| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Creampie Angels
(1)
|
Reply of
Shasta90418's Comment
Thanks very much....if these are fakes as stated, I'll certainly not waste my time or money! Shame on them..of course they're not the only ones doing this. :( Which is one of the reasons that I've stuck with creampie(dot)com...they're honest!! :)
|
06-23-12 09:42am
|
Reply
2
|
Creampie Angels
(1)
|
Reply of
Stas RC's Reply
Why put the prospective customer through this set of hoops? Makes no sense; if there's an alternative billing feature, it should be clearly visible when one attempts to "join" the site, I think.
|
06-23-12 09:40am
|
Reply
3
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I agree with comment #6 by Marcus & #7 by jberryl69! Need that range I believe. Thanks.
|
06-23-12 09:36am
|
Reply
4
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Speaking from experience over the last decade, I can say absolutely yes...I've had some very good, mediocre, and terrible experiences. Guess who I rejoin? I've been a member of one website since 2001 because their content is excellent AND because the webmaster/support team are professional, courteous, and encourage feedback, both good & bad. That counts for a lot to me. OTOH, I've quit websites within the 1st 30 days of joining when I either received no responses or less than courteous responses to my inquiries or comments, even though I don't make many unless there's trouble w/the website.
|
01-10-12 05:32pm
|
Reply
5
|
CreamPie.com
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Review
1. I do agree about the need for "Zip" files for the stillshot collections. It would be very beneficial. And I mentioned it as a "con" in my review of the site.
2. The statement made by this reviewer "There is a very strange, fuzzy black dot in a lot (most?) of the pictures" is true of some of the older photosets. It's my understanding that this was due to an equipment problem which took some time to solve. But this is an anomaly which does not occur in the photosets shot within the past two+ years.
3. Not sure about the "404" error on the "hidden bandwidth limit". I've never hit it. Of course being a member for so long, I just download the full-length vids (if I desire) when they're posted. So I have no experience in trying to download multiple large vids in one session on the site. I will say that the webmaster of this site does an outstanding job (as noted by this reviewer) of supporting the membership.
Agree with this reviewer's comments, a very well written description of this very good website.
|
02-16-08 08:06pm
|
Review
6
|
Ultimate Fantasy Girls
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Lots of content; solos, girl-girl, boy-girl; they seem to really focus on BJ's in the boy-girl shoots.
Hi-Res Photos w/Zip download.
Hi-Res Vids.
Unlimited downloads, no DRM on Vids
Fairly frequent updates. |
| Cons: |
Not all exclusive content.
Photography is mediocre in some cases, particularly true on the FanasyGirlCarmella site pages. I say mediocre because their photogs and/or direcors just can't get poses done correctly to get focus in some shots, so you end up with half the model in focus and half fuzzy. Either their photogs & directors (if they use them) or their equipment is the problem. Don't know. I wrote them about it, no response. What I expected!
They have a primitive "voting" mechanism, viewers of both still shoots & vids on SOME of their sites can "vote" using a scale of 1 (Very Bad) to 10 (Excellent). But they provide no capability for the member to tell WHY they voted the way they did. So, what's the point of having a "voting mechanism"? And only SOME of the sites within their network have this option, others don't. Inconsistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
My guess is that the entire "network" of sites originally spun off from the CatalinaCruz.com site. There are numerous early photos of OTHER MODELS with the CatalinaCruz "watermark" on their affiliate sites.
Pretty pricy considering the mediocrity of their photography; they definitely ain't in the same league as Earl Miller, Suze Randall, or the many other top-notch photogs in the business.
Given the amount of content and fairly frequent updates, I recommend the site(s) in the Ultimate Fantasy Girls network for a couple of months. But you really don't want to pay them $30/month for a long period unless you're just really into their type of stuff. There's better material on the net. |
|
01-26-08 09:45am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
7
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I have mixed feelings about it. Certainly there are some very good porn websites out there. But there are a huge number of new sites which are just pitiful, and they want you to PAY THEM to be a part of it. Sure, porn is big business, both here in the USA & worldwide. And the only way it can be "regulated" (I really dislike that term but can think of nothing better at the moment) if for people to "vote with their money". And this fine review site helps keep 'em honest as well.
|
12-11-07 06:18pm
|
Reply
8
|
Adult Friend Finder
(0)
|
Reply of
LAmahogany's Review
I agree with this review though I've not been a member of AFF for quite some time. Nor will I ever be again. They might've improved, but a couple of years ago when I paid for their "Gold" membership because their system kept telling me it was the best, when I had problems there was NO SUPPORT. They would not reply. The site was cluttered, klunky, and as the reviewer says, filled up with a lot of bogus stuff from "vaporpeople". This site is a waste of both your $$ and your time, you ain't going to get laid via this website unless you're VERY LUCKY. And all the site people care about is getting your hard earned $$$, they could care less about you especially if you have problems with the site. I don't recommend AFF at all, it's a ripoff pure & simple!
|
12-11-07 06:13pm
|
Review
9
|
CreamPie.com
(1)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Tons of material on this site! And, it's all original content, not stuff already seen on other websites!
2. Many new & refreshing faces; some of the girls featured on this site some years back have gone on to be major stars in the porn industry.
3. Great photography, and still shoots of most all of the videos.
4. Videos are fully downloadable, no DRM.
5. Webmaster & folks who run the site know their stuff and are very courteous & helpful. |
| Cons: |
1. No zip (compressed files) for the still shoots, you have to use alternative means to get the full photoshoot.
2. While true that the earlier vids are segmented, the site is rapidly providing full-length HiDef (.wmv format) of many of the former shoots and all of the more recent ones.
3. At times, overemphasis on close ups rather than "full body" shots of the action. I suppose it's what some members want. I prefer full body and a few close ups. But it's still very good photography! |
| Bottom Line: |
Due to the amount of material available, the site needs a model index. But I understand that's in the works. This is absolutely the VERY BEST site in this genre on the net! Best value for your money I've seen (and I've seen my share). I've been a member of this site since 2001 and will never leave! I very highly recommend to all creampie fans. You won't be sorry if you join. |
|
12-10-07 08:45pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
10
|
Club Austin Kincaid
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
1. Lots of material.
2. Austin stays in touch with her fans, very good feedback to members via forum & diary on site.
3. IMO, she's the VERY BEST adult entertainer in the business today.
4. Site is easy to navigate.
5. Zip files for stills and vids are downloadable, a definite plus. |
| Cons: |
1. Site is part of Adult Fantasy Girls, apparently they do the photography for Austin & the rest of the girls in their network. They're NOT Earl Miller! Photography could be improved (both still shoots & videos).
2. Videos and still shoots on the site aren't necessarily sync'd up. In other words, there may or may not be a video for a still shoot. |
| Bottom Line: |
Austin has a wonderful personality and does an outstanding job. I expect this site to grow, and it's certainly worth the monthly charge. I certainly highly recommend the site to anyone who wants to see some of the material done by the best female pornstar in the business!
Follow-Up:
After 6+ months of membership to this website, I'm forced to revise my review. I do love this very talented girl. But she's overloaded. What's happened:
1. Updates are much less frequent than advertised.
2. She is no longer communicating with the fans as she once did. 2-3 weeks will elapse between her visits to her forum on the site.
3. Apparently she's using "myspace" as her main communication vehicle now. This takes up a lot of her time, I'm sure.
Given the lack of updates and the sometimes mediocre photography, I'm opting out of my membership at this time. I'll check back in a few months to see if things have improved. :( |
|
12-09-07 06:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
11
|
Real Janine
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Lots of older material.
Hi Res Photosets (watermarked).
One of the most attractive ladies ever in the adult entertainment biz. |
| Cons: |
No zip files for photosets.
Videos not downloadable.
Material dates, updates very infrequent.
When I was a member(several months ago), Janine was putting all her effort into her Myspace crap; this site was essentially dead. And was so stated on her forum. She talked about building a new site, but to my knowledge that never happened. |
| Bottom Line: |
Good site if you like Janine & her older material. There may be some newer updates since I left the site, but I ain't going to pay to find out. Site was overpriced for what you get; more "bang for the buck" on other sites which do update and are more friendly to their members. |
|
12-09-07 12:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
12
|
CreamPie.com
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thx, I've been using Tmpgenc and it works well to join short .mpeg vid clips. One thing I'd point out is that there are a LOT of full-length video clips in 640x480 resolution available on this (creampie.com) website. You don't need to link those together. Very best, creampiefan :)
|
11-16-07 05:35pm
|
Reply
13
|
CreamPie.com
(1)
|
Reply of
LAmahogany's Review
I've been a member of this website since 2001. I disagree with several statements in the review.
Pros:
1. There is TONS of content on this site!
2. You can't beat the price!
3. All content is ORIGINAL.
4. Great Hi-Res still shots taken DURING the video sessions, not vidcaps.
5. Plenty of full-length (.wmv) vids with more to come.
6. Many of the girls on this site were shot at the beginning of their careers in porn.
7. Support from the site & webmaster is outstanding!
Cons:
1. Lack of compressed (.zip) files for still shoots.
2. Lack of a model index; one is needed...there are a LOT of girls on this site. I'm told that an index is in the works.
All in all, this site gives the best bang for the $$$ I've found in this genre!
|
11-16-07 05:32pm
|
Reply
14
|
All Internal
(0)
|
Reply of
User's Review
Thanks. I've considered this site several times. And every review or comment on it states that the girls are NOT treated well. In fact I've read a couple which have stated that the girls are slapped, etc. I ain't going there, that stuff is horrible! And I won't give any money to an outfit/website which condones such conduct! :(
|
11-16-07 05:23pm
|
