I have a few picture sets with a girl holding a guitar at the beginning of the set. I always feel like taking the guitar and hitting the photographer over the head with it because he put a big obstructive object between the model and the camera.
Well said. I don't mind paying more than I normally budget for porn if the content is exceptional in some way, or if I can get an exceptional value for the price. If you're looking for run-of-the-mill hardcore there are great values out there, but if you're looking for something else, you might have to pay more for good quality content.
It's a fine balance between "you get what you pay for" and "caveat emptor." That's why reading reviews of sites by others here at PU is so useful.
I really don't mind. I'm more concerned with samples that don't really reflect the real quality of the photography or the general level of explicitness of the subject matter. Hiding genetalia is also a common feature of Japanese porn, which I like, so it doesn't bother me much. I like eroticism more than luridness.
I am a picture guy, so sites without zipped sets will not get my business. I like the ability to make customized zip sets for download, but it is not necessary, I usually make my own custom picture files after a download anyway.
A lot of my friends collect porn, but none has the collection I do. We talk and joke about it a lot. It's not really taboo in my circle of friends, though it isn't something I shout from the rooftops. I use discretion.
Yes, but only once. The site was new and there were technical difficulties that kept the content from loading. I contacted customer support and they arranged for CCBill to refund my purchase. I went back and joined the site a few months later when the technical difficulties had been worked out. I was quite surprised it worked out, as I thought I was going to have to eat the loss.
Based on my experience, most girls prefer to shave "down there" nowadays. It doesn't surprise me that hairy models are hard to come by. But that is not the customers' problem. I had a very good rate at ATKHairy and waited and waited for an update from ATKryan (the webmaster)about the issue and canceled yesterday, and his explanation (it's hard to get hairy models, and more sets are coming in from abroad but delayed by customs) came today. Fantastic. Too late.
His problems getting models, again, is his issue. His customers were paying good money for good porn, and he wasn't delivering, and wasn't upfront and honest about why right from the start when it mattered most. THAT was what was wrong with ATKHairy--deliver the promised content or explain right away why you cannot do so for a brief period.
I've been a member of ATK Hairy for years, always coming back despite the changes ATK Hairy made in direction with the site (more all-over hairy girls and fewer with just hairy pussies). But recently the quality has slipped. There have been some troubling developments. Updates have been multiple sets of one girl, instead of the eight sets of different girls, and in one case, the girl didn't even have a hairy bush! Today's update recycled content from at least ten years ago and called it the "Latest Update." Please.
The membership of ATK Hairy is long-established, and many are ready to quit the site. Much as it pains me to say it, if you are looking for good hairy porn right now, this isn't the site you need to be looking at.
I too dislike the sasquatch look. I love the site, but its new focus on full body hair is disappointing to say the least. At least there are still some models who won't grow all their body hair out, but if I'm going to buy a site, I want to enjoy the vast majority of the content, not just one or two out of eight updates.
I keep coming back because I love Sean R's work. I keep searching for a site with comperable content, but can't seem to find one that doesn't put a toy between the camera and the model's lovely bits.
Some months ago I wrote to ATK Hairy's comments section with a comment about the refocus to an abundant amount of content with armpit and leg hair that has made it onto the site. Long time fans of the site remember that it once focused on hairy pussies and natural breasts. I received a prompt reply (kudos) stating that there is a wide variety of content and many photographers and models, each with a variety of body hair, which is true.
Sometimes you will find all updates with full body hair, sometimes all updates with only pussy hair. It varies. If you don't enjoy a range of hairy content, and cannot stand to see some leg and armpit hair, you should probably skip the site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
-the site claims over 1,500 models, 3 million photos and 5,500 videos and it is likely true
-8 photo and 3 video updates daily
-recent (after 2011) photos in 3 formats: standard (682 x 1024), Medium (1064 x 1600) and High (2000 x 3000)
-recent videos (after 2011?) in multiple download formats: Flash, WMV, HD MP4, SD MP4, and Mobile
-all natural-breasted models
-hairy models ranging from pubic hair only to hair grown out everywhere
-a range of photographers with different styles
-both soft and hard core content, but mostly soft core
-tour is very good in representing the content within the site
-custom downloads of photo sets available
-few toys (good to me)
-the quality of photography varies (some use too little or too much light, an out of focus shot in a set, etc.)
-most models are white, amateur girls (see bottom line)
-sets are repetitive
-some unattractive models (to each their own)
-some photographers talk during the videos (not just during the interviews)
A site I keep coming back to time and again for quality hairy porn. The stable of photographers with their different styles and models (Argentinian, British, Russian, and American are common) means there is generally something for every type of fan of hairy women. The exception is ethnic women. They have an ethnic section, with at least one set a day, but compared to the other 7 photo updates a day, it seems slim. Models run the gamut from "WOW!" to "Woof" but that is a personal preference for each porn user.
The delivery of content is first rate. There are multiple formats, and with custom downloads, I have no complaints there. I can't say if it supports Download Management software as I don't use it, but downloads were quick for me. Sorry folks.
Some photographers are repetitive in their sets. LIL uses the same white and black background that drives me up a wall over and over again. Sean R is a fan favorite on the site and a major contributing photographer who specializes in gynocological spread shots. But there is a photographer for most tastes among those whose work appears on the site.
Like all ATK sites, ATK Natural & Hairy is focused on teen and amateur girls in largely indoor solo shoots. Some lesbian and some hardcore B/G shoots are on the site, But mostly it is girls stripping naked and masturbating with or, more commonly, without, a toy.
In all it is a good site for anyone looking for cute, hairy models with minimal toy usage, and lots of them.
Thanks. I don't do many reviews, but I try to do thorough ones. I don't expect webmasters to reply to positive reviews, as they are usually pretty busy. There is a lot of work involved to keeping up a good website. It is nice that they generally respond if a PU community member has a problem.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
-1,000+ models, each with 4 or more photo shoots and videos
-if you can't find a stunner in this lot, you are dead.
-pics in three viewing and zip sizes
-videos in multiple download formats (MP4, MPG, WMV, AVI, Mobile) in up to 1080P HD quality
-you can preview all the content on the site
-excellent search function
-Model's Other Sites list
-generally one B/G (or one G/G) hardcore set per model
-some minor bonus content
-has models' niched content (boobs, ass, close-ups, legs) in seperate zips
-video and photo tags don't work properly
-not all models do the same range of content (some will only masturbate by hand, some use toys, some do hardcore)
-the search function doesn't search for some listed criteria (tans but not tanlines is a pet peeve)
-lots of toys
-most girls are thin Caucasians. If that's your thing, you're set, if not, too bad.
-large watermarks with girl's and site name
A well-run site with an incredible collection of hot teen content. Every Monday three new girls are introduced, and video and pics are added daily (usually three or four). Photography is almost uniformly good, clear and explicit, but sets are somewhat short (generally near 100 pics). Some of my favorite pics of all time come from this site. The videos are equally good in quality, and usually very arousing.
The models range from pretty to divine, but they are almost uniformly thin, white girls. There are some latinas and the occasional Asian, but black models are rare and far between. Most girls are shaved, have few tattoos, and have a freshness about them that is absent on some teen sites. The girls' content varies by model, but most do one B/G or G/G set and several solo sets, each shot in video and pics. Toy use is the norm.
This is one of my top sites for teen content, but it has some flaws. The tag system is a mess. The tags are listed for both video and photo sets, but you cannot click on the majority of them, and the hyperlinks do not work. Users determine the tags, but there is no vetting, so insipid tags are common. The photo sets are sometimes choppy due to their length, as they go from fully clothed to toy use in about 100 pics. The search function is generally excellent, but some search terms listed cannot be searched for. I love tanlines and it is listed as a seperate descriptor for models on their sets, but you cannot search for it. Annoying. Watermarks are too big. Toys are in almost every set. But the site gets ten things right for every one it gets wrong.
This site has almost uniformly beautiful models, well photographed, in a variety of formats. The tour shows a bit of everything on the site, so it is open and honest about what they have. And they have some stunningly good content in a well-designed site.
The site has an excellent FAQ on the tour. They are quite upfront about the fact that the video is streaming only. They go on to say higher price is to pay for the high quality of the videos and the HD photos. The videos and pics are indeed first rate. I enjoy the site a great deal, but as I said in my review, the cost and streaming only video make this a site that will only appeal to some. But you don't find many high quality bukkake sites with cute Japanese girls without mosaic. This is one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
-High quality uncensored bukkake videos and pictures without mosaics (no blurred out parts)
-47 videos viewable in Flash at 500kbps or 2000kbps
-Every video has a corresponding photo set that is also uncensored
-Picture sets in HD and are downloadable
-Cute Japanese girls
-a variety of bukkake styles (cum on face, cum on body, cum drinking, etc.)
-Content is searchable by Girl, Video, or Photo
-Updates are regular, with videos about once every week(?) and photos every 3-5 days; upcoming updates are posted with release date
-Billing through CCBill
-Video content is streaming only, no downloads
-Videos are broken into multiple smaller parts, usually 3-5 parts
-Videos are repetitious (explained below)
-Expensive at almost $40 a month
-No bonus sites
A site to watch very high quality uncensored bukkake videos, if you don't want to download them. Great uncensored pictures, too. But the video collection is small, and you can see it all in a few days, and the updates aren't very fast, I estimate a full scene in a month. The bukkake action is fantastic. A variety of styles is shown, but a lot of the videos have the same action just with different girls. The perfect storm of high price, no downloads, and multiple segments of flash video make this a lukewarm recommendation for all but the most fervent bukkake fans.
I still have not received your original response email as of this time. I did receive your latest email though. Chalk one up to the vaguaries of the internet. It has happened before (an email once took over a month to be delivered), and it was impossible for me to discern a delay in delivery for a lack of response. I apologize, and will certainly not hold you to your offer of a free month's membership, though I thank you.
As befits Murphy's Law, I will likely receive your original response any time now...
I did not believe it was a con. It was a technical problem. That was why I wrote the help center and submitted a ticket as it requests. But I never received a reply. Nothing. This is the first time I have been contacted by your site's help center. I appreciate the offer of a free month, and will take you up on it, but you would have made a multi-month customer of me had you just replied to my ticket in the two days before the offer expired. I am just disappointed by the whole experience.
That's a terribly convoluted way to go about getting a discount. I applaud your tenacity. One would think you would simply follow the link that says "Join Here" as I did, but evidently not. I cannot test your method as the offer has expired. Thanks for the help.
Thanks for your suggestion, and I tried it, but it still did not bring up the 1/2 off offer. I am disappointed about not getting the offer, but more disappointed that no one bothered to respond to my email to customer service. It was polite and asked for them to help me get the 1/2 offer. If my email had been rude or vulgar, I could understand them not helping, but it was not. This was just bad customer service. I am very disappointed, especially as I have been a member several times and love their content.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.