Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3080)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (241)  |   Replies (2723)

Other:   Replies Received (1471)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 3080 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Every new thread is new for a much shorter time than it is old -- or dead, as the question goes. It's more consistent to pick up the same topic on an existing thread.

Sure, it takes work to find that old/dead/resting-in-peace thread, but I think it's worth the effort. Once revived, the "zombie" thread will once again raise its withering head on the home page.

So just mix equal parts golden rum, white rum, dark rum, apricot brandy, pineapple juice, lime juice and 1/2 part 150-proof rum, take a sip, and start searching.


07-30-15  01:02pm

Reply
2
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most of the interview videos I've seen with the cameraman (I suppose) talking have been pretty lame in terms of discussion. Interviewing is an art that takes time to be good at. A good interviewer of the models can bring out the appealing parts of their personalities and their intelligence as well. What we have instead, usually, is a guy with a list of questions that he follows from start to finish, with nothing done extemporaneously.

The only interviews I've enjoyed watching are the ones with models that have strong or playful personalities and who talk the interviewer into a corner that he's too incompetent to talk his way out of.


07-26-15  03:28am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Honestly, I have no idea.

07-22-15  02:24pm

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Rarely since some sites use the "suggestion box that is open on the bottom, underneath of which is a wastepaper basket" approach to soliciting feedback. I can think of one that has the photo set pre-rated 100% before it is even posted. What a load of horseshit that is.

On the other hand, I've done a lot of ratings and feedback of things at the ATK sites. They've been honest.

And most of the time, I just figure that a site is going to do things the same way regardless of the feedback they get, so why bother? That's what experience has taught me.


07-18-15  11:52am

Reply
5
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

You'll find me on the Capn's ship.

07-15-15  12:16pm

Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only the ones I was born with

07-13-15  11:13pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Depends on the view ...

07-11-15  11:07am

Reply
8
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

You could either walk the 10 miles back to town, or you could drive. It's kinda like that.

07-07-15  02:26pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I'd rather see everything flesh-to-flesh, but since the fucking is being done by others, they get to choose and that's fine with me.

07-04-15  04:59am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

A good search function is like the transporter room in Star Trek. It will get you there a lot faster than navigating through the wild open spaces, of which there are often many.

06-30-15  04:04pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

Skippy said it well, and I agree with Monahan about the "whole arm or leg or neck" problem. Monique Alexander, for example, has clearly overdone it. I still think she's hot, but I've had to take the bad with the good.

And maybe the girls thinking that they are their own canvas is where the whole problem got its start.


06-27-15  01:17am

Reply
12
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Breast implants are one of the hazards of being a porn fan. You see so many beautiful girls with natural charms that go to ruin. I'm telling you: It's hard to take every time it happens.

06-25-15  08:08pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Diversity (non-whiteness, in other words) in porn is treated as "special," whether the performer is Asian, black, Latina, or whatever floats your boat "correctly." Production companies point out that so and so is in one of those groups. Whether this compensates for the inequality of representation is up to you.

One thing that still goes on is stereotyping, such as the Latina maid (Veronica Rodriguez and Alexa Tomas, for example) and the English-challenged Asian girl with "Love you long time" and shit like that.

Of course, this is only about the women. There are more black studs than there used to be, but aside from the "interracial" aspect being made into a selling point, they are pretty much there for kinetic purposes, as are the white guys.


06-19-15  04:59am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

The majority vote came in: solo.

06-01-15  03:38pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I agree with the two PUer's above. At first I thought that it depends on the shoot, but that would complicate the question unnecessarily.

When I want to revive an old shoot, I don't want to sign up (pay) and then look for what's not there.

Accident deletion is just one reason. Hard drive failure is another. And yet another is upgrading -- getting that higher quality scene now that your hardware is asking for it.


05-26-15  03:11pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

This is the quantitative aspect -- not as important as the qualitative one.

04-30-15  03:49pm

Reply
17
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

pat362 said it

04-25-15  07:48am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Downloads get a thorough picking through and tossing out of "off" pics. Then it's on to the final destination folders, which could be in one of three different hard drives now. I said "drives" and "folders" because I backup as I file.

04-22-15  04:32pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

The smart approach from the European perspective would be to lower prices enough that they could be competitive, but still have a greater margin of profit than they did before the devaluation of the Euro.

04-19-15  03:54am

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, in all ways. The thumbnail should show all of what you will see, and it should link to the actual photo.

Otherwise, you might not know that the model is smaller in the photo than the thumb shows; I've seen this before and it's irritating. Or you can't see the bottom half of a portrait oriented photo; same comment.

Really, as no-brainers go, this one is definitely in the top 3. But some people would rather listen to their own excuses.


04-11-15  02:40am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't notice the flaws -- unless they're there. "Skin flaws" fits the question, but there are many kinds, some inconsequential and some not. It doesn't happen often, but I've been grossed out by the details of a few girls and really changed my mind about them once they were under the HD macroscope.

And I'm not into porn for "realism." It's the stuff of fantasy. Surgical scars from tit jobs, pimply butts, and some birth marks are sometimes just too real to take.


04-09-15  04:39pm

Reply
22
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, I don't mix my Starbucks with fuck stars. What if someone saw?

04-08-15  04:27pm

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Whatever works with the rest of what she's wearing. I don't know many terms for female footwear, but if it's tasteful, that's all I could ask for.

04-05-15  09:48am

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think they're bs, so where's the surprise?

04-02-15  07:01pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't have a laptop with a 21-inch screen. That one's for "yo mama."

03-31-15  03:13pm


Shown : 1-25 of 3080 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.63 seconds.