Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3080)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (241)  |   Replies (2723)

Other:   Replies Received (1471)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 3080 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes, in all ways. The thumbnail should show all of what you will see, and it should link to the actual photo.

Otherwise, you might not know that the model is smaller in the photo than the thumb shows; I've seen this before and it's irritating. Or you can't see the bottom half of a portrait oriented photo; same comment.

Really, as no-brainers go, this one is definitely in the top 3. But some people would rather listen to their own excuses.


04-11-15  02:40am

Reply
27
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't notice the flaws -- unless they're there. "Skin flaws" fits the question, but there are many kinds, some inconsequential and some not. It doesn't happen often, but I've been grossed out by the details of a few girls and really changed my mind about them once they were under the HD macroscope.

And I'm not into porn for "realism." It's the stuff of fantasy. Surgical scars from tit jobs, pimply butts, and some birth marks are sometimes just too real to take.


04-09-15  04:39pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, I don't mix my Starbucks with fuck stars. What if someone saw?

04-08-15  04:27pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Whatever works with the rest of what she's wearing. I don't know many terms for female footwear, but if it's tasteful, that's all I could ask for.

04-05-15  09:48am

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I think they're bs, so where's the surprise?

04-02-15  07:01pm

Reply
31
N/A Reply of lk2fireone's Poll

I don't have a laptop with a 21-inch screen. That one's for "yo mama."

03-31-15  03:13pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I always hear calliope music playing in the background when I see fisting content, along with peeing, object insertions, and elephants standing on their hind legs with balls wrapped around their trunks.

03-26-15  01:10pm

Reply
33
Visit Cherry Pimps Network

Cherry Pimps Network
(0)
Reply of Avalanche's Reply

The reason I said that there wasn't full access to the model sites was because from the "Sites and Niches" menu, which opens up to a page of the sites, each with a photo, access was denied for the model sites. I see now that that has changed. Quite recently, in fact.

Thanks for the heads up on that. Cheers!


03-24-15  06:35pm

Comment
34
Visit Cherry Pimps Network

Cherry Pimps Network
(0)

ChloeAmourXXX

I joined ChloeAmourXXX for 19.95 (1 mo) thru Epoch not knowing it was part of the Cherry Pimps Network. The Chloe site already seems to have stopped updating (mid last month), but the content quality is really good. There are 22 photo sets and of those, 18 corresponding videos. There are only 2 photo sizes: 1024 px and 56xx px for viewing or downloading. There are three hc b/g sets and about as many g/g.

But I found there's more to it. You get access to the CherryPimps site and the CherrySpot site. Pimps has the Spot content plus the live show archives for each girl. There's a lot here. My download speeds (in 19th placed USA) run about 530kbps.

And I've got a few gripes. One, some older photo thumbs don't show, but at least their links still work. Two, the thumbs only show the top half of portrait-oriented photos.

Still, it's a buy for 19.95. (This last paragraph revised after message from site webmaster.)

03-24-15  02:57pm

Replies (3)
Reply
35
N/A Reply of exotics4me's Reply

No, I was thinking of something less complicated, like "Big Alien Dick." After all, we already have "BBC."

03-20-15  12:40pm

Reply
36
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Funny, I also first wondered if the space aliens might be sexually attractive. Why reject them if they can be incorporated into some good porn? And there would be new acronyms like "BAD."

Go ahead. Guess! ;)


03-16-15  06:12pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

No, because I don't know what it means to be an average porn surfer.

03-14-15  01:31am

Reply
38
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It depends. And on what? I can't say. Sometimes I just don't care about it, and sometimes I really do.

03-08-15  08:00am

Reply
39
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Reply

Well, it's probably true that they're related words. I think, for instance, that a rebate is actually a form of "bait."

03-08-15  07:58am

Reply
40
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(0)
Reply of Jay G's Comment

FYI, it's called "bait and switch."

03-07-15  06:02pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I don't think of my personal budget as the benchmark criteria for determining the overvaluation of pornography. But then, who knows? ;)

03-05-15  01:14am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Pretty much the same as WittyGuy

03-01-15  04:51am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nope. Ain't never done that.

02-27-15  10:27am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It always depends. I've seen a bit of goofiness for the first time from certain models and found it attractive, but with others, it's not so much. And if it's with food, forget it. Well, probably.

02-25-15  03:17pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I usually power it off between brushing and flossing.

02-22-15  03:49pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I haven't been to the RabbitsReviews site in quite some time. But to answer the question: no, and I didn't know that blind banners to it existed in any pay sites.

Should they exist, it doesn't help at all in terms of trusting RabbitsReviews.


02-21-15  03:43am

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Something in my basic brain says, "Find woman not already pregnant!"

02-19-15  02:13pm

Reply
48
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

They'd be perfectly fine if they were realistic enough, meaning that they'd take things personally when there was nothing intentionally personal about a given statement and they'd remind you of something bad that you did five years ago and which hadn't been brought up in all that time.

02-15-15  08:32am

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To me, paying for a site membership means there are no ads to distract my attention when or after I've logged in. People can feel free to express disagreement with that. Doesn't mean I'll change my mind. Maybe they could change theirs.

02-13-15  02:15pm

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Well, sometimes I feel a bit like Beldar ("Consume Mass Quantities!"), but the truth is I get the best and then some of the good enough.

"Everything" would take things a lot further, and I've got enough little hard drive friends hanging around my desk already!


02-09-15  04:41pm


Shown : 26-50 of 3080 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.4 seconds.