Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (3093)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (241)  |   Replies (2736)

Other:   Replies Received (1473)  |   Trust Ratings (82)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 3093 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

I remember watching a porn flick back in the pre-internet days that had the "girl fucks guy to get revenge on her cheating boyfriend" plot. But considering the responses that came before this one, I take it that the term "revenge porn" hasn't been in use enough to be clearly defined enough in meaning, at least for poll responses. I won't watch rape or sometimes even depictions of it.

09-25-15  09:03am

N/A Reply of Lionheart's Poll

It's a turn-off, though a qualified one. I've seen photo galleries in which it was sexy for the girl to start off wearing glasses, but if she doesn't take them off, soon enough or at all, then it becomes a big negative. I like to see the girl's eyes.

If she never takes them off, it just ruins things for me. That's doubly true for sunglasses.

09-19-15  02:28am

Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
Reply of LPee23's Reply

A site cannot predict what one user or another would like to see in closeup, so having a higher available resolution allows the user to do his own. I personally like to zoom in on the model's face in some shots, and elsewhere in others. 3000x5000 at ITC would certainly be welcome and would only play to its strengths.

09-16-15  01:05pm

Visit In The Crack

In The Crack
Reply of greg909's Comment

As a pic lover myself, I also think their max pic sizes are too small. They should make them at least 4000 px, but it took forever before they caught up 2400. And it's a shame because their pics have great color.

09-15-15  03:58am

N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Q: What are you reading?
A: A magazine.
Q: What's a magazine?

09-14-15  02:19pm

N/A Reply of Pyrenees's Poll

No narrative arc is complete without a climax, and this principle applies to porn as well. The cum shot is an important point of reference, if nothing else. When I see it, I know that there will probably not be anything further to the scene that would interest me.

I don't really care if it's faked with some creamy bakeshop confection or whatever the fuck that stuff is. It could be some kind of tacky CGI effect for all I care.

09-12-15  05:20pm

N/A Reply of Amanda's Poll

My last visit to a porn theatre or adult bookstore with viewing rooms was before the Internet switched from an emphasis on national defense and academia to commerce, social media, and all the rest. Surely, those old sleaze parlors have gone the way of the post office and the record store.

09-04-15  03:08pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Panties that "hug" the posterior are the best. Cotton or wool work nicely. The most important thing is that her cheeks are peeking out from the rounded curves at the bottom.

09-02-15  11:50pm

N/A Reply of surferman's Poll

It is a quality question for sure, as so many other things are. It's not just a "yes" or a "no."

08-31-15  05:47am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Legal to 30's

08-23-15  03:19pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It really depends on what was worn.

08-22-15  12:32am

N/A Reply of Randyman's Poll

I picked 1-3. It's a big, fat lie.

08-15-15  01:32pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Actually, it would have to depend on whether it had a good pile of stuff that I wanted before it might possibly zzzzz gone.

Basically what Jay G said.

08-08-15  03:41pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Every new thread is new for a much shorter time than it is old -- or dead, as the question goes. It's more consistent to pick up the same topic on an existing thread.

Sure, it takes work to find that old/dead/resting-in-peace thread, but I think it's worth the effort. Once revived, the "zombie" thread will once again raise its withering head on the home page.

So just mix equal parts golden rum, white rum, dark rum, apricot brandy, pineapple juice, lime juice and 1/2 part 150-proof rum, take a sip, and start searching.

07-30-15  01:02pm

Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
Reply of MPL STUDIOS's Reply

OK. It was just that third simultaneous download that was the problem. Thanks.

07-27-15  02:41pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Most of the interview videos I've seen with the cameraman (I suppose) talking have been pretty lame in terms of discussion. Interviewing is an art that takes time to be good at. A good interviewer of the models can bring out the appealing parts of their personalities and their intelligence as well. What we have instead, usually, is a guy with a list of questions that he follows from start to finish, with nothing done extemporaneously.

The only interviews I've enjoyed watching are the ones with models that have strong or playful personalities and who talk the interviewer into a corner that he's too incompetent to talk his way out of.

07-26-15  03:28am

Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios

Security Alert

In Feb., Vito commented that this site has a 300 zip file per 24hr limit.

Certainly not my experience. I've been a recurring subscriber to this site for years, and what thanks do I get? If I try to catch up and download more than THREE ZIP files (of just photos), Chicken Little wakes up in a panic and throws this "Security Alert!" bullshit page in my face, and I'm left having to plan my downloads in more detail as to when, what, and how many.
Update 072715: This has been resolved. See replies.

07-25-15  12:09pm

Replies (3)
N/A Reply of graymane's Poll

Honestly, I have no idea.

07-22-15  02:24pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Rarely since some sites use the "suggestion box that is open on the bottom, underneath of which is a wastepaper basket" approach to soliciting feedback. I can think of one that has the photo set pre-rated 100% before it is even posted. What a load of horseshit that is.

On the other hand, I've done a lot of ratings and feedback of things at the ATK sites. They've been honest.

And most of the time, I just figure that a site is going to do things the same way regardless of the feedback they get, so why bother? That's what experience has taught me.

07-18-15  11:52am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

You'll find me on the Capn's ship.

07-15-15  12:16pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Only the ones I was born with

07-13-15  11:13pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Depends on the view ...

07-11-15  11:07am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

You could either walk the 10 miles back to town, or you could drive. It's kinda like that.

07-07-15  02:26pm

Visit Met Art

Met Art
Reply of RagingBuddhist's Comment

I know what the RagingBuddhist talking about here, but I've seen the blurriness problem with HegreArt, MPL Studios, etc. etc. as well. I can't think of a site that hasn't disappointed me when there's a pic I really like and the model's face, on closer inspection, is in something of a blur.

Suffice to say that photographers and photo editors can't predict what I'm going to want, so I just try to take the good stuff and toss out the fuzzy-wuzzies that I don't want.

07-04-15  05:07am

N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

I'd rather see everything flesh-to-flesh, but since the fucking is being done by others, they get to choose and that's fine with me.

07-04-15  04:59am

Shown : 1-25 of 3093 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 1.83 seconds.