Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
I love this site, Beautiful girls spread wide and juicy. Great insertions.
Just a wonderful place to spend time with on a rainy day.
Downloads are super fast.
These guys/girls know their stuff
Cons:
I like to see more older hairier woman.
Bottom Line:
I'm always looking for a deal and I've been waiting for PJ girls to offer a discount but they never did.
I gotta tell ya I waited too long to join.
At $30 per month its a steal.
I just love this site period!
I'll be back once a year from now on.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
High production values.
Great contributors.
Forum interaction.
Well moderated.
Cons:
Like most sites, the older contributors aren't in HD but that's not a con, just a limitation of the time when the earlier vids were filmed.
Bottom Line:
IFM is geared toward the female orgasm so hardcore fans would be left wanting. For me, the reward is in the site's honest effort to produce something a bit more artistic and personal.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, the most realistic, most believable and most natural porn site on the internet.
- 5,408 scenes of mostly solo masturbation but also has lesbian and some male/female.
- I've been a member here off and on for over 10 years.
- Uses GMBill, a lesser known biller but I've never had any problems with them.
- Updates daily, sometimes twice.
- Women of nearly all shapes, size and looks.
- Navigation takes some getting used to but I've been a member enough that it's pretty easy to use and find what you're looking for.
- Scenes vary from closeups of the model's face to more explicit scenes that show everything.
- Defines the word erotic in the porn world better than any other site.
- Very high technical quality on videos, see bottom line.
- Categories that make it easy to find what you're looking for once you get used to the names of the categories.
- Very good download speeds (85% of my max)
Cons:
- It can be overwhelming. The model list is next to impossible to use to count the models.
- Will apply to any and everyone that joins it, there will be some models you won't find attractive.
Bottom Line:
A long time ago, I gave this site an 85. That was also when most of the content just focused on the model's face and showed very little nudity. I enjoyed some of those scenes but thought it was too soft which is unheard of from me. I even like non-nude "porn".
The scenes have become more explicit though nowhere near as explicit as most sites. There's a connection, for me, between the model and her willingness to be more explicit, to be more vocal and that's a selling point for me. It's women enjoying themselves naturally and most look very comfortable doing it. I don't even know if that's true. Maybe the ones that just show their face/expressions/moans just aren't in the mood to show more on that day.
I do lean towards and favor the ones that show more. Some of them will pull up porn on their laptop and masturbate while watching it. Which kind of makes me laugh a little since I think it shows us men are more impatient than women. You never see them fast forwarding. I also like the minimal production, the lighting, I have bad eyesight and it gets worse when looking at bright lights. The scenes are very good for those into voyeurism.
The numbers can be a little confusing. With 5,408 videos, I'm using their number on that, this is a very large site. They have 2,269 scenes listed as studio. 1,208 listed as fantasy and adventure. 898 listed as homemade. 411 as close-up. 377 as video diary. 157 as lucubrations and 88 as loose ends.
Most of those are self-explanatory. The loose ends ones are shorter, there's outdoor pissing, talking, and as shown by the number this is a very small part of the site. The video diary ones once fooled me into thinking they were interviews but they're not. All that I've watched are masturbation including some exhibitionism.
The video quality on the newest scenes tops out at 1080p, there's also a 540p version and a 270p version. The scenes are short enough that most of the 1080p versions are at or around 500MB each.
Graphic descriptions usually aren't needed for porn but one of my biggest fetishes is hard nipples. You can watch scenes here where you can see the models nipples getting harder. This content is now very appealing to me. My last review of it was during a period of my porn journey that favored and preferred hardcore content. Now, I can see, hear and enjoy this porn possibly the way it's supposed to be.
I didn't list this as a con only because I think it would detract from the scenes, there are no pictures. Most of these models look like they've got themselves ready to go and perform, so throwing in "how about we take 150 photos real quick" might break that momentum.
It's also one of the few sites that has bios for the models that seem real. They list their favorite books, movies and music. Depending on your own taste in those, you can pick up on one for example, saying she's an ABBA fan.
I do like the girl/girl scenes as these seem to be very believable, a major selling point in lesbian porn but really don't care for the male/female scenes.
I think it would be easy for some to miss the model search feature. I know it's right there but it is very in-depth. I use the nationality filter to look for models that fit a look I usually prefer like Brazil where I found Ana B who might be one of the most expressive and active models on the site. Even giving the view of her masturbating on her stomach. If you're patient with the model search you find out it's very useful. You can pick nationality, type of scene (solo, friends), even age range.
If you're going to complain about anything on it I would say the layout, having 513 pages of 10 scenes per page is overwhelming. Use the model search. They do list the model's name and if you click it you can see all of the model's scenes which at least lets you focus on the models you like best.
I don't think this is a site you can really take in over one month. I'm thinking it's going to take me 3 months to get everything I want.
It's a good example of why it's so hard to score a site a 100. There are just minor problems that stop it from being perfect. On a personal note, I would like to see a few more Asians. And looking for them showed another minor problem, the older, I would even say oldest scenes are 480p. I found that when I found a Japanese model from 2008.
Beyond those minor complaints this is a site that does erotic better than all the sites I see promoting themselves as erotic. I also want to mention I haven't hit any download limits but haven't download more than 10GB or so in any of my days as a member.
Great site, now if I can just get myself to cancel it after another month or two.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It focuses on putting you in a woman’s bedroom or two women’s bedroom and watching them during their most intimate times.
Excellent camerawork that captures the model’s faces at the right times, it’s not always that explicit.
More updates than some networks and it’s just one site. Sixteen so far in April 2022 and it’s only the 11th of the month.
Emotionally charged scenes that will make you forget formulaic.
Real orgasms in under 10-15 minutes that will make you wonder what you’re doing wrong.
Much appreciated tags that are some of the most specific I’ve seen. Aimed at people with obscure fetishes?
Cons:
Some of the videos are under a minute and aren’t masturbation.
Real women from what I can tell that aren’t porn models. That’s going to be a con to some.
Bottom Line:
A site that surprised me a lot. Who knew a porn site could be named prophetically? This site should make anyone feel themselves. There is nothing high-tech with the site. It’s just an older looking site that looks like they decided to let their scenes speak for itself. I haven’t seen many of these niches before. There are scenes that I really liked of women masturbating while watching porn. That’s not something I see much in porn. There are scenes of women in a dark room with some clothes on, all clothes on, no clothes on, masturbating over their clothes, under the clothes and nude. The nice women hop up on their knees and give you a better view. The naughty ones are too busy enjoying themselves and don’t care who is watching or if you’re liking it. It’s almost too real. Possibly too real for some people to like even. Not me and not specifically you, just some.
The tags are an important part to me and part of the reason I’ll come back to the site. When they list “hairy” the woman really is hairy. They even have a tag for “pets”. Which is there for you guessed it. A pet decided to get in the view of the camera. They make sure to tell you there’s no bestiality. The tags include ones like “tattoo free” and “hands on” meaning no sex toys. There are ones for “flush” as a redhead, I know about flush skin. These tags tell you so much more about the parts of porn that people complain more about than those silly stories most sites have on the scenes. There is even a “watching porn” tag. I don’t think any site has this specific of tags.
The quality is surprisingly good. Most of the videos have 720p or 1080p download options. There is a download limit, but I have not reached it. It does seem small at 10 GB per day. But the scenes are short. There’s not much talking in any of the scenes. You get some moaning. And the tag I think really plays to people with fetishes is, “contractions”. That means the woman contracts during orgasm. I try to keep up with everything the tags said to expect. The older scenes are not as explicit as the newer ones. I believe they maybe changed their style of scenes or the women in the scenes changed. Some of these women – I am assuming all are amateurs, really go at masturbating and making sure you see everything. It is a style of porn I am not used to. I noticed there is a quote from a user of that site that says she cried the first time she watched a scene from the site. That could be more normal than we think. This site makes it very clear that these women want to be filmed, want to enjoy themselves without being insulted or stereotyped. You end up with some very good performances.
It may still fall short for some people. The only story is these women want to orgasm. There’s no stepdad is watching, and mom is with stepbrother in the shower. It does seem like a very different type of porn than we are used to. It looks more like a woman decided to get naked and said, “Okay, turn the camera on. I’m ready!” There are scenes that have more than one person and those have some talking. They even have a tag for talking. I just can’t explain how important those tags are and the best feature of the tags, if you scroll over the tag, it tells you what it means. Like “Tummy Girls” that means the woman masturbates some in the video while facing down usually with her butt up in the air. It even gives you some educational tidbits like, “20% of women say they masturbate facing down sometimes.”
I don’t know about recommending it. I would, but I have heard things from porn fans. Things that made me want to find different porn. This site really does that for me. I am sure on the score too.
Multiple navigation options that do make it easier to find what you’re looing for, but that is also part of the overwhelming.
Cons:
It's overwhelming. Too much of a good thing.
I have joined 3 different times and feel like I’ve only scratched the surface
Bottom Line:
I followed reviews of Sapphic Erotica, even back when I wasn’t willing to join a porn site. The previews from the site were often featured on referral sites and I always liked the preview videos. There is a lack of realness in the scenes, but authenticity is in the conscious mind of the beholder.
Not only are my only complaints about how big the network is and how good it is, there’s also the rarity of the older scenes often being the best scenes on the network – but only until you watch another scene. This continues for days, then weeks, then you join a year membership. At least that’s how it worked for me!
The site itself has everything you could ever ask for. Many tags, even some that you may not know what the tag means. The main focus of the network is beautiful women. Sapphic Erotica is lesbian content with models that steal the spotlight. You don’t even think about what the story or plot is. A story or plot would likely detract from the action.
The video resolutions are up to 4K and there are multiple download resolutions. You can also download the photosets and there are no download limits. It’s as close to perfect as a network can be for me. It’s the only network I’ve ever joined for a year.
The blend of sites does stay focused on pretty women, but each site has its own identity. Give Me Pink is a solo site with some of the scenes being extreme. The models, despite being 10s in looks and dressed nicely go for timid to out of control orgasms in minutes. Fist Flush is about as far into fisting as I am interested in and by just watching fisting scenes from Fist Flush is my own version of moderation.
Sapphic Erotica is the obvious star of the network. It really is good enough to join just it without any network sites included, but you do get the two extra sites. The lesbian scenes are very much softcore. You won’t see a lot of rough sex between the ladies, but that’s what I prefer. Give Me Pink almost is going too far for my interests. Fist Flush really pushes my limits, but that’s why moderation is good.
I don’t think you’ll find a better softcore “females only” experience than Sapphix.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
It’s my most consistent highly-rated site and it does not disappoint
Six updates per month and the last few months have included lesbian scenes
Download speeds are very good (85% my max)
Tags are accurate and the site is still one of the easest to use
4K downloadable videos if you pay the premium price, I pay $34.95 and get 720p and 1080p downloads
Downloadable picture zips only included if you pay at least for the $34.95 membership
The sexiest models in porn
Cons:
It’s not difficult for me but I imagine a new user would be frustrated with the membership tiers
Knowing if anything ever happens to my In The Crack external hard drive, I’ll have to pay at least $80 to download it all again.
Bottom Line:
It’s In The Crack, in this day of mega networks and cookie cutter porn content, In The Crack continues to just do what they do best. They have a simple equation, it goes like this get a top tier looking model, make her look pretty and even down to earth, then have her show how flexible and kinky she is. Sounds like my idea of a perfect date. In The Crack isn’t going to impress you with deep, psychological plots that revolve around the same half-dozen premises you’re used to. They’re going to impress you with gorgeous women doing the most kinky poses.
It says a lot for In The Crack when I say my favorite picture sets are from In The Crack. That’s probably the last thing they are known for, but their colors, settings and the way they dress and present the models is top-notch. I’m never disappointed with any of their picture sets.
I have also never been disappointed by their model selections. White, black, Latina, Asian, they’re all great. It’s also worth mentioning, over the last few months, In The Crack has added a few lesbian sets. Their lesbian sets are often considered the best in porn and I agree.
Here is the easy way to use In The Crack, look at the top of the page and click, “Collections”. That’s how I do it. The scenes are listed in descending order from the newest to oldest. I just go through and download every scene, every photoset and there’s no hesitation. The content is that good and it’s that consistent. I guess you could call it Simplified Porn.
Of course, while the content is simple to know what to download, joining isn’t as simple. I’ll help you out again, the $34.95 tier is the lowest priced option to receive downloadable zips for the photos. That’s the one I join. You also have downloadable videos and a monthly download limit of 300GB. You can go up to $39.95 tier and will receive the 4K downloads on top of everything included at $34.95 and the $39.95 tier includes a monthly download limit of 500GB. For those that want completely unlimited and access to 4K, too, there is the $69.95 tier. It has everything included and no monthly limit.
In The Crack makes some of the most explicit and kinky masturbation porn look classy. You don’t need a plot with their content. It’s all right there on the screen. The plot is all the things your mind is thinking about doing to the model. The models even move a little slower, smoother and are somehow 100% feminine, even with something up their butt. It’s sites like In The Crack that remind me of how much I enjoy porn but sadly, In The Crack also reminds me of how overproduced and glossy the mainstream is in porn.
I have tried finding faults. I have inspected the photos in their highest quality state but no faults. Oh, there is that one lesbian video from the early years of In The Crack’s life that has the sound muted. They even point it out before you download it. It’s as good of a site as I have ever joined.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- No site has flirted with 100 more than In the Crack but I have still yet to give it a 100. I think the average for In the Crack from me has been around 96 for about 12 years.
- This review is based on the In The Crack Plus membership which is $34.95/mo. It has everything I want and “need” with a membership. Bottom Line will have details.
- One of the few sites that will leave you torn between wanting a hot model and a nice vacation.
- In my opinion, the best quality photos and videos available from any site.
- Though there are lesbian scenes here and there, the majority of the site is solo content and that’s why it doesn’t get a 100 from me. Solo is my favorite. I may be a little biased. It is the best solo site on the internet.
- Fast downloads (see bottom lin
Cons:
- The tiered pricing is sure to bother some people. I admit, the first time I joined with the tiered pricing, I received the membership that doesn’t include zip downloads for pictures and was quite annoyed.
- Let’s nitpick, the site itself still looks like it did in 2012 and maybe 2007. Does that bother me? Not at all.
Bottom Line:
I have talked about the greatest compliments I can pay a site, and In the Crack has several of those distinctions. I was first a member when they were still having audio problems. The videos, the close-ups, the ways the models are presented, have all been copycatted. But none can fool me into thinking I’m looking at an In the Crack photo or video set. Take a look at their scenes. Tell me a site that has those colors in their scenes, those backdrops, those angles, those shadows, those what are they called? Women? It’s the prettiest porn site in the history of internet porn. Don’t shy away. This is not some run of the mill artsy, glam site. With all the prettiness and perfect colors, one could assume the action is safe and glam. Then you see a model do a split across a bathtub and see how many bathroom objects she can shove in herself. No hole is sacred. No emotion is either. Happiness, sexiness, arrogance maybe, and writhing, pulsating orgasms.
In the Crack hasn’t made it this long without being good at something. Count the years, over 20, and they were always at the top of the industry in quality. It's that unique, it’s that high of quality. And the models put on their best performances. I have a whole list of models that had their best performance on In the Crack. I said it in a previous review. Once you join In the Crack, you may not ever join another site.
I don’t remember when the tiered pricing started but I will say it’s not like the tiers or add-on prices that other sites use. In the Crack played it ethically and to help the potential members. Before the tiered pricing, In the Crack, was $34.95/month. They don’t do promos or coupons. They don’t need to. Their content speaks for itself. The tiered pricing was a move to help potential members. I’m sure they knew that the $34.95 price was steep to the average porn site member. They came out with the basic membership. It’s like a trial and it’s $9.95 for a full month. You can stream any of the videos in SD. You can also view the “small” resolution pictures. Not many sites do that. They’re giving people a chance to experience their content without spending $35. The next step up is a logical one, it’s called Stream. It’s $19.95 and you can stream in SD and 720p. You also can view the large pictures. The next step up was the one that got me awhile back. It’s called Standard. It lets you view all sizes of pictures; stream all sizes AND you can download the 720p videos. That’s where they got me. I didn’t realize you can’t download the pictures. The standard is $24.95. There’s something else to add to this. Starting with Standard, there are download limits. Those are listed on their site. They’re very upfront about it.
For me, since my one mistake of joining Standard, I don’t even fool with looking at the tiers. I want downloads on pictures and videos. You have to jump up to the Plus membership. It’s $34.95 the same price their site was before the tiered pricing. The Plus gets me everything I want. It has 720p and 1080p downloads. The big pictures can be downloaded in zips and it is the membership that will give the non 4K fans, the best experience. They have two more steps up, the 4K and the Ultimate. The 4K explains what it adds and it’s $39.95. The difference between 4K membership and Ultimate is the download limit. I don’t find their limits to be a problem. The Plus equals out to 300 GB per month. I usually hit about 80-150 GB per month on it. I do think the only way the limits really matter is if you have to have 4K. In that case, it’s probably best to join the Ultimate. It’s unlimited and you get 4K. The cost of it may make you decide you don’t have to have 4K. It’s $69.95/mo. If you have a fast internet connection and want 4K, I would do the Ultimate. Set aside a month per year just for In the Crack. It’s what I do.
You will see models’ prettiest content and possibly dirtiest content on this site. You don’t like pictures? Try the pictures from In the Crack. The only thing that stops the 100 is I know the price combined with tiers is just not going to set well with some people. The content itself is an easy 100. I wouldn’t even suggest them to change their tiers or price. It’s something you have to try and see for yourself that if (enter site name) is worth $19.95/mo, In the Crack is worth $34.95 or more per month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- In my opinion, in 2018, one of the top 3 porn sites on the internet.
- Tiered memberships let you pick your level of quality and what all you can download.
- A fair but limited "cheap" option of $9.95, will go over the options in BL.
- If you're on this site it's for the models. Few if any sites regularly, consistently come up with so many high level models.
- Picture sets here are some of the best you'll find, including the production qualities with settings, clothing, even the colors.
- Updates every 3 days, each update includes videos, pictures and streaming "mini-vids".
- Download speeds are very high for me (90% and up of my max).
- A big site considering it's mostly solo models.
- CCBill is the biller.
- I join once a year for 1-2 months and download the content that has been released since my last join. I download and keep every set.
Cons:
- The tiered membership options won't be a favorite of some. Be sure to read in the BL to avoid a mistake I made last year.
- The older content had more of the gyno-style of porn but the newer isn't as bad, though it's still "In the Crack".
Bottom Line:
When I first started reviewing porn sites, I had standards, criteria but that was 12 years ago. I'm older now and probably dumber! What I do know though, every year around the American holidays, I join In the Crack. I do that because I'm always off some of December and it let's me download more than in other months. I won't call this the best site but I will say it's one of the top 2-3.
Porn, like so many other things, has tried to adapt to the consumers wants. Not In the Crack. They are still shooting the same porn they shot in 2001. It's 90% or more solo. The models look better here than on any site. The settings on this site are better than any other site. And every scene starts with the model fully dressed in appropriate clothes. Their makeup is near perfect and natural looking. The lighting is even top-notch. The only thing I could complain about with the content is it can be gynecological. But tell me, if you were told you were going to be a beautiful models gynecologist would you or I really complain?
One of my favorite parts is ITC is generally very selective of their models. And the ones that do good have multiple sets. An example of a model that they have multiple sets of who I think is fairly popular in mainstream porn, Gina Valentina, I've looked her content up on other sites but never downloaded and kept it. Her sets on ITC are some of the best on the site. I've always mentioned sites that make the models happy and how they seem to get better performances from the models. ITC does that.
The tiered memberships can be confusing, they have 6 tiers. I'll try to separate them:
Basic, Streaming and Standard all have major restrictions. The first two have no downloads of photos or videos. Standard has no photo downloads but does offer 360p and 720p video downloads.
Plus, 4K and Ultimate offer downloads of everything with Plus being my choice ($34.95), 4K just gives 4K videos on top of the Plus options. Ultimate ($69.95) brings in the next limits. It's completely unlimited. Standard, Plus and 4K have DL Limits (hourly, daily, monthly). Years ago, that was a major no-no but I have no problem staying within the limits. I download the 720p versions of the videos, most files average 450MB. I could easily run through 10GB (Hourly limit on Plus) in 15 minutes but because I am only downloading the last year's content, I only need to average about 4 sets/models per day, about 6GB. If I had never been a member and wanted to get all the content, I would pay for the Ultimate.
This content is unique because it's solo porn that starts out with the models looking very pretty, feminine even, lady-like and ends with them shoving their fist in themselves or a huge dildo. They cover everything in-between from teasing in their clothes (upskirts, bending over) to light touching and masturbation to the more "hardcore" masturbation. They're not in a rush like most 2018 porn seems to be.
It kind of makes me feel old as I start to tell about having to walk through 12 inches of snow to get to watch nicely-paced, erotic porn.
Not only are they the best at what they do but I'm not even for sure they have much competition these days. I wouldn't compare them to FTV since this is a little more personal than FTV. It's you and the model.
Navigation is as easy as possible. Coming up with a content count is a little harder. They've been releasing roughly 10 scenes per month since 2008. Before then they released usually 1 set per month and that goes back to 2001. It's well-over 1,200 scenes.
It's worth mentioning that I did not take points off for the split videos. They, like FTV, shoot each video with an action in it, then they split the video for the next action. It does allow you to download your favorite parts that way. I really don't know if I would prefer full videos but I'm okay with the split videos now.
I kept looking for 1 point to take off and found it while working on the review. The site logs me off about every 20 minutes. How is that for nitpicking?
This is very much a premium site. I know to some it's not premium, some will even hate it because they want hardcore or they want something ITC doesn't do but for me, a person who is rarely that happy with porn sites in 2018, it's perfect because it does what it says. It does it better than anyone else does. It reminds me of when you buy a music album and you don't have to skip one or two songs. For me, they get everything right. Except logging me off every 20 minutes.
In a few weeks, I'll have all of the 2018 content downloaded from ITC and this speaks to how much I like their content, I'll still be stopping by their site monthly to see who the new models are. I don't get that with other sites. I used to but now there's only 3-4 sites that get my attention throughout the year and ITC is one. I was due a 99 and honestly can only think of one other site that I would score this high.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Arguably the most consistent and at this point, possibly the best non-hardcore, solo with some lesbian scenes, site on the internet.
- Updating roughly twice per week.
- CCBill is the billing processor.
- One of the better ranges of races in models. Just in the last month they've had Asian, black, Indian, Latina and white models.
- Premier models, you rarely if ever see an unattractive model on this site.
- I personally like the tiered pricing. I do the $34.95 option and am always satisfied with the content I get with it.
- Video quality is crystal clear even on 720p, photo sets are just as good. Videos go up to 4K, but you have to choose that tier to get those (costs more).
- Production values, settings, outfits, lighting, camerawork, the models performances are all top-notch.
- Navigation is excellent and very easy to use.
- Will have to explain this one in the bottom line, will call it a "hard drive of their own".
Cons:
- Some won't like the tiered memberships. I will try to explain them with examples of what you can get with them.
- Videos are in parts, this is something I've gotten used to and don't mind since there are some parts I wouldn't watch anyway.
Bottom Line:
In the Crack has consistently scored over 95 for me. I just don't know of a site that makes one great scene after another and it's something I've mentioned before, there are models here that I never paid much attention to on other sites. Their content here is much better. Ashley Fires is the best example.
The tiered pricing. The first thing to know is the first time I joined In the Crack, I want to say 2007 or 2008, it was $34.95. I don't remember if they had download limits back then or not. The $34.95 option is what I still join. It gives you all photos, view and download (small and large sizes), it gives you all video download options except 4K. The download limit with it is 10GB per hour, 30GB per day and 300GB per month.
Since the videos are split into parts, I'll use the newest Cindy Starfall, I download the 720p versions. All four parts that make up the full scene are a combined 1.1GB. That's for right at 40 minutes of video. If I went up to 1080p it would be around 2.3GB for those 4 parts.
If you're content with 720p, you can realistically download 250 or so models scenes in a month. Which goes back to the pro I call, "hard drive of their own". I have every In the Crack scene up to January 2019 that I want. I join once a year and can easily get the all of that year's scenes and stay under the download limit. I actually think I could do the 1080p versions and stay under it.
What it amounts to is if you have no In the Crack collection, you might as well take the plunge and join the unlimited for a month. It's $69.95 and you can download all you want including 4K. Their scenes date back to 2001. Once you're caught up, you can easily get by with the $34.95 membership once per year and get caught up.
The models here are not only some of the prettiest on any site they do more here, there's anal play from models that normally don't. There's very hard masturbation from models that normally don't. There are flexibility poses, sexy outfits, there's so little to complain about, I had to find two cons that other people might be bothered by.
I wouldn't call this a glam site since the actions within the site are not what you see on glam sites. But the models are typically made up very nicely and many of them look like they're about to go on a really nice date. The photo sets are a big part of my enjoyment. The Cindy Starfall photo set has around 80 pictures. Of the first 10 photos she's fully dressed, looking really cute and sexy, the next 15-20 have her sexually provocative poses with only her hose stopping you from seeing her fully nude ass and pussy, then the rest of the set she's removed the hose and eventually is fully nude and masturbating. That is a lost art in today's porn. There's posing, teasing, fully clothed, and everything that made pre-tube site "nude, nude, nude" hardcore porn, great.
They have 1,591 scenes, usually a minimum of 30-40 minutes of video in each of those and a photo set with each.
The one change that I have noticed is the scenes continue to go away from the gynecological style the site was known for in the earlier days. They still live up to their name of In the Crack with some extreme close-ups, including during masturbation but you spend more time looking at the outside of the model's orifices than than the inside of them. It's like taking a very artsy site with all the beauty those bring and deciding to suddenly make it a hardcore masturbation site.
Very few sites can pull this style off and I'm certain at this point that none have been doing it longer than In the Crack. On those tiered prices, something I always thought was a nice option for those that haven't been a member is the $9.95 option. You can view the small pictures and stream the SD versions of the videos. That's better than most sites trials and it's 30 days with no limitations on how much you stream. They also have a $24.95 option that lets you download up to the 720p versions, but you can't download the pictures. I do think the $44.95 tier is a problem. It adds 4K downloads but you still have a download limit and those files are huge. I think if you have to have 4K, you might as well join the unlimited plan. I'm completely fine and content with the 720p version and downloadable photo zips so the $34.95 one works fine for me.
They have over 1,000 models and the top models have more than one scene. I think Jynx Maze has 4 and I would rate those 4 scenes in her top 10 scenes of her entire career. Cindy Starfall is another, you could look over my reviews and see where I've mentioned her over the years. Her scenes here at In the Crack are the best of her career. They work some kind of magic there.
I'll end by saying this is one of 3 sites that I could see scoring 100. I haven't ever done that but while not perfect for everyone, they're very close to perfect for me. Highly recommended for those that love to see beautiful, naked women in their most spread open and bent over poses.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Video Quality
Exclusive Video Content
Downloadable zip files
Updates regularly 5 days per week
Cons:
None unless your not a lesbian lover then its a con for you.
Bottom Line:
In my humble opinion this is the lesbian of lesbian sites. There are not a lot of lesbian sites that bring this much quality or content. I would say it would take 3 months worth day and night to download everything from this website. Another website from the SapphicCash.com team recognized for OnlyCuties and InfocusGirls. The video content range from 20 to 30 minutes you can download them in short clips via .mpg or the whole movie with .wmv. The videos are all exclusive so you know your not getting some copied material from some other website or movie. The photos themselves are hi-res that are 1024x768 all in one convient zip file. Though I wasn't really interested in the photos since I was concentrating on the videos. I only bought 1 month subscription and only downloaded 1/10 of the site. This is definitely recommend for anyone who loves lesbian porn from good o'l Eastern Europe. The girls are lovely and most of them are barely legal and new faces to the industry.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Amazingly attractive women from the former Eastern block
- Near HD quality video
- frequent updates
- Good navigation options
- Great hardcore lesbian action
- Reasonable price
Cons:
- Not much variation in storyline
- The oldest videos have so-so quality (not many)
Bottom Line:
Do you enjoy the beautiful models on the softcore sites but wish they were in more hardcore scenes? That's what this site is all about. Pure lesbian action with hot girls.
The sex scenes are believable and arousing. SE keeps toys to a minimum, which I like. The lack of vagina spitting is also a big plus. The biggest surprise I had from this site is the amazingly hot girl-on-girl make-out sessions. Not something you see much in porn.
This was my first pay site and it's still the best.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Beautiful Czech models spreading, gaping, fisting, and playing with toys, often with a big smile
+you can preview the whole site
+clean, well-designed website with no ads or upsells
+billing through CCBill a top tier reputable biller
+videos in four sizes (4K, 1080, 720, 540)
+picture sets in 2400, 1600, 1200 px
+updates six or seven days a week (see bottom line)
+model bios and very entertaining scene descriptions
+excellent tag system with searchable tags and filters
+excellent photography
+excellent community with comments, surveys, and ratings of models
+Site owners listen
+full downloads
Cons:
-mostly Czech models, so very little ethnic diversity
-repetitive sets
-no bonus or network sites
Bottom Line:
This is my second review of PJ Girls and I have to be honest--this is one of my favorite porn sites on the internet. It's small and has niche content, but it sticks to it's niche well, the content is excellent, it never misses updates, and the site owners listen to the members. I'm even more impressed with the site two years after my last review. So many sites drop off in quality over time, but PJ Girls hit it's stride early and has kept up bringing us fantastic Czech models showing every inch of their pussies.
The site itself is clean and well-organized, even if not flashy. It has no upsells and no ads, so there's nothing to distract from the content. There are multiple ways to filter content--by content type, model type, pussy type, model name, or by tag. This can be further sortable by date, downloads, comments, or rating. In all the content is easy to find, and easy to preview. You can preview the whole site without being a member, but downloads are for members only. It does mean you can check out all the content you want before joining--a rarity nowadays.
Technically the site downloads quickly (100% of my max speed). It has four sizes of video, including almost all but the oldest content in 4K. It has three sizes of picture files.
The site updates alternating videos and picture sets every day except Sunday (bonus content is released on Sundays). Bonus content is available to members after three continuous months of membership. The videos are generally about 15 minutes in length, and picture sets around 100 pictures.
The models are generally Czech, with a large majority of them young, thin, and pretty, though there are some MILF and mature models, and some "thick" models. But the vast majority are white. The models seem eager to spread for you, often with a big smile.
The site allows up votes and down votes, and a favorites option for each set. Comments are common, and the user base very avid and enthusiastic. The site owners are respectful, helpful, and listen to their users.
It's a great site. It's niche content, but it sticks to its niche and provides lots of great content. They've not dropped off a bit in two years, and I have to up my score from a 96 to a 98. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED if you like spreading, gaping, and some fisting.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Very complete preview pages.
-Bills through CCBill, the very best and most reliable biller.
-Updates every other day for videos as well as for photo sets. Great for a niche site.
-Nice mix of ages and body sizes. Teens to MILFS, skinny to BBW.
-Most scenes are available as first rate 4K.
-Huge archive of more than 1100 videos and a photo set for every video.
-The scene descriptions are extremely complete and detailed.
-There is a quick download link that works well.
-The webmaster is very hands on and answers emails quickly
-Top quality bonus videos and photos for long term members after 3 months.
-Extensive tag system that is very interesting. See below.
-Nine language choices.
-No download limits
Cons:
-Not much ethnic diversity. Almost all models are thin, white and from the Czech Republic. This is to be expected from a European site.
-I would have preferred less toy use
-Standalone site with no extras, but the archive is so big you may not care.
Bottom Line:
There are some people that grow on you. The more you know them the more you like them. I am that way with this site.
This is my third review of this site. I still am amazed at how well done it is. The porn world is full of big megasites that produce tons of content and have a big staff. This is a small independent. They have managed to take a disadvantage and make it a plus. The customer service is second to none. They listen to the members and take advice well.
The site describes itself as the masters of gaping. It is an accurate description but the name tells you nothing about the content. Usually in porn gaping refers to anally, especially after a lot of ass play or anal sex.
Here the gaping is vaginal. What you get are videos and photosets of women gaping their vaginas, using fingers, devices such as speculums, dildos, and Magic Wands. Many of the models get visibly turned on by the scenes. In the archive of over 1100 scenes there are 254 tagged as juicy. You see wet vaginas, a result of explicit, erotic exhibitionism on film. I love this, the fact that they are turned on by making me hot.
The tag system is very effective. There are 42 helpful tags. The pussy ones are incredible. They have tags for shaved pussy 935 videos, trimmed 295, hairy 33, huge 398, tight 177, juicy 254, which is a wet pussy as they are turned on, and tongue 89. They describe tongue as being located at the very bottom of the vaginal opening (near the anus) and this pink part has the shape of a triangle or a tongue. It's probably a residue of the hymen. The shape of this 'tongue' differs from woman to woman and its appearance is rare, at about 10% of women, the site explains. They say even when it exists, its visibility depends on the pose, lighting, angle or width of gaping.
.
I was expecting the videos to suffer from being formulaic, but that is not really true. In some there are toys, but not all. In some there is some masturbation, but not all. In some there are two women. Sometimes both gape, but in some the model remains clothed, but gapes the other one.
My only complaint is very subjective as I would have preferred less or even no use of toys.
For the most part the models are first rate, well known prominent Eurostars. Some I recognized are Cindy Shine, Angel Wicky, Antonia Sainz, one of my all time favorites Satin Bloom, exotic superstar Lady Dee, Victoria Sweet, Paula Shy, Lexi Dona and Angel Piaff,
Jasmine Webb and Alisha Mae are black UK models and Cristina Miller Latina. Now if they only got Apolonia LaPiedra from Spain, I would give this site a 100. Just kidding as one model is not worth adding a few points.
Some videos and photo sets are available only to members after a three month or more membership. They are added once a month and are absolute top quality.
The preview tour is open and very complete. The member’s pages are easy to use and uncluttered. There is no advertising. The scene descriptions are very complete, detailed and are very comprehensible in English. No ridiculous and laughable machine translations.
Navigation is simple and I found no download limits or broken links or other problems. There is a choice of nine language options. I have never seen this many on another site. They are English, German, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Japanese, Polish and Czech.
I will pay this site a rare and high compliment. I will sign up for another year as it is worth it. I never do that. One month and on to the next one is my style.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bills through CCBill
-Updates every other day for videos as well as for photo sets.Great for a niche site.
-Nice mix of ages and body sizes. Teens to MILFS, skinny to BBW.
-Most scenes are available in great HD as well as first rate 4K.
-Huge archive of 1112 videos and a photo set for every video.
-Thorough complete preview tour.
-Very complete preview
-Very responsive webmaster and excellent customer service.
-Top quality bonus videos for long members after 6 months.
Cons:
-Not much ethnic diversity. Almost all models are white from the Czech Republic. This is to be expected from a European site.
-Too much use of toys which is a matter of taste.
-Nearly every scene has 45 degree camera angles for at least part of the video.
-Standalone site with no extras, but the archive is so big you may not care.
Bottom Line:
The site describes itself as the masters of gaping. It is an accurate description but the name tells you nothing about the content.
What you get are videos and photosets of women gaping their vaginas, using fingers, devices such as speculums, dildos, and Magic Wands. Most of the content, videos and photos are very explicit and entertaining in an erotic way. For the most part the models get turned on by the scenes.
I don’t recall any sites that I could possibly fairly compare it to. Some photo sites can be explicit, but their videos are dull. Here the videos are the stars of the site. With an archive of 1112 videos and photosets, you get a lot for your membership.
I was expecting the videos to suffer from being formulaic, but that is not really true. In some there are toys, but not all. In some there is some masturbation, but not all. In some there are two women. Sometimes both gape, but in some the model remains clothed, but gapes the other one. There are no scenes that I know of that show explicit lesbian sex. Some are indoors, some are not. Some are even in a car. I found the best are the ones shot under a bridge. Many models are Czech, but some are not, and a very few are not even white. There are teens and MILFs, some are skinny and some are a bit large.
For the most part the models are first rate, well known seasoned prominent Eurostars. Some I recognized are Cindy Shine, Angel Wicky, Cristina Miller, Antonia Sainz, Alisha Mae, Jasmine Webb, Satin Bloom, Lady Dee, Victoria Sweet, Paula Shy, Lexi Dona and Angel Piaff,
Jasmine Webb and Alisha Mae are black and Cristina Miller Latina.
The performances seem to turn the women on. Sometimes you an easily see them getting wet and enjoying themselves. There is nothing left to the imagination.
Some videos are available only to members for a three month or more membership. They are added once a month and are absolute top quality.
The preview tour is open and very complete. The member’s pages are easy to use and uncluttered. There is no advertising.
Navigation is simple and I found no download limits or broken links.
The customer service is excellent. The webmaster answered my questions very quickly and politely.
Sometimes the download speeds were at a crawl, slow enough that some links timed out. I recommend that they need to upgrade if they want to grow.
The site is worth joining as I see it as close to perfect. However, it may not be for you as it is very explicit. I could not call it soft core.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Includes 3 female-centric sites, Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink and Fist Flush. A total of 2,400 scenes. These include a video and high-quality photo set. You may download all.
They have 1,150 of the prettiest women I have ever laid my eyes on.
Billing company changes, I sometimes get Rocketgate, sometimes Epoch, both are easy to use and cancel.
Fist Flush has not been updated since 2018 and only has 77 scenes on it, the content they have is good, but if you're only joining for it know ahead of time it's not being updated.
There's some serious gay for pay going on, some of the scenes feel like neither woman wants to be there.
Bottom Line:
When Sapphix was created it was one of the greatest days in female-centric porn. You get the archive site Fist Flush for those into the rougher fisting (only girls, no guys), you get Sapphic Erotica, one of the greatest lesbian sites ever created and you get Give Me Pink, a solo, but hardcore solo site.
The video quality and options are as good as any site I have seen.
Sapphic Erotica has been offering 4K downloads on every scene since October 2015. If you don't want 4K they also offer 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They have been offering 1080p since 2007!
Give Me Pink has been offering 4K downloads since November 2015 and those also come with 1080p, 720p, 540p and two mobile device options. They too have been offering 1080p since 2007.
Fist Flush's few newer updates offer 4K and all of their past scenes have 1080p, 720p and 540p.
Each scene includes a photo set that is up to 3000 resolution. These can be downloaded as zip files.
Gay for pay does hamper some of the scenes, but I would estimate it at less than 15% of the scenes. Most of the scenes on Sapphic Erotica are believable enough to make a girl wonder about the talk of bi-curious.
Give Me Pink could be a little much for some as there are extreme insertions, but I have noticed those are in the older scenes. The newer scenes are more standard "hard masturbation".
Fist Flush is a site about fisting. I'm not really into this scenes myself -- they even have anal fisting.
It does offer a varied selection from scene to scene, the kissable, lovable, innocent tribbing of the cute, pretty and even beautiful lesbians on Sapphic Erotica, the harder masturbation of the Give Me Pink girls and the whole fist of Fist Flush.
The tagging system here is really incredible. As many as you want can be used at one time.
It starts with Categories - here you have anal, kissing, 69 and 26 other choices.
Now you get Locations - They have living room, outdoors, pool and 9 other locations.
Next is Face Type - baby face, slutty, butch and 6 more types of faces
Bringing Ethnicity in now - Exotic, Hispanic, Caucasian and Black
How about Hair Color - redhead, brunette, blonde and 3 more
Need more for hair fetishes, Hair Style - short, long-curly, long-straight and 4 more
Can't forget those sexy Eyes - blue, grey, brown and green
What about the body art - tattoos, piercings, branding and glasses
Like some Pubic Hair - shaved, trimmed, hairy
Can't forget the pussy/labia type - small, medium, meat curtains (really?), big clit
Ethnicity wasn't enough, Skin Tone - light, medium, dark, tan-lines
Thought they forgot the Breasts - natural, flat, floppy, fake, perky, large, teardrop, medium
But don't forget the Butt - thick, bubble butt, apple, average and flat
What good are those without Body Type - athletic, curvy, MILF, petite, tall, barely legal and more
Who needs Clothes - costume, bikini, jeans, hot pants, dress, heels, sneakers, fully naked(invisible clothes?), leggings, hose, stockings, pajamas and more.
Last is the site - Sapphic Erotica, Give Me Pink, Fist Flush
You can go through all those options and mark everyone you want to see and it will filter down to the scenes with everything you marked. I think it's why I like the site so much. There is no guessing. You can literally select what you want to see and it will be there.
Sapphic Erotica has 1,798 scenes, Give Me Pink has 391 scenes, Fist Flush has 77 scenes and they do have interviews, but there are only 59 of those.
In my opinion, they have the best all-around experience in porn -- the quality, the quantity, the excellent tagging system and the quality of models.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Only top girls
- HD vids (recently), but the old ones are at good resolution and bitrate
- Man behind camera knows what he's doing. I bet they were first with this type of close shots
- Content exclusive
- Weekly updates
- Good download speeds, download managers allowed
Cons:
- No network option. They have a site that gathers content from all sites but its old
- Beware trial because it will give you very limited access (1 full video as far as I remember)
Bottom Line:
I don't have to hide I'm a fun of Dev8 sites.
This site is just about girls showing their inside but still makes you want more. I am no longer a member but will return some time for sure. A must have in your collection.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-Very authentic looking action
-Models are attractive
-Excellent Video Quality
Cons:
-Older photo sets aren't very good quality.
-It's more "Lesbian Love" than "Lesbian Action"...
Bottom Line:
If you like lesbian, this site is a must. At the time I was a member it was VERY reasonably priced, and worth every penny.
The action is excellent, and the women really seem to enjoy themselves.
Recently they have pledged to offer near-HD videos on all their video updates (960x540, not quite 1280x720) but I must admit that for the filesizes, the quality is excellent.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Scenes between the girls are passionate and have a more intimate feel than girl-girl scenes on most other sites. The sex is genuinely hot!
- The girls are young, beautiful and natural looking.
- Scenes are well lit, in focus and have few distractions.
- A rarity in most sites, the sound quality is actually good.
- Recent addition of HD feature is great for those with speedier connections.
- Easy to navigate and good search features.
Cons:
- Not all content is exclusive.
- DVD and other paysite ads are distracting.
Bottom Line:
Sapphic Erotica is THE place for genuinely erotic girl-girl action. The price is great and there's more than enough content to last through a month's membership. One of the few rare sites you can sign up for and just let renew.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Beautiful Czech girls gaping, fisting, and inserting toys
+Clean homepage with no extraneous crap
+Some 4K videos, but all high res
+Updates 6 days a week, Monday-Saturday. Alternating one picture set and one video set each day.
+Free tour of whole site
+Screencaps on each video and previews of each photo set let you preview the action throughout the scene/set
+Model bios
+Distinctively named scenes, all dated and with performers in the download name. A breeze to organize
+Variety of file sizes and picture resolutions
+The models look you in the eye and smile as they gape
+Each video has a nice little blurb about the scene which is fun to read
+Active comment section
+Filters for types of content on homepage. You can filter for photos, videos, recent updates, and favorites, as well as by model name, model type, tags, pussy type, and action
+Great photography and editing. I've downloaded all the videos and haven't seen any out-of-focus or badly lit videos.
+The site owners listen
Cons:
Few, and very minor.
-only mp4 for video downloads
-large file sizes (4k scenes are about 2 GB, HiRes 1920x1080 about 1.5 GB)
-Focus is on Czech girls, so the models are almost exclusively white
-no bonus sites
-occasional "bonus" videos available only to long term subscribers (3, 6, or 12 months)
-picture sets and video sets are different formats of the same scene
Bottom Line:
I love this site. It's clean, fast, beautifully photographed, and has beautiful Czech girls who look you in the eyes and smile as they gape for you. The site is a niche site, but does everything almost perfectly.
It's a standalone site that follows its niche. They bill themselves as a site for "gaping pussies, fisting lesbians, and gyno toys." I'm not super into fisting, so really can't say if it's dropped off some, but they still have a number of recent G/G videos with one girl reaching in and gaping the other's pussy. Each model is different, but there is usually a solo toy set and a solo non-toy set for each girl among their sets.
The photography is crisp, clear, well lit, and well shot. The edits are good. Most sets have no talking, so you can hear the girl's pussy squelch if she does kegels. It's nice to not have extraneous talking by a photographer. But it would be nice to hear the girls talk some.
Most of the girls are young Czech beauties. A few latinas and other European girls make their appearance, but most are Czech. They are typically thin-to-average body types, almost always with shaven pussies, and sometimes with piercings or a few tattoos. They strip, spread, look you in the eyes and usually smile. It's a potent combo. I'd prefer more hairy pussies, and there are a few girls with some pubic hair, but most are fully shaven. There is a short bio of most models, including the names they have performed under other than the one listed. Many are amateur girls, some porn stars, but almost all are beautiful. Most are younger, but there are a few younger MILFs.
There is an update every day except Sunday. They update with a picture set one day, then a video set the next. Content has been constant except a few holidays since January 2013. The sets all have a distinct name, are numbered and dated. The files download with the format "(model name)- (title)-(date)" so it is super easy to organize. The photo sets are the same as the video sets, and a set has a description along with the corresponding video (there is a link to the video in each picture set, and vice-versa). The blurbs are fun to read.
Content can be voted on with a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down, and there is a comments section. There is an active community of avid followers who comment, but that's situational.
Every girl has a home page. There is usually a short bio, with her name, age, height, weight, hair color and eye color. They also give the names the model might use on other sites. Some models have twitter feeds listed too. There's usually a little bio blurb too. All tags from every set the girl has is listed in her homepage, and each set is thoroughly tagged. Each set has previews of the scene, usually six to eight pictures. You can go to the website and preview everything as a nonmember. Only members can download sets or comment. After three months' membership you get access to a small number of bonus scenes. These bonus scenes are part of the regular update schedule, but only members who have the requisite membership can download them.
The scenes are generally filmed in the same apartment in Prague. The site takes care to shift locations so a model doesn't appear in the same room twice, but you will see the same sets a lot. It's a pretty apartment, and they use it well. Some scenes are filmed on the streets in cars, or outdoors in the woods. But most are in the apartment.
I absolutely love this site. It's small and niche, but does just about everything right.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
They have 5,190 videos, these range from studio, homemade, closeup, fantasy and adventure.
These videos -- especially the newer ones -- are more explicit than other sites like the one and I see that as a plus.
Excellent use of artistic representations, the rooms are mostly bare, the light isn't blaring bright and it creates a distant, lonely feeling for the solo model.
They average 10-12 updates per month and as far as I can tell these are all amateurs.
Expresses the beauty of the female orgasm without requiring a perfect or fit body with models of all different shapes and sizes.
Billed through a biller I was not familiar with, GM Bill, but it was easy to use and easy to cancel.
Cons:
The navigation is difficult. They have 12 videos per page, 433 pages.
It is not all solo, they have in the 700 range of girl/girl and boy/girl scenes. That's a tough con to use against them, but the site is I Feel Myself.
Bottom Line:
This site should be joined for more than 1 month. I find the explicit, solo masturbation scenes to be my favorite. There's excellent camerawork that includes perfect sound. You see the women's faces as the orgasm, you hear their moans, you can see some of their orgasms causing contractions.
There's a high amount of voyeuristic quality to the scenes. You get the feeling of the fly on the wall.
I listed the non-solo scenes as a con, but only by definition of the site's name. Some of those scenes are very good. Of all the sites I have joined (not that many), this one has to be in the top 3 for eroticism.
You will find yourself not paying as much attention to how the model looks, or what her body shape and size is, instead, paying attention to her bodily movements, spasms, moans and how her hand carelessly reaches up to squeeze her nipple harder than she probably meant to.
I have told in previous reviews I am not a lesbian. I am not even bi-curious. I am drawn to this content for the natural sexual expression, it could be a man or woman and it would work either way.
The site itself doesn't have a lot to talk about. Over 5,000 videos, there's no model list, the navigation is close to archaic, but they do have ways for you to find the different content. If you find a model you like you can click her name and it will show you if they have other scenes of her. They have the scenes broken into categories including one called "friends" that focus on the scenes with girl/girl content and boy/girl content.
The site doesn't look like it is have been updated in layout style or programming in 20 years, but everything works well.
If I find anything truly disappointing with it it is the multi-month or long-term membership options. They offer a 3 month plan for $70. I am on my 6th week and probably would have been better off joining it for 3 months, but $70 just seems like a steep price to pay upfront.
I also wonder if they have considered making a boy/girl site in similar style. I usually prefer high production qualities. These scenes are probably the most basic I've seen and it works for them.
I'm going to go a little off-track by saying as much as I like the desolate, lonely room, I would like to see more open scenes, maybe outdoors or in a different room, position -- like on the couch or in the bathtub.
The video quality does vary. They have HD videos going back to 2009. I haven't seen any picture sets.
A lot of the older scenes are less explicit, but overall, this site has impressed me in nearly every way. I'll come back to it eventually. The content is worth the price. I would recommend it to men and women alike. This just doesn't feel like a porn site. It feels like genuine, human sexual expression and that's something you just don't see a lot of. Very highly recommended.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the purest, realest porn sites
Women of all ages, body types and experience levels
Really the only story I need porn to have
Artistic, dramatic, all from amateur, sometimes self-shot videos
Scenes are presented how masturbation is – climatic
Takes some time to get used to using the site, but sooner is more likely than later
Cons:
Download limit of 15GB per day. I have tried to hit it but haven’t been able to download more than 10GB per day.
There are no pictures. You can make your own from the videos, but there are no separate photo sets
Bottom Line:
I feel myself deserves an award for being the best and most accurately named site. All the content is about women – feeling themselves. I always thought this site sounded boring. It’s not. I was just dumb. Really dumb. There is so much beauty and eroticism in the videos. From seeing goosebumps on a young woman’s thighs, to seeing a woman quiver and shake with a screaming orgasm. I got the feeling a lot of these women didn’t even know how loud or vocal they are. This is one of those sites that what’s missing may be the biggest positive. There are no naked men or balls or dicks or preparation for the money shot. I have to believe the women on this site feel different about shooting these scenes than women being filmed in hardcore scenes.
At the core of the content, you are watching a woman with an exhibitionistic side performing for the camera and how many ever eyes she wants to fantasize is watching. I believe that is true. You see raw emotions. You feel the orgasms. You can even see the orgasms as contractions get in time with body quivers.
And that is the only story I need from porn. A woman wants to orgasm and wants me to watch her. No need for attempted acting or even acting natural. There is no acting on this site. It’s all real. Every orgasm, toe curl, nipple squeeze, moan, shriek, it’s all real. If I stopped right there, I would feel confident about scoring this site between 95-100.
I’m stopping there. There are close to 6,000 videos. There’s nothing to talk about with the videos except the 1080p download option.
The settings alone could be a part of story. Most of these look like a woman at a hotel or her own bed, masturbating and showing off her orgasms. I don’t even pay attention to if they have clothes on to begin the scenes. I don’t care if they are fully dressed. The thrill from these scenes has to do with watching the woman reach blissful ecstasy. Her insecurities, moral beliefs, are all removed for a 10-30 second eruption of orgasms.
I find myself surprised by how little the nudity or lack thereof doesn’t truly affect the scenes and their hotness. Women masturbating in their panties is a lot hotter than I thought it was. It’s because these women are really masturbating and not just performing for pay.
The most attractive part of any of the scenes for me is when the woman is masturbating. She looks at the camera and you can see her legs spreading more like she was shy, but it feels too good to be shy. There is a lot of the feeling of these models reach a point, in nearly every scene, where nothing, but that orgasm matters to them.
The people who own this site also own Beautiful Agony and I Shot Myself. Beautiful Agony is similar to I Feel Myself except it is nearly always focused just on the woman’s face. I Feel Myself shows the face and body trying to fight, hide, restrain, the embarrassing orgasm, leading to the tension, relief and release. You can learn a lot about the human body by watching these scenes. You can see every muscle that tightens up during orgasm.
It's definitely different, but for me, it is the unique one, while other sites try their more complex-view of porn. It likely is the strongest point of I Feel Myself. It’s simple, nothing complex, no dumb story to get in the way and most importantly, no biased director or producer telling the woman how to feel or moan or enjoy or sound.
It's performance porn. The whole world is the stage. The models truly look like they are performing for a sold out group of people.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The most important fact about the site is that it was folded into the Adult Time network.
So if you join Web Young, you should get the Adult Time network for free.
-PU discount $14.95 for the first month.
-Nice-sized content: 413 videos, with matching photosets.
-Photosets have a zip file for downloading.
-Photosets have over 100 photos per set.
-The photos are possibly screen caps, but very good quality.
-Photo dimensions are 1280 x 1920 pixels.
-Nice sets and settings. Sometimes outdoor scenes that are well-photographed that add an element of difference to the regular indoor-shoot. Shooting outdoors can cause problems with the lighting or sound control, but these are professional videos, that handle the technical elements very well.
-Models are young and clean, with very few tats.
Cons:
-The biggest con would be if you joined Web Young, and did not automatically get Adult Time included. You should learn, before joining Web Young (or any of the Adult Time satellite channels/sites), if you are getting Adult Time access as a free add-on.
Many of the sites (including Web Young) do not make it clear on the public site page if Adult Time is included.
Adult Time is one of the best bargains in internet porn, because of the massive amount of high quality content (over 51,000 hardcore videos, over 141 channels/sites).
But they need to make it clear, before you join one of their included sites, whether you get full access to the Adult Time network, as a free add-on. Or whether you have to pay an additional fee for Adult Time access.
-Photosets download with generic filename, that has to be manually re-named to include model-set_title-date_posted_site_name.
Generic filename is 35718.zip or 33018.zip or similar.
-Background music is often annoying.
CONS CONTINUE IN SECTION BELOW:
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Watching the creamy smooth skin of some of these attractive lesbos, you want to cover them with kisses, or, if more energetically inclined, jump on top of them and show them what a man can do. Only in your dreams, of course.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF): Web Young is a lesbian site.
-Most of the models are slender, white, attractive teens with great bodies. Softcore solo masturbation or two girls masturbating or having sex with each other.
The videos are professionally shot: good camera work, good lighting, good colors, good focus and clarity.
And since the girls are mainly young and attractive, you want to not just watch the scene, but be there as part of the action. So it's a tease for a male to watch these horny young lovelies getting their rocks off.
Web Young is a good lesbian site: a large number of attractive models, good professional videos and photosets.
But the main advantage to the site would be the Adult Time access.
Adult Time is like a goldmine of high quality porn: with over 51,000 high quality hardcore videos, thousands of photosets, thousands of porn stars, many of them attractive to lovely.
The Adult Time network, and any site included in the network, needs to make it clear if Adult Time network access is included as a free add-on in the membership of each of their sites.
If the site membership automatically gives you access to the Adult Time network, the value of the membership would score 95, ranking it as one of the outstanding bargains for your porn dollars.
If the site does not automatically give you access to the Adult Time network, and you have to pay an extra fee for Adult Time, then you are basically getting screwed, whether you realize it or not: because the Adult Time network is the gold mine, and if you are only getting access to a single one of its member sites, you are wasting your porn dollars on an inferior product.
It's that simple.
And the people running Adult Time should wake up and make it crystal clear what the policy is:
Do you automatically get Adult Time access with a membership in any one of the Adult Time sites?
Or not?
I'm giving Web Young a score of 95. That is assuming you get Adult Time access as a free add-on. If you don't get Adult Time as a free add-on, the score would drop significantly, because Adult Time is the main value, although Web Young is a fine site.
But since they started the Adult Time network, offering access to such a huge amount of quality hardcore porn across a wide variety of networks and individual sites, I believe the porn world has changed dramatically: For a very low price, you get access to a huge backlog of quality hardcore porn.
I suggest waiting for a holiday special discount before joining, because these holiday discounts save you a lot of money, and seem to be offered frequently.
But even without the holiday special, Adult Time is still worth joining at the regular price, because it's still a great bargain.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Still the most realistic masturbation site out there - no make-up encrusted, siliconed-injected models, just women enjoying themselves
+ Unlike other masturbation sites, the women here don't typically play to the camera
+ The site is moving into Hi-def (see bottom line and my comment at right)
+ Files available in high and low resolution wmv and high and low resolution mov
+ 1000+ episodes up, running an average of 5-10 minute each
+ Daily updates (with one con below)
+ They seem to be getting away from the same old "bird's eye view", dimly lit shoots. More women are doing shoots outdoors and in locations other than a bed
+ The member's forum is as alive as ever, with people commenting on the site and the girls daily
Cons:
- Update schedule is still light with only one episode added per day
- Found out the hard way that there's a 3 gig a day download limit. Go over and you're locked out for 24 hours
Bottom Line:
Well... I still don't have a job but I couldn't resist this one. This has always been one of my favorite sites and I just happened to be checking the site to see what's what. I saw exactly what I'd been looking for - IFM is moving to hi-def! So, the credit card took a hit and back in I went.
As of the date of this review there's about a week's worth of 720x576 video up and I have to say it's a most welcome addition. Bitrates have jumped from 900+ to 1600+ so the files look GOOD. Now I'm eagerly awaiting the the higher resolutions. The updates still just come one a day so I think this is still one of those sites you join, download for the month, then leave to join again after the content has built up. Just be careful when you go back and try to catch up that you don't download more than 3 gigs a day or you get locked out for 24 hours.
Definitely tops in it's niche as it is, if they could get more than an episode a day up, I'd say this site would be about as perfect as you can get.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
-All other masturbation oriented sites fade to a pale pink in comparison.
-The Female orgasm, not a phrase usually associated with porn, is on full display.
-A host of fresh faces. Does anyone claim to have seen these gals elsewhere? Other than its non-nude sister site beautifulagony.com
-Most lose themselves to their pleasures, others stare straight into the lens. Some of each group generate yells and groans that are klaxon-loud. I dare say the building has no mice.
-During the post-orgasm, the sensation overload leaves some barely ambulant as good sex is a gentle cathartic.
-While some don't get naked, I enjoy the slow undressing of those that do. Many begin by rubbing thru their garments & this may continue for some time before blouse, bra and panties are removed at leisure.
Cons:
-Understandably, a vid only site, as moans/groans don't translate well to pics.
-Some updates are merely a previously released scene now shown at a wider crop or via another camera.
-Perhaps two gals old enough to have bought a beta tape. The rest are just past legal age.
-The home page naviagation links are squashed into a small area. I clicked into wrong sections thru out my m'ship.
-Its a one-trick pony site: the desire to film big O's reaches something not far from mania.
-Concolourous sets.
Bottom Line:
-This is one of the tiny number of porn sites whose members aren't 98% male. Don't write that your sexy wife is devoted to Abbeywinters.com or the latest female conquest really grooves to your old downloads of Jeanna Fine fuck-fests. No, I'm guessing this is one of a very few with a sizable m'ship of single females who tracked it down on their own accord. Others would be adultfriendfinder.com and, maybe, hegre-art.com
-If your idea of perfect porn is non-plot fucking conducted at breakneck speed, hup-two-three-four! then you won't incur an erection. If you prefer women being fucked into the floorboards, so hard she ends up with a nosebleed or concussion, this site won't raise your blood pressure.
-A reminder of what gets many women off: fully half don't finger themselves internally, the dildos are small-ish, I don't recall any anal probing. Judging by the twitches and moaning, any desire for cock is a passing velleity compared to the yearning for mons venus stimulation. Gentlemen, take notice.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
