Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3062)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (240)  |   Replies (2706)

Other:   Replies Received (1469)  |   Trust Ratings (83)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 3062 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It always depends. I've seen a bit of goofiness for the first time from certain models and found it attractive, but with others, it's not so much. And if it's with food, forget it. Well, probably.

02-25-15  03:17pm

Reply
27
N/A Reply of messmer's Poll

I usually power it off between brushing and flossing.

02-22-15  03:49pm

Reply
28
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I haven't been to the RabbitsReviews site in quite some time. But to answer the question: no, and I didn't know that blind banners to it existed in any pay sites.

Should they exist, it doesn't help at all in terms of trusting RabbitsReviews.


02-21-15  03:43am

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Something in my basic brain says, "Find woman not already pregnant!"

02-19-15  02:13pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

They'd be perfectly fine if they were realistic enough, meaning that they'd take things personally when there was nothing intentionally personal about a given statement and they'd remind you of something bad that you did five years ago and which hadn't been brought up in all that time.

02-15-15  08:32am

Reply
31
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

To me, paying for a site membership means there are no ads to distract my attention when or after I've logged in. People can feel free to express disagreement with that. Doesn't mean I'll change my mind. Maybe they could change theirs.

02-13-15  02:15pm

Reply
32
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

Well, sometimes I feel a bit like Beldar ("Consume Mass Quantities!"), but the truth is I get the best and then some of the good enough.

"Everything" would take things a lot further, and I've got enough little hard drive friends hanging around my desk already!


02-09-15  04:41pm

Comment
33
Visit Babespotting.tv

Babespotting.tv
(0)

Babe Reposts Spotted

I had a look again at this site today, and they've been recycling some material. I checked my collection from previous subscriptions to make sure.

This is not to warn anyone away from the site, though, especially if they've never joined. It's a good one for lovers of the nude model genre.

02-07-15  08:57am

Replies (0)
Reply
34
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I'll look at the tech specs but, as Jay G points out, hi-def is what you see, which to me is clarity and depth almost to the point of being unreal sometimes. Unreal, probably, because I don't get hi-def as often as I get damn-good-enough-def.

02-07-15  03:22am

Reply
35
N/A Reply of jberryl69's Poll

Other than differences in favorite models, my answer is remarkably close to that of rearadmiral--even the Charlton Heston allusion (minus the gun).

01-27-15  11:25am

Reply
36
Visit MC Nudes

MC Nudes
(1)
Reply of LPee23's Comment

I also noticed the old Teenrotica content showing up on MC Nudes. They've been doing this since August 2014.

Peeing isn't what I'm into, but the image dimensions are larger, which is good since the TR 2000px max size of yore is actually a problem with the newer higher resolution monitors when you want to zoom in on something special, be it a smile, a nice backside, or, for some, a shaft of gold.


01-22-15  02:11pm

Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If there's something good enough at a smaller size, I might skip the humungous one, or I might decide to wait and download later when I have enough time for it. But this doesn't happen that often.

01-21-15  04:50pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I've come across very few sites that will just autologin, but they are nice because it makes for immediate entry.

01-20-15  04:46pm

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Maybe Pepe Le Pew does.

01-17-15  09:49am

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Funny you should ask. I just did. And it's not the first time. There wasn't much time left on the membership, which expires probably tomorrow, and the site had already been changed to something so bad that the shutdown was just icing on the shitty cake.

01-09-15  04:29am

Reply
41
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Same as LPee23 -- unless the expression is naturally unpleasant.

01-08-15  01:21am

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I appreciate that there's an effort to make them, but there's a mood for parody and there's a mood for porn, and they just aren't the same!

01-05-15  06:16am

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I choose outside as #1 because even though it does depend on who is doing the shooting (along with the weather and equipment), outdoor shoots are usually worse overall than the ones done indoors.

Too much sunlight, too much cloud cover, storms moving (not kidding!), dirt, tall grass, pretty girls with orange skin, and bugs all contribute in varying degrees to a disappointing view.

Hardly any of that is going to come into an indoor shoot, not even bugs. You won't find them exploring the girl's anus from a closer perspective than yours.

I do blame these problems on the photographers, of course. They should know better. After continuing to see over a decade of this nonsense, I'm convinced that they never will.


12-27-14  07:12am

Reply
44
Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
(1)
Reply of williamj's Comment

I just checked at the site and the girl will be Lexa (Melisa), probably the most-featured girl there.

12-26-14  06:58am

Comment
45
Visit Daphoz

Daphoz
(0)

Another site redone for the worse

Since I've been the one commenting on this site and my last comment was positive, I now have to update facts to warn anyone interested in joining.

The zips are gone. Now, it's just slide shows. Also, the only sizes I've seen are 1200 px or 2000 px, both on the long end, so they've cut out pics of sizes that were larger when I joined a couple of years ago.

I've seen this kind of thing happen to a few sites before, where they actually take away what is positive about the site. It still astonishes me.

I'd joined knowing that it had stopped updating after putting a lot of old filler content in most recently, but I was still interested in some updates that were put in between my last membership and the one I'm on now.

The one that wasted $25.

01/08/15 Update: Now it's become a lesbian site, in the making apparently, as there are login or signup links. None of the previous content appears as far as I can tell.

12-25-14  02:33pm

Replies (0)
Reply
46
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

LOL. And what has ATK Exotics done lately for Kwanzaa? It's comin' up pretty soon, y'know!

12-21-14  02:39pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Picked "other" on this one because it's more of a quality than quantity question to me. There can be heaps of "holiday" (always Christmas or New Years, of course) content available in Dec. and Jan. as far as I'm concerned so long as it appeals.

Over the years, I've collected a pretty good pile of the stuff with "that special holiday rear cheer" in mind. Back when Sophie Paris was active, I now recall, she did some stunning work at Hegre-Art in the red and white. It has traversed several hard drives since then.

Hey, it sure beats seeing stupid ads and the same old Christmassy crap on TV/the Web/print.


12-21-14  04:59am

Reply
48
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Given the choices of things lickable, the armpits wouldn't have come to mind had I not seen it on a porn site.

12-17-14  05:34am

Reply
49
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I choose "a fair amount," though my habits have certainly changed. There's often nothing on that I'll watch faithfully as I did in the '70's and '80's, only specials that interest me (in the arts) or documentaries. Most of television is for dolts (reality shows about extra-marital affairs, etc.) or political whiners (Fox/MSNBC).

At least there's PBS! I'm thankful for that.

I read somewhere recently that one network paid about 4 times as much for syndication licensing of "Walker Texas Ranger" than another did for "NYPD Blue." I think that might tell you something about the average viewer.


12-14-14  06:25am

Reply
50
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Reminds me of one of those jokes that ends with "Oh, that was just the demo."

I don't know why there are sometimes differences in photo and video content of a scene. Did someone have a fit of uncontrollable coughing during the video? Or, for that matter, while taking the photos? Or did someone simply not give a shit?

I usually preview a scene by looking at the thumbs, so no matter which medium is missing the sought-after juicy bits, it sucks whether they're not there when the download finishes or you never knew that they WERE there.


12-13-14  04:48am


Shown : 26-50 of 3062 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.68 seconds.