Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : LAmahogany (49)  

Feedback:   All (48)  |   Reviews (34)  |   Comments (3)  |   Replies (11)

Other:   Replies Received (18)  |   Trust Ratings (25)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-25 of 49 Page :    Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
N/A Reply of Denner's Reply

Tell me about it. When I'm with the Mrs., ceiling fans are suddenly the most interesting objects in the known universe. ;-p

07-06-10  03:14pm

N/A Reply of Duante Amorculo's Poll

There is already a form of porn for women. It's called reality TV shows.

09-01-09  11:26am

N/A Reply of Wittyguy's Poll

I've already performed on film. :-) I wish I could do it again but my fiancée is jealous as hell.

06-25-09  11:05pm

N/A Reply of PU Announcement on 06-15-07

I'm gonna be there! I will look for you guys.

06-16-07  09:23pm

Visit Adult Friend Finder

Adult Friend Finder
Reply of jd1961's Reply

The high'ish score was a result of the fact that though most men will understandably arrive at the inaccurate conclusion that an adult-oriented personals site might improve their chances... That is offset by two things: one, that women will get a lot out of the site (especially if they're just looking to get laid). And, second, the website technology in use is very, very sophisticated.

12-06-07  04:47pm

Visit Adult Friend Finder

Adult Friend Finder

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Finally, a personals site where you CAN upload your cock/body pics along with your normal pics
- Lots of media options (post pics, videos, etc)
- Very appealing site layout
- Very advanced (i.e., Flash-based chat)
- Lots to do (message boards, personals, etc.)
- You get to peep hotties as you're looking for the next honey to tap
- Way cheaper than other sites not even aimed at those looking for a booty call
- Cool ID verification system helps with "creepy anonymous guy" vibe abatement
Cons: - 99% of the pay ads placed by apparently attractive females turn out to be porno site traps set by male webmasters (or worse, escorts). The same goes for apparently attractive females contacting you, especially any non-bitchy replies
- Ads by real girls typically range from bitchy to extremely bitchy in tone.
- Many free female ads also from escorts/porn sites, especially those that created accounts actually yesterday.
- "Real" girls tend to post ads, and not sign in for weeks/months
Bottom Line: There are more cons as well, like, nobody hot tends to be within 1,000 miles of where you live, and when they are, they don't want to chat with you, no matter how nice you try to be. There is SO much to do, you want to spend all your time trying to fill out the EXTENSIVE profile forms, questionnaires, and upload pics, videos, etc. but none of it really helps. Not even paying for that "Gold" highlighted ad placement.

I'd hate to say it, but, you are not getting laid unless you are a thick girl and you don't mind black guys, you're gay (or a bi girl). Doesn't matter what your ad says or doesn't say, doesn't matter how nice you are. You could totally get game in real life, and then be cold fish on here. I had a friend recommend the site to me because he got lucky with it, but AFF was a complete waste of time for me.

12-05-07  11:12pm

Replies (4)
Visit Beach Model

Beach Model

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Material excellently caters to voyeurs and fans of exhibitionist erotica - some of the beaches are occupied whilst the model becomes totally nude
- High quality, DRM-free videos with no bandwidth cap
- Lots of content
- Frequently updated
- Extremely attractive models
Cons: - Poor Image Gallery (more on this in the "Bottom Line")
- The music in the videos doesn't add to the atmosphere; it's just annoying.
- Overuse of Slo-Mo in the videos
- Some girls do not get completely naked
- VERY few girls get freaky; it's mostly posing (similarly to Bikini Dare but not quite as lacking in content of this nature).
Bottom Line: The girls are hot enough that it's definitely worth paying for a membership and getting a lot of the videos because they are a turn on, especially those on the beaches that are occupied while the model is getting naked. The camera work is not bad but again, the slo-mo gets old and the music is annoying. Since there is no dialog, there is no point in turning up your speakers for these. Most importantly, the image gallery is a problem. Lots of good quality pictures but spread out over sometimes more than a dozen individual web pages rather than a build-in automatic slideshow, or at least a way to download the gallery as one or more ZIP files (as Bikini Dare did). Hard to know what you want just by looking at the previous in all cases.

You wont like this site too much if you are looking for hardcore content; this material that is JUST over the Showtime/Cinemax "softcore" line, but fits snuggly into "Playboy TV" level of intensity. I would recommend this site for beginners that are looking for porn that is, while not too intense, still enjoyable. These girls are wearing bikinis and striking poses you will NEVER, EVER find in Sports Illustrated, Stuff, Gear, FHM, Maxim, etc.

I was signed up for at least two months, it was that good.

05-31-08  11:17pm

Replies (0)
Visit Bella Club

Bella Club

Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Content matches the pricing
- Hot ass Brazillian women wearing thong bikinis, lingerie and showing you their tits? Yes, please.
- SEXY as hell behind-the-scenes video
- Photo sets sometimes more risque than the video
- Caters to those with a foot fetish
- The follow-up photosets and videos really crank up your heartrate
- Beautiful settings
- Some of these models are so beautiful it will make your eyes pop
Cons: - NIGHTMARE picture navigation. This should be in a class on how not to write Javascript
- Lots and lots and lots of fake tits
- Many models sporting body hair here (arms, butt cheeks)
- Some are really tatted up
- A little less teasing, a little more straight-on asshole/labia
- Sometimes the video is slow to playback from the United States; there can be buffering
- The mobile site is, for all intents and purposes, totally and completely broken--the navigation basically doesn't work
- Browsing the models is hugely inconvenient; you should be able to sort by date at least
- Pointless blog and "extra" features (who's reading these silly articles?)
- Christmas photo sets are reliably awful
- Sometimes the feet featured in the foot showcase photo sets are nothing special
Bottom Line: Large swings in intensity from model to model; there are some that look like they are ready to fuck the camera man while there are others clearly too nervous to be doing this, barely able to lose the arm-bra. Some of the sets are just too posed with too much going on (all these different kinds of lingerie). The concept sometimes overpowers the content in some of the photosets. Nevertheless, many of the models are SUPER gorgeous and some of them get into some relatively nasty poses. The content here is just a bit hotter than mid-1990s circa Playboy, but even Playboy is getting more intense with assholes in some of their photo sets, so I'm not sure how this site is keeping its audience and growing it. I like the content because I like getting shocked and surprised by the occasional model willing to show a little lip, but if it was one penny more, I swear I wouldn't renew. The dirt cheap, annual subscription is the one reason why it would be worth signing up though. In the end, this would be a MAGNIFICENT site--in spite of its many flaws--if they just stepped it up a bit with the hotness and quit playing around with shadows and cleverly placed objects in front of the camera.

12-24-14  02:41pm

Replies (0)
Visit Bikini Dare

Bikini Dare

Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Maximize your money and look for "Bo" - she is one fiery model
- A little bit of masturbating! Hot models changing in and out of super skimpy bikinis
- Excellent image gallery; very talented photographers at work
- Videos are "behind the scenes" like so you get to see a lot of horseplay, models getting ready in between shots, taking direction, changing, etc.
- DRM-free video files; no annoying daily download limits
Cons: - Very little hardcore content
- Very, very short videos; highest quality videos are on the lower end of what can be had
- Highly repetitive after a while
- Low quantity of content
Bottom Line: Beach Model proved to be the better site; more erotic models, modeling in more public places. But still this is one of the pioneer micro-kini modeling sites that keep companies that make those kinds of bikinis in business so it's worth checking out. WAY hotter than anything you'll ever see on Showtime or Cinemax, or in any Maxim/FHM/Stuff/Gear/Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition magazine. There is no sex though, and only a tiny bit of masturbating. This would be what I would regard as beginner's porn--not too intense but still Highly enjoyable with enough material to keep the less experienced porn fan dazzled for a while.

05-31-08  11:25pm

Replies (0)
Visit Butt Lounge

Butt Lounge

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Female models are unbelievably good looking. I really mean it. You will Love seeing these girls naked just for their awesome bodies and sexy faces alone.
- Lots of pre-cum from a good looking dick.
- The occasional creampie!
- High subscription fee off-set by the fact that it provides you with access to all seven G. Piccaso websites.
- Some content shot in HD.
Cons: - Some video editing would have been nice. I realize it's gonzo POV, but we don't need to see the camera pointed at the floor while it's moved to and from the tripod.
- "G. Piccaso" is frightfully hideous and whines a lot in the editorial content of the site.
- Broken links, some videos you can download whole, some you HAVE to download the chunks separately.
- No option to buy on DVD
- No easy streaming option
Bottom Line: A steal when you consider how much content you're allowed to download and keep. I recommend being subscribed for a month, then not for a while, and then coming back again.

06-16-07  02:25pm

Replies (0)
Visit Chelsea Vision

Chelsea Vision

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Downloadable videos; fast downloads
- New content as of Fall, 2014
- New content is more explicit
Cons: - More of the same
- No apparent orgasm
- Appearance of key model has not improved
- Priced above the quality of the content
- Site navigation has not improved; no search, no streaming
- Poor photo viewer
- Page appearance plagued by 10-year old, outdated design
- "Webcam" feature remains saved videos; nothing live
Bottom Line: She's back! Around four years year, she was just starting to heat things up... Even selling a private collection of actually explicit videos but in 2013, she started doing full-frontal, penetration (with toys and fingers, vaginal only) in the videos, photos and webcam photos. On the downside, she's kept on larger appearance so unless you're into that, this won't be good news for you. Updates basically died off for almost a year, but in September, 2014, she came back and started delivering new vignettes. Unfortunately, they're now more of the same. Posing and masturbation. Still no men in the videos or photos. No ass play and she doesn't even appear to orgasm in the videos, although she gets wet at least. Diehard, loyalists will be happy to see the updates again, and I'm sure that's what's being counted on in order to get the subscription money flowing again, but I'm afraid that in the landscape of sites like this, it comes up short, and unless things change, the few remaining subscribers won't have much to remain subscribed for.

12-24-14  03:01pm

Replies (0)
Visit Chelsea Vision

Chelsea Vision

Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - It has taken more than four years, but the content is beginning to get a little more explicit
- The site is frequently updated enough to justify keeping a membership
- EXTREMELY fast website
- No DRM on the videos
- Sometimes you get a little extra out of the "webcam" stills
- High quality stills
- "Vintage" material might be more appealing to those that would prefer their models on the thinner side.
- So-so guest area
Cons: - Very little explicit content
- New content, while frequent, does not always include new video
- Priced the same as a hardcore site with softcore content
- Image gallery could use functionality enhancement
- "HD" videos are still grainy due to low megapixel 1-CCD camera system
- Sometimes, not much difference between webcam stills and other material, except grainier.
- Stills could use a little more variety
- If you like your models on the heavier side, the site is beginning to appeal to you.
- So-so guest area
Bottom Line: No matter how many times I decide to drop my subscription, I will check back, and see something that makes me sign up again. That's a good sign as very few other sites can get that kind of retention out of me. Over the years, you can see some differences in the model, but she is finally starting to venture past tedious jump cuts, awkward positions and hand movements. Nothing wrong with a strip tease so long as there is finally ever a pay-off and with the most recent video put out, I think we're finally there.

If you've taken a look at this site before, perhaps even as recently as last year, and decided you weren't interested, take another look. This site has not undergone any kind of major redesign or anything, but, honestly, that's never what it's needed. The improvements that have been made are being made to the "right" areas, and I think it's worth checking out. It's very unique content in that there are very few strip-tease sites out there, and one as totally captivating as this one.

Have patience with this one. chelseavision.com is coming around...

07-01-10  07:46am

Replies (0)
Visit Clips 4 Sale

Clips 4 Sale
Reply of james4096's Reply

Perfectly understandable. I think I spent 15 minutes deciding which video to buy because it is very easy to get them, yet they cost so much. They really should have a half-and-half system ala Columbia House (in the old days), pay a monthly membership fee of $9.95 and get the clips 50% off, or even, offer a "bulk" discount (buy 10 as a member, get each video for just $5). I think people would buy more (good for the producers) but it wouldn't be so expensive as to be not worth it.

The only way this site will work is with very niche, difficult-to-find content (creampies, slow hand jobs, pre-cum, bisexual, etc.) because if it descends to the level of the porn you can buy anywhere, then, no one will spend $10 on a 15 minute clip, for $10 more, you can buy a 4 hour DVD.

06-25-09  11:12pm

Visit Clips 4 Sale

Clips 4 Sale

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - HD-quality downloadable videos with no DRM
- Huge variety, lots of niche material
- Multiple ways to search for content
Cons: - The cilps are expensive ($10 for a 15 minute file)
- No way to create an account and save billing info (this can be a real buzzkill in certain "situations")
- Not the most modern looking website design I've ever seen
Bottom Line: WOW. That was my reaction when I found this site. I think I have been looking for over two years for a source of the kinds of stuff I'm into and this place finally has it. I ended up discovering it by accident looking at videos through a popular search engine site, so, clips4sale.com needs to really invest in some SEO. They can certainly afford it given how much they're charging for video clips. However, I've already purchased two. If they could offer some bulk-purchase discounts, I'd buy a lot more.

06-23-09  08:07pm

Replies (2)
Visit CrazySlutty.com

Reply of mvllscott's Review

I would also like to see other guys with the primary model. =) Opens up opportunities for things like D/P, oral+intercourse. Recent girl+girl addition a very good start, however.

06-20-07  07:43pm

Visit CrazySlutty.com


Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: - Key model is very good looking (you will never forget her smile, or her eyes), shaven, curvy
- She does it ALL (creampie, swallowing, toys, flashing, etc)
- She is nice and has a great sense of humor. Chats with her fans online and in the site bulletin boards.
- Not just pics but Audio as well (she sings a very sultry "Santa Baby" in addition to her phone sex-style erotic storytelling)
- Still photography features a highly professional look.
- Updates EVERY week.
Cons: - Early videos shot with a webcam, later videos are sharper but dark.
- Above average subscription fee.
Bottom Line: Fan interaction, content personalization through member request submission, THOUSANDS of pictures, every niche and fetish satisfied (including with artwork), and a variety of media (audio, video, and stills). Above average price, but an above average website. WAY above. And if you need proof for why you should sign up, look for teaser content at her blog at LiveJournal (a link to it is available from the website).

There is new girl-on-girl action on the site, and rumors of other never-done-before material to come. Very exciting stuff!

06-16-07  02:00pm

Replies (0)
Visit Creampie Models

Creampie Models

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Some of these girls are pretty cute
- Some individual videos are scorching hot!
- If you like black girls getting creampies, this is a good site to check out.
- Membership allows you to access a ton of other sites
- Supposedly newer videos can be downloaded whole without a DRM.
- Video quality is relatively good
- Cinematography of the single camera, camcorder variety but not annoying; decent amount of editing employed
Cons: - Membership to other sites off-set by the fact that each site only seems to contain a hand full of videos (maybe 5-10 per page, 10-15 pages PER SITE)
- At least one broken link encountered
- Annoying "step-through" clip playback on certain (I suppose older) girls showcased
- Sometimes seems to take a Long time for male models to orgasm--sometimes requiring a little jerking off
- "Amateur" section really takes you to adultfriendfinder.com, not (really) a porn site.
Bottom Line: You're getting a lot of for your money, when you consider all the sites, but each niche is relatively small, especially considering I felt 2 out of every 10 videos I came across were actually all that erotic. Some of these scenes had hot moments, but generally, I didn't see anything that made me think, "I can't wait until they post a new video!" Again, lack of male enthusiasm, no pre-cum, etc. didn't make me think I needed to stay subscribed. The site in general, to me, felt like it took a "bare minimum" approach: a table of pictures, links to videos (you're on your own if you want to stream, or automatically advance through the "cut up" videos). I don't think the site costs too much, it's just that with the advances in website design alone, this site doesn't stand up to its competition the way the teaser pages makes it seem like it should. I would say, check this out, and maybe come back in a few months--but I wouldn't remain a member on an on-going, month-to-month basis.

12-05-07  10:58pm

Replies (1)
Visit CreamPie.com


Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Teaser videos that get right to the point
- Great stills from the videos
- Not just videos, but also plenty of information too; tells you about other movies with creampie content. Connected to searchable database.
- Though not original, lots of hard to find content
Cons: - Short clips; have to piece them together yourself with software. Leads to the annoying side-effect that, every 30-60 seconds, videos stop to display the website URL, which is utterly annoying.
- Not a lot of content.
- Updates relatively infrequent
- Content not exclusive
- Video quality not always up to snuff.
Bottom Line: You're better off searching VOD websites for the "Cum in my Cunt" video series (or Randy West's "Please Cum Inside Me" line) in the long run because the most valuable thing this site offers, it has very little of (rare videos of well known adult actresses performing creampie videos).

Others may disagree, but it's more hot seeing actresses like Cheyenne Silver (someone notorious for doing condom-only scenes), Jill Kelly, Shay Sweet, Jenna Jameson, Australian Fox Jody Moore or Bridget Kerkove perform in such scenes than just anybody.

Nevertheless, besides VaginalCumshots.com, this site offers the most in the way of creampie videos. Being signed up for at least a couple of months to grab the goods seems worth it.

06-16-07  10:40pm

Replies (3)
Visit Dawn's Place

Dawn's Place
Reply of bjorn7's Comment

An unbelievable amount of her content has turned up on BitTorrents and is easily obtained from Kazaa and other file sharing systems, so DRM implementation is not surprising. This is why, however, sites should focus on updating more often than not. The stuff on the peer-to-peer networks tends to be several Years out of date, and newer, higher quality stuff with better material is more likely to be found at the originating site.

06-16-07  08:16pm

Visit Dawn's Place

Dawn's Place

No Review.
06-16-07  08:14pm

Visit Fantasy HD

Fantasy HD

Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Nice modern look and feel to the site
- Great video player with fast playback, very little buffering, quality video
- Downloads offered as well as streaming
- Good quality photo sets
- Many of the models are very sexy
- Pristine video footage including brilliant lighting and clean, beautiful backgrounds
- Good videography including stable shots instead of the usual CrazyCam (handheld extreme closeups)
- Not a whole lot of fake stuff (fake boobs, fake screaming)
- Hot sex, sometimes ending in creampies
- No condoms otherwise
Cons: - Low on updates
- Mostly straight sex with the normal position progressions; nothing unusual, no surprises
Bottom Line: FantasyHD.com is a part of the new school of Internet porn ushering the era of higher standards: better lighting, better editing, clearer, cleaner pictures with more beautiful models having sensual sex in elegant surroundings without intrusive, painful music, jarring camera angles. Billed female-friendly, or "couples friendly porn," FantasyHD is another site that focuses on the intense pleasure of the female instead of some guy on steroids speed fucking a bleached-blonde with fake tits, tats and a spray-on tan for 25 boring minutes. The one thing making it hard for me to keep paying for my subscription, nevertheless, is that the updates are coming FAR and FEW in between. I suppose you can't rush perfection, and you'd rather have a few scenes so hot that your dick will leak precum without touching it than to get week after week of weak sauce--pardon the pun. But at $25-$30 a MONTH, and thousands of sites out there, you Have to be able to deliver so perhaps they launched too soon. In spite of that, I plan on sticking around, and checking back for when they do upload that new video that gives me what I'm paying for.

12-24-14  03:12pm

Replies (0)
Visit Footjob Models

Footjob Models

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Access to a LOAD of other websites
- Hot, hot models
- Pro-Am Videography & Editing - nothing amazing, but not sloppy and annoying
- Sometimes there's a bit of oral and fucking to go with the footsex; some of the feet get licked, toes getting sucked. Way hot.
- You CAN download non-DRM'd (MPGs) of WHOLE videos (not just clips)
Cons: - You get access to a lot of websites, but each site only has a hand-full of videos.
- Many videos cut up into 15 segments you have to manually click through to advance
- Some broken links
- Some soft cocks, no pre-cum (obvious excitement), QUICK cuts to the male performers just jerking off onto the feet.
- Obnoxious misdirection (i.e. "amateur" section really takes you to adultfriendfinder.com, a personals site--not a porn site)
Bottom Line: Nothing special; I've seen lower quality videos, heard worse audio mixes, worse videography, but honestly I was bored. There were a few special videos, and, again, you get to try out all sorts of other sites, with different specialties. But none of them seemed to have very enthusiastic male models. Everybody seemed like they needed to work extra hard for an orgasm. It doesn't look good in porno, so, I wouldn't recommend this site to others. I was disappointed.

12-05-07  10:49pm

Replies (1)
Visit FTV Girls

FTV Girls

Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - STUNNING models
- Decent video quality with the last several years in HD
- Video player is good (quality video with little buffering and fast startup); the Scene Jump functionality in particular is greatly appreciated
- Boasts site portability across numerous devices (desktop, tablet, smartphone)
- Downloadable videos in appropriate formats (MP4 for your iPod, Android device, etc)
- Real-life situations (actual public settings, real strangers watching at times)
- Very few fakes (natural, truly "First Time Girl" models)
- Real orgasms including wet pussy
- Some models showcasing special talents (gymnastics, dance, yoga, karate)
Cons: - They flirted with hardcore but didn't go all the way with the old FTVx.com site redirecting to ftvgirls.com now; that said, they've kept around some of the boy-girl content, and some of it was passible but typical and nothing special
- Same situations over and over again
- Too much dildo/vibrator action for me
- Inadequate search
Bottom Line: These girls are unbelievably good looking. I'd been visiting the site or seeing pictures from it for four years before finally caving in and getting a subscription. I haven't been able to find a site with a more steady stream of this many incredibly good looking girls. That said, I really wish there was either more hardcore, or that the hardcore they had was better. Real boyfriends, creampie, etc. They're doing that now with some of the other sites of this higher quality. The settings do get old from time to time, but the situations and the girls as well as their reactions do keep things fresh enough that it doesn't too much matter, really. You will love how they will sometimes bring a girl back after years and see how much she's changed, grown, become different, or better. This is one site that really gives you your money's worth for a fan of "girl next door" types.

12-24-14  02:25pm

Replies (0)
Visit Hegre Art

Hegre Art

Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Decent video player that doesn't buffer much, plays back soon enough, with excellent, HD picture quality
- Decent sound quality on videos
- ULTRA high resolution photographs
- Convenient ZIP file collections
- iHegre mobile site works very well on tablet and smartphone devices
- Neat podcasting feature on both videos and now massage videos
- Genuinely sexually aroused nude models
- Some of the models are incredibly beautiful, just watching them get naked is joy enough in itself; especially Flora
- The scenes are getting more explicit (oral sex, again, by Flora, usually on Alex or Mike--EASILY worth the cost of subscription alone)
- The tantric massage videos are epic
- Some of the masturbation videos are better than others
Cons: - Photo sets ending cold after escalating well is a disappointment and, unfortunately, increasing in frequency
- Sometimes the content is boring or weird
- Some of the models are too thin, too plain
- Videos, particularly the massage videos, can take a long time to update
- New look and feel of the site is cluttered
- Picture navigation is getting dated
- Some of the masturbation videos are better than others
Bottom Line: I can't believe I haven't reviewed this site before, as I've been subscribed off-and-on for over four years, but here goes. Love it or hate it, Hegre-Art.com is one of a kind, with photo sets that I've been lusting after ever since the original baby-oil covered model graced my screen from a set I picked up from an old USENET Newsgroup over eight years ago. Before anyone else was doing it, erotic photographic artist Peter Hegre had been leading with way, shooting models with super-model level looks in the highest pixel dimensions of anyone on the Internet and, to this day, still leads the way, using an 80 megapixel camera to shoot some of the highest resolution, large format nude photographs not in print (although he does sell a book, as well as DVDs).

Before anyone else was shooting erotic massages, Hegre-Art.com was producing HOUR LONG tantra videos eventually cutting the length to more reasonable times, and letting us see the forbidden cum shot that was a big risk, even for Hegre. Fans stormed the comments section with angry "I am not gay!" comments, but fortunately, those have been far overcome by the rest of us celebrating the male-female sexual tension in the massage videos.

The photosets got hotter and hotter too, with numerous female models sporting obviously wet pussy. We even now get to see oral sex--but not in the way typical for porno sites. In the Hegre Art way... With all of the gorgeous cinematography they've offered over the years. Great light, clear pictures, clean settings, expert editing and quality audio. This is not a cheap site, and easily offers more than others that charge more.

The one problem the site suffers from is that it enters into months-long lull periods where the material just gets plain boring, and bland. You'll be riding high on super hot pictures photographed in Japan, male models unloading cum onto the sexiest European models in the world to amazing, tantric handjobs. And then you'll get these sets of overly posed, uninteresting models that are good looking, nude, and standing around on a cold set doing different things, wondering--what happened? The massage videos will slow down, or go cold. The films will go cold, and feature uninteresting attempts at being artistic.

So you, as I frequently do, will find yourself subscribing and unsubscribing. Constantly. Were it not for the inconsistency, you could set it and forget it but with the cutting edge, experimental nature of the site, sometimes to get those few hits, you're going to have to be patient with all of the misses.

12-24-14  03:41pm

Replies (0)
Visit Her Sweet Feet

Her Sweet Feet

Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Hot girls
- High subscription fee off-set by the fact that it provides you with access to all seven G. Piccaso websites.
- Some content shot in HD.
Cons: - Some video editing would have been nice. I realize it's gonzo POV, but we don't need to see the camera pointed at the floor while it's moved to and from the tripod.
- REALLY weird looking penis
- Sometimes masturbation is required for the money shot; a big disappointment.
- Broken links, some videos you can download whole, some you HAVE to download the chunks separately.
- No option to buy on DVD
- No easy streaming option
Bottom Line: I'm the biggest fan of foot fetish I know and I could not recommend you spend any time viewing the content at this particular website.

06-16-07  02:38pm

Replies (0)

Shown : 1-25 of 49 Page :    Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.85 seconds.