Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- New, fresh, beautiful women.
- High quality video.
- Long videos with LOTS of sex.
- Videos contain a large degree of variety - different sex acts (blowjobs, vaginal, anal) and lots of different angles.
Cons:
- Most videos force these poor women to lick - for a long time - this disgusting guy's disgusting butt-hole. I don't know who finds that sexy, but I think it is absolutely disgusting. Gross.
- The male "talent," (i.e. prop) who is also the camera guy, talk throughout the entire video. And not what you'd expect like asking the girl to talk about herself, etc. They ask stupid questions like "does that feel good?", "am I better than your boyfriend?" and "have you ever had one that big before?" It is constant and is a complete distraction and turn-off. Its gotten to the point where I have to completely mute the videos to watch them or I can't stomach it. Recently, they started using a new prop, whose voice is not quite so whiny, nasal and annoying as the guy who used to do this before, but the new prop still won't shut up and its a big problem.
- Site navigation is very difficult. 5 or so videos per page, in date order, that's it.
Bottom Line:
This site's (lone) redeeming quality is, without a doubt, the girls. They are new, they are young, and they are beautiful. Usually I have never seen them before, or this is the first time I've seen them and I see them again later on. They do a lot of different sex acts (more on this later), sometimes do anal, etc. (The people who complain that the anal is not sexy because the girl is in obvious pain are absolutely correct. I like anal but I completely avoid it on this site).
There are two major problems with this site that make it not worth the $35 to join - first, the constant inane talking out of the male prop. As I mentioned before, its comments like "is that a big dick?" and "tell me you're my little whore". The talking is constant and appears designed to stroke the performers' fragile egos rather than designed to contribute to the video. Originally, they had a guy doing all the videos who not only talked CONSTANTLY, but had the single most annoying voice on the planet. Thankfully, they seem to have replaced him (no doubt after constant complaints from members), but the new guy, while he does not have as annoying of a voice, is no better in the constant blathering department.
But the one thing that drives me absolutely nuts about the videos is these guys' obsession with their own ass holes. I am convinced they are actually homosexuals (not that there's anything wrong with that). The video will be going along nicely, and then all of a sudden, out of the middle of nowhere, its "lick my ass hole baby." Disgusting. Absolutely disgusting. Not to mention degrading to these women. And it lasts a LONG time too - its not just one lick and they're done - no - "more," "stick your tongue in there, baby." How these beautiful models can allow themselves to be subjected to sticking their tongues inside the butt hole of a disgusting guy is beyond me. I hope they're getting paid piles and piles of money for this. This absolutely ruins their videos for me. I mean, if it were in one predictable place, you could at least know to fast forward through it - not that that would redeem the fact that they do it. But it appears at random and there is no way to predict when you're going to get a long, detailed close up of man anus and scrotum. Without this act in their videos, I give the web site a 75. This just ruins it for me - there are no redeeming qualities to this despicable act. I feel so sorry for the models who are subjected to these animals.
Lastly, as others have pointed out but it merits repeating, these guys are chicken to have their faces shown on camera (of course, no problem putting the women on camera, but you get their faces in the shot and they run screaming like little girls). This severely limits the angles (its pov/mounted camera shot, so the angles are already severely limited). While I think they do an ok job editing the videos together, it is still a problem.
All in all, the videos are long, lots of sex, and the quality is decent. But, the incessant talking and the lengthy close ups of disgusting hairy man anus ruin it completely. Not worth the money and I would not recommend spending your hard-earned money on a membership to this train wreck of a web site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Nice new clean look.
MP4 HDV UP To - 1280 x 720 @ 4Mbit (MP4)
Unique Material to this site.
Streaming Material is fast smooth
Many Vids have matching Photosets.
Navigation is good.
Very professional looking site.
Cons:
Older Movies SDV - 640 x 480 @ 964Kbit (MP4)
Photos not accessed on video page.
Search engine did not accurately search.
Downloads on my 50MB connection was average not impressed.
Sameness in shoots.
Bottom Line:
Toads over view:
The site has improved greatly since my last review in 2008. I did notice PU icon is not accurate to the new site format makes one think the site has not updated the look.
I found joining was easy and accessed with no problem. Girls are stunning and very nice bodies.
I was disappointed that most all the girls appeared under 24 and looked award when dressed in clothes for a person in their 30's. But were good non-the less.
Conerns I had:
I disliked the older material, some as old as 2005 and did not look or feel fresh. The newer
material was great and very high quality.
I was troubled by the poor results from a well designed search engine. The look of the search engine looked intuitive and clean but gave bad results. A search for blonds would bring up black hair and blond. Other niches did the same.
I ran a check on my PC and connection several times and took longer per movie then it should on this site.
Toads take:
This is one of the best overall sites out there, the search engine and old material are bothersome but the site over all is clean fresh and feel right. Those issues are the only reasons that kept me in the mid 90's score wise. If the search worked well I would have bumped my score up to 96.
The girls are amazing with many niches this is a girl only site there is some hardcore solo activity and some Lesbian shoots by over all is mostly solo. Allot more outside shoots then I would like, and would not make not of it but the search engine did not omit these well and added to the confusing finding the idea user material.
If you join any solo site make sure you do not miss this one. The unique material alone makes this a high mark site and quality is great except on older material which in my opinion should be archived and not included as total videos the site offers. I was also impressed that each video had picture sets. However in the video section there was " UNCLICKABLE" photos icon and access to the photo was done by a almost missed link. The link is fine but pictures should be clickble to the set. Just some small annoyances but the the site is great and worth the join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Very high quality video and photos - extremely clear.
- Most recent videos (2012) are 1080p, either h264 or WMV format.
- Videos also avail in sd480 and ld360 format
- Variety: Solo, Boy-Girl, Girl-Girl
- Daily updates - usually both video and photo set, although occasionally only one or the other.
- Fairly fast downloads (this depends so much on your ISP that I can only say it felt fast to me.)
- Very cute girls
- Search by “topic”, for example - 69, Bathroom, Dildo, Hardcore, Small Tits, allows selection of multiple criteria.
- Photo sets download in zip files.
Cons:
- I could not get download to work with Free Download Manager.
- Vids have advertisement, short but annoying, for another site.
- Older content, as one might expect, is lower quality / resolution.
- The “ratings” tabs at very top of screen are confusing.
- Photo sets in zipfiles all have the same file names. 001.jpg, 002.jpg, etc.
Bottom Line:
Where to begin? The girls are lovely, beautiful, young! The name of the site is a clear indication of what you may expect. A quick review of the model list shows virtually all are 18 or 19 years old, and European.
In those videos where it is a “boy/girl” scene, even some of the boys are very cute, although I don’t usually focus on the guys, the ones here are worth watching.
Statistics:
- I counted 12 videos listed in a single screen, with the ability to step through 91 screen loads, so that would be about 1092 videos available.
- "The Girls" section had 21 models listed per page, and 17 pages, so about 147 models.
- Photo galleries were 12 per page, and 106 pages so that's about 1272 photo sets or galleries.
I like to save the photo sets in a single directory after downloading, since each file set re-uses the file names of 001, 002, 003 etc within each set, it is an extra bother to have to batch rename each set so that I can store multiple sets in a single directory. I have seen this type of naming at other sites as well, and it may discourage photo set downloads. I would prefer a naming convention of “girls-name, shoot-id, then photo number. For example Karen-02-001.Jpg. But every site has their own methods, this is just a pet peeve of mine.
Another reviewer commented on the relative scarcity of anal sex, and listed this as a negative, it may well be for some viewers, but for others of us this is a positive. Therefore I have listed it in my comments section, as I believe such things are much more in the eyes, or should I say fantasies, of the beholder, rather than attributes of the site. I personally prefer less anal action and more “pussy”.
This site also has live shows, which are clearly scheduled and easy to access. However the video that goes with the live shows if SMALL. If you enjoy the banter and chat, with a number of other guys and the one lady, then you may like this. I found it less than exciting.
I don’t have a very objective scoring system for sites, maybe someone else can suggest a consistent scheme for scoring, so I am going to give this site a good rating simply because I like the videos and found the site fairly easy to navigate. The only real problem that I have had has been the inability to use FDM to control my downloads. BTW it seems to work, but then downloads a very short video that says I am not authorized to download.
The site lists one "bonus site", which contains one girl. There are comments to the effect that the longer you keep your membership, the more bonus sites you will get, but at this point I don't have the benefit of this feature. And if the other sites are like the one bonus that one gets initially, it may not be of particular benefit.
Billing for this site is through CCBill.
Bottom line: The site holds my attention with high quality videos and photo sets. I can let my mind wander, enjoy the beauty of the models, daydream myself into being with them, enjoy a long slow porn watching session. What more could an old guy expect from any site with lovely young ladies.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Independent billing via Epoch with no regional pricing
Gorgeous model with hot body
Exclusive content
Content date stamped.
Update’s with 1 new photo set and 1 new video each week.
Nice high resolution photos, most sets 2000 x 3008px, a few at 1463 x 2200px
Zip downloads for photos
Videos available to download and stream online
Bonus content gives access to another 13 solo model sites.
Cons:
Small site, 27 photo sets (2267 images) and 21 videos to date.
Very softcore, only naked posing.
Photo zips all have the file name “pictures” so renaming required.
Video quality is poor by today’s standards.
Videos are short at around 5 minutes each.
All except 3 of the videos have the same annoying backing track.
None of the extras you might look for in a solo site to add some personality, no model info or “about me” section, no interaction in the form of a diary, blog or cam shows.
Difficult login, a partially obscured captcha where I usually have to refresh the page several times before I get one I can read.
Bonus site access not immediate. They say it can take up to an hour to set up the login for the bonus sites but after 2 hours I still couldn’t access them so sent off a support email, never got a reply but 10 minutes later tried again and the login worked
Bottom Line:
I discovered Victoria Divine listed as a new site while browsing one of my favourite TGP sites a couple of weeks ago and while I’m not normally one for rushing out and spending $30 on a new site with little content the thing that most interested me about this site was the fact it gave access to a bunch of other solo sites including Molly’s Bedroom and Lana’s Fantasies that have been on my “to join” list for a long time. As Molly’s Bedroom bills via CCBill with regional pricing for me the fact I could sign up to Victoria Divine via Epoch meant I was getting an extra site for less money so nothing to lose as far as I was concerned.
According to the site tour Victoria is a 19 year old former fashion model who is venturing in to nude modelling for the first time to help pay her tuition fees, Yeah right! Once inside the members area there is no further information telling you who she is or where she’s from. Once I started browsing her photo sets I got the feeling that she looked familiar so ended up doing some digging around to try and discover where I had seen her before. It turns out she is a Ukrainian model known as Vika R at Met-Art with photo sets on there dating as far back as 2004 so I guess that throws the 19 year old theory out the window. In fact comparing how she looks in those old Met-Art sets compared to these so called recent updates here just makes me wonder how recent the content actually is on this alleged new site.
Another thing that makes me wonder how recent the content actually is at this site is the video quality as it’s certainly not up to the standard you usually see in 2012, it’s not even in wide screen let alone hd. The download options are 720 x 576 wmv or 480 x 360 mp4. The bitrates for both are around 1600kbps. The videos are also quite amateurish, poor lighting, jerky camerawork at times and poor editing. The action is all fairly tame; you get to see Victoria naked but nothing more than that. In one video you get to watch her sat on a sofa fully clothed reading a magazine for 5 minutes, she does get up and walk to the kitchen half way through to pour a coffee and you get a nice view of her ass in a tight pair of jeans. In another video you get to watch her stand in front of a mirror topless brushing her hair for 5 minutes. In some other videos you can watch her rolling around on a bed playing with some stuffed toys and taking a shower and a bath and that’s about as exciting as the action gets. Oh and the same annoying sound track accompanies almost all the videos; if you’re planning a membership here better search youtube first for Magnus Kollberg–My Name is Courtney to make sure you could stand listening to that track 18 times.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Independent biller, choose from Epoch or Segpay with no regional pricing.
Exclusive content
A new update added every other day. In the last month 11 new photo sets and 5 new videos which is typical of most months.
Photos are available in 3 different sizes, small 683 x 1024, medium 1668 x 2500 and original which varies and can be anything from 2136 x 3216 up to 4912 x 7360.
Zip downloads are available in each size.
Photo set cover included in each zip and set name included in file name.
Most videos are in 1280 x 720 hd in both avi and wmv format. The latest wmv updates play at 10000 kbps. The videos also have the option to be downloaded in 1 minute clips or streamed online.
Lots of information provided, model stats and bios, content date stamped, all file sizes shown and run times listed for videos.
Model ratings and user comments allowed.
Excellent browse and search options.
Cons:
Normally I’d list a bonus site as a pro but the Teen Art Club bonus site and bonus Amour GF content adds little value to the site and even detracts from the rest of the high quality content IMO.
Their online flash based photo slideshow viewer is the worst I’ve seen although it’s not something I ever use.
An annoying captcha at login, a line of 5 numbers that rotate in and out of view, first time I’ve seen that.
Every video has the file name “full” so will need to rename everything yourself.
No ethnic diversity amongst the models
Some may consider the site too softcore if you want more than just naked girls posing.
Most of the above cons were not really much of an issue for me personally; the single most irritating thing about the whole site for me was one aspect of the navigation in that hitting the back button didn’t always take you back to the page you came from.
Bottom Line:
Amour Angels is a softcore teen glamour site featuring a fine collection of 562 models and the work of around 90 different photographers. The site has been online since August 2006 and has built up a collection of 999 photo sets and 253 videos to date. The models here nearly all come from either Russia or The Ukraine and all but a tiny handful; are in the 18 to 21 age range. The model collection is not really very diverse; most are slender with small to medium breasts. Using the excellent search engine I established that 90% of the models have a B cup bra size or smaller so if you like your women with a fuller figure you will have fairly slim pickings here
The site is well laid out with plenty of navigation options; you can browse all updates via the year and month listings with separate sections provided for videos, photos, a model index and a photographer index. The main problem I had with the navigation as mentioned in the cons was that whatever section I was browsing after clicking on a model/photo set/video when I hit the back button to return to the page I was on before it would constantly dump me back on page 1 again and I would have to constantly navigate back to where I was. Eventually I got into the habit of “right click open link in new tab/window” to avoid losing my place I tried the site with Chrome to check if it was just a problem with IE but still the same problem exsisted.
They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search models by criteria such as age, eye and hair colours, country and bra size. You can also search the photo and video sets by many different indoor and outdoor locations. Same problem again with the navigation though; click on a set or model in your search results then hit the back button and your search results have disappeared.
The photo sets themselves feature mostly solo girls often starting out either clothed or partially clothed and showing off their naked bodies. Many of the sets feature full explicit nudity with plenty of open leg and up close pussy shots however you won’t find any masturbation or toy use going on here. There are also some 2 and 3 girl sets/scenes that feature some mild simulated lesbian kissing and touching. There’s more or less a 50/50 split between indoor and outdoor locations. One slight negative was that I often found models that had two different photo updates that are clearly from the same photo shoot, i.e. same location and outfit
I much prefer photos and haven’t spent an awful lot of time browsing the videos. I quite enjoyed seeing some of my favourite models like Sunna, Ingret and Anna with the amazing F cup breasts come to life in the videos but the videos actually go on a bit too long for me and I tend to lose interest after about 5 minutes. Take the video of Alya titled “Spring Love” for example, there’s only so long a girl lying on a bed rubbing a tulip over her body can hold my attention and that video goes on for 28 minutes. Most videos probably average 10-15 minutes though and all the ones I’ve watched so far contain background music which I actually prefer to the dead silent ones I’ve come across in several recent subscriptions.
Regarding the bonus content the section titled “Amour GF” is just 15 galleries of 2-10 pictures each and the bonus site Teen Art Club has another 57 photo galleries with maximum resolution of 682 x 1024 and hasn’t updated since 2007.
Overall a fine site for lovers of softcore teen erotica, I just wish they’d fine tune the navigation by fixing the back button.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- video style
- special content
- hard fucks (slapping, rude talk)
- hot girls from Romania and Hungary
Cons:
- not active
- it should be at least 20$ instead of 30$
- regional pricing
- photosets
Bottom Line:
So i am going to write a review for this site, because there hasn't been one for a long time. Thats maybe because of the reason, that this site isn't really active anymore, it suddenly stopped in 2009, thats sad and nobody really knows why, but probably because the company moved from Hungary to the USA, where they started a new project called livegonzo.com. Whatever the main time of the site was between 2006 and 2009, but it's still a good site with great content, worth checking out. TamedTeens is one of these sites which are under the hand by Raul Cristian, like AssTraffic, SpermSwap or AllInternal. Raul Cristian is a very good camaraman with a unique style, which makes his movies special. TamedTeens is a site, where teens are introduced to porn "the hard way", there are dressed up like sexy sluts and fucked pretty hard. Hard means powerfucks, deeptroat, some ass and face slapping and rude talk(every girl is called bitch). So the girls arent threated very nice, but it has style, it's not too much, unhuman or brutal.
So when you want to become a member, you will be charged with 29.95$(USA) and 29.95€(EUROPE) per month, this "problem" for people from Europe is known, but the site is still worth it in my opinion. After the login, you have access to 155 movies, 128 from TamedTeens and 28 from Asstraffic. Most of them are in HD, the first 28 Videos are not. For every movie you get a high quality photoset with 20 up to 50 photos, most of the sets are good, but there are some weak ones too. Also there is a set with about 200 screenshots from the movie, which i really recommend. You can preview the movies directly on the site in low quality, because the site is a little old, the player isn't the best, but its working for quick overview of the movie. When you like one of the movies, i liked a lot of them, than you can download it with four different download options. I prefered the 960x540(wmv) format, the full-HD video is too big, the download would take very long and it would take much space on my disk. The download speed for one movie moves between 500KB and 1000KB, but of course you can download more movies at the same time.
The girls are mostly from Romania and Hungary, some are from Czech, Germany or France, but i "love" the Romanian girls. Most of the girls look good, and some are extremly hot, they dressed up sexy, bikini, fishnet and high heels. However, you can preview everything on indexxxed.com. There you will see Raul Cristians special gonzo style in the movies. Like on most sites, the male actors are a problem, first it's always the same 5 guys and mainly one(Mugur), annoying. Ok, the male actors aren't ugly, good builded and have proper cocks, but sometimes acting like retards, James Brossmann is a good actor. Sometimes Rauls talk can be annoying as well and it mostly isn't very creative.
This site has no user interaction, you can't write comments or write something in a guestbook and there is no customer support.
In the end, i just recommend the site, and when you want to cancel your membership, for example after 2 months, then you get a really great offer.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great network. Naughty America is huge with tons of girls and a new shoot just about every day
- Hot talent Julia Bond, Penny Flame, Haley Paige. Tiffany Taylor
- Easy organization. There are keywords and categories plus a cool "find my fantasy" feature where you can select the most minuet detail of what you want to see.
- pix with zip downloads
- mobile version of site available
- mp4 and wmv formatting. "trailers" available for download so you can "preview" a shoot before downloading it all (useful if you're still on dialup).
- they keep your favorites - even if you laps your membership they maintain this info.
Cons:
- Dead site. Last update was in 2007.
- Only about 40 shoots in this site
- Live shows of amateur are available (but it seem like every girl I like requires an extra charge).
- I've seen some of these girls in other shoots and for some of them, this is not their best work. (bad directing I guess).
- cross sells when you join and ads in member section
Bottom Line:
The network is good. It's a shame this site is not updated any more.
I Love the way they offer discounts to those on their twitter feed/email newsletter.
Bottom Bottom Line: If you join the network, check out this site (there are some hot girls and there aren't that many scenes). The discounts often make it worth it and I can't think of a girl that shoots pro that hasn't done Naughty America. While it's not usually my favorite example of a girls work, you can't argue with the range NA covers. They specialize in fantasy scenes and whether you're looking for nurses, milfs, or teachers - they probably have it here.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The photosets and videos are dated by when they were posted to the site.
-The zip file for each photoset has the name of the model in the filename.
-There is a small bio for each model. Gives her name, age and hair color.
Also gives some background on the model, which is probably fiction.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Good download speed. I got 1.0 to 1.4 MB/sec at this site (which is my maximum download speed).
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Because the videos are so short (3 to 4 minutes runtime), the file size is very small: 50 MB or less.
Cons:
-On login, have to enter a captcha, which is a moving string of 5 numbers. You have to watch the captcha for a minute or two, to try to read all the numbers, since the string is moving on and off the screen. Just a minor annoyance, but it indicates poor site design, along with a bunch of other site design problems. Logging into Met-art or Erotic Beauties, major porn sites, is so easy and effortless. Why can't other sites make it easy to log in?
-Archive site. Stopped updating in 2009.
-Although photosets download with the name of the model and a unique number, videos download with the default filename of "full.wmv" or "full.avi" (depending on whether you chose the wmv or avi file format).
So you have to rename each video you download, to know what model is in the video. And there's no description on the site of what the video is about.
-Navigation is very basic.
-No search function.
-Site only has 3 models. Very limited selection of models.
Bottom Line:
This is a very softcore teen site.
Their model listing consists of 3 models:
Diana, brown hair
Liza, black hair
Nika, blonde hair
I thought at first I was mistaken. Where are all the different models? But those three models are used for all the photosets and videos. So if you
like those three models, you will find plenty of photos and videos with them.
There is very little eroticism. Very little touching themselves. No masturbation. Little or no spreading of the legs. This is really very
softcore. Met-art is the biggest teen softcore site there is, for photographs. But the Met-art photos, if you can imagine, are harder edged than what this site offers.
In a way, that's good. It almost makes you feel like a "clean" pervert looking at these innocent photos of naked teens.
No boys at this site interacting with the girls. This is a girl-only site.
In some of the photosets and videos, there are two girls. But the only touching between the two girls is girly innocence. I mean, these girls
hardly ever kiss the other girl softly on the lips. They are playing around, maybe touching one another's arm or leg. But really innocent. This
is the very softest of softcore.
Site statistics:
Photosets
Number of photosets: 167
Number of photos per set: around 70+
Each photo has 3 sizes: Low Res., Medium Res., Original size. The original size is between the low res and the medium res.
Original res dimensions: 800 x 1200 pixels, or 1500 x 1000 pixels
Each photoset has a zip file option. You can download a zip file in your choice of low res, medium res, or original size.
Number of videos: 88
Video runtime: 3 to 4 minutes.
Frame width x height: 720 x 480
Total bitrate: 6096 kbps
You can download the videos as WMV or AVI files.
There is no choice of definition for the videos. Videos download in one definition only.
The videos are really short. A lot of the videos have a runtime of 3 or 4
minutes. The video file size is small, 50 MB or less.
The videos have more tease to them than the photosets. There is stripping in the videos. But it's done in a girlish way, very innocent, not even midcore, just young teens taking off their clothes and playing in an innocent manner to an unseen audience. No sex, no masturbation, very
little touching of their own body, no spread legs, no close-ups of the groin or ass.
The videos are poor to just OK. The girls go in and out of focus, which is annoying. This is not an artistic effect, but the camera operator just
can't keep the model in focus, even though she is barely moving from one spot to another. The camera operator is definitely not a professional.
There is no story line to the videos, it's just a girl or 2 girls getting naked, moving around, flashing parts of their bodies. They are interacting with the camera, being teasing, but innocent.
The lighting is OK, the colors are OK. These are scenes shot indoors, so the lighting is easily controlled, and there is little or no annoying
random noises in the soundtrack. The soundtrack is canned music, which I wouldn't mind hearing eliminated. But I've heard worse canned music.
The site design and navigation is basic but acceptable. There is no search function. But you have pages listing the photosets, and other pages
listing the videos. The listing shows what model (or sometimes 2 models) is in the photoset or video. But there is no description of what the
photoset or video is about. But then again, it's basically a girl getting undressed, and flashing her body at the camera. That's it. No script, or
story.
I am giving this site a score of 70. But I think, unless you know that this is a very softcore site, with just 3 teen models, and that it hasn't updated in over 3 years, and that the photos and videos are poor or just OK in technical quality, you will be disappointed you spent your money on this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Access to 44 Sites
- Interesting niche content
- Updates daily
- Site might be good for people who use streaming rather than downloads
- Photos available
Cons:
- No usable search function
- No Stars named
- Meaningless file names
- Doesn’t support download managers
- Many scenes appear to be clips but the others in the series aren’t readily identified
- Must wait one minute between downloads
- Files only available in one format and size
- Scenes stream and play automatically
- Photos vary widely in quality
- No zips for photos
Bottom Line:
There are certain porn niches that I really like; two of those are public nudity and group sex parties. This network has several sites that offer material in those niches and since those sites that have this material are relatively rare I often take a chance when I find one. But given the reviews posted here and the information at TBP I should have avoided this site. I’ll skip right to the bottom line now: with a narrow exception, do not join this site!
I’ve said many times that I think for a porn site to be great it has to have good porn, the site needs to be well laid out and finally it has to be easily accessed or downloaded by the user. A lot of sites hit two of those targets but fail on a third and don’t become great sites. They’re stuck at merely good. It is arguable that this network offers good porn. I think they do: some of the material available is interesting and looks pretty good. But on the overall layout of the site and the ease of access by members this site falls flat.
The network is made up of 44 sites. Unlike a lot of other networks that follow a formula, this one has unique concepts for many of the sites. Most of the standard porn niches are covered, like teens , MILFs and cumshots, but rarer niches are also covered here, like feet, pubic hair, drunk girls, BBWs and femdom. What drew me in were several sites that feature a strip club motif and sites with public nudity and group sex parties.
While I like many of the unique niches available here the scenes themselves are just mediocre. In most cases the scenes are quite short. Many of the niche sites have scenes that average less than five minutes. The layout of each site is the same: there are 16 medium-sized thumbnails per page with a short, mostly useless description. Clicking on a thumbnail open that page where the scene starts streaming and playing automatically. This is a pet peeve of mine: I don’t like that it hogs bandwidth and I don’t like the audio surprises that come with sites like this. There is an option to download the scene too. The downloads are only available as mp4s and only in one resolution. That resolution varies from fairly low (720x480 at 1500kb/s) to fairly decent (1280x720 at 3500kb/s). I didn’t download a lot of material so I can’t really say how much is at the higher resolution.
I have a number of complaints about how the downloads are accessed. First, the file names are meaningless, consisting of just a number. I can live with that, but many of them include “part 1” as part of the title, obviously implying that there are other parts. I really don’t like scenes broken into parts in 2012 because for the vast majority of user it simply isn’t necessary, but to make matters worse, if the scenes actually are in clips the other clips in the scene aren’t identified. How do I find them? The name gives no clue and there isn’t even a usably search function if the names had any meaning.
The biggest flaw in downloading is something I’ve never seen before on a website. The site doesn’t allow download managers (which isn’t unique but still a very annoying) but the strange thing is a restriction that you have to wait one minute between downloads. This might not be such a big deal if the scenes were all 1GB files, but since many of the files are only 10MB or less that download in a few seconds, it is annoying to have to wait a full minute to download another. If you aren’t willing to provide reasonable access to your members then I think you really need to rethink your business model.
One bit of good news is that the network does update regularly with at least a dozen clips being added each day.
I can’t tell if the scenes are exclusive or not. I’ve not seen them anywhere else but given the wide variation in quality and the fact that they look like the same kind of clips that are available elsewhere I’m inclined to think that they aren’t exclusive. But I’m certainly open to correction on this point.
The site also offers photos. I didn’t spend a lot of time looking at them but I can report that the quality varies quite a bit and the site commits the serious sin of not allowing zipped downloads.
As for a recommendation, I’d only recommend a membership to a narrow group: you like the niches they offer, and you only like streaming video. If you’re a photo guy or you prefer to download videos, my recommendation is to avoid the site. It is disappointing to see some unique porn but to have access limited to it by some bad decisions. I definitely won’t be back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Huge network of sites catering to fans of young Eastern European models.
+More than 2800 videos and photosets to choose from.
+You can stream all videos online or you can download them in a variety of format from WMV, FLV and MKV .
+They added High Definition videos in 2011 so you have about 300 or more HD videos.
+Photosets can be downloaded as a complete zip file and resolution is 960x1440.
+All content is dated and they appear to add one new scene every 2 days.
+The members section is well designed and it's easy to find scenes using tag words, site name or the model's name.
+The TBP/PU discount of 19.95$ is amazing.
Cons:
-I find that a large percentage of the content added in the last 4 months is subpar to what TMW used to offer.
-The vast majority of the sites are dead so content is either months old or more likely years old. The only sites that seem to still be adding new content are Teen Sex Movs, Teen Sex Mania, Creampie Angel and Anal Angel.
-They keep adding new sites to the network but this isn't a positive thing because the content on those sites can be quite good so having only a few scenes and then none drives me crazy.
-They have significantly dropped the number of anal scenes since June.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on many other sites.
-They have advertising for other sites on all their pages.
Bottom Line:
*Let me first say that a lot of what I'm about to write amy be negative but only for returning members and not for anyone just joining this network. Anyone just joining this network will more than get his money's worth. If you're a past member and want to join again then please pay attention to the following information prior to doing so. I was last a member in July of this year and even at that time. I was finding that some of the newer content was not all that good. You can imagine my surprise when I joined again last week and found that now almost all the content is like that.
*The first thing you should know is that if you are into anal then you will want to avoid the network for any new anal scenes. I did the math and they only added 19 anal scenes between June and September while they added 38 anal scenes between Feb and May. Those numbers are a lot worse when you consider that they only added 2 anals since July 21. Anal isn't for everybody so hearing that TMW replaced those anal scenes with standard b/g scenes should be great news but many of the scenes that replaced those anal ones tend to often be badly shot, not well lit, and the action is not very hot. also I'm not so sure that the content is as recent as it could be. The most obvious reason for me saying that is that the latest update dated Oct 5 for their anal-angels site is a scene that was released in March of this year on another site. The girl is cute as always but the scene is not well shot and it's frankly not very good.
*I don't know if I'm correct but my gut feeling is that the syphilis outbreak which hit Europe really hard coupled with Russia pretty much banning production of porn in that Country have significantly affected the ability of TMW to offer a higher quality product. I checked and many of the girls that have appeared on TMW are from Russia so that can't be good for business. The economy still being where it is must also be a huge factor and then you still have content thieves. I think TMW had very little already for release and when they started to run out of scenes then they started looking for content providers that had some unreleased material or had decent prices on already relased stuff and that's what you are now seeing.
*I don't know what the futur holds for this network. I hope they turn things around because it was a great network. All I know is that I won't be returing again until I see serious chnages in their content. of course that is going to be hard since their brand new site is just as bad as their old one so no way of knowing what is new on the network.
**My score is based solely on the fact that I'm a returning member who doesn't like their new stuff. Otherwise the score would be in the 90's.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Obviously a very professionally run site. Nothing to complain about the nuts and bolts
Cons:
One man's meat is another man's poison. This is undoubtedly true but all men know a beautiful woman when they see one and they are going to see very few of them on this website. I have never seen so many average-looking females thrown together. Most are plain, many are almost ugly and – what is worse – few are genuinely sexy. The whole set-up is more reminiscent of nudism in the 1960s than modern erotica or porn. It beats me why anyone should want to see these plain janes without their clothes on.
Bottom Line:
The models are neither beautiful nor sexy. Many look so incredibly softcore that it is doubtful that they would know what to do with a penis if they ever came across one.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
No DRM, pre checked cross selling, regional discrimination, or download limits.
Mostly exclusive material, with attractive girls.
Less gynaecological close ups than some other sites.
Not too many tats, or fake breasts, and not too much choking, slapping and abuse of models, that many of us here hate.
High quality spec vids and pics on newer updates, and professionally shot.
Epoch as billing agent.
$24.31 membership available through Amour Babes instead of $34.95.
Cons:
Poor customer service.
Not great membership home pages, with all of them looking the same. Once again, if you want to see what's good to download, the trailer advertising pages that are open to everyone, are far better that the membership home pages.
Only a few sites on the network updating.
Obviously with the majority of sites now defunct, the quality on those sites is below what is expected of modern standard.
Annoying navigation at times.
Irritating advertising links at top of membership pages.
Little build up or stripping in photos.
Another network with very little age, ethnic, or weight, diverstiy. The models are mainly young, white, and slim.
Most of the newer updates now have mp4, but no wmv downloads.
Bottom Line:
First night of membership, most of the sites didn't load so any type of viewing or downloading was impossible. I mailed customer services and unsurprisingly, given their record as documented on here, received no reply. Next day the sites were functioning normally
One download later and I received a message that I had been banned for logging in too many times. I mailed them to say that's because I tried to log in at a number of sites several times to see if any were working. I was told by an automated message to apply to them to reset my password. Unbelievably, it was easy to reset my password as it appeared to be automated. Just as well, as no one seems to be in customer service at 1 Pass For All Sites. They should be renamed No Support For Any Site.
The next day I finally heard from them, saying they had temporary hosting problems, but now everything was fixed.
Even though there are 28 individual sites, they have the same appearance, with a number of the same girls appearing on different sites, only with different outfits, different settings, and different situations. To be fair, that means it isn't any different to most of the other "networks." Names like Tricky Old Teacher, 18 Virgin Sex, Creampied Sweeties, Young Anal Tryouts, Horny In Hospital etc, gives you an idea what to expect from each. The material on updating sites is well produced, with good lighting and photography, and appeals to my taste, as it is slightly less gynaecological than some of the other networks. The girls are attractive, and there are enough of them, and enough decent material, to make the membership worthwhile.
Some of the older sites look untended and uncared for. They often have a photo and name for the girl by the video download, then next to that, on the plot synopsis, have a different name for the girl. Some of the pictures are clearly out of sequence in the set. Either no one has bothered to put them into a correct order, or no one has noticed. It leaves a very bad impression of a site about to go down the plughole, and trying to pick up a few last memberships.They have dated updates, and it seems above board, with no bringing in of old stuff and passing it off for new. If they devoted just a few minutes to tidying things up, it would leave a much better impression.
The newer photos are typical of current porn thinking. Eight or ten all looking the same, then a fast forward to the next batch, without much stripping, teasing, or attempt to set out a chronological sequence of pics. Apperance of the models is young and natural, photographed in a professional way, with little airbrushing or retouching that I could see.
It may be just me being awkward as usual, but the older defunct sites like Wild Young Honeys, and Young Models Casting have better photos as far as being in a chronological and natural order, and looking more like a genuine photo set to those of us older porn consumers. Instead of 8-10 pics all looking the same then fast forward to another bunch all with the same pose, they have more of a continual flow, than most of the modern ones. Unfortunately their specs are below average for modern porn. Why the Tatyana set on Wild Young Honeys should have a yellow/orange hue, is beyond me, but it's a shame because they were only taken six years ago, not eighty.
There is wmv or flv streaming in high or low segments, which stop at the end, and do not automatically move on to the next segment. Slide shows, and full or part downloads are also available. The slide shows disconcertingly move from right to left rather that stay still.
Download speeds are on the slow side of average, but not unacceptable, with an unstated limit of six simultaneous downloads. Picture and video quality is good on the sites that are still updating. Pictures are 1200x800 on the newer updates, 1023x680 and 960x640 on the older ones. Examples of wmv video quality are Tricky Old Teacher and I Fucked Her Finally, 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps, Young Anal Tryouts 1920x1088 at 8447 kbps and 1280x720 at 5030 kbps, Young Models Casting 832x468 at about 2000kbps, down to Wild Young Honeys and Young and Banged 520x416 at about 1450 kbps. However most of the updating sites are starting to use mp4 only, instead of wmv, for their downloading and streaming, so now you have no wmv option.
Despite all the faults I am renewing for another month. The older sites lack modern spec, but have an older porn look that appeals to me. It's a lack of gynaecological closeups, and irritating cameramen and male leads that I find refreshing. The new material is pretty good too.
This network appeals to me, but take a look at the TBP, and other PU reviews, before deciding. For me it's a nice little goldmine. They even have a "new site coming soon."
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The only reason I am writing pros is because PU wants a balanced review. But basically, this site has little or no value. Anyone who subscribes to this site is wasting their time and money.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-DownThemAll manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Some videos can be downloaded as either MPG or WMV files. Some videos only have a WMV option.
Cons:
-Zip file for each photoset downloads with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename the zip to know what photoset you have downloaded.
-Video files download with a generic default filename. So you have to re-write the filename to know what the video is. And since the model is not usually identified, and there is no description of what the action is, you make up your own description if you want to save the file.
-No streaming option to view the video before downloading it. So, you have to download each video and play it, before you can decide if the video is worth viewing or saving.
-But there are only 13 videos at this site, and none of them are worth saving. Or even viewing.
-Only have one option for the videos and photosets for definition. No high, medium or low choices.
-The photosets and videos are very low definition.
-This is an archive site. No updates in years.
-Tiny site. 13 videos. 55 photosets.
-Navigation is primitive.
-No search.
Bottom Line:
CONS(continued):
-No posting date for videos or photosets.
-No model bio data.
-No models are named in any of the photosets.
-A few models are named in a few of the videos. But most of the models in the videos are not named.
-The video files are very low definition.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 13
Video size: 320x240 352x240 720x480
Total bitrate: 712 kbps 1628kbps
Different video files will have their own specifications. You don't get a choice of specifications. Most of the videos have the low 320x240 size. A few have 720x480, but even then, the video is poor, maybe from lack of focus or other factors.
Number of photosets: 55
Photo dimensions: 768x1152p or 1024x683p
Number of photos per set: 33 to 141
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. The content was made years ago.
You get better looking photos at archive sites like My Precious Vigins and Teen Stars Magazines, as well as better looking models at those other sites.
If you like this style of photography, Amour Angels is a site that is still updating, and has superior photography and more attractive models, as well as superior site design.
There are some cute models at this site, and their photosets are OK. Not great, but OK. And if you're already a member, it's pobably worth saving some of their sets for completeness.
The videos are worthless, because of the low definition. Even if some of the models are cute, the picture is so poor no PU member would waste his time watching these videos.
Bottom line:
Because of the small amount of content, the poor quality of the content, poor site design, most PU members would give this site a miss.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Content is dated. The video dates range from November 2006 thru November 2008. The photosets are from 2007 and 2008.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can download the videos.
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-DownThemAll file manager works at this site.
Cons:
-Primitive site layout.
-No search.
-Archive site. No updates.
-Videos are from years ago. The definition is very low.
-Videos download with the default filename of full.avi or full.wmv. So you have to re-name each download, or else the succeeding videos will either over-write the previous video, or it won't download. Also need to rewrite the filename so
you know what the video is about.
-No model bios.
-Models not named in the videos or photosets.
-No streaming option for videos. Have to download the file to watch.
-Only one definition for each video.
-Only one definition for each photoset.
-You have a thumbnail illustrating each photoset and video. But the thumbnail is so small, and such poor quality, you don't really know what the model looks like.
Bottom Line:
Videos:
Number of videos: 106
Width by height: 360x240 or 288x216
Total bitrate: 1340 kbps or 216 kbps
Runtime: 8 to 23 minutes
Photosets:
Number of photosets: 532
Number of photos per photoset: 70 to 170
Photo: 370x560 pixels or 600x336 pixels or 768x1024 pixels
This is a hardcore teen site.
Because of the low definition of the videos, they are only useful as a reminder of the early days of internet porn. No one who has access to most internet porn sites today would want to watch, or be satisfied with, the low-definition videos available at this site.
I didn't save a single video from this site. The girls might be attractive, but they are so blurry, and the videos are so low-definition, it's just a waste of time looking at them.
The photosets are like screenshots. The photoset is usually like a video-capture of a video shoot. So there is no posing for best effect, no artistic or sensual value to the photos. The colors are poor.
The truth is, I've been spoiled by the good and fine and excellent quality of the videos and photosets at today's porn sites. Looking at the content of this site makes me realize how far we've come in a few short years. This site might
have some curiosity value. But comparing the contents to what is available at other sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Zip files for photosets.
-Can download videos as AVI or WMV files.
-Can download a video as a single file, or download segments of the video.
-Can use a download manager. I used DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got about 1.3MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
Cons:
-Content not dated.
-The zip file for a single photoset offers only one size definiton. There is no low, medium, high quality choices.
-The models in the photosets are not named.
-You only get a single, low-definition choice for the videos. No medium or high definition option. And the low-definition is really poor, 400x300.
-The photosets download with the default filename of "gallery.zip". So you have to rename each download, or the following zip files either won't
download, or will over-write the previous "gallery.zip" file.
-The captcha on login is hard to read.
-No search function.
-Navigation is basic.
-I found no videos worth keeping.
-The photos are better quality than the videos, but I found no photos worth keeping.
-No streaming. Have to download a video to watch it.
-No model index.
-No model bios.
-Some WMV video files can't be played, because neither Windows Media Player or VLC Player could recognize the file's input.
Bottom Line:
Site specs:
Number of videos: 38
Average runtime of video: from 10 to 40 minutes.
Videos can be downloaded in AVI and WMV format.
AVI files:
400x300 width x height.
1,213 kbps total bitrate
WMV files:
400x300 width x height.
1,214 kbps total bitrate
Number of photosets: 219
Average number of photos per set: from 25 to 40.
Photo dimensions: 768x1024 pixels.
The number of photosets seems large. Certainly far larger than the 38 videos. But the reason for the large number of photosets is that photos of
a single video shoot are often separated into a number of photosets, so that the site contents appear larger. A single photoset is small, usually between 20 and 40 photos.
This is a hardcore teen site.
This is an archive site. Even though the content is not dated, I believe the content was shot years ago.
The video quality is poor. There are many reasons for the poor video quality. The main factor is the low definition of the videos. You only get
one definition in the video, and this is such a low definition that you see lines in the video on playback. This is such a low-definition video
that it's lower than the lowest definition offered at major sites like Teen Mega World or Nubiles. The colors in the videos are poor. The
costumes the models wear are cheap. The sets are cheap.
The models can be good looking, and they can put on a good show sexually. But they are wasted in these low-quality videos.
The photos are better quality than the videos. The video quality is just awful. The photos are decently photographed softcore and hardcore. Not
artistic, or sensual, but ok shots of hardcore action. The photos are low-definition, very little production values, but still better than the god-awful videos.
This site's contents might have had some value maybe 10 years ago. But compared to what is being offered today at other teen sites, this site is a waste of time and money.
Truthfully, you will find better quality videos at free tube sites than what you can find at this site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most photosets have zips for high, medium, and low res.
-Can search by name of model, by tag (such as blowjobs), etc.
-Each photoset and videos is illustrated with a nice-sized thumbnail of a scene from the shoot, which gives a view of the model. The thumbnails
could be higher quality, but it gives you a basic idea of what the model looks like.
-Content is dated, by when the content was posted to the site.
-Most video shoots have a matching photoshoot. This is good and bad. It increases the content for each girl. But the photoshoots are basically a photo capture of the video shoot. And the photoshoot could easily be improved by using professional makeup on the model, as well as having a professional photographer taking the pictures, so the photos would be better posed, better framed, be more erotic or attractive.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Videos can be downloaded as AVI or WMV files.
Cons:
PROS(CONTINUED):
-DownThemAll download manager works.
-Good download speeds. I regularly got 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
CONS:
-Video files download with the file name "full.avi" or "full.wmv". So you have to rename each file, or succeeding files won't download into the same folder destination. Also have to re-name the file so you know who the model is, and what the video shows.
-Most photosets are a photo shoot of the corresponding video shoot. So the model is not posed to her best advantage. The model's make-up is not professionally applied. The photos are better than screen caps, but not by much. The photos are not high quality or professionally shot.
-You have some very attractive or cute or lovely models, but the photosets do not take advantage of the model's attractiveness. A wasted opportunity.
-The number of sets per model is completely random.
-Captcha is a little tricky. Could be easier to read.
Bottom Line:
CONS(CONTINUED):
-Site navigation is primitive. Makes you wish for sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel network, or any other site that is well-designed and easy to use.
-Quality of vids and photosets varies from poor to just OK. Makes you wish for high quality sites, or even just good quality.
-Occasionally some links don't work. You click on a link to stream a model's video, and you get a more-or-less blank page instead of the streaming video.
-Update rate: Slow. One video and one photoset per week.
-Even though streaming a video is easier than downloading the file, the stream degrades the picture slightly. So you are better off downloading the video and playing the file, for better quality viewing. But video quality at Teen Mega World is better. And the video quality at Diesel network and sites like X-Art is even more superior.
BOTTOM LINE:
Site stats:
Number of videos: 210
Runtime: averages about 21 minutes.
Videos can be streamed or dowloaded.
Download as WMV(1280x720) or AVI(1280x720) files.
The file specs are for the more recent files.
Number of photosets: 217
Number of photos per set: about 120 - 160 photos.
Zip files for high, medium, and low resolution.
The difference in resolution between the high and medium and small is large:
High resolution photo: 5616x3744 pixels
Medium resolution photo: 1666x2500 pixels
Small resolution photo: 682x1024 pixels
On the high resolution photo size, you have each photo taking up 6 MB or more, with attractive models, and the photos are a waste of space: the
models don't appear attractive, the shots are not professionally framed, the film colors are not vibrant, etc.
On the small resolution photo size, each photo takes up 200 KB or more space, which until a few years ago would have meant a high resolution
photo. And the photos are just a waste of space: poorly photographed photos, with no production values. Shot by an amateur who has no feel or
artistic talent. You are shooting lovely girls, and ruining the opportunity, because the photos have no value.
Number of models: 177
There are a large number of Eastern European teens, many of which are featured at other porn sites like Teen Mega World, Diesel, Nubiles. The
same models are presented more attractively at the other sites: Better photography, better videos, better makeup, better costumes.
Even the recent content looks like it was shot by an amateur. A really home-made feel, and that is not a compliment.
Navigation is primitive, making it hard and time-consuming to search the site.
Bottom line: In spite of many attractive teen models, this is a poor choice.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Cams
Many Girls available
speaking English
Euro teens
non Pros , mostly Amateur Girls (Girl from the neighbourhood) Teen Girls
Cons:
recognized the site first time in 2002.
i got a member there in 2007 first time.
Before, after u pay to renter the site (something under 20 €)u got a lot in free chat, many girls online doing shows, u didnt need to pay more. 24 hours a day.Just the cam quality was a bit poor.
In 2008, they changed the layout of the site, also they changed that girls just talk in freechat, for more you need to pay more now in private rooms.
So if you want to join the site in his sense, it will be an expensive matter.
Also a lot of good, sexy long-established girls left the site, and the new girls doesnt have the qualitiy in their shows.
that change is a reason for me, not to join this site anymore.
If they will go back to the style it was before 2008, i immediatley would go back there.
Bottom Line:
Clubseventeen (Seventeenlive)is worship, but in that
hustler style, thi site is not worth it to register at.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Cams
Many Girls available
speaking English
Euro teens
non Pros , mostly Amateur Girls (Girl from the neighbourhood) Teen Girls
Cons:
I recognized the site first time in 2002.
i got a member there in 2007 first time.
Before, after u pay to renter the site (something under 20 €)u got a lot in free chat, many girls online doing shows, u didnt need to pay more. 24 hours a day.Just the cam quality was a bit poor.
In 2008, they changed the layout of the site, also they changed that girls just talk in freechat, for more you need to pay more now in private rooms.
So if you want to join the site in his sense, it will be an expensive matter.
Also a lot of good, sexy long-established girls left the site, and the new girls doesnt have the qualitiy in their shows.
that change is a reason for me, not to join this site anymore.
If they will go back to the style it was before 2008, i immediatley would go back there.
Bottom Line:
Clubseventeen (Seventeenlive)is worship, but in that
hustler style, thi site is not worth it to register at.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful.
Bottom Line:
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A huge site with an archive going back 10 years featuring 792 models in 9900+ photo sets (almost 1.2 million images) and 2300+ videos.
A huge array of outfits, costumes, lingerie, leg and footwear.
Exclusive content
Bonus sites Only Carla and Only Melanie included.
Photos in choice of 3 sizes, 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048 and 2000 x 3000px
Zip download for each size.
Video download options are HD 1280 x 720 and High Res 640 x 360 wmv, HD and High Res streaming options plus an m4v download for ipod.
At least 3 updates every day of the week, some days can be up to 6.
All content date stamped right back to 2002.
All file sizes shown and video run times.
No apparent download limits.
Customizable browse options and excellent search engine.
10 free Fast Track credits provided allowing you to view forthcoming releases of your choice before they are officially released.
Choice of Epoch or CCBill for credit card payments.
Cons:
The site is very softcore, any nudity is fairly tame and many models don’t go any further than just topless, some not even that far.
Some repetition of outfits and shoot locations.
Oldest videos poor quality.
Videos quite short averaging 5-6 minutes.
If you prefer your HD videos in a format other than wmv you will be disappointed.
The most irritating thing for me were the zip downloads of the older photo sets (released up until about 2008 I think), after downloading and extracting the zips you have to click your way through 7-8 folders before arriving at the photos, really annoying.
Poor file naming, seemingly random meaningless numbers and letters so renaming required.
Ads in member’s area
Minimum 4 months subscription required to access “VIP member’s area”
Regional pricing with both CCBill and Epoch.
Bottom Line:
For anyone considering a membership at Only Tease the main thing to consider is that it is a very softcore site containing very little explicit nudity. The site is all about the clothing, costumes, lingerie and hosiery being worn by the models, teasing and tantalising you with that flash of stocking top or suspender belt, catching a glimpse of their panties up their short skirts or a view of their cleavage down that tight blouse before she slowly removes the items of clothing one by one. You will find almost every type of outfit you could possibly think of from casual wear to business suits, glamorous evening gowns to clubbing wear, various uniforms like college girl, cheerleader, nurse, French maid to sports outfits and even some fictional characters such as Snow White and Alice in wonderland.
Amongst the near 800 models you will find some well known US and Euro models but what I really liked was the amazing collection of British models. Despite being from the UK I don’t buy magazines or patronise the sleazy tabloid press so most of these page three models were completely unknown to me. I was planning to just stick around for 1 month and try to be selective about what I downloaded but there are so many gorgeous models I found it almost impossible to deny most of them space on my hard drive so as a result I’m already well in to my 2nd month. Some of the more popular models have a huge amount of content, in some cases well over a hundred updates, almost like having several solo sites within the site. I loved the collection of Hayley-Marie here with a whopping 171 updates. Bryoni-Kate was another favourite of mine with 90 updates.
With such a huge amount of content you need to be able to navigate around it easily and they do provide plenty of browse and search tools. You can browse either photos or videos by a month and year listing or use the A-Z model index. They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search for any type of outfit with several filters to refine your search. For example a basic search for “miniskirt” will bring up over 4000 results and you can then narrow your search by adding various filters such as the type and colour of stockings, tights or socks you want to go with it and also the type of lingerie required and then add in some model criteria like hair colour and breast size and whether you require nudity or just topless.
In addition they also have several features in the browse options like “behind the scenes”, “model of the year” and “model of the month”. There’s also a “prestige tease” section where you will find some of the top name models in slightly more glam and photo shopped galleries than the regular OT galleries although they’ve not updated that section since May of this year. There’s also a feature called “Tease at Home” which allegedly features the model being shot in her own home and being allowed to choose her own outfits. You also have the ability to rate the models, outfits and tease factor of every shoot and they have “Top lists” showing the highest rated in each category. Other extras include Wallpapers and there’s a very active forum where members can discuss models and outfits.
I’m not particularly interested in the videos, I did however find the videos here slightly more interesting than those on their sister site Art-Lingerie that I reviewed recently mainly because the videos here start fully clothed so you at least have a bit of anticipation and build up with some teasing and a striptease. They did however suffer from the same flaws IMO, having that awkward silence again with no back ground music and rarely any chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start. I just find it really irritating and amateurish when you can hear every little background noise. Some models do have separate interview videos where they talk about themselves…yawn….boring.
In addition to the regular daily updates, every Tuesday and Thursday they add an additional update which is designated as a “VIP Members” update. Clicking on these tells me I am not eligible to view them until the 1st day of my 4th month of membership so clearly these extra updates are designed to try and incentivize members to stick around longer and spend more money. The VIP updates look to have started around September 2011 so you’d be looking at around an extra 90 updates if you stick around long enough. I’m not sure these extra updates are enough incentive for me to stick around, after nearly 2 months of softcore teasing I’m ready to move on for some naked pussy. A highly recommended site though if you love softcore stripping, teasing, stockings and lingerie as I do.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
There are no DRM, download limits, regional discrimination, pre checked cross sells, or dirty tricks.
Beautiful girls.
Some very orginal and erotic poses.
Good lighting and overall sense of professionalism.
Good quality videos.
Zipped photos.
Easy log in.
Still updating.
Cons:
Same style and angles every time resulting in a mass produced look.
The picture sets contain too many of the same pose and have little continuity.
Very little ethnic, age, or shape diversity. Models are mainly thin, white, and young.
Few picture or download options. Top quality video is now mp4, not wmv. You have to drop lower in quality to obtain wmv.
Navigation not the best.
No teasing or build up in the pics or videos.
Occasionally annoying male leads.
Although you get some bonus sites, it is a relatively small network.
Bottom Line:
Video Downloads - Best Quality 1280x720 at 4000kbps (4838), High Quality 800x452 at 2500 kbps, Normal Quality 580x328 at 1000 kbps. Recently, for some reason, they changed their "Best Quality" downloads from wmv to mp4. The 4000 kbps wmv is now unavailable, and has been changed to 4500 kbps mp4, so if you want wmv, you have to download a lower quality video.
Pics, and sometimes videos, are ridiculously frustrating because although they choose some original and erotic angles to shoot from, they continually miss out the lower legs and feet, and concentrate far too much on the groin, ass, and upper thigh, turning the models into amputees. I have seen criticism elsewhere on PU, concerning the gynaecological focus of their shoots. A great shame because the models are fantastic, and they think up some original angles to shoot from, then they undermine this eroticism by turning the models into amputees 80 per cent of the time. It is particularly annoying in the pics, where it would appear, feet do not exist.
Although they have great and original angles and ways of shooting models, that mould is set, and they rarely stray from doing exactly the same thing on each shoot, making everything look mass produced.
The pics are adequate but a lot of the time there is little continuity or thought put into the sets. You see a girl starting with clothes, but you don't see much of the strip or lead up to sex. It is like watching six frames from a video, forward winding for four minutes, then watching another six frames, then forward winding, and so on. There are four to eight almost identical pictures of a model in one pose, then four to eight in another pose, with little idea of continuity or progression in the shoot.
Sometimes the male leads can be very irritating. Whether this is by direction or not I don't know. Some continually slap the asses of the models, grunt, groan, and paw their female co workers like they were terrorists abusing their hostages. That can be unerotic for some of us.
Okay, let's be honest, let's come out of the closet. Female genitalia just by itself isn't all that attractive, neither is chopped liver, or any type of roadkill. It is what leads up to that genitalia that is attractive. The whole package, the eyes, the face, the breasts, the legs, the everything. It's the genitalia in context, along with the whole package. I so wish some of these sites would realise that. We've got past the shock of penetration about 40 years ago in Europe, 30 years ago in America, amd 10 years ago in Britain. So we don't need closeups of two thrusting groins and nothing else. We know they're having sex, we get to see it all the time.
I know sites have to keep production costs as cheap as possible, but surely it's possible to see two whole people having sex, and give us some idea of the beauty of the whole girl. It's done professionally, but with little love for the subject. This is true of 99% of porn, both today and in the past so I can't complain too much.
Their visitors preview site probably gives a better preview of what's on offer than the members' home page as there you get a better idea of how the girls look, and what the sets are like.
It may just me being stupid again but once I got into browsing a picture set, I couldn't get back to home again without going through my favourites option.
There is a model search option from the home page (in very small print), but when you access the model using this, the video and picture download options are dead links. You therefore have to look at the date, then go back to the home pages and work out where the model is on the chronologically listed update pages in order to download pics and videos.
It seems there is a six simultaneous downloads limit.
Logging in is easy, and you can return to the site without re entering your password.
The lighting, production and photography are mainly very good. If you go back to the first few girls recorded in 2009 you can see how much this has improved. The early ones look very different, with a different style, angles, and lighting.
You would think by the title of "First Anal Quest" its close relative "Double View Casting," and the comments "real teenagers craving to get their cherries popped," and "no fake scenes no bullshit," these are mostly first timers, but not a bit of it. Some of these girls (for example Britney, Stonell, and Kristina) have been around for a long long time, and have appeared on many other sites featuring Eastern European Girls. Some of these girls have pussies more pounded than when a juggernaut lorry crashed into the local Pets At Home.
All in all it is worth a visit, but very few seasoned downloaders will find any need to stay more than a month, or maybe two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The same great fresh teen girls that we all know and love from other TeenCoreClub sites but now in 1080P full HD!!!
+ Young newbies, hard anal sex. For me that's a winning combination
+ Great professionally shot video with super vibrant colors at WMV 1920x1080 @ ~7Mbps
+ All videos come with a matching photo set containing on average 450 pictures at 1280x853.
+ Good download speeds, using a download manager with 4 channels mean I can download videos at ~25mbps
+ Videos can be downloaded as clips in high or low quality or as a full scene in high quality.
+ No DRM
+ No regional pricing
Cons:
- Only 11 scenes
- Dont be surprised if the combined number of updates across all sites included in the membership is only a 1-2 per month
- Full scenes can only be downloaded in full HD which means a 1.5GB download. Not ideal for those on slow connections or those who dont care about HD
- Very, very basic interface. No model list, no search, no streaming. Just page after page of videos.
- No network interface, you have to log into each site individually
- Updates are not dated
- No zip file download option for pictures
Bottom Line:
Although this site launched around 4 months ago I put my soft spot for Teen Core Club aside as the last time I jumped on a new site (Defiled18.com) I was stung by the lack of updates. So I waited until now to join and guess what? I have been stung by the lack of updates.
Pat's great review is almost 2 months old and he states there were 10 videos available, which I think is the number the site launched with. The number of updates today? 11. Thats right, they have done it again, launched a new and interesting site and completely destroyed any chance of keeping long term members by failing to support it. A site that receives one update over a 4 month period is a disgrace. Defiled18.com did the same, launched with 10 episodes just over a year ago and today have only 16. Going by those numbers, on these new sites we get 1 update every 2 months.
While a membership here also gives access to TryTeens.com, WhiteTeensBlackCocks.com and Defiled18.com, which are the only TeenCoreClub sites that still update, they make it so difficult to get at whats new due to the fact you have to log in to each site individually. I really don't understand why they want to make it so obtuse for a paying customer to get their stuff.
Bottom line, my patience for this lot is almost at its end. I think I will have to go over to Teen Mega World for my Russian newbe fix or maybe even try out the newly resurected No Rest Network. When the owners of the site dont seem to give a crap about the quality of their product I dont think I should be supporting them anymore.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
*1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons:
* Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line:
I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.
Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.
The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.
You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.
The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:
"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]
I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.
The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.
I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.
The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.
I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!
All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.
Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.
- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.
- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).
- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.
- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below.
Cons:
- There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).
- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.
- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.
- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc.
Bottom Line:
The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.
If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.
So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.
So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.
There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
