Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (218)  

Feedback:   All (2957)  |   Reviews (115)  |   Comments (236)  |   Replies (2606)

Other:   Replies Received (1452)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 2957 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

I've been really digging the facial expressions of some models, and I like to zoom in them, so I chose 3000x2000. Sometimes a nice expression is in a rather distant shot.

Oh, that's true for other aspects as well.

02-22-14  02:30pm

N/A Reply of jberryl69's Reply

Get well soon! I've had a few surgeries. Not always easy to get through it all.

RE: the question, no. I know Hugh Hefner has sworn by it, but I'm still not ready to tinker with my body chemistry that way.

02-22-14  02:27pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Sometimes. They're the times when the super humongous download isn't necessary because the steroid-driven option b will suffice.

02-13-14  03:08am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I forced myself to choose one, the girls in their 20's. Sometimes the teen girls have yet to really blossom. However, legal to 30-ish is my main interest. And a few older ones are really hot, too, like Cassidey Raye, who's made something of comeback; she's over 30 now and looks AWESOME.

02-09-14  06:13am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, my Merrie Melodies are of a different genre.

02-06-14  05:03pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Once. And that was all I needed to know! Belly-down flat, baby! YEAH!

02-03-14  04:21pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Dimensions usually do it for me, but as JayG pointed out, only seeing is believing. 1.5 GB of "hi-def" dumb camera work, dim lighting, and dodgy editing will diss the damn thing pretty quick.

02-01-14  03:26am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Days ... weeks ... sometimes months ...

02-01-14  03:22am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I'm more of a World Series man myself ...

01-25-14  06:28pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

2 cents here, 2 cents there. After a while, it adds up to a lot of foul-smelling wind.

01-18-14  10:55am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think the good ones do act. With them, there's more to it than just striking poses. It's a mistake to confuse the medium with the intent of the photographer and/or model. And going to the dictionary is for people who aren't sure if they know what the word means but somehow presume that lexicographers had anticipated my poll question.

You can tell the difference between just posing and creating a mood that goes into a narrative framework. The same goes for video.

01-18-14  10:50am

N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

I always look at face first, but I look for ass. Should the ass appear first (rare), then I'd look for face.

01-13-14  05:57pm

N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Ditto the Capn ...

01-10-14  08:06am

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Some may want to, some may simply not care, and some don't. I remember Susana Spears being on a site with a pseudonym for about week, after which she was "renamed" Susana Spears. That's a model who has a career.

What I don't believe is the blanket statement that answers "yes" to the question, even for a single site. It's too general to be true.

01-07-14  03:39pm

Visit Playboy.tv

Reply of Hooliganzo's Comment

I'll have to toss in my 2 bits on this, too, in agreement with the others that the live phone call cancellation requirement was a put off. The rep who answered was female and had a nice sexy voice and was very polite, but that was also part of what unnerved me. I was firm about cancelling and she didn't put up much resistance, but I also felt kind of sorry for her, doing that kind of work.

And I haven't rejoined since, either, which means 2-3 years ago. Playboy seems to try to do things a different way sometimes -- maybe it's part of their branding concept -- but this aspect of it is a mistake.

01-05-14  12:20pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I once rejoined a site that had closed its access but not its subscription sales.

Once joined a site that shut down for two weeks with no forewarning or explanation and came back on for the final week of my (final) subscription. (They'd spent those two weeks reducing the quality of their content.)

I once got kicked off a site for my access having been sharing by someone apparently working at the billing company, which screwed over the sites, too.

I've rejoined sites that defined "update" simply as "change the dates." I gave 'em hell at PU.

And I've seen content updates stop permanently in the middle of a subscription at a variety of sites over the years.

One thing I've learned is not to say, "I've seen it all." Another is to stop and unearth the unexamined assumptions I'm making when I'm considering a subscription.

01-05-14  12:15am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's similar content ... yet there is a lot of variety ... yet it's about pretty much the same thing ... and that's OK ...

01-02-14  06:05pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

TV in the US is a huge ripoff if you pay for it because you're just paying them to shove idiotic ads at you between programs that are mostly of a juvenile mentality. There are a few good things here and there, just as a desert might have an oasis every few hundred km or so.

Might as well have your intelligence bypassed as you are about to watch something that really interests you.

12-31-13  03:00pm

N/A Reply of LPee23's Poll

My feelings range from "oh, no-o-o!" to "tough beans" on this one. To haven't had collected is to have never seen, so it's based on whether you think you missed something good or not.

It's the one good thing about sites that carry earlier material. TeenModels, for example, has had quite a few sets that used to be on SuperGlam years ago with improvements in size if not in the watermark.

When things like that happen, you never really know what has disappeared for good.

I'd love to see a revival of material that showed up on a French language site called TopMiss. It had a lot of exclusive stuff of many of the "A-list" European models such as Marketa Belonoha and Bambi.

Also would love seeing a revival of Linda O'Neil's old site, updated to current standards. But maybe that one actually has gone for good.

12-27-13  03:31am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The idea of "Oogie for Xmas" has somehow never lost its appeal.

12-23-13  07:31am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

"..more intuitive design and layout." Talk about an edge!

12-19-13  12:56pm

Visit Body In Mind

Body In Mind
Reply of Arlen84's Review

My recent experience of this site (membership ending earlier this month) is similar to yours. I can't understand why they don't make all of the image sizes available in zips.

I'm also disappointed by the blurriness in some of the images, especially the "extra" sizes, some of which when viewed at full size make you wonder who just hit you in the face with the pie. One really has to inspect the goods carefully here.

They had a few sets of the Hungarian beauty Gabi/Mia (as at Hegre) that looked interesting until I realized how poor the image quality was. I passed up on the whole lot.

Another thing is that some of material here is not exclusive. It's from PhotoDromm, Lizzie's Secrets (or perhaps Eva's Garden), etc. There's not a lot of this, but I think it should be noted. It could actually be a plus for people who discover Lizzie Ryan but can no longer join the now defunct (above unlinked) sites she appeared on.

I did find some nice stuff of certain models, such as "Karmen" (Jasmine Andreas), so I figured joining was worth it, but I hadn't been member for nearly four years.

12-17-13  01:20pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wonder if there's a genetic difference between those who say they like it and those who don't. I sure can't understand the appeal of pee as something sexual ...

(Returns to chair) Sure, it's nice, but just for relief.

12-15-13  06:04am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What are the chances?


12-13-13  03:36pm

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I haven't had any "Oh, hey! How 'ya doin'?" moments with the company info, but it's good to have it available.

12-05-13  12:26pm

Shown : 51-75 of 2957 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.38 seconds.