Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes (2)

Drooler (220) 12-31-07  01:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (83), NO (0)

Late-breaking news

Today I see that MCN Nudes has a new look. They also seem to be up to standardizing all of their galleries in 3 sizes, the two largest being 1200px and 4000px, for all of their content from the beginning of the site's history.

BUT while they've put in the links for those sizes under the thumbnails in the galleries, the pic sizes have NOT changed as far as I've been able to tell, at least not yet. I went through several of my favorite models, such as Susana Spears and Marketa Belonoha, and that's what I've found as of the moment.

My subscription runs out pretty soon, so I might not be able to revise my review of Dec. 26 in time should real changes in those pic sizes take effect.

So this is an FYI. I will pass on this "splendid torch" to a future degenerate ...

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (9)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

jd1961 (95) I've never been a member. When I click on their preview page, I'm getting error messages. Is the site working at the moment? Happy New Year!
12-31-07  04:20pm

Reply To Message

2

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #1 - jd1961 :

Hey JD,

Happy 2008!

The site is plagued with server problems, seems to me, and it's been that way for quite some time. I really wish they'd started their makeover a little further under the hood instead of doing this paint job first.

And who knows when, or if, those images (especially some earlier ones) marked as 4000px actually will be. Could it become another Superglamish fiasco? Let's hope not, but only time will tell. One thing's for sure, it's not good practice doing it the way they've done it.

With updates, EVERY damn web site in existence should do it from "the inside out" (bottom to top of the directory tree) but a lot of them do it bass-ackwards instead, announcing updates or changes that aren't online yet. MetArt and MetModels, two otherwise great sites, are among the guilty, although Met-Art has been updating a lot earlier in the day than they used to (Yay!).

01-01-08  01:09am

Reply To Message

3

Denner (233) Hey again

Rather cool design - it looks great....

Still I'm more on the 78 from your review concerning content. I don't know what it is, but apart from the fine models some things are still missing to make this a great site.
Maybe it lacks some real sensuallity, some sexier ways in photos and videos - even some of the Playboy videos - and photos for that matter - are more sexy than MCN.

01-01-08  03:16pm

Reply To Message

4

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #3 - Denner :

Yeah, I just made a summary statement in the review that there's too much "detached" posing -- what jd1961 coined as "JC Penny poses" because the models sometimes seem like mannequins. That's the lack of sensuality that you're talking about.

It really is a fundamental problem with the site, I think. I'd just like there to be more personality and a sense of "being with" coming through. Some of models like Susana Spears, Marketa, and Marina/Euprhat put it out pretty nicely, but that's because they're naturals at it -- so it seems to me. But they are among the exceptions!

01-01-08  04:40pm

Reply To Message

5

jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #4 - Drooler :

Wow, I can't believe it I actually coined a phrase! I've been avoiding this site and now you confirm my suspicions.
01-01-08  05:18pm

Reply To Message

6

Mayvary (2) Hey Drooler,
mcn did not standardized their image sizes! They still offer and going to release more up to 5000 px galleries ... so you must hit them up in the middle of making the last tweaks to the site :D

Cya
Mayvary

01-09-08  04:40am

Reply To Message

7

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #6 - Mayvary :

I'll keep an eye out, mostly at PU just in case anyone joins and finds that the pic sizes actually match the sizes under the thumbs in the earlier galleries.

My membership just expired about a week ago and I don't plan on returning for a few months.

01-09-08  08:18am

Reply To Message

8

Mayvary (2) REPLY TO #7 - Drooler :

Hi Drooler,
I'll take over int he meantime :D my account will stay long enough to create an overall new review next month (old experires then :D)

Cya around
may

01-11-08  03:41am

Reply To Message

9

Drooler (220) REPLY TO #8 - Mayvary :

Great! Thanks!
01-11-08  03:42am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.