poses are so cookie cutter, that the photographer certainly must use index cards telling him what shot at what angle is next. The quality is generally quite skilled, but gets boring because there's so little imagination or effort in the shot.

All three sites do have volume, do have pretty girls, are shot in color, but simply seem to provide the expected same old same old. They don't need to go radical on every shoot, just do something creative once and a while, so there's a reason to get up in the morning and take a look.

So, for volume, pretty girls and a boring sameness, an 84. They fix the boring and a higher score. They lose their volume or girls and a lower score. They're good, not exciting, but not bad. A 5 page shoot, 3 pages of clothes almost off, 4th page naked 5th page money shot and see ya. ATK Galleria is a better chose for this, as you get unmatched volume, up to 12 sets a day.

Of the three, I'd say Infocus was the most interesting.

That's it.


03-12-07  04:55am

Review
14
Visit Naughty America

Naughty America
(5)

83.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Volume
-Clarity of the images whether photos or video.
-Some very nice looking women.
Cons: -A serious something of the same-old-same-old. Expect the been-there-heard-that porn speak in the videos. If it works for you fine, but give me a break.
-Reality as fiction. They aren't the only one doing this, but it's so, so irritating. They only make it worse by bending it into some bad acted porn tradition.
-Inconsistent on what they offer in vidoe formats and photos.
Bottom Line: There are better places to go and spend you dollars. Naughty America is not bad, but it's no where near as good as what most of us deserve for our dollar. Look elsewhere first. Naughty America is not bad settle, but it is a settle.

03-07-07  01:25pm

Replies (0)
Review
15
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Cute models.
-A nice difference on some sites.
-Didn't start out this way, but they have some fine photographs of a good large size.
--Videos reflect what you see in the photos.
Cons: -The only video format they offer is .wvm.
-Still not a lot here in this network. They apparently update each site once a week, so volume is going to be a while. Seems at least once site is dead.
-So formula. We do this and then this and this. Get's boring, though the pictures are nice.
Bottom Line: It's not that bad, though don't write home to mother about it. It's interesting and you can see what you're looking at. Thier biggest plus, is that it's clear they are getting better and better each time out. You may not be interested today, but check back, 'cause you may be soon.

03-07-07  01:10pm

Replies (0)
Review
16
Visit Meat Members

Meat Members
(0)

78.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -A fun first see.
-multiple sites included.
-good pik and vids
Cons: -Same old same old.
-You get what you want on the site, and get it and get it and get it. It'll beat you down.
Bottom Line: There's no imagination with this site. It is what it is, and sadly so. Join for a month, but cancel before any second month starts. There's a lot offered, but it's so heavy in sameness. It'll interest you for a day and then bore you to death.

02-26-07  10:14am

Replies (0)
Review
17
Visit Teenrotica

Teenrotica
(1)

84.0
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -good sized photos.
-reasonable videos
-reasonable navigaton
Cons: -just doesn't offer anything to get excited about.
-same old, same old.
Bottom Line: Teenrotica is a nice site, but that's the extent of it. It comes across as, and probably as it is, a commercial, formula site. You can find some nice stuff, but the big wait is for it to live up to half the promise you feel it has. It comes across as gloss without substance.

02-16-07  10:32am

Replies (6)
Review
18
Visit Girls Bottom

Girls Bottom
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -girls bottoms
Cons: -a messy site to navigate.
-only 5% of the pix are worth looking at.
-just a very, very big blah.
Bottom Line: A great idea and subject matter, but GirlsBottom couldn't abuse such promise more than it has. With any luck, this effort will evaporate into forgotten oblivion. They need to do olympic back flips to get this site into any worthwhile state. Give value to the money I spent by saving your money and avoiding this site.

02-16-07  10:17am

Replies (0)
Review
19
Visit Matt's Models

Matt's Models
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Volume
-Reputation (questionable)
Cons: -The web site is a mess and a bother to get around. It's a perfect example of what not to do.
-So many of the photos look like scans from magazines. The quality is poor, the color is uncontrolled, the clarity doesn't exist, just half-assed.
-If you want amateur, start with AbbyWinters, but don't go here.
Bottom Line: You can find these models elsewhere and can actually see them clearly in these places, but not with Matt's Models. This is perhaps the most over-rated site on the net. Quality is poor and the site is hard to get around. I checked out this site years ago and it's just as bad as it was before. Save your money. Go elsewhere.

02-14-07  10:15am

Replies (3)
Review
20
Visit Older Women

Older Women
(0)

79.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Volume of images and decent videos
-Visual clarity for the most part.
-Reasonably easy to get around site.
Cons: -Images are in the 800 to 1000 pix range. Not bad, but so yesterday and so unexciting.
-Nothing personal about the site and photo sets feel more formula than most.
-Just not a lot of excitment here.
Bottom Line: -If you want a good mature overview, this is a good site, but don't expect anything really impressive. The site comes in as okay and never anything more or more promising. SOme really nice models and some so, so forgetable.
-Photo set seem mired in formula.
-Check it out for a month, but don't go looking to stay longer. Nice for a visit and nice for judging other sites, not all that nice for the quality most users desire.

02-14-07  10:04am

Replies (0)
Reply
21
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

Roseman:

Now I'm lost. Which cut in stone web site are you referencing. You've review 27 of them.

Every site needs to offer a basic basis of quality. Every member or potential member deserves this much. Videos need to accessible to all and photos need to be clear, seeable, large enough and somewhat appealing. This certainly places some constraints upon artistry, but not unreasonably so.

Are you suggesting that anything goes, if the particular site's subject matter agreed with your or whomever interest, is okay? Seems an insufficent standard to me. Everything out there need to live up to more, as the majority is falling way short. We user/members feed this beast with our subsciptions, our money, so we should get quality regardless of the site. So I find so problem on not addressing any one failing site over another. The problem is in the system. It wants us to accept too much mediocrity as some form of quality. "Here's a great site, now spend you money and be unhappy with it."

I don't think I'm opposing you, but we may not be being as clear with each other as would be desireable.

mudman


02-06-07  10:29am

Reply
22
Visit Ass Traffic

Ass Traffic
(0)
Reply of roseman's Review

Roseman_

You've hit me, so here's my inquiry.

What do you find wothwhile when it comes to photography? What size of image and what quality? Do you have interests in lighting or not?

Are there photographers you are impressed with or are you being ignored here?

With regards to videos, regardless of subject matter what isues to you have? Every site should offer enough formats for all to enjoy, and every video should be clear enough for anyone to see and appreciate. Since I'm even mentioning this, it's not something we've been burderned with. Which sites, in your opinion, serve us viewers as we should be served?


02-05-07  10:59am

Reply
23
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)
Reply of roseman's Reply

I mean just that. There's nothing to write home about here. It nice, as far as company flash camera work goes, but why should I care. It's not personal, not ground breaking, certainly not good and vertainly not excellent in the context of photographic skill. In fact, I'm thinking less of it the more I think about it. It's a psuedo-amateur site that needs members to buy into its pitch in order to have any chance at all. The more reviewed, the worst the chances for this site.

As regards the models...I wish lots better.


02-01-07  01:20pm

Review
24
Visit Hot Wives And Girlfriends

Hot Wives And Girlfriends
(0)

76.0
Status: Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros: -An interesting amatuer feel.
-part of a network, so there's some choice here.
Cons: -Though it's fun a first view, it's nothing more than the same old same old.
-Videos are okay, but not exceptional.
-Photos are just okay at best.
Bottom Line: -Any review of one site, is a review of all as they include all when you join.
-When you look at Wives and Girlfriends, you're looking at a a collection of sites. Within this collection are a fair number of repeats or duplications. The sites offer creampies, but sadly once you're seen one, you've seen all of them.
-If there's a model you've been following, then you may want to join for a month.
-If you've been looking to see some amatuer style creampie action, you may want to join for a month.
-If you want to find an interesting site with something new to offer from time to time, then you don't want to join.

02-01-07  10:32am

Replies (3)
Review
25
Visit Helen Volga

Helen Volga
(0)

72.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: -some good photos.
-apparent experience.
-little to never seen before models.
Cons: -not very impressive at all.
-too expensive, by far, for what's offered.
Bottom Line: The feel you get from from Helen Volga, is another site from someone who's been in the business, who's cashing in on what they've done before they cash out. There's nothing exciting here. True, it's not likely what you've seen (not licenced or such), but you'll only end up seeing a style and approach which you could have seen elsewhere and for a better value. Not worth the price of admission, but certainly not the worse or least responsive site out there. They just have a long way to go before becoming worthwhile.

02-01-07  10:20am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 40 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.67 seconds.