Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (358)  

Feedback:   All (1163)  |   Reviews (177)  |   Comments (131)  |   Replies (855)

Other:   Replies Received (692)  |   Trust Ratings (87)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 1174 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
51
Visit Bound Gangbangs

Bound Gangbangs
(0)
Reply of elephant's Review

I have joined several kink sites and like the sex. Our tastes differ, but you mentioned the high production values. That is very true. Also, they are top notch in customer service. If you like their material, no other sites can compare.

02-22-12  11:53pm

Reply
52
N/A Reply of Denner's Poll

I put no. It doesn't interest me and I have never joined a network that included a gay site.

02-22-12  11:50pm

Reply
53
Visit African Goddesses

African Goddesses
(0)
Reply of Capn's Reply

Thank you for your nice words. It is always a pleasure to hear from you.

02-22-12  11:49pm

Review
54
Visit African Goddesses

African Goddesses
(0)

80.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Beautiful African models. Some are thin, but most are amazingly voluptuous with beautiful faces and extra large breasts. Nothing fake or artificial here.
-Amateurs. All the models appear only on this site.
-The videos are nearly all stripping from either lingerie or ethnic African outfits. Very exotic.
-No DRM
-Works with download managers
-No interviews. The models don't even speak. The videographer is never in the video nor do you hear them.
-The models look directly at you and don't ever look bored, jaded or mechanical.
Cons: -Billing is through an unusual biller and no billing choices are available.
-Your password is sent to you at your email address. This concept worked, but every time you log in, you must reenter the password.
-The photos are small at 1024x768.
-No zipdownload option.
-The picture sets are small. Most are less than 50 photos, some as few as 10.
-The videos download, but with only one option. They are in WMV 640x480, but reasonably sharp considering they are not HD.
-Barely updating. See below.
Bottom Line: This site is of softcore photos and stripping videos of natural African women. The focus is on some of the most beautiful women on the planet.

I was last a member in August of 2008. In the nearly three and a half years that have passed, I have found my appreciation for the videos has remained. I really want to love this site as its content is wonderful.

How can I describe its contents? I love what they have. The women make the site. However, there is no sex, not even masturbation. The nudity is very tasteful, something like Playboy style. Tease is a key word here. Personally, I would prefer a litle more explicitness, but the site is made so that it leaves some to the imagination.

However, it has some very serious negatives. The worst is that it almost is a zombie site, with only three updates in 2011 and three in 2010. In the past, there were 11 in 2009, 16 in 2008, 20 in 2007 and 22 in 2006.

Further, the video quality is only 640x480. They were watchable, but I hope for better. The photos are also out of todays expectations, coming in at 1024x768.

I get the feeling that the site's owners don't care much about making the site better.

I would definitely recommend the site if you love this type of content. However, I waited three and half years between sign ups and the site is almost the same with about 20 updates. I can't see joining in less than another few years.

02-22-12  11:38am

Replies (7)
Reply
55
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think I am pickier, but that comes form having seen a ton of porn over many years. I am think I am more knowledgeable as a result.

02-12-12  09:15am

Reply
56
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I rarely find any interesting. If they were well done, but usually they are not.

02-12-12  09:13am

Reply
57
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I usually consider it over a few days. I read reviews, but often choose sites that others have not reviewed.

02-12-12  09:11am

Reply
58
Visit Oldje

Oldje
(0)
Reply of selphy's Review

Considering about 250 quality videos are on the site, I would have no complaints. That is a lot, when you take into account that this is a niche that is catered to by very few sites. While I have not joined this site, by its reputation and your positive comments, I am sure I would give it a higher score.

02-12-12  09:07am

Reply
59
Visit Josh Girls

Josh Girls
(0)
Reply of foxtails's Review

I reviewed the site a while back. At that time it did not have a link to write to the webmaster. I found his email through PU and he never addressed my problem. A video had a glitch in it and broke at an interesting point. I downloaded it five times with no better results. He never wrote back.

I also thought that the videos would be better with more stretching and a bit more of the explicit.


02-12-12  09:01am

Reply
60
N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

I have given kink sites that are new some high scores as well. Knowing their reputation, I expect that with more updates the quality will remain high. As a rule, you cannot predict that with other new sites. Some update rarely and may never keep up the intial quality, so I checked NO.

02-12-12  08:58am

Reply
61
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not at all. I think pregnant models do not have a place in porn.

01-19-12  03:44pm

Reply
62
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. I often go with no more than a 1280x720 becasue of file size. Midrange HD is fine for me.

01-19-12  03:43pm

Reply
63
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The content is much more important, but I do care. If a webmaster is concerned about customers, I consider it a big plus.

01-19-12  03:42pm

Reply
64
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

None. You pay for the site and should be able to do whatever you want as far as downloading. If the site has a problem, they don't get any sympathy from me.

01-19-12  03:41pm

Reply
65
N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Hate them. I think they are a waste of time and not worth viewing.

01-19-12  03:40pm

Reply
66
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Former President Bush thought that Central America was places like Ohio and Indiana and South America included Alabama and Mississippi.

01-19-12  03:39pm

Reply
67
Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
(0)
Reply of BubbaGump's Reply

They did a really good job of making them look unstaged. Who knows?

01-18-12  07:11pm

Review
68
Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
(0)

85.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons: -Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line: This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.

Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.

More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.

The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.

My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.

01-18-12  03:11pm

Replies (4)
Reply
69
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I give positive ratings as encouragement. I want PU to grow.

12-03-11  04:46am

Reply
70
N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Any time is a good time for porn.

12-03-11  04:45am

Reply
71
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely straight. If there are those that prefer men, that leaves more for me.

12-03-11  04:43am

Reply
72
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love nice legs. Sometimes when I look up, I am disappointed by her face, but give me great legs anytime.

12-03-11  04:42am

Reply
73
Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
(0)
Reply of otoh's Review

I really loved your review. This is a site I would consider and your details about it were truly informative.

12-03-11  04:40am

Reply
74
Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
(0)
Reply of dracken's Review

I find it interesting that you mentioned some bizarre scene cuts. I have been a member of similar sites and find that how they shoot the scenes kills the eroticism. The scenes jump around in their focus so much that it is hard to get into the action.

12-03-11  04:26am

Reply
75
Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
(0)
Reply of Anonymous64's Review

Awhile back I had a bad experience with them, but recetnly signed up for the three day trail. Everything was fine, including the billing.
If you like the content, the site is good.


12-03-11  04:20am


Shown : 51-75 of 1174 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 1.62 seconds.