Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (218)  

Feedback:   All (2976)  |   Reviews (115)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2624)

Other:   Replies Received (1453)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 2624 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Unwitting yet brilliant -- must be a natural.

06-22-14  05:12am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Somehow it seems that a boycott of a company that makes underwear has more chances of success than a boycott of a porn website with a webmaster of dubious character and/or unpleasant personality.

Guys slip into their briefs, it seems, for qualitatively different reasons than they click "join," even if they know the webmaster is a wretched troll.

And usually disputes with webmasters are more isolated and interpersonal. They don't incite the kind of activism that happens when outsourced textile workers are shut out of the factory after forming a union.

It's probably because there's a lot more at stake.

Well, at least we have our reviews ...


06-21-14  04:51pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Four if we don't count the ones that died and are "buried" on the premises. It's nice how they come right in their own little box.

06-19-14  12:07pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I feel that a review has to be written in prose, but the standard format for pro's and con's here is bullet points. That doesn't necessarily easy, because you have imply analysis based on what you expect people to want to know. Still, the bottom line I find harder to do if I really want to write it well.

If I don't give much of a squat, then there's no big difference. It all comes out like it's from a semi-automatic firearm: bullet, bullet, bullet ...

Lazy reviewers are actually better for lazy readers, anyway.


06-13-14  04:34pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

"Normal Clothes" is a broad category, but of course it is. To me, it's anything the model might be wearing that I might see a girl wearing on the street or at a social gathering, which could be business attire (the boss or the secretary), an evening gown, a summer dress, winter wear, fall fashions, or a pair of cotton shorts and a cut-off T-shirt.

It's a real turn-on to see them getting out of such things. Lingerie's OK, but honestly, it's more of a turn-on in real life.


06-03-14  01:51pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Das Bukkake, that's hilarious.

05-30-14  05:35pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Bukkake requires a collectivist mentality. It is porn that slips and slides the viewer towards Communism. It is its last hope, and it will fail in its mission.

05-30-14  10:24am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always read it as an intentionally vague yet positive sounding phrase. It might appeal to those who think with ... well, not their brains.

It means "not every day," because if they did update every day, they'd say that and it wouldn't matter which organ the potential customer did the cognitive processing with.

A trip to PU or TBP would be a requirement before I'd considering joining.


05-28-14  05:40pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

Thanks for taking the time to give me a load of info about ChromeBooks. I appreciate it.

05-24-14  02:34pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Reply

Oh, sure. And then I'd be getting, "You're kidding me. I've never seen them get their pussy lips done!"

BTW, I noticed recently that one of my favorite models/pornstars had hers done, and it really kind of upset me. I won't say who it is, but, again, wasn't needed!


05-18-14  01:17pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most models don't look better after such surgery; many look worse!

About the only one I can think of who still looks OK after it is Monique Alexander, but she didn't need it. In fact, none of them need it because they're already good-looking enough. It's a risk to their appearance that they shouldn't entertain.


05-18-14  06:20am

Reply
37
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Reply

I wonder how the apps are on the Chromebook, esp. regarding Microsoft Office compatibility. (I hope the world will eventually move on to another standard, and thus really have standards, but I don't see it happening quite yet.)

Compatibility with Office, esp. Word, Excel, and PPT have been my biggest holdback on diving further into the newer portables. Have had a hell of a time with Apple stuff since they no longer play nice with Office (and vice versa).


05-17-14  03:23am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I hate it when I see the thumbnail showing the subject filling the space, but then the actual photo has her dwarfed by a tree or a wall or something like that.

WYSIWYG ("What you see is what you get") is the best policy, besides being an avenue to self-awareness.


05-15-14  01:42pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I wouldn't know what to think. Just seeing it isn't enough to judge.

05-04-14  07:29am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They are minor flaws most of the time in my experience. Some of the ladies have really lovely skin, and I mean in the videos.

Probably the most annoying flaw to me is ass rash. But I don't see that a lot. And when I do see it, it builds character -- in me.


05-01-14  07:32pm

Reply
41
Visit We Are Hairy

We Are Hairy
(1)
Reply of clark kent's Comment

Too bad. I was thinking about rejoining but the price hike kills it. I liked just some of the content last time; would expect the same.

04-26-14  12:48pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Anything but flippers (as for snorkeling, etc.)

I do like it when a fine lady in a swish-swish summer skirt enters the scene in high heels, but the fucking I prefer done as nakedly as possible.


04-26-14  12:25pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Fisting: Some girls love it. Anal: Some girls love that, too.

Makes you wonder why it's always the men who get called perverts. LOL

I suppose that if I were "fistable" in such a way that I might be more favorably inclined. BTW, shouldn't there be a porn flick called "A Fistful for Dollars"?

Just wondering ...


04-20-14  09:00am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I'd be mildly to very disappointed, depending on what I already knew or at least wanted to know, unless the model didn't interest me at all.

04-18-14  04:36am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Guitars, saxophones, and drum kits seem to be the most often used. I don't care for it as it's just as distracting and unnecessary as empty picture frames and (*gasp*) the driven-down-to-the-shale-layer angel wings.

Pianos are different! Got a nice set of Anya (aka Fibby) at the piano and a few other softcore sets of other models tinkling (if not tinkling on) the ivories. Then there's that video of Lexi Bloom doin' it on a piano bench ...


04-17-14  04:18pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

"Sorry, honey, not tonight. I've got an upgrade to install ..."

04-15-14  05:56pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'm interpreting the question to mean "on average," which I think is 2-3, but some last less time than that, and some have gone past the 10-year mark.

04-10-14  12:44pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

I can think of a title for this: "The Day the Wood Stood Still."

04-07-14  03:33pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of roseman's Poll

The tour is one of the steps; reading reviews is another. I take both into account.

I've been misled both ways, so it's a good way to "double your maybe." Tours have been overall less reliable than reviews.


04-06-14  03:55pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Woodruff's Poll

If it's a softcore site then ...?

04-02-14  02:55am


Shown : 26-50 of 2624 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.12 seconds.