Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (218)  

Feedback:   All (2960)  |   Reviews (115)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2608)

Other:   Replies Received (1452)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 1-25 of 1452 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A REPLY TO #7 from turboshaft: (Drooler's Reply)

I think I first heard "landing strip" in middle school (probably the only knowledge I still retain from then, go figure), so I thought it was American vernacular. I generally think of landing strips as narrower than the "rectangle" the poll is referring to--though to say it could always use more study is an understatement!

As always, Wikipedia has an article on it, and I also found a helpful line drawing comparing the more common styles--see the difference between "Mohawk" and "Landing Strip."

I like to think there is some international board or committee secretly meeting somewhere to standardize the terms and their definitions. :-)


07-16-14  05:31pm

Reply
2
N/A REPLY TO #2 from turboshaft: (Drooler's Reply)

LOL! Thanks for the morning laugh, Drooler!

And we all should've taken Karl Marx's Das Bukkake more seriously. :-)


05-30-14  10:51am

Reply
3
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Cybertoad: (Drooler's Reply)

Yea but there is always next years new porn niche LOL

05-21-14  08:52am

Reply
4
N/A REPLY TO #5 from lk2fireone: (Drooler's Reply)

Drooler, I'm not an expert on Chrome, since I just bought my first Chromebook a few days ago, and I am still learning how to use it.

But if you have a lot of Microsoft office documents that you use, you can use Microsoft Office Web Apps, for compability with your existing office documents. It's free for individuals, but not for businesses.

Otherwise, if you have no previous Microsoft office documents that you have to deal with, you can use the other free apps for Chrome.

Since Microsoft is giving the Microsoft Office Web Apps away for free, to hold onto their customer base (even those that are using Chrome), I would guess that there shouldn't be a lot of problems with using your older Microsoft Office documents with a Chromebook.

That's only a guess. Because personal experinence is the deal breaker.

I couldn't stand Win 8.1, because Win 7 was so much easier to use (after migrating from Win XP, which I really liked).

But some people are technically mobile, and maybe they even appreciate the new Win 8 OS.

But so far, at least, I really like the Chromebook. And it's so fucking cheap. And fast. And you don't have to worry about viruses, and software updates, etc. The software updates automatically, when you're connected to the web. But my desktop Win 7 has to shut down for updates, and then restart, and I'm always running virus scans, and the Chromebook just seems to be so much easier to use and problem free. At least so far.

I don't like the keyboard on the Chromebook, or the touchpad, so I added a wireless keyboard and mouse to the Chromebook.
That was easy to do, and only cost $40 for the Logitech Wireless Wave Combo Mk550 With Keyboard and Laser Mouse from Amazon.

So I'm good to go, as I learn to use the Chromebook.


05-18-14  09:03am

Reply
5
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Cybertoad: (Drooler's Reply)



I agree, there are so many models that are smokin hot bodies and then they go get all implanted and come out looking like Joan Rivers.


05-18-14  08:33am

Reply
6
Visit VirtuaGirl

VirtuaGirl
(0)
REPLY TO #2 from Dorsai6: (Drooler's Reply)

Over the past 6 months, I've earned a variety of free credits and other upgrades. All have been delivered on time and as promised. I agree that tech support leaves a lot to be desired.

04-19-14  09:00am

Reply
7
Visit Kscans

Kscans
(0)
REPLY TO #4 from littlejoe: (Drooler's Reply)

i know, thats why i said for a single month membership, implying i wouldnt stick around for updates

03-12-14  07:01pm

Reply
8
N/A REPLY TO #6 from RagingBuddhist: (Drooler's Reply)

"now added to the browser dictionary"

I'm honored?
Although I don't mind being underlined/highlighted either. : - )


03-05-14  06:38pm

Reply
9
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

Yes & too all, my apologies for the rant.

02-28-14  07:27am

Reply
10
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Khan: (Drooler's Reply)

... we don't trust them and they don't care.

It's funny but for years now I've been saying, "if the people knew the truth, they'd drag their leaders through the streets."


02-27-14  02:59pm

Reply
11
N/A REPLY TO #4 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

Well now - you nailed the hammer in the center didn't you?

Pharms, as you surely know, are not the only ones who use lobbyists to get their way. As I've continuously said, Follow the Money.

Lobbyists have contributed greatly to legislators ability to become millionaires WHILE they are legislating bills that gives big business what they want.

Republican & President Dwight D Eisenhower warned of this phenomenon during his Presidency of the Military Industrial Complex, though his scope was limited to his experience, (5 Star General in WW2). He failed to recognize that he only had to drop "Military" from the statement and he would have been succinct in the warning - which, of course, America ignored.

We really don't have a democracy. What we have is a Big Business Controlled country. While we want big business to succeed in their endeavors - just not at the American people's expense.

According to a Gallup poll from 2002, the majority of the American people believe our government doesn't represent the will of the people. It's distressing because I don't think we will be able to turn it around going forward.


02-27-14  09:45am

Reply
12
N/A REPLY TO #2 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

The VA only provides four of them (for a fee at $2.00 a pop) a month. Wonder how they came up with that number. And like I said, I don't always need it, it just makes it easier to stroke it off. I respect your answer though, yet you have to admit, your doctors probably given you drugs which might be considered "tinkering" products. It's amazing - truly mind boggling actually - how well pharmaceutical companies do $$$$$$$$$$$

02-23-14  09:29am

Reply
13
Visit Teen Models

Teen Models
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment from yote78:

Yes, you are absolutely right. I too have noticed that they are consistently posting content (both pictorial and video) originally produced in the mid-2000s and sometimes somewhat earlier. But I don't really mind all that much b/c those models are some of my all-time faves (Gina, Lola, Jenny S. Anetta K, Ally, Eufrat...just to name a few), and virtually all their "new" sets and vids are content that I haven't seen before.

What really bugs me, however, is how TM seems to be phasing out new video content (see my 1/14/14 comment). Really a shame, if that is indeed the case. They've given me some of the best stuff in my collection and now it seems I may not be getting any more from them. Hope I'm wrong. We'll see, I guess...


01-12-14  08:30pm

Reply
14
N/A REPLY TO #1 from LPee23: (Drooler's Reply)

I love it, and I have wondered if there is a genetic difference too. Genetic differences do affect our sexuality, as many scientists and advocates for LGBT rights are increasingly showing. Pee is involved in the sexuality of a small number of non-human mammals, and there it is almost certainly genetic. There may be a gene in humans, who really knows? I just know I was interested in pee from as early as I can remember, so that interest was always a part of me.

12-15-13  12:57pm

Reply
15
N/A REPLY TO #11 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

Damn Drooler, I hope you don't think that I think I'm right in views. I understand and it was just a tease since all the prior comments were "NO TOYS". Sorry if you misunderstood. No offense intended sir!!

11-24-13  04:15pm

Reply
16
N/A REPLY TO #7 from Monahan: (Drooler's Reply)

Ditto, too.

11-17-13  02:55pm

Reply
17
N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (Drooler's Reply)

Sharp observance, droller! I Think it Sailed right over everybody else's head.
"Title of a Porn flick?" .... indeed!
Just be sure who's name shows up on screen amongst film credits.


10-21-13  08:01pm

Reply
18
N/A REPLY TO #5 from Monahan: (Drooler's Reply)

You can add, "artsy fartsy" to the list where the producer includes visual and sound effects that make it impossible to get aroused by the central purpose of a porn flick. One more add is ridiculous heavy metal music repeating over and over. Finally is aq cameraman who spends way too much time looking up the dude's asshole while he's porking the gorgeous babe who is out of sight.

10-14-13  08:58am

Reply
19
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Wittyguy: (Drooler's Reply)

It would be great to know which relatives want which part of your collection - I didn't realize cousin Joey was such a big d.p. fan ;)

10-06-13  02:49pm

Reply
20
Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
(4)
Reply of Drooler's Comment from wetandpuffy:

Good morning,

Many thanks for your feedback , I appreciate you high lighting this problem and bringing it to our attention.

We have now started to work on this issue and will have it resolved very soon.

Until that point you can always browse with our network site puffynetwork.com

Your membership gives you free access to it.

Regards


09-20-13  10:40pm

Reply
21
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
Reply of Drooler's Comment from lk2fireone:

That's a problem common to all the sites in the Met Art network.

Years ago, before Met Art became a network, I could look at the thumbnails of the covers and see what the models looked like.

Now, I have to open each gallery individually, to get a clear idea of what the model looks like.

Not as convenient, takes much more time and effort.


07-22-13  05:29am

Reply
22
Visit Teen Dreams

Teen Dreams
(1)
REPLY TO #3 from Denner: (Drooler's Reply)

Sure, Drooler...had I never been here, I'd probably go crazy with all that older archived material filled with "goodies".

07-09-13  05:35am

Reply
23
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

Just click on a photo of a girl, it should take you to a thumbnail page of about 8 -12 photos - then click on an individual photo to blow it up. But I must post this disclaimer - as I pointed out, I haven't received one of these e-mails since Aug 2011, so it's possible they might have changed how it works.

05-25-13  12:05pm

Reply
24
N/A REPLY TO #7 from jberryl69: (Drooler's Reply)

Funny Drooler and well expressed sarcasm!

05-02-13  05:32am

Reply
25
N/A REPLY TO #5 from luv lickn clit: (Drooler's Reply)

Yeah Drooler, its really annoying how some sites like CNN.com have pop-ups (pop-up fucking anyway) that defeat any blocker I've tried!

05-01-13  09:31pm


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 1-25 of 1452 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.58 seconds.