Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3020)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (238)  |   Replies (2666)

Other:   Replies Received (1461)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 3020 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I like skinny girls with nice round places here 'n there.

08-20-14  04:50pm

N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

48 is OK with me. Who knows? If it's a BIG problem, it could take awhile. I remember when one of the ATK sites went the way of all pixelized flesh and it took them months to recover.

Besides, if the user is patient, they have a little more of an obligation to behave themselves as well.

08-18-14  06:01pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It puts the fantasy girl into reality. From there, it's a bigger turn-on putting her back into fantasy sometimes.

But it depends. Doesn't it always? Some sites have better BTS stuff than others. And if none of them ever had any, that wouldn't be a problem.

08-14-14  06:11pm

N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

When the now-defunct iBill was a 3rd party biller and they were getting dysfunctional, I got accused of sharing my use-pass more than once. Care to guess which party was actually responsible??

Once I joined a site that suddenly blocked access for two weeks with no explanation, then resumed accepting logins after they'd so very wisely SHRUNK all of the photo sizes.

There have been a few other crappy experiences over the years. As in "crap table," I suppose. It's always a gamble, even when it looks like a sure thing.

08-12-14  03:20pm

N/A Reply of skippy's Reply

ROFL, that was well-said.

08-10-14  11:02am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I've seen sets of over 400 images of what I didn't want, and sets of 25 that I thought were great. It's tempting to say at least 100 (200?) to increase the odds of getting something I'd like, but I wonder if having more really would.

08-10-14  08:21am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

When men are "topless," they are usually either relaxing on a warm day or they are doing some kind of sweaty manual labor that isn't particularly unsafe with no shirt on.

I could say that women should have the same rights as men to "go topless," but I can't imagine women walking around on city streets or in shopping areas with their titties swinging just because they have the right to any more than men would.

Besides, local governments and private businesses have their laws and policies, respectively, to prohibit inappropriate dress or lack of it.

Regarding public beaches, perhaps a referendum would be the best way to gauge public opinion on the mater. Not that everyone would be happy with the results, whatever they might be.

08-09-14  09:39pm

N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

I'm busy and impatient, so I usually go for the slam-bang by fast-fowarding, yet there are times when I become intrigued by the "plot development" and check it out. Sometimes it really does make the sex part hotter. So it's "quite important," even if it's not very often.

08-07-14  06:06pm

N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

Both PU and TBP reviews. Sometimes one is more up-to-date than the other, and often each will give info that the other won't have.

In the Olympics, there are multiple judges, so why not for "indoor sports," as it is sometimes called?

08-05-14  06:47pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Fires spread very quickly. Fractions of seconds count. People first ... and probably last.

08-01-14  10:14am

Visit PJ Girls

PJ Girls

Good at What It Does

I'm winding up a membership to this site and it's been good for what it's supposed to do, which is focus on Czech pussy in exclusive scenes, using both photos and videos as the media. The models are usually the popular ones; they have reached a population of 80, plus there are four really older ones at the bottom of the list for those who would like ...

The pics come in two sizes, 2400x3600 and 1600x2400. You can also switch viewing sizes in the galleries between those. They're nice and colorful and the girls dress in sexy clothes, though they soon have them off in order to put the assorted instruments of cunt stretching in.

The videos come in two sizes plus they stream. I never downloaded any, but tried streaming one. It was pixelated on my 1920x1080 screen. However, their videos to download also come in that size.

I was hoping for a lot more ass showing on this site (the kind you find at TorridArt, for instance), but none was ever promised, so I'll live with it and make it a one-time join unless the owners would like to give that Czech butt a little more display time. I shall remain at all times ready to worship.

For those who like an ALS-Scans type of approach with not quite as many photos but certainly enough, this site is definitely worth consideration.

07-27-14  03:20pm

Replies (0)
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I made the acquaintance of a hairy-legged women once long ago (like 37 years ago). She lived with another woman in town. Back in those days, it wasn't so easy for girls like them.

07-25-14  07:08pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I've got about 15 unused blank CDs. I haven't touched them in at least 2 years. Something must have happened!

07-25-14  07:05pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I actually made up all of the possible terms. Can you believe it? ;)

Hadn't heard of it as "landing strip," nor had I consulted the very reputable (a-hem) Urban Dictionary, which is probably by now more voluminous than the OED.

But back to the real subject at hand: As far as landing on it, I suppose that's OK. At least from there one has a pretty good idea where the hangar is.

07-16-14  04:46pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

This is the fourth time this same poll question has been responded to. Currently, with 19 responses (half the votes, approx., of each previous poll), there's been a definite trend away from interest in 3D porn since the first poll in 2011.

I remember in the forum a while back when some people were saying it was the future of porn. Not yet, huh?

07-06-14  04:41pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Most of the stuff I have, even from 12 years ago, I was pretty picky about choosing. Ohh ... another thing: I paid for it.

I'll usually just view it in a smaller screen.

07-04-14  02:56pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Wittyguy and Khan understood the question. Thanks for the clarifications for those who did not.

07-03-14  02:46pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I actually like to see some of them up close if they look nice, but even if there never were any closeups of them, I can't say I'd mind too much.

06-29-14  05:04am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The score reflects how much the reviewer recommends the site, and that's all based on the question "Is it worth it?"

Imagine two sites that are pretty equal in all respects except for price; it would make sense for the lower-priced one to get a higher score.

06-25-14  05:32pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

For those who don't understand the question, I'm sorry. I'd like to explain it to you ... but I don't have any crayons.

06-25-14  05:22pm

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Unwitting yet brilliant -- must be a natural.

06-22-14  05:12am

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Somehow it seems that a boycott of a company that makes underwear has more chances of success than a boycott of a porn website with a webmaster of dubious character and/or unpleasant personality.

Guys slip into their briefs, it seems, for qualitatively different reasons than they click "join," even if they know the webmaster is a wretched troll.

And usually disputes with webmasters are more isolated and interpersonal. They don't incite the kind of activism that happens when outsourced textile workers are shut out of the factory after forming a union.

It's probably because there's a lot more at stake.

Well, at least we have our reviews ...

06-21-14  04:51pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Four if we don't count the ones that died and are "buried" on the premises. It's nice how they come right in their own little box.

06-19-14  12:07pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I feel that a review has to be written in prose, but the standard format for pro's and con's here is bullet points. That doesn't necessarily easy, because you have imply analysis based on what you expect people to want to know. Still, the bottom line I find harder to do if I really want to write it well.

If I don't give much of a squat, then there's no big difference. It all comes out like it's from a semi-automatic firearm: bullet, bullet, bullet ...

Lazy reviewers are actually better for lazy readers, anyway.

06-13-14  04:34pm

N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

"Normal Clothes" is a broad category, but of course it is. To me, it's anything the model might be wearing that I might see a girl wearing on the street or at a social gathering, which could be business attire (the boss or the secretary), an evening gown, a summer dress, winter wear, fall fashions, or a pair of cotton shorts and a cut-off T-shirt.

It's a real turn-on to see them getting out of such things. Lingerie's OK, but honestly, it's more of a turn-on in real life.

06-03-14  01:51pm

Shown : 51-75 of 3020 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 2.42 seconds.