Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : mbaya (356)  

Feedback:   All (1159)  |   Reviews (176)  |   Comments (130)  |   Replies (853)

Other:   Replies Received (688)  |   Trust Ratings (87)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 51-75 of 1170 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I think I am pickier, but that comes form having seen a ton of porn over many years. I am think I am more knowledgeable as a result.

02-12-12  09:15am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I rarely find any interesting. If they were well done, but usually they are not.

02-12-12  09:13am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I usually consider it over a few days. I read reviews, but often choose sites that others have not reviewed.

02-12-12  09:11am

Visit Oldje

Reply of selphy's Review

Considering about 250 quality videos are on the site, I would have no complaints. That is a lot, when you take into account that this is a niche that is catered to by very few sites. While I have not joined this site, by its reputation and your positive comments, I am sure I would give it a higher score.

02-12-12  09:07am

Visit Josh Girls

Josh Girls
Reply of foxtails's Review

I reviewed the site a while back. At that time it did not have a link to write to the webmaster. I found his email through PU and he never addressed my problem. A video had a glitch in it and broke at an interesting point. I downloaded it five times with no better results. He never wrote back.

I also thought that the videos would be better with more stretching and a bit more of the explicit.

02-12-12  09:01am

N/A Reply of RustyJ's Poll

I have given kink sites that are new some high scores as well. Knowing their reputation, I expect that with more updates the quality will remain high. As a rule, you cannot predict that with other new sites. Some update rarely and may never keep up the intial quality, so I checked NO.

02-12-12  08:58am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Not at all. I think pregnant models do not have a place in porn.

01-19-12  03:44pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Yes. I often go with no more than a 1280x720 becasue of file size. Midrange HD is fine for me.

01-19-12  03:43pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

The content is much more important, but I do care. If a webmaster is concerned about customers, I consider it a big plus.

01-19-12  03:42pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

None. You pay for the site and should be able to do whatever you want as far as downloading. If the site has a problem, they don't get any sympathy from me.

01-19-12  03:41pm

N/A Reply of Drooler's Poll

Hate them. I think they are a waste of time and not worth viewing.

01-19-12  03:40pm

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Former President Bush thought that Central America was places like Ohio and Indiana and South America included Alabama and Mississippi.

01-19-12  03:39pm

Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt
Reply of BubbaGump's Reply

They did a really good job of making them look unstaged. Who knows?

01-18-12  07:11pm

Visit HQ Upskirt

HQ Upskirt

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.
Cons: -Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.
Bottom Line: This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.

Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.

More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.

The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.

My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.

01-18-12  03:11pm

Replies (4)
N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I give positive ratings as encouragement. I want PU to grow.

12-03-11  04:46am

N/A Reply of Cybertoad's Poll

Any time is a good time for porn.

12-03-11  04:45am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

Definitely straight. If there are those that prefer men, that leaves more for me.

12-03-11  04:43am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I love nice legs. Sometimes when I look up, I am disappointed by her face, but give me great legs anytime.

12-03-11  04:42am

Visit Girls Out West

Girls Out West
Reply of otoh's Review

I really loved your review. This is a site I would consider and your details about it were truly informative.

12-03-11  04:40am

Visit Dancing Bear

Dancing Bear
Reply of dracken's Review

I find it interesting that you mentioned some bizarre scene cuts. I have been a member of similar sites and find that how they shoot the scenes kills the eroticism. The scenes jump around in their focus so much that it is hard to get into the action.

12-03-11  04:26am

Visit German Goo Girls

German Goo Girls
Reply of Anonymous64's Review

Awhile back I had a bad experience with them, but recetnly signed up for the three day trail. Everything was fine, including the billing.
If you like the content, the site is good.

12-03-11  04:20am

Visit Fucking Machines

Fucking Machines
Reply of Cybertoad's Review

I have never gotten into this niche, but you sure make it sound interesting.

10-03-11  08:17am

N/A Reply of Khan's Poll

I have, but with mixed results. Some respond. Some respond with sarcasm and most ignore me.

10-03-11  08:11am

N/A Reply of gggfan's Poll

I pick Germany and Japan. They have more wild over the top content than I have seen anywhere.

10-03-11  08:07am

Visit American Bukkake

American Bukkake
Reply of dracken's Review

Interesting review. I love the level of details. I was a member a while back and liked the site, but did not love it. I can agree with a rating of 69.

10-03-11  08:02am

Shown : 51-75 of 1170 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.38 seconds.