Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Comment A note about the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Met Art

Met Art (4)

Monahan (38) 11-16-07  05:14pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (56), NO (0)

Outstanding PG Site, Not Great Video

The site will satisfy anyone who is interested in what once were called PG (Pretty Girl) photo sets, meaning the photos are the softest of soft core (would pass the strictest censors in the late 60's/early 70's). The videos are, as stated elsewhere, boring and mostly basic photo sessions captured on video.

Being a video guy myself, and having dropped in on the site a few times in the past, I haven't visited in a while. But because I'm signed up for their newsletter, I received an offer to sign up for $19.95 that I accepted.

Contrary to comments made elsewhere, there are many photo sets with the babes in full spread eagle poses with their, frequently large, labia lips on full display.

Conversely, there is no masturbation or insertions of any kind at all, and only a very few of the multiple model sets have any erotic lesbian content at all.

But there's no site that has better "PG" photography that I've run across.

A negative that needs mentioniong is that there is no searchable data base for their huge collection. That means if you want to find a blonde with large breasts, or a brunette with pubic hair, or outdoor active shots, etc., you must look through the entire catalog that can be displayed as "magazine covers" or as head shots.

Reply To Comment

Comment Replies (2)

Replies to the user comment above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

hondaman (7) I dont think that seeing a woman's labia or vagina as can be seen in some met art sets would ever pass a 60's censor seeing as they airbrushed out labia back then.
11-13-08  01:53pm

Reply To Message

2

Monahan (38) REPLY TO #1 - hondaman :

If I recall correctly Playboy started with full frontal nudity in the late 1960's followed quickly by Penthouse and Hustler. Perhaps the labia displays began in the early 1970, not the late 60's, but my point is that Met Art's stuff is really of that era except that the Met Art models are quite a bit younger than those appearing in the mags of the 70's.
11-13-08  09:44pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.