Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : creampiefan (6)  

Feedback:   All (14)  |   Reviews (4)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (10)

Other:   Replies Received (1)  |   Trust Ratings (10)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit Ultimate Fantasy Girls

Ultimate Fantasy Girls
(0)

70.0
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: Lots of content; solos, girl-girl, boy-girl; they seem to really focus on BJ's in the boy-girl shoots.
Hi-Res Photos w/Zip download.
Hi-Res Vids.
Unlimited downloads, no DRM on Vids
Fairly frequent updates.
Cons: Not all exclusive content.
Photography is mediocre in some cases, particularly true on the FanasyGirlCarmella site pages. I say mediocre because their photogs and/or direcors just can't get poses done correctly to get focus in some shots, so you end up with half the model in focus and half fuzzy. Either their photogs & directors (if they use them) or their equipment is the problem. Don't know. I wrote them about it, no response. What I expected!
They have a primitive "voting" mechanism, viewers of both still shoots & vids on SOME of their sites can "vote" using a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 10 (Excellent). But they provide no capability for the member to tell WHY they voted the way they did. So, what's the point of having a "voting mechanism"? And only SOME of the sites within their network have this option, others don't. Inconsistent.
Bottom Line: My guess is that the entire "network" of sites originally spun off from the CatalinaCruz.com site. There are numerous early photos of OTHER MODELS with the CatalinaCruz "watermark" on their affiliate sites.
Pretty pricy considering the mediocrity of their photography; they definitely ain't in the same league as Earl Miller, Suze Randall, or the many other top-notch photogs in the business.
Given the amount of content and fairly frequent updates, I recommend the site(s) in the Ultimate Fantasy Girls network for a couple of months. But you really don't want to pay them $30/month for a long period unless you're just really into their type of stuff. There's better material on the net.

01-26-08  09:45am

Replies (0)
Review
2
Visit CreamPie.com

CreamPie.com
(1)

96.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Tons of material on this site! And, it's all original content, not stuff already seen on other websites!
2. Many new & refreshing faces; some of the girls featured on this site some years back have gone on to be major stars in the porn industry.
3. Great photography, and still shoots of most all of the videos.
4. Videos are fully downloadable, no DRM.
5. Webmaster & folks who run the site know their stuff and are very courteous & helpful.
Cons: 1. No zip (compressed files) for the still shoots, you have to use alternative means to get the full photoshoot.
2. While true that the earlier vids are segmented, the site is rapidly providing full-length HiDef (.wmv format) of many of the former shoots and all of the more recent ones.
3. At times, overemphasis on close ups rather than "full body" shots of the action. I suppose it's what some members want. I prefer full body and a few close ups. But it's still very good photography!
Bottom Line: Due to the amount of material available, the site needs a model index. But I understand that's in the works. This is absolutely the VERY BEST site in this genre on the net! Best value for your money I've seen (and I've seen my share). I've been a member of this site since 2001 and will never leave! I very highly recommend to all creampie fans. You won't be sorry if you join.

12-10-07  08:45pm

Replies (0)
Review
3
Visit Club Austin Kincaid

Club Austin Kincaid
(0)

75.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Lots of material.
2. Austin stays in touch with her fans, very good feedback to members via forum & diary on site.
3. IMO, she's the VERY BEST adult entertainer in the business today.
4. Site is easy to navigate.
5. Zip files for stills and vids are downloadable, a definite plus.
Cons: 1. Site is part of Adult Fantasy Girls, apparently they do the photography for Austin & the rest of the girls in their network. They're NOT Earl Miller! Photography could be improved (both still shoots & videos).
2. Videos and still shoots on the site aren't necessarily sync'd up. In other words, there may or may not be a video for a still shoot.
Bottom Line: Austin has a wonderful personality and does an outstanding job. I expect this site to grow, and it's certainly worth the monthly charge. I certainly highly recommend the site to anyone who wants to see some of the material done by the best female pornstar in the business!

Follow-Up:
After 6+ months of membership to this website, I'm forced to revise my review. I do love this very talented girl. But she's overloaded. What's happened:
1. Updates are much less frequent than advertised.
2. She is no longer communicating with the fans as she once did. 2-3 weeks will elapse between her visits to her forum on the site.
3. Apparently she's using "myspace" as her main communication vehicle now. This takes up a lot of her time, I'm sure.
Given the lack of updates and the sometimes mediocre photography, I'm opting out of my membership at this time. I'll check back in a few months to see if things have improved. :(

12-09-07  06:20pm

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Real Janine

Real Janine
(0)

70.0
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Lots of older material.
Hi Res Photosets (watermarked).
One of the most attractive ladies ever in the adult entertainment biz.
Cons: No zip files for photosets.
Videos not downloadable.
Material dates, updates very infrequent.
When I was a member(several months ago), Janine was putting all her effort into her Myspace crap; this site was essentially dead. And was so stated on her forum. She talked about building a new site, but to my knowledge that never happened.
Bottom Line: Good site if you like Janine & her older material. There may be some newer updates since I left the site, but I ain't going to pay to find out. Site was overpriced for what you get; more "bang for the buck" on other sites which do update and are more friendly to their members.

12-09-07  12:09pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.66 seconds.