Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mrpss (9)  

Feedback:   All (7)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (2)

Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (15)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(2)
Reply of jd1961's Reply

Thanks for teh reply jd961. There is no DRM. I have been saving them on disk over the past few days.

07-28-09  09:18am

Review
2
Visit Woodman Casting X

Woodman Casting X
(2)

78.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: (1)Exclusive content
(2)Although the girls are young beautiful Europeans, they do appear to be real amateurs in real porn castings
(3)Videos can either be streamed or downloaded in WMV or MP4 format
(4)Loads of videos (over 800 total)
(5)A forum for each girl featured where you can post comments or ask Pierre Woodman himself questions about the girl or the casting itself
(6)There is a very small handful of stellar HD quality videos
Cons: (1)Price tag is outrageous 29.90 Euro translated to $42.54 USD two days ago when I joined
(2)No bonus sites included with membership
(3)Most of the content is outdated (dating back to the late 1990's / early 2000's)
(4)Aside from the handful of HD videos, most of the video quality is consistent with the standard of when it was shot (Late 1990's / early 2000's)
(5)No picture galleries
Bottom Line: This site features photographer Pierre Woodman while casting several potential models for his porn shoots. The site currently has 736 castings posted, but only 70 of them involve hardcore content. In general, the content is exclusive and unique, but the price tag is huge at $42.54 USD. Especially since most of the content dates back to the late 1990's or early 2000's.

Also, since Pierre Woodman is French and most of the girls he is casting are either French, Russian, or Hungarian, a wide majority of the interviews are conducted in languages other than English. There are a small handful that are either done in English or translated to English, but the majority are not.

So, I'll start by discussing the 70 hardcore castings. These hardcore castings are extremely hardcore! The videos start off slow with Pierre talking to the girl for a long time before she even begins to undress. But once the action starts, Pierre shows no mercy on these chicks. All of the hardcore castings include rough sex, rough anal, ass spanking, and hair pulling. It is not as extreme as what you would find at sites like facialabuse or sweetloads, but the girls don't seem to expect him to get that rough with them, so it is a turn on to see their reaction to it all.

Contrary to the 70 hardcore castings, the 666 softcore castings are extremely softcore. These scenes also start off slow, but then they end with the girl simply getting naked and doing a few poses for the camera. There is really nothing special about these scenes other than the fact that they seem to be real European amateurs, in a real casting shoot, for a real porn company. Again, very few are done in English though. So unless you are fluent in foreign languages, don't expect to understand what they are talking about.

This site also includes some generic hardcore scenes that were shot for other Pierre Woodman movies. These are generic hardcore sex scenes, and outdated just like most of the castings. However, the scenes all feature girls who have casting shoots posted in the casting section, so it is somewhat interesting to compare the amateurish looking girl in the casting shoot to the hardcore porn star that she became in the hardcore scene.

To wrap things up, this is a unique site that can be a nice find for people that dig the unique content, but the price tag is insane if you're not into the casting concept. Especially since the scenes are outdated, not conducted in(or translated to) English, and not in super quality. If you are considering joining, and would like a list of the castings that contain hardcore content or are done in English, just let me know.

07-27-09  07:53pm

Replies (3)
Review
3
Visit Back Room Casting Couch

Back Room Casting Couch
(1)

89.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Most of the models have a very natural "girl next door" look to them
-The acting is pretty good for a porn site
-Free access to exploitedcollegegirls.com if you remain a member for a second month
-The site sticks with their theme
-Site navigation is very easy
-Good download speeds (I got between 700Kb and 800Kb per second without using any sort of download manager or speed accelerator)
Cons: -It costs $29.49 per month, but there are currently only 61 scenes posted
-Video quality is slightly lower than the steller quality vids that most good sites are putting out these days
-No pictures or vid caps (All videos)
Bottom Line: This site a lot like the backroomfacial.com site that was part of the bangbros network about 6 years ago (Except this site is a little lighter on the degradation aspect).

What really makes this site great in my opinion is that they go the extra mile to sell you the illusion that the girl is just some chick looking into an add she saw and ends up getting tricked into having sex on camera without getting paid for it.

First off, most of the models look no different than the average college girl. Also, the acting was sufficient enough for me to buy into the idea that the girl does not know exactly what she is getting herself into when she shows up for the interview.

Second, sticking with the site's theme, every scene is shot in the same room, with the same guy, and he gives every girl the same spiel about how she can make $1,000 to $5,000 a day doing porn, but she has to prove she can take directions well and perform on the spot before she gets the job. What is NOT the same in every scene is how the girl reacts to this dude's sales pitch. Some girls are eager to prove they are the perfect girl for the job, some reluctantly go through with his demands, and a few even walk out on him.

Last, but not least, is the quantity and quality of videos. As stated in the cons, this site only has 61 videos as of today. The wide majority of scenes are between 20 and 40 minutes long and are between 200MB and 300MB in size. The visual quality is not bad, but not the steller quality that most sites are putting out these days. In my opinion, the slightly lower visual quality helps feed into the amateur feel of the scene. However, below are some stats from one of the vids that I downlowded to help you decide for yourself whether the quality is acceptable or not. Also, the quality of the sample vids on the preview page are representative of the quality of the members area vids.

Audio: Windows Media Audio 44100Hz stereo 96Kbps [Raw Audio 0]
Video: Windows Media Video 9 576x324 29.97fps 1100Kbps [Raw Video 1]

Bottom line, in my opinion, as far as content goes, this is my favorite site on the net today. The only reason I gave it an 89 is because I just can't justify giving a score of 90 or higher to a site that has a price tag of $29.49 but only provides 61 scenes. However, if they keep up with their weekly updates, and the quality of content stays the same as it is right now, it will be in the high 90's on my scale within a year from now.

04-25-09  11:14pm

Replies (2)
Review
4
Visit Amateur Facials

Amateur Facials
(0)

65.0
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: -Models whom are both good looking and appear to be true amateurs to porn
-A $5.99 trial
-About a third of their videos are now reposted in a better looking WMV format than the old MPG, RM, or QuickTime format that it was originally posted in
Cons: -The site does not appear to have any new material added since 2007
-Not enough sex scenes (just blowjobs and facials)
-A 4 gig daily download limit
-2/3's of the videos are still the very poor quality MPG,RM, or Quicktime vids that were originally posted years ago. Even the 1/3 of vids that have been reposted as better quality WMV files are still not that great of quality compared to today's standards
Bottom Line: This was one of my favorite sites about 10 years ago when it first came out, but it does not seem to have evolved with the rest of internet porn over the years. It does not look like they have added any new content since 2007, and 2/3's of the videos are really poor quality vids. They seem to be making an effort to repost these videos in a higher quality, but even the 1/3 of vids that have been reposted so far are not THAT great of quality compared to today's standards.

One good thing about the site is that they now offer a $5.99 two day trial. So, if you have never been a member of this site before, or simply want to redownload a handful of vids in better quality, this $5.99 2 day trial may not be a bad option for you. Even if you are sure you want to be a member for a full month, I'd recommend taking the 2 day trial first. When you cancel the 2 day trial, they offer you an option to stay a member for just $19.99 a month. So you save $4 dollars by taking the 2 day trial and reduced monthly rate as opposed to paying $29.99 for a full month right off the bat.

04-12-09  09:11pm

Replies (0)
Review
5
Visit Mack City

Mack City
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -The girls truly are amateurs
-Over 100 different models (I counted 112, but a few have bio's without any actual pictures or videos)
-Site provides a story of how the webmaster met/knows the girl and his general thoughts about her
-Most girls have multiple videos
Cons: -Navigation is horrendous
-Slow download speeds (Anywhere between 150kb/Sec and 400kb/Sec for me)
-Low video quality(not sure of the actual kpbs and other stats)
-A 2GB download limit every 24 hours
-In my opinion, a monthly fee of $29.99 is too high for such low quality vids and slow download speeds
Bottom Line: The one thing that this site delivers on is its claim to provide "Real Ghetto Amateur Content". The girls featured on this site really are amateur girls from the hood. The guy running the site even provides a paragraph or so about each girl saying how he met her, what he thinks of her(both in the sack and as a person), and even rates each girl along certain qualities such as body, face, oral skills, etc.

However, where the site really falls short(in my opinion) is navigation, speed of download, quality of videos, and the annoying 2GB download limit.

I usually do not put much weight on navigation, but this site really frustrated me. There is supposedly content in "The Journals" that is not posted in the main video section. However, you have to go thru loads of writing and a bunch of videos that is already posted in the main vid section just to find the few vids that are exclusive to this section of the site.

Another thing that really annoyed me was the 2GB per day download limit. Download limits normally do not bother me, but this site actually blocks you from the site altogether for 24 hours after you reach your 2GB limit. Other sites that I have joined only block you from downloading more content after reaching your limit (not block you from the members section altogether).

The two things above combined with really slow download speeds, low quality videos, and a $29.99 price tag resulted in me feeling like I really did not get my money's worth out of this site. It is too bad because the content itself was actually pretty good(if you are into the whole ghetto amateur thing) and true "amateur reality" sites are hard to find.

02-17-09  06:07pm

Replies (0)
Review
6
Visit 899 Movies

899 Movies
(0)

82.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Loads of content (Over 3000 full length DVD's)
-The trial gives unlimited access
-Lots of different niches
-What you see in the preview area is what you get in the members area
-Three different download speeds to choose from (150kpbs to 800kpbs)
-Download speeds were pretty good (600KB/Sec for me)
-Ability to download entire scenes or cut into multiple parts
-A categorized list by niche and search engine to help find the vids you are looking for
-Everything (other than the bonus site vids)is downloadable
Cons: -Nothing was exclusive
-No pictures to download
-Video quality could be better (800kpbs is the highest download option)
-Most of the content looked like older material
-Looks like the monthly price has almost tripled (posters below were speaking of a $9 monthly fee. It is now $24.95 per month)
Bottom Line: This site offers loads of content in several different niches. With the full access 2 day trial, your bound to get your money's worth if you have a couple of days to go through all the videos and find what interests you. However, as other posters have mentioned, a lot of the content is older stuff and the quality of the videos could be better.

One great thing about this site is "What you see on the in the preview area is what you get in the members area". You can browse through all of the DVD's, use the search engine, and even download the first 30 seconds of each clip to see if the quality is up to your standards or not. I would highly recommend spending some time in searching through the vids in the preview section before deciding whether or not to join this sight. If you don't see anything that interests you in the preview area, you definitely will not find anything that interests you in the members area.


One great thing about this site is "What you see on the in the preview area is what you get in the members area". You can browse through all of the DVD's, use the search engine, and even downlowd the first 30 seconds of each clip to see if the quality is up to your standards or not. I would highly recommend spending some time in searching through teh vids in teh preview section before deciding whetehr ofr not to join this sight. If you don't see anything that interests you in the preview area, you definately will not find anything that interests you in the members area.

02-16-09  12:34pm

Replies (1)
Reply
7
N/A Reply of Colm4's Poll

I never bother downloading pictures and there is always at least some videos that I does not look interesting from the previews, so I don't bother wasting my time downloading them. However, any video that looks half way interesting, I'll download to my C-drive. Then, when I have time to go through them all, I decide which videos I want to save to a CD before deleting and which I don't want to bother with.

02-16-09  11:12am


Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.03 seconds.