Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jberryl69 (12)  

Feedback:   All (668)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (15)  |   Replies (647)

Other:   Replies Received (227)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 227 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A REPLY TO #9 from Cybertoad: (jberryl69's Reply)

Hi JB,

I actually have the Sensovox Em140, it is a great unit you can even use it with music thats pretty cool. It made in the UK.

Cost Mine retail is 410.00 as you might see on Ebay, I got a deal for $350.00 with extras new. From a guy who cut me a deal.

I had been looking at some in the 400+ range but this has an incredible control, very customized, and you can use two channels = 4 electrodes.
Chose this one because it has many nice options of the 500+ units and is much better then anything in the 300- range. I wanted quality and variable settings this has knobs and digital read outs, runs on 9v or AC, and is very very easy. I like that it can start a slow pace and then when your ready knock your socks off. I will say there are times you think you could pass out if the feeling was anymore pleasurable.
To those of us whom us the 5 finger system, this blows anything thing away in my opinion. Hope that helps. PS, the feeling of a JB and BJ are very real, works awesome with your favorite vid you would swear you there , it can be a great experience and allow you to control the big O until you are ready, its edged close to an hour thats how much control it has.

PS JB a person can get a tens unit for well under 100 I tried those and then this and I wasted my money on tens LOL. Not even in the same ball park,


01-29-14  03:03pm

Reply
27
N/A REPLY TO #23 from David19: (jberryl69's Reply)

Wow...this is an old poll but I just logged on and was quite sorry to see that my innocent question was somehow seen as a personal attack on Graymane--when it was certainly not intended as such.

For one thing, the main page--where one first sees these polls--doesn't, so far as I can see, list the person who originated the poll. So my initial reaction to and opinion of a poll is formed before I find out who originated the poll--and therefore shouldn't be seen as a personal attack on the pollster.

Yes, of course the stereotype is that most users of porn are male. But I never like to work from stereotypes--they are often, but not always, correct. I'm actually a very, very regular lurker on here--although I usually come here as a guest and don't feel the need to log on. Most discussions, it seems to me, discuss porn in an objective, general, sense--but without information that would really reveal the gender of the poster. And--again--that is an opinion that I've formed on here as a very regular reader of these forums. So I wanted to understand why someone was assuming that most posters were male--when I really didn't see any solid evidence of it.

I hadn't know that people's gender was listed in their profiles.


01-19-14  08:57pm

Reply
28
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Drooler: (jberryl69's Reply)

I don't know how to break the shocking news to you, but not everyone likes what you like. I hope that's not a big problem for you. You're going to run into that sometimes, you know.

There's no need for you to tell the world that you're petty and intolerant over the fact that your tastes and the tastes of others might be at variance once in a while.


11-24-13  03:44pm

Reply
29
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Guilty as charged ...... but I still lov'ya, big guy.

11-24-13  09:12am

Reply
30
N/A REPLY TO #7 from ebal: (jberryl69's Reply)

wow i like this sie, lovely very good

no words


11-13-13  09:09am

Reply
31
N/A REPLY TO #3 from Khan: (jberryl69's Reply)

Well, there's really two reasons I posted this question.

First, and probably foremost, is the fact that, because we ask a lot of poll questions, many of them are repeats. So, every once in a while I like to try to come up with something we haven't asked before.

The 2nd reason was because, over a period of a week or so, I noticed that a lot of the tv show ads (both for shows and products) seemed to focus on sex or at least, sex appeal. I wondered if our users here thought that mainstream media might be getting overly saturated with this one subject.

Now, being as our users enjoy porn, I'd guess that they'd think "the more the merrier" when it comes to sex. But hey, you never know until you ask, right?

Bottom line, it's just a poll question. No real deep dark hidden meaning behind it.


11-05-13  10:30am

Reply
32
N/A REPLY TO #2 from Khan: (jberryl69's Reply)

All our poll questioins don't have to be about porn. It's just a poll question ... if you don't like this one, skip over it. BTW, this one was first asked back in the summer of 2010

10-08-13  08:12am

Reply
33
N/A REPLY TO #11 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Always a pleasure having you drop in JB!
Your reply reminds me of a pretty, yet quite prudish and proper gal I once dated. During our moments of heated petting, I was allowed to go anywhere except near her tits ....the reason, I suspected, was her self-conscious secret of wearing falsies over a flat chest.

My last date with her, determined to find out what's under that guarded property, ended when my hand strayed to her breast.
As my hand was tearing through all that foam, she screamed out:
(are you ready for this?)

Her utterance:....."HERE, HERE!"
My immediate reply ...."WHERE, WHERE"?


10-05-13  02:44pm

Reply
34
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Monahan: (jberryl69's Reply)

Off topic, but what makes scenes with prolapses erotic? That I just do not get.

10-05-13  10:45am

Reply
35
N/A REPLY TO #17 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

I know it's getting down to the wire for this operation you've been rather up-tight about, so I just wanted to pass along a few thoughts before you take leave from the forum.
I know you're gettin' tired of hearing this, "but it's gonna be all right." You're gonna awaken from this thing flying high under "Love potion number nine, and hopefully having a wet dream of your fav. having her tonsils stretched by your rock-hard "wow-guy!"

Ok, that's the good part!
But it gets better: Just remember, soaring high's remain at just an IV away.
Then there's that welcomed TLC on its way that hasn't been around for awhile ......doing catch-up.

Lastly .......I'll tell you what my surgeon told me. "I can't repair the damage already done, but I'll guarantee stopping it in its tracks towards very possibly your becoming paraplegic.
You don't get that kind of insurance from the yellow pages, my friend.

I haven't been one to chat, or ask for anything on a regular basis from the Almighty, but I shall, on your behalf, make an earnest effort doing so until you're outta the woods.
Good luck, my friend.


10-01-13  02:26pm

Reply
36
N/A REPLY TO #14 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

And thank you, my good sir, for pointing out that egregious FAUX PAS.

"Shame, shame, graymane ......now put on this dunce-cap and go over there and sit in the corner 'till you can stop butchering our wonderful history ..... as well as apologizing to our grand, renowned and respected world-scholars" "Particularly Mr. Aristotle".

But'cha know, JB .... It's doggone worth taking a few "slings an arrows" just to know you're still coming around.


09-29-13  04:42pm

Reply
37
N/A REPLY TO #11 from turboshaft: (jberryl69's Reply)

I imagine that trying to explain phenomena like rosebuds or vacuum pumping to future generations will be something akin to trying to rationalize embarrassments from our past like patent medicines or the insane nuclear buildup during the Cold War. There were few genuinely positive things to say about them but they seemed like the right idea at the time.

09-29-13  10:38am

Reply
38
N/A REPLY TO #15 from Randyman: (jberryl69's Reply)

I know, I was just tossing the sarcasm right back. All is good, just fun and games.

07-21-13  04:36pm

Reply
39
N/A REPLY TO #12 from Randyman: (jberryl69's Reply)

My poll, my rules. No, I don't "watch" the dl. I figure it's adding to your collection so it mine as well count.

07-21-13  12:25pm

Reply
40
N/A REPLY TO #8 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Hey big guy....... I trust don't take my parting comment the way it might look.
Your humorous response ("Why yes it does, thank you very much")
got me thinkin' how a less perceptive guy might've taken it.
I knew, however, you'd take it in the spirit that it was intended .


06-12-13  05:44am

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Good question, jb.
The night Joan pulled the plug was one I'd made an excuse for as to why I couldn't escort her to an important function to which we both were associated. I'd made the fatal mistake of rather choosing to go out with a babe I'd just met who was free on that night.
The affixed, burning image I've maintained of the physically super endowments bestowed on this lady I'd turned down on that fateful day, leaves me not surprised that on that same evening and at the same function, she'd meet a well-heeled gentleman who was so smitten with her that (while carrying out business in Atlanta) hardly let her out of his sight ......and who later had her airborne on the way to his home in California.
This news was delivered on the next day when I called her.
All my smooth talk and released anguish, in an effort to revive our relationship never came out ....'cause as painful as it were, even at the expense of going the marriage route, it was clear this guy had all the aces, as well as her heart, and would give her a better life.
Being the bright gal that she is......she innately read all this in my voice. Her reply: "Gee, hon, if you'd only showed me you cared enough."
That brings up my own thought on the matter: "if only I had gone with her as she'd asked?

Does that answer your question, partner?


06-11-13  12:06am

Reply
42
N/A REPLY TO #2 from lk2fireone: (jberryl69's Reply)

jberryl69, in some of my reviews I tend to ramble, but your comment goes all over the place.

I read Tarzan when I was an early teen, and I don't remember Jane being raped. And I'm sure (because ERB was writing in a different climate than the current one) that Jane was utterly pure when she married Tarzan. Tarzan might have kissed her before marriage, but even though they were both living together in the jungle before they were married, there was absolutely no hanky-panky going on. Not like modern times.

Your comment reminds me that I enjoyed Tarzan and also John Carter of Mars when I was much younger. I will try to read some of them again, to see if I can still find pleasure in reading them today, or if my tastes (and ideas) have changed too much.


06-06-13  08:10am

Reply
43
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Jay G: (jberryl69's Reply)

I enjoyed the discussion. Those who call you to task on PC words are showing their power. You really find this in Universities where "everyone is equal, but some are more equal than others."

And I'll bet they still call those women who work for them by first names (Jill, Jane. Mary) while insisting they themselves be called by their title (Doctor Robins, Professor Noble, Dean Smith).


06-02-13  12:39am

Reply
44
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Jay G: (jberryl69's Reply)

In the real world (not politically correct) where I live, words are used differently. "Girl" is associated with someone young, free, and independent and woman has a more mature, settled implication. But words do have different meanings in different places and cultures and times. Even politically correct women will be caught using the term "girl" for other women when they're not being careful.

People will always try to control the use of words as the conquering Normans were able to do after 1066 in England when Anglo-Saxon words (fuck, shit, cunt,etc) became "obscene" and Latin or French words (coitus, defecation, vagina) for the same thing were considered socially acceptable.

Whoever has power always tries to control language (and usually fails).


05-31-13  06:16pm

Reply
45
N/A REPLY TO #9 from lk2fireone: (jberryl69's Reply)

Yes, I signed up for the MerArt newsletter earlier this year, after belonging to MetArt many times over the years.

The thumbnails in the newsletter are easy to see. And clicking on a thumbnail brings up a sample gallery of the model's photosets, with nice sized thumbnails.

Clicking on any thumbnail in the sample gallery brings up a 1/3 full-sized photo of the thumbnail. Which is easier to use than the slideshow display for viewing galleries at MetArt.

Even though I am currently a MetArt member, I sometimes use the newsletter thumbnail system to look for new models.


05-25-13  02:41pm

Reply
46
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Drooler: (jberryl69's Reply)

I don't recall asking for it, but I've been getting it. Thanks for the tip. Maybe I'll give it a lookie next time.

05-25-13  09:48am

Reply
47
N/A REPLY TO #4 from Drooler: (jberryl69's Reply)

The funny thing is that I don't even remember when I came up with this poll question. I didn't recognize it as my own until I looked at the poll results and saw my "name" along with it. Doesn't matter to me when it gets posted, though it's kind of funny that a related question was up not long ago.

I guess it's "Thumbnails Month" at the PU polling station. LOL.

Regarding Ik2Fireone's comment, it seems that sites aren't keeping up with monitor resolutions. These days they demand larger thumbs than before. (Remember, anyone, my forum complaint about that?)

Example: ALS Angels. I can step up the size of the page w/cntrl+, but the thumbs look like something out of 1998 when I do.

Getting back to the main point, I think thumbs for visitors is a smart idea. TorridArt does a good job with it, for instance, except, again for the sizes (just as bad as ALS Angels).


05-25-13  09:26am

Reply
48
N/A REPLY TO #25 from Cybertoad: (jberryl69's Reply)



I own a trenchcoat .....whats your point LOLOLOL


05-21-13  09:08am

Reply
49
N/A REPLY TO #21 from Jay G: (jberryl69's Reply)

I love the harem fantasy, but in MY fantasy I'm so wealthy I don't have to worry about money.....only about which woman or women to play with next.

05-21-13  04:19am

Reply
50
N/A REPLY TO #14 from Jay G: (jberryl69's Reply)

The financial truth: in the real world ONE woman can be too expensive.....as the old saying goes, "In my youth I spent my money on liquor and women and the rest I just wasted"

05-20-13  10:06am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 227 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.62 seconds.