| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with otoh. If there not trying to trick me and there's enough content sure. I'd be sure to mention the lack of updates in my review.
Honesty is my only requirement.
|
04-19-13 01:20pm
|
Reply
27
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I agree I'm more turned on by real women. It makes me crazy when a site has models that all look like "Barbie."
|
04-17-13 11:11am
|
Reply
28
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I used to only join sites with member reviews. However over the last few month I've realized someone has to be the 1st so I've become more comfortable jumping in (if the preview section is good enough).
I've have once joined a site that did not have an adequate preview and regretted it.
|
04-17-13 11:09am
|
Reply
29
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
Buckhead's Review
Nice review and welcome to PU. I'm also a fan of NA and try to rejoin every year or so to check out the latest. I agree they are formulaic and vanilla - but sometimes that's just right.
|
04-17-13 05:40am
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Perfectly said the hottest porn is always the stuff that gets the model off (the less acting the better). Fisting doesn't seem to be enjoyable. Amazing what the human body is capable of; but not pleasurable.
I too went with "not my cup of tea" (who I am I to judge what turns you on) - but like you not for me.
|
04-13-13 08:30am
|
Reply
31
|
Naughty America
(11)
|
Reply of
hodayathink's Comment
Thanks hodaythink. I like checking out NA every few month, maybe I'll grab this while I can!
|
04-12-13 02:27pm
|
Reply
32
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I join sites for video not pix so for me I need to see that the quality (not necessarily resolution) will be there.
|
04-11-13 02:38pm
|
Reply
33
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Nah those damn 'bot may take my job; but damn it no body beat me at schnookering!
|
04-10-13 04:40pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I certainly take price into account. If two sites have fill a similar niche, with similar quality doesn't the less expensive site deserve to have that noted and their score bumped? Conversely if a site is gauging shouldn't that also be noted?
To me I think it's all part of writing a fair review. Fair to the webmaster and to the potential customers.
|
04-10-13 04:39pm
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
There's such a variety in reviews that it's hard to answer; like RustyJ said, some do it well others not so much. I think another site that does a good job with previews in manojob and naughtyamerica.com
I'm not looking for them to give away the farm - just want to know if what you have is what I want
|
04-06-13 02:39pm
|
Reply
36
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
What's wrong with Zombaio? I've never had a problem with them, but I think this is the only site I've ever used them with.
|
04-05-13 01:38pm
|
Reply
37
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Poll
I leave my asleep rebooting once a week.
|
04-03-13 04:11pm
|
Reply
38
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I used a manager years ago in the dial-up days but haven't thought too once broadband and modern browsers took hold.
What are the best ones for a mac, maybe I should look again?
|
04-02-13 05:09pm
|
Reply
39
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
That's the right attitude and mine too. Never be afraid to try something. How's that for philosophy?
|
04-02-13 05:06pm
|
Reply
40
|
LeLu Love
(1)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
How's this for an easy answer - on the newer videos there is no watermark.
I looked back over 800 videos and only found watermarks on her blog content - not the member videos. That took me to March 2011. When I look at the oldest content I can see a watermark but I found it unobtrusive, it's a light pink (almost white) watermark in the corner. (That video was dated Feb 14 2011)
I hope that fully answers the question. I have to confess I really like Lelu and highly recommend her site. I think any solo content girl that updates everyday and gives her fans personal attention is deserving of all the success in the world.
If you decide to join please do a review, I ranked it at 100 which I know is awfully high, but like I said in my review; when you accomplish what you set out to do, and fulfill your marketing, what else could we customers want?
|
04-01-13 01:25pm
|
Reply
41
|
Cuckold My Husband
(1)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I hate being so negative on a site, but there was just nothing good about this one. :(
|
04-01-13 08:16am
|
Reply
42
|
VNA Girls
(1)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
VNA itself focuses more on a cam network, and a good number of girls include anal in their shows.
That said- the individual sites also include anal (most of them anyway). If this is what you're looking for, you should check out filthycuteonline.com (Shanda Fay). She has a lot of content and there's plenty of anal.
|
03-30-13 04:56am
|
Reply
43
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
Excellent points. Like I said in my opening remarks. I surprised they do this. I don't think I'm that savvy of a customer (lord knows I've maid plenty of mistakes in my time). It seems to me they'll lose more in bad reputation then they'll ever gain with these practices.
|
03-29-13 08:47am
|
Reply
44
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
I guess my ignorance is showing. See that Bangbros is a big and long lasting company I thought their long tenure meant integrity.
As you're comments point out - I seem to be mistaken.
Thanks for your help and thoughts.
|
03-29-13 08:45am
|
Reply
45
|
Ass Parade
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
that's even stranger. the exact url I was directed to is: http://www.assparade.com/t7/?prg=pps&...&cmp=warningpage
I thought it was rather strange that access from the main site had different behavior then the direct url.
Do you see the same thing when you go to the above url?
|
03-29-13 07:10am
|
Reply
46
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Oh, cool. I always get worried when I see "euro models". Thanks for replying!
|
03-29-13 04:28am
|
Reply
47
|
House Of Taboo
(2)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Thanks Pat for mentioning their are some British Models. I myself don't go for porn I can't understand so English speakers is important to me. Glad to know some of that is available here.
|
03-28-13 07:20am
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Cable connection for me. I worry about US's future competitiveness with our increasing lag in broadband competitiveness.
|
03-28-13 07:18am
|
Reply
49
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I think Drooler says it best. Between the vague definitions of what will be virtual sex the fact that nothing replaces the real thing, I wonder if we'll ever be there.
To my the relevant movie reference comes from a 90s Sly Stallone film (I think it was Demolition Man), in the movie he has virtual sex with a future woman, then they have non-virtual sex and of course there's no comparison.
|
03-28-13 05:09am
|
Reply
50
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Not to dodge the question but - sexy girls are sexy. If she's standing next to a car is she more or less sexy?
To me it doesn't excite me more if she's next to a gun, but the gun is also not the focus of my attention. ;)
|
03-25-13 10:04am
|
