Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Schirm (3)  

Feedback:   All (10)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (6)

Other:   Replies Received (9)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-10 of 10  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Due to your initial business decision to advsertise the membership fee in us dollar but actually try to charge me another price in euro instead, you lost me as a customer at that very point when I aborted the join process.

That was neither honest nor correct.

What you call "regional pricing" is one of the most disgusting business concepts among adult content providers on the web. There is no excuse for trying to charge me a higher member fee on a global market based on geographical location.

This, together with your insulting attitude and incorrect assumptions shown in your replies makes it clear you should be avoided.

08-22-14  10:40am

Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Its a clear case of discrimination: you clearly admit to charge different prices for the same membership, based on location, and your attempt of denial doesnt help your credibility (or whats left of it, thanks to Pat362s contribution on your past).

Regional pricing for porn sites are among the worst exuses ever for overcharging customers.

Based on your business decisions and replies posted here I definitely stay away for your sites.

There is no excuse to regional pricing!

08-17-14  04:36am

Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator
Reply of Freax Media Gro's Reply

Dear Freax Media Group,

I dont find it funny at all. Contrary to what your reply claims, I DID pay close attentioin and THEREFORE aborted, never joined and wrote this comment about your scam.

Advertising the price 29 usd but actually charging 48 usd (= 29 euro) do seem like a scam. especially since you admit there was no information about "regional pricing".

I refuse to be discrimated by your "regional pricing" policy. There is no reason for me to pay anything but a correct currency conversion of the advertised 29 usd.

07-20-14  12:14pm

Visit Anal Educator

Anal Educator

Pricing scam?

I had decided to join this site, but the signup process made me feel very hesitant about this site and am now hesitant to join.

On the first page where you enter your email and username, the price is clearly stated: 30 days recurring - Charge: 29.90 USD

Clicking the checkoutbutton takes you to the next page. Here the charge is instead stated to be 29.90 Euro.

When selecting US currrency, the actual charge has increased to 38.49 USD!

This is obviously not the same amount of money as the 29.90 USD clearly advertised!

A site trying to scam its customers during signup is a clear warning sign for me!

07-18-14  12:54am

Replies (6)
Visit VideoBox

Reply of pat362's Review

Hi Pat

I noticed you put a remark about video quality in the cons list. Would you mind elaborate on this a bit?

Taking aside newer hd scenes, would you say that files suffer from too hard compression, low bitrates etc? What filesize would a typical 30 min full frame (4:3) scene be, roughly?

I figure the main alternative would be Videosz, where I found the quality to quite satisfactory overall. Is Videobox on the same level?

03-23-14  02:42am

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
Reply of pat362's Reply

Dear Pat

You are so right and obviously we dont agree.

Yes you are wrong - rehash a video and call it something else to inflate a site does not score quality points with me.

And no, I dont have to give you such comparison sites for a very simple reason: I review DDF that for what I see and I dont know that many other sites yet. Unlike you, I found their search system lacking and not that helpful when I used it.

As for content on the their other sites - no I didnt like those much.

Regarding their platform being outdated: may I please refer you to the comment/question I made which Ace replied to state my point.

To be frank, pat, I really dont understand your need to raise the score for DDF, a site that in some sense tries to cheat its customers by unsecure billers and a customer support that sucks when their customers ask for help to cancel. Just because you never had a problem does not entitle you to be forgiving when it happens to others.

And finally Pat, please show better respect for those opinions that differs from yours. Im not here to make you happy or promote DDF, and I am entitled to my own opinions just as you are.

DDF is in my opinion really not a good site and you seem to overrate it. Thank you for finding some of my points valid.

03-22-14  10:43pm

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network
Reply of pat362's Reply

Well.... 60 is still a recommendation score.

And I think I was pretty clear about the downsides: rehashing a scene to fit a site and then not easy to find the original is for me a downside.

And even if some scenes are really good, the total does not really represent quality to me. Lots of rehashes and solo scenes dont justify the price.

But the decisive point is of course the cancellation problems I faced. I really mean it: there is NO excuse to ask for credit card details on an non-encrypted connection.

In my opinion it reflects back on DFF since I cannot choose billing company and the one selected for me was not secure.

DFF support failed this time and it of course reflects on my review

Porn sites is not just about content - its about customer care. The sites lacks and is outdated in my opinion.

Since pat has not shared my experience I see no problem for him to be more postive. But please respect that my opinion is sincere.

It should be up to the customer to choose biller - when a site like DDF makes that choice for me then there is simply no excuse.

Overrated is my experience, if pat is happy with what he gets then we are both helping the site the best we can.

03-22-14  12:19pm

Visit DDF Network

DDF Network

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Very pleasant content aestethics. The way movies look, performers act and interact stands out in my opinion.

Much to enjoy in the Hands-on-Hardcore and House-of-Taboo sites.

An older scene with Angelina Crow

Huge files with excellent quality
Cons: The membership cancellation process: There is no excuse for requesting credit card details on a non-encrypted connection to cancel membership.

Had a bad experience with their customer support who initally ignored my cancellation request and did not respond despite several emails.

Only-blowjobs site: it takes full-length scenes, edits away all but the blowjob action and justifies itself by the resulting rehash. And definitively no easy way to find the original scene.

Too much solo content scenes on the network, in relation to usual hardcore scenes. Search a star and find mostly solo scenes is not that rewarding to me.

Outdated platform and search functions.
Bottom Line: Im sure that once upon a time this network was or could have been among the very best, but not so anymore.

Some of the scenes are just wonderful and easy all-time-favourites, but the site itself is not. I have no regrets for cancelling, and based on my cancellation experience no wish to join again.

03-21-14  03:33pm

Replies (6)
Visit DDF Network

DDF Network

DDF - how to best organize downloaded content ?

Since DDF seems to differ slightly from what I found to be very easy with other sites, I thought I'd post a question here on how other users/members do.

What I basically prefer to do is this: find a scene, download it together with a "cover" image, and store them together in a separate folder. This way its easy for me to browse through scenes by the cover images using a mediastreamer connected to a tv.

On first impression DDF seems to be exemplary: an excellent "cover" image showing not only the scene name and the performers but also the site name.

But when adding videofiles into a download manager, and downloading each "cover" images separately, its neither easy nor exemplary to me: the image found on the download page has no file name which relates to the downloaded scene, and can differ slightly from those "cover" images presented when browsing for scenes. The image found on the download page is both smaller in size and can be less informative.

So far I found it to be less than enjoyable manually renaming files/sorting out which image goes with which videofile.

Am I missing something? How do other users do when organizing their downloaded content from DDF network sites?

02-16-14  04:17am

Replies (5)
Visit VideosZ


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Huge library of older dvds from both wellknown and lesser known studios.
- Very good indexing of acresses & their aliases. Have found many scenes with my favorite actresses previously unknown to me.
- Stable site and downloads. Using a download manager works just fine.
- Video quality of standard definition scenes/files is surprisingly good given the compression. Even older avi-files looks ok when downloaded, upscaled and zoomed to widescreen (using a better quality media streamer on a full hd-tv).
- Discounted price through TBP gives good value.
Cons: - Legal terms: seems like you are billed for 1 month at a time while quitting membership is more or less immediate. This is biased against the customer who might not get the full 30 days he/she paid for.
- Not easy find what you are looking for. The content categories are not very detailed and search options are limited. No information on who directed a movie/scene. Most "free" tube sites provides better indexing of their material.
- Personally I would prefer being greeted by the choosen username instead of my real name on the site.
Bottom Line: This is the first pay site I ever signed up for, so I have not much to compare with.
The site offers a huge archive of older scenes and I have had no technical problems with it. Basically I would rate it above "Average" and below "Excellent". The biased legal terms and limited scene detail information limits the use and therefore I reward this site with a score of 80. Its a good site really, but far from being even close to "Excellent".

12-28-13  12:22am

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-10 of 10  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.59 seconds.