| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Hanna Hilton
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from marcdc1:
(Monahan's Reply)
I feel bad for not being able to be more positive, but what can you say about a site that hasn't been updated in THAT long, and is rather small to boot?
I'll be reviewing Ashley Fires site soon (part of the same network), As I'll write in that review - she is worth the joining fee alone!
I do have to say that network includes enough that I definitely got my money's worth. My thing is I want people to know that the site they may really be interested in isn't updating anymore.
Be Well-
|
08-19-12 06:05pm
|
Reply
27
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#11
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
I should probably point out that the problems I had (they seem to be fixed now) seemed to be mostly associated with VB3 and the add-on channels that require VB3.
And I sure agree with you on the content issues. I stand by my position that VB could improve by offering one or two good updates per day rather than five crappy ones. And the constant use of repackaged and reposted scenes in a major annoyance. The only good news is that the other users will usually point out a repost.
|
08-06-12 09:39am
|
Reply
28
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from xexbot:
(Monahan's Reply)
That does sound like so BS. Sorry to hear that. I have had no problems with them, but I did join after the split. In fact, the split is what kept me from joining for so long because I was basically interested in about half of what they offered in each.
I won't try to defend them and I certainly understand your frustration. At the same time as big as these sites and this network is getting, the split was inevitable. The alternative would have probably been to start raising the prices. From a sales-perspective, that very well could have been a death sentence for their business. It's really hard to get people to join sites for over twenty dollars these days. I think they screwed up in how they divided the site. They should have made 21 Sextreme an actual addition, because that's really what it is anyway, and just charged an extra ten bucks a month to add it on. Or they could have made it more "extreme" period so that it can stand on its own.
|
07-30-12 12:33pm
|
Reply
29
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#12
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
On the duplicated content, the only place I ran into a lot of overlap was on the biggest known stars. Like Eva Angelina, Jenaveve Jolie, the ones with 100+ scenes. If you search more by the DVD series than individual models, the overlap isn't bad at all and as my comment below about Tainster shows, Tainster's webmaster said they have an exclusive deal with Videosz to have their DVDs of their exclusive content. I'm going to do a multi-month membership this time just because I don't feel like I saw maybe 1/10th of what all they have.
|
07-16-12 02:04pm
|
Reply
30
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#10
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
Monahan - I'm reluctant to give you a definitive answer because I haven't been a member at Videosz for a while and for some reason I didn't review the site so I have nothing to help my memory. My recollection, though, is that while there is some overlap that it wasn't too bad. I recall that I though both sites were still a good value and that both were worthwhile. Consider posting this query on the forum and you may get some better answers.
I wish I could be of more assistance...
|
07-16-12 01:09pm
|
Reply
31
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from rearadmiral:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks for the comments. I agree that when a scene is posted as a compilation the users usually identify that and many even note the difference. In a lot of cases one scene has been edited and runs shorter.
I also agree that it is frustrating that the site gets so many performer's names wrong. But again, the users usually step in and provide the name.
And thanks to everyone else who took the time to reply.
|
07-15-12 03:26pm
|
Reply
32
|
VideoBox
(12)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from lk2fireone:
(Monahan's Reply)
I think your reply was the funniest thing I've read all day. You give me hope that there is a silver lining in every cloud. We just have to look for it.
|
06-30-12 05:25pm
|
Reply
33
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
Glad it worked!
|
06-13-12 06:20am
|
Reply
34
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#6
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
Weird! What happens if you enter the address directly in the browser?
www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=21865
by copying and pasting rather than clicking.
If that doesn't work, it will probably be a matter of things like traceroute, given that it is working for some of us.
|
06-12-12 03:32am
|
Reply
35
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from RustyJ:
Just tried on Firefox, opens ok for me.
|
06-12-12 02:23am
|
Reply
36
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#3
from Claypaws:
(Monahan's Reply)
The link is working for me, with Firefox. You are clicking the "visit site" link, aren't you?
|
06-11-12 03:55pm
|
Reply
37
|
21Sextury.com
(10)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from Khan:
seemed to work ok just now when I tested it. Let us know if you're still having problems.
|
06-11-12 02:00am
|
Reply
38
|
Divine Breasts
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from BubbaGump:
(Monahan's Reply)
Hi. Thanks. I just try to tell it like I see it. It is easy to write long-winded reviews on sites that rub you the wrong way as you are ticked off enough to vent about it.
Anyways, I wouldn't classify the entire site as junk, just the user experience and treatment. The content is actually fairly decent for this genre. I have seen better and I have seen worse. I suspect most people interested in this genre would come away with positive opinions if the site owners didn't play the games. Considering a magazine today costs somewhere around $15, paying $21 for a modest collection of BBW erotica is really not a bad deal. The owners just play games and hold back content, as mentioned in the review. It becomes obvious after a a little bit of time at the site what the owners are up to.
|
06-10-12 09:04am
|
Reply
39
|
Reality Gang
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from t9chome:
(Monahan's Reply)
Been awhile since I was a member, so I tried the PU link and exited the page, but the best offer they could muster was $19.99, so I just opted for the regular PU discount of $17.99.
|
06-09-12 11:30am
|
Reply
40
|
Twistys
(6)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from exotics4me:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thank you, I'm getting the feeling this is becoming a normal trend for the more established sites to rest on the laurels, so to speak, had a membership at Sapphic Erotica and while it's still a good site, I can't tell much difference in the content shot in 2008 and 2012.
|
05-28-12 06:38am
|
Reply
41
|
Scoreland
(1)
|
REPLY TO
#8
from messmer:
(Monahan's Reply)
Thanks, Monahan. I just got finished with a subscription to ScoreHD because someone else had re-assured me on that site's page that all material could be downloaded. :-)
And I agree, there's HD (ho hum) and there's HD (wow) .. too bad Brazzers features so many fake breasts because their HDs are of the WOW kind, same with FTV, same with ITC. 21Sextreme/Sextury is not bad either but in their case too many of their sites are updated in DVD quality rather than in HD so I always have to wait 6 months or so before I re-subscribe in order to get enough downloads of HD material together.
|
05-26-12 01:36pm
|
Reply
42
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#4
from Toadsith:
(Monahan's Reply)
Yeah, sometimes Time Warner doesn't put in enough connections which can be quite annoying. It is the reason I used DSL with its guaranteed download speeds back when broadband connections were new. I'm in a very rural area, so usage is pretty low making the cable connection far superior to other options.
|
05-24-12 09:49am
|
Reply
43
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#13
from Marcus:
(Monahan's Reply)
Oh I definitely agree with that, I would class that as being in a similar vein to pop ups and pop overs/unders in that it does interfere with your enjoyment of the website.
|
05-11-12 11:06am
|
Reply
44
|
Bangbros Network
(7)
|
REPLY TO
#7
from pat362:
(Monahan's Reply)
I love Brazzer and I gave that site a bigger score so I can't very well punish this one for having the fake boobies. escpecially when they seem to still have more of the natural kind than Brazzer.
|
05-11-12 11:01am
|
Reply
45
|
Reality Kings
(10)
|
REPLY TO
#1
from MiztaBlu:
(Monahan's Reply)
Actually, I just kind of tossed out that number, but there are at least 5. One girl named Lexxy on the MonsterCurves site (believe she had another scene as well). There are a few chicks on MILFHunter, CumFiesta and 8thStreetLatinas who I havent seen elsewhere that are ridiculously hot.
So actually, its probably more than 5, but the reason I like them so much may also be because they havent shot anywhere else, and that rarity makes it more appealing.
And you are right on about the more natural girls than on the other sites, but I wouldnt know where to include that anyway, because many see that as a positive, and many see it as a negative. BIG POSITIVE for me though.
|
05-05-12 12:26pm
|
Reply
46
|
abbywinters
(5)
|
REPLY TO
#5
from s1vus1:
(Monahan's Reply)
LOL very true
|
04-25-12 06:07am
|
Reply
47
|
N/A
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Beyond Bambi:
(Monahan's Reply)
I totally agree.
|
04-18-12 04:47am
|
Reply
48
|
Sex Art
(2)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from otoh:
Looks like it might actually have some eroticism, compared to Met Art - worth keeping an eye on. And glad to see Alexis Texas on there, although I'm not generally into mainstream hardcore material, I'm quite fond of her.
I note with some amusement that they are still going with the ludicrous set names of Met Art - eg Stalagmitis, Prothimo, Falos (no, really)...
|
04-16-12 09:33am
|
Reply
49
|
Sex Art
(2)
|
REPLY TO
#2
from Drooler:
(Monahan's Reply)
Actually, the two-month deal on offer is $30, nearly, so it's a hair (you know which kind) cheaper than the TBP price, on a per-month basis.
I got the email with that offer and accepted it. The site has some good things going for it, I'd say: good download speed, view settings that can be saved by the user, good thumbnail size, and the usual quality photography.
And the babes.
It really is a "harder" kind of Met-Art. In many of the photo sets, the girls indulge themselves with plastic phalluses or ben-wa balls or each other or a guy. So for those who've been wanting to have that kind of "all," it's here.
Personally, I don't like this kind of content as much as the regular, soft-serve Met-Art kind but, you know, a fool and his tax refund are soon parted!
|
04-15-12 08:04am
|
Reply
50
|
Sex Art
(2)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
from cjd2004:
If you are on the Met Art group mailing list, the launch announcement email includes a two for one offer for the first two months.
|
04-14-12 08:24pm
|
