| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#19
from lk2fireone:
(mbaya's Reply)
One major problem with letting cats outside is they often get into fights with other cats. And until you take your cat to a vet, you don't realize how expensive a vet can be. I was spending more on vet bills than I was spending on myself for doctor visits. $100 to see a vet because my cat got some scratches. Why that cat loved to fight so much I'll never know, because he never seemed to win.
And he hated going to the vet. Hated the car ride, didn't like the vet's office.
|
07-02-11 09:30am
|
Reply
52
|
Bukkake Bath
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from manholelover:
A really interesting review.
Whilst i'm into gay porn, I'm also familiar with the Japanese censorship, as this is also rife in the gay market, usually the holes are blurred out. I also can find the videos just as entertaining, as for me porn isn't just about the genitals, but just as much about the attractiveness of the person, the scenario, the context and the performance, as well as the individual fetish. i haven't looked at the previews, but would be interested to know if the male genitals are also censored, and if not, what the logic is behind this.
|
06-30-11 02:25pm
|
Reply
53
|
Sperma Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from gggfan:
(mbaya's Reply)
Totally agree with what mbaya said.
If you're not really onto amateur creampie gangbangs, it's not worth the money ; otherwise it is as it's one of (if not the only) the rare site offering this kind of stuff.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm still a member as I'm too eager to get their updates as soon as they are released ...
|
06-30-11 01:53pm
|
Reply
54
|
Strip Game Central
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Ed2009:
Any chance of updating this review?
I guess it's a drawback in giving such a detailed rundown of a site, that it will go out of date much faster.
There are now well over 4x as many videos (newest ones in Full HD), the recurring membership price has dropped significantly. (You can also buy almost all the videos individually without joining but the cost there is restricted by Clips4Sale's minimum price per minute). SGC is also billed via Verotel as well as CCBill.
There are a few other improvements and additions but I'll leave that up to a review to tell everyone - I don't want to get accused of writing my own review!
|
06-28-11 02:12am
|
Reply
55
|
German Goo Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review from mbaya:
I had to cancel by email as there is no link to a site for the biller. The pricing options I was offered are as follows: "If the reason for leaving is cost, I can offer some of our employee specials. 19.94/ 1 month membership, 29.94/ 3 months membership, 49.94/6 months membership, 79.94/ 1 year membership." 19.94 for a month is not bad.
|
06-23-11 02:13pm
|
Reply
56
|
Fraternity X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from manholelover:
(mbaya's Reply)
I'm learning fast. That's why I'm loving this site. I already don't know how I managed without it. It's really going to enhance my porn using experience!
|
06-22-11 03:53pm
|
Reply
57
|
Straight Hell
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from manholelover:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks for the tip. I'll post in the forum now.
|
06-22-11 03:48pm
|
Reply
58
|
Fraternity X
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from manholelover:
(mbaya's Reply)
Probably. Am a bit new to this reviewing game so still learning. The content is great, but as I'm having problems downloading at the moment, the DRM issue isn't too bad until i get my equipment sorted out. But thanks for the comment.
|
06-22-11 03:42pm
|
Reply
59
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thank you, mbaya. I needed that! :-)
|
06-10-11 06:20pm
|
Reply
60
|
Real Couples
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment from mbaya:
I see that the site no longer has this posted on it.
|
06-09-11 08:07pm
|
Reply
61
|
We Love Bukkake
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from messmer:
Thanks for the detailed review, mbaya. I think your "the sites have a genuine amateur feel" has won me over and I just put the network under favorites so I won't forget it once all my present subscriptions are up. The tour helped as well. I like the true amateur look.
|
06-09-11 03:19pm
|
Reply
62
|
Pornstar Network
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thanks, mbaya! :-)
|
06-09-11 09:03am
|
Reply
63
|
Sperma Studio
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from creampielover:
(mbaya's Reply)
Thank you very much mbaya for your reply. That does seem to be a rather small percentage of videos with creampies. However, I suppose I should have added that since they are so difficult to find on other sities, the quality of the creampie gangbang videos could still be sufficient reason to join (in spite of their relatively small number). The reviews by gggfan seemed to be very enthusiastic about that point. If you have any thoughts about that, please let me know. Thanks for your help.
|
06-05-11 10:10am
|
Reply
64
|
Exxxposers
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Denner:
I noticed the 69 score at TBP - but the preview looks kind of ok/special......but I'd never again get used to what we all know here as "low quality".
Thanks for the warning......
|
06-05-11 10:00am
|
Reply
65
|
Sperma Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from creampielover:
I have been looking for sites that focus on, or contain creampie gangbang videos (with multiple creampies in the same scene). I have found 2 sites that have these kinds of videos: cathyscraving.com and gina-blonde.com . Gina-blonde has some good creampie gangbang videos (with multiple creampies), but the lightning and camera angles in some of the scenes is not very good and fewer than half of the scenes on the site actually contain creampies. The site was also a bit pricey (30 U.S. dollars) when I joined for 1 month late last year. There have been no new creampie videos added since then.
I am seriously considering joining the sperma-studio site. The price for joining seems a bit high (currently around 34 U.S. dollars). However, after reading some of the reviews here (especially by mbaya and gggfan), it appears to be worth it. I know gggfan also likes creampie gangbang videos. Before joining, I would like to know how many videos on the site actually contain scenes with multiple creampies (more than half or less than half)? Also, are the lightning and camera angles good? Thank you very much for your help.
|
06-05-11 06:13am
|
Reply
66
|
Josh Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from HeyManNiceShot:
I'll second mbaya's review. It's up to 155 videos, doesn't seem to be expanding very fast. A lot of it seems repetitive, but it is entertaining, and there are some hot models. This is a good one to join for a month and move on.
|
06-03-11 12:57pm
|
Reply
67
|
Sperma Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from gggfan:
Excellent review mbaya. I couldn't agree more with what you wrote, although for me .flv format is not such a minus (vlc reads this format easily).
|
06-02-11 11:39am
|
Reply
68
|
California Beach Feet
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from JakeOLantern:
(mbaya's Reply)
I weighed that myself. The fact is that although the navigation sucks and it has a DL limit, the content is so extensive and so high quality that I upped my original 55 to 70 based on that.
It's like he wins the gold on 3 criteria, but totally bombs on the other 3. It would be a 50, stragiht half if the content wasn't so HQ. Fact is that I would join again in a year just to see what great pics and vids have been put up in the past year, it would just suck that it would take me all month to get through it because of the interface and DL limits.:)
|
06-01-11 07:45pm
|
Reply
69
|
Real Couples
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from tangub:
It seems like they are admitting they don't put enough time and effort into bringing quality updates, if they did then the positive reviews would follow as a matter of course.
|
05-29-11 09:25am
|
Reply
70
|
Real Couples
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
from Khan:
appreciate the heads up
|
05-29-11 06:32am
|
Reply
71
|
Suburban Amateurs
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from messmer:
(mbaya's Reply)
I would have preferred better videos myself, mbaya, a more competitive site would have at least 720p movies available, so I am practically forcing myself to like the more antiquated format because the material comes so close to what I am looking for. :-(
|
05-25-11 06:31pm
|
Reply
72
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
from Capn:
I have to agree with you on this one.
It is an unique site.
The models, costumes, photography & effects are first rate. Navigation is a little flaky IIRC, which detracts from the 'story' element somewhat.
As you quite rightly point out though, it is really a photography, not video site.
Cap'n. :0)
|
05-15-11 04:27am
|
Reply
73
|
Dancing Bear
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from raffles:
(mbaya's Reply)
still no download at "dancing Bear"-only streaming and that too not smooth
|
05-13-11 11:20pm
|
Reply
74
|
The Upper Floor
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Jay G:
(mbaya's Reply)
I was all ready to join the new site also despite the limited number of scenes, but the $39.99 price tag made me delay for now.
I love seeing multiple naked women and actually kind of like tattoos, but I would sure like to see more (and better photographed) sex.
The unscripted format leaves the camera person struggling and even when there is sex, the views don't measure up to other Kink.com photography.
I remember one scene with three women under the table that could have been in any R-rated movie because not once was the camera person able to catch a decent view of the action.
|
05-13-11 11:17am
|
Reply
75
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Varietas S BV:
(mbaya's Reply)
Yes, we are working on that right now and should expect to see 1080 x 1920 on our network of sites in the near future. This will probably only apply to new videos though.
Cheers
John
Varietas Services BV
|
05-13-11 08:18am
|
