Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (2)

artnoir (17) 02-02-08  04:07pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (1)

Video content

Met art is an absolutely fantastic site. I'm a two-time member and I have always enjoyed the site. Except for the vidoes.
Compare the photosets with the vidoes...they're just not good enough. The vidoes don't make justice to neither the model or the photoset itself.

Although the quality has somewhat improved over the years, it's still quite blurry and unfocused. I just wonder when it is time for Met Art (and similiar sites) to take the video art as seriously as photgraphy?

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (3)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

elephant (65) I agree I used to love looking through sexy nude photos of hot european babes, now I think its all a little boring at met-art, it needs vids and start concentrating more on this and they would get loads more people signing up, I won't say all but the majority of people would like also to see a good range of vids in this day and age of the models. And love it if met-art did a spin off site with vids and had the models not do hardcore, (that would be good though he he) but did a little more daring and more lesbian scenes, they would please a lot of people, cause lets face it the met-art girls are top notch and lots of them are on other sites doing slightly harder stuff. Just be good to see more passion.

Still thats my opinion, I know heaps just love the photos. I wish they'd also do more photos with girls doing sexy poses with clothes on too and stripping seductively, maybe flashing no panty shots outside like they do at mpl studios. Can't beat that in my book. well hot lesbian sex maybe does lol.

02-03-08  01:32am

Reply To Message

2

Monahan (42) I totally agree. The videos on Met-Art are awful in many respects; especially that most are merely videos of photo shoots with nothing at all enjoyable about them.

The trend at Met-Art is moving toward more suggestive (sexy) poses away from just figure model poses in various stages of dress but they haven't moved into any insertions of any kind nor have males ever made it into any of their content.

The superior photography and the superior beauty of the models has been enough to maintain this site's success, but it will have to move out of the 20th Century soft core suggestive stuff a' la Playboy to a recognition of the models' sensuality.

05-11-08  10:29am

Reply To Message

3

PinkPanther (46) I've gotta say that I finally - after 3 years or so of membership - saw a vid on their site that didn't make me turn it off in less that 1 minute.

Yes, it's by their usual video guy - Goncharov. Yes, it's got that same Cinemax synth-flute music. So what's the difference with their new vid - Marinan? Simple - the model has so much joi de vivre and is such a joy to watch that even the guy that has made more hideously boring vids of gorgeous women than anybody I can think of couldn't ruin it - or maybe he's getting better finally?

Ya never know!

06-09-08  08:00pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.