Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 1-23 of 23  

Visit Wet And Pissy

1. Wet And Pissy (1)

Pay
Active
100
LPee23 (13) 03-03-14  07:15pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: WetAndPissy.com is the best new development in the world of pee sites since it's launch in 2012. They are doing just about everything right and setting the standard high. Their focus is on extremely high quality solo girl peeing.
-photo resolution 2800x1867
-video resolution 1080P (1920x1080)
-wide variety of great models
-action includes solo peeing, pee drinking, and pussy pumps (a defining feature of the Puffy Network)
-attention is paid to the model's dress, makeup, and setting with lots of variety and visually stimulating settings
-all suggestions on TBP to date have been addressed including renaming all of the files as suggested previously in the comments
The above has all the makings for an excellent review, but what bumps it over the top for a 100%? This site is a perfect example of how a site should be run. Their owner is extremely attentive to his members, which is rare in a large network site. It is abundantly clear that he is working very hard to make his site the best.
Cons: Hard to think of any cons for this site. Not really a con in my book, but you know what you are getting with this site. If solo girl peeing presented in a glamorous way is not what you are looking for, then maybe look elsewhere?
Bottom Line: WetAndPissy.com is a pee site like no other. I feel comfortable giving a rating of 100%, because I am not only drawing on my own experience. I keep in touch with a number of other people online with similar interests, and WetAndPissy.com is consistently mentioned as a favorite. They are a relatively new site in a niche with over a decade worth of material online, yet they have managed to create a unique and unmistakable style that defines their scenes. They are generally shot indoors in very stylish, modern, artistic settings. The quality of the photography is readily apparent, and they bring out the best in their models. One of my favorite themes in their work is models peeing on a glass table, with shots from both above and below. In keeping with the WetAndPuffy.com tradition, they also feature a good number of scenes with pussy pumps. The have a distinctive and umistakaeble style, which is hard to accomplish.
On their landing page, they say "They are rare, but we found them - hot pissing girls..." Well, those who know the niche well know that at a glance it seems like there are plenty of them on the net. But what is rare is NEW sites dedicated to peeing, like WetAndPissy.com. In fact, in 2014, WetAndPissy.com remains the most recent dedicated pee site on the scene. So if you are looking for the freshest content, shot artfully in high resolution, then I would give this site my highest recommendation.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Wetscape

2. Wetscape (1)

Pay
Active
85
LPee23 (13) 01-20-14  12:18pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: Wetscape.com is a site with history. It is the undisputed, original large pee site. Launched in 1998, Wetscape.com was the most prolific pee site in the early years. They paved the way for all pee sites that followed, and shot almost every type of peeing scene - solo, golden showers, indoors, outdoors, bondage peeing, wetting, naughty peeing, and drinking.
Their members section only seems to have a handful of videos from TheArtofPee.com, making it easy to think they are a site clone. There is a small link there for the Archives section - this is where basically the entire Wetscape site is located!
-great for photo fans
-523 photo sets with over 18,000 photos
-resolution is good for the era at mostly 600x800
-444 videos in 720x526 resolution
Cons: This site is only for a sub-set of porn users. You have to either be a dedicated photo fan, or have a real urge to see the original, classic pee site. Those of you who may have surfed the net for pee pics in the early 2000's will recognize a lot of these pics, even if you never joined Wetscape.com. Wetscape.com was so heavily pirated, they all but populated UseNet with pee pics. Those who do not realize this history may look at Wetscape.com and think it has a bunch of non-exclusive UseNet pics, but it is the other way around. These pics actually started off exclusive at Wetscape, but they totally lost control of their content. More than UseNet, there were entire paysites, some of which still exist, that based their content in part or exclusively on Wetscape.com pics. You will still get much more at Wetscape.com than you ever did on UseNet. Other cons:
-no zips
-there are scattered videos that are truly non-exclusive (less than 5%)
Bottom Line: Wetscape.com is one of a kind, and there will never be another site like it. It's creators were pioneers to put together the first large pee site. This is the type of site that you can't criticize for not updating - it is a work in completion. You can't criticize the 800x600 size of the photos - it was part of the era. As a photo lover I think 800x600 is not bad at all, and even with our 3000x2000 photos nowadays, I can still get a lot of enjoyment out of these older pics. No doubt, pee sites since have looked at these photos and had some inspiration.
I remember the first time I was a member at Wetscape.com back in 2002. I spent a month downloading all of their pics, and when I was finished, there was this great sense of accomplishment. Wetscape.com pics made up such a huge chunk of the free pics and even pics at other paysites that that time, that I felt like I had just downloaded a good chunk of all the peeing pics online. Wetscape.com did not watermark their pics, so it was only if you looked at their entire site that you would realize that a huge chunk of those early unidentifiable peeing pics without watermarks started out as exclusive content on Wetscape.com.
Unfortunately, I lost my original porn collection, so where was the first place I went to rebuild it? Wetscape. More bad fortune, I lost my collection a second time, but this time, in 2009, Wetscape.com had closed. If there was any doubt about it in 2008, their closure signified that the era of the first generation pee sites was over. This was a terrible disappointment, because I felt like my collection could literally never be complete without it.
Then, in 2013, something amazing happened. Wetscape.com was back up and running again, thanks to Tramp Stamp Studios! It is so rare for a site to come back from the dead, and for Wetscape.com to come back after 5 years, it seemed too good to be true! As I joined, I just hoped that it wouldn't be a thinned down version of the original, but I was not disappointed! It was all basically there. 98% of their sets were totally intact. Their oldest sets - absolute classics - were reduced to 1 photo each and complied by model into new sets so that a single model that originally had 20 sets would now have one set of 20 photos, each from a different original set. The amazing thing is that Wetscape.com was so heavily copied, that I can still today point anyone who is interested to other peeing paysites that still do have all of the classic Wetscape.com sets that were thinned down! So you can still in the year 2014 have all of the original photos from Wetscape, dating back to 1998!
So you can see from my review that I love this site. I would personally give it a score close to 100%, but in taking into account the general tastes of others and what I know people look for in a site, I had to give it an 85%. What brought it down a bit? The majority of users are looking for video over pictures, and Wetscape.com videos were never among the best - also some truly non-exclusive videos. In addition to that, while the site is 98% complete, and the other 2% can still be found elsewhere, I have to take some points from any site that removes their old stuff as a matter of principle. Also, the lack of zips makes this a time consuming site to visit. It was still totally worth it for me though. The bottom line is this - if you like pictures, peeing, and classic early 2000's material - this is the site for you. Wetscape.com was the first, there will never be another one, and I am glad to have it back!
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Art Of Pee

3. The Art Of Pee (1)

Pay
Active
55
LPee23 (13) 01-20-14  11:14am
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: This site seems to have started off promising, but never really look flight. They have a total of 13 clips and 13 photosets available for members. They have not been removing content, these are the only ones they ever posted. The scenes are all solo girl peeing.
-models include Clara G, Zafira, and Adrianna Russo
-video resolution: 720x408
-photo resolution: 1500x1000
-membership comes with access to 13 other sites in network
Cons: There is a minimal amount of content. They don't ever seem to have updated after posting their original 13 scenes. There is just not much more to say here. Also, while Wetscape.com is a Tramp Stamp Studios site, it is not included in the network of sites that come with TheArtofPee.com.
Bottom Line: I don't think 13 scenes are worth the price of membership no matter how you cut it. They are decent quality scenes, with recognizable European models, but just way to little to make up a site. The only way I could recommend joining this site is if you were also interested in one or more of the 13 other sites in the network.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit VIPissy

4. VIPissy (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
Cum Play John (2) 01-02-14  12:33pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: An intense and beautiful exploration of peeing into gorgeous woman's mouths and on their faces and bodies. Videos unlike anything else on the web.

Have you ever imagined being able to pee into a supermodel's mouth?

This is the place.

There are no unattractive women on this site.
Cons: In its earliest stages, this site suffers from not nearly enough content, hence my 85 out of 100.

Also, they haven't yet figured out that if they're going to get gorgeous women to receive pee orally, most male viewers would just assume prefer that pee coming from the tip of a penis and not from another woman. (And POV style, please. Not so many side shots!) Whereas about half their videos involve women-on-women.

There's also the whole moral dilemma about is material this hardcore too transgressive? I always feel conflicted on viewing it... (But it is truly spectacular, at its best.)
Bottom Line: VIPissy is the cutting edge for some of the hardest hardcore out there, but still in its early beginnings as a fairly small site.

It is more selective than other peeing sites in choosing only gorgeous models.

If they focused more on male-female POV scenes almost exclusively, they would gain more members.

It's a great concept, pushing golden showers to new limits, but will need time.

A 3-month sign-up deal for 49.90 is not a bad offering price.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Bank

5. Piss Bank (1)

Pay
Active
99
LPee23 (13) 10-11-13  08:03pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (6), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: I am giving Piss Bank a 99% rating on my first review ever fully knowing that a 99% review is rare. What makes Piss Bank so different? While it is a very large and high quality peeing site with many models, it is run like the best of the smaller sites, where individual member feedback is actually valued and acted upon. It features many "girls next door", so if you want to see new girls, you will be pleased.
Also, you can email the producer directly, she is happy to talk with members, and she is a true pee fetishist!
-over 860 photo sets of large, sharp photos
-over 1,100 videos
-all except oldest videos in HD, many in 3D too
-plenty of content - hope you have 150 Gb free
-unique European girls not seen in other sites
-all pics have zip files now
Cons: When a site is the best in their niche, and they're doing everything so right, it's hard to come up with cons. Here are two minor points:
1. I had difficulty with some links once, but Piss Bank was very responsive and solved the problem fast.
2. Log-in system occasionally asks you to re-enter your password.
Bottom Line: This site is a must-have for pee lovers, and I would rank it first in its class! Tons of unique, high quality peeing content at the cutting edge of video with lots of HD and the most 3D I've seen. Tens of thousands of high quality peeing pics, taken by great photographers, and many are so sharp you can see every drop of pee without any blur. The only question I had after looking through this site was, why didn't I join earlier? How did I let myself miss out on this for so long? It's absolutely great!
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Wet And Pissy

6. Wet And Pissy (1)

Pay
Newbie
85*
critic (2) 04-07-13  02:20am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (8), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Gorgeous models performing exactly as advertised.

Expert videography and photography

High quality files, both video and audio

No download limits

The free membership to the other sites is a real value.
Cons: Most of the sequences are too baroque for my taste: too many odd toys and props.

Ghastly-poor file naming habits: costs the user a lot of time cleaning up.
Bottom Line: ON EDIT, May 2013: I remained a member of this site for several weeks until my membership lapsed. File names were never improved in any way at all. Excepting his public posts here, he owner/webmaster never responded to any of the messages/emails I sent concerning the filenaming problem, or on other topics.

ORIGINAL REVIEW: Wow, this is a fabulous site for those who take an interest in the subject matter. Gorgeous models, excellent images- soaking wet. Most of these models are familiar from other European sites and at times it's a surprising pleasure to see a famous star get down and dirty with herself in this way. While updates are not frequent, given the availability of willing models and the quality of the output this is understandable. Free membership in the sister sites is a major bonus.

(FWIW my very fast late-model Mac can have a hard time playing some of the largest "MP4 HD" videos. I find the .wmv files to be more reliable and of perfectly good quality.)

If it weren’t for the file names I’d give WAP a much higher score than it received here*. However, videos and pictures are so badly named as to require a lot of time at the back-end, so to speak, and this really needs to be corrected.

Image zip files all decode to folders named "Images". Not "Goldilocks - Three Bears": "Images". The images in that folder are named "001.jpg", "002.jpg" and so on. The next zip expands the same way, and the next. You can imagine the mess this creates: a pile of folders named “Images1” “Images2” and so forth, with no idea what's in them.

If all of these "001.jpg" files ever get intermingled by user error (trashed accidentally, for example), it's game over for you. The image files should carry the model's name and shoot title.

It's easy to create a zip file which expands to a folder's real name; perhaps it takes a little more effort. Given the slow rate at which content is produced at WetAndPissy, that effort would be nothing at all.

The net result of this is spending a LOT OF TIME back on the site, figuring out what the real name of what you've downloaded is, so you can file it away correctly. (I just happened to download my files in update sequence and thus had a chance at figuring out the real names of all those "Images" folders from the updates webpages. If I'd chosen any other method (favorite models, random choices), it would have been much much worse.)

As to video files, they are inconsistently named and because of this almost equally hard to square away after downloads.

Prepare to spend a lot of time 'on cleanup' after downloads from this site.

If WAP puts a bit more effort into this one serious problem, they'd be a really fabulous place to visit.

*This is the second site I've joined on the basis of a good TheBestPorn review, and the second where the owners can't be bothered to properly name their files. Given the trouble this can cause, I feel TBP needs to make this matter a review criteria.
Respond: 12 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Pissing.com

7. Pissing.com (0)

Pay
Active
80
rearadmiral (326) 03-31-12  11:03am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - 31 scenes
- Mix of girl/girl and boy/girl
- Typical Kink quality
- Good mix of porn stars and relative unknowns
- Videos available in multiple formats
- Photos available (singles and zips)
Cons: - Only 31 scenes
- No longer updating
- No clear indication that the site isn’t updating
- Doesn’t have the same BDSM feel that other Kink sites have
- Price is a little high for a small site that doesn’t update
Bottom Line: The ‘streaming’ videos on this site are excellent. Okay, okay, I’ll try to keep the pee jokes to a minimum here.

I know there are mixed thoughts here about sites that are no longer updating. Jpg386’s comment on this page certainly captures the view that a lot of PU members have on the topic. I’m with the members who think that whether a site is updating or not is just one factor in the value equation.

The site is part of the Kink.com family of sites and as such it is offered as a stand-alone site so a membership here does not give you access to any other Kink sites. Being part of the Kink network the scenes are well shot with lighting, sound and editing all being in the top tier of adult sites. Whoever manages the technical stuff sure is a real whiz. (Sorry, I couldn’t help myself…) What certainly helps too is the female talent. There are many well-known porn stars on the site, such as Amber Rayne, Flower Tucci and Annie Cruz, and there are also a lot of lesser-known models. Many of these lesser-known models (to me, anyway) also appear on other Kink sites so I presume that they’re more known as fetish models rather than mainstream stars.

The site is relatively small, offering only 31 shoots. The shoots are shorter in duration then most other Kink offerings, most being less than 30 minutes long. That certainly starts to move the value marker to making this a less than great value. Some of the scenes have a bit of a set-up where the models play a role, and others have no set up and just have people peeing on a woman. The one constant is that the scenes aren’t a peeing free-for-all: there is usually one female model who is the receiver. Having one ‘submissive’ model is really the only link that the site has with the BDSM roots of the Kink family tree. People looking for hardcore BDSM with peeing probably won’t find what they’re looking for here. Neither will people who want to see women peeing on men, because most Kink sites have dominant men and submissive women and that remains true here. Jpg386 commented that the site features “mostly a bunch of lesbo scenes where laughing girls pee on each other.” I don’t agree with that in that of the 31 scenes on the site only six are all-girl. The comment is correct, though, in that the mood in the scenes tends to be a lot lighter and less menacing than on other Kink sites. I’m not really sure why the director opted to be less BDSM-themed; it may be that Kink figured that the site was pushing the legal limits as it was and adding in a BDSM element might make the religious right go nuts. Or more nuts, I guess.

Being a Kink site, the technical stuff is well done. Each scene offers a trailer, photos and video. Video is available as a stream or downloadable as a WMV (HD), WMV, MP4 (HD) and in sizes for mobile devices. I downloaded the WMV HD scenes and they come in at 1280x720 at 7200kb/s and 30fps. They’re in Codec 9. Subjectively they look great.

The photos are available in two resolutions (800x533 and 1200x800). They’re available as singles or zipped. While these resolutions aren’t great, you have to consider that the most recent ones were shot at least three years ago when these would have been excellent quality. Which leads me to the biggest negative of the site…

Pissing.com is no longer updating and hasn’t added a new scene in about three years. I can understand that a site may stop updating and I’m not going to fault a site owner for making a business decision to stop shooting for a site, but I do wish that Kink was a bit more open about the fact that the site is no longer active. Back when Kink stopped shooting for Water Bondage they had a disclaimer that the site was no longer updating (but it seems that they’re trying to revive it). Eventually that disclaimer was removed. Same for Pissing.com. To make matters worse, Kink stopped listing the dates of the shoots so it is almost impossible for a prospective member to know that the site is no longer adding new material. This seems strange for a company that otherwise does everything else right and has a reputation for treating their customers well.

So is the site worth a look? I think so, but a person should consider the value for themselves. I’ve had memberships at similar themed sites before and can say that the Kink way of doing things means that Pissing.com is pretty much the number one site for number one. (Sorry again… that’ll be the last joke.) There are 31 great scenes that look good and are available in most ways a member would want them. I do hope that they’ll reactivate the site some day, and until then I do wish they’d be more open about the site’s status. Until they start filming again, they should lower the price to better reflect the true value of a small, inactive site. But even with that caveat, if you like this niche, I’d recommend the site for sure.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit I Need 2 Pee

8. I Need 2 Pee (0)

Pay
Active
69
BrockLion (5) 02-14-12  02:47am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: + 357 videos, 1 new one every Tuesday.
+ unique content
+ Videos are of women wetting their clothes, mostly after not being able to get to a toilet.
+ The women often remove their outer garment and show how wet their panties are.
Cons: - Of course the videos are contrived. How else would a woman who needs to pee have a cameraman following her.
- Sometimes the acting is really poor (maybe all the time).
- Some of the videos are very poorly done.
- Almost no nudity, but that is the intended goal of the site.
Bottom Line: . If you want to see nudity this is not the site for you, there are only two pussies exposed in the entire set of videos and both of those are inadvertant and brief; they might be called cameo appearances.
. In a day when so many other sites have gone to more frequent updates or higher quality videos, this site has only gone from their initial 320x240 videos to the current 640x480 and remained at one update per week (Tuesdays).
. This is really a narrow niche
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Crazy Pee Girls

9. Crazy Pee Girls (0)

Pay
Active
75
BrockLion (5) 12-11-11  09:13am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (7), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - The site is dedicated to peeing videos, no photos.
- Full nudity is often included.
- One new video every week.
- The most recent videos are
- a girl takes her clothes off in a bath tub and pees in the tub
- girl takes her clothes off indoors and pees on the floor or into a container.
- Some videos are of one or more girls doing a quick pee outdoors.
- A few involve some male-female interaction
- Some other scenarios.
- Currently 233 videos, a couple of them are corrupt and vere never fixed.
Cons: - Videos are not unique to this site, many can be found elsewhere.
- Videos are not high quality.
Bottom Line: Among sites in this niche this appears to be an average site; few, if any, have real HD video.
After my current membership lapses, I don't know if I will come back
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Bank

10. Piss Bank (1)

Pay
Active
88
artnoir (17) 08-20-10  06:40pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - A site dedicated to pissing/watersports
- Works like any other pay site; you pay a monthly fee and download all you want
- Excellent video options ranging from Full HD (1920x1280) to 640x480, in different formats (old vid's have been upgraded as well)
- No token-system and no pushing you to buy DVD's
- The Spanish trio is very sexy, and they carry this site
- Think of ALS Scan but with pissing as the main theme
- Natural and fun videos, the girls seems to enjoy it
- Behind the scenes videos
Cons: - Limited content (but growing)
- Older videos are in poor quality, as is the models
- Site design is confusing at first and old-school, but when you get used to it, it works great. (like ALS, again)
- The three Spanish girls is really the only good content on the site
Bottom Line: I was really exctatic when I found this site.
Finally some quality videos in the fetish that I like so much.

This site does deliver, but it is pretty much the three Spanish babes that does it.

However I'm glad that I joined and it was money well spent, especially on a site like this.

Highly recommended!
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Need A Pee

11. Need A Pee (0)

Pay
Active
80
dracken (246) 09-29-09  03:24pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - There are many videos (151) at various sizes the most recent ones are all 16:9 Widescreen and come in 864*480 around 30mb | 864*480 around 50mb | 1280*720 - 80.6mb The older videos are a bit fuzzy especially at the very small resolutions but they tend to be only a few mb.

- 33 sets of photos around 100 images each at 1200 dpi * 1200 dpi The photos for the most part were awesome. The best part of the site by far.

- many other bonuses such as a blog, a forum (pretty active too), audio stories and a free by-weekly webcam show. All and all quite a large mount of bonus and the model (Rebeka Dee) puts a lot of effort into keeping in touch. Much Kudos for her effort to stay close to her fans.

- every video is of model peeing, usually outdoors, sometimes peeing herself. Usually the girl seems forced to pee and there is no toilet around (hence the name of the site)

- pretty decent variation in videos, very interesting for pee fans
Cons: - there is something that lacks from the videos on this site. There is a lot of variation as Rebeka pees her tights, her underwear, into glasses and cups and on a glass table. There are also a bunch of "debut girls" peeing and a few models peeing public. But that is about it. The models don't play with themselves very much and the whole scene is usually focused only on peeing. Rarely do we have the model talk or strip before peeing. Then again this might be a bonus of you only enjoy seeing a girl pee. I just wish she would include access to her regular solo site with this membership or give us more sexy videos.


- although there are quite a few other models guest staring they don't have a page of their own or some sort of model search. Also a search just in general would have been nice.
Bottom Line: This site is definitely something else. If you like peeing, especially outdoors peeing and don't care that you probably won't see a boob in any of the videos this is the place for you. There are all sorts of peeing related scenes, even some golden showers with cute girls (the best were in the photo section and only a few of them; mostly it's girls peeing themselves or urinating in public and one or two guys being peed on by Rebeka).

The site offers a lot of bonus content and the main model really tries to be close to her fans, which makes this a great solo site in my opinion. But offering her regular solo site as a bonus would have made this deal a million times better.

More diversity in the action within the videos could help a lot. A little foreplay, maybe some slow stripping. Maybe also more dialogue. The webcam archives are the only place Rebeka really talks. Also a search by model and more golden showers could help, but maybe that's just me.
Oh, if you join make sure to check out the video where she starts off playing with a dildo and ends up pissing. It's the best on the site and more like it would have been appreciated.

I really enjoyed this page and felt like the models were having a good time doing the shots unlike other pee sites were the girls look miserable. All and all if you like pee or seeing a girl wet her panties this is a great site to check out (especially if you like how Rebeka looks) but if that is not your cup of tea this site won't change your mind.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Pissing.com

12. Pissing.com (0)

Pay
Active
90
rearadmiral (326) 11-28-08  04:33pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (71), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: • It’s a Kink.com site so it is backed a reputable company
• Exclusive videos
• Hardcore, but not misogynistic
• Some very beautiful models and some interesting set-ups
• Photos and videos, as well as a trailer for each shoot
• Weekly updates (Tuesday)
• Long videos – most are around 30 minutes
• No DRM
• Zips available for the pictures and videos
• Fast downloads (I average 350+ kb/sec – that’s at least 100kb/sec faster than I get with Videobox)
Cons: • Site is still small because it is new, but it updates weekly
• No options for file sizes
Bottom Line: Pissing.com is the latest offering from Kink.com. If you like fetish videos, then you probably already know Kink. Kink is probably the premier fetish site on the web today. (I say “probably” only because I don’t know of any company that does it better.)

The set-ups are pretty much the same – the girl starts clothed, and in most cases she starts the peeing by doing it herself. Then one or more guys come in to add to the fun. Pissing.com is different from other sites that I know of that feature peeing. Max Hardcore does pissing as part of a rough sex scene, unlike Pissing.com which makes pissing the sole focus. The only other site where I’ve had a membership is Piss Mops, which is part of the Meat Members group. Like Max, Piss Mops is pretty misogynistic, and that would be a turn off for lot of fans who are just into watersports and not seeing women degraded. I know this sounds strange, but Pissing.com doesn’t degrade the women. The women seem to be willing and eager participants. Another benefit of pissing.com is that since pissing is the whole focus, the videos are long for this genre. The average video is probably 30 minutes long. This is good, but the trade-off is that the models don’t get a real hosing off. Most times the pisser takes his time.

Since I labeled the pissers as male above, that raises an issue that some people may find fault with. The site is primarily male on female pissing. There is some female on female, but not much. I prefer male on female, but as the site grows, maybe those of you who like f-on-f will get more.

File sizes for videos average 250MB and can be downloaded as a zip, though it still unzips into a number of smaller videos (usually 3 to 4). This is a great feature that is used throughout Kink sites. Photos are also available as a zip. There are no options for file sizes but the resolution is fairly good. The videos aren’t DVD quality, but they are still very good. The bit rate is 2140bps, with the screen resolution being 960x540. There is a small but unobtrusive watermark in the lower left corner.

The site is new, so it isn’t too big right now, but the webmaster says that there will be weekly updates on Tuesdays. I have no doubt that this is the case as every other Kink site updates weekly. (To give full marks to Kink.com, when they stopped updating Water Bondage they informed everyone. Lesser sites would just stop and continue to collect money.)

I know I might be accused of being a Kink.com shill, but apart from being a very satisfied customer I have no relationship with them. All of their sites are top quality – I’d go so far to say that they set the standard. If you like fetish stuff, check out Kink. I can report that they are also customer oriented too. I had a password problem (of my own making) with a membership to another Kink site and they responded to my email in less then 24 hours and they recommended and implemented a quick and easy solution.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Pee Lover

13. Pee Lover (0)

Pay
Active
81
badandy400 (103) 10-07-08  02:54pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Network access
Good amount of videos
Many nice looking girls
More pee drinking here
Newer videos look nice
Site keeps even the oldest stuff
Do not need to log in a lot
Decent trial price
Several viewing options
Cons: Can only download one video at a time
Site expensive $35 per month
Videos are very short, most less than 2 minutes
Older videos are very low quality
Videos open new page, some older ones do not though
Files not names descriptively
No hardcore here, some blow jobs though
Bottom Line: This site is more about one and sometimes two girls peeing and being peed on. There is a lot more pee drinking and attention to that since it is only one person peeing on the girl.

This site has a of scenes to it but it is a small site to download. The whole site is just over 4 GB to download, but takes a lot time to queue up in a download manager. Each video opens up a new page that has to be closed out. You can not move around the site while a video is downloading either.

The video quality for the newer stuff is nice. It is 2400 KBit and 640 x 480. The older stuff is streaming only, of course this can be downloaded too. It is very low resolution 320 x 240 and as low as 338 KBit. This must be expected for older videos though.

They seem to update every two weeks, but they do not put dates on the videos, even in the updates section.

The oldest stuff in the updates section is pictures only. They are hardly worth mentions as they are very small. This is not a site for the picture fans.

I like this site a little better than some of the others on the network because it stays closer to what it is. It is a site about girls liking pee and that is what they do. Many scenes have girls peeing on themselves, having a guy or sometimes a girl pee in their pussy and the drinking it with a long tube. Most of the scenes have a guy peeing in the girls mouth, sometimes she swallows it and others she spits it out.

Pretty much every scene includes the girl peeing, typically in a glass. There is even a few lesbian scenes.

There is definitely a lot to choose from with about 300 different scenes. Each is a little different but can be a little repetitive.

If you enjoy girls peeing and being peed on, drinking pee, and even being peed in then this site is worth checking out. You will have to deal with a few nagging points, such as download difficulties and lower video quality, but all in all it is worth it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bukkake Pee

14. Bukkake Pee (0)

Pay
Active
79
badandy400 (103) 10-07-08  02:03pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Loads of pee here
-Decent amount of content
-Videos reasonable quality
-No DRM
-Some very good looking girls
-Most file names include model
-Access to network
-Many download and stream file type options
-Do not have to log in frequently
Cons: -Sites is pretty expensive at $35 for a month
-Older videos are not named well, newer ones are ok
-Older stuff is low resolution, to be expected though
-Must download videos in clips, usually 10 minutes each. No option for a single larger file.
-Videos can be very repetitive
-Many scenes have a handle full of guys but no intercourse
-Videos open a new page, even for downloading
-Navigation takes a minute to get used to
Bottom Line: Better bring a very large towel with you here! The site is about pee and they do not mess around, there is a lot of it.

The average scene is a girl peeing in a bowl then dumping on herself. Then a bunch of guys come in a pee all over her. After than they all jerk of and she blows them until they cum all over her.

It is all pretty random here. The only scripted parts are when they should pee, or get head and such. There is no organization for anything else. The site definitely has an amateur feel to it. The content itself and the presentation seems amateur. The camera bounces around a lot.

This is one of the larger sites on the network in actual size to download anyway. The site is 35.3 GB and has 239 video clips and has about 50 scenes. Each scene has four or so clips to it.

The quality of the videos is not bad. The average clip is about 150 MB or so and 7 to 10 minutes long. The bit rate goes up to 2300 KBit and at full scene look about like VHS. The videos are mostly 640 x 480. The older ones are half that.

The photos here are nothing special and are basically screen caps anyway. It is all about the videos.

In many of the scenes some of the pee can be pretty yellow. This may of may not bother you, but I prefer it to be clear. I also prefer lesbian pee scenes over scenes with guys. For me it is about where it comes from rather than what it is. There is some solo and lesbian peeing but it is vastly guy peeing on girl.

The sites gives access to a network of other sites, many of which feature peeing and fisting. If are into pee at all than this site should be worth considering because of the network access. You are bound to find a few scenes that do the trick for you. This is the only site here that features a group of guys peeing on one or two girls, many other sites have just one or two guys.

If you have a things for golden showers than the price would be worth it to you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pee Pee Galore

15. Pee Pee Galore (0)

Pay
Active
83
badandy400 (103) 09-23-08  01:13pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Extreme content, piss drinking and such
-Have not seen content elsewhere
-Several download options and streaming, mpg, wmv, mov
-Access to a large number of sites on network
-Do not need to log in from day to day, nice if you use a download manager since your queue will not expire on you
Cons: -Site layout needs a bit of work
-Can not download more than one file at a time, you cant even move around the site while downloading
-A bit pricy
-Video quality could use some work, I have seen better -looking videos at 2300Kbit
-It opens a new page when trying to download a video
-Videos are segmented, most have two or three parts
-Videos have meaningless names (clip_2_wm2.mpg) for example. I would like to see(Sarah and Jane - Lesbians on the roof.mpg) or something at describes the video a little
Bottom Line: If you are into pee than this is a great place to start. There are a decent number of video here that you would find interesting.

Having access to the network is great because it gives you several other pee sites too and fisting if that is something you like.

The videos show some variety and are shot in different locations. One is a nice blonde with a wine bottle in a room full of kegs, of course peeing all over herself.

Many of the scenes are hardcore and feature both performers peeing one each other. Even a few lesbian and solo scenes too.

Even though you can only download one file at a time it should take too long to have the whole site. There is 10.3 GB of videos (if you download the largest size) and totals 61 files. Each is about 10 minutes long. The newer stuff is 640x480 and about 2300Kbit. I honestly have seen better quality even for that bit rate. The could really stand to increase that, I want to see the pee drops on her!

As with most porn now, the girls here are shaved for the most part. I prefer this though, but I thought I would mention it.

The do need to work on site navigation. The whole network looks the same and it can be confusing at times. I wish they had put dates on the videos, although they always say they are posting new updates they only show it for the whole network so it is hard to say how ofter each site is updated.

What it comes down to is do you want to see girls playing with pee and getting banged hard. If that is what you want to see today than put this site on your list of sites to consider. There is definitely some decent content here.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Pissing Stars

16. Pissing Stars (0)

Pay
Active
75
badandy400 (103) 04-07-08  05:49pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Very good pissing videos
-many download options
-Decent speed
-Exclusive
-The videos ARE downloadable
Cons: -LIMITED ACCESS TRIAL, did not used to be this way
-Very few updates in the past 6 months
-Pricy at $30
-TBP lists as using CCBIll, they use WSPay instead, I like CCBill better
-Extremely slow updates
Bottom Line: I was very disappointed when I tried to use the trial to get in for 3 days and found it was limited access. It used to be a full trial.

I was a member about 7 months ago and thought this site was great. The videos do not look bad and now they give 3 options: 128, 512, and 1024 kbps. The they can be downloaded in chunks or in full and even in Flash format.

If you use the trial it gives access to the first three chunks of each video. About 20 MB a piece. There can be anywhere from 5 chunks up to around 15. Each chunk is kinda like a new scene, but with the same location and people. Obviously they have to cut a lot...they cant pee 3 gallons without stopping!

The updates dates are a lie though. I only see one video that was not there 7 months ago! The videos are good, as I said, but they need to have plenty of updates for $30 a month. Also, dont bother with the pictures, they are nothing special at all.

They do a good job with the peeing niche, one of my favorites is when a nice looking girl drinks a glass of champaign then refills it I believe 5 times with her pee and drinks it all!

I score an 75 because the content is very good, but they need to update, not just change the way everything looks. I would like to score higher based only on content, but limited trials and scammy updates prevent them from getting a high score.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit The Art Of Pee

17. The Art Of Pee (1)

Pay
Active
75
badandy400 (103) 03-02-08  08:27pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Trial works!
Stays in its niche
Quality good for price
Photos in zips
HD video
Models are attractive, not typical ugly pee models
Cons: Could use more content
Much more content!
Navigation could use a little work
Bottom Line: Site needs to grow a lot. Easy to download. Can be done easily during the trial period.

The videos are around 5 minutes long and the do offer HD videos at 4 MBit/s, some are 3 MBit/s. The resolutions are 720x540. There are very few photos, only 15 or so to a set and a small handful of sets.

The models are pretty on this site. Many peeing site have nasty looking girls, but they found nice looking girls for this.

This is a site I would love to see grow and if they do I would definitely rejoin in the future. Currently the content is worth the trial price if you like peeing.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit French Pee

18. French Pee (0)

Pay
Newbie
85*
lovefemalepiss2 (1) 06-16-07  09:36pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: excellent exclusive content, many new faces, great video quality download choices,mpg being the best.great lesbian piss scenes. you won't be dissapointed if you join;you get full access to all of the sites(15?) very underrated site,in my opinion....
Cons: very slow downloads. not enough updates. a bit on the expensive side.
Bottom Line: a good pissing site that deserves a month of watching.the updates are slow,downloads are slow,true,but the vast array of choices of scenes, new faces,unique exclusive content plus full access to other bonus sites(athens girls,max hardcore,as examples) make this a winner for me.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit French Pee

19. French Pee (0)

Pay
Active
72
Gazette Risque (55) 06-12-07  08:48am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (38), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Multiple video formats for downloading.
* Exclusive content.
* Regular updates.
* A lot of models, some of them are cute.
* Full network access to 22 sites.
* Option to stream the videos instead of download.
* Option to buy your membership by phone.
* Trial membership gets you full access.
Cons: * Not sure if all the models are French.
* Video quality of older videos is way below par.
* No option to download the videos as a whole, only scenes.
* No photo galleries, just video stills which are very low quality.
* Mostly the same models as the sister sites.
* Videos are all sort of the same.
Bottom Line: FrenchPee.com is a website that features videos of (supposedly) French girls drinking pee and getting peed on.

The website launched in 2005 and is now a home to more than 100 different exclusive videos. All videos are supposedly featuring French girls getting peed on. I'm not sure if every girl is really French though...

They offer regular updates, every week. The updates include a new video and a gallery of video stills.

The videos can be downloaded only as split scenes, not as a whole. Also the videos are offered in a variety of formats such as: WMV320x240 1200kbps, WMV640x480 2400kbps, MPEG 640x480 2400kbps and QuickTime 640x480 2400kbps. They can also be streamed. The galleries of video stills are very low quality. Also the older videos are very low quality.

Most models featured in the videos are pretty cute compared to the sister sites, although a lot of them appear on those websites too.

The membership can also be bought by phone. I don't know how this works though.

All in all, the website is connected to a network that offers a broad range of niche specialty sites and has a great amount of exclusive footage.

The quality could be better, especially the galleries.
Some exclusive models wouldn't be bad either.
But on a brighter note, the trial membership gives you full access.
The content is all kind of the same but should keep you entertained for a couple of days. Especially if this is your niche.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


Visit French Pee

20. French Pee (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
tuesday (2) 04-03-07  01:46pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Decent looking females. Some French. Some from Caribbean.Involvement of the guy is minimal. No need to see his face. Some variety in each new scene. A few surprises.
Cons: If the females pee it is on the floor or something. Bad. Prefer girls going on guys, but I guess that is not their fetish.
Bottom Line: Part of the Bukakee Pee site; same models. So same room etc. I did like the naturalness of the women. No fake boobs. Some young women some older. They were pretty into it.
Bottome line. One month was enough. There might have been a few updates but not enough.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Bukkake Pee

21. Bukkake Pee (0)

Pay
Newbie
60*
tuesday (2) 04-03-07  01:38pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Normal looking men with emphasis on the girl.
Female narrating in background enjoys herself.
Decent looking females.
The best looking female an Indian was a complete dipshit and should have been slapped as well.
Part of a package, so enough for a month.
Quality of video fine.
Cons: My first experience with gs on a web site. Would much prefer 5:1 female to male instead of the opposite. If you have seen one you have seen them all. No variety in script, shot or positions.
Bottom Line: Mediocre.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Piss Bank

22. Piss Bank (1)

Pay
Newbie
89*
PitBull (1) 03-30-07  06:38am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Unique content, European Girls (Amateurs and Prof.)
High Quality Movies Clips (divx)
starting now with HD quality clips!
Hiqh Quility Picture Sets
Quick and friendly support
Regular new girls, mostly never seen before
Cons: Older Videos with flashlight
All download DVDs only for 6 month membership
no zip files for picture sets
strange login system (sometimes problems with Internt Explorer)- but they told me they will change in the next weeks
Bottom Line: What I really like, is that the site does not have only peeing content, they provide also dildo, selfmade, public flashing, glamour, fetish shoes and clothes, couples, lebsian, and much more. For me solo peeing girls with combination of dildo and stripping is the best:-)) and I really love the latest public peeing movies...
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Chelsea Charms

23. Chelsea Charms (0)

Pay
Active
63
BostonPJR (72) 01-09-07  06:52pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (32), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros: - Photo quality is not bad. Lots of photos per shoot. Pretty good detail.
- Chelsea is by far one of, if not the, biggest girl in the giant bust business.
- A few good videos.
Cons: Where to start ...
- Many of the pics are ancient and updates are infrequent. Bottom line: even with pics going back to 2001, there's not much here.
- Beware, it's pretty much a topless only site. I know that the breasts are what we're here for, but that is literally all there is.
- Nearly all video looks like it was shot with a cell phone. There were some scenes where she may actually have gotten completely nude and I honestly couldn't even tell.
Bottom Line: Fans of giant breast fetish most likely already know who Chelsea Charms is. Probably the biggest of the mammoth breast girls and one of the best looking. But the site hardly does her justice. Little more than a fansite, most shoots and videos look like they were done in a hotel room right before some convention. I like the lady, but I need more than a few dozen photoshoots of her getting topless and smiling at the camera to make it worthwhile.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 1-23 of 23  


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Wet And Pissy (1)
2. The Art Of Pee (1)
3. Piss Bank (1)
4. Wetscape (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.13 seconds.