Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Drooler (220)  

Feedback:   All (2999)  |   Reviews (116)  |   Comments (237)  |   Replies (2646)

Other:   Replies Received (1459)  |   Trust Ratings (85)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 2999 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
N/A Reply of pinkerton's Poll

Dick slaps generally don't bother me. They don't happen that much, in my viewing experience anyway. A guy would have to be masochistic to keep doing it a lot. Besides, I doubt that any penis has the ability to do any real harm, such as bruises or fractures.

So it's the sight of a guy smacking a girl somewhere with his member that must turn some people off. In the face (not the mouth amid oral sex) turns me off, but it's nothing compared to throat grabbing and putting a foot on the girl's face. That's what really chills my blood.


10-19-14  06:05am

Reply
2
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

78.1 is where mine stands. Anything above that, therefore, should be considered a compliment.

10-18-14  12:55am

Reply
3
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

When it's out of synch, it gives a new twist to "What's Up Tiger Lily?" But that's OK; I usually watch 'em pre-talkies.

10-13-14  07:45am

Reply
4
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I wonder what the purpose of the question is. Is it an inquiry that might lead to a policy of some sort, should the majority seem to be in favor of one? I'm just wondering.

Sometimes I mind if the topic has been brought up before. I ask, "Why start a new thread?" But it's not a big deal. I'll go whatever way things go as far as the forum is concerned.


10-11-14  11:59am

Review
5
Visit Ashley Doll

Ashley Doll
(1)

88.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Ashley is sweet and beautiful
-content is almost entirely exclusive (exception: one huge Hustler gallery)
-navigation is simple and straightforward
-design is simple with a good color scheme
-ample number of pics in each gallery; varies from approx. 80 to over 200
-videos in 4 formats (WMV low (960x540), WMV high (1440x810), iPhone, and iPad)
-fast-moving downloads (1.5-2.5Mbsp)
-reliable billing company: Epoch
-blog and forum are active with Ashley posting/participating, though the forum isn't terribly active on the member end
Cons: -only one file size for pics in zips: huge (4752x3168; sometimes 5184x3456); FYI: enlarged in galleries 1067x1600
-galleries display no more than 15 thumbs per page
-in gallery section, number of pics per gallery and file sizes not stated; in video section, lengths, file sizes, and dimensions of videos not stated
-updates once a week with a photo gallery or video
-15 videos to date
-41 photo galleries to date
-shoots are "professional," which doesn't always mean great
-monthly membership price of US $29.69 will discourage some from joining
Bottom Line: I really liked this site. It's softcore without toys. I knew it was kind of a splurge given the amount of content, but it hasnít given me any buyerís remorse.

Ashley first came to my attention through David Nudes, where she is "Taylor Ashley." She's also appeared at Hustler, Twistys and Met-Art, and even did a bit of b/g hardcore at Exploited College Girls. As she makes clear in her blog, she does not intend to do any more hardcore with males. However, she is bisexual, so who knows if she'll take the g/g route some time?

More on photos: Ashley definitely has a way with the camera, gushing sweetness with her smile and her eyes. She has a nice, trim frame with lovely all-natural boobs and an ass that will make you glad to be alive just to see it. I only wish that the photos didnít have so much hot streaming sunlight coming over her, especially in the indoor shoots by windows, but thereís enough good stuff after that kind have been pitched out.

More on videos: These are mostly posing and smiling and stripping without any music or talk to speak of. There are just a scant few that have her masturbating and moaning, but they are nice.

Clearly, this is a single-model site for the softcore fan with a few extra bucks to reallocate from the beer fund to something thatís gonna last a while longer. With that in mind, I recommend it.

10-11-14  05:10am

Replies (1)
Reply
6
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I click. Therefore, it is.

Usually.


10-09-14  06:50pm

Reply
7
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

If the cameraman really has something worthwhile to say, then fine. It just hasn't been my experience.

10-07-14  11:27am

Reply
8
Visit MPL Studios

MPL Studios
(3)
Reply of Vito's Comment

I'm a current member. Now they just give the file numbers without the size, such as 4287001, 4287002, etc. I like this better myself because I can replace a smaller-sized pic with a larger one with a simple drag-and-replace.

But everyone has their own preference for file naming.

The folder names are as Tangub said.


10-06-14  04:54pm

Reply
9
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I'm with Denner on the "full body visions," meaning, I think, from the thigh up (or foward). Some of the scenes of Anjelica at 18only and Wowgirls/porn come to mind. They're pretty much done right.

A some brief closeups of the action are good, but not more than a few at 3 seconds or so each. And I mean the action with the girl in focus -- not some man ass and dangleberries taking up most of the view. (I could do that myself with a couple of mirrors -- if I ever had the inclination.)

Multiple camera angels are just fine so long as the scene is set up properly and the editing afterwards isn't done by some idiot who's checking his Twitter account while the closeup of the girl's face keeping playing and playing and playing.


10-05-14  10:39am

Reply
10
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Maybe it would be OK if the women, in turn, called the males things like "bastard," "shorty," "you pud," and "numbnuts," but it would be even better without any pejorative language at all.

Sex doesn't have to get mean.


10-01-14  03:00pm

Reply
11
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Just when you thought she was only gonna do it with that sweet pussy of hers -- in myriad positions, of course -- whoa! She's takin' it up the can!

Anal is like a waffle sandwich (or a sandwich waffle, if you're already bored with the other one). The marketing aspect of it upstages the act, which really isn't that big of a deal.

So keep that in mind the next time you think about having a Hot Pocket.


09-29-14  04:02pm

Reply
12
Visit Zishy

Zishy
(0)
Reply of Monahan's Comment

TBP classifies it first as NN porn (non-nude porn), so I guess that's what it is, like an unopened bag of snacks.

The site preview shows a few shots of what look like nudity, just here and there. Very clever.


09-28-14  12:23pm

Reply
13
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I wait sometimes for a lower rate, especially if it is really only for a month and not a teaser rate over more than a month.

Sometimes there's a discount offer that just pops up in an email as a nice surprise.

But sometimes I just join if I have pretty good idea of what I'm in for and the regular price isn't over $25 US.


09-25-14  09:18am

Reply
14
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

About as much as I enjoy hand-made tits ... not!

09-23-14  07:33pm

Reply
15
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

It almost never does, and when it does, it's only a minor positive effect and is, all things considered, unnecessary.

There have been/are models with small breasts who are very lovely, such as Presley Dawson and Jassie. I'd think of more, but I can't because I don't usually remember models by their tits anyway.


09-21-14  03:01pm

Reply
16
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Nary a one, now and forever.

09-18-14  10:42am

Reply
17
N/A Reply of skippy's Reply

Lorena and Marketa (Belonoha) are other good examples. Thanks. Cassidy Raye comes to mind, too.

09-14-14  09:26am

Reply
18
N/A Reply of skippy's Poll

I'd say that if you're no longer fresh then chances are you can't be "too" popular -- unless staleness turns into something sought after.

And as others have said, you can't. I think of Eufrat as an example. She's been in the biz primarily as a softcore model, with a good dose of lez and a smaller one of B/G thrown in, for a long time. I still get a thrill every time I see something new of her -- which is harder to come by these days.

Maybe it's not fair to use Eufrat as an example as she has unique gift in how she interacts with the camera.

So what about Monique Alexander, who has been at it since around age 19? Or Jadra Holly --> Kirsten Price?

If they're "too" popular, then fine by me. Somehow the models/performers have more resilience in the face of fan fickleness than, say, the number one hit song (whatever that might be).


09-13-14  02:21pm

Reply
19
N/A Reply of Monahan's Poll

I'd like to be in my coffin during the viewing with a plasma screen affixed to the inside of the lid, continuously looping my favorite scene of Jenna Haze taking it from the back.

Gentle funeral music playing with an occasional "Oh, FUCK!" coming from the crypt.


09-11-14  07:11pm

Reply
20
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

It's not so much been "buyer's remorse" as it has been "consumer's resentment."

09-09-14  07:22am

Reply
21
N/A Reply of Claypaws's Poll

The face and what sexiness comes from it matters most. I was going over my collection of Lindsay Olsen and was struck once again by how she just seems to grab you with those eyes. Once you have something like that, it's all of the rest.

09-08-14  02:21pm

Reply
22
Visit ALS Angels

ALS Angels
(0)
Reply of MargulisAZ's Reply

Looks like corporate-style conformity is winning the day in the Met-Art empire.

I used to like the way photos were named at Errotica-Archives (one of the subject feifdoms): an "m" was tacked onto the end if it was "medium" size, and an "l" or and "e" if it was, respectively, "large" or "extra-large."

But now, as so often happens in times imperial, a singular convention has prevailed, so if I want to mix medium- and large-sized pictures in file number order, I can't just chuck out an "m" and put the "l" in its place, now that those attributes have to appear before the file number.

Petty, I know. But only if you're a fan of the content ... and there's plenty of that.


09-06-14  11:02am

Reply
23
N/A Reply of Vegas Ken's Poll

What do I think? They should.

How do I feel about it? I don't care for it.


09-03-14  07:09pm

Reply
24
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

What Pat said. You rarely find sites that have you pay a premium price by the unit--those that have tried have not done so well--and the content is actually much more interesting than a lot of the mainstream movies with their special effects and worn-out story lines.

Some things bear repeating more than others.


09-01-14  07:36pm

Reply
25
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I stream all the movies I watch. Quite a few years ago, I found that it's available on cable television.

08-30-14  03:31pm


Shown : 1-25 of 2999 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 2.34 seconds.