Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : KodiakCS (7)  

Feedback:   All (11)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (5)  |   Replies (1)

Other:   Replies Received (6)  |   Trust Ratings (11)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit ALS Scan

ALS Scan

No Review.
11-14-07  06:09am

Visit Funny BDSM

Funny BDSM

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: Exclusive content
Original and (crazy) ideas
Some very hot eurogirls
Some of the settings are in fact quite funny
Some well made fetish stuff
Cons: Most scenes seem a little "overacted", bondage is often played
Older vids are delivered in VERY bad quality (crappy real format)
BDSM Fans may miss real bondage
No clear update schedule
Bottom Line: The exclusive content and lots of ideas make this site fun and interesting. Some girls seem "into it" while most simply act.
Many will deem the fake violence disgusting (especially in the older vids you'll find knock outs, blood) - So beware !
The preview area shows small vidcap-collages of each scene, so you may check it out and see if you like the content.

All in all this site deserves a little more attention than previously given by TBP.
There are some very hot girls doing nasty stuff. Older videos seem more "authentic" but lack quality, newer ones are more glamorous and main stream but are of much better quality.

11-04-07  01:52pm

Replies (3)
Visit Pleasure Fisting

Pleasure Fisting

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Exclusive content
Some attractive eurogirls (who seem to be into it)
A few really good scenes
Some scenes with full fisting
Good video quality
Cons: Scenes seem to rotate in and out
No real updates (??!)
Plain site design
No real preview area (always suspicious)
Lack of production value (amateurish)
Bottom Line: At first one may think that this site is a pure rip off, but you'll be suprised as it contains around 30 original scenes of euro-fisting-porn (russians?).
The scenes differ in quality, not all girls are that hot and not many "can take it all".
All in all most episodes are rather soft (at least not, what the preview pages suggest).

Bottom line:
This site may be worth a try if you are into fisting stuff - at least it delivers all original content and at least a few scenes are hot.
But because of the rotating content and the missing preview-with-updates-page it may suffice if you only join once...

11-05-07  02:07pm

Replies (0)
Visit RT Bondage

RT Bondage

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: Exclusive content
Original "fantasies"
Some nice looking eurogirls
Preview area with photos every scene
Cons: Bad video quality (Real format)
No real Bondage in most cases
Updates are not that regular
Poor site design
Bottom Line: This site seems to be the trash receptor for funny bdsm (?!), it contains mainly the same kind of forced-sex-fantasy scenes with some rather soft bondage (tied up girls, taped mouths...) but in worse video quality (lower resolution, no WMV etc. so far) and with less creativity and enthusiasm.
Some of the older scenes in very bad video quality seem to be of russian origin and contain rape fantasies...
However the overall sex-level is rather tame, there's some anal sex and deep throating and an occasional peeing event.
The update frequency currently seems to be 1/week but the site is up for years and does not contain that many scenes (around 60-80).

Bottom line:
I don't really know what's the deal here, the bigger brother "funny bdsm" seems to receive more and better input in better quality. Maybe rtbondage is worth joining if you liked this site very much and want to get "all the rest".
Unless this is the case, I think you should spend your 30$ elsewhere...

11-08-07  01:09pm

Replies (0)
Visit Special Exercises

Special Exercises

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: All originial content
Some nice (if rather skinny) eurogirls
Unique idea
At this time the site seems to update rather regularily (once in a week)
OK video quality
Cons: Boring scenes
No "real" bondage
Softcore (almost no sex)
Nudity does not focus on erotic views
Low production value (bad lighting, bad camera-angels)
Poor site design (no browsing)
Bottom Line: I'd say: great idea - lousy realization...
The site contains around 45 scenes (with photos of about 25 of the older ones in the preview area) of "forced" - nude - exercises.
The scenes are very softcore and the force or bondage level is very low as is the exercise/stress level (where is the sweat, girls?).
Some of the girls are hot (many are average) but you won't see much... the level of nudity is low and open legs are an exception...
In addition the camerawork is lacking skill and focus: you could at least try to put the girls in focus and try to catch a glimpse of their sexuality (so that at least the voyeuristic part of the viewer is satisfied).

The bottom line:
There is much work to do before this site gets interesting for the crowd! At this time it seems to be more an experiment with a special fetish than a sexy site.
At least there are regular updates - and the producers are honest and let you comment on any photo/videoshoot (boring is a word you'll often read there).

11-06-07  01:21pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.21 seconds.