Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3010)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2657)

Other:   Replies Received (1460)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 26-50 of 2657 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nary a one, now and forever.

09-18-14  10:42am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of skippy's Reply

Lorena and Marketa (Belonoha) are other good examples. Thanks. Cassidy Raye comes to mind, too.

09-14-14  09:26am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I'd say that if you're no longer fresh then chances are you can't be "too" popular -- unless staleness turns into something sought after.

And as others have said, you can't. I think of Eufrat as an example. She's been in the biz primarily as a softcore model, with a good dose of lez and a smaller one of B/G thrown in, for a long time. I still get a thrill every time I see something new of her -- which is harder to come by these days.

Maybe it's not fair to use Eufrat as an example as she has unique gift in how she interacts with the camera.

So what about Monique Alexander, who has been at it since around age 19? Or Jadra Holly --> Kirsten Price?

If they're "too" popular, then fine by me. Somehow the models/performers have more resilience in the face of fan fickleness than, say, the number one hit song (whatever that might be).


09-13-14  02:21pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

I'd like to be in my coffin during the viewing with a plasma screen affixed to the inside of the lid, continuously looping my favorite scene of Jenna Haze taking it from the back.

Gentle funeral music playing with an occasional "Oh, FUCK!" coming from the crypt.


09-11-14  07:11pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's not so much been "buyer's remorse" as it has been "consumer's resentment."

09-09-14  07:22am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

The face and what sexiness comes from it matters most. I was going over my collection of Lindsay Olsen and was struck once again by how she just seems to grab you with those eyes. Once you have something like that, it's all of the rest.

09-08-14  02:21pm

Reply
32
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Reply

Looks like corporate-style conformity is winning the day in the Met-Art empire.

I used to like the way photos were named at Errotica-Archives (one of the subject feifdoms): an "m" was tacked onto the end if it was "medium" size, and an "l" or and "e" if it was, respectively, "large" or "extra-large."

But now, as so often happens in times imperial, a singular convention has prevailed, so if I want to mix medium- and large-sized pictures in file number order, I can't just chuck out an "m" and put the "l" in its place, now that those attributes have to appear before the file number.

Petty, I know. But only if you're a fan of the content ... and there's plenty of that.


09-06-14  11:02am

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

What do I think? They should.

How do I feel about it? I don't care for it.


09-03-14  07:09pm

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What Pat said. You rarely find sites that have you pay a premium price by the unit--those that have tried have not done so well--and the content is actually much more interesting than a lot of the mainstream movies with their special effects and worn-out story lines.

Some things bear repeating more than others.


09-01-14  07:36pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I stream all the movies I watch. Quite a few years ago, I found that it's available on cable television.

08-30-14  03:31pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

They've made everything else for export markets, so why not this?

08-28-14  06:30pm

Reply
37
Visit WTF Pass

WTF Pass
(0)
Reply of sigmund's Comment

Funny how the site name corresponds: WTF?! I'll pass!

08-27-14  04:36pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It doesn't really matter to me. I never bother memorizing them, so they can be as cryptic as alphabet soup in a wind storm.

08-22-14  06:23pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of graymane's Reply

"Crushing reversal" -- that was funny!

Seems that "To BBW or not to BBW, 'tis not the question."


08-21-14  06:31pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like skinny girls with nice round places here 'n there.

08-20-14  04:50pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

48 is OK with me. Who knows? If it's a BIG problem, it could take awhile. I remember when one of the ATK sites went the way of all pixelized flesh and it took them months to recover.

Besides, if the user is patient, they have a little more of an obligation to behave themselves as well.


08-18-14  06:01pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It puts the fantasy girl into reality. From there, it's a bigger turn-on putting her back into fantasy sometimes.

But it depends. Doesn't it always? Some sites have better BTS stuff than others. And if none of them ever had any, that wouldn't be a problem.


08-14-14  06:11pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

When the now-defunct iBill was a 3rd party biller and they were getting dysfunctional, I got accused of sharing my use-pass more than once. Care to guess which party was actually responsible??

Once I joined a site that suddenly blocked access for two weeks with no explanation, then resumed accepting logins after they'd so very wisely SHRUNK all of the photo sizes.

There have been a few other crappy experiences over the years. As in "crap table," I suppose. It's always a gamble, even when it looks like a sure thing.


08-12-14  03:20pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of skippy's Reply

ROFL, that was well-said.

08-10-14  11:02am

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I've seen sets of over 400 images of what I didn't want, and sets of 25 that I thought were great. It's tempting to say at least 100 (200?) to increase the odds of getting something I'd like, but I wonder if having more really would.

08-10-14  08:21am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When men are "topless," they are usually either relaxing on a warm day or they are doing some kind of sweaty manual labor that isn't particularly unsafe with no shirt on.

I could say that women should have the same rights as men to "go topless," but I can't imagine women walking around on city streets or in shopping areas with their titties swinging just because they have the right to any more than men would.

Besides, local governments and private businesses have their laws and policies, respectively, to prohibit inappropriate dress or lack of it.

Regarding public beaches, perhaps a referendum would be the best way to gauge public opinion on the mater. Not that everyone would be happy with the results, whatever they might be.


08-09-14  09:39pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

I'm busy and impatient, so I usually go for the slam-bang by fast-fowarding, yet there are times when I become intrigued by the "plot development" and check it out. Sometimes it really does make the sex part hotter. So it's "quite important," even if it's not very often.

08-07-14  06:06pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Both PU and TBP reviews. Sometimes one is more up-to-date than the other, and often each will give info that the other won't have.

In the Olympics, there are multiple judges, so why not for "indoor sports," as it is sometimes called?


08-05-14  06:47pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Fires spread very quickly. Fractions of seconds count. People first ... and probably last.

08-01-14  10:14am

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I made the acquaintance of a hairy-legged women once long ago (like 37 years ago). She lived with another woman in town. Back in those days, it wasn't so easy for girls like them.

07-25-14  07:08pm


Shown : 26-50 of 2657 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.94 seconds.