Ratings & Reviews
|
All the reviews and ratings from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
26
|
Euro Pornstars
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Good $10, 5 day full access trial through TBP
+ No DRM
+ Daily Updates (1 scene or set per day)
+ Pics go up 2300x3500 with multiple sizes and multiple zip formats
+ Full preview allowed before joining
+ HD movies (HD in quality but not size)
+ Good search function, easy navigation |
| Cons: |
- Nonoriginal content
- No more bonus sites
- Some pic sets get grainy in largest sizes |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that has loads of potential but can't quite get there in terms of the final score.
This is probably more of a pic site than a movie site which is fine by me. There are about 375 picture sets which have 140 to 200 pics ranging from 1000 to 3500 pix (you can zip in three different sizes). The size is great but some sets get grainy. About 20% are hardcore, 15% lesbian and the rest are solo. Pics also have a slideshow function.
The vids, about 80, have a few percent more hc scenes than the photos. They come in at 640x480 with a 4200 stream rate (my download speeds were generally good). The quality is very good. You can download clips or full scenes (full scenes come it around 500mb sizes) and they run about 20 to 30 minutes.
They offer daily updates, good search and a calendar look showing the updates of the day for each month if you like. Navigation is easy. They also offer a great preview where you can look at the vids available and every thumbnail in every photoset.
With so much great stuff why not a great score? The answer is the nonexclusive content. They rely heavily on Viv Thomas material so if you've been a member there you've seen a lot of this. I recognized almost all the hc sets from Viv and other sites like Twistys and Karupspc and Sexybabes. Most of the softcore looked familiar as well. Some of the pics didn't stand up to being enlarged so big and some colors got a bit fatigued as well in the process.
Given that this is a Newsensations spinoff I think the score could have been helped by tossing in a couple of NS sites as bonuses. The bonus sites mentioned by earlier reviews now seem to be gone.
If this site had some original content and/or some decent bonus material I'd be pushing the score to near 90 but the nonexclusive nature hurts in this case.
If you haven't been to Vivthomas or some of the more mainstream porn sites recently then I think this is good site to visit. For those who have I think it's a question if you want the bigger pics (Vivthomas doesn't put his pic resolution as high as they do here) or to update your collection. I don't see any reason to stay for longer than the trial given the lack of exclusive material unless you don't really have any of this material. |
|
11-06-08 12:53pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
27
|
The Hardcore Network
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Decent 2 day, $5 full access trial through TBP
+ Mostly exclusive material (more than 50% I'd say)
+ No DRM
+ 5 sites have HD video
+ 13 sites to choose from
+ Network wide search function for girls, acts, etc. |
| Cons: |
- Primarily a video site, although they advertise pics they generally aren't that good
- Quality varies from excellent to total crap
- Prechecked membership boxes on signup form
- Some of the usual 3rd party bonus sites but can't view the content (lure to sign you up only)
- Pics have no zips and all pics for the set appear on one page and individual pics come up in separate window
- Sporadic updates |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a network that doesn't quite know where it's going. It has some more mainstream sites but then throws in some more extreme sites. The network advertises pictures but for the most part the quality is average at best while sizes go from 1600x1200 to useless small screencaps. The vids are the most consistent in quality and quantity with the standard being 640x480 wmv with decent download speeds and some HD sites tossed in.
The following are the sites I'd score in the 70's:
Iloveyouceleste; Iloveyoumya; Iloveyoumelanie; Iloveyoumadison. All sites have about 32 vids and 22 pic sets (1000x720). The vids go HD here (up to 1440x1080). All the girls are relatively attractive and they do solo, HC, toys and lesbo. The girls often appear in each other's sites so there is a lot of overlap. Each also has a pointless and brainless diary.
Attackmyass. Has pics, 35 sets, up to 1500x1000 but most are 1000x750). Vids, about 80, are average. Mostly outside content with known pornstars.
Pleasebegentle. Younger pornstar sex with 66 vids and only a couple of photosets. Vids are average but good quality.
Chopsticksluts. Nonoriginal asian porn with average quality at best.
The following, in my opinion, fall at or below the "Mendoza Line" score of 70:
Pornstarsolos: 77 average sized vids and 60 pic sets (most 800x1200). Nothing original here and some photo sets are just partials.
Asssmoothie: This I don't quite get. You see girl, girl strips, girl fires up the blender, girl lays on floor and dumps goo in her booty, girl pushes goo out the tail pipe and then it goes down the hatch. Breakfast of champions, mmmm. This is the same setup for virtually every set; all 150 vids and 52 pic sets. They have HD vids here which is a waste because if you've seen one you've seen 'em all.
Swirliegirls: High school nerd abuse? Not really, just another site I don't get. Every scene (25 pic and 25 vid which are OK) has a girl in a toilet doing some violent bj stuff and then getting her head flushed. Tries to be brutal but most of it isn't. Again, everything is the same in every scene.
Herlastfuck: This is like a slow motion car wreck, you know it's going to hurt but you just have to peek. The vids are average at best and the pics are worthless. It's all seriously ancient eastern euro women looking for some rubles after the Soviet Union collapsed and their pensions disappeared. I couldn't bring myself to wach the 86 yr old woman give a bj. Fat and nasty is the theme here.
There are a few more sites here which, again, have varying quality and pretty standard content and rate high 60's or low 70's but they don't merit any real discussion. With such a range of quality, only OK photos, and sporadic updates I couldn't score this site in the 80's. Given that so much is average, average be the score.
I did the 2 day trial and that was more than enough to take what I wanted and get out. Don't bother with the month here |
|
11-05-08 05:00pm
Replies (3)
|
Review
28
|
Thai Chix
(1)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ 100's of vids and 100k photos
+ Many photos come in at 1500x1200 and all files have zip
+ No DRM
+ Good customer service
+ 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Updates daily
+ No watermarks (99% of the time) |
| Cons: |
- Nonexclusive content
- Mostly American asians, no Urabon and few "asian" women
- Most vids come in clips
- Many HC photo sets are incomplete
- Quality varies
- Navigation on a site this big needs work |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I would have to say there is nothing special about this site. As the content is nonexclusive the quality of the photos and vids can vary. Like I noted, it's mostly American porn here although it gets more amateur and asian in the solo girl sections. Here's how it breaks down:
PHOTOS: 360 HC, 130 Lesbian and 1000 solo sets all of which have zips. About half the photos come in at 1500x1200 and most of the rest come in at full screen (1020). Some of the photos are from screen caps so they can be grainy or blurry but most are pretty good but certainly not high def. A lot of the HC sets are incomplete and out of order or feature bj's only so there wasn't a lot to pick from there. A lot of the sets seemed the same to me after a while.
VIDEOS: There are 3rd party links to full length dvd's and videos. Most of the vids are in their "in house" section. Here, the majority can only be download in clips. Most come sized in 320x240 for wmv and 640x480 for mpeg. It streamed for me at about 400 kps. The quality is mostly good but can vary. There are no screen caps.
Navigation is OK and there is some advertising on the site. They have a search function that is just OK (can't search by scene content or body type) and limited model information. Customer support is good and it bills through ccbill.
While the site updates daily most of the updates are softcore. You get one vid and one photo set a day it looks like. HC and lesbian sets/scenes update infrequently.
If you've had limited exposure to asian porn the site is decent. If you're a fan of asian porn there probably isn't much here you haven't seen before or would want to keep. I got everything I wanted within the 3 days so I couldn't see staying for month.
Overall, average site, average score. Book it Dan-o. |
|
10-31-08 05:23pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
29
|
18 Eighteen
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available
+ No DRM
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips
+ Updates 5 days a week
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP |
| Cons: |
- Navigation is a pain but tolerable
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel
- Some advertising on site to buy their products
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download |
| Bottom Line: |
18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.
Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.
All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.
The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.
You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.
Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.
I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked.
I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.
I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though. |
|
10-24-08 05:44pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
30
|
Tasty Pass
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Great TBP full trial prices ($1 for 2 days, $12.50 for a month)
- 8 network sites focusing on eastern euro girls plus some standard 3rd party feeds
- Large photos (up to 1400 x 920)
- Videos are generally of good quality but only average sized (450 x 335 at the highest end)
- No DRM
- Content pretty much exclusive but I did find a couple of sets that I had seen elsewhere |
| Cons: |
- Content is mostly average and only about 4 of the network sites are worth looking at
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No zips for photos
- Some advertising on some of the sites
- I had some issues with the billing company here but they were resolved
- Photo updates don't come very often and the sites update vids a few times per month |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, this isn't a bad network. I joined on the cheapo $1 for 2 days trial (you have to join an individual site, not the network to get this deal). I will note that going this route will result in a $40 monthly membership charge if you don't cancel (obviously this is where they're looking to make money). You also need to login under the heading "full membership", not "trial membership" on the login page. Why? I have no clue but this is how it worked.
When I went to cancel through the processing company (crmedialtd.com) they did not recognize my member info. I used the on-line chat function and got cancelled but my member info never appeared on the billing processor's site so this might be a red flag. Also, be aware that if you sign up for the trial, there are other "prechecked" trials on the bottom of the signup page; a nasty practice in my book.
Overall, the content wasn't bad. I found that I liked tasty18and19, bridesonblacks, and tastydildos the best. There are some solo model sites as well but exoticsforme pretty much covered them in his review so I won't delve into them here. Teensonblacks and the mature site were worthless. You also get access to 9 3rd party vido feed sites which are nonexclusive obviously.
Tasty18and19.com was pretty good with 77 photo sets and 82 movie sets with about 1/3 being hardcore. All photos were large, had small watermarks and were generally good quality. The girls were all pretty good looking. You also get access on this site to 420 streaming full lenght dvd's (nonexclusive) and 36 amateur girl vids (only downloadable in 2 minute clips). This site has the most content and most frequent updates of the network.
Bridesonblacks has no relationship to wedding day hookups. It's just an interracial site. They had about 30 photo sets and 60 vids. The newest photos were 1400x930 but about 2/3 were 1020x700. The girls ranged from young to mature. The photosets seemed to have stopped updating and the vids rarely update. I will note that all the vids can now be downloaded as full scenes. This site definitely had more of an amateur feel in terms of quality of the material.
Overall the quality was decent but certainly not high definition. Almost all the material is exclusive and the women are generally pretty good looking. I pretty much saw all I needed to on the 2 day trial but if you like the content the no zips will slow you down so the monthly $12.50 membership might be the way to go. Either way you go there isn't a lot of updating so there is no need to stay longer.
I'm scoring this a 77 because while the quality is decent there is not a ton of it and the updates don't come all that often on most sites. The billing processor problem/"gotcha" also counted against them here. It's a decent network but not the cream of the crop. |
|
09-19-08 05:56pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
31
|
Nakedby
(1)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
+ Excellent photography featuring natural French girls
+ About 55 models with over 300 photo sets (all exclusive content)
+ High rez photos go up to 3000 pixels with zip, most sets have 40 to 100 pics
+ Good 7 day full access trial of $10
+ Some model information provided and nice clean site design
+ Photo updates every 2 days (vids about 1x per week)
+ No DRM |
| Cons: |
- Not really a video site. About 63 vids which parallel the photo sets with most around 7-8 minutes. Quality is very good at 720x575 with WMV, DiVX and QT options
- Some photo sets are just continuations of a previous (same basic clothing and/or set)
- Pure glamour, no hc, lesbians or toys (if this is minus for anyone)
- Some sets a little too dark or fetishy but not bad in my book
- Zip feature only available in medium size |
| Bottom Line: |
Overall, I was generally pleased with this site. I like photos, especially for softcore, and this site has very good photography and huge pics which I would expect from a high quality glamour site. The girls are mostly French and I haven't seen many of them before. The girls are natural (no boob jobs or nasty tattoos) and for the most part seem to enjoy what they are going here. This is all about the girls showing off so don't expect any toys or lesbianism here.
Some of the sets do a get a little dark or fetishy as some other reviewers have noted but that seems to be the case with a lot of photographer oriented sites who seem to think this enhances their work but it didn't bother me too much since this is not the general rule here.
There are about 12 "mysterious girls" who have photo sets where you don't see their face. They are pretty much average looking and don't really add to the site. If you're feeling rich you can spend a few hundred $ and buy some prints (unless you wanted to show the world your a rich perv I don't know why anyone would if you can download the high rez pics). The site design is simple and clean and you have a model directory. The photos sets are laid out in a magazine style similar to Met Art, Hegre Art and similar sites.
For me, this site ranks between Hegre Art and Met Art. Nothing tops Met Art for the sheer content amount and quality. The girls here are not the super skinny types that Hegre Art has a lot of and they don't seem as cold to the camera either.
Overall, it's worth the 7 day, $10 trial. There's not really enough content where you need to stay longer. Hopefully the site keeps growing, especially on the video side. |
|
08-14-08 03:48pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
32
|
Taste The Babes
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- A good amount of photos with attractive russian girls (about 240 photo sets with about 25% being hardcore) (photo size is 1024 x 680) (about 70 to 120 pics per set)
- Good full access trial price. You get access to about 20 of their websites and dozens of standard 3rd party sites (see "bottom line" below for clarification on this)
- Access to over 240 sites with full monthly membership |
| Cons: |
- No zips on photos
- Only about 40 vids (only a couple of them hardcore) with no dowload options (mpeg only); size is only 320x240 (aka don't join this site for the video content)
- Nonexclusive content
- Some advertising on the site
- No search function
- Have to re-enter username/password for each site
- No new updates, material is simply recycled
- 3rd part bonus links (HerfirstATM, Desperateteens, etc.) do not work and all contain nonexclusive material you've probably seen before
- Monthly membership of $40 way too expensive for what you get (in addition to the 20 or so main sites you get additional nonexclusive 3rd party bonus sets, upwards of 250)
- No response to site support inquiries |
| Bottom Line: |
I posted a comment about this site a few months ago saying it was worth the trial (I was originally a member a few years ago). Having come back here on a trial all I can say now is "NYET"!
First, TBP is advertising a 3 day, $2 trial. When you go to the billing processor you find out the trial is 2 days for $4. You get access to some of their other sites but I kept random log in popups that kept freezing up my browser (not good).
This site has been around for years yet their oldest update dates to November '07. Bad sign. There was absolutely nothing new in hardcore since the last time I was there years ago. They just recycle their old content as "new updates". You get access to Tastethebabes which is a clone and most of the other exclusive sites are amateurish mature sites.
On the plus side, their stuff is nonexclusive but mostly shared among their sites and I have seen very little of it elsewhere. The girls are attractive russians so if you've not seen the stuff before and are willing to download each pic (no zips) then you might consider joining for the trial.
However, I can in no way justify joining this site for the monthly fee of $40. There are some sites exclusive to their network that have OK stuff but there's not enough quality and not enough quantity to justify the price. Even justifying the trial here is a stretch. Today's PU poll question asks if you've gotten sick of porn before. This site makes me have to answer "Yes". |
|
07-31-08 04:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
33
|
Twistys
(6)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- 10,000+ photo sets with about 1200 hardcore and all have zip function. Newest material is 1600x1070, most is 1280x850 and a few are 800x600.
- 2250 vids with about 1000 hardcore with good download speeds in QT and WMV, most come in 640x480 size
- No DRM
- Small watermarks
- Good trial / discount price through TBP (currently you can join at a 2 day trial for $2.26 through Blue Fantasies and other Twisty's sites)
- Access to about 6 sites with membership
- Very good search function
- Several updates every day |
| Cons: |
- Mostly non exclusive material
- Updates dont' keep up with other "mega" sites (see "bottom line" for discussion)
- Most of the other sites available are Twisty's clones with the exception of Blue Fantasies, Naughtystaff and Annette Dawn
- Pics only come in one size |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been a member at Twisty's in the past and I rejoined on a two day trial membership through Bluefantasies.
There is a ton of content here so if you're rather newish to the porn surfing world you're going to find a lot to like. The content is mostly centered around pornstars in professional style shoots with some amateurish stuff tossed in. However, if you've been around a while you'll recognize most of the sets. There's a lot of material from Vivthomas and pretty much the same material as the Sexy-babes / Dreambabes sites and a few other mega sites. It's been about a year since I was a member at a mega site and quite honestly I only found about 40 "new to me" hardcore sets -- this includes their bonus sites. A lot of their new updates is stuff that other sites seem to have had for a while now.
I will give them Kudos for having a very good search function and model directory. Also I liked the fact that they have upgraded a lot of their older photo sets from 800x600 (which they used to be) to roughly 1020 by 720 or larger now.
The bonus sights, as mentioned, are almost all clones.
Standing on it's own, I'm giving Twisty's a score of 81. If I included bonus sites I'd bump the score up a couple of points more. While the content is good it is nonexclusive and other mega sites do it better with more up to date content. If you're newish to the porn surfing scene then it is well worth checking out; just don't plan to go back anytime soon |
|
07-25-08 05:07pm
Replies (9)
|
Review
34
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Attractive Euro girl
- Updates fairly regularly
- Good sized pics with zip option and videos (1280x720 on pics and vids are 720x400)
- Exlcusive content
- No DRM
- Access to Twisty's websites
- Website is good looking |
| Cons: |
- Pics and videos could be of higher quality
- Video download speed is only average
- All softcore, no lesbiansism or hardcore |
| Bottom Line: |
Annette is an attractive girl with a good looking site. As of July '08 she has 53 photo sets and 38 videos.
As I stated, the sight is good looking and there is a good search function. She has a nice personality and definitely a hot bod even with the breast implants. She has a few sets where she is mostly clothed. I should note that the pics only download in one size.
The big bonus is access to Twisty's and its array of content. As a stand alone site, it would be hard to justify $20 in my book but then again I'm not one who usually joins solo model sites (I joined on a TBP trial offer throuh another Twisty's site). Personally, I would like to see her get a little edgier in her sets as they seem to blur together after a while at least for me.
The site could be better if it went high def but I know that's probably not going to happen with a solo model site. If you find her attractive it's definitely worth it if you join through Twisty's but for me I probably would not join it on it's own. |
|
07-16-08 02:46pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
35
|
Blue Fantasies
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of exclusive content (220+ models and most have multiple sets)
- Good sized pics with zip (1280 x 850)
- No DRM
- Excellent trial rate of $2.26 for 2 days through TBP
- Excellent search functions |
| Cons: |
- No picture download options, you only get one size
- Vids are only average and come in wmp and quicktime downloads at 640x480 with average download speeds
- Only 50 videos and most are short (under 8 minutes) and some have annoying music in them
- Pics only come in one size |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site as part of the TBP trial offer. I was generally impressed by the content at it appears to be almost all exclusive. It has a lot of porn stars and generally attractive women. You also get to link into Twisty's, Annette Dawn and the Twisty's clone sites as part of your bonus features.
The search function is very good. You can look up models, physical features, clothing, etc. for the sets. The site is pretty softcore, not much toys or lesbianism. The focus is mostly glamour shots.
I like the fact that Twisty's has added an exlusive glamour site. However, for my money the content is only above average. If you like pornstars or amateurs there are better sites with better content out there. The content isn't bad but it's a little too glamour for me. The lack of vids and general non high definition content also puts it back in the pack as well.
It's definitely worth the trial since you also get access to the Twisty's sites as well. I will note that I joined through epoch and I got an offer to stay a member for $9.99 per month. |
|
07-16-08 02:26pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
36
|
NS All Access
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Hundreds of attractive porn star models in about 2800 sets (pics and vids each)
- Exclusive content
- Good TBP discount price of $15 month
- Access to 14 sites and some bonus material
- No DRM
- Newer vids come in at a decent size (640 x 480) with a stream rate over 1 mps |
| Cons: |
- Small pics (600 x 800 and oldest sets getting even smaller) with limited positions and most having less than 80 pics per set
- Older vids come in at 320 x 240 with a stream rate around 500 - 600 bps
- Navigation needs work
- Site gets repetitive
- Some sites have stopped updating |
| Bottom Line: |
I used to join this site about once a year and returned a few months ago after about 16 month abscence. What I found was that in terms of quality the network lags behind the pack.
The newer vids (over a 1000 of them) come in at the larger size but only in wmv and real formats but then the quality drops. The older vids are way too small and only come in scenes, not full movies.
For hardcore lovers, Newsensations, MrBiggz, POVfantasy and Jizzbomb are by far the best sites of the bunch. There is some set overlap between the sites but not much. The bonus material didn't really add anything to the network.
I like pictures and the photos only come in at 800 x 600 which is a shame given todays standards. The poses get repetitive and the hardcore content is limited to only a few different positions which tend to be the same from set to set. At 60 - 80 photos per set (the old stuff has even less) there just isn't enough.
The navigation needs work given that it doesn't list all the models in all the sites and after the posts move off the recent updates pagethere is no indication of when a set was posted -- if you've been a member before this is a real pain given the hundreds of models.
If you've never joined then the TBP discount probably makes it worth your while given the volume of material available. For me, I think I'm probably done coming back unless they seriously upgrade their quality. |
|
06-05-08 05:14pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
37
|
Met Art
(8)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography with photos in sizes going up to approx. 4000 x 3000 pixels.
- Newer vids go up 1280 x 720 pixels with good download speeds (older vids are 512 x 330)
- 1000+ very attractive models, many with multiple sets
- Multiple daily updates
- No DRM |
| Cons: |
- No model info
- Vids aren't as good as the photo sets
- Site gets a little dull and repetitive
- No hardcore or toys or penetration, a few very mild lesbian scenes
- Photo quality can vary a little with some of the larger photos being somewhat grainy |
| Bottom Line: |
As a photo lover I would have to rank Metart as the best solo model / softcore photo sites out there. The photos get insanely large (4000+ pixels - practically life size if you got a monitor that big) and the photography is mostly excellent. With multiple daily updates and over half a million pics no one can complain about a lack of quantity or quality for the most part.
I would have to say that the vids lag behind the photos and that the vids mostly parallel the photo sets in terms of content. Like other PU reviewers have noted, they need to expend a little more effort to boost their video quality.
As with Hegreart, the focus here is mostly on european girls and for some reason they can sometimes come across as a little "cold" although this isn't a major problem. I did find the site a bit repetitive given that the content is very softcore.
Overall, I would join primarily for the pics at this point although the newer vids are quite good in their quality. If the site got a little "edgier" with some toys or lesbian sets I would jump my score to about a 95. As is, I got a little too bored with the vast amounts of material so, for me, a 91 seems appropriate. |
|
05-29-08 06:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
38
|
Hands on Hardcore
(2)
93.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Professional photography
- Over 500 hardcore scenes (all have pics and vids)
- High rez downloads for newer postings (up to 1800 pixels at a rate over 1 meg per second) and no DRM
- High rez pics (up to 2000 pixels but most at 1600) with zip available
- Only hardcore sex divided into 7 categories
- Model index and generally good navigation
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Some content recycled through other DDF sites
- Older content is only average quality (standard sized .wmv downloads available only in sections and pics only at 800 x 600)
- Pics come up in a separate window
- No bonus content
- Download speeds can vary |
| Bottom Line: |
I am a big fan of Deny DeFranco and his DDF sites (1ByDay, Hotlegsandfeet) but had never joined here mostly due to a high fee. I noticed that the site is now $30 month and tried it.
First, the site is what it says. No solo or lesbian sets, everything is m/f sex in 7 categories.
The professionalism is first rate. No out of focus pics or shakey videos. The models are almost all European.
The newer sets, about 1/3, have the high quality download options in several download formats (wmv, dvx). The oldest material, about 1/3 again, can only be dowloaded in sections and only display around 440 x 250. I noticed that download speeds varied depending on the time of day but speeds were generally good.
The pics are very good with most being at 1600 pixels with S, M, and L options available. Most sets have around 120 pics. The newest pics in their largest size also have the actual photographic data from the shoot stored in them if you're into that.
My only disappointment with the site was that a fair number of sets here also appear on other DDF sites. One of the recent updates (site updates about 2 - 3 times a week) was a set I've had for years. If you're already a frequent visitor to the other DDF sites you might want to consider if you want to join here.
This is a great site if you like nonreality based hardcore. The only thing that could really be better would be more frequent updates and more original content. Overall, well worth the money |
|
05-01-08 11:46pm
Replies (3)
|
Rating
39
|
Karup's PC
(2)
92.0
|
No Review.
|
04-25-08 02:49pm
|
Review
40
|
POV Network
(0)
64.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Access to 5 sites
- In expensive trial ($5)
- Some high quality vids and OK photos
- No DRM
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Sites are poorly designed
- Sites stopped updating as of 1/08 with few updates prior to that
- Most sets are lower quality vids and pics
- No zip and only one photo size
- Many dead links
- Not a lot of content
- Admitted history of problems with sites by the webmaster
- Newer pics have large watermarks that sometimes obscure "the stuff" |
| Bottom Line: |
This one was pretty much like a bad trip down memory lane. If you remember what porn sites looked like 10 years with broken links, one size fits all vids and photos and minimal web design then you have this site.
I took the trial primarily for povporn.com There were about 30 to 40 girls there. Of those, about 12 had better pics (1020 x 660) as well as good quality vids. The rest had 800 x 600 pics with low quality vids that have to be downloaded in segments. Two other sites only had about a dozen sets each. The main emphasis of the network is on Petersgirls which had the most content but was almost all softcore. By the time I got there, I was pretty much "done" with the whole thing and didn't look at much.
I got a good laugh at the Lapdancegonebad.com website. None of the photo links worked and there 8 videos. The main page had about 24 months of updates. There were no updates on any of the page. Instead there were some webmaster postings dating back to 2006 trying to calm customer complaints about bad links, slow updates, etc. His excuse then was bad support staff and people taking advantage of him. The next month, though, he was bragging about he was going to build a porn empire and turned down a $1 million offer for all his content. Apparently, he "relaunched" in the summer of 2007 but the same problems seem to have continued.
Basically, this network is a waste of time even for the trial offer. Let's just say I took one for the team here. |
|
04-21-08 06:47pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
41
|
Suze Video
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Expanded libary now (100s of videos each in several different categories)
- Lots of attractive models
- No DRM
- Good customer support
- Good unrestricted trial offer (when available)
- Professional camera work |
| Cons: |
- Download speeds a little slow
- Video quality is average at best
- Navigation could be better |
| Bottom Line: |
I recently did a review of suze.net (photos site only) and recently reupped for the combined suze.net and suzevideo.net. I'm limiting my review here to the videos.
I'm primarily into photos and didn't spend a lot of time with the videos. You have several download options in WMV format. I did note that the speeds were a little slow and you don't get hi res, just average video quality at best. For the most part, the women are attractive and the scenes are hot so that is the trade off.
Navigation is a but of a bummer for both sites. When you have years worth of material but can only jump 2 pages at time you think they would make paging easier.
In a nutshell, the videos arent' bad, the most recent videos are best. However, Suze and company started in the photography era and the photos are probably the best part of the site. Maybe this will change. I would probably stick to the trial offer when they advertise for one -- in my other review I noted that you have to hunt for their trials but they are out there. |
|
04-17-08 04:25pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
42
|
All Inclusive Pass
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Reasonable Trial Price
- 10 Site Access
- Generally Good Photo Quality
- No DRM
- OK video with various download features
- Exclusive content |
| Cons: |
- Limited Updates
- No zip on photos
- Slowish download speeds on videos
- Navigation could use improving |
| Bottom Line: |
The name of this site should be changed from "Allinclusivepass" to "Allwegotpass". I had been a member several years ago and after a computer crash I decided to come back to replace what I lost. Basically, the content was unchanged. Only about half the sites seemed to have any real updates in the last year and only 2 or 3 of the sites seemed to have any real regular updates. Most of the sites have around 20 sets to choose from, some more and some less.
There are some interesting niches with the "Sleepassault", "Motherdaughterfuck" and "Usemydaughter" sites but, again, the lack of quantity and updates hurts.
The photos come in at full screen or larger and are OK in quality. The vids are generally just OK.
I don't have much to say that Roseman didn't include in his review. So the bottom line is this: The material you get is fine for a trial membership but there isn't enough quantity, quality or updates to stick around for any length of time. Join once and you probably don't need to go back. |
|
04-16-08 01:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
43
|
Hegre Art
(2)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- Excellent photography
- Mostly attractive girls from all over the world
- Good customer service
- No DRM
- Multiple photo download options
- Good customer support |
| Cons: |
- Video quality is average
- Most of the models are not very "livley"
- Wish there were more models to choose from |
| Bottom Line: |
As the for the good, this is a very good "art" site with no hardcore, toys and very little lesbianism. the photography is first rate with photo download options ranging from 1200 to 6000 pixels (who but the truly obsessed is going to download and view a 6k picture). Right now there are about 160 different models with the majority having multiple sets. There is a little info about each model which is nice.
As for the so-so part of this review (which is why I scored at as I did), a lot of the models are east european and Peter seems to lake the ability to bring them out of their shell. Many models have an ambivalent look about their posing that may be euro kosher but lacks fizz by US standards. Some of the girls are sizzling hot while many are simply good looking teens. The sets also tend to get a bit repetitive at times.
I wish there were more models to choose from and that Peter would get a little more creative.
All in all, it's a pretty good site. However, for the money, I would probably consider joining Met-Art (never been a member) over Hegre-Art again. |
|
04-08-08 09:56pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
44
|
Suze Randall
(1)
91.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Suze is a legend
- Huge Photo Archieve
- Multiple Download Options
- Model Search & Index
- Good Customer Service
- Hot babes if glamor and/or fetish is your thing
- Sweet $4.77 full trial |
| Cons: |
- Some photo sets are limited (not showing full suite of photos)
- Some "pseudo porn" on the old sets
- You have to hunt for the trial offers
- Possibly some set rotation but does not appear to happen often
- No videos (based solely on the trial offer I signed up for) |
| Bottom Line: |
(Note: This is a review for Suze.net only, it does not cover suzevideo.net)
If you love huge quantities of quality photos of hot girls then this is the place for you. If you're not familiar with Suze think of Penthouse and Hustler as the standard I'm talking about.
I was at Suze.net a few months ago and just came back and what a difference. You now get 10 years of photos which means 500+ boy/girl sets, 300+ girl/girl sets, 1600+ centerfolds and hundreds of additional sets. The sets allow zip and download options of 800, 1024 and 1400 pixels. The sets prior to '03 generally lack the 1400 option. The sets generally had 50 - 100 pics each with older ones usually having less than 50.
A lot of this stuff I hadn't seen since the days when a 56k connection was high speed, Jill Kelly ruled and white guys with names like "Dale DaBoner" swung their stuff. Depsite the fact that many of the sets were older they didn't seem too dated given the glamor/fetish emphasis of the site.
My only dislikes were that the older sets had a lot of psuedo (aka nonpenetration porn) and that Suze keeps shifting her trial offers. I'm a cheap bastard and I eventually found a tgp link that got me into the $4.77 full trial as advertised by TBP. Otherwise, it's hit or miss on the posted trial amounts if you go to the site. Also, a few sets I had seen before lacked all the images available.
With a full trial of less than $10 you simply can't go wrong. Basically, this site rocks. |
|
03-31-08 02:27pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
45
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Large number of models
- Easy Navigation
- User interaction (ratings and feedback)
- Directory of almost all models
- Preview options for vids
- Numerous vid download options including podcast
- Small Medium & Large pics with zip available
- Young attractive models (18-22) with no exceptions
- For a $2.95 trial you can't really go wrong |
| Cons: |
- Nonexlusive content that has been around for years
- When searching I came across some models that were not listed in the model directory
- Repetive content
- Content rotates
- Pics not in high rez although they do go larger than full screen |
| Bottom Line: |
I've looked at this site for a while and finally did the $2.95 trial. If you have been downloading porn for any length of time you'll quickly notice that this stuff has been around for years. None of the content, from what I could tell, is exclusive. For me it was a trip down memory lane and an opportunity to download a few things that were wiped out years ago. There are 100 boy/girl sets with about 1/3 of those being videos; about 150 lesbian sets and hundreds of solo model sets.
For newbies who don't mind 90's looking and dressed euro models, I reccommend the site. For those who have been around a while I would join only if you haven't seen this stuff before. Generally, I only found a few vids and picture sets that I haven't seen before but I'm sure would be on another site like Karupspc or similar site.
I did like the multiple picture sizes (large typically goes slightly bigger than full screen), zip features, and model directory. I did come across some models when using the search function that weren't in the directory.
I have noticed when looking at the site previously that there is content rotation. Also, the format is pretty much the same for the models and it can get repetitive.
If there was exclusive content or more boy/girls sets I would score this site in the mid 80's. As it is now, it's worth the trial.
I will note that when you cancel you have an option to continue for $19.95 per month. |
|
03-21-08 10:12pm
Replies (4)
|
Review
46
|
Brazzers
(6)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Lots of movies and picture sets
- No DRM
- Multiple Updates Monday - Friday
- Numerous pornstars
- Multiple themed sites
- Search options and "Girl" catalog available
- User rating system for the sets
- Zip downloads available |
| Cons: |
- HQ photo sets not very high quality\
- Way too many pictures in sets (1000+ usually)
- Quality varies with older material pretty weak
- Navigation is not very good
- Too many models with bad implants |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm a bit old school and I happen to like picture sets over movies so I'm going to focus on the pictures here: also, I think enough has been said about the movie downloads.
Almost all sets have way too many pictures (1000 to 2000) with way too many repeat pics. The sets prior to 2007 are not worth looking at. While they advertise high quality photos they are basically slightly less than full screen and some sets have pics no bigger than screen caps. There are some random large format pictures inserted into some sets. The photo quality varies a lot from good to lousy (these guys need to buy a decent digital camera and learn how to focus the thing).
Having said this I give the site an 80 simply because of the volume of content and the fact that you can get a membership for around $20 at this time. If you are into high quality pictures and content then this probably isn't the site for you. Otherwise it is worth checking out but unless you are really into the "big breast, big butt" genre then it's probably not worth sticking around for more than a month or so. |
|
02-26-08 05:52pm
Replies (2)
|
Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories
- Forum
Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters
 |
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
|
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.
Loaded in 0.9 seconds.
|
|
