Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Jennifer2 (0)  

Feedback:   All (5)  |   Reviews (2)  |   Comments (0)  |   Replies (3)

Other:   Replies Received (5)  |   Trust Ratings (0)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Reply
1
Visit Brazzers

Brazzers
(0)
Reply of aibohphobia's Review

Thank you for the warning. It’s too bad the pay-for-porn model is becoming so scammy. Hopefully, people will just stop giving their money to sites like that. They don’t deserve it.

02-08-20  06:14am

Review
2
Visit Hot Guys Fuck

Hot Guys Fuck
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * No scammy hidden extra charges for downloads
* Nearly all footage shot in 60P
* Women are more "girl next door" types (if that's a pro to you)
Cons: * Downloads can be a bit slow at times. Not terrible- About 10-15 minutes avg per video with my 100Mbps service.
* A few of the videos throw up server errors.
Bottom Line: There is a lot of emphasis on the guy in these videos (of course!) but I watch it for the women. There isn't a huge selection of women but the ones they have are super sexy, IMO. The less makeup and fake eyelashes and fake moaning, etc, the better. Definitely an amateur feel to the videos, but in a good way!
If you're into guys, especially young and fit guys, you'll like it even more than I do.

09-14-19  05:00pm

Replies (1)
Reply
3
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of mike55q's Reply

Yes, the ads are ridiculous. They're everywhere. I do notice quite a few of the older 2000-2010 videos are missing from their series'. They have also tried to convert some the older ones to the 16:9 aspect ratio. The way they did it they stretched everything out. It looks insanely unnatural. Or they crop out the top and bottom of the video like exploitedteens.com. Looks like they shot the footage with a telephoto lens. Such a shame. That site butchered some great footage. I say just leave them in the 4:3 ratio in which they were shot. So much better. Oh, well.

09-14-19  04:13pm

Reply
4
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)
Reply of merc77's Reply

I hear you. I'm happy to pay for things when I know what I'm getting. At least I found this site so I can make better informed decisions going forward.

08-06-19  07:13pm

Review
5
Visit Reality Kings

Reality Kings
(0)

50.0
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Some of the best footage anywhere.
*Good use of links to find what you're looking for.
*Thumbnails animate to give a good representation of video contents
*Overall, good site design
Cons: First, they pre-check a box on signup to get you to spend more money on a site you don't want. A lot of adult sites do that. It's a sleazy business practice, but what do you expect? It's porn.

They currently charge $15/mo for downloads and don't tell you that when you sign up.

Downloads average 150kbs. Not a typo. You get about 1MB every 6 seconds. I'm able to download about 5GB/day. My connection to my ISP runs between 90-100mbps. It is by far the worst downloading experience I have ever experience on any website on the internet. Yes, I have contacted the ISP, reset my modem and router multiple times. No change regardless of time of day/night, etc.
Bottom Line: If they can't afford to deliver downloads, they shouldn't offer them for sale. There's no wonder there's so much piracy of their videos; if you pay RK money, they punish you with terrible service.

I give it a 50 because they give you speeds not much faster than you could get with a dail-up modem over a telephone line in 1996 and charge you for the privilege. I'll never be back.

I realize bandwidth is not free, so if there's a DL limit, tell the user. I'd be happy to update the score if speeds show even a marginal improvement.

08-05-19  08:19pm

Replies (8)

Shown : 1-5 of 5  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.06 seconds.