Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Wittyguy (105)  

Feedback:   All (778)  |   Reviews (48)  |   Comments (89)  |   Replies (641)

Other:   Replies Received (390)  |   Trust Ratings (57)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 54 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Suze Classics

Suze Classics

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Good $10, 7 days full access trial
+ Also get full access to suze.net and suzevideo
+ Definite retro porn from the 80's and 90's
+ Pics remastered up to 1200x850 with zips
+ Good quality vids
+ Exlusive updates (er, "retrodates" perhaps) 3-4x a week
+ No DRM
Cons: - No video and pic set overlap (aka - no pic sets and vids of the same scene)
- No real HC photosets
- Site still smallish
- Prechecked cross-sale(s) on sign-up page
- Advertising on the pages but no too annoying
Bottom Line: If unshaved muff and names like Raqueal Darrian, Savannah, Christi Canyon and Teri Weigel bring back fond memories then this site might be worth donning your smoking jacket, trimming your 'stache and sitting back to go stroking with the oldies. This site features porn US stars from the 80's and 90's.

Here's the basic breakdown:

Pics: There are about 110 sets and all have zip. Three sizes going up 1200x850. All are basically digitally scanned photos from the original pic or negative and there is a smallish transparent watermark. Surprisingly there was very little graininess so the quality was good for what they were. The original lighting and cropping sometimes suffered though. The sets are somewhat small (most having less than 50 pics). I counted one true hc set but there were a few psuedo hc sets (no penetration) from the days when the skin mags couldn't show that stuff. This is defintely glam porn so if amateurs are your thing you probably won't be too into this.

Vids: About 75 vids using WMV player only. 3 sizes to choose from (300k, 1 gig and 2 gig) and they're about 15 minutes long. The largest sized out at 720x540 and they streamed for me around 350 kbs. Almost all the scenes are HC and remastered from the original film or tape. Again the quality on the remasters was very good but the original lighting and directing sometimes left something to be desired. Still there was some hot action here.

I'm scoring this site on it's own at an 82 simply because it's still growing, the original quality was sometimes suspect and for some reason this site did less for me than I expected it would. As I noted, you also get full access to Suze.net and Suzevideo. When you consider the network as whole, I'd score it around an 89 or 90 because the other two sites save it (See my comment on the suze.net page entitled "Site Stats Update" for what the network currently contains).

They have also added a forum but it's still relatively new, not real informative and the only person from Suze who seems to contribute is Holly Randall (she seems to be running the show now). There is a model directory but it doesn't have much background info on the models themselves. There is also a search function for various sex acts and poses.

If you're into retro porn, the 7 day trial price makes it worth checking out. For me, it was more of reminder of how much better porn is today than it was years ago but there is still some decent stuff there.

01-22-09  06:20pm

Replies (1)
Visit Euro Pornstars

Euro Pornstars

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Good $10, 5 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Daily Updates (1 scene or set per day)
+ Pics go up 2300x3500 with multiple sizes and multiple zip formats
+ Full preview allowed before joining
+ HD movies (HD in quality but not size)
+ Good search function, easy navigation
Cons: - Nonoriginal content
- No more bonus sites
- Some pic sets get grainy in largest sizes
Bottom Line: This is a site that has loads of potential but can't quite get there in terms of the final score.

This is probably more of a pic site than a movie site which is fine by me. There are about 375 picture sets which have 140 to 200 pics ranging from 1000 to 3500 pix (you can zip in three different sizes). The size is great but some sets get grainy. About 20% are hardcore, 15% lesbian and the rest are solo. Pics also have a slideshow function.

The vids, about 80, have a few percent more hc scenes than the photos. They come in at 640x480 with a 4200 stream rate (my download speeds were generally good). The quality is very good. You can download clips or full scenes (full scenes come it around 500mb sizes) and they run about 20 to 30 minutes.

They offer daily updates, good search and a calendar look showing the updates of the day for each month if you like. Navigation is easy. They also offer a great preview where you can look at the vids available and every thumbnail in every photoset.

With so much great stuff why not a great score? The answer is the nonexclusive content. They rely heavily on Viv Thomas material so if you've been a member there you've seen a lot of this. I recognized almost all the hc sets from Viv and other sites like Twistys and Karupspc and Sexybabes. Most of the softcore looked familiar as well. Some of the pics didn't stand up to being enlarged so big and some colors got a bit fatigued as well in the process.

Given that this is a Newsensations spinoff I think the score could have been helped by tossing in a couple of NS sites as bonuses. The bonus sites mentioned by earlier reviews now seem to be gone.

If this site had some original content and/or some decent bonus material I'd be pushing the score to near 90 but the nonexclusive nature hurts in this case.

If you haven't been to Vivthomas or some of the more mainstream porn sites recently then I think this is good site to visit. For those who have I think it's a question if you want the bigger pics (Vivthomas doesn't put his pic resolution as high as they do here) or to update your collection. I don't see any reason to stay for longer than the trial given the lack of exclusive material unless you don't really have any of this material.

11-06-08  12:53pm

Replies (0)
Visit 18 Eighteen

18 Eighteen

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available
+ No DRM
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips
+ Updates 5 days a week
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP
Cons: - Navigation is a pain but tolerable
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel
- Some advertising on site to buy their products
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download
Bottom Line: 18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.

Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.

All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.

The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.

You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.

Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.

I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked.

I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.

I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though.

10-24-08  05:44pm

Replies (0)
Visit Twistys


Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day
Cons: - Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size
Bottom Line: I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.

There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.

I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.

The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.

Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon

07-25-08  05:07pm

Replies (9)
Visit NS All Access

NS All Access

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each)
- Exclusive content
- Good TBP discount price of $15 month
- Access to 14 sites and some bonus material
- No DRM
- Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps
Cons: - Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set
- Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps
- Navigation needs work
- Site gets repetitive
- Some sites have stopped updating
Bottom Line: I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack.

The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies.

For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network.

I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough.

The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models.

If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality.

06-05-08  05:14pm

Replies (0)
Visit Team Skeet

Team Skeet

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Over 1800 hundred scenes of mostly attractive younger gals getting their sexy on across a 20 site network.
+ No DRM or download limits.
+ Bills through Epoch, no prechecked cross sales.
+ Updates about 5 times a week.
+ Mostly exclusive content (LustHD and Rubateen sites are just 18xgirls / teenmegaworld content)
+ Good quality vids with good download speeds and multiple download options.
+ Newer vids have tag jumps where you can jump to a specific sex act while streaming. Video streaming works well and has several settings.
+ Navigation is basic but it works well.
Cons: - The listed TBP price of $9.87 doesn't apply, monthly price is about $18.
- Ads, ads, ads, ads. Ads everywhere.
- Not a picture site, max resolution is 1600x1000 and only goes back a few years.
- Production quality is just average and drops down to amateur on some sites.
- All vids pretty much labelled "HD" although the older content isn't.
- Some sites are dead or update sporadically. Most update 1 to 2 times a month.
- Nothing terribly unique or exciting about the content overall. A generic porn hub.
Bottom Line: You know you're getting old when I know the last time I visited a site now included in this network PU didn't exist and I was in the last days of a 56k connection. A bit of nostalgia got a hold of me and I decided to take a look again and was pretty much left feeling "meh".

This is a 20 site network with Innocenthigh and Xtrasmall being the two best sites. Perhaps by coincidence these two sites have most of the major porn stars on them too. The network feature mostly US porn stars and a mix of amateur or very short lived porn starlets and the main focus is on hardcore porn (really no anal for those so inclined). Here's the skinny:

PICS: Like I said, this isn't a pic network. Pics max at 1000x1600 but by mid 2013, drop to 1050x750. With sporadic updates, it doesn't take long before you've hit the low end on most sites. Lots of action from vids missing on pics and cropping leaves something to be desired. Several sites may only have a few dozen pics. Scenes that do have lots of pics mostly feature the preshoot tease pics. Not a lot to see here.

VIDS: All sorts of download options (WMV, MP4, HD and standard resolution) as well as different levels for in browser streaming. Download speeds were consistently good (about 3 MB/sec for me). The stream function worked well and I like the tag jump function. You get HD starts about late 2010, before that you have the old standard sized vids. Vids also have screencaps.

NAV: Navigation, although basic, works pretty well. No dead links, everything worked. Tags as usual can be a bit spotty but seem pretty consistent here. The best way to search is by site or by model. Only limited model info provided.

OVERALL: For whatever reason, I wasn't terribly impressed with the site overall. I don't use a DL manager and I was still able to look at and download everything I wanted in about 6 - 8 hours.

A very consistent theme is felt given that a lot of models appear on many of the sites. The POV sites, Teensdoporn and Shesnew sites all had an amateur level feel to them (low production value, spotty lighting and single cam, usually operated by the man). Even the more interesting sites had average production value and some questionable camera angles. There's nothing terrible about the site but, then again, nothing great either.

I see that Maggie just finished a review here giving the network a score of 90. That is definitely too high of score for what you get in comparison to other hardcore sites at that level. In my opinion it's decent network so that's what my score reflects.

04-28-15  09:16pm

Replies (7)
Visit Twistys Network

Twistys Network

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Thousands of pic sets and vids to tempt you.
+ Daily updates (hardcore only updates 1-2 times a week)
+ Good sized pics (2000x3000), usually 100+ pics per set and come with zips.
+ Good pricing deal at $10 a month through TBP
+ Generally attractive models and mostly known porn stars.
+ Updates are date stamped.
+ Mostly original content but what they do filters out to other sites pretty quickly.
+ Stream rates were good on all downloads with little variation between high and low traffic
+ No DRM and no d/l limits.
+ Multiple download options for pics and vids including mobile.
+ Variety of scene options (solo, lez, and hardcore).
Cons: - Navigation, search and layout are a mess.
- Prechecked cross sales on signup and ads when you log in and in the site itself.
- Upsell purchase required to see all of the Twistys content from old.
- HD vids only come in at 720p but still look good.
- Technical problems across the board, just like everyone else who has reviewed this site the last few years (explained below).
- Zips don't work on pic sets older than 2010.
- No vid and/or pic set icons for older scenes.
- Pretty generic in terms of overall scene interest and photography.
- Problem with model names, notably giving "new" names to established Euro girls.
Bottom Line: For years Twistys (now the Twistysnetwork) was the old reliable. If you wanted a bunch of porn for a reasonable price that's what you got. Nothing flashy or niche based, just good old fashioned naughty bits in a professional package. This used to a standby site for me but with the new network design, new owners and array of issues this one is getting shoved on the back burner. Here's the breakdown:

PICS: Good pic sizes and lots of variety but that's where it ends. For their hardcore, they have one primary photographer so you pretty much see the same type of sex set after set after set. Many of the hardcore sets are heavily cropped so if you like full body shots then this ain't your site. The solo shots are better but they are pretty generic in character. Some problems with photographer using auto focus with too narrow of a focus field (pics get slightly blurry just outside of the central focus dot - probably because the pics are just HD screen grabs from the video shoot and the photographer can't figure out how to change his settings).

VIDS: HD maxes out at 720p but it was good quality and no issue to me. You get in browser playback but it was incredibly choppy - I had to go to the download option and watch there. I lost the ability to hear sound after watching 6 - 8 vids and had to exit the site and re-enter to fix it (sound just fine when downloading though). I had no problems downloading vids like some other recent reviewers noted. Vids usualy 15 - 30 minutes (shorter on the solo, longer on the hardcore).

NAV: This is the part that chapped my ass. The site underwent a major overhaul and like most software upgrades, you often leave some functionality behind. Here it was A LOT of functionality. The site is all flash based but there is no in site flash navigation. If you open a set on page 5 and use your "back" button you go back to page 1 every time. You have to right click and open every scene in a new window or else lose your place. Since you can only move up to two pages at a time you need be careful on a site this sized.

Advanced search is pointless since it relies on tags and the tagging is inconsistent. Model directory seems complete but names on Euro girls are sometimes different.

You lose the ability to download zips before 2010. Also, around 2010 you lose the set / scene icons (all it says is "no pic available") and those that do exist aren't representative of the content or even the model.

You need to upgrade to see all the older / oldest content they have.

Most of these sites (7 in all) simply update across the board with most of the content. This isn't new but it is a pain since if you have to do a lot of digging if you want to see as much as possible (each scene says which site it was updated to but this isn't reliable or consistent).

Overall, this is a decent glam oriented site. However, it could easily be more and better but simply chooses not to be. They've obviously cut their budget and it shows. So, for $10 you can't really go wrong but don't expect to be wowed.

01-09-15  01:53pm

Replies (3)
Visit Cougars In Heat

Cougars In Heat

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: +++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up
Cons: --- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain.
Bottom Line: It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:

PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.

VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.

THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.

I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.

Now, how come I never meet these women in real life?

09-16-10  04:30pm

Replies (3)
Visit Teen Pink Videos

Teen Pink Videos

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Excellent $1, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ Lots of hot euro cuties (about 200 models and 1500 scenes split about evenly between pics and vids)
+ Daily updates
+ No DRM or DL limits
+ Pics OK at 1180x790 with some sets being larger sized and all have zips
+ Interesting function where you can change the size of the thumbnail in the photo galleries. A nice option instead of the usual tiny stuff.
+ Vids are of good quality
Cons: - Cross sales on signup page
- Navigation is a bit of a pain
- No model info and no search engine
- Mostly nonexclusive material
- Vids can be tracked via date of posting, pics cannot (a pain if you decide to go back in the future)
- The coding of the webpages is such that when you go to a page it has to load all at once, not gradually. If you have slower internet speeds it can take a while to load some pages leaving nothing but a blank screen for a while.
- Plain website design
- Problems with consistent pic sizes
Bottom Line: This is a site run by the people who own Twistys but it's not part of the network. Not much of the content here is on the Twistys network so that was a good start. Overall, I was pleasantly surprised for what you get for a buck.

Pics: About 750 photo sets, all with zip. The pics are of good quality with good lighting and cropping and focus even on the closeups. Fairly professional overall. The content is pretty evenly split between hardcore and lez/softcore. Smallish watermark is tolerable. Most girls have multiple sets which is good. Most sets come in with 120 to 200 pics. One problem with a number of sets was that, for example, the portrait shots were 1180 x 790 while all the landscapes were 900x600. Same scene, same shots, what's up with that?

Vids: About 750 vid sets, downloadable in mpeg or wmv or as a stream in full video mode or scenes. WMV files top out at 720x480 with decent download speeds. Again, a good even mix of h/c and softcore and lez. The quality is good and the scenes are well shot and mostly professional in quality. You can look at the screencaps from the scenes to see what you're getting. Not all vid scenes have accompanying pic sets but most do.

Like I mentioned navigation needs some work. The only way to really find what you want is through the model directory since there's no search engine. The video page is good and easy to get around. The pic sets only allow you to go forward and back one page at a time. For pic sets, you only get one thumbnail showing the set so you sometimes have to dig into it to find out what the set contains. With the vidcaps, you can usually figure what the vid contains.

A lot of this stuff is nonexclusive and has been around a while (e.g. - a young Eufrat and Anita Keys are featured here). So, even the "new" upates were most likely shot quite a while ago. However, there was still a lot I hadn't seen before or saw in a "lesser" version elsewhere so I was pretty happy with the selection. Some may be exclusive but the site advertises exclusive content which it certainly lacks.

If you're really into the younger euro porn thing and you don't have a hard drive full of the stuff you certainly can't go wrong with the trial price. I could have stayed longer than the trial but the 3 days let me get most of what I wanted. If you've been around the euro teeny block a few times then a lot of the content will be old hat and you'd be better off spending your money elsewhere.

06-18-09  03:21pm

Replies (3)
Visit Brazzers


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of movies and picture sets
- No DRM
- Multiple Updates Monday - Friday
- Numerous pornstars
- Multiple themed sites
- Search options and "Girl" catalog available
- User rating system for the sets
- Zip downloads available
Cons: - HQ photo sets not very high quality\
- Way too many pictures in sets (1000+ usually)
- Quality varies with older material pretty weak
- Navigation is not very good
- Too many models with bad implants
Bottom Line: I'm a bit old school and I happen to like picture sets over movies so I'm going to focus on the pictures here: also, I think enough has been said about the movie downloads.

Almost all sets have way too many pictures (1000 to 2000) with way too many repeat pics. The sets prior to 2007 are not worth looking at. While they advertise high quality photos they are basically slightly less than full screen and some sets have pics no bigger than screen caps. There are some random large format pictures inserted into some sets. The photo quality varies a lot from good to lousy (these guys need to buy a decent digital camera and learn how to focus the thing).

Having said this I give the site an 80 simply because of the volume of content and the fact that you can get a membership for around $20 at this time. If you are into high quality pictures and content then this probably isn't the site for you. Otherwise it is worth checking out but unless you are really into the "big breast, big butt" genre then it's probably not worth sticking around for more than a month or so.

02-26-08  05:52pm

Replies (2)
Visit Pure Mature

Pure Mature

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + About 215 scenes of exclusive milf / mature hardcore action featuring mostly attractive gals.
+ All scenes have vids and about 98% have pic sets with zips.
+ Multiple download options on vids and vid quality is good. All vids have at least one HD download option.
+ Good download speeds for me (about 3-4 MB/sec).
+ Decent price of $18 month through TBP.
+ Bills through Epoch.
+ The inbrowser video player works well.
+ Good production values across the board.
+ Model directory seems complete.
Cons: - Not really a picture site (see below).
- Downloaded files and vids poorly labelled (just numbers).
- Too much music in the earlier produced vids.
- No real search function or tags. No model information.
- Pretty much M/F hardcore, not much anal or 3 way and zero solo or lesbian if you're into that.
- A bit too "heartcore" for my tastes.
- Updates only once a week.
- As one sort of expects with the older actresses, there is a lot of silicone to look at.
Bottom Line: Wasn't really sure what I'd be getting here when I signed up other than a more mature line of starlets. Overall, it's pretty much a straight M/F hardcore site featuring pornstars in their late 20's to late 40's. The girls are mostly attractive pornstars (no BBW) and the production value is good to excellent across the board (no amateur feel to it). Here's the specs:

PICS: Like I said this isn't really a picture site. The pics dating from the beginning to late 2014 have portrait resolution of 1500x2700 but only have landscape resolution of 1500x840. What went wrong there? Others are a hodge podge of different sizes (a lot of 1000x1500 though). The most recent pics are all 1000x1500. The pics mostly look like HD screen grabs so there is some blurriness and cropping is questionable at times. A lot of scenes are shot in bright light or white backgrounds which causes some pixelation and washout. Most of my downloads were done in hopes that I could salvage some stuff that would look good on my monitor as opposed to looking forward to editing the sets later.

VIDS: Download speeds were good for me. With earlier vids you get options 1080 mpeg or wmv or 480. Starting in 2014 you also get 720 resolution options. This mostly a "heartcore" site which means lots of bright background lighting. The older vids show a bit of pixelation because of this but it improves over time. Also, through late 2013, the theme was "heartcore" (aka - porn for mimes) meaning that no one in the scene makes any real sex noises. Apparently the producers noticed that and thus incorporated random porn synthesizer music into various parts of the scenes to take it down another notch. The music goes away for the later vids (late 2013 onward) and the action gets more heated but there are no real story lines or conversation in the vids. The camera work is decent though and you do get some nonstandard views which is welcome.

NAV: As noted, it's pretty basic. You can only search according to model, date or ranking. If you are looking for something specific in a scene then you'll have wade through everything to find it because nothing is tagged.

MISC: There is a fair amount of POV style shooting here (run by remote or a cameraman, not the herky jerky hand held stuff done by the guy). The scene shifts in the vids can be a bit choppy at times too. Otherwise, the main theme is heartcore or heartcore with a slight edge. No real slapping or spitting here which is fine by me but it's almost too tame, especially if you've seen some of the actresses other work. As a comedian once said, "If the sex ain't dirty, you ain't doing it right."

If you're looking to add to your mature video collection it's worth taking a look at. Otherwise I'd say it's OK. If you're into pics then I'd say move along. Average is the site so average be my score.

06-25-15  05:14pm

Replies (0)
Visit 18 Stream

18 Stream

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: ++ $1, 1 day full access trial (bills thru Segpay)
++ Big pictures (up to 4300 pixels, but most sets are still in the 2500 pixel range) with zips
++ Exclusive content (for me anyways, other reviewers have said different but I don't know and haven't seen it elsewhere)
+ Good sized vids (720x540 on most, a few are bigger) and d/l options (wmv, mpeg and quicktime as well as flash streaming)
+ Movies have screen caps to see what you're getting
+ No DRM
+ No cross sales on signup
+ About 680 vids and 300 pic sets
Cons: -- Pretty amateur in terms of quality and performances
- Picture sets don't offer a lot
- Slowish download speeds (1 gig = 1 hour of download time on my highspeed connection)
- Search and navigation need work
- No scene downloads, all or nothing
- Cannot jump around within the scene while using the streaming video option
- Camera work could be better (too often the guy seems glued to one spot or has a few focus issues)
- Page often has to refresh when going back and forth from it.
- No model info, just the name
- A couple of video updates a week, pics don't update anymore
Bottom Line: I checked this one out on the el cheapo trial to see some exclusive Eastern Euro puntang. That's what I got but it didn't exactly leave me with that "Charlie Sheen drinking tiger blood with the goddesses winning" feeling. This site is focused on hardcore younger girl porn and that's what most of the scenes are. Here's the lowdown:

PICS: All pics have zips and they are pretty big. The problem is that there isn't much content. At most a couple of positions and because the photographer won't move it isn't uncommon to get no view of the old "in and out". When your getting almost 200 pics per set and only a handful are good, that ain't good. The newest stuff can be slow download (can you say a half hour for one zip set) because of the large files. Some pics were out of focus too. Lighting and quality varies a lot. If you're into pics, this place won't satisfy you.

VIDS: All the vids were good sized and I didn't have any sections that were garbled from the download like some other reviewers did. The quality, angles (again, sometimes you just see bodies rubbing with no visible action) and lighting varies a lot from scene to scene. While the girls are exclusive they are also pretty amateur and it shows in the performance, not much excitement from most of them. Yes, it beats gonzo screamers but this is pushing it towards the other extreme. You do get screen caps and you'll need them because the stream option can only run from beginning to end, no jumping. Download times, as mentioned, need some help.

NAV: No real navigation other than the pics and vids home pages. No tags, no search engine, no model info. It is more of an amateur site but it is getting a bit big to have non of this info and still be functional.

OTHER: They do have some social networking functionality within the site which I never bothered with. Overall, I wasn't all that impressed. The girls are mostly cute but many of them don't put much into their performances. All the scenes are in Russian so you don't know what they're saying when the vids start but I bet you can use your imagination to figure out where it's heading. The camera work needs help and kills most of the picture sets. The volume of content is what keeps it in the high 70's for my scoring system.

You also get access to Spunkybee and Rough18 but the same issues I had with this site follow to those as well.

I had no problem finding what I wanted with my 1 day membership even with the slow download speeds. Certainly not worth the full $35 a month. So, I guess it's a good diversion for a day but don't expect a ton of good stuff here. Be happy with what you can still get for a buck I guess.

04-25-11  07:22pm

Replies (0)
Visit Fresh Outta High School

Fresh Outta High School

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Cheap $5, 3 day full access trial with TBP
+ Generally hot looking 18 - 23 old starlets in HC action
+ Exclusive content
+ Videos are pretty hot and 30 minutes long on average and no DRM
+ Access to 24 original content sites (Reelpass) and 22 nonexclusive bonus sites
+ Good for those with a schoolgirl / uniform fetish
+ No watermarks
Cons: - It's a Newsensations product, 'nuff said
- Pics are small and lack a lot of the content found in the vids
- No email confirmation of signup or cancellation with the netbilling.com processor
- Updates only 1x per week
- Some advertising on site
- Reptitive in sets and theme
Bottom Line: I joined this site on a trial since I noticed it wasn't part of the Newsensations network and I was hoping that maybe they were upgrading their product since it wasn't part of that group ... and I was wrong.

Currently, there are 62 sets/scenes and all have pics and vids. Pretty much all feature US youngsters in school girl skirts and conservative tops getting bopped in various ways. The production value is mostly professional with decent lighting and plot settings. Most of the time the girl stays mostly clothed so if you're into uniform type sex you might like this.

A lot of the sets are the same and scenes don't vary much so it does get repetitive. There a lot of known pornstars but a few fresh faces as well. No real model directory or model background is offered.

Pictures: Each set has about 200 to 300 pics but most are them are just of the girl stripping. Sizes only come in at 1024x680 with a few random 1530x1020's tossed in just to prove that they're intentionlly skimping on pic size. All sets have zip with good labelling. Like I noted, a lot of action on the vids get left out of the pics and you usually end up with a few dozen HC pics. Basically, don't go here for the pics.

Videos: Vid size maxes out at 800x600 with full scenes eating up a few hundred megs of disc space. Download speeds were OK. WMV is the only real option here for the biggest size. The action tends to be pretty good overall. There are hundreds of vid caps for each set so you know what you'll be getting on your downloads.

As I noted you also get access to the reelpass network with is mostly a newsensations clone. You do get access to newsensations so joining here on the trial might be a cheap way to update from that network if you like their product. This network (reelpass) is not pic friendly so, again, go here for the vids. The bonus sites are just the usual suspects (teensforcash, herfistanal, etc) and pretty much stream only though you can download clips if you're desperate for second rate entertainment.

On it's own this site merits a 79. Kick it up a notch or two when rating the whole network. Bigger and more pics would be a welcomed bonus (one of the main reasons I don't go back to Newsensations any more) and bigger vids would also be a nice addition.

I did the trial and had no problem getting what I wanted from this site in a day. If you like school girls this site is OK but you might be more entertained with a site like Innocenthigh. If you have the uniform sex fetish going, this ain't bad but I'd stick with the trial.

02-04-09  04:19pm

Replies (1)
Visit Anette Dawn

Anette Dawn

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Attractive Euro girl
- Updates fairly regularly
- Good sized pics with zip option and videos (1280x720 on pics and vids are 720x400)
- Exlcusive content
- No DRM
- Access to Twisty's websites
- Website is good looking
Cons: - Pics and videos could be of higher quality
- Video download speed is only average
- All softcore, no lesbiansism or hardcore
Bottom Line: Annette is an attractive girl with a good looking site. As of July '08 she has 53 photo sets and 38 videos.

As I stated, the sight is good looking and there is a good search function. She has a nice personality and definitely a hot bod even with the breast implants. She has a few sets where she is mostly clothed. I should note that the pics only download in one size.

The big bonus is access to Twisty's and its array of content. As a stand alone site, it would be hard to justify $20 in my book but then again I'm not one who usually joins solo model sites (I joined on a TBP trial offer throuh another Twisty's site). Personally, I would like to see her get a little edgier in her sets as they seem to blur together after a while at least for me.

The site could be better if it went high def but I know that's probably not going to happen with a solo model site. If you find her attractive it's definitely worth it if you join through Twisty's but for me I probably would not join it on it's own.

07-16-08  02:46pm

Replies (1)
Visit Blue Fantasies

Blue Fantasies

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Lots of exclusive content (220+ models and most have multiple sets)
- Good sized pics with zip (1280 x 850)
- No DRM
- Excellent trial rate of $2.26 for 2 days through TBP
- Excellent search functions
Cons: - No picture download options, you only get one size
- Vids are only average and come in wmp and quicktime downloads at 640x480 with average download speeds
- Only 50 videos and most are short (under 8 minutes) and some have annoying music in them
- Pics only come in one size
Bottom Line: I joined this site as part of the TBP trial offer. I was generally impressed by the content at it appears to be almost all exclusive. It has a lot of porn stars and generally attractive women. You also get to link into Twisty's, Annette Dawn and the Twisty's clone sites as part of your bonus features.

The search function is very good. You can look up models, physical features, clothing, etc. for the sets. The site is pretty softcore, not much toys or lesbianism. The focus is mostly glamour shots.

I like the fact that Twisty's has added an exlusive glamour site. However, for my money the content is only above average. If you like pornstars or amateurs there are better sites with better content out there. The content isn't bad but it's a little too glamour for me. The lack of vids and general non high definition content also puts it back in the pack as well.

It's definitely worth the trial since you also get access to the Twisty's sites as well. I will note that I joined through epoch and I got an offer to stay a member for $9.99 per month.

07-16-08  02:26pm

Replies (0)
Visit New Sensations Network

New Sensations Network

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Access to 26 site network (no access to their parody porn site which they are best known for today)
+ Thousands of scenes available
+ Mostly exclusive content (some DDF and lesser known site scenes tossed in)
+ Decent price of $15 month through TBP
+ Almost no download failures
+ Network updates about 4 to 5x a week but only on a few sites
+ Lots of good looking, mostly American girls
+ Mostly good lighting and professional shooting
+ Videos have screen caps, all scenes have zip download option
+ Bills thru Epoch, no cross sales on signup and easy cancellation
Cons: - Lots of recycling of content between various sites and some recycling of older content. A lot of content can be found as updates on 2 - 3 different sites in the network.
- All but a couple of sites are dead or infrequently updated
- No real ability to search, no model directory, updates are rarely dated
- No HD vids, all are 640 x 480
- Download speeds vary from 800 KB/sec to about 50 KB/sec depending on time of day but was mostly around 100 to 200 KB/sec
- No stream options in screen but you can watch a stream via a media player but it's almost impossible to jump ahead or back except at lowest band width.
- Pics only come in at 1020 x 680 but there are zips
- Too much use of fish eye lenses, especially on pov shoots (vertigo here we come).
- Very repetitive in terms of scene layout
- Network feels lost, not really a pic or video network, just a compilation of stuff that hasn't changed in years.
Bottom Line: There was PU poll question this week asking about the first porn site you ever joined. While this wasn't the first for me, it was certainly a staple for me back in the late 90's and early 00's when 800x600 pics and postage stamp sized vids were standard issue. Unfortunately time has passed this site by and this is probably my last visit here. For uninitiated, this network is 90% hardcore with a few lez and solo shoots tossed in. Here's the overall skinny:

PICS: I primarily joined this time since I'm more of a pic guy. Although the pics going to back 2007 are 1020 by 680 I still get good resolution on my 24" monitor with them. The oldest content is 600x800 and is functionally useless. Most sets have 100 to 200 pics. The bad news is that they seem to be cutting back to only a few dozen so-so quality pics per scene in the last year. There is a fair amount of fish eye lens use on some sites which hurts after a while.

VIDS: Let's face facts, this is not a video site. Your only option is 640x480 .wmv downloads (or the same for ipad/psp). The psuedo stream function is marginal at best. Some of the vids even look sort of bad this level of resolution but everything going back to 2008 looks decent. Downloading is a chore given the slow speeds present for most of the day (it's currently taking me over an hour to DL two 450mb vids).

NAV: Navigation on the network was apparently developed during the internet stone age. Each site comes up in a new window. No search engine period. You can only look up models for each individual site. I frequently found myself digging through my download file to see if I had nabbed the same scene off of a different site on the network because of the recycling of content within the network. A number of sites stopped listing dates on updates to make it seem like they're not dead.

OVERALL: The only sites that continue to update regularly are Freshoutofhighschool, Newsensations, UnlimitedMILFs and Jizzbomb. The main emphasis on them (except the milf site) is younger porn stars. There is a fair amount of uniform and other outfit shoots which I like as a nice change of pace from the usual porn offerings today. The action is usually pretty good, the girls are pretty good looking and there is a lot of content provided you are willing to deal with what is now average at best quality. That's why I gave the network a score of 77.

However, this network just seems to be treading water until the owners can no longer make money offering what they have been doing for so long. I see no reason why a network that's been around for so long can't make the leap into the 21st century by offering HD vids (some of the nonexclusive DDF material can be had in HD on the DDF sites) and bigger pics (a few sets do offer 1500x1080 sizes here, apparently someone forgot to "dumb them down"). Like I noted above, this network just seems lost given the lack of high quality vids and the new found emphasis on limiting the number of pics per set. The lack of navigation and search adds to the sense that this place is just going through the motions in hopes of grinding out a buck or two. For those PU readers who hold on to a sense of nostalgia about the "good old days of porn", I offer up this network as an example that the good old days weren't always so good in comparison to what's out there today.

07-16-13  02:29pm

Replies (5)
Visit Gaping Angels

Gaping Angels

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: ++ Good $3, 3 day full access trial through TBP
++ 17 site network
++ Exclusive Evil Angel content though some of it may be on other sites
+ No cross sales on signup
+ Some 720 sized HD vids
+ Fast download rates (about 1.5 mb/sec on a single download, about half that for 2-3 channels of simultaneous downloading)
+ Lots of anal and fetish vids for those into that
+ No DRM
+ A good number of recognizable porn stars
+ 100's of scenes / dvds spread across the network in a variety of niches
+ Several updates per week
Cons: -- Crappy search function and no cross site search
-- Photosets are worthless and no zip function
- HD streaming vids are pretty choppy even on my broadband connection
- A lot of sites have some overlapping content
- Video quality varies from great to crap
- Many scenes and DVDs lack model info and scene tags
- My computer crashed a few times during downloads (not if this is the site but this rarely happens to me)
- Limited number of HD movies on each site, older vids are pretty low in quality
- If you're from Canada, read the terms and conditions before signing up, it's sort of messed up for the up north folks.
- Some of the featured directors sites have actors and/or directors yammering on during the scenes.
Bottom Line: Other than the prospect of a cheap full access trial I don't know why I really signed up this site and I guess it shows in my score. For the uninitiated, this site is part of a 17 Evil Angel site network. Evil Angel tends to lean to the harder side of hardcore so don't expect much gentle solo softcore/midcore and story line material in the hardcore. Here's the bottom line:

PICS: In the network, most sites have only a handful of pics for their scenes. Most pics are just pose shots before the action. No zips. Good sized but only 30 to 40 pics per set. Quality and cropping varies. Skip this place if you want pics.

VIDS: All the sites have some 720p vids that download as MP4 files. All offer a high and low bitrate wmv download as an option. Most come in at 640x480 for the "high" quality content (non HD). All scenes have low and high level streams and the HD ones also offer HD stream but that was choppy even on my high speed connection. Fast download speeds but streaming took about 5 seconds to buffer on the "high" setting for me each time I jumped within a scene. Most quality is average while the majority of scenes are professionally shot with good lighting.

NAV: Navigation needs work. No model directory and no cross site search. Many sites have scene tags but many don't and not all are correct. No model info for many scenes so you're stuck if you want to find out who some hottie is. On each site you can search by movie title but the listings don't include all the movies on the site. Basically, lots of hunting and clicking to find what you want.

Overall, I can't really recommend joining unless you're a bit Evil Angel fan (in which case you've probably seen most of this stuff) or you're a collector looking to find specific porn stars. A lot of these sites have DVD series but even most of the series are just random or incomplete. This whole network feels a bit like an after thought, which it may well be in comparison to the official EvilAngel website (never joined that one so I don't know for sure). Videobox and similar sites offer a lot more content for the money once you get beyond the 3 day trial period.

Once you get beyond the known pornstars, the girls are fairly average looking and the production quality can vary quite a bit. I didn't find a lot that personally appealled to me and even with the crappy navigation / search, it only took me a few hours to scan over the offerings in the areas I was interested in. Average be this place so average be the score.

04-13-11  02:38pm

Replies (1)
Visit Brandi Love

Brandi Love

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + Good price (7 day full access trial for $10)
+ Decent amount of content (about 100 pic sets, 100 vids and 25 webcam shows)
+ Hot MILF with great legs and tight bootie who covers the whole range of porn
+ Weekly live webcam
+ All vids and cam shows have description of what happens
Cons: - Cross sales on signup page
- No zips on pic sets
- No update schedule and unsure how often it really does update
- Video quality average at best
- Navigation needs work
- Lots of advertising and cross promotions
Bottom Line: I usually avoid single model sites but decided to chance it here with Brandi and her banging hot bod. Brandi is an amateur MILF in late 30's early 40's who has a fitness body that most men wish their wife or GF had. She covers the whole gambit on her site, from HC to lez to fetish to swinger to toys to uniform to glam .... She does put a lot of time into her site but overall the site needs some work.

Pics: This is where the navigation sucks. She has a pic page with about 10 different categories. However, clicking on a category takes you into the same big archieve that you have to page through. Just one thumbnail to show what it's in the gallery so you have to look at each one to see what's really there. No page jumps, just forward and backward. No zips either. Pic sizes are all over the board from worthless and tiny screen caps to 2300x3500 in your face puntang depending on the set (you don't know until you click). Most of the pics are of good quality but I wish there was more for each set. You get at most 100 in a set and often only about half that. Some sets are continuations of earlier sets but that's not really clear until you get into them. Cropping is not one of her strong points either although part of that problem is that she uses a lot of stills from an HD camcorder for the photo gallery.

Videos: There about 100 now. You get four download choices (who the hell still downloads "Real" vids?). No scenes, just full vids. Problem is that most vids are 380x280 and of amateur quality. I wasn't expecting professional stuff as this is an amateur site but the quality still lacked for me. The webcams were OK but they are also fairly small sized. Brandi, boost your vid sizes and get a tripod if the operator can't hold the cam still! You get about 30 HC vids and the rest are solo, lez and in a few other categories.

The webcam archieve is pretty good and with about a dozen HC cam shows out of 25 total shows. Each show runs about a half hour.

She does do a good job of promoting herself. She has a blog but it's loaded with cross sale stuff and isn't deeply personal, mostly chat about her swinger lifestyle. She is big on the swinging lifestyle and has a lot of links for those who are into that.

There is some teaser "friends" stuff from other amateur sites but you don't get anything but a few very shot vids and small pic sets so I just call that advertising.

Brandi does enjoy what she's doing and that does come through in the pics and vids. So, I give her an "A" for effort. The execution could be better by enlarging the picture sets, fixing some of the dead links, improving video size and quality and getting some zips done on the pics. It's not a bad site but there's nothing that will keep me here beyond the trial period.

05-06-09  06:43pm

Replies (0)
Visit Reality Pass HD

Reality Pass HD

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + 5 site network (4 HC, 1 Lez)
+ Good TBP $5, 3 day full access trial
+ Some exclusive content which updates once a week
+ Some HD vids
+ A slew of nonexclusive material (1000's of pic sets and vids covering softcore, HC, lez, IR, etc.)
Cons: - Painfully slow download speeds
- Navigation and search is poor especially when dealing with nonexclusive material
- Exclusive material quality is only average
- Incomplete model directory and scene tags
Bottom Line: I find this strange to say but the nonexclusive content is what makes this site, not their original stuff and that ain't saying much. Here's the breakdown:

ORIGINAL CONTENT: 5 sites all link together. Pics come in at 800x1200 and all have zips - pics appear to be HD screen caps and aren't as complete as the vids. Vids come in streaming, 820x480 and 1280x720 HD and include clips and full scenes. The download speeds suck, around 150 kb/sec. The 820 and 1280 sized vids (roughly 700 mb and 1 gig in size) are almost impossible to download due to the length of time it takes. The quality is only average. You get iffy lighting and production but and the girls are teens/20's but only average looking. There is only one update each week between the five sites. Most only have about 12 sets so far.

NONEXCLUSIVE MATERIAL: This was the best part of the site. There are literally 1000's of photos sets and vids from about 15 to 20 production houses. You also get access to 380 DVDS but those are pretty old titles. Three big problems here. First, navigation is a pain. You can only jump 5 pages at most - not cool when dealing with this volume. Second, search is limited. You can search by about 20 categories. Then you can search by tags within categories. Tags and categories and model directory are all incomplete and sometimes mixed up (you get teens in the MILF section, some HC sets don't appear in the HC category, etc.) Also, porn stars who have multiple names require multiple searches - no cross referencing. Third, you don' know what you're getting unto you dig into it. Pic sizes range from 600 to 2500, you can only find out by clicking on pics to see what you can get before you try to zip or view further. Vids are similar, you don't know if it's partial scenes or full scenes and the quality and sizes are all over the board (no HD nonexclusive vids though). Couple this "hunt and peck" search method with the slow speeds and it's a royal pain in the ass.

As a plus, you get a lot of major production stuff (at times it looked like a Twistys or PaulMarkham or LegSex clone site) and you get Devils Film shots and other good stuff. So there is good stuff there but you have to spend a lot of time looking for it although you can search by production house if you want.

If they shelled out some coin for some servers and bandwidth and improved their search and navigation this site could easily score in the 80's. As it exists now, I can't really recommend it. If you do join you get the option of a $10 per month for life discount when you cancel but there's nothing here you can't really see within the trial period unless you plan on downloading a lot ... in which case it may take your lifetime to get it all ;)

01-02-09  01:53pm

Replies (0)
Visit Tasty Pass

Tasty Pass

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Great TBP full trial prices ($1 for 2 days, $12.50 for a month)
- 8 network sites focusing on eastern euro girls plus some standard 3rd party feeds
- Large photos (up to 1400 x 920)
- Videos are generally of good quality but only average sized (450 x 335 at the highest end)
- No DRM
- Content pretty much exclusive but I did find a couple of sets that I had seen elsewhere
Cons: - Content is mostly average and only about 4 of the network sites are worth looking at
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No zips for photos
- Some advertising on some of the sites
- I had some issues with the billing company here but they were resolved
- Photo updates don't come very often and the sites update vids a few times per month
Bottom Line: Overall, this isn't a bad network. I joined on the cheapo $1 for 2 days trial (you have to join an individual site, not the network to get this deal). I will note that going this route will result in a $40 monthly membership charge if you don't cancel (obviously this is where they're looking to make money). You also need to login under the heading "full membership", not "trial membership" on the login page. Why? I have no clue but this is how it worked.

When I went to cancel through the processing company (crmedialtd.com) they did not recognize my member info. I used the on-line chat function and got cancelled but my member info never appeared on the billing processor's site so this might be a red flag. Also, be aware that if you sign up for the trial, there are other "prechecked" trials on the bottom of the signup page; a nasty practice in my book.

Overall, the content wasn't bad. I found that I liked tasty18and19, bridesonblacks, and tastydildos the best. There are some solo model sites as well but exoticsforme pretty much covered them in his review so I won't delve into them here. Teensonblacks and the mature site were worthless. You also get access to 9 3rd party vido feed sites which are nonexclusive obviously.

Tasty18and19.com was pretty good with 77 photo sets and 82 movie sets with about 1/3 being hardcore. All photos were large, had small watermarks and were generally good quality. The girls were all pretty good looking. You also get access on this site to 420 streaming full lenght dvd's (nonexclusive) and 36 amateur girl vids (only downloadable in 2 minute clips). This site has the most content and most frequent updates of the network.

Bridesonblacks has no relationship to wedding day hookups. It's just an interracial site. They had about 30 photo sets and 60 vids. The newest photos were 1400x930 but about 2/3 were 1020x700. The girls ranged from young to mature. The photosets seemed to have stopped updating and the vids rarely update. I will note that all the vids can now be downloaded as full scenes. This site definitely had more of an amateur feel in terms of quality of the material.

Overall the quality was decent but certainly not high definition. Almost all the material is exclusive and the women are generally pretty good looking. I pretty much saw all I needed to on the 2 day trial but if you like the content the no zips will slow you down so the monthly $12.50 membership might be the way to go. Either way you go there isn't a lot of updating so there is no need to stay longer.

I'm scoring this a 77 because while the quality is decent there is not a ton of it and the updates don't come all that often on most sites. The billing processor problem/"gotcha" also counted against them here. It's a decent network but not the cream of the crop.

09-19-08  05:56pm

Replies (4)
Visit Paul Markham Teens

Paul Markham Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large number of models
- Easy Navigation
- User interaction (ratings and feedback)
- Directory of almost all models
- Preview options for vids
- Numerous vid download options including podcast
- Small Medium & Large pics with zip available
- Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions
- For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong
Cons: - Nonexlusive content that has been around for years
- When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory
- Repetive content
- Content rotates
- Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen
Bottom Line: I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets.

For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site.

I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory.

I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive.

If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial.

I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month.

03-21-08  10:12pm

Replies (4)
Visit The Hardcore Network

The Hardcore Network

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Decent 2 day, $5 full access trial through TBP
+ Mostly exclusive material (more than 50% I'd say)
+ No DRM
+ 5 sites have HD video
+ 13 sites to choose from
+ Network wide search function for girls, acts, etc.
Cons: - Primarily a video site, although they advertise pics they generally aren't that good
- Quality varies from excellent to total crap
- Prechecked membership boxes on signup form
- Some of the usual 3rd party bonus sites but can't view the content (lure to sign you up only)
- Pics have no zips and all pics for the set appear on one page and individual pics come up in separate window
- Sporadic updates
Bottom Line: This is a network that doesn't quite know where it's going. It has some more mainstream sites but then throws in some more extreme sites. The network advertises pictures but for the most part the quality is average at best while sizes go from 1600x1200 to useless small screencaps. The vids are the most consistent in quality and quantity with the standard being 640x480 wmv with decent download speeds and some HD sites tossed in.

The following are the sites I'd score in the 70's:

Iloveyouceleste; Iloveyoumya; Iloveyoumelanie; Iloveyoumadison. All sites have about 32 vids and 22 pic sets (1000x720). The vids go HD here (up to 1440x1080). All the girls are relatively attractive and they do solo, HC, toys and lesbo. The girls often appear in each other's sites so there is a lot of overlap. Each also has a pointless and brainless diary.

Attackmyass. Has pics, 35 sets, up to 1500x1000 but most are 1000x750). Vids, about 80, are average. Mostly outside content with known pornstars.

Pleasebegentle. Younger pornstar sex with 66 vids and only a couple of photosets. Vids are average but good quality.

Chopsticksluts. Nonoriginal asian porn with average quality at best.

The following, in my opinion, fall at or below the "Mendoza Line" score of 70:

Pornstarsolos: 77 average sized vids and 60 pic sets (most 800x1200). Nothing original here and some photo sets are just partials.

Asssmoothie: This I don't quite get. You see girl, girl strips, girl fires up the blender, girl lays on floor and dumps goo in her booty, girl pushes goo out the tail pipe and then it goes down the hatch. Breakfast of champions, mmmm. This is the same setup for virtually every set; all 150 vids and 52 pic sets. They have HD vids here which is a waste because if you've seen one you've seen 'em all.

Swirliegirls: High school nerd abuse? Not really, just another site I don't get. Every scene (25 pic and 25 vid which are OK) has a girl in a toilet doing some violent bj stuff and then getting her head flushed. Tries to be brutal but most of it isn't. Again, everything is the same in every scene.

Herlastfuck: This is like a slow motion car wreck, you know it's going to hurt but you just have to peek. The vids are average at best and the pics are worthless. It's all seriously ancient eastern euro women looking for some rubles after the Soviet Union collapsed and their pensions disappeared. I couldn't bring myself to wach the 86 yr old woman give a bj. Fat and nasty is the theme here.

There are a few more sites here which, again, have varying quality and pretty standard content and rate high 60's or low 70's but they don't merit any real discussion. With such a range of quality, only OK photos, and sporadic updates I couldn't score this site in the 80's. Given that so much is average, average be the score.

I did the 2 day trial and that was more than enough to take what I wanted and get out. Don't bother with the month here

11-05-08  05:00pm

Replies (3)
Visit Thai Chix

Thai Chix

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 100's of vids and 100k photos
+ Many photos come in at 1500x1200 and all files have zip
+ No DRM
+ Good customer service
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Updates daily
+ No watermarks (99% of the time)
Cons: - Nonexclusive content
- Mostly American asians, no Urabon and few "asian" women
- Most vids come in clips
- Many HC photo sets are incomplete
- Quality varies
- Navigation on a site this big needs work
Bottom Line: Overall, I would have to say there is nothing special about this site. As the content is nonexclusive the quality of the photos and vids can vary. Like I noted, it's mostly American porn here although it gets more amateur and asian in the solo girl sections. Here's how it breaks down:

PHOTOS: 360 HC, 130 Lesbian and 1000 solo sets all of which have zips. About half the photos come in at 1500x1200 and most of the rest come in at full screen (1020). Some of the photos are from screen caps so they can be grainy or blurry but most are pretty good but certainly not high def. A lot of the HC sets are incomplete and out of order or feature bj's only so there wasn't a lot to pick from there. A lot of the sets seemed the same to me after a while.

VIDEOS: There are 3rd party links to full length dvd's and videos. Most of the vids are in their "in house" section. Here, the majority can only be download in clips. Most come sized in 320x240 for wmv and 640x480 for mpeg. It streamed for me at about 400 kps. The quality is mostly good but can vary. There are no screen caps.

Navigation is OK and there is some advertising on the site. They have a search function that is just OK (can't search by scene content or body type) and limited model information. Customer support is good and it bills through ccbill.

While the site updates daily most of the updates are softcore. You get one vid and one photo set a day it looks like. HC and lesbian sets/scenes update infrequently.

If you've had limited exposure to asian porn the site is decent. If you're a fan of asian porn there probably isn't much here you haven't seen before or would want to keep. I got everything I wanted within the 3 days so I couldn't see staying for month.

Overall, average site, average score. Book it Dan-o.

10-31-08  05:23pm

Replies (0)
Visit Cuties In Stockings

Cuties In Stockings

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + $8, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Mostly exclusive content
+ Mostly attractive shaved Eastern Eurpean hotties in stockings
+ 296 photo sets of about 100 pics each with no watermarks
Cons: - Update schedule irregular (3+ months since the last update at the time I joined)
- Photo quality a bit grainy
- No zips on photo sets
- No search function and no model info
- Only 46 vids of mediocre quality
- Some cross marketing for their other sites
Bottom Line: No way to sum this one up other than your standard eastern european goulash. The site caters to the 18-23 hotties who parade around in their stockings. The offerings are pretty softcore.

Pictures: This is basically a pic site. All pics come in at 1200 by 800 with "nyet" zips. I counted about 15 h/c sets, a couple of lez and the rest were solo with only about 30 playing with toys out of the 296. I was a little miffed because a lot of the pics appeared a bit grainy to me. Part of this is because I'm thinking these are old sets and some may be scanned. I recognized some of the sets (it's mostly exclusive from what I can tell) and they date back to maybe around the year 2000. A few sets were obviously nothing but screen caps. Still the quality was acceptable for the most part.

Videos: You'd have more fun eating undercooked borscht than watching these things. I only downloaded a few but they were grainy, come only in WMV format, and clocked in size-wise at 350x290. They also chew up a lot of space for the quality you get (100 to 500 mb per clip). Most are split scenes, not whole vids. You get about 20 h/c scenes. Most of these scenes do not have picture set equivalents.

The site has an amateurish feel to it. No search, no model info. Just 15 pages of photo sets and 4 pages of vids. There are about 65 models here so most have multiple sets to offer. Most of the girls were cute and I admit that I did download about 50 sets but what a pain given the lack of zips.

This site gets a 73 for iffy quality, irregular updates (we all like to be regular, don't we?), no model info or search function, no zips and lack of quantity and quality of video. What saves it from dipping below the Mendoza Line of 70 is the quanity of decent looking babes.

It costs you $8 for a 3 day trial. Don't worry, you'll be done in a day if you decide to go. Don't bother going back.

I will note that when you cancel (billing through ccbill) you get an offer to continue at $15 a month. If you join up you'll also get access to 10 other sites that the webmasters own. Assuming what they have to offer on those sites is like here, I obviously opted to save a few bucks. Somebody needs to call the Kremlin and tell that the USSR is kaput and they need to get with the times.

03-18-09  10:03pm

Replies (0)
Visit All Inclusive Pass

All Inclusive Pass

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Reasonable Trial Price
- 10 Site Access
- Generally Good Photo Quality
- No DRM
- OK video with various download features
- Exclusive content
Cons: - Limited Updates
- No zip on photos
- Slowish download speeds on videos
- Navigation could use improving
Bottom Line: The name of this site should be changed from "Allinclusivepass" to "Allwegotpass". I had been a member several years ago and after a computer crash I decided to come back to replace what I lost. Basically, the content was unchanged. Only about half the sites seemed to have any real updates in the last year and only 2 or 3 of the sites seemed to have any real regular updates. Most of the sites have around 20 sets to choose from, some more and some less.

There are some interesting niches with the "Sleepassault", "Motherdaughterfuck" and "Usemydaughter" sites but, again, the lack of quantity and updates hurts.

The photos come in at full screen or larger and are OK in quality. The vids are generally just OK.

I don't have much to say that Roseman didn't include in his review. So the bottom line is this: The material you get is fine for a trial membership but there isn't enough quantity, quality or updates to stick around for any length of time. Join once and you probably don't need to go back.

04-16-08  01:34pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 26-50 of 54 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 3.75 seconds.