| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
1
|
X-Art
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Pros : beautiful models, some of which are the sexiest I have seen in some time. Lily has to get a mention as one of their top models and her videos set is such high quality even if it is very short.There are now 63 very sexy models with photo sets available in 3 sizes. |
| Cons: |
Photo quality is totally inconsistent and in many cases very poor consisting of soft or over exposed photos. For HQ photos there is very little detail.
The videoes are too few and again not all of the same high quality as Lily's. They are also very short appprox 3min in duration. |
| Bottom Line: |
I as a picture lover fail to see how other reviewers can score this a 95 which puts it in the same bracket as MET ART, Hegre, Femjoy etc which it clearly is not. I have seen photos on all these sites where you can see the very hairs on the models arms and the goose pimples from a cold room used for the photo shoot. These are not of a similar quality nor is there the same volume of models and photos. Bottom line very sexy models but they are being done an injustice. Improve the quality of the photos and this could bea top site but not yet. |
|
02-06-10 07:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
2
|
Zemani
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Regular updates and the models are both numerous and generally gorgeous. You only have to go to the samples or look at the models thumbs to see the quality of the models.
Pics available in 3 sizes with the largest being 4000px. There is a settings section which among other things allows you to choose a default size that each thumbnail will open at. |
| Cons: |
Inconsistent quality of the photos. There are far to many poor quality pictures. My main interest is pictures rather than video and in this area I was greatly disappointed. There is too many out of focus / soft and badly photoshopped pictures. Kate (sentiments) being a perfect example of grainy photos and not what you would expect from a high quality photo shoot.
The videos are only vailable in AVI and being honest I have nly downloaded 2 so far and both are not of a quality I would have expected. I can only assume they were videoed hand held by someone that hasn't the steadiest of hands. But please bear inmind I have only checked a small sample of those available. |
| Bottom Line: |
Not for me. I have been here less than a week and am already choosing which site to go to next.
The models are some of the best I have seen but generally speaking unfortunately the photographers have let them down either in the photoshoot or in their use of photoshop. I Would much rather see smaller sets of photos and even lower resolutions if the quality could be improved upon. But make your own mind up as the free HQ samples are typical of the members. |
|
02-06-10 06:50pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
3
|
Rookie Babe
(0)
|
|
07-16-09 12:58pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
4
|
Met Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Huge selection of models far too many to get through in one month. So they have helped you chose with sections such as best of Met and an advanced search with 12 search options.With such a huge choice there really has to be something for everyone no matter what your taste.
Models have generally multiple photosets with pictures ranging from high 3328x4992
to low resolution around 768x1024
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model and you get usually 4 updates per day including regular additions of new models.
Movies are streamable and downloadable in a number of options including ipod,Divx, mpeg,real player. With the recent movies being of a much better quality than when I was a member 1yr ago and are now generally HQ 1280x720
There is also a free cam section which is worth a mention but cant comment as I have yet to check it out. |
| Cons: |
The Cons and where they lost the 10 points.
I was amazed at the difference in the quality of the photo sets from one photographer to the next with complete sets ruined with grainy and soft photos. As an example one great model VALENTINA A has a photo set NASCOSTA BY INGRET which is 9th Dec 2008 and the photo quality is terrible. Most photos are soft, grainy and lack sharpness. Compare this to the same model VALENTINA A SPLASH BY RYLSKY 25/10/08 and VALENTINA A
SPRINKLE BY RYLSKY 25/01/07 where the sets are of a much higher quality and so much sharper. You would think quality would improve as time went by yet earlier sets are in some cases much better than the updates and this is not the only example there are many more. Personally I would rather see less updates and maintain the quality. I did of course send them an email but it was never answered. The movies as mentioned are HQ but can be pretty boring and are really a movie of the photoset. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line I had hope after rejoining a year later things would have improved but the photo quality of some photographers has never been addressed and I will wait some time before considering rejoining.
Otherwise it still has one of the largest photo sets to choose from and deserves to be in the top 10 though not necessarily as high as their current rating. They really need to address the quality of some photographers and if they don't sites such as torridart will soon start to give them serious competition as they grow in size and develop their photo sets. |
|
12-09-08 06:29am
Replies (1)
|
Review
5
|
Torrid Art
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
As a photo lover I just had to try this site and was not disappointed. There are some great models. Natural Looks. No airbrushing you get the totally natural look blemishes and all.
HQ photos ranging from 600 - 4000px and rarely with an option below 3000px. Photos available as a zip option. Search options include jump to model, search by hair color, search by category though this feature could be extended. You also have the option to vote for fav models. |
| Cons: |
The main downfall has to be the small number of updates. Last month was a total of 9 updates. Also total number of models is currently only 53 and they don't yet have large individual numbers of photo sets (on average 6 sets per model)with an average of 50 photos per set though some do go higher. The occasional photset is not quite to the standard you get used to on this site but it is the exception. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line is that for photo lovers wanting natural looking girls where the photos are HQ and not touched up like so many other sites then you have to give this at least a 1 month trial. Not everyone will appreciate the natural photos which includes the odd stretch mark or spot which is air brushed out on most other sites but personally I felt it added to the individuality of the models. They weren't the all too often waif like models all fully shaven. This was more the girl next door type and trims were more common than most sites which was a bonus for me. Finally price wise I felt that it was slightly overpriced given the small number of models / photo sets and updates but no regrets on joining and will probably revisit in about a year when they have more updates. Sooner if they were more frequent. |
|
11-24-08 04:28pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
6
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
How I got to the 2 day trial.
From the MET ART home page http://www.met-art.com/ select the sign up tab at the top of the page. Taking you to the following page http://signup.met-art.com/full.htm at the bottom of the page click on “click here to purchase our combo membership, up to 3 MET sites at a lower rate”. Takes you to this page
http://signup.met-art.com/combo.htm
Tick the box for MET models only and do not make a combo selection. Click submit and the options include a 2 day trial for $6.99.
|
11-24-08 03:46pm
|
Reply
7
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
The trial is still available. Go to the combination option on the sign up page but only tick the box for MET Models. You get a 2 day trial option.
http://signup.metmodels.com/mm_trial.htm?
|
11-23-08 03:48pm
|
Reply
8
|
Nubile Art
(0)
|
Reply of
nubileart's Reply
will try to get something off tonight or tomorrow
|
12-21-07 11:14am
|
Reply
9
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nubileart's News
much preferred Irina bath time she is a super model more of her please
|
12-21-07 06:40am
|
Review
10
|
Nubile Art
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Cheap membership
High resolution photos
regular updates
Many sexy models |
| Cons: |
Most photos appear to have been touched up possibly airbrushed removing detail such as skin texture and spoiling an otherwise very sexy photo.
Many high resolution photos also contain a lot of noise.
Small photo sets approx 45 per set
small video selection |
| Bottom Line: |
I initially thought this was a site that once it grew would be well worth a revisit but after just a few visits I feel despite the low membership price it needs a lot more work to make it worthwhile. I feel it does more wrong than right at the moment and Maggie has over rated it at 82.5. The potential is there but changes are needed not just growth in way of phot and video sets. |
|
12-21-07 06:36am
Replies (2)
|
Review
11
|
LSG Models
(0)
81.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Recent photos are of high quality up to 3000 pixels and well referenced with model name and set number.
Each photo set is around 40 photos which isn't the largest of files but most files include some nice close up with emphasis recently appearing to be quality not quantity but if thats truely the case a bump to 4000pixles would be nice.
Excellent search facility which includes ability to search by model name, age, nationality, hair colour, shaved and several other options.
Many sexy models |
| Cons: |
Older photo sets are numbered from 001 to last photo number. This of course means the next set you look at is numbered identically and when you save the photo you get the old "this file already exists do you wish to replace it" message when in fact it is a different photo. This problem has been corrected in the newer sets as mentioned above but it really is an annoying and very basic problem that could easily have been avoided.
The 2 Watermarks per photo is un-necessary videos slightly grainy. |
| Bottom Line: |
Just a bit slightly expensive for a site that is still growing and has still a small number of models and photo sets.
There are obvious attempts to improve the site such as changing the photo set numbering and higher quality photos.
I think it is still over rated when listed as excellent and would personally rate it very good with the potential to be an excellent site in about 6 months or so once the site grows and there is a bigger choice. That said there is already some very sexy models here and I will probably be back sometime in the future to see how it has grown. |
|
11-29-07 01:08am
Replies (0)
|
Review
12
|
abbywinters
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Australian site with many photos and videos of very hot and young Australian women. A lot of these women are very natural and show pubic hair which is a nice change from the fully shaved models on most other sites. Also contains many sexy group shots. High quality photos and videos with lots of close ups. |
| Cons: |
A few more older women would be nice as some of these girls are really young. While the young models are reaally sexy this isn't a huge drawback but it gets a bit boring after a while
a variety in age of models and in what they do would help as scenes become repetative. |
| Bottom Line: |
large number of very hot Australian women,
These are real natural looking girl next door type models and that is a real turn on.
go for the 'gold' option even though it is more expensive you get a lot more models and videos
It is well worth the membership but is going to be a one time subscription site for many as it is very repetative unless they add more variety to the shoots and videos. Spoilt by the variety of models but bored by the repetitiveness of each shoot. |
|
11-27-07 05:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
13
|
VideoBox
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Well priced.
Lots of variety
You can edit the scene youself only downloading the amount you want.
Good Search Fucntion.
Many very high quality videos especially the recent additions. |
| Cons: |
Not many really.
Some of the loder dvd quality videos appear to be old versions enhanced and not of the same quality as some of the newer additions.
I did download 1 or corrupt files. But this was a very small percentage. |
| Bottom Line: |
It would be hard not to find something of interest so given the price and general quality of the videos well worth the membership. |
|
11-20-07 06:01am
Replies (0)
|
Review
14
|
Hegre Art
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Many beautiful models,
Daily photo updates,
Photos range up to 6000 pixles. No other site with photos of this quality comes to mind.
Huge archive of models. Unfortunately some of the best models are from the days before the 5 and 5000 pixles but even at lower resolution they are generally of a very high quality. |
| Cons: |
Softcore site and once you get over the quality of the photos it can towards the end of the month start to become boring. This is my 2nd time joining and I went back to sample the higher resolution pictures which I did become bored with after a short while. 4-5ooo pixels is more than enough if they spent the extra on improving the videoes which although good can vary in quality. |
| Bottom Line: |
If you want high resolution pictures then this is the place to go. The photos are high quality but can become monotonous after a while. Not my site of choice for videos and far to many fully shaved models. If you prefer the more natural look this may not be the site for you. |
|
11-20-07 05:43am
Replies (0)
|
Review
15
|
Only Cuties
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is a really hot site. It is quickly climbing the ratings and deservedly so.
Pictures are high Quality though there is slightly and I do mean slightly better available elsewhere. As for video quality it not only one of the best quality video sites I have been to for a while but the videos are highly erotic. |
| Cons: |
Cons ? not too many really. Could improve the picture quality more by introducing more quality close ups. They could add more hardcore to the videos. But all said it is an excellent site. |
| Bottom Line: |
Bottom line I took a chance with it and no regrets. If you want quality video then give it a go you won't be disappointed. |
|
11-18-07 03:17pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
16
|
Met Art
(0)
90.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Excellent quality for the price.
Huge database of very sexy models.
Easy to navigate.
Regular updates. |
| Cons: |
I was a little disappointed in the quality of some of the higher resolution pictures which seemed soft or in some cases to contain grainy elements.
Too many fully shaved models I prefer to see more trimmed or unshaven. |
| Bottom Line: |
Well deserves a top 10 place but not sure it should be ahead of some of its rivals such as Hegre |
|
11-18-07 03:02pm
Replies (0)
|
