Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Teen Core Club

Teen Core Club (3)

Active
75
whowho (7) 12-31-10  08:36am
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Large network with a huge amount of content (all gonzo)
- Attractive, natural and very "girl next door" type of models from russia or eastern europe
- The lighting in each scene is good, unlike some other sites they seem to use proper technical equipment and preparation
- Especially for the anal scenes, you can tell the girls had some preparation before the shooting. Most anal scenes are very clean and the girls seem to be relaxed and not bearing pain.
- Good and reliable download speed
- Videos can be downloaded in 1 File or split in smaller sizes, pictures in single files.
- All videos as WMV
Cons: - Browsing the network is ok, but could be alot better: No search functions or model listings, just plain listing of scenes on each site
- On the start pages of each site they claim to have "HD Video". This is NOT to be confused with High Definition (720p or 1080p). The best quality they offer for videos would be 540p, which is far from real High Definition. Nevertheless, the video quality still is acceptable and better than sites offering "DVD Quality".
- The price is too expensive, especially concerning their video quality which is lower than the nowaday state of the art in porn
- They have a very "efficient" way to shoot a scene: There are very few male actors, so prepare to almost always see the same guy around. All the scenes from one site are shot in always the same room. All the rooms from all sites look very similar and are obviously furnished from low priced IKEA items.
- Their attempts to speak english are ridiculous at times.
- "Creampie" is fake
Bottom Line: Biggest drawback is the video quality, which is not High Definition, though they imply so.

Models are natural and beautiful. Scenes are well produced.

Recently added sites like "She Got Six" seem to not include self-produced content.

The whole network seems to move towards retirement with slow updates and non state of the art video quality.

Reply To Review

Review Replies (1)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

pat362 (369) I'm a past member of this network and your review hit pretty much on every point. There are actually 4 sites with leased content. The one you named and you can add hardcore youth, analyzed girls and seductive 18 to the list. It's a very expensive network but you do get a lot of content and they often have the first hardcore scenes of many girls just starting in porn.
01-01-11  06:45am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.