Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Schirm (3)  

Feedback:   All (10)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (6)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

Replies Given

Your replies to other users's reviews and comments.
Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Type Site Feedback / Review Date
Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Due to your initial business decision to advsertise the membership fee in us dollar but actually try to charge me another price in euro instead, you lost me as a customer at that very point when I aborted the join process.

That was neither honest nor correct.

What you call "regional pricing" is one of the most disgusting business concepts among adult content providers on the web. There is no excuse for trying to charge me a higher member fee on a global market based on geographical location.

This, together with your insulting attitude and incorrect assumptions shown in your replies makes it clear you should be avoided.

08-22-14  10:40am

Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Its a clear case of discrimination: you clearly admit to charge different prices for the same membership, based on location, and your attempt of denial doesnt help your credibility (or whats left of it, thanks to Pat362s contribution on your past).

Regional pricing for porn sites are among the worst exuses ever for overcharging customers.

Based on your business decisions and replies posted here I definitely stay away for your sites.

There is no excuse to regional pricing!

08-17-14  04:36am

Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Dear Freax Media Group,

I dont find it funny at all. Contrary to what your reply claims, I DID pay close attentioin and THEREFORE aborted, never joined and wrote this comment about your scam.

Advertising the price 29 usd but actually charging 48 usd (= 29 euro) do seem like a scam. especially since you admit there was no information about "regional pricing".

I refuse to be discrimated by your "regional pricing" policy. There is no reason for me to pay anything but a correct currency conversion of the advertised 29 usd.

07-20-14  12:14pm

Visit VideoBox

Reply of pat362's Review

Hi Pat

I noticed you put a remark about video quality in the cons list. Would you mind elaborate on this a bit?

Taking aside newer hd scenes, would you say that files suffer from too hard compression, low bitrates etc? What filesize would a typical 30 min full frame (4:3) scene be, roughly?

I figure the main alternative would be Videosz, where I found the quality to quite satisfactory overall. Is Videobox on the same level?

03-23-14  02:42am

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
Reply of pat362's Reply

Dear Pat

You are so right and obviously we dont agree.

Yes you are wrong - rehash a video and call it something else to inflate a site does not score quality points with me.

And no, I dont have to give you such comparison sites for a very simple reason: I review DDF that for what I see and I dont know that many other sites yet. Unlike you, I found their search system lacking and not that helpful when I used it.

As for content on the their other sites - no I didnt like those much.

Regarding their platform being outdated: may I please refer you to the comment/question I made which Ace replied to state my point.

To be frank, pat, I really dont understand your need to raise the score for DDF, a site that in some sense tries to cheat its customers by unsecure billers and a customer support that sucks when their customers ask for help to cancel. Just because you never had a problem does not entitle you to be forgiving when it happens to others.

And finally Pat, please show better respect for those opinions that differs from yours. Im not here to make you happy or promote DDF, and I am entitled to my own opinions just as you are.

DDF is in my opinion really not a good site and you seem to overrate it. Thank you for finding some of my points valid.

03-22-14  10:43pm

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
Reply of pat362's Reply

Well.... 60 is still a recommendation score.

And I think I was pretty clear about the downsides: rehashing a scene to fit a site and then not easy to find the original is for me a downside.

And even if some scenes are really good, the total does not really represent quality to me. Lots of rehashes and solo scenes dont justify the price.

But the decisive point is of course the cancellation problems I faced. I really mean it: there is NO excuse to ask for credit card details on an non-encrypted connection.

In my opinion it reflects back on DFF since I cannot choose billing company and the one selected for me was not secure.

DFF support failed this time and it of course reflects on my review

Porn sites is not just about content - its about customer care. The sites lacks and is outdated in my opinion.

Since pat has not shared my experience I see no problem for him to be more postive. But please respect that my opinion is sincere.

It should be up to the customer to choose biller - when a site like DDF makes that choice for me then there is simply no excuse.

Overrated is my experience, if pat is happy with what he gets then we are both helping the site the best we can.

03-22-14  12:19pm

Shown : 1-6 of 6  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.48 seconds.