Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (218)  

Feedback:   All (2930)  |   Reviews (115)  |   Comments (236)  |   Replies (2579)

Other:   Replies Received (1446)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 2930 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Once. And that was all I needed to know! Belly-down flat, baby! YEAH!

02-03-14  04:21pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Dimensions usually do it for me, but as JayG pointed out, only seeing is believing. 1.5 GB of "hi-def" dumb camera work, dim lighting, and dodgy editing will diss the damn thing pretty quick.

02-01-14  03:26am

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Days ... weeks ... sometimes months ...

02-01-14  03:22am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'm more of a World Series man myself ...

01-25-14  06:28pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

2 cents here, 2 cents there. After a while, it adds up to a lot of foul-smelling wind.

01-18-14  10:55am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think the good ones do act. With them, there's more to it than just striking poses. It's a mistake to confuse the medium with the intent of the photographer and/or model. And going to the dictionary is for people who aren't sure if they know what the word means but somehow presume that lexicographers had anticipated my poll question.

You can tell the difference between just posing and creating a mood that goes into a narrative framework. The same goes for video.


01-18-14  10:50am

Reply
32
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I always look at face first, but I look for ass. Should the ass appear first (rare), then I'd look for face.

01-13-14  05:57pm

Reply
33
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Ditto the Capn ...

01-10-14  08:06am

Reply
34
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Some may want to, some may simply not care, and some don't. I remember Susana Spears being on a site with a pseudonym for about week, after which she was "renamed" Susana Spears. That's a model who has a career.

What I don't believe is the blanket statement that answers "yes" to the question, even for a single site. It's too general to be true.


01-07-14  03:39pm

Reply
35
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I once rejoined a site that had closed its access but not its subscription sales.

Once joined a site that shut down for two weeks with no forewarning or explanation and came back on for the final week of my (final) subscription. (They'd spent those two weeks reducing the quality of their content.)

I once got kicked off a site for my access having been sharing by someone apparently working at the billing company, which screwed over the sites, too.

I've rejoined sites that defined "update" simply as "change the dates." I gave 'em hell at PU.

And I've seen content updates stop permanently in the middle of a subscription at a variety of sites over the years.

One thing I've learned is not to say, "I've seen it all." Another is to stop and unearth the unexamined assumptions I'm making when I'm considering a subscription.


01-05-14  12:15am

Reply
36
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's similar content ... yet there is a lot of variety ... yet it's about pretty much the same thing ... and that's OK ...

01-02-14  06:05pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

TV in the US is a huge ripoff if you pay for it because you're just paying them to shove idiotic ads at you between programs that are mostly of a juvenile mentality. There are a few good things here and there, just as a desert might have an oasis every few hundred km or so.

Might as well have your intelligence bypassed as you are about to watch something that really interests you.


12-31-13  03:00pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

My feelings range from "oh, no-o-o!" to "tough beans" on this one. To haven't had collected is to have never seen, so it's based on whether you think you missed something good or not.

It's the one good thing about sites that carry earlier material. TeenModels, for example, has had quite a few sets that used to be on SuperGlam years ago with improvements in size if not in the watermark.

When things like that happen, you never really know what has disappeared for good.

I'd love to see a revival of material that showed up on a French language site called TopMiss. It had a lot of exclusive stuff of many of the "A-list" European models such as Marketa Belonoha and Bambi.

Also would love seeing a revival of Linda O'Neil's old site, updated to current standards. But maybe that one actually has gone for good.


12-27-13  03:31am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The idea of "Oogie for Xmas" has somehow never lost its appeal.

12-23-13  07:31am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"..more intuitive design and layout." Talk about an edge!

12-19-13  12:56pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wonder if there's a genetic difference between those who say they like it and those who don't. I sure can't understand the appeal of pee as something sexual ...

(Returns to chair) Sure, it's nice, but just for relief.


12-15-13  06:04am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What are the chances?

Zee-ro.


12-13-13  03:36pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I haven't had any "Oh, hey! How 'ya doin'?" moments with the company info, but it's good to have it available.

12-05-13  12:26pm

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Outside. Shower optional.

12-03-13  04:44pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Depending on the drug, it could actually enhance production I suppose. The only girl I've seen who I think was out of it was Chastity Lynn. I do hope she doesn't ruin herself and her fine charms with substance abuse.

11-29-13  10:00am

Reply
46
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

I don't know how to break the shocking news to you, but not everyone likes what you like. I hope that's not a big problem for you. You're going to run into that sometimes, you know.

There's no need for you to tell the world that you're petty and intolerant over the fact that your tastes and the tastes of others might be at variance once in a while.


11-24-13  03:44pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I can do without the toy play. You know, sucking on it, licking it, inserting it here, pulling it out, inserting it THERE ...

Might be interesting to see how the results turn out now!


11-23-13  05:56pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of rearadmiral's Poll

I hoard; therefore, I collect.

I have fav's, and I've had fav's. After a while, they need a little stashing away. Rediscovering them (dehoarding them, if you like) is part of the fun.


11-21-13  04:01pm

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Ditto Jay G

11-17-13  02:12pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The only problem I have with that scenario is the timing if there's another site being offered that hasn't been brought up before the purchase process begins. I won't make a snap decision to join GenericRoundTheWorldGirls or whatever sight unseen.

When the mystery site does appear as a riding offer mid-purchase, I consider it a question of who the stupid one is going to be -- me (if I sign up) or them (for waiting too late to properly advertise the site).

And then I go ahead and sign up.

(Just kidding.)


11-15-13  05:20pm


Shown : 26-50 of 2930 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.38 seconds.