Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (364)  

Feedback:   All (1177)  |   Reviews (180)  |   Comments (133)  |   Replies (864)

Other:   Replies Received (701)  |   Trust Ratings (87)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 76-100 of 1188 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
76
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. I often go with no more than a 1280x720 becasue of file size. Midrange HD is fine for me.

01-19-12  03:43pm

Reply
77
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The content is much more important, but I do care. If a webmaster is concerned about customers, I consider it a big plus.

01-19-12  03:42pm

Reply
78
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

None. You pay for the site and should be able to do whatever you want as far as downloading. If the site has a problem, they don't get any sympathy from me.

01-19-12  03:41pm

Reply
79
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Hate them. I think they are a waste of time and not worth viewing.

01-19-12  03:40pm

Reply
80
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Former President Bush thought that Central America was places like Ohio and Indiana and South America included Alabama and Mississippi.

01-19-12  03:39pm

Reply
81
Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
(0)
Reply of BubbaGump's Reply

They did a really good job of making them look unstaged. Who knows?

01-18-12  07:11pm

Review
82
Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons: -Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line: This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.

Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.

More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.

The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.

My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.

01-18-12  03:11pm

Replies (4)
Reply
83
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I give positive ratings as encouragement. I want PU to grow.

12-03-11  04:46am

Reply
84
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Any time is a good time for porn.

12-03-11  04:45am

Reply
85
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely straight. If there are those that prefer men, that leaves more for me.

12-03-11  04:43am

Reply
86
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love nice legs. Sometimes when I look up, I am disappointed by her face, but give me great legs anytime.

12-03-11  04:42am

Reply
87
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
Reply of otoh's Review

I really loved your review. This is a site I would consider and your details about it were truly informative.

12-03-11  04:40am

Reply
88
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

I find it interesting that you mentioned some bizarre scene cuts. I have been a member of similar sites and find that how they shoot the scenes kills the eroticism. The scenes jump around in their focus so much that it is hard to get into the action.

12-03-11  04:26am

Reply
89
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of Anonymous64's Review

Awhile back I had a bad experience with them, but recetnly signed up for the three day trail. Everything was fine, including the billing.
If you like the content, the site is good.


12-03-11  04:20am

Reply
90
Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines
(1)
Reply of Cybertoad's Review

I have never gotten into this niche, but you sure make it sound interesting.

10-03-11  08:17am

Reply
91
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have, but with mixed results. Some respond. Some respond with sarcasm and most ignore me.

10-03-11  08:11am

Reply
92
N/A Reply of gggfan's Poll

I pick Germany and Japan. They have more wild over the top content than I have seen anywhere.

10-03-11  08:07am

Reply
93
Visit American Bukkake

American Bukkake
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

Interesting review. I love the level of details. I was a member a while back and liked the site, but did not love it. I can agree with a rating of 69.

10-03-11  08:02am

Reply
94
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

I would chose strippers. I know I can't touch, but hookers are just too mechanical for me.

10-03-11  08:01am

Reply
95
Visit Cosplay Deviants

Cosplay Deviants
(0)
Reply of AlexMercer's Review

Nice try for a first review. But, your cons are huge and I can't see such a high score being justified without the ability to download. For me, that alone is a dealbreaker and would never join.

10-03-11  07:59am

Reply
96
Visit Tainster

Tainster
(1)
Reply of Jaimes's Review

I appreciate that we don't have identical tastes. One thing I have always liked about PU is that we are openminded regarding what we like. Calling CFNM or extreme bondage as sick is just not what I expect to see on PU, sorry. As for your characterization of "sick and stupid sites that feature Bukkake, C.F.N.M, or worse" is just not something that is right. To each his own is a much better philosophy. Please don't take my comments to mean your views are not welcome, just don't be judgemental regarding taste.

07-31-11  03:27pm

Review
97
Visit Only CFNM

Only CFNM
(0)

65.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Bill through CCBill.
-Part of network of fetish websites, hardglam.com. Many have similar themes.
-Has three choices of video downloads. The best is HD at 1920x1080, 10378 kbps. Excellent. There is a lesser quality download at 854x480, 927 kbps and FLV streaming.
-Photos are zipdownloadable at 1900x1262 and at 1200x797. Most sites do better, but these are acceptable.
-No download limits.
-Works with download managers.
-Delicious English accents.
Cons: -Apparently not updating any longer. Presently has 27 videos, TBP has them at 25 in June of 2009. Another review site has them at 25 in May of 2010.
-Zero search capability. Listed in what I guess was date order only, but without any dates posted.
-I found the concept of a fetish within a specialized niche to be a bit strange, as well as hard to get used to. See below.
-Practically no plot, almost gonzo. Other CFNM sites I have joined have plots that make the action have a sexy context. You don't get nudity, so at least I expect my imagination to get stimulated.
Bottom Line: I have previously been a member of two other CFNM sites that I rather enjoyed. On those sites what I appreciated were sexy ladies doing for fun what on most gonzo type sites are done for male pleasure. For example, why would a woman suck a guy's cock while fully clothed, except that she really wants to do it? After all, he is doing nothing for her. Usually the women seem to be enjoying themselves. Further, a sexy woman in hot clothes gets my imagination going.

What about on this site? Zero imagination. The pretext for the action is usually so weak that it is just unbelievable. This is not fantasy, it is just gonzo, straight to the blow job sex. I like blow jobs as much as the next guy, maybe more so, but every video is the same. Besides that, the content available is just too little. At least if they were updating, you could see the site improving. Only two updates in close to two years is pathetic.

The next problem area came as a surprise. The reason I joined was that I like blow jobs, especially in top quality HD. However, nearly all the videos have the women smoking before, during and after the bj. Its bad enough I had to get used to shaved women in porn, but smoking? I tried, but I simply can't get used to it. I could never have sex with a woman who smoked, even if not in front of me. Smoking is a dirty, unhealthy habit that makes a woman smell and is not at all sexy, sorry. I did not realize how strongly I felt on this topic until this site. I kept telling myself, focus on the bj, focus on how hot the women are, etc. I like a lot of niche, even fetish material, but this site reached my limit.

A fetish within a niche website most definitely limits its market. No wonder this is an archive site.

07-31-11  08:05am

Replies (2)
Reply
98
Visit Net Video Girls

Net Video Girls
(0)
Reply of nastytodd's Review

How is the video quality? I see that in the past it was not much, like 320x240, split into segments.

07-21-11  11:25am

Reply
99
Visit Devils Film

Devils Film
(1)
Reply of rearadmiral's Review

I am sorry I missed it, but congratulations on getting 100 points.

07-21-11  11:12am

Reply
100
Visit Alain Lamas

Alain Lamas
(0)
Reply of manholelover's Review

The negatives here are mostly the same as those on heterosexual solo sites. Lack of updates, poor quality, lack of interactivity. Most of us here at PU feel that solo sites are usually not that great, as well as usually overpriced for what you get. Personally I like sites that have some theme or at the least a little unusual.

07-21-11  11:11am


Shown : 76-100 of 1188 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.86 seconds.