Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Webmaster Profile A detailed history of activity from this webmaster in all different categories.
Webmaster : brig (10)

View Feedback:   Replies (13)         Other:   Site Feedback (229)   |   Replies Received (3)

Incoming Feedback All feedback to this webmaster's managed sites.
Shown : 26-46 of 46 Page :    < Previous Page

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Rating
26
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

93.0
No Review.
06-04-11  08:50am

Review
27
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

80.0
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - High quality porn vids and picture sets

- Site lay out is user friendly

- The owners vision is refreshing

- They care for their models before shoots
Cons: - Site content is growing, so, not a ton of it just yet. Photo sets not as good as the videos.

- Serious issues with videos ending up on free sites in very short time.

- Bad editing on some videos, no climax
Bottom Line: A nice, unique art-porn site that features attractvie models having hot sex. Nice picture sets as well and a good selection of models to date. You don't feel like you need a shower after visiting the site in that their affairs are handled with class. They have shown the ability to take experienced models and make them fresh, if not innocent.

Some videos, leave you hanging in that they have an awkward end. By that I mean no climax. Some picture sets have the same look after one becomes accustomed to offerings. Some are as small as ten pics, many are average at best. I think the goal was to make it appear they had more sets. Many of the picture sets are directly from the video, so nothing new. One more thing, videos are fairly short, all under ten minutes.

When I first joined, content was mimimal. After my membership expired they seemed to add a lot more content. Worth one try for sure, but I would wait a good six months for content to catch up after that. Most of their videos end up on free sites far too quickly, a problem many are having in the current climate of on-line porn. Classy site overall, but nothing overly special just yet, but the potential is there. Again, worth a look and I will likely pay anpother visit in six months time.

05-13-11  11:32am

Replies (0)
Review
28
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

85.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: - very beautiful models some exclusive I didn't saw elsewhere
- great photography, very neat and perfect light
- videos are beautiful too
- nice layout, classy and clean
- videos play fast, easy to navigate
Cons: - a lot of sets look all the same except for the girl, same light, same kind of location
- framings are not very original within a set, you will have sometimes 10 pictures in a row, shot from the same exact angle, with very few variations, too bad...
- uneasy to find what you're looking for, you can't even do basic search, only by name by date and by rating :(
- maybe I'm wrong but because of that, I feel that this website contains very few content
Bottom Line: I loved the pictures Mr. Brigham Fields did for his previous website, Goddess. There were creative, with breathtaking models, quite softcore (but perfect for me), very well lit, with different clothings and sophisticated lighting, so I decided to join X-Art last month because of that.

The models are all very well choosen. They are all almost perfect, they tend to be same kind of shape, very slim, look like they are between 18 and 23, with small to perfect breast. no tatooos, no piercing.

When I looked at the first sets I downloaded I was very happy, scenery is perfect, beautiful backlit, very sharp pictures and sometimes very hardcore stuff, and perfectly lit.
Same for the videos, I didn't downloaded the FullHD videos because I don't really need that size, but, the videos in low res were perfect. I think they were shot with those canon 5Dmk2, very cinematic look, with beautiful out of focus things, it looks very professionnal and some are very Xrated which is great to have porn shot like hollywood movies.

I really told to myself that I found the best site ever...
But...

It quickly became all the same, there is very few variation within different photosets, Mr Fields found his style, the backlit washout effect is great, but please, not on all the shots ! You did something much more complex and interesting with Goddess. It's like he had choosen the facility, which is really not a good idea as he certainly is one of the most talented photographer and light technician. And beside, some sets are all shot from the same angle, come on, you're not on a wheel chair ! move !!

So I try to find something different but searching photosets quickly became a pain in the back, there is no real search options. So I quickly gave up. I kept some videos and some pictures because the girls are absolutely stunning and the pictures are perfect taken one by one, but when you look at the whole production, you feel a bit sorry that all look the same. Girls are almost always completely nude, so there isn't even a different lingerie or clothing to keep.
I didn't renew my membership because I feel I won't see anything really new, which is really too bad considering what Mr Fields did in the past...
I would recommend this website but just for one month, there is no need to stay longer because new sets are just copies of old ones. :(

05-07-11  04:11pm

Replies (2)
Comment
29
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Video length and quality?

This is a very attractive looking site but browsing in the preview mode I have some doubts about the videos. 1080p Quicktime files are in some cases smaller than 200 megabytes when I'm used to single HD scenes being closer to one gigabyte in the least. Are they upscaled and heavily compressed or just very short?

I understand this used to be more of a photo site so could it be that those older videos despite their resolution were just a bonus?

02-25-11  12:02am

Replies (4)
Comment
30
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

x-art is A SUPERB SITE 95/100%

Superb site with very beautiful and fresh faced models with great bodies and well produced movies.

There could be more content but, what there is, is SUPERIOR

02-23-11  10:36pm

Replies (1)
Review
31
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

80.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: • Excellent Photo & Video Quality for all Videos
• New Site,Tri-Weekly Updates,Upcoming Schedules
• New Models,Exotic Locations,Nice Themes,Shoots
• Mainly Photos with BG,GG,3Some,Solo,Masturbation
• Weekly single video with Hardcore,Solo Themes
• Unseen,fresh,exclusive footage,no clones here
• Streaming Speeds are very good,no buffering
• Photo sets with 3 grades,view or download them
• Comments,Private Messages & Suggestions welcome
• Good Response to Site Issues-Membership/Content
• Great mixture of light,dark,wheaty complexioned
• HD 1080i Quality Videos,Pictures,Images et al
• Under $20 will get you a month's membership!
• Updates (Mon/Wed/Fri),good for a weekend package
Cons: • Randomly allotted User Name/Password for access
• Highly Cumbersome to recall User Name/Password
• Major difficulties to download with FTP Software
• Bi/Tri Weekly Photo Updates {Multiple Themes}
• Fortnightly Video Updates{Hardcore/Solo Themes}
• Downloads very slow with browser DM's(FF/Opera)
• Searches only by name, not category,date-wise
• Artistic photography site,growing on porn videos
• Emphasis more on female subjects,not male models
• Hardcore Content not full blown,developing now
• Site may appeal more to a connoisseur/enthusiast
• High HD Videos don't play well with most players
• HD Video Sizes are huge & occupy Hard Disk Space
Bottom Line: X-Art.com is a beautifully crafted site with a heady mixture of erotic photos,images & videos so its a very titillating sort of adventure. Yet its content is subtle,inviting & alluring to the viewer. Those used to Hardcore action had better watch out as the pace of things here are a tad low. This explains perhaps why there are so few videos here but there is much to look forward to in the coming months if the site goes with its convictions.

The quality here really brings out the expertise & appreciation of the fact that we're seeing some real professionals at work.Perhaps one day all videos & photo sets will be this way. Its almost as if you are with the model in some of the shots!

Young Nubile Models never seen before really goes well for a photography site & they never forget their roots here which is an important feature. Quite a few sites I have come across get lost in the haze of opportunity & the maze of glory which
deviates from their primary goals. Here its almost
a religion, photography.

All in all, this site's a must for those who crave quality erotica,sex & erotic photography. If that's who you are hop in & enjoy. There's a kind of a youthful flavor & appeal here I must say
Even the fashionable aficionados will surely find something to savor, it surely will not disappoint. Finally those looking for Hardcore Sex & Entertainment will find the site not upto their standards but then again there are several of those where that came from!

01-27-11  05:57am

Replies (2)
Comment
32
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Expensive for what you get

OK hi quality photography but overall not particularly exciting stuff. Majority are white caucasian, lack of diversity here. I wouldn't pay $20 again.

01-02-11  08:38am

Replies (0)
Review
33
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful ladies from all over
-Good photography and videography
-Good download speeds
-Download managers work
-No DRM
-Zip downloads of photosets
-Decent navigation, model index, and update index, model ratings.
-Photo quality is decent, typically available in three sizes (1200, 2000, 4000)
-Videos are not huge (edited, yay!)
-Video quality is decent (960x540 3500 kbps SD, 1920x1080 16000 kbps HD) SD is pretty crips, HD is very nice. Either Quicktime or wmv.
-3 updates per week, has been very consistent since I've been here
Cons: -Smallish site, 99 models at time of review with typically a couple of photosets per model, not as many of the models have videos - maybe 50% or so.
-Photosets can be short, espicially older sets. Although, in some cases this could be seen as a positive if they removed duplicates and whatnot.
-Videos can also be short, which is probably a con for some, but for the post part I consider it a good thing.
-No bonus content
-No real forum, but you can post comments on sets and there is a blog.
-A lot of toy use in the softcore sets, and not stripping to speak of, many sets start out pretty much nude.
Bottom Line: Overall I think this site is pretty decent. The models are very attractive for the most part and I like the mix of hardcore and softcore materails on a site that focuses a little bit more on eroticism. I definitely like the style of the shoots. I could see how some might complain that the sets are too short of the vidoes are edited pretty substantially, however I find this quite refreshing. Most sites these days post ridiculously long videos with too many closeups and way too much repetitive or unnecessary material (that just ends up wasting hard drive space or wasting my time editing the crap out). So in my opinion it is nice to see a site where they appear to be attempting to trim the sets to the material they think is best.

My main complaint with the site is that it still a little small, and has no bonus content. However, for the price with the PU discount, I think the site is definitely worth joining for a month if you are into well photographed, athletic, young women.

The mix of hardocre and midcore is nice, it would be nice to see a litttle more stripping in the midcore/softcore sets, and given that they have models from all over the place a little more ethnic diversity might be nice as well. While I did like their hardcore material, if this is the only thing you are looking for, this site probably isn't worth joining as there isn't that much of it.

Bottom line for me, with the decent price, I found this site to be worth joining, probably just for a month every now and again, but definitely worth considering.

12-28-10  10:37am

Replies (2)
Comment
34
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Just curious

Is all the material from their old site Beauty is Divine on this site as well, or just some of it? Looking at the preview it seems as though perhaps not...

12-05-10  12:04am

Replies (4)
Comment
35
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Teen glamor site with hardcore edge.

This site has been around for a number of years.
It used to be called "Beauty Is Divine".
At that time it was strictly a softcore teen glamor site. There were no videos that I remember.
Most of the models were really stunning.
The problem was that you only had a small number of photosets, and each photoset had a small number of photos.
Then the name of the site changed a few years ago to "X-art".
They started adding videos to the site.
The videos over the last couple of years or so are becoming hardcore.
The videos have a short runtime, 10 minutes or less.
The videos are very high quality (in lighting, focus, high definition, etc.).
The photosets are also becoming not just softcore, but hardcore as well.
I think the photography of the photos is as good as any major photo site, but some PU members have commented they thought the photography at this site was not excellent.
This site is not a mega-site in the amount of photosets and videos. But almost all the models are extremely attractive. And the videos and photosets are extremely high quality.
There are definitely more photosets than videos at this site, but that is because of the site history, when the site was strictly photosets.
The current updates at the site include both photosets and videos.
The preview pages show you nice-sized thumbnails of many of the covers for the site photosets and videos. The preview could be improved by including sample photos, and by a few sample 1-minute videos, so you could get a clear idea of the quality of the photos and videos.
You will probably wish each photoset had more photos, because the models are mainly lovely, and you want to see more of them.
And the videos, at less than 10 minutes each, seem very short. You will almost certainly wish the videos were longer.
If you like the type of photography at this site, I think the
site is well worth at least a 1 month membership.

I'm thinking of taking this comment, and turning it into a site review, because it sure as hell looks like it could have been written as a site review.

Copyright Nov. 16, 2010, by lk2fireone, in case I do write a review of this site, and the material in this reply is used as the basis for a site review.

11-16-10  05:10pm

Replies (1)
Review
36
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Stunning models
Young only: 18-21
Many unique college girls
Info about each model, and about each pic set or video.
Quality of pictures and videos is excellent
Great mixture: mostly cute college girls, some first time, but some more experienced
Solo, girl-girl and girl-guy action
Female as well as male photographer
choice of picture and video resolutions
good download rates
Cons: Videos are great quality, but rather short.
Pic sets are great quality, but rather short
Went through a period when I had to keep getting a new password, but that seems to be resolved now
Bottom Line: Great perspectives. The main photographers and webmasters are a male/female couple. The larger HD video is excellent and the larger version pictures are big enough to print out giant posters if you wanted...and you could easily cover your walls with drop-dead gorgeous pin-up babes. It's all very high-class and has a very sophisticated feel...and is all the more sexy for it. Well worth a month or two.

11-12-10  11:53am

Replies (6)
Review
37
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Drop-dead gorgeous MET-Art quality nubile models who, for the most part, you haven't seen elsewhere and who are not necessarily eastern european.
* Top quality photo and video shoots, though in smaller quantities than the usual sites.
* Imagine Met-Art with some hc: that's what you get here. There's not much b/g though it's increasing. Fair amount of toy insertion and a bit of soft Met-Art style g/g.
* Virtually no anal, gonzo, or other tasteless stuff.
Cons: * Boy/girl content is very limited but growing.
* No ability to "save" a favorite model.
* No ability to search for particular model types, though with the current relatively small amount of content, this isn't a problem. In fact it's a pleasure to look through the cover shots.
* No slideshow view. This is a must on a photo site of this quality.
* Would love to see a few more models with at least a bit of pubic hair.
Bottom Line: X-Art is that rare thing in the porn world: a truly erotic site. Not only are the models drop-dead gorgeous, but the photographer actually believes in editing. The result is quality, not quantity; eroticism not anatomy. The hc shoots, though limited in number, are tasteful and hot, though there are still far too many of the obligatory facial cum-shots that pervade porn these days. The non-hc content is so sexy that it works for me, even though I usually need a little "more." I also agree with one of the other reviewers that a bit more story-line and less studio shoot would be useful. I'd also love to see some real "behind the scenes" stuff to accompany some of the shoots.

With more hc content and a few more website features like slideshow and save favorite models, I would have given this site a 95. As it is, it's a great site for the price.

10-05-10  10:53am

Replies (2)
Comment
38
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Not disappointed

Thanks to the comments from the kind members here, I had a good idea of what to expect from this site. It's worth noting, however, that the updates appear to be coming every 2-3 days pretty steadily these days as opposed the every 3-4 days previously.

I like the content very much, and I don't regret joining. I'm a big fan of slender models doing girl/girl and solo and good photography, so this site seemed ideal for me. The content is a lot like MET-Art's, but the models are allowed to go where we always wished MET would let their models go and look great doing it. I can't think of any site that has better looking models *and* makes its models look better, MET included, cept perhaps Explicite-Art.

As other reviewers have stated, both the videos and the photo sets are short, and it's hard to tell why. The shoots take a long time to set up, and the models seem into it, and yet things are wrapped up awfully quickly, with a few exceptions. It often seems like such a gratuitous waste, and that may be the only negative I've found. You're kind of left thinking that there's a longer, less chopped-up version that's being sold elsewhere.

While I can't recommend a long-term commitment at this point, it's certainly worth a month's sub, to me anyway. I reckon that I got my 20 bucks worth, and will keep an eye on it to see if it might be worth a return visit later on. If ever they begain daily updates and/or longer videos *of the same quality* then I'd consider a long-term commitment.

06-06-10  06:56am

Replies (2)
Rating
39
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

69.0
No Review.
02-10-10  08:28am

Review
40
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Pros : beautiful models, some of which are the sexiest I have seen in some time. Lily has to get a mention as one of their top models and her videos set is such high quality even if it is very short.There are now 63 very sexy models with photo sets available in 3 sizes.
Cons: Photo quality is totally inconsistent and in many cases very poor consisting of soft or over exposed photos. For HQ photos there is very little detail.
The videoes are too few and again not all of the same high quality as Lily's. They are also very short appprox 3min in duration.
Bottom Line: I as a picture lover fail to see how other reviewers can score this a 95 which puts it in the same bracket as MET ART, Hegre, Femjoy etc which it clearly is not. I have seen photos on all these sites where you can see the very hairs on the models arms and the goose pimples from a cold room used for the photo shoot. These are not of a similar quality nor is there the same volume of models and photos. Bottom line very sexy models but they are being done an injustice. Improve the quality of the photos and this could bea top site but not yet.

02-06-10  07:09pm

Replies (0)
Comment
41
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Confused

This looks ok (great models) at the preview - but certainly NOT sure about the content - NOT from brummies newly review, anyway...

TBP states no videos, except streaming behind the scenes - though the preview say 'videos'. Even read webmasters earlier reply to Drooler - but I'm not more clear here.

Like lk2fireone this user would be gratefull for some usefull info/update - if anyone?

02-05-10  07:49am

Replies (4)
Review
42
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

95.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Beautiful young slim models professionally photographed. Not porn star type models. Young fresh faces enjoying the cameras eye. No cosmetic body enhancements. Video technique improving with time. Increasing use of video.
Cons: Shoots need more of a story line using clothing props. Fantasy build up from clothed to nude instead of too many similar nude shots in one set however beautiful they are. Improved eye contact with camera.
Bottom Line: This site is the best in it's field & improving with each update. I find it very rewarding for my erotic needs & the photographer is open to ideas. Highly recommended.

02-04-10  09:23pm

Replies (4)
Review
43
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: # nice girls
# good quality
# HDV videos
# partial HC content
# functional design
Cons: # HIGH PRICE
# 1 update every 4th day
# small archive
# no bonus contents
Bottom Line: X-art aka Beauty Is Divine was always a great source for inspiration full of angelic looking babes.

I see the change from BID to X-Art with mixed feelings. The additional hc content stays in total contrast to the "old" days and unique contents and make it just another teensite.

I totally disagree with majestix opinion because the price is way to high for a site that updates only every 4th day and offers a small archive.

X-art is for people who do not need a daily update and don't want to miss nicely shaped and flexible teens in quality scenes.

02-01-10  02:11am

Replies (2)
Comment
44
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Site worth joining?

This site has some absolutely yummy models. But as Drooler noted in a comment on July 29, 2009, in spite of the high-quality photos, the quantity of pix seems small. Any recent members have an opinion on whether the site is worth joining for a month? Like I said, some of the models are fucking gorgeous.

01-30-10  10:13am

Replies (0)
Review
45
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Extremely high quality and original content. Photographic style that captures the beauty of the girls. I have never been disappointed by an update. The memberships costs are extremely low for the quality of the content and frequency of updates.
Cons: The updates could contain more photographs but everything that is in the updates is pure quality. No filler shots
Bottom Line: This site has amazing content. Many of the photographs have an editorial quality and uniqueness that is hard to come by. The quality is 2nd to none. I am continually impressed by the quality found at this site. I highly recommend this site.

10-03-09  12:40am

Replies (0)
Comment
46
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(11)

Wasn't Very Impressed

I recently rejoined this site (had joined once before when it was called "Beauty is Divine"). It was better, yet by no great measure in terms of the content.

The photo sizes are larger, but the galleries are usually small and the updates are infrequent. And the site navigation has idiosyncrasies that took some getting used to.

Really, it's pretty much like it was before: If you appreciate artistic nude photography, you might like it.

I gave it a second chance as an erotic photo site and, though there were a small number of things I enjoyed, it didn't satisfy me very much overall.

I'd wait several days for an update; one would finally come; I'd view it and find it lacking. That's how I remember this site.

It would be a mistake for this user to rejoin a third time in the future.

07-29-09  04:52pm

Replies (2)

Shown : 26-46 of 46 Page :    < Previous Page

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.03 seconds.