Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (358)  

Feedback:   All (1164)  |   Reviews (177)  |   Comments (132)  |   Replies (855)

Other:   Replies Received (694)  |   Trust Ratings (87)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 1175 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of Anonymous64's Review

Awhile back I had a bad experience with them, but recetnly signed up for the three day trail. Everything was fine, including the billing.
If you like the content, the site is good.

12-03-11  04:20am

Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines
Reply of Cybertoad's Review

I have never gotten into this niche, but you sure make it sound interesting.

10-03-11  08:17am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have, but with mixed results. Some respond. Some respond with sarcasm and most ignore me.

10-03-11  08:11am

N/A Reply of gggfan's Poll

I pick Germany and Japan. They have more wild over the top content than I have seen anywhere.

10-03-11  08:07am

Visit American Bukkake

American Bukkake
Reply of dracken's Review

Interesting review. I love the level of details. I was a member a while back and liked the site, but did not love it. I can agree with a rating of 69.

10-03-11  08:02am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I would chose strippers. I know I can't touch, but hookers are just too mechanical for me.

10-03-11  08:01am

Visit Cosplay Deviants

Cosplay Deviants
Reply of AlexMercer's Review

Nice try for a first review. But, your cons are huge and I can't see such a high score being justified without the ability to download. For me, that alone is a dealbreaker and would never join.

10-03-11  07:59am

Visit Tainster

Reply of Jaimes's Review

I appreciate that we don't have identical tastes. One thing I have always liked about PU is that we are openminded regarding what we like. Calling CFNM or extreme bondage as sick is just not what I expect to see on PU, sorry. As for your characterization of "sick and stupid sites that feature Bukkake, C.F.N.M, or worse" is just not something that is right. To each his own is a much better philosophy. Please don't take my comments to mean your views are not welcome, just don't be judgemental regarding taste.

07-31-11  03:27pm

Visit Only CFNM


Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Part of network of fetish websites, hardglam.com. Many have similar themes.
-Has three choices of video downloads. The best is HD at 1920x1080, 10378 kbps. Excellent. There is a lesser quality download at 854x480, 927 kbps and FLV streaming.
-Photos are zipdownloadable at 1900x1262 and at 1200x797. Most sites do better, but these are acceptable.
-No download limits.
-Works with download managers.
-Delicious English accents.
Cons: -Apparently not updating any longer. Presently has 27 videos, TBP has them at 25 in June of 2009. Another review site has them at 25 in May of 2010.
-Zero search capability. Listed in what I guess was date order only, but without any dates posted.
-I found the concept of a fetish within a specialized niche to be a bit strange, as well as hard to get used to. See below.
-Practically no plot, almost gonzo. Other CFNM sites I have joined have plots that make the action have a sexy context. You don't get nudity, so at least I expect my imagination to get stimulated.
Bottom Line: I have previously been a member of two other CFNM sites that I rather enjoyed. On those sites what I appreciated were sexy ladies doing for fun what on most gonzo type sites are done for male pleasure. For example, why would a woman suck a guy's cock while fully clothed, except that she really wants to do it? After all, he is doing nothing for her. Usually the women seem to be enjoying themselves. Further, a sexy woman in hot clothes gets my imagination going.

What about on this site? Zero imagination. The pretext for the action is usually so weak that it is just unbelievable. This is not fantasy, it is just gonzo, straight to the blow job sex. I like blow jobs as much as the next guy, maybe more so, but every video is the same. Besides that, the content available is just too little. At least if they were updating, you could see the site improving. Only two updates in close to two years is pathetic.

The next problem area came as a surprise. The reason I joined was that I like blow jobs, especially in top quality HD. However, nearly all the videos have the women smoking before, during and after the bj. Its bad enough I had to get used to shaved women in porn, but smoking? I tried, but I simply can't get used to it. I could never have sex with a woman who smoked, even if not in front of me. Smoking is a dirty, unhealthy habit that makes a woman smell and is not at all sexy, sorry. I did not realize how strongly I felt on this topic until this site. I kept telling myself, focus on the bj, focus on how hot the women are, etc. I like a lot of niche, even fetish material, but this site reached my limit.

A fetish within a niche website most definitely limits its market. No wonder this is an archive site.

07-31-11  08:05am

Replies (2)
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
Reply of nastytodd's Review

How is the video quality? I see that in the past it was not much, like 320x240, split into segments.

07-21-11  11:25am

Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

I am sorry I missed it, but congratulations on getting 100 points.

07-21-11  11:12am

Visit Alain Lamas

Alain Lamas
Reply of manholelover's Review

The negatives here are mostly the same as those on heterosexual solo sites. Lack of updates, poor quality, lack of interactivity. Most of us here at PU feel that solo sites are usually not that great, as well as usually overpriced for what you get. Personally I like sites that have some theme or at the least a little unusual.

07-21-11  11:11am

Visit Bound Gangbangs

Bound Gangbangs
Reply of pat362's Review

I also love kink sites and will probably join in the Fall when there are a few more scenes.

07-21-11  11:07am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not attractive at all. But then I don't like shaved pussy either. One I got used to, the other, never.

07-21-11  11:05am

Visit All Network Pass

All Network Pass
Reply of shuffman's Comment

Take a look at how many users have posted comments about the billing practices this site uses. That is enough to turn anyone off. I know you are new to PU, but believe me, it is worth the effort to read everything here before joining.

07-15-11  03:05pm

Visit Wet And Puffy

Wet And Puffy
Reply of wetandpuffy's Reply

I have considered joining and am still on the fence. How much of your site is softcore? Your concept sounds perfect for softcore, but your tour emphasizes hardcore, masturbation, etc. I like your prompt response and offer of an extension to the membership. That is most fair. I hate to say this, but most webmasters don't respond to complaints on PU.

07-13-11  06:55am

Visit Frat Pad

Frat Pad
Reply of manholelover's Review

Not only is this ridiculously expensive, it sounds like a site that is just too tame to attract customers. There are similar heterosexual sites and I doubt the market for them is very large either.

07-13-11  06:47am

Visit CFNM.net

Reply of gaypornolover's Review

I also like CFNM, but undoubtedly not the sites that you would like. I don't care for male humiliation for example. I am glad that you make the distinction between the two kinds of sites and I agree that DRM is a nonstarter. I like CFNM that shows imagination and is not just sex with clothed females.

07-13-11  06:45am

Visit Bound In Public

Bound In Public
Reply of gaypornolover's Review

Sounds a lot like every site in Kink.com. However, in those other sites you also have the option of downloading scenes, not just whole video. That separates the interviews, which I never watch or download.

07-13-11  06:40am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love the creativity but hate the censorship.

07-13-11  06:36am

Visit Slut Wife Training

Slut Wife Training
Reply of pat362's Review

It doesn't sound like they care much about the site. They have hardly updated it and the quality is not improved.

07-09-11  09:08pm

Visit Sierra's Secret

Sierra's Secret
Reply of atrapat's Comment

I always admired her looks, but found her videos mechanical and without passion. Is her more recent work any hotter? The tour does not entice me either as it doesn't give much information about the content.

07-09-11  09:06pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

WMV are the best, but I put AVI because the files are compressed and therefore smaller.

07-09-11  09:02pm

Visit First Auditions

First Auditions
Reply of gaypornolover's Review

Very nice first review. Welcome to PU.

07-09-11  09:00pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I proofread and edit until I am satisfied. The final product usually has been revised 4 to 5 times.

07-07-11  06:55am

Shown : 76-100 of 1175 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.72 seconds.