HD Porn Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 3 reviews. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Teens First Cream (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Network access
Movie available in segments or full length file
various quality options (including HD)
Nice selection of models & fresh faces |
| Cons: |
Not that much content yet (still a new site though)
trial membership access limted to certain content
content is similar to that from other site(s) |
| Bottom Line: |
This site seems to mirror the content offered by teensfilled.com, although the videos are edited differently as far as i can tell.
The content on offer is basically in the style of stuffedpetite.com, except we now have creampies instead of facials. Same guy, same set, same cute fresh teens taking a pounding!
The content offered is classic style pro-am content, which in todays reality soaked extreme porn settings is good to see.
The selection of models at the moment is not huge, but the models themselves are top notch (Alexis Love, Courtney James, Lexi Belle), and a mix of teen pornstars and up and comers. The scenes follow the classic formula and don't offer a huge variety.. but that's what most of us want from this style of proam stuff.
The scene with Alexis may be one of her best to be honest and was my main reason for joining.
The network access gives you some not bad sites, i'm not into trannies or blowjob only sites, but the milf site was pretty cool and had some hot models.
THe movie quality is up to todays standard, and is very sharp, and the option to download segments is cool if you don't want to fill up your hard drive.
This site after a few months and more updates should be worth checking out. Members of stuffedpetite.com may want to consider joining this site, since the quality of that site has dropped, and the content is not frequent. This site features those same hot young girls and the same style, but with creampies!
Check out the trailers and free galleries, They give you a good idea of the content on offer. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. 1 By Day (21)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
Quality hi-def videos and photo sets.
Beautiful girls.
Fast downloads and works with my favourite DL manager.
Good navigation and organisation.
Girls on all sorts of machines.
Frequent updates.
Cool Iris support is very neat. |
| Cons: |
Not enough hardcore - site is mostly solo girl and girl-on-girl.
Hardcore content is same as on Hands on Hardcore, another DDF site so if you want just hardcore, you'd best give this site a miss.
Expensive for what's on offer.
Some old content is remastered, which in some cases is good, but it means less new content. |
| Bottom Line: |
I couldn't really recommend this site - after membership of Hands on Hardcore I was curious to see what this partner site had to offer and found myself somewhat disappointed.
If you're really into the girls then this site offers plenty of information, casting videos and Flash castings (something unique to this site).
Being able to browse photosets using CoolIris is a bonus, though I couldn't get it working in IE, just Firefox.
If you love girls with toys, solo girls and girl-on-girl action, then you'll love this site, but for pure hardcore girl-on-guy(s) action, stick with Hands on Hardcore. |
| Respond: |
3 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Swirlie Girls (1)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Bill through CCBill
-Beautiful HD quality at 1920x1080, 7100 kbps.
-Three download options-best quality, good quality and fast download.
-No DRM's or download limits.
-Part of The Hardcore Network of 18 sites
-Inexpensive two day full access trial tothe entire network. |
| Cons: |
-Has only 23 videos of about 20 minutes each.
-There is a picture set for each video. In total there are 3649 photos. They cannot be zip downloaded.
-The photos are mostly on a diagonal and cut off parts of the girl's body. Doesn't look natural.
-The photos are all portrait, not a single landscape for variety.
-The pictures do not have the girls name, so they are all numbered. Very confusing after you have downloaded what you want.
-The girls are well known American pornstars, as far as I know. No amateurs or other nationalities. Many have ugly tattoos, many have bleach blond hair. |
| Bottom Line: |
The first time I saw girls being dunked in a toilet bowl was on meatmemebers.com sites. The focus there was on what happened after a blow job to clean up a "dirty girl" after what she just did. It was handled as dominance by the male with the girl accepting her "punishment". As such, it was a bit shocking and got my attention. This site handles this completely differently. The girl usually gives a pretty good, energetic bj. Sometimes the male is a bit forceful with her though, and she is dunked several times during it as well as after. The site proudly tells you how many times for each scene. In the interviews the girls sometimes say what a big turn on it all is. In a few cases it seems to be really the case. However, most of the girls, when being interviewed, say they are just going along with it. Often the girls voluntarily put their head in the bowl, which I think totally ruins any sense of believable reality. Anything for money I guess. Personally, the idea of doing this for fun is hard to believe, even in the crazy world of porn. The idea of reluctance but voluntarily dunking her head in the bowl does not work for me either. I took this site as yet another step towards more and more extreme acts that lose their shock value by being done too often. They should have just stuck to only doing pretty good blow jobs, which this site has galore. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
 Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|
