Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : RagingBuddhist (63)  

Feedback:   All (888)  |   Reviews (30)  |   Comments (88)  |   Replies (770)

Other:   Replies Received (501)  |   Trust Ratings (64)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 26-50 of 891 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
26
Visit My Free Cams

My Free Cams
(3)
Reply of Marcus's Review

A great review, Marcus. Nice details!
But I have to say we must have totally different ideas of what inexpensive means. $50 for a tit flash? That seems pretty steep to me. $50 here will get you laid in some parts of town. Granted, maybe not from "model material girls", but damn! Am I just out of touch with the cost of things or what?


02-03-14  08:22am

Comment
27
Visit ATK Archives

ATK Archives
(0)

Still getting the $12.99 offer, but...

...none of the links work. There aren't even any hyperlinks when hovering over the link to the discount, the one that says to check out ATKGirlfriends.com or even the one for "ask us here". I've tried three different browsers and there's just no reaching the site through my email. Seems someone at ATK needs to learn some basic HTML.

01-30-14  06:04pm

Replies (1)
Reply
28
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

The team that scores the most points.

(Yeah - I said it) :D


01-24-14  04:54pm

Reply
29
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

I clicked 'other' only because I'd never even thought about anyone's marital status until now. I guess that would qualify me as a 'No', but I'll eventually forget about this question and go back to not thinking about it.

01-23-14  05:32pm

Reply
30
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Didn't we have this poll before?

I think they're great. Pulling your way through puberty to classic porn you almost have to.


01-20-14  05:55pm

Comment
31
Visit Silicone Free

Silicone Free
(0)

Details?

Has anyone been on the site within, say, the last year or so and just not bothered to put up a review or comment? This has been on my maybe list for quite a while.

01-07-14  01:13pm

Replies (0)
Reply
32
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of wetandpuffy's Reply

Hi Wayne. Glad you appreciate the review. It's always good to see the people from the sites chiming in here.

I joined your site some time last year and the layout has definitely changed since then. I can't put my finger on exactly what all is different, but I can't say I remember the flash-based picture viewing at all. While I'm sure there are people who like it, to me, in browser viewing has always seemed to be the most consistently glitch-free way to go. I think that giving the user a choice between the two would be a nice addition.

As far as download speeds go, I only reported what I saw. To be fair, the problem could be on my end. Hopefully someone else here will join and put up their findings.

While I have your attention, I would like to address something I didn't feel the need to include in my review. Please tell me you're getting away from putting those long music intros on your videos. I do notice that there are a lot less of them since I last signed up there and I think that's a definite improvement.

All in all, a really good site - one I'm sure I'll come back to from time to time. Thanks again for adding the personal touch by responding here.


01-07-14  09:52am

Reply
33
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of turboshaft's Reply

LOL You can't be serious. Nothing - NOTHING - affects the rage. But even I have to admit that there are moments when things aren't red hot.

01-07-14  09:33am

Reply
34
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of turboshaft's Reply

Thank you as well, turbo. Yeah - it's definitely worth a join.

And, yes, you are correct. It should have been Mistresses. I'm turning in my Grammar Nazi badge (and arm band, of course).


01-06-14  07:34pm

Reply
35
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks, graymane.

I wouldn't say swelled up and protruding. They categorize the girls' "nether regions" in 3 groups: Puffy PEACH, what some people call "innies". Think Miela, if you know she is. If not, hit Google and you'll figure it out. Juicy CHERRY means more or less your average looking vagina and Big TACOs are the Labia Masters.


01-06-14  02:08pm

Review
36
Visit Puffy Network

Puffy Network
(1)

84.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 site access
+ Files types: wmv 1080p, mp4 in 320p, 480p, 720p &1080p
+ Bonus material from other sites
+ Zip files for pictures
+ Searches with category filters and keywords
+ In browser flash for video
+ Live cams available
Cons: - Seriously quirky flash based picture viewing
- Inconsistent download speeds
- Some might like larger pictures
- Pictures need renaming
Bottom Line: This network started out with Wet and Puffy in April 2009 with We Like To Suck added at the end of May 2011 and Wet and Pissy the end of March 2012.

Wet & Puffy is basically the solo portion of their network. The girls start out clothed, get into a bit of tease as they shed their outfits, then it's on to plenty of showing off, fingering and insertions of toys and other objects. WeLikeToSuck is the hardcore portion of the show. Surprise! It all centers around blowjobs, with more than a few of the girls giving it all up for full penetration sex. Wet&Pissy, also not surprisingly, is the pissing fetish site. All solo action, including toys and insertions.

They added high definition video starting in February 2010. The videos are clear and sharp across the board and the camerawork is what I'd call above average. There are plenty of full body shots and closeups with a fair minimum of the can't-hold-still camera that I find distracting as hell. The choice of file types and sizes make it easy to get video that suits your needs.

As far as the pictures go, I'll start by saying that they're 2800 pixels long side and it does appear that the sets were handpicked to avoid too much repetition and out of focus shots. But that's where the good stops. I've never been a fan of flash based picture viewing because there always seems to be some issues that make the navigation slow and clunky. That's definitely the case here. Some of the newest sets pop up pictures that are smaller than what's available in the zip files. Some sets have the option to enlarge to full size, some don't. There are also times when the individual pictures don't give the option to right click and save. As I moved from page to page, the worst part of it was clicking on a pic, closing the popup and winding back on the first page. The last issue with the pictures is in the naming. Saving individual pictures (when possible!) all have the same name. The zip files don't include the name of the set and they all open to a folder named Images, with the pictures themselves simply numbered (001, 002, etc.) That required a lot of renaming work.

You get the typical tabbed browsing here so getting around the sites is pretty easy and intuitive. Nothing new with that. It's an easy jump from videos to pictures to the bonus content and on to anywhere on the site. The filters do a good job of narrowing things down to get you to just what you're looking for.

Download speeds were all over the place. Using a download manager, I got speeds that ranged from around 350 to 3200 kb/s. That meant that some of the one gig+ files took almost halh an hour to download.

The bonus content here is better than most I've seen. A dozen or more scenes from 7 well-known sites updated weekly. They're in 720p mp4 - decidedly better than the 1990's resolution flash seen on countless other sites.

Advertising is kept hidden behind it's own tab and behind a button on each page. Always nice to see that.

As always, I can't say too much about the live cams because I don't care for 'em. It appears you have to sign up separately to access them and that some are free and some require you to pony up some extra cash.

All in all, I really like the site and would recommend checking it out. The videos get a 92 from me and the pictures a 75. I averaged that out to come up with 83.5 rounded up to my score of 84

01-05-14  03:14am

Replies (9)
Reply
37
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Large isn't a color, is it?

11-03-13  12:24pm

Reply
38
N/A Reply of atrapat's Poll

78.1 - But that includes some of my early scores when I guess I was being overly enthusiastic about actually being able to do reviews. I've become for more critical over the years so I'd be willing to bet that the average would be a lot lower from the last 4 or 5 years.

11-01-13  11:00am

Reply
39
N/A Reply of Thedebilman666's Reply

You win.

10-23-13  03:33pm

Reply
40
N/A Reply of Thedebilman666's Reply

Yeah - that makes sense. You're paranoid and angry and I've got issues. Got it.

10-23-13  03:18pm

Reply
41
N/A Reply of Thedebilman666's Reply

Just because people didn't jump all over your poll immediately? I think you've seriously misread the people here. But if playing the victim suits you, have at it.

10-23-13  02:57pm

Reply
42
N/A Reply of Thedebilman666's Poll

If I could figure a way to get a turkey baster full of fake cum in and out of her undetected, I might try it. But, as of yet, I haven't found a way to fake an orgasm.

10-22-13  07:45pm

Reply
43
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Don't like it one bit. Yet another reason I stick with the amateurs. If I've ever heard any name-calling, it's rare enough that I don't remember it.

10-12-13  12:30am

Reply
44
N/A Reply of asmith12's Poll

I loves 'em nekkid.
On the opposite side of this poll, I have a maximum limit. Even if it's consensual, when it gets abusive or involves pain, I'm done with it.


09-14-13  07:59pm

Reply
45
N/A Reply of Monahan's Reply

Glad to see someone else who subscribes to "If it ain't broke, don't fix it". I was pissed when I found out I couldn't get a motherboard with W2K drivers, but XP works just fine for me too.

08-18-13  12:11pm

Reply
46
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The tower is almost 15 years old. The guts have been changed 4 times - the last time was about 3 years ago.

08-18-13  12:09pm

Reply
47
N/A Reply of careylowell's Poll

Along the lines of what littlejoe said, I think it will be heavily repressed through legislation. The Wild West years of the Internet are done. Lawmakers are already pushing to police the Web - I can only see them eventually getting what they want.

08-14-13  12:22am

Reply
48
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)
Reply of Marcus's Reply

Maybe because I just had a long, hard day at work, but I think you've misunderstood the reason I made this comment.

I don't want to save the emails or make them easier to find. I'm wondering why I'm suddenly getting emails with the sender name of girlsoutwest.com that, when opened, have links with random site URLs at the end of which are my email address and full name. That reeks of my info having been sold after a recent cancellation of my membership to the site.


07-29-13  04:24pm

Comment
49
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(1)

More crap

It seems I now get an email every other day from Girls Out West with links to random sites. I was skeptical but thought maybe the links might be tied to the site somehow and that I could unsubscribe from there. Although the links don't work (odd in itself), what concerns me is that the links all have my email address AND my full name in them. It appears that GOW has sold my information to spammers. I just know I'm not too thrilled with this at all and would hope a site rep would respond to this comment.

07-28-13  01:59am

Replies (6)
Reply
50
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Unless it's pubic hair, I don't think I've ever noticed a change.

07-25-13  03:29pm


Shown : 26-50 of 891 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.07 seconds.