Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).


Learn
how you can participate in our weekly raffle for cash prizes!
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : jberryl69 (12)  

Feedback:   All (430)  |   Reviews (6)  |   Comments (9)  |   Replies (415)

Other:   Replies Received (150)  |   Trust Ratings (26)

Replies Received

Replies to your reviews or comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 150 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A REPLY TO #18 from turboshaft: (jberryl69's Reply)

That's an interesting link but I'm not totally sure about what it claims: "If properly conditioned, the PCs enable you to stop ejaculation while continuing to enjoy sex." Okay, no, you don't ejaculate, but you do orgasm? That's one of those things that might freak me out a little, like if I'm feeling something and I've always expected an accompanying action along with it. Seriously, wouldn't most guys think there might be something wrong?

And I would think in terms of your partner(s) there would be an expectation of multiple ejaculations when you say multiple orgasms, not having a less-than-hair trigger. Women love it (unless they really didn't want to have sex) when a guy can do either, but I'm not sure if they're totally concerned that you're having multiple orgasms before you finally take your shot, so to speak. Maybe it's just me, but having sex, even if it eventually only results in just 1 orgasm + 1 ejaculation, still feels pretty damn good.


02-16-13  09:25pm

Reply
27
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

LOL.... That's Okay, I think I got the picture.
I does appreciate da gesture, though.


02-04-13  10:15am

Reply
28
N/A REPLY TO #4 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Titillating stuff, jb.... any more of that you wanna share with us pervs? :-)

02-04-13  09:13am

Reply
29
N/A REPLY TO #16 from messmer: (jberryl69's Reply)

LOL. Don't give it a thought, jb. Just wanted to make sure no one would get the idea that I skew a poll just for the fun of it.

01-30-13  02:29pm

Reply
30
N/A REPLY TO #11 from messmer: (jberryl69's Reply)

Actually the results should be accurate in my case. I voted for regular, just couldn't resist making the remark.

01-29-13  06:08pm

Reply
31
N/A REPLY TO #22 from rearadmiral: (jberryl69's Reply)

"Other"

01-12-13  06:57am

Reply
32
N/A REPLY TO #8 from Cybertoad: (jberryl69's Reply)



I was kinda curious myself as many viewers share conservative and liberal views on porn. Why not firearms. I think it is great you asked for the poll . Be curious how this unfolds.


01-09-13  09:55am

Reply
33
N/A REPLY TO #6 from Khan: (jberryl69's Reply)

But not so off topic that it hadn't been asked before back on 2-Apr-2012.
Do you own a fire-arm?
http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=70755
;-)

BTW, I own several.


01-09-13  09:19am

Reply
34
N/A REPLY TO #11 from RustyJ: (jberryl69's Reply)

I've used the "other main option" as long as I can remember. Netscape Navigator, then Communicator and now Firefox. Want to try Chrome too but really cannot find the motivation at the moment. FF add-ons and plugins are just too cool.

12-30-12  08:55am

Reply
35
N/A REPLY TO #22 from gggfan: (jberryl69's Reply)

... would be my pleasure to guide you into German porn ... lol

12-09-12  10:25am

Reply
36
N/A REPLY TO #20 from gggfan: (jberryl69's Reply)

ahahah, you know me !

Well, I do think that German prodice the best porn. As it's been said, it depends on the type of porn you're looking for or you're into.

German have good vintage movies and very good amateur stuff.

Ragrding GGG, I used to like their productions : their old producions were quite good in the gangbang style. But nowadays they produce boring stuff in my opinion. Fortunately, some other guys picked up this niche of amateur style gangbangs with great success !


12-07-12  12:51pm

Reply
37
N/A REPLY TO #22 from t9chome: (jberryl69's Reply)

Well, the govmint IS the crook! We've let them take our money to spend as they wish, not as we wish, for far too long. Unless you're a lobbyist, of course. What or who makes one a crook anyway? The government. Finally, making it taxable damn sure won't stop it from being criminal, eg. moonshine, home grown tobacco, etc.

11-10-12  10:52am

Reply
38
N/A REPLY TO #28 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

haha, the acronyms do get overwhelming at times. It took me months before I realized that ATM wasn't some sort of "More Money, More Blues" genre. New ones keep popping up, it is quite difficult to keep track of them all.

11-08-12  09:28pm

Reply
39
N/A REPLY TO #26 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

You are very right that the "spit roast" (isn't it strange how often porn adopts food terminology?) requires a considerable amount of skill and finesse to be performed well. I guess my perscriptivist objection is I'd rather it be referred to as that (spit roast) or more specifically, I'd rather scenes with two males and a female that do not include the anal/vaginal penetration simply be called a threesome, or MMF if people like. Maybe it should be more accurately MFM, lol

11-08-12  08:12pm

Reply
40
N/A REPLY TO #10 from Cybertoad: (jberryl69's Reply)


jberryl69 said: Someone is going to make money off the drug, and better the government than the crook.

Umm how will we be able to tell the difference LOLOLOL


11-08-12  06:00pm

Reply
41
N/A REPLY TO #17 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

haha, I hate when that is classified as DP. If some dude says "I penetrated a chick last night", most guys would smack him upside the head if he later explained that he was referring to a blowjob. I guess it is the difference between what is technically true versus what is the culturally accepted definition.

11-06-12  04:08pm

Reply
42
N/A REPLY TO #16 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

Thanks for the clarification about the intent of the original remark - I misinterpreted it as not only incredulous but also somewhat accusatory. Therein lies the occasional failings of communicating strictly through a written medium. Btw, here is a study in the British Journal of Urology International (a peer reviewed journal) that linked masturbation as a means for lowering the chance of prostate cancer. I really should have done a better search the first time. (All I had to do was check in with my favorite science rag, The New Scientist.)

I'm always amazed to hear about people's experiences with X-Rays because the technology was used so liberally that it was silly. My absolute favorite is the absurd X-Ray Shoe Fitting machines. These days your experience would be easy grounds for a lawsuit.

I should note that I assumed you had nothing against masturbation for anyone - I can't imagine any contributing member of this site having such opinions. I do hope that some quality science in the near future will help you with the ED as it has so many others, but I commend you for persevering despite it - so many don't even bother trying.


10-25-12  03:59pm

Reply
43
N/A REPLY TO #13 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

True, "need" might be an overly strong word, but I don't believe it is hugely debated that masturbation (keeping in mind the whole all things in moderation adage) is generally beneficial.

In regards to "no physician I have ever talked to" - again, yes, I doubt you'd ever get something so specific like the recommendation of changing a car's oil every 5k miles, but lack of being informed by a doctor doesn't negate somethings validity as a health recommendation. Frankly, there's a lot that doctors don't get around to recommending. I think it is because they are too busy going to the bank, but who knows? So - does one "need" to masturbate? Probably not. Should one with certain, if not exactly specified, regularity? Probably, yes.

Of course, it has to be recognized how little we (humans) know about our physiology. It has oft been cited (I read it in Mary Roach's Stiff) that a visit to the doctor's office didn't achieve a measured chance of actually improving a patient's health until the 1920s. Thousands of years of health care and before then, you were basically guaranteed to be worse off after visiting a doctor until the 1920s. So, despite all the strength given to doctors' opinions, they've really only been marginally good at this for about 90 years.

So, the whole medical opinion regarding masturbation could change again, perhaps not back to the "it's the work of the devil" era, but maybe in the future humans will be living in some monkish realm of abstinence. Who knows? My point was simply, that there has been some science supporting the claim of masturbation being good for the body, and shouldn't so quickly be dismissed with a sarcastic "Seriously?".


10-25-12  07:50am

Reply
44
N/A REPLY TO #6 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Thanks, JB, for sharing that with the poll. Like the 'ol saying:
"A picture's worth a thousand words" ..... so it is on behalf of the excellent example you've so thoughtfully herewith provided ... It justifies like nothing else I could've added.


10-25-12  07:00am

Reply
45
N/A REPLY TO #11 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

He is right. Seriously.

Men's Health Magazine: Health and Sexual Benefits of Masturbation

I know that isn't the most reputable source, but it was the first one I found after a quick search. I've seen similar stories reported in more reputable publications.


10-25-12  12:49am

Reply
46
N/A REPLY TO #24 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

Ah, so in that example the "worst place to shoot porn" would be: "About my mother's person." lol

10-19-12  01:41pm

Reply
47
N/A REPLY TO #17 from Toadsith: (jberryl69's Reply)

Please refer to Drooler's and my answers.

The sheer fatality rate amongst most of the our suggestions would pretty much guarantee an unsuccessful porn scene. Yay for logical extremes!


10-18-12  12:52pm

Reply
48
N/A REPLY TO #13 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Whatever floats your boat, BigGuy .......
But you ain't gettin' any younger, and inflation ain't slowing down.

Now!!! if you're alluding to, or dancing around the belief that these grade A, prime-plus-select beauties can be yours on sheer wits alone (at our age) then allow me to be the first to let you in on a sweet deal on some marsh-land in New Jersey, destined to be filled in for building rows of top name casinos.


10-16-12  07:27pm

Reply
49
N/A REPLY TO #10 from graymane: (jberryl69's Reply)

Well "sweet-sassafras and sourdough"!!!!
PU's wandering nomad is back with us .... and a welcomed sight he is. jus' can't be a more celebrated moment!

You've jus' gotta tell us all about your exciting adventures while out on the road! :-)

May I address this?
Quote: "Plus I can't remember the last time I "mounted". Wahoo!"

Try my approach: Didn't you pick up on the part where I said "fist-full-of-greenbacks?

Glad'ta'se'ya


10-14-12  05:31pm

Reply
50
N/A REPLY TO #4 from otoh: (jberryl69's Reply)

Good point - although the face is what appeals to me, I guess it's how they use it to salacious effect - so performance is perhaps better. Give me a plain girl with a glint of desire in her eye, over a beautiful one starting into the distance any day! (Of course, this is porn, so the idea is to have both...)

09-03-12  08:54am


*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Shown : 26-50 of 150 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.58 seconds.