Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art (0)

Active
83
Wittyguy (95) 04-08-08  09:56pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (57), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Excellent photography
- Mostly attractive girls from all over the world
- Good customer service
- No DRM
- Multiple photo download options
- Good customer support
Cons: - Video quality is average
- Most of the models are not very "livley"
- Wish there were more models to choose from
Bottom Line: As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice.

As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times.

I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative.

All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (4)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

Denner (233) Fine review....
I sure agree with your cons about videos.
But if you're "in it for the photos" don't hesitate to try Met Art - it's great.

04-09-08  08:01am

Reply To Message

2

JBDICK (20) Hi Wittyguy

Thanks for the review. I agree with you.

The interesting thing that I saw in your review which struck me to reply is that you targeted Peter. Well done because I think you are absolutely right.

I think he believes that because he is a perfectionist and one of the best glamour photographers around, he's the photographer's photographer, and seems to be more concerned about the scene, the lighting and the ambiance of the shot.

The girl becomes a prop in the potrait of femine beauty, and therein lies the paradox. To achieve a perfect shot, any physical and emotional flaws of the model have been masked by a vacant veneer...

I hope he reads this review. Maybe he should get Paul Markham, paulmarkhamteens to give him some tips. Paul gives you a shot that begs you to climb inside the photo aka my local Lapdancing club...whereas Peter gives you a shot that makes you stand back and appreciate the female form, aka my local museum...

04-09-08  11:13am

Reply To Message

3

Wittyguy (95) REPLY TO #2 - JBDICK :

Thanks for the feedback; that's one of the reasons I like this site. I'm not going to comment on the PaulMarkhamteens comparison as I'm currently in the doghouse with Paul Markham over a review I recently gave his site.

Overall, and I've seen this on other sites as well, I'd have to say that if you're going to focus on shooting younger models you need to work on bringing them out of their shell because they just don't have the experience to put on an entertaining show. I think that webmasters would find that if they have girls that are into "it" then their websites would also generate more $$ too.

04-14-08  12:11pm

Reply To Message

4

hondaman (7) Good review. I was a member of Hegre-Art about a year ago I belive and though it was good I felt that some of his pics just seemed to lack "fire" compared to MET-ARTs(though many try to say that MET-ARTs models lack "fire")And Peter seems to prefer the very skinny models which is not really my bag. That is why I said at the end of my MET-ART review that is is best to try out several errotic sites to see what one you like best.
11-14-08  12:09pm

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.