Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Brazzers

Brazzers (3)

RagingBuddhist (65) 12-01-07  03:44am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (61), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + User discount
+ Network Access, along with bonus feeds, gives you a lot of content to check out
+ Download speeds usually over 1000k/s
+ User can leave comments directly on the site about individual scenes
+ Video options - wmv, mpg and flash
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Allows use of download manager (although not acceleration )
+ No download limit
+ No DRM
+ Model search
Cons: - Pictures sets seem to include unnecessarily repetitive shots
- Navigation on larger picture sets was hindered with a "page jump" that doesn't include all the consecutive pages (1 2 3 ... 9 10 11 ... 20 21 22)
- Pic/vid quality leaves a lot to be desired
- Recent updates seem to be only for some sites
- Sites prompt for cookies WAY too much
- Server doesn't allow download acceleration
- Too much space devoted to ads for other site
- A cookie hungry network
Bottom Line: For $20, I had to check it out. There's definitely a lot of content to check out so I'm not totally disappointed. But I guess I was hoping for something more. (Something else?) Too many siliconed tits and women with that open-mouthed, see-how-hot-this-is look, in my opinion.

The high quality pics aren't what I'd call high quality at all - 600x900 (and less!)? The video quality leaves a bit to be desired. Maybe I haven't found the sites that have been updated recently, but most of the video I've seen is at 320 resolution.

They seem to devote a lot of space to ads for other sites which I felt only added to an already clumsy navigation.

I still can't understand why the site prompts for cookies the way it does. Other than your first access to one of the sites, there seems to be a certain randomness to it. Once in, things like clicking on a file to download shouldn't be a call to set another cookie. I know I'll be cleaning out my browser once I'm done here!

I originally gave this site an 80 - only that high because I realize I was a bit out of my element here. I'm decidedly more into amateur material. But, with the resolution issues, the somewhat awkward navigation, the upsells AND what happened when I tried to cancel my subscription, I don't see this as such a great place to be. See my comment on the right about cancelling.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date


ace of aces (179) i had no problem to use my download accelerator. i also had no problems with cookies from that site.....all in all i totally disagree with youre opinion, you seem to like more amateure pages maybe?

but however it`s a question of taste.

let me ask you one more question: which comparable site with comparable content is better than this one in the net?!

12-01-07  05:36am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #1 - ace of aces :

I'm curious what browser you use. I use Firefox and have it set to prompt for each cookie and each time it wants to modify a cookie. I see that as a good way to see what sites are looking at what. Kind of like tracking the tracker? I get more requests to set second cookies here than I think is necessary. To me, once a site has established that I'm a legitimate user, there should be no need to set another one.

I'd also like to know what accelerator you use, even though I've never seen them work any differently. As I know it, acceleration comes by breaking a download into parts and downloading them all at once. Because I run a server app from my home computer, and know the burden that heavy acceleration places on a server, I keep Free Download Manager set to a modest four parts maximum. But, when it shows me that I've reached the limit of connections and I'm only connected once, I'm downloading in real time - That's not acceleration.

I think you answered your question to me yourself. You're right - it is a matter of taste and I generally steer clear of sites like this. I really have nothing to compare it to, although you, yourself, mentioned Bangbros. I'd joined that years ago and found it to be very much like what I saw at Brazzer's - and I haven't been back to Bangbros either.

12-01-07  10:07am

Reply To Message


ace of aces (179) REPLY TO #2 - RagingBuddhist :

i am using the internet explorer and as a dlacc i use the "download accelerator plus"(it`s only shareware :) ), and it`s the only way to have get my full speed at the connetion (12.000kbit/s).

at least you aren`t a great fan of those sites, comparable with me and the abbywinters site :)...but if you really want to see lousy made big boobs, shaved pussies, tattoed girls and bad played screaming sex you have to visit Naughty America VIP. that`s really lousy :) (compared with the other named sites)..although they are good rated -.-

12-01-07  11:03am

Reply To Message


RagingBuddhist (65) REPLY TO #3 - ace of aces :

I'm with you on Abby's, as my review here will tell you : - )
I also agree with you about Naughty America VIP. Unless given a free pass, I'd never sign up there. Even the previews scream "Plastic!" to me.

Internet Explorer, to the best of my knowledge, can't be set up like Firefox when it comes to cookies. It's been years since I've used it but the last I remember, there was a way to raise your security but it made browsing a very awkward affair. If you were to clean out all your cookies and start from scratch, I think you'd be surprised how many are being left while running through this network.

I did a Google search for "download accelerator plus" and, if all the links were pointing to the same program you're using, it uses the same technology the rest do - breaks the download into pieces. Since we can't post links here, I might suggest you Google for free download manager and see what you find. FDM might even have more features than your paid for program. If I did, indeed, find the program you have, it has a limit of 10 connections per server - FDM can be set at any number. Just to see it's capabilities, I've hit servers with as many as 20 connections at once! Not exactly a nice thing to do, but I guess it's nice to know you've got it when you absolutely have to have a file NOW!

12-01-07  11:26am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.02 seconds.