Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : Doug (3)  

Feedback:   All (7)  |   Reviews (5)  |   Comments (2)  |   Replies (0)

Other:   Replies Received (6)  |   Trust Ratings (5)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Visit White Teens Black Cocks

White Teens Black Cocks

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Hot little white girls.
2. No download restrictions.
3. Most of the content is quality.
4. Girls get fucked hard the right way.
5. Movies in 2 formats: WMV and AVI.
Cons: 1. No zip files for photos.
2. Not a bunch of content.
3. Updates aren't regular.
Bottom Line: Pretty good site. If they updated at least once a week, they'd have a great site. Comparable to TryTeens and GirlsGotCream, some of the same girls, but different sex scenes.

05-30-07  04:07pm

Replies (0)
Visit Try Teens

Try Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Some very hot girls.
2. Clarity/resolution is getting better with newer updates.
3. A few hundred photos (plus vidcaps) per sex scene.
4. Good quality photos.
5. No download restrictions.
6. Includes access to a few other sites.
7. These girls get fucked hard and well.
Cons: 1. Updates aren't always regular.
2. Older content is fuzzy resolution.
3. No zip files for photos. Obviously they do this so you have to spend more time on their site.
4. Not a huge wealth of content available.
Bottom Line: Pretty good site over all. Comparable to their sister sites: girlsgotcream, whitegirlsblackcocks. Beware of the male "actor" who looks like a gorilla - he makes animal noises and is louder than the girls. Very annoying!

05-30-07  04:01pm

Replies (0)
Visit Teen Sex Movs

Teen Sex Movs

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Has some cute girls.
2. Gives you access to several other sites free.
3. No download restrictions.
4. Has zip files for photo galleries.
Cons: 1. Cameramen are terrible. Their bad camerawork ruins most of the videos.
2. Clarity/resolution of videos is poor.
3. Sex scenes are usually less than 15 min each.
4. Navigation is awkward.
Bottom Line: They seriously need to hire a steady-handed cameramen that doesn't shake and move around all the time if they expect this site to make much progress. Aside from the dozen cute girls on this and the companion sites, there's nothing of value here.

05-30-07  01:14pm

Replies (0)
Visit Barely Legal

Barely Legal

Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Hot girls.
2. Navigation is retarded.
3. Poor photo selection.
4. They make absolutely sure that you don't know what you're getting into, so you can't see how shitty this site is until you join!
Bottom Line: You'd think that a company like Hustler, with such a wealth of content, would make a site worth joining. But they protect their content like a mother grizzley bear, in fear that they just might give us our money's worth. This site is horrible and a huge ripoff. Hustler is greedy.

05-30-07  04:19pm

Replies (5)
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens

Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: 1. Some really hot girls.
2. Clarity/resolution is decent.
Cons: 1. The guy who films/fucks the girls is super-annoying.
2. His camerawork sucks.
3. He talks way too much.
4. He rarely gets the girls off, because he's too preoccupied with his own pleasure to fuck them right.
Bottom Line: Hot girls, terrible site. It's too bad that these girls chose to be on this site instead of a better one. If the guy shut up, then the site might be tolerable. He should fire himself and invest in 1) a competent cameraman, and 2) a dude who can actually please these ladies.

05-30-07  03:46pm

Replies (1)
Visit Sapphic Erotica

Sapphic Erotica

Good site, but needs much work done.

The homepage for sapphicerotica tells you what they offer, but there's no tour, no viewable updates, no model index, nothing to persuade you to join! The girls are hot, the lesbo scenes are great, but the site itself needs improvement. They should let you browse the site before you join, so you can see what girls/galleries/movies are offered, how often/what girls the updates are. I know it's specifically a lesbo site, but they could also shoot solo galleries. Even licensed solo stuff would be nice. Most of these girls can be found on other sites doing other stuff (sex, solo, etc).

05-30-07  04:33pm

Replies (1)
Visit Exploited Teens

Exploited Teens

You will be left frustrated!

There are a decent amount of hot girls here, but the guy who runs the site is so annoying that I can't stand watching any of these videos. He talks constantly throughout every film, bragging about his fictitious endowment. Also, he doesn't know how to fuck these girls very well. Most seem disappointed and left wanting. He spends more time with his dick in his hand than inside the girl, and it's usually limp. His camerawork shakes and moves around all the time. He is the true amatuer here, not the girls. If you want a great POV site with lots of hot chicks, look at bigmouthfuls.com

05-30-07  03:35pm

Replies (1)

Shown : 1-7 of 7  

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.66 seconds.