Bisexual Porn Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
Requires minimum of 1 review. This changes periodically.
View All: Top Rated Sites
|
|
Most Active
Sites ranked by the total number of user reviews.
View All: Most Active Sites
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |

1. Three Pillows (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive Bi-sexual Videos
Sex Stories (some are audio)
Good Picture galleries w zip downloads
Drawings and comics
Updates come often
Some videos have full-scene downloads |
| Cons: |
Too Expensive, needs full trial access option
Video Quality so behind the times, poor
Very few audio sex stories narrated by men
Site design needs to be overhauled, it's dull
Not many preview stills for videos |
| Bottom Line: |
I heard great things about this site and was
quite disappointed in both the site design
and video quality. I would expect this if I
was seeing this site 10 years ago, not today. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


2. Bisex Strapon Fuckers (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Has videos and screenshots |
| Cons: |
No original content. All content is the same as what is on the bisexual section of Straponfuckers.com. No updates. Video resolution could be better. Most screenshots are blurry. |
| Bottom Line: |
If it wasn't for the bonus sites, this would not be worth anything. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|


3. Three Pillows (3)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
- seems to be run by the people who're bisexuals themselves
- pretty good variety of actions
- quite good models
- lots of relevant extras ("bi position of the week", bi cartoons etc.), making it kind of 'portal'
- seem to organize some shoots themselves with members comments (what members want to see) taken into account |
| Cons: |
- video quality
- video quality
- video quality
- did I already say "video quality?" :-)
- most videos are in other-than-English languages w/o subtitles (not that it matters that much though for this kind of content)
- site design is quite poor |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is quite interesting as it looks not exactly usual porn site with adult content only, but more as a portal for bisexual (mostly MMF) people.
Most of the content is exclusive, but not shoot by them themselves or according to their guidelines; lots of content is bought from now defunct bi sites (they say it openly). This old content is usually horrible in video (and sometimes cameraguy work) quality. Sometimes they shoot it themselves, but (unfortunately) not too often.
Bottom line: if you're into MMF bi sex, you should definitely try it (despite all the shortcomings, other bi sites seem to be even worse), if not - still can be good if you're bored of the same patterns and are not afraid to become bi just because of looking at MMF sex :-); beware of video quality though (very low by today standards, but in this niche there might not be that much choice). |
| Respond: |
1 Reply
- Add Reply
|
|

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
Niche RSS Feeds |
|
|
| You may need to copy the links above to your favorite RSS reader (like Google Reader). |
|