Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls (2)

PosterDude (14) 12-18-07  08:11am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (19), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Nice Magazine Covers
+ Nice Web Design
+ Have to cancel to get lower membership price offer of $19,95 USD
+ Set of large pictures given every 4-6 months
+ Just started HD video
Cons: - No Daily Updates up to a week for single model update
- Blurry and porly lit pictures
- Girls seem forced into uncomfortable situations and not very happy.
- Only one size small pictures offered weekly
- No customer service. Tried to cancel and charged again. No email back
- Not so many pretty models
Bottom Line: I originally join site because of TheBestPorn review but was very sad. TBP review not honest about site. Ftv updates every 6-7 days which makes it not worth money. Only single model updates so when model not pretty you have to wait 1 more week and wish a pretty girl is added. To many bigger sites for money update daily like met-art, ronharris, alscans, and 1by-day with higher quality pictures and better video. Ftv trys to shoot glamore but Met-art is very much better quality and value. Site not first time video because always same models do video for Ronharris and other sites many months before ftv.

Many pictures are blurry/graney that is why pictures are only given in one small size for download. Every 4-6 month site releases a set of supersize pictures hand selected to find no blurry pictures. They should give all picture sizes in each weekly update. Site has nice magazine covers to get peoples money. Almost no Hi-Def video, only few models. Rest of site is low def video.

Same models shot at other sites look much better. I collect pretty models from many sites and ftv pictures and video are never as good. In videos man filming makes models uncomfortable and makes me sad for them. This is true review that so many more better sites for money with daily updates. Site does have some pretty girls but not enough. Members site layout is very good. Site was better 3 years before but now compatition much better then Ftv.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (7)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


Drooler (220) I rejoined recently after being away about a year. I agree more with your opinion of this site. The blurry and grainy photos are irritating and I think inexcusable.

They recently had some nice new stuff of Carli Banks and Jamie Lynn, separately and together, but the poses were only partly good.

Also, for a site these days, there should be standard access to photos at 3000+ as an option in their regular galleries. I hate the way they pick certain photos and put them, quite seldomly, into separate "mega-sized" collections and then don't even give you previews of what you'll be getting. They waste their own bandwidth by making it necessary for a user to download the large zips of those pics, only to possibly toss them out, gallery after gallery. That's what I've done. And of course it wastes the user's time, too.

And oh, even though they've recently raised their bandwidth limit again, it's still obviously contrary to have us downloading large files of what we might reject (having no preview) and THEN having a bandwidth limit, too! Ridiculous.

The site has an attractive design, but I've never been very impressed by what really counts, the content.

I've never understood why this site gets such high marks by some, but there's just no accounting for tastes, I guess.

12-18-07  09:31am

Reply To Message


PosterDude (14) REPLY TO #1 - Drooler :

That why I was so mad at TBP people for there false review. Because of TBP I waste my money and now do not trust site reviews. Maybe Ftv pay people to get high review.

I try best to give good propper review of sites and be honest. You do good reviews and should review Ftv. Not many updates for money made me most sad and I for got to list bandwidth limit as bad to. It is over I just move on to much better sites.

12-18-07  01:47pm

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #2 - PosterDude :

As far as TBP is concerned, I've been burned enough times myself by trusting their reviews that anymore, I mostly check them for new site listings or the pure data they provide and not the more subjective impressions they have.

Even the data can be wrong, too, though, as I've experienced as well (e.g., "full-trial" when it's not).

I don't think that the TBP reviewers are dishonest or taking bribes, but they don't seem to have the same kinds of in-depth experiences with sites that we at PU have. Frankly, I think they're a pretty shallow and incompetent lot. They could at least tell us how large the pics are, but they just don't. I think, "Aren't they supposed to review what's on the site??"

Thank God they don't review automobiles! (Skid ... crash!!)

And there are people at PU who say we should be members of a site for at least a month before writing a review, but you don't seee them saying that to the TBP reviewers.

Thanks again for the "straight from the hip" review of FTV Girls.

12-18-07  03:49pm

Reply To Message


jd1961 (95) REPLY TO #3 - Drooler :

They certainly don't take money, if they did they wouldn't allow our negative reviews. It's all about the "clicks"!
12-27-07  04:20am

Reply To Message


Drooler (220) REPLY TO #4 - jd1961 :

That's what I think, too. Sometimes I'll read a review at TBP but visit the site by just typing in the address outside of TBP. It's gotten to that point.
12-27-07  07:25am

Reply To Message


Davit (46) REPLY TO #2 - PosterDude :

PosterDude, I don't think TBP take back handers from any porn company to give good reviews. But the bottom line is: don't trust those reviews, or any other professional review site's reviews. Only pay attention to independent user reviews. At least that's my motto.

Professional reviews nearly always seem to be in the late 80s and upwards. They're just not truly reflective of the reality out there. Some sites barely merit more than 10/100. And these review sites often review many dozens of pay sites, so I'm suspicious that they have either the time or money to do this properly.

I reckon a good proportion of professional reviews out there are based solely on the free tours! So no wonder they're artificially high!
Not saying that's the case with TBP, but is just a general suspicion of mine.

01-20-08  10:50am

Reply To Message


BostonPJR (Disabled) REPLY TO #6 - Davit :

Agreed. Although I don't know about "artificially high" seems like on the sites I like, I am consistently 5 points higher than TBPs reviewer. And I'm sure not getting any kickbacks.
07-26-08  11:15am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.01 seconds.