Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (366)  

Feedback:   All (1196)  |   Reviews (181)  |   Comments (136)  |   Replies (879)

Other:   Replies Received (714)  |   Trust Ratings (88)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 192 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Public Flash

Public Flash

Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic.
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
Cons: -Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
Bottom Line: Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.

08-08-08  11:04am

Replies (0)
Visit Throat Fuck Next Door

Throat Fuck Next Door

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Great price through TBP.
-Part of a network of 14 sites.
-Has 37 videos of about 30-45 minutes each, 56 bonus videos that fit the niche and 24 solo masturbation videos of the same models, about 15 minutes each.
-94 models, of which 7 are Asian and 3 Latina. I would have preferred more variety.
-Very sharp photos. One set for each model, size 1400x933, about 200 kb.
-Has a little variety in the videos. Some had analingus, some had two or three girls and one guy, some had two guys and one girl.
-The sex was forceful oral sex. Strong theme but not degrading such as slapping, choking, puking etc. Definitely not simple blow job sucking with the girl in control.
-Videos available as WMV, 640x480 or MPEG, unfortunately MPEG1 320x240.
-You can download clips or the whole video.
-Bonus strip poker link as well as a link to about 500 erotic stories. The stories were mostly fairly long as well as hot. Definitely as good as those available at Literotica.com.
Cons: -Promised amateurs and DVD quality. I recognized many as pornstars and although the quality was ok, not DVD.
-May not be updating. Not on the list of updates for this month for the network.
-Many of the videos appear to have edited out scenes of non oral sex. Some of the girls have tshirts with other site names on them. Does this mean the videos are nonexclusive?
-Does not support download managers. All files have the same names.
-No way to download zip files of the photos.
-Too much makeup on the girls, on the other hand almost all had natural breasts, not implants.
Bottom Line: I was pleasantly surprised with this site. The sex was mostly interesting even though the girls generally have the usual pornstar overdone look. It also suffered from some videos being shot on a diagonal. Definitely a step above the generic bland bj sites that I have seen. The quantity and quality are at least adequate, but not perfect or even close. More updates with more variety of model ethnicities would make this site better.

08-24-08  08:48am

Replies (1)
Visit Bopping Babes

Bopping Babes

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -New updates every other day.
-561 videos, about 7 minutes each. The site is decent size and actively growing.
-The 2015 videos have 5 download choices with the best quality being 4K.
-The biller is CCBill. Trusted and reliable.
-The models talk to you, but not while they are actually stripping.
-No download limits.
Cons: -The 4K videos did not play in Windows Media Player. They did play using VLC, but with severe stuttering.
-All videos have music that is either hip hop or techno crap. I found this distracting as well as too loud.
-All videos have the same sequence: blouse, skirt, bra, panties. Too formulaic.
-The photos are 1600x900 low quality screenshots. Only 103 photosets compared to over five times as many videos. I saw only landscapes and no portraits. Very uncreative.
-Far too many models are either fake blonds or have excessive tattoos.
-Zero ethnic variety, with only white British models. Other UK based websites include black or Indian models. None from any other European countries either.
Bottom Line: As I discovered ďBoppingĒ means dancing. This website specializes in videos of British women stripping while dancing. Most if not all are porn stars.

The models are all white, with no ethnic variety. On other UK based sites, I have seen black or Indian models and I would expect the same here. There arenít any from other European countries either.

Far too many of the models have tattoos, which is most definitely not to my taste. In some cases the tats are small and not distracting, but there are many that have so many that it is a major deal breaker. Not hot in my book. There are also a pretty fair number of fake blonds, also not my taste. When you factor in that there are other models that I simply donít find appealing, you start with 146 models and only about half interest me at all. There are 561 seven minute videos so that leaves about 250 to 300 or so that I like. That is a good number that includes some knockout models who know how to make stripping truly erotic.

The videos are very sharp, with the most recent coming in at 4K. Unfortunately, I could not get these 4K videos to play on Windows Media Player, but they did using VLC, but with stuttering. In all fairness, HD 1920x1080 works for me so I did not care much.

The photos are zip downloadable, but are only screenshots at 1900x600. Only landscapes and not worth saving.

The models strip out of costumes such as nurse, flight attendant, policewoman, construction worker, student, cheerleader, maid, or office worker. Some strip out of ordinary everyday clothes too. Only a very small number strip out of a bikini or other stereotypical stripper clothes. I liked the choices of costumes.

However, the sequence is always the same: Top or blouse, bottom or skirt, bra, panties. An occasional other sequence would have been hotter. There are very few videos that offer any teasing previews, such as showing panties while still wearing a skirt. Too formulaic and the videos could have easily been improved. Typical problem with porn as they get a great idea, in this case stripping, and then the creative process stops.

I like that the models talk to you and even give jerk off encouragement. Nice interaction wit the viewer. I love hearing them talk as you get a break from the music, which is mostly hip hop or techno crap and played too loud.

For me the bottom line here is that the videos that work are excellent, but could be a little more explicit. In spite of the many videos that do nothing for me, many are quite excellent. With updates every other day the site is growing and I would recommend joining in spite of some glaring weaknesses.

06-28-15  10:42am

Replies (5)
Visit Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-No download limit
-Very large site. TBP review states 1375 video scenes as of May.
-Models are a nice mix of races, ages, body types, you name it. He even has Bridgett the Midget.
-Excellent attempt to modernize the site by remastering the older videos and replacing the older ones. They are presently updating almost daily. In June there were 21 updates in 30 days. There are still many hundreds left to do.
-Works well with download manager. Fast enough downloads and I was able to do six at a time. I did about my max on Verizon Fios, 2.4MB.
-Rodney loves women with pubic hair. For me this is a turn on.
-Rodney loves women, PERIOD. He compliments them, eats their pussies, and generally does whatever it takes to make a scene work for both parties. He makes his partner feel appreciated with a refreshingly respectful approach.
-Nearly every scene is a creative scenario. Some are well done, many are not. Rodney has a sense of humor that is often very effective
Cons: -Prechecked cross sales when you sign up
-Many videos not yet upgraded and are poor quality Quicktime and not downloadable. I could not find specs for these, but they are not watchable. Grainy and tiny, my best guess is something like 240x120 or something along those lines.
-Quite a few videos are not yet downloadable as a whole video, only as MPEG1 clips,barely watchable. No specs for these but are something like 480x320.
-The most recent videos are nowhere near HD at 960x540, 2643 kbps.
-Oldest photos are very poor quality screenshots. These are not zip downloadable either.
-The most recent photo sets are barely acceptable at 1280x800, zip downloadable. Small sets of under 30 photos.
-Confusing navigation. If you want a particular model, she may have a video but you may not see her name listed. Also, some models have inconsistent spelling. The model directory has her as Jynx Maze, but the welcome page has Jinx Maze.
-Rodney loves to worship womenís feet. Not my fetish.
Bottom Line: Rodney Moore specializes in videos where his Rodney blasts are on his partnerís face. He also loves to use women who sport hairy bush. Trimmed, untrimmed, he loves them all. If these are not to your taste, this site is not for you.

If you went to a video store in the 90ís or even the 00Ēs, Rodneyís videos were to be found in large numbers. He had several different series, such as Horny Hairy Girls, Monster Facials and She Swallows. The content is similar in all the videos. He uses a scenario to start the scene. In one he is buying a house and gets the real estate agent to have sex with him. Or, a woman answers an ad for something he is selling. Sometimes he tries to use humor, like finding a woman in the closet or in a garbage can. In total he has more than 1500 scenes, so there is a lot of material that he could eventually post on his site.

In most scenes, there is a lot of foot worship, pussy eating etc. He is very complimentary to the women, telling them how beautiful they are and how much he wants to have sex with them. Many of the models are very attractive, even beautiful, but most are average or a bit better looking. No fake breasts, almost zero tattoos, light or no makeup, they appear to be normal everyday women who appear to be doing just this one video. No stripper clothes or slutty outfits, what you see are women wearing everyday clothes that they take off. There are also some softcore videos of public or semipublic nudity and some that focus on teasing up the skirt or showing their rack, butt or pussy. Nice. Some of the women are porn stars, like one of Sylvia Saint, but most are not. There is vaginal, anal and of course blowjobs. Some of the vaginal is missionary and not the usual way that vaginal is shown.

What is frustrating about the site is that the material is old. The cameras were not the best, so even remastering the videos does not guarantee excellent results. If the original is just ok or poor, the best you can do to improve it is nowhere near HD. Many videos are of very poor quality and cannot be downloaded. That is a shame, as I got the feeling of being tantalized with material that I canít enjoy. Some of it looks very interesting, but non downloadable Quicktime? Many videos are only slightly better, but can be downloaded only as clips. If you want HD, you wont find it on this site. Even the best videos on the site should be watched on a computer screen, but not on an HD TV.

I have read many of us say that pregonzo video was a lot better. Many have stated that they liked some degree of pubic hair. It is easy to fall into the trap of thinking that the past was better just because we donít care for much of todayís porn. The truth is, when I saw these videos I did feel that these were better than what we get today; it is not just nostalgia. It is not that our memory plays tricks on us. If you liked Rodney then, you will like him today as well.

07-08-12  11:40am

Replies (7)
Visit Blow Bob

Blow Bob

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill. However does not take Visa or American Express. I had to use my bank account for the first time ever on any site.
-Six day full access trial for only $15. That is more than enough time to download everything as it is not a huge site and may not even be updating.
-There are 64 models, 32 are Black, five are Latina and the rest are White. Nineteen are most definitely plus sizes, BBW. They do the best blow jobs on this site. Most have multiple videos and photo sets. Bob sure does like bigger women.
-Videos are recently in WMV HD at 1280x720 and many older ones are being remastered. No options as to the download format.
-Wonderful enthusiastic blow jobs as this is the only requirement for being on the site. Bob doesnít care about the models looks, just how well they perform bjs and in some cases hand jobs. I saw only one video out of 158 with vaginal and only one with anal.
Cons: -No zip downloads for small photo sets of about 50 each.
-Newest photos are 1600x1200 and older ones are smaller. Some old sets from 2002 are 340x240.
-No search engine. It is difficult to find what content there is on the site. You can click on a models photo and then it lists what photo sets or videos she has. Not listed alphabetically by models name or by date added to the site. Very simple site design that is not very professional.
-If you are looking for just photo sets, good luck as there is no separate section. There is a section for video clips and there are 158 with each about 10 minutes.
-May not be updating. There is no labeling by date and there is no section of recent updates. The few videos that are mentioned as recent additions have a copyright date of January 2011 on them. The most recent photo sets offered for sale without a membership is copyright June of 2011.
Bottom Line: This site features a man named Bob who runs the site and is almost the only stunt cock. You never see his face and he never takes the focus away from the women. He treats them with total respect and provides interesting model information. He tells you how he met them and how much he enjoys their blow jobs. Sometimes there are some hand jobs to be seen here. The blow jobs are not at all forceful or demeaning as you may see on some sites. No name calling, hair pulling, or spitting. Bob is having a great time and so are his women. His camera work is done by two of his models. It is decent, focused and direct. Some shots are POV and some are from the side. No crazy angles or attempts at making art here, just simple and erotic. Most of the models have pretty faces and with POV you donít see a lot of their sometimes very large bodies. I donít care for BBW much, so I consider that a plus.

What you get are enthusiastic blow jobs by women who love giving their partners pleasure. Bob adores interracial bjís and if you do you will like his videos. The photo sets are mostly of the shoots, but sometimes of the models getting nude from the waist up with mostly very large breasts on display here. A handful of the models are simply beautiful by anyoneís standards, such as Black Barbie. If you go to the tour page she is the statuesque Black model to be seen from the side. A few are a bit older like Hotlips Melanie. She is so enthusiastic in her bjs that I swear she gets more out of them than does Bob. She looks to be in her fifties and is no beauty, but her videos have to be seen to be believed.

The videos are all exclusive and for the most part so are the models. Three or four have their own websites though.

The trial for six days is adequate in that the site is just not that big. It has been around since 2002, so I donít think it ever updated often. It may not even be updating any more. If you insist on paying entirely too much, you can skip a membership and buy 60 to 80 minute videos for about $27, or individual photo sets at about $7 to $9.

Nice content, but a site with a lot of flaws and is just not very big.

05-28-12  11:37am

Replies (2)
Visit African Goddesses

African Goddesses

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful African models. Some are thin, but most are amazingly voluptuous with beautiful faces and extra large breasts. Nothing fake or artificial here.
-Amateurs. All the models appear only on this site.
-The videos are nearly all stripping from either lingerie or ethnic African outfits. Very exotic.
-Works with download managers
-No interviews. The models don't even speak. The videographer is never in the video nor do you hear them.
-The models look directly at you and don't ever look bored, jaded or mechanical.
Cons: -Billing is through an unusual biller and no billing choices are available.
-Your password is sent to you at your email address. This concept worked, but every time you log in, you must reenter the password.
-The photos are small at 1024x768.
-No zipdownload option.
-The picture sets are small. Most are less than 50 photos, some as few as 10.
-The videos download, but with only one option. They are in WMV 640x480, but reasonably sharp considering they are not HD.
-Barely updating. See below.
Bottom Line: This site is of softcore photos and stripping videos of natural African women. The focus is on some of the most beautiful women on the planet.

I was last a member in August of 2008. In the nearly three and a half years that have passed, I have found my appreciation for the videos has remained. I really want to love this site as its content is wonderful.

How can I describe its contents? I love what they have. The women make the site. However, there is no sex, not even masturbation. The nudity is very tasteful, something like Playboy style. Tease is a key word here. Personally, I would prefer a litle more explicitness, but the site is made so that it leaves some to the imagination.

However, it has some very serious negatives. The worst is that it almost is a zombie site, with only three updates in 2011 and three in 2010. In the past, there were 11 in 2009, 16 in 2008, 20 in 2007 and 22 in 2006.

Further, the video quality is only 640x480. They were watchable, but I hope for better. The photos are also out of todays expectations, coming in at 1024x768.

I get the feeling that the site's owners don't care much about making the site better.

I would definitely recommend the site if you love this type of content. However, I waited three and half years between sign ups and the site is almost the same with about 20 updates. I can't see joining in less than another few years.

02-22-12  11:38am

Replies (7)
Visit Bukkake Bath

Bukkake Bath

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Works with Downthemall.
-No download limit.
-Has 483 bukkake, gangbang and gokkun (cum eating or swallowing) censored dvds, most scenes over an hour. Of these, 379 are full scenes at 720x480, 1480 kbps. the rest are only in parts and the quality varies, but definitely a bit less.
-Has 82 censored big breast dvds. Large by anyone's standards, huge by Japanese. Most around DD to G cups.
-66 female ejaculalion censored dvds.
-Has 60 urabon (uncensored) dvds
-Has a directory of Japanese adult film stars
-10,516 photos. Poor quality screenshots that are mostly facial vidcaps. Average around 500x700 and blurry.
Cons: -The videos are at barely acceptable quality.
-The photos are not worth bothering with.
-The navigation here is a nightmare as there is no search engine. Everything is in chronological order only.
-Unclear how often it updates. It appears that dvds are added daily though.
Bottom Line: Within the field of Japanese dvd videos, this site specializes more than anything else in the specific niche of bukkake, gangbang and gokkun, which is cum eating. As such, they claim to be the largest site on the internet with such content. Prior to joining this site, I was a trial member of Asiamoviepass, a bigger site overall and with almost as much of this specific content.

The videos are of course not exclusive. The dvd's are not specifically shot for any site, so many can be found on other Japanese sites. What you get here is an undeniably huge collection that specializes in one particular niche though.

In spite of censorship, the videos are quite entertaining in that the focus is on cum shots and cum eating. As only genitals are blurred, the videos are not censored to the point of ruining the eroticism. The very large number of guys involved makes for some extreme scenes. Fifty to 100 guys is not unusual and drinking the resulting huge amounts of cum is not uncommon. Some scenes are quite creative, although in most scenes the model just sits on the floor and the guys cum on her face and body. Many scenes are all too predictable.

Since most scenes average around a gigabyte, you have to be selective regarding what you want to save. I saved about 100 dvd's, which is only a small percentage of the site. However, over 100 GB is plenty in my opinion.

There are also 104 dvd's that are of lower quality and are split into parts. Many of these are in the process of being recoded to higher quality. Some scenes are from the US dvd series American Bukkake. Other scenes feature other Western women and come from other dvd series that I don't recognize.

My overall impression here is that it is an older site with low quality, but large considering that it is a niche site. It is a bit behind the times as a site, but the dvds are most definitely interesting and entertaining.

06-30-11  08:08am

Replies (2)
Visit Body Parts.biz

Body Parts.biz

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill.
-Frequent updates. "UPDATE SCHEDULE: Softcore Video Clips - Three times/week. Hardcore Video Clips - Twice/week. Softcore Photos - Three times/week. Hardcore Photos - Once/week. Amateur Photos - Three times/week. Body Parts Photos - Three times/week. Amateur Video - Three times/week."
-Really large site. I counted 774 videos, most about 2 minutes. There are 928 photosets and 140 models.
-Videos are HD at 1280x720, 3776 kbps. At this level five to seven minute videos are close to 1GB.
-Works with download managers.
-Not done in glam style. The models, aged 18 to 25, look very real, although not all are amateurs.
-Many hairy bushes although most are shaved.
-A few have tattoos, but no fake breasts.
-Some ethnic variety, but none in body shape as nearly all are very thin.
Cons: -Many of the videos are clips of a longer one, which is not offered as whole video. The video count is deceptive. My best guess is that the actual count is about 250 to 350.
-Photo sets are not zipdownloadable. Advertised as 2400x1600, they are often grainy. I used 1200x800, which is not that good. Many photos were still grainy.
-The photo sets are very repetitious. After a few sets, a closeup of a vagina looks like the last closeup of one.
Bottom Line: This site is run by Frannie Addams, who is the photographer, videographer and apparently the only one who works on the site. She has a blog where she makes entries once a month. In it she talks about upcoming additions to the site, which sounds like advertising if you ask me. There is no user interaction.

The focus here is on as she calls it "the closest close-ups on the web". The photos and videos feature breasts, butts, and especially, vaginas. Interestingly, she also realizes that the tongue and mouth in erotic poses can be highly stimulating. I have rarely seen softcore shots like this, although occasionally as part of blow job scenes.

With the videos in HD quality, sometimes the closeups are a bit too much. I don't care to see every pore or even each individual hair. However, it is not as much a gynecolgy lesson as is inthecrack.com.

The comparison here is a fair one. I believe these two sites are the only ones that use the up close focus. Inthecrack.com focuses to a large degree on butt views, whether of the ass crack or the vagina. This site has a few of these photos and videos, but its focus is on the vagina full frontal. Both are big sites, both are in HD and both can be hit and miss regarding the erotic. This site bills itself as amateurs, but I think most are pornstars or professional models. I know I recognized many and found a few more on the internet. The approach is one of natural looking models, not glam as inthecrack.com uses. Here most, if not all, models are American. Inthecrack.com has Europeans as well as Americans. Just my opinion, but I liked this site better despite its flaws.

The site is big enough and is high quality in its videos. In contrast, the photo sets are somewhat disappointing in quality. Although I can enjoy closeups of body parts, sometimes the focus is just TOO focused and misses that special intangible quality that makes a model work for me.

06-17-11  09:24am

Replies (0)
Visit Bare Maidens

Bare Maidens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Inexpensive considering the high quality photos and videos and the size of the site.
-Downloadable videos are true HD 1920x1080, 4220 kbps. Crisp, clear and beautiful.
-Zip downloadable photosets. The better quality option comes in at 3450x4000.
-Mostly if not all American pornstars listed by first name only.
-Huge website. They claim it has 33 movies and 66,536 photos. I could not find that many videos, but this may be the true number. See below for comments about this.
Cons: -No choices as to video format. FLV is what you get. You may need a new video player for that as most will not work with these videos.
-Most videos have a long introduction to the sex part. Makes for huge files on your hard drive.
-Many of the photos are not all that explicit. Very softcore fantasies for the most part. In all fairness there are also some that include sex.
-Many photosets are so artistic that you may think they forgot that you came to the site to see women, not special effects.
-No way to search. The only way content is listed is under the model's name.
-Updates are not dated nor are they easy to find.
The site claims updates every three days and this is impossible to verify.
Bottom Line: This site is so unique that I feel it has no competition. It creates a fantasy world similar to that of Lord Of The Rings, Dungeons and Dragons, and World of Warcraft.

The action takes place on the planet Arta, and features its women who seek the power called Magice. They mostly get it by masturbating, but also from sex with both men and women. As a result, the site mostly features masturbation scenes in the videos. The photos are mostly nudes and stripping to nudity from outfits that come from this fantasy genre. Some examples are helmets, cloaks, and chainmail.

Sounds wonderful so far, but this site has a few flaws. One is that it is difficult to find the downloadable videos as they don't have a separate section. There is a link called "Theatre", which features streaming low quality videos. Read Maggies review and you will see she thought there were no videos to download. I don't think I got them all as I found 24 and the site claims 33.Considering the size of the site, navigation just should not be this difficult.

Downloads are slow on Internet Explorer, using IDM, about 500 to 600kbps. On Mozilla I used DTA and got about the same. I asked the webmaster about this and he claimed the usual speed is over 1MB per second. I also tried Google Chrome with IDM and got the speed he claims is usual.

Another problem is that the videos come in only one format-FLV. The webmaster suggested using Adobe Movie. Adobe's website states that the program has not been available since last December. I tried to find FLV players on the web, but none worked all that well. Eventually I converted the videos to WMV and lost a lot of the quality in the conversion. This took hours of effort on my part.

You may not care about all of this if your reason for joining is the photosets. The quality is most definitely first rate, although I thought most of the photos were more about the fantasy world than erotic. I did not join to see artistic special effects. There are a lot of photosets, as the site is more a photo one than a video one. Five years worth of updates makes for plenty to look at.

I give this site high scores for creativity, the high quality of both photos and videos and sheer size. If they only made the videos easier to find as well as downloadable in WMV or even AVI, this site could easily be worth in the 90's.

05-13-11  11:46am

Replies (1)
Visit ATK Exotics

ATK Exotics

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-Huge mega website. The site states over 1400 models and over 950,000 photos.
-Daily updates. The site states 4200 photos added weekly.
-The photos are zipdownloadable.
-No download limits.
-More Black models than any site I have ever seen, even including those specializing in them.
-The number of East Indian models is quite large. There are few on any site on the internet and this site is probably the biggest on the net for these women.
-Many well known models/pornstars. However most of the site appears to be amateurs who may be exclusive here.
-Listing of who the photographers are for each set. I found that I really appreciate R. Williams for example.
Cons: -Far too many tattoos and/or piercings.
-Not high quality videos. The most recent are 850x480, 1700 kbps. Way behind the times.
-Photos are nearly all about 600x1000 and some are 1600x1000. Many, many sites have better.
-Too many sets that are washed out color, overexposed, have little contrast, or miss the erotic by having the models' hands strategically placed where I don't want them. Many cut off parts of the model's body and look unnatural and definitely not erotic. For set after set I did not download a single photo.
-The search engine is virtually useless. I have no idea how many Black models there are for example.
Bottom Line: I was last a member here about four years ago. At that time I thought the site was very large, the videos mostly boring and of low quality and the task of downloading to be intimidating without some kind of search engine.

Mostly that is still all true. With daily updates the site has become HUGE though.

I appreciate that the site has so many ethnic models. I know of no other site that I can compare this to as far as quantity. My issue is much more with the quality.

The videos are mostly not all that. The softcore are mostly very blabby and the hardcore not terribly hot either. There are some masturbation scenes, blow jobs and some vaginal, but that is it. There is no anal for example.

The photos are mostly not my cup of tea either. There are too many where the fundamentals just are not what I expect from such a well known megasite. Some things that are not done right are photos that have the colors not adjusted properly, or have little contrast, are too dark, etc. Black models in dark photos just don't work. Neither do photos that have one after another of the model's hand covering her vagina. When did that become hot?

The search engine is useless. This was a problem four years ago and still is now. The various ethnicities make searches a matter of luck. I have seen the same model being labelled East Indian, Island, Black, Dime Pieces, Soft Core, Hard Core, Public, meaning outdoors etc. If you search solely by ethnicity you get lists by volume, with models in it that have no logical reason at all. I think they are listed in each volume because of the release date.

Far too many models have tattoos or piercings. I did a completely unscientific study of the Black models that I have so far downloaded. Of these 104, 41 had either tattoos or piercings. Some have both. Some are small and discrete, but far too many have multiple tattoos and most of these models have these tattoos on the abdomen, thighs, breasts, near their breasts, etc. UGH!, Not for me. At least I did not find any at all with fake breasts.

Overall I liked most of the models and most of the photography. What I feel is that the site needs to be rethought as to what goes into it and how to be more user friendly. Right now it seems to be too big to make sense.

02-22-11  07:02am

Replies (9)
Visit Eat Some Ass

Eat Some Ass

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Discount through TBP.
-Has three other sites that come with it-spunkmouth, jizzonmyglasses and handjob.tv.
-Unusual niche. Very few websites specialize in this content. Ask me about others if you are curious.
Cons: -No zipdownload option for photos. 800x1200 is the best they have to offer.
-Most recent photoset shows photos taken 4/15/2006. This photoset is of Veronica Rayne who retired on June 11, 2010. She was active from 2005 to 2010.
-So I suspect that the site is no longer updating, in spite of the site stating daily updates.
-The "DVD quality" videos are 640x480, 1059 kbps. Not up to today's standards. Sounds like specs for 2006.
-Daily download limit of 3 GBs, then 24 hours until you can download again.
-No use of download managers allowed. However, Downthemall worked without any problems
Bottom Line: This site features mostly well known pornstars giving blow jobs and eating ass. Most scenes also have vaginal and a few even include anal.

While the ass eating is the focus here, in most videos it is only about five minutes at most out of a video of about 20 minutes.

For the most part the females are attractive well known pornstars such as Bree Olsen or Kelly Wells. The action ranges from all out enthusiasm such as in the video by Kelly Wells, to others who don't show much interest at all.

Because there are so few sites that feature this kind of action, I felt that I had to overlook some valid criticisms, such as low quality videos, an inability to zipdownload photos and a lack of updates, in figuring out a score. Unfortunately the other few sites that this can be compared to are also very weak. Unlike those, this site does not have the girls cover the guys ass in something like honey or chocolate syrup. Some may like that, but I have to draw the line at food.

The other sites that come with this one feature blow jobs on spunkmouth and jizzonmy glasses. Jizz I liked a bit better than spunkmouth. The other site, handjob.tv I found to be boring. The video quality and site design are identical for all these sites.

As far as this site, it is ok with some interesting videos in an unusual and hard to find niche. They could use a design overhaul as well as more and better quality videos.

01-05-11  06:35am

Replies (0)
Visit Fantasy Female Fights

Fantasy Female Fights

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Unusual niche.
-Very attractive women for the most part.
-Sexy English accents.
-Nice quality videos. The most recent are 960x540, 4068 kbps. Not HD but sharp. Even the older videos are quite watchable.
Cons: -Some fake boobs and or tattoos.
-Poor acting, not very realistic fights.
-The dull photos don't do justice to the action. They are zipdownloadable, but only 960x1440.
Bottom Line: This is an unusual niche, so felt I had to cut it some slack regarding my score. Although there are a few other female fighting sites, few are any good.

In these videos we see British pornstars and nude models fight with each other. In many cases, they start off nude. In others there is a bit of clothing that comes off by the end of the fight. I liked these better.

The fighting is hesitant and definitely tentative. In only a few cases do these models really get into the spirit and show some real enthusiasm. Sometimes the action is so transparently not real that it would make a WWE wrestler blush-and that is not easy.

At about five minutes per video, I felt that they were long enough. Many of the videos were so similar that I thought that I had seen them before. Not true, its just that there isn't much variety in the plots.

The true plus here is the quality of the models. With cute English accents, they generally are quite pretty with bodies that make you forget about the negatives to the site.

My feeling is that the site is worthwhile if you enjoy topless,some full nudity, and almost no cases of lesbian sex. If you want more, Ultimate Surrender is a much better site.

12-22-10  08:52am

Replies (5)
Visit Secretease


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Inexpensive with two day, twelve day and monthly options.
-CCbill without regional pricing.
-High quality photos at 3000x2009.
-Photo sets are zipdownloadable. BUT, there is a daily limit of 16 photo sets.
-Long strip sets that end in explcit shots. Not really nude as the models usually still wear some clothing.
Cons: -No videos, only photo sets.
-Many sets end with less than explicit nudity.
-The site is still too small. With photo set updates every four days, eventually this site will get much bigger.
Bottom Line: Like many sites from the UK, this one focuses on clothing and teasing. The outfits are sexy, most models are sexy, but not outstanding.

One big negative is that the site is just too small to stay more than at most the 12 day trial. With updates every four days, it should become a bargain at this price in 2011.

Another negative is that there is a daily download limit on zipdownloading the sets. I got only three models as the limit is 16 sets. I found this when I reached the limit, as the site nowhere mentions this. I would appreciate knowing the rules before I sign up, not after. I did not find any limit on individual photos though. As the site grows, this will become increasingly tedious.

For me another negative is that there are too many fake blondes. Most of the models on the site are reasonably attractive, but there just aren't many knockouts out of the 25 models.

What I did like were the slow strip sets. The feeling is one of building up as you go along. With well done photography, I enjoyed the quality of the photos.

Overall not a bad site for the price.

11-07-10  09:40am

Replies (4)
Visit Japanese Flashers

Japanese Flashers

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Nice discount through TBP.
-Part of a network of 17 Japanese sites. Easy navigation between network sites wihout reentering passwords.
-No download limits.
-Download manager friendly.
-Videos can be streamed or downloaded with MP4, MPEG or as small files AVI. Nice quality but not HD.
-Low quality screencaps can be downloaded as a zipfile.
-The Japanese manage to get great looking women into their movies. Paying them well and giving them respect makes hot looking women willing to do movies that are truly hot.
Cons: -Non exclusive. I have seen some of this before.
-The site is still small despite updates a few times a week.
-Some videos are not nude. I am not refering to the mosaics, I mean they don't take off clothing.
Bottom Line: This site features videos from Japanese DVD's. Most feature nudity, but some do not. None of the videos are uncensored and without a mosaic.

That being said, some of the videos work quite well and many do not. The problem with flashing even in explicit sites is that all you get is nudity. The ones that work would be great models for non Japanese porn as they take everyday situations, such as school graduations and fill the screen with half naked women as an example. Sometimes they are only topless and then the scene switches to only bottomless. The videos do that with other scenes, such as offices and classrooms. There are many group scenes of gymnastics, track and field, etc as well. This can be hot, but some scenes where women walk down the street seem unreal and staged.

Like other Japanese porn the creativity can make up for the lack of uncensored videos. This site is hit and miss as well as a bit small. If you like Japanese flashing join deluxepass.com. Not only is there a lot more of it in its own site within deluxepass, but it also includes most of what is on this site.

08-30-10  10:06pm

Replies (8)
Visit Pure CFNM


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Mostly great looking hot women in great outfits that show off their legs or have partially open blouses that show cleavage. Some shots are upskirt showing their panties, which also is sexy. There is no explicit nudity, but plenty of tease.
-Many blowjob scenes by groups of women.
-Weekly updates.
-The archive goes back to 2005 with 228 scenes.
-Photoset for every video.
-Somewhat active forum that encourages members to suggest scenes as well as other improvements.
Cons: -Regional pricing through CCBill.
-The most recent updates are at 856x480, 3130 kbps. Nice but not HD.
-Photos recently are at 800x534 and are not zipdownloadable.
-Too many scenes are only handjobs.
-Sometimes their English accents are incomprehensible.
-Needs a search engine. Some models are in multiple scenes and the listings are only in chronological order.
Bottom Line: I was last a member of this site two years ago and decided to go back. Besides growing with one new scene added per week, the focus seems to have changed somewhat as well. There used to be many scenes of male humiliation, such as laughing at his small cock, leaving him unsatisfied and laughing as the models walk away, etc. There are still some recent updates with those themes, but not many. Now there are many more scenes of blow jobs, especially by groups of up to four women. In my book that is a distinct improvement.

The scenes seem to be male fantasies for the most part. A man wolf whistles at four women passing by and then they all give him a blow job for example. I feel the fact that they are clothed adds to the fantasy quality. I know not everyone agrees that clothed can be hot. Let's face it, who doesn't like to see pussy, ass and breasts? However, clothed gorgeous women makes a scene seem like it could really happen and that the women are pleased to make men get off. After all, in most scenes what are they getting out of it? They genuinely seem to be having fun, but no physical pleasure. Not a single fake orgasm on the site and no fake moaning either.

In many cases I wish that I could have seen the women's bodies as well. Most are nude on other English websites, so this is possible.

I feel that the site is the best I have seen in the CFNM(clothed female naked male)niche. Compared to others, the content as well as the women are hotter, but there is definitely a need for better quality videos and photos. At a minimum, the photos should be zipdownloadable.

08-13-10  07:23am

Replies (2)
Visit British Tease

British Tease

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No download limits or DRM
-Full strip to nude content
Cons: -Maybe half of the photo sets are zipdownloadable
-Photos are available only as 800x1200. Nearly all are portrait as few are landscape.
-Videos are unwatchable at 352x288 and dull.
-The site has not updated since October 2008.
Bottom Line: The site is about British models stripping to nude. Nearly everything here is softcore stripping, but you will also find some scenes with toys, as well as b/g and g/g hardcore.

I liked that the sets showed women in various outfis that had a full strip sequence. There was a decent focus on teasing as well. The toys, b/g and g/g scenes were few but also interesting.

The photo sets had no download choices and were mostly of moderate not high quality at 800x1200.
These were enjoyable, but the models were only slightly better than average looking amateurs. On the site it says they are encouraged to get explicit, but they always have a choice as to how far they will go. As a result, many sets are nude, but without much to see between their legs. Most scenes are very tame, but nice strip sequences.

My biggest complaint is with the lack of updates. The site is moderately sized and can be downloaded in a couple of days. There is no reason to go for anything longer than a month. Too bad they did not have a full access trial, as that would have been a long enough term.

A good site for what it is, but there are plenty of bigger and better sites for only a few dollars more.

03-31-10  08:03am

Replies (2)
Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens

Grandpas Fuck Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated: 03-03-10  10:36am  (Update History)
Reason: rethought score
Pros: -Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.
Cons: -Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.
Bottom Line: I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.

In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.

In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.

More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.

I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.

This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.

03-03-10  09:10am

Replies (7)
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.
Cons: -Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.
Bottom Line: After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.

02-21-10  09:10am

Replies (9)
Visit Penthouse


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge website. See Maggie's review for more details. The archives go back to 1973.
-Nearly every model extremely beautiful. I can't think of a site at this level so consistently.
-Many and I mean many, models have trimmed bush. I found this extremely hot. Since these are the oldest photo sets, most have low quality, but I still appreciated them.
-Quick downloads without restriction if you pay for the gold membership. At the silver level you get only five downloads per day. This option makes no sense on a site of this size.
-All exclusive material of many who went on to become big name models and/or pornstars. The site has some very well known names in exclusive photo sets. For example, Tera Patrick was Pet of the Year.
-Daily updates, sometimes even multiple updates.
Cons: -The photographic style is very much of the glamour type. A lot of artistic shots and not many are explicit. This made me search a lot for what I want to keep.
-Most photo sets are rather small, about a dozen photos each.
-No way to zipdownload the photo sets. I am happy to say there is a way. See Pink Panther's reply. This is one time I am glad to be wrong.
-I prefer videos to photos, so I did not appreciate the low quality of the videos.
-Needs ethnic variety. I saw only one Black model and only a few, maybe six Asian ones.
-Membership ends when you cancel. You don't get the remaining time that you have paid for.
Bottom Line: I rather enjoyed this site. It has so much to offer that I feel confident recommending it. I subscribed to the magazine in the 70"s and loved it then. I still apreciate their style, so trying their website was a natural.

I am more into videos than photos, so this site has a major flaw that keeps me from giving it a score in the 90's. The video quality is too low to watch on a HD television.

However, the pluses here are the consistent beauty of the models, the sheer quantity of the photos and their overall quality-some older photos are of lower size and resolution. The photo sets are solo, masturbation, b/g hardcore and softcore and g/g lesbian and softcore. I saw peeing photo sets, some where the girls were smoking and even some softcore bondage. If you can imagine something, it probably is here somewhere.

For me, another big plus was that since the archive goes back to 1973, there are huge numbers of photos where the models have trimmed bush. I enjoyed this site a LOT more than ATK Hairy, for example.

Just like the magazine, there is a section for erotic letters, an advice section, as well as a forum. Additionally there is a live chat option, a video store and VOD.

If you are into photos and don't care if the videos are weak, this site is one you must try.

11-15-09  09:31am

Replies (11)
Visit Face Fucking Inc

Face Fucking Inc

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-Access to 29 site network.
-Very attractive women. Not a plus I put in many reviews. Includes many Asians, but only one Black model.
-103 WMV videos. At their best 720x480, 2564kbps. Watchable, but not a big plus as I expect HD by now.
-Reasonably small file sizes. Most are 200 to 400 MB, 15 to 25 minutes.
-No DRM or download limits. I did not encounter a single broken link.
-Download managers supported.
-Updates are irregular, but are close to one a week.
Cons: -Sloppy navigation and schizophrenic search engine. For example, I see 20 photo sets, but when you try to go to the next page (three are listed) you go back to the movie archives.
-Mentions on the tour that billing choices include CCBill and Epoch. I was never given these choices when I signed up though.
-Nonexclusive. All scenes have come from already released DVD's put out by Evil Angel.
Bottom Line: This site is part of the Evil Angel network. As such it features slick production values and is mostly if not all American pornstars. On a superfical level it appears as standard gonzo as there seem to be the same homes, pools, etc. that you usually see. The models are dressed similarly to gonzo style as they wear unnatural stripper clothing. I prefer a bit more reality than this.

The scenes are not the standard gonzo though. Although there is only a small touch of creativity to the scenarios, the action is not as predictable as you see in boring gonzo. Many scenes have only forceful mouth fucking, while others have various types of b/g sex, but the emphasis is on the throat fucks. Some scenes feature two women or two men. Scene by scene, there are a few things that are not quite by the numbers. For example, some scenes have interviews, but others do not. Some scenes are more specific to the niche than others.

As far as the content, it is forceful, but there is almost no slapping, spitting, or other abuse. Comparing it to facialabuse.com or gagfactor.com, it is quite a bit lighter than either. It is not as extreme as gagfactor.com, which in turn is a lot lighter than facialabuse.com. The tone of the first two is of abuse, even to the point of being mysoginistic. Not here. The women appear to be faking that they are enjoying being used. Further, compared to those two sites, the models are very much more attractive.

Compared to your average blow job site, this is a bit extreme though. It all depends on what you prefer.

I really like HD quality and there just isn't any of that here. I would also like to see a useful search engine. The site is one that I would recommend overall, for those who like to see a bit of extra zip in their blow jobs.

11-04-09  09:52am

Replies (3)
Visit Gag Factor

Gag Factor

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-Weekly updates
-Easy navigation, but no search engine
-Photo sets for every video, however the photos are at best 750x500.
-Extreme throat fucking
-No download limits, DRM or broken links.
-Supports download managers with fast downloads.
Cons: -Too expensive for the quality and quantity of content. Comes with only one other site, americanbukkake.com.
-Sparse download options. WMV or streaming as weaker WMV. Can download clips that are 320x240.
-The videos posted after February 2008 are at best 720x480, 2000 kbps. That is ok, but hardly hi def. The videos from 2004 to 2008 were all useless as they were at best 320x240.
Bottom Line: Everything here has been released on DVD before. The models are nearly all pornstars, with very few amateurs.

This site is about forceful throat fucking. There is nothing kind or gentle; it is about male gratification. Using mostly pornstars, the action is quite strong.

The closest comparison that comes to mind is facialabuse.com. The videos here are of much lower quality, but they are still definitely watchable. Facialabuse emphasizes nonsexual turnoffs such as vomiting, face slapping and spitting, but here there is a lot less of that. I would describe the action as facialabuse light. While there is still some of these featured, there is so much less that the tone of the site is dramatically different.

On facialbuse the cumshots are from at least two guys and are on the model's face. It is portrayed as the ultimate humiliation. Here, in stark contrast, the cum shots are inside her mouth while it is closed. It is only when she shows it to you that you know that the scene is over. This seems much more like a real blow job.

This site is about fun for the viewer. The models don't seem disturbed by the action and some even say in an interview they are looking forward to it. I find that a bit hard to believe, but remember these are pornstars. Unlike amateurs, they are used to pretending they enjoy sex that they are actually doing only for the money. You get the feeling in many videos that the action is staged and preplanned. Compared to the vomiting scenes on facialabuse, I can live with that. A bit less reality is fine with me. Here they take a throat pounding and appear to be none the worse for wear. No limp, worn out models who will never be willing to do porn again.

Some scenes start off slowly with a normal bj and then it gets a bit forceful. In contrast, in some you get action that seems angry or that happens after the couple was arguing at the beginning of the scene. Some scenes even have outdoor introductory parts before the action begins. Often there is even a shred of a plot. The contrast is refreshing in that so much porn seems always the same. Seeing the participants interact is always a plus for me.

The only serious negative is that the videos before February 2008 are of unwatchable quality. The site has 75 videos of higher quality, each about 8 to 12 minutes long and updates weekly.

I would have rated the site higher if it had HD quality videos, more amateurs and more scenes with either two males or two females. A lower price would make this more attractive as well.

10-28-09  06:47am

Replies (4)
Visit Latina Abuse

Latina Abuse

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-No DRM or download resrictions. With files about 1 GB each this is the only way to go.
-Hi Def videos in 1080P are available. Some of the best on the internet. So real you feel you are really there.
-81 Videos, about a half hour to 45 minutes. Short concise interviews of maybe 3 minutes each.
-Excellent videography. No diagonals, never a focus on the wrong part of the room. They seem to never miss the right shot to display the action.
-Supports download managers. Lightning fast downloads. I max out at 2.5MB
-Photosets for nearly every video.
-Almost all real first time amateurs. I recognized only two pornstars. As you might imagine the amateur's attractiveness varies, but they lend a touch of reality as they are not acting. No fake reactions, moaning, overacting, etc. Only a few, I counted only two, have tattoos.
-Part of a huge network of 22 good size websites.
Cons: -The site shows little, if any, respect for the women. Too much spitting, face slapping, and verbal abuse.
-No search engine, yet the models are on multiple sites in the network.
-Constant stream of emails from the network as a former member. When they offer a discounted price, you get maybe 12 to 15 emails telling you. I signed up as a member during a promotion and still got multiple last chance offers.
Bottom Line: This is a sister site to facialabuse.com and ghettogaggers.com. The focus here is on Latinas.

You don't get slick cookie cutter videos as you see on sites such as 8thstreetlatinas.com. What you do get is very forceful rough sex with a focus on face fucking. If you like facialabuse.com or ghettogaggers.com, you get the same type of videos. Check reviews of those sites for more details.

The models are nearly all amateurs. Most are quite attractive, natural looking and are a step above the quality to be found on facialabuse and ghettogaggers. As you might guess with amateurs, the quality varies.

Recent videos have much higher quality, with downloads at their best at 1080p. Unfortunately this is only 38 of the 81 videos. The rest are much lower quality with many at 340x240.

However, the site has been very actively posting in 2009 with 24 new videos. This is less than 1 per week, but better than other sites in the network. In contrast with these other sites, all the newest postings are available immediately for download. On the other sites, they have recently implemented a policy of making members wait for 28 days before they can download.

All in all, a good addition to a network of sites that is quite large. However, the rough sex is undoubtedly not for everybody.

10-20-09  10:59am

Replies (1)
Visit Facial Abuse

Facial Abuse

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-No DRM or download resrictions. With files about 1GB each this is the only way to go.
-Hi Def videos in 1080P are available. Some of the best on the internet. So real you feel you are really there.
-Videos are about a half hour to 45 minutes. Short concise interviews of maybe 3 minutes each.
-Excellent videography. No diagonals, never a focus on the wrong part of the room. They seem to never miss the right shot to display the action.
-Supports download managers. Lightning fast downloads. I max out at 2.5MB
-Photosets for nearly every video.
-About 85% real first time amateurs. As you might imagine their attractiveness varies, but they lend a touch of reality as they are not acting. No fake reactions, moaning, overacting, etc. Some have tattoos, but most don't,and very few fake tits. The pornstars are generally a-list and very experienced.
-Huge site, huge network. The site has 174 videos, probably 200 GB of videos. The network has 22 websites.
Cons: -The site shows little, if any respect for the women. Too much spitting, face slapping, and verbal abuse.
-No search engine, yet the models are on multiple sites in the network.
-There is a new policy on the site to have streaming only videos for 28 days. Downloads are available after that.
-Constant stream of emails from the site as a former member. When they offer a discounted price, you get maybe 12 to 15 emails telling you. I signed up as a member during a promotion and still got multiple last chance offers.
-Slow to nonexistent customer service. It took days to get an answer as to the download policy and never got an answer as to why I was having log in problems.
Bottom Line: This is my fourth membership to the site and it has changed a lot over the past 5 years. It always was a bit extreme, but now it has become downright sadistic and abusive. I like BDSM, but this seems to be over the line as well as nonconsensual.

In the past the focus was on male pleasure without much concern for the models. It was pure fantasy come to life. After a while, they attracted a few pornstars and the attitude changed. They brought it to them with an increase in roughness and abusiveness. If you were a pornstar, you already knew their reputation for this. I felt it was hard to feel sorry for them as this is the profession they chose. Further, it was clear that they knew exactly what to expect.

As time passed and the recession started, it seems that they chose to get rough with the amateurs in the same way they were with the established pornstars. They were the proverbial deer in the headlights. Many interviews show that the models were excited, anxious, or even thrilled to be making porn. By the end of the video, they are generally angry and feel this was more than too much. Most complain how the shoot went and how they felt abused. Specificaly, they are repeatedly slapped, sometimes very hard, choked until they turn red, forced to get throat fucked when it is clear they cannot breathe, no lube or warmup for anal, have their own vomit dumped on their heads or smeared on their faces, have their faces forced into their vomit on the floor, etc. They more resemble rag dolls than participants. In the past, if they wanted a break it was ok. Not any more.

I think the change is due to the recession. There were fewer customers, even with discounted prices and additional websites. The response was more intense marketing to the point of annoying the hell out of fans like me, holding back for 28 days after a video has been posted before we can download in an attempt to keep us longer without giving us more content, and a move towards more extreme roughness and abusiveness.

My advice is to learn from the example of Max Hardcore. The site is located in New Jersey, which has not had a court case to establish whether it is legal to film porn there. If they continue to get even rougher, the problem may be a lot bigger than losing a few longtime customers.

10-14-09  07:56am

Replies (6)
Visit Asian American Girls

Asian American Girls

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill
-No DRM. However, some videos have links to videos that don't fully download.
-Fairly large site. Has over 700 videos and about as many photo sets. The exact number is difficult to get at due to the site setup. For example if a model is Thai and Chinese, she may be found under both categories.
-Good quality videos. Some are advertised as HD, but the best I found was 854x480, 2400 kbps. One is listed as 640x480, 10000 kbps, but it is grainy. Most videos are fairly decent and fairly sharp.
-Nice quality sharp photo sets. The best I found was 1280x854. The sets feature a nice progression, not one after another that are very similar. Very professional with a lot of great shots, but not in a glamour style. I am not a photo guy, but I liked these.
Cons: -Many models not attractive. The site features amateurs, so there are many not deserving being
on any site. However, the plus is that there are at most 10% pornstars. The rest are mostly first timers who are college students. Very natural looking too. There is a minimum of fake tits and tattoos, although I wish I could say there were none.
-Inadequate search engine. For example, if you want blow job videos, you are led to the models who do them. Small problem though. Which one of the three or four videos for that model is the bj video?
-Tiny screen shot only, when you go to download a video. You almost never know what content you will get. Given the size of the site, this is a major con. I downloaded hundreds of videos and then deleted the ones I didn't want. Describe them upfront and don't waste my time.
Bottom Line: Sites that feature Asian models generally come in two basic categories. One is porn produced in Asia, where the girls often act as shy victims, especially in Japanese porn. The other common type features Asian models, but they are really overdone in California gonzo style. Too much makeup, fake tits, stripper clothes, overacting and just too fake, these videos are gonzo first and Asian not even second.

This site is quite different. The models here are mostly college age amateurs that you might meet yourself. They are light on the makeup, wear ordinary street clothes and generally are very natural. The few porn stars, around 10%, are not overdone either.

The girls here are from just about any country you can name in Asia, including even India and Mongolia. Many are Asian mixtures and others are racially mixed. The Asian/Black mixture models were truly striking and exotic looking.

Most videos are short clips that feature masturbation or showing off the model's body in a sexy way. Some use dildos, but many use only their fingers. A small number have the girls doing blow jobs, but most of the models don't. I didn't see any other b/g sex-no vaginal or anal. I saw only one lesbian scene. In the members forum, the site webmaster states that he finds it difficult to get true amateurs to do any hardcore.

The videos have a fun feel to them. The models are relaxed, mostly due to the cameraman telling them they are beautiful, how well they are doing, joking with them and using a few words from various Asian languages. This works, however the interviews are far too long and the non stop bantering during the scenes is a negative more than a positive. Yes, the models are relaxed and do well, but I got tired very quickly of listening to them talkng non stop. I recently got DIVX Author to edit out parts of scenes like these blabby ones.

The other negative is that the site could be much more user friendly. It is close to impossible to know what content is on the video until you download it. All you get is a tiny screenshot and no description of the action. The site is very time consuming to go through and save only what you want.

I liked the girls and much of the content. The two big negatives were the blabbiness of the videos and the difficulties with knowledgeable downloading. Recommended, but I cannot go higher than an 80 with these two major problems.

09-01-09  06:48am

Replies (8)
Visit Fucked And Bound

Fucked And Bound

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Discounted price through TBP.
-Underrepresented niche of male dom/female sub BDSM with sex.
-Nice size site with 100 videos and an equal number of screenshot photo sets.
-Nice ethnic mix of White models, as well as Latinas, Asians and Black women.
-Some are pornstars, some are BDSM lifestyle amateurs who don't make other videos and are exclusive to the site.
-Works with download managers. Fast downloads.
-No DRM or broken links. No download limits.
-All exclusive material.
-Active forum.
Cons: -Site may not be updating. No schedule listed, no mention of upcoming new material and updates do not include dates. Further, TBP has 139 videos in June and now there are only 100. Some archived videos I still have from my membership three years ago are no longer on the site.
-Can download only individual clips or all clips as a zipdownload file. If you do that, you also get 6 poor quality 320x240 jpeg screenshots- not even interesting shots. Since I also deleted the before and after interviews, I deleted at least 8 files for each download. Very tedious and you still have only clips, not a full video.
-Somewhat grainy videos at 640x480 1000 kbps. Not adequate.
Bottom Line: In the real world of BDSM as a lifestyle, the most common combination is male dom/female sub. In contrast, in the world of porn you more often see sites with females as dom and either males or other females as sub.

Many, if not most, BDSM sites do not include sex. Of those that do, they mostly portray females as doms. This site is one of only a few that try to strike a balance of hot sex with a male dom BDSM theme.

A strong competitor is the network of similar sites, kink.com. In particular, sexandsubmission.com is fairly similar.

The balance of sex and BDSM is different. SNS focuses on power transfer with a subtheme of sexual submission. What I mean here is that the women are portrayed as willing victims that enjoy being helpless as they are used for sex. The focus is to a large degree on oral sex being used, althogh there is also anal and vaginal. The props used are more creative than just using ropes. For example, they may be put in a box with their heads sticking out, or have their heads put through a hole in a wall. Generally, these women cannot move. Also, many scenes are outdoors or in any one of several locations.

In contrast, FNB focuses much more on the punishment aspects of BDSM. Anal is the most common sex here and it is primarily used to teach lessons to the girls for not obeying the Master. Although there is also vaginal and oral, these are not the most common focus. The girls are mostly, if not in all scenes, simply tied with ropes in a fixed position. While SNS portrays women as sex victims, FNB sees them as deserving of punishment for their "transgressions". There is no variety of locations and some videos have poor lighting.

The two sites have many similarities though. There is a lot of overlap, as both sites use many of the same male and female actors. Both sites stick to a theme of controlled consensual action. Both sites show before and after interviews to let you see that the females are not being forced or coerced. Both sites use safewords and conform to a self imposed code of conduct as to what is permissable. There is no overt demeaning verbal or physical degradation, no blood, no fisting, peeing, etc.

Overall the site is interesting if you like this kind of thing. However, if you are not sure, join sexandsubmission. Besides the quality of the content, the HD video quality at SNS makes this site seem to be in the Dark Ages.

08-20-09  08:03am

Replies (1)

Shown : 51-75 of 192 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.13 seconds.