|
|||||
|
| Site(s) | Announcement / Comment | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple Sites (0) |
Type:
TBP Review Reply Maggie dropped the ball, obviously. I am thoroughly insulted by your review, and evidently someone wasn't paying very close attention. Express Review indeed. I was scored low on everything, including things that I have a clearly superior grasp on, such as features and downloads. Hell, when members sign up for my simple low priced membership, they're able to readily and easily download EVERY single video I've ever done, and view all of my photo sets (at least a third of which are 640x480 and crystal clear, shot with a digital SLR, so where Maggie's bitching about my quality comes in, I'm not quite sure). If the quality comments are in regards to the videos and some of the other photos, need I *REALLY* Point out that the name is *CAMGIRL*Kitten, of both myself as an actress, webadmin, and of THE SITE ITSELF? CAMGIRL implies webcam, and that's obviously the biggest market of my website. This niche market requires 24/7 live webcam streaming, which I also offer members for no extra charge, plus the ability to buy their own custom one on one self-directed camshow. I've got over 5,000 photos and almost 70 individual full length 10 minute to 60 minute videos which total at around 8 hours worth of fully downloadable .wmv content all for $10 and no limits on the trial, what part of all of that deserves such harsh criticism? She did not take into ANY account what-so-ever the important things like the fact that i'd done the entire site myself from scratch and it wasn't just another cookie cutter mass produced porn site. Evidently that's what Maggie desires. Maybe she was just having a bad day, but this is a whole new level of unacceptable. Unless someone has something better to say, I'm ruling slander out of my marketing techniques, thanks. -CamGirlKitten Reply To News |
11-29-07 10:27am Replies (0) |
Be the first to reply to CamGirlKitten! Reply To News
|
