Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : whowho (7)  

Feedback:   All (20)  |   Reviews (4)  |   Comments (6)  |   Replies (10)

Other:   Replies Received (20)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

Ratings & Reviews

All the reviews and ratings from this user.
Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Review
1
Visit The Art Of Blow Job

The Art Of Blow Job
(0)

69.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Videos come in a fair quality with 720p and about 6000 kb/s, at least for the updates since 1 year (MP4 is high, WMV and AVI lower resolution. Older Videos as MOV)

- Pictures come as JPG usually with a 4288 x 2848 resolution, size from 1 to 1.4 MB. Set can be downloaded as one ZIP File. Pictures are shoot separately from the videos (no screencaps).

- Regular updates

- The scenes have a very intimate and private atmosphere
Cons: - This site comes with a highly limited variety of content: You will basically always see the same woman and the same man (whose face is never shown) doing a blowjob in almost exactly the same way. The differences between the scenes mostly will be, what the woman wears or how she styled her hair that day.

- Excessive use of focus techniques (Depth of field): While this might give pictures/videos a more artistic touch, in many of the scenes you will be limited to see the penis and the womans lips/nose in detail, while everything else is blurred out. Maybe this is up to personal taste, but i felt like watching porn through a magnifier most of the times.

- This also might be up to personal taste, but *every* scene plays the same style of lounge music, and original sound from the scene is muted at times (e.g. seeing the woman say something without hearing her).

- While i'm sure that the blowjobs that woman gives are enjoyable, you will watch her applying the same bj over and over.
Bottom Line: Basically, you only need to see 1 scene from this site to be able to know how all the other ones are.

While i can understand, that the site owner puts some effort to present something different from the usual mainstream porn, it appears to me quite overdone. Each video ends with the message "We want to spread the message of the beautiful side of porn!", making me wonder if in their opinion that "beauty" is decided by applying focus blur on the video camera and playing lounge music (did they actually licence all those tracks?).

I can recommend that site to people, who have a strong preference on oral sex and don't mind watching the same woman applying the same way to perform a blowjob on the same man in every scene.

Otherwise, this site is highly overpriced for what it has to offer (this being the main reason for my score).

Some minor details:
- Everything is offered as a ZIP File, even a video. Site owner uses a Mac, so you will have annoying "_MACOSX" and ".DS_Store" Systemfolders/files included.
- Almost every scene contains cuts (mostly to change the angle, i guess, since there is no camera operator), you don't see the whole sexual act throughout from beginning to end.

12-12-11  02:11pm

Replies (2)
Review
2
Visit Sperma Studio

Sperma Studio
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Good and reliable download speed (i was able to use my full 6Mbit DSL)
- Mixed type of scenes: very few are 1 on 1, most are group sex with 5-10 male participants and 1-2 girls, always containing facials, some also creampies. Some scenes also include anal.
Cons: - Worst drawback, while being the most important deal, is the video quality and amount. Most downloadable videos are split into at least 2 files of about 15-20 minutes each, you can't download them in one single file. This is not state of the art. Then, what they offer as "HDV" (High Definition) is the lowest possible way of doing it: 720p with about 2875 kBit/s as WMV-Files. They have about 19 scenes offering this quality, everything else (about 200 scenes) is way below and IMHO absolutely not worth a paysite in 2011.
- Way too expensive for what it offers
- Total amount of pictures is currently 5304 with resolutions of 900px × 624px. While having this low resolution, they are taken separately from the video, so it's not just video screenshots. On the other hand, in the videos you are disturbed by photo clicking and flash usage happening all the time.
- I found some models quite ugly
- Browsing the member area is inconvenient and plain: bad example for a user interface
Bottom Line: I had the impression, that while this site wanted to put an effort into offering content in a state of the art quality, they have failed at it.
For the little amount of 720p scenes they have, they have choosen almost the worst possible way by applying low bitrates, and then some of the 720p scenes still look worse than others, making me wonder if they have just upscaled lower resolutions for some of them.
I also really wondered why the offer scenes in splitted files, i haven't seen a paysite doing this since the early '00.

Judging just by the content, they resemble alot of what is known from early GGG productions. The girls look like coming from a more amateur or swinger club related background.
Just to mention it: Some scenes/males include usage of condoms.

Overall, i could only recommend this site for people who are satisfied with DVD-quality and don't mind it being pricey without offering something exceptional.

06-27-11  11:39am

Replies (2)
Review
3
Visit Tranny Surprise

Tranny Surprise
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Excellent quality for the recent downloadable Full HD Videos (1080p, MP4 only, usually between 2 and 3 GB filesize), lower resolutions available (MP4 and WMV)
- Regular, exclusive updates and a large scene archive
- Some of the tranny models look very convincing and pretty
- Good lighting for the scenes
- Whole Reality King network with more than 30 sites is included (no other tranny site though)
- As far as i noticed, there is no download limit and download speed is good and reliable
- Browsing the network and scenes is comfortable, including search functions, categories, commenting and rating features
Cons: - HD quality downloads are only available for updates since October 2010. As of now (March 2011), there are 23 downloadable HD scenes. Older scenes have DVD quality.
- They claim to offer HD for flash streaming. This is not true, since that stream resolution is only 1024x576.
- This is up to personal taste, but i found not all tranny models are equally beautiful. i skipped downloading several scenes for that reason.
- Too little variation on positions and locations
Bottom Line: This site offers you the usual type of tranny content: models from brazil/south america with most, but not all, scenes including use of condoms. It is "man on tranny" most of the time, with only few scenes having threesomes, "tranny on tranny" or "tranny on man".
Most outstanding is the excellent HD video quality for the recent updates and the access to the whole Reality King network.

03-24-11  09:27am

Replies (0)
Review
4
Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club
(3)

75.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large network with a huge amount of content (all gonzo)
- Attractive, natural and very "girl next door" type of models from russia or eastern europe
- The lighting in each scene is good, unlike some other sites they seem to use proper technical equipment and preparation
- Especially for the anal scenes, you can tell the girls had some preparation before the shooting. Most anal scenes are very clean and the girls seem to be relaxed and not bearing pain.
- Good and reliable download speed
- Videos can be downloaded in 1 File or split in smaller sizes, pictures in single files.
- All videos as WMV
Cons: - Browsing the network is ok, but could be alot better: No search functions or model listings, just plain listing of scenes on each site
- On the start pages of each site they claim to have "HD Video". This is NOT to be confused with High Definition (720p or 1080p). The best quality they offer for videos would be 540p, which is far from real High Definition. Nevertheless, the video quality still is acceptable and better than sites offering "DVD Quality".
- The price is too expensive, especially concerning their video quality which is lower than the nowaday state of the art in porn
- They have a very "efficient" way to shoot a scene: There are very few male actors, so prepare to almost always see the same guy around. All the scenes from one site are shot in always the same room. All the rooms from all sites look very similar and are obviously furnished from low priced IKEA items.
- Their attempts to speak english are ridiculous at times.
- "Creampie" is fake
Bottom Line: Biggest drawback is the video quality, which is not High Definition, though they imply so.

Models are natural and beautiful. Scenes are well produced.

Recently added sites like "She Got Six" seem to not include self-produced content.

The whole network seems to move towards retirement with slow updates and non state of the art video quality.

12-31-10  08:36am

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-4 of 4  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.73 seconds.