| Type |
Site |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Breeder Fuckers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Hmmm.... that's not what I see when I click the link.
I wonder if they've got it appearing differently for UK users?
Thanks for your help though.
|
01-24-14 03:49pm
|
Reply
52
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rather unlikely - even with a big discount it just doesn't seem worth it when I can join for a month and then rejoin in a few months more cheaply.
I know that's probably a but unfair on the site, but hey I have only so much money available for porn and I have to get the best value I can.
It isn't my fault the model they use for running their sites means the customer gets better value with shorter memberships.
|
09-10-13 05:22am
|
Reply
53
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No and no plans to get one. Tattoos are becoming so ubiquitous in the UK that frankly before long the rebels will be the ones with no tattoos!
I can find them kind of sexy on men, but I know if I got one I would end up changing my mind about the design later, and I also think they can look bad when you get older and your skin changes.
I'm afraid I'm really old-fashioned and just think tattoos look wrong on women. I know that's totally sexist and out of date but it's just how I feel. Of course I don't find women sexy but I can appreciate beauty in a woman and I've yet to see a woman I felt a tattoo enhanced the beauty of. To me even the smallest, best-done and most tasteful tattoos look wrong, because to me tattoos are just not feminine things.
|
09-09-13 02:25am
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Happy to use an assigned one and then just use the "remember me" option. I rarely stay a member more than a month at a time anyway, so I'd never remember one I made up any better unless I compromised security further by using one I use on another site.
|
09-07-13 03:41pm
|
Reply
55
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I tend not to follow individual models that closely - the type of model who is a known "porn star" rarely appeals to me as they are usually in very mainstream, glitzy porn.
I prefer more "real", down-and-dirty porn and in that you tend to get a first name if you get one at all!
The name does vary across sites, so I tend to use the first name I know they by and then put their other name(s) in the file name.
|
09-03-13 07:56am
|
Reply
56
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Roberto281's Reply
Good point! I was so mad with them I wasn't thinking! Maybe they could put a warning notice on their TBP page?
|
09-02-13 09:22pm
|
Reply
57
|
Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Wow that's awful. I genuinely think this site should be removed from PU and TBP until they quit this. It's more than just cross-selling.
I think people should boycott this site until it quits this and pledges never to do it, or anything similar, again.
Anyone who is a current member should leave and tell them the reason why.
|
09-02-13 02:52pm
|
Reply
58
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yep - compared to what you used to have to pay for a single DVD (or videotape for those old enough to recall!) I reckon most sites give you a lot more than that.
|
08-29-13 05:02pm
|
Reply
59
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't watch it as I don't find Japanese porn to my taste, but I've seen samples of it and it renders the porn completely pointless and unwatchable in my opinion.
I have no clue why anyone would spend good money on censored porn - it's a oxymoron!
So I had to pick "I don't watch Japanese content" and I admit I wouldn't even if it was uncensored - but if I did want to see it, I'd have to pick "absolutely hate it".
|
08-23-13 02:36am
|
Reply
60
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes. Having had bank fraud on my account twice, both times via internet, I am super-careful. If it's not a name I've heard of and trust, I will not join the site no matter how hot it looks.
I trust Epoch, CCBill and Verotel. Any others I'd have to check on here.
Sites that do their own billing - forget it!
|
08-19-13 09:15am
|
Reply
61
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think it's about 2.5 years old. It's a laptop and probably coming towards the end of its life but I love it - I was a bargain and has served me well.
I am also reluctant to get a new one as my current one came with Windows 7, which I am very happy with, and I don't like the sound of Windows 8 at all.
|
08-17-13 03:06am
|
Reply
62
|
Young Straight Boys
(0)
|
Reply of
SFguy's Comment
Hey there my fellow gay PU-er! Great to see you back. Not a site I'd heard of so your comment is useful - I might have tried it but streaming-only and poor selection makes it a no-no, so you've saved me some dough! Thanks.
|
08-14-13 04:46pm
|
Reply
63
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Other - I don't think any of those options will occur.
Pictures still seem to be going strong and there is still a market for them - so I can't see what would change that in ten years. Video has been around long enough to kill pictures if it was going to - there is clearly still demand for pics in the face of video so I can see nothing that would change that.
I agree porn does seem to have gotten progressively more brutal, but not all porn. I also don't see how it could go much further without being illegal, so I think we've seen as brutal as we're going to get.
Less brutal to attract women? There is already porn aimed at women, and porn not especially aimed at women, which is less brutal. Brutal porn is really a genre of porn, not porn itself.
Every night on prime time TV? I don't think so - attitudes to porn may be a little more liberal now but not that liberal - and the easy availability of porn on the internet would make it largely irrelevant anyway. Porn doesn't sppeal to enough people who are willing admit it to get the ratings on prime time TV.
|
08-13-13 04:12pm
|
Reply
64
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Also I would say that porn producers sometimes forget that porn is a fantasy. If you do too much "behind the scenes" stuff, you're spoiling the fantasy.
Given the limitations of porn in terms of production values and especially the acting abiities of the models, it can sometimes be hard enough to suspend disbelief when watching porn without them showing you all the behind the scenes stuff too!
|
08-11-13 05:38am
|
Reply
65
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I put "other" as it depends - if it shows them fooling around naked it can be kind of hot, but "bloopers" and just dreary shots of them setting up isn't sexy, and sexy is the whole point of porn for me.
|
08-11-13 04:06am
|
Reply
66
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Depends on the site really... some of the smaller sites really are one-man operations so you can't expect quite such a fast response.
I put 48 hours, though I'd hope it would be faster.
It shouldn't take it as long as a week because a site shouldn't have so many problems that it has lots of complaint e-mails to deal with.
|
08-09-13 01:32pm
|
Reply
67
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Heh heh oh Greymane you are such a sweet guy! I was only teasing - I don't mind at all! You phrase your questions however you like, I just specify what I mean when I vote is all.
The vast majority of users of this site are heterosexual males, I know that.
I don't go in for all this over-sensitivity and political correctness. I know when someone is trying to deliberately exclude or offend me and you could never do that!
|
08-07-13 09:23am
|
Reply
68
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Well I'd be ecstatic, but only if they had been worn so I had to choose "accept only if worn".
Otherwise if it's a new pair, they weren't really the porn star's in any meaningful sense, were they?
Incidentally if a porn star I was fond of was wearing panties I'd probably be put off him! But I chose to read "panties" as "jocks"!
|
08-07-13 02:41am
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I put very important, because I like fantasy scenes and for there to be a build-up before the sex.
|
08-05-13 02:50am
|
Reply
70
|
N/A
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Reply
I expect it'll keep growing if you keep joining that many porn sites!
|
08-01-13 01:18pm
|
Reply
71
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
Just one at the moment, but plan to join a couple more soon and get writing some reviews which I've neglected for too long!
|
08-01-13 01:15pm
|
Reply
72
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I love it, but like was the strongest option I could pick!
I have a slight fetish for condoms and I wish they'd show the guy putting them on, which they almost never do. You see the cock uncovered before and after, and most porn gives you the "money shot" - cumming inside the person being fucked is rare in porn - so the condom is removed for that too.
Even without that fetish though I've never understood why straight guys object to this and why condoms are virtually never seen in straight porn. The focus is supposed to be on the woman, no? Why would it bother you to see the penis a little covered up?
Ultimately it's good to know the models are protected too.
|
07-30-13 12:18am
|
Reply
73
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes always - my browser is set to update itself automatically anyway, and I am sure Windows Media Player does as part of Windows updates too.
|
07-26-13 02:07am
|
Reply
74
|
Purzel Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
HATE streaming-only more than anything else!
Why pay for that when for the same money other sites let you keep the stuff?
Streaming-only sites are like a store that charges you the same to rent a DVD as to buy it!
|
07-23-13 09:09am
|
Reply
75
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
I assume squirting doesn't refer to the kind of squirting guys do that I love in the context of this poll!
I don't mind a little watersports occasionally for variety, though it's not a huge thing for me - so I picked "watersports only".
|
07-22-13 10:31am
|
