Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Note: This site consists of some exclusive content as well as some leased content that can be found on other Russian-based porn sites. I will address the exclusive scenes as well as the leased scenes.
-The scenes that are exclusive to this site feature good camera work. Nice zoomed-out camera angles, not too many closeups.
Cons:
-the lighting in some scenes is amateurish, sometimes "dim".
-There is a large amount of leased content that can be found on other sites (if you know Russian porn, you'll recognize a lot of these scenes are from what I call the "Timo Hardy crew"...I call this production group the "Timo Hardy crew" because many of their scenes feature the male actor Timo Hardy. Their scenes all have a very similar look and similar camera work. You'll instantly recognize the look of these scenes if you're familiar with Russian porn. This production group seems to lease out their content to most of the Russian porn sites out there).
-all the scenes on this network are only 25 fps (frames per second). I know some European sites use the 25 fps format, but in this day and age it's about time everyone jumped to 29 fps.
-I wish the "medium" quality downloadable videos were a bit bigger and had higher bit rates. however, the high quality downloadable videos are good, if a bit large (1 to 1.5 gigabytes).
Bottom Line:
Like I said above, this site consists of some exclusive content as well as some leased content that can be found on other Russian-based porn sites, so it's a bit of mixed bag. Teens Analyzed seems to be a collection of all the the anal scenes from this network. It seems that recently this network has taken all of the scenes from it's other anal sites (First Anal Date, and Bang My Teen Ass) and combined them all here to form one large anal site. Once you are a member, when you sign in to First Anal Date, or Bang My Teen Ass, it goes to a page that says all of the scenes have been moved to Teens Analyzed. Since this is the case, they should probably just shut down First Anal Date and Bang My Teen Ass.
There are 3 types of scenes found on this site:
1. There are the leased scenes from the "Timo Hardy crew" which have the typical look that you see in most Russian porn...annoying camera work with way too many closeups. I would guess that many of these scenes can be found on other Russian porn sites like Hardcore Youth, teen mega world, etc. The drawback is that here the scenes are only offered at 25 fps.
2. Then there is another group of scenes from the other site on this network, bangmyteenass.com. These scenes appear to be leased and I found a lot of them available on another network. These scenes feature good camera work and were definitely worth downloading. Great zoomed-out camera angles show of the girls bodies, no time-wasting closeups that plague the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes. Very good stuff.
3. Then there is the exclusive content, which is mostly from the other site on this network, firstanaldate.com. These scenes have their own look and have very good camera work. They have nice zoomed-out camera angles and don't use too many closeups. These exclusive scenes have a bit of an amateurish look, with more amateurish lighting where they often use the light from the camera itself since the room is usually not lit well enough on its own. But overall the quality on these scenes is great and the good camera angles more than make up for the amateurish lighting.
I joined this site for content found in categories 2 and 3 above, since the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes could probably be found elsewhere and with a better frame rate than they are on here. I found some scenes on this site that I already had from other sites, but on this site the scene was dropped to 25 fps, while the version I had from another site was 29 fps. So, if you're joining this site, I would probably avoid the "Timo Hardy crew" scenes, since they are only 25 fps here.
The sex is slower and more sensual which I like (not too much hardcore pounding that plagues many porn sites). There are some very cute girls here that are more rare and aren't as common on the other major Russian porn sites.
Overall Teens Analyzed is a very good Russian anal site. In the end, I found close to 100 scenes here from categories 2 and 3 above. If you are into Russian porn and are looking for some new scenes, I would check this site out. As someone who doesn't like the camera angles used in most Russian porn sites, the zoomed-out camera angles found in some of these scenes were much appreciated. If you are picky about camera angles like me, and you are annoyed by porn that focuses too much on extreme closeups, then there are some great scenes for you here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Many attractive models
-Decent sized site overall
-Navigation is good
-Good variety of softcore, lesbian, hardcore
-Camerawork is generally good
-Zips of photosets, newer ones in 3 quality levels
-Newer videos are of respectable quality, typically 4 options available (SD wmv, HD mp4, SD mp4, and portable), I generally downloaded SD mp4
-No DRM, download managers work, respectable biller
-Most girls are natural
-Frequent updates, generally a photo and video set every day
Cons:
-Sort of expensive
-No network access, no bonus sites
-Older videos and photos are substandard quality and older movies are often split in parts
-Not a lot of diversity in model body type or ethnicity
-HD scenes seem larger file-size wise than they have to be
-A fair amount (maybe 1/5 or so) of the video material is "behind the scenes" type of stuff, I don't mind it, but could be a negative for some
-Some material is not exclusive
Bottom Line:
Generally I think this site is pretty good, but not great. I sort of don't get the whole setup of all the ATK sites, what makes this one premium, is this site exclusively the hot girls? In general, I guess this is the case compared to some of their other sites as the hot/wtf ratio seems to be a good bit higher.
I liked the material here for the most part, but for some reason felt a bit disappointed here. Can't really put my finger on why. Most sites I join, I spend a fair amount more time poking around and checking things out, but I got tired of this one pretty fast for some reason. That isn't to say that they don't have some good material here, they certainly do, I just wasn't super-excited by it I guess.
As for the site itself, the navigation is pretty good: model index, scene ratings, scene tags, it is pretty easy to get around. The girls are generally of the thinner more natural body types, and they have both American and Euro stars.
Overall, I think I would recommend joining this site to those that never had before, but I don't know that I would recommend it as a repeat join even given the update schedule. They seem to do most things very well, and the models are generally quite attractive, so it is certainly worth a look.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The bulk of the content is exclusif.
+They have 209 scenes and they add one new scene each week.
+These guys still manage to get the first anal from some really hot Eastern European girls.
+The scenes are well lit, well shot and offer a variety of angles in which to see the action.
+Videos can be downloaded in 3 versions from 580x328 1000kbps, 800x450 2500kbps and 1280x720 4000kbps.
+They offer photosets of all the scenes and these can be downloaded as a single zip file. The resolution varies from 680x1024 up to 1280x854.
+You get access to 4 other sites.
Cons:
-The only bonus site with any kind of decent content is double view casting but the content and performers are almsot all the same as FAQ so you aren't really getting anything different.
-The other bonus sites have very little content and most of it was not of any interest to me.
-Some of the older content doesn't appears to be exclusif.
Bottom Line:
*This is a site that I keep joining because they are one of the few Eastern European site that doesn't seem to have any problem finding new girls willing to do anal. It also doesn't hurt that they shoot some really great scenes and tend to avoid doing circus acts. Now that's not to say that verything is perfect because sometimes there is very little heat between the players but I find that those are on the rare side.
*This site's name tells you everything you need to know about the content so if you want to see young hot Eastern European women have anal sex than you have to join this site. You can visit the bonus sites but I don't know if you will download a lot of the content on these sites. I know that I only downloaded a couple.
**The bonus sites are:
Double View casting: This is basically the same type of anal themed porn as FAQ except that you can download a special viewer which then allows you to view the action from two different angle. The downside is that you have to also download the two version of the same scene to be able to do that and that will eat up a lot of Gig space rather quickly. There are 83 scenes which are dated and they update with about 1-2 new scenes per month.
Jizz on teens: This is basically a two girl on one guy oral sex themed site. Content is not dated but based on the performer for some of the more recent stuff then they are still updating. I' just can't say how often and what the amount is. There are only 24 scenes.
Fuck N Drive: This is basically a site where the girls have sex near, on or inside somekind of vehicle. There are 35 scenes on the site and they were updating wih one new scene about once a month but the last update was in January.
Wanted GFS: This appears to be a mostly photoset only site where the content is largely softcore with some mild midcore as well. I didn't recognize all the girls but some are professional performers. Content is not dated so no way of knowing if and when they update. There are over 210 sets at the moment.
**I increased my score vs my last review by two because these guys have managed to stay on track with their update and they have also managed to introduce so many new girls to us.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Good quality photography
* Most girls are attractive and display a good attitude
* Good connection speed
* Navigation will mostly be familiar to users of other sites on Met-Art's network.
Cons:
* Streaming videos seem buggy if you want to do anything other than watch them from beginning to end without pauses or skips.
* Lots of strange insertions and weird borderline-BDSM pussy play (may be a pro to some)
* Very little, and mostly mediocre, boy/girl content
* Some videos are basically just the photo sets with a camcorder running (can hear posing instructions etc)
* Navigation options are very lacking and search often turns up irrelevant results. Has a tag system but searches seem to mostly ignore it.
* Model names aren't consistent with other sites, even other sites on the same network.
Bottom Line:
This is a site whose name I've been seeing for a LONG time. If it's not older than some of the girls in its newest sets, I'm pretty sure it's close - I'm fairly sure it debuted in the 90s, though it only specifically shows shoots back to 2005 at the moment, with selected older content relegated to an undated "archives" section.
I've liked a lot of the bits of content I've seen from them over the years, but never felt compelled to join until now. It seems to have recently been taken over by Met-Art. Like many other sites in their orbit of late, they're marketing it pretty aggressively, with a good discount available through PornUsers and an even better one having recently been e-mailed to current and former members of other sites in this network. On the basis of this, I signed up. Unfortunately I have just canceled after only four days (as always, the membership will still run for a total of a month, it just won't renew).
Partly this is because I mostly want boy/girl content and ALS has only recently started (or resumed - I could have sworn they had some in their early days?) shooting such content. I'd say well under a quarter of their recent updates (which occur once a day) have featured straight sex, and this content only dates back a few months.
However, it's hard to say for sure because there is no option to zero in on a particular type of content, other than a search box that seems to mostly pay attention to the (rather arbitrary) set titles. You'll look in vain for a list of categories on which you can click "boy/girl" and get a list of all the b/g content. Search for "boy/girl" and you'll get every set with "girl" in the title, which as you can imagine, is a LOT of them. This needs a rethink.
Once you've found what you're looking for, it's usually... good but not great. Nearly everything about this site is good but not great, actually (except the navigation which is downright bad). The looks of the models are good but not great, the creativity of the sets and shot choices is good but not great, technical aspects like connection speed are good but not great. Unfortunately with the number of sites competing for my dollar, "good but not great" isn't going to cut it. I certainly don't regret signing up, especially at the price they were offering as of a few days ago, but I don't see anything that compels me to renew.
As with network-mate Sexart (for which I would now want to revise my glowing review downwards a little), it seems to promise something amazing and groundbreaking but deliver something that's merely above-average.
Overall, I can honestly say this is a site I'd recommend, but only weakly so. It's definitely worth it at the very low prices on offer in various places lately. You might like it better than I did if you prefer solo or girl-girl action or if you're into things like a cute girl clipping a dream-catcher to her labia. (That kind of weird borderline-BDSM stuff is only in a minority of their sets, but it's conspicuous by the mere fact that it's there at all.) I can't say that's my thing; while I appreciate a more creative approach to porn, that isn't the direction in which I'd prefer to look for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Apparently one username and password will work to gain entry to all the bonus sites I am supposed to have access to.
-Get access to 21 bonus sites with membership.
-Download manager works. I use Down Them All, which is very helpful at this site.
-Homepage has a link to "YOUNG TIGHT PUSSY new for your ultimate pleasure", which opens an ad for fleshlight, which has differently named models of the fleshlight, also different color options, which is really more than I wanted to know.
Cons:
-You are assigned a random-generated username and password for site login.
-Primitive site design.
-Download speeds can vary from less thant 200 KB/sec to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-You have to be patient with their hot links. They often don't work on the first or second click.
-Download manager is really helpful. If a video file stops downloading, you can resume the download with the download manager. Several files stopped downoading in mid-download, and I was able to resume the download in each case.
-Video files download with the default filename of "download.zip". So you have to rename the files to keep them separate.
-Site contents have no posting date.
-No search function. If you want to find the videos with a model, have to manually search through the entire videos and hope her name is listed on the tiny thumbnail that represents the video listing.
-No streaming offered. If you want to examine a video, have to download the video, and then play it.
Bottom Line:
This is not a tiny site. There are over 300 videos at this site. The theme of the site is young teens doing nasty things with sex.
The poor site structure makes navigation difficult. No search function, no model listing with thumbnails to show what the models look like, no model bios. They opened this site, and dumped a bunch of videos into it. And that's a shame. Because many of the models are cute or attractive. Many of the videos are nicely shot.
Videos are grouped into two categories:
Softcore movies, and hardcore movies.
Their definition of softcore includes lesbian sex, blowjob, masturbation.
Their definition of hardcore includes boy-girl fucking. Blowjob can be found in both the softcore and hardcore movie categories.
The videos are better than I thought they would be.
Sample data rates:
The frame width x height is: 1024x576.
Total bitrate: 2548kbps
Frame width x height is: 632x512
Total bitrate: 1181 kbps
The videos are professionally shot: good color, good focus, good lighting, nicely framed shots.
They also have some very attractive models at this site.
It's a shame they have some nice videos of attractive models that they just dumped the videos into a site without making much effort to making the site easier to use. Because of the unsorted, jumbled videos, most people would not realize that some of the videos are really excellent.
I'm giving the site a score of 75 because some of these videos are worth viewing and saving. That's in spite of the site problems which I've detailed: no search function, no streaming, no model iist with thumbnails to show what the models look like, hot links that barely work to download the videos.
I certainly can't recommend the site. Except that if you stumbled across some of the videos that I thought were really nice, maybe you would think the site might be worth joining, after all.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Good download speeds. I get 1 to 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Down Them All download manager works at this site.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Site uses Epoch.com as the billing agent, a nationally recognized bill agent.
-The content is dated when posted to the site.
Cons:
-Site needs a complete makeover to make it easier to use.
-Search function is poor. You enter the name of a model, and it turns out that the model is not even in the videos or photosets that are returned from the search. So either different models are given the same name, or the search function is crap. Either way, if you want to search for videos that a model appears in, it seems like you will have to manually search through all the videos at this site, which is a complete waste of time.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like.
-Lots of advertising for other sites on members pages.
-There is an amateur feel to the videos. They seem to shot by an amateur videographer who has an amateur camera: the focus could be better, the shots could be better framed, the lighting is ok but not professional, the colors are not super-crisp, the sets/background is cheap furniture inside a house or apartment.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Videos download with a poor default filename such as "high.MP4, so you have to rename them to tell them apart.
-The site structure is poor. To go through the videos, you have to click on a number to go to a page that lists 5 videos, then click on the higher number go to the next page. But you get duplicates of videos that were found on earlier pages. A video that appears on page 3 might also appear on page 4. So it's not easy to navigate the site, and the duplicate listings make it harder.
-No simple lising of site models, with a nice thumbnail to identify what they look like. Trying to identify who the models are in the videos is a waste of time. Unless you recognize a model in a video from some other site, you don't know who the models are in a video, because the names the site lists (for who appears in a video) are useless.
-Videos have subtitles to translate the Russian the models speak. But the video download files do not have the subtitles. Not a big deal, because the subtitles are mainly boring. The sex action is what counts.
BOTTOM LINE:
Sorry for the poor language, but these site/network really needs a makeover to make the site contents easier to use.
When you compare Teen Mega World or Diesel Access networks or X-Art or other high grade sites to this site, you begin to realize how much thought was put into making the other sites/networks easier to use. At Young Sex Parties, there is little to no thought to making the site user-friendly. They opened a site, dumped cheap amateur-style, home made videos into the site, and let the members sort through the mess without any helpful model list, without any effort to name the models on a consistent basis, without bothering to add a listing of the models in the videos.
Choice of file types for download:
FLV For Windows,
MP4 For Windows, Mac, iPad, iPhone4
MP4 For iPhone3/iPod
MP4 For Sony PSP
3GP For mobile phones
Number of site videos:
The Best Porn (the parent of the PU site) lists the number of site videos at 117.
I believe The Best Porn site reviewer just took the number of videos from the site facts, instead of counting the videos themselves.
You have a sort-of-listing of the videos pages, 24 pages in all, with most pages showing 5 videos. The last page has 3 videos. But like I mentioned, there are duplicate listing of at least several videos on those pages.
So the 117 video count at this site means you have 117 videos if you include the duplicate videos.
If you want to follow that system, then if a site has 10 video, and they list those 10 videos twice, then the site can claim 20 videos. Or even 100 videos, if they are sloppy enough to list their videos duplicate times in a list.
The models are real teens. Both the girls and the boys. The girls are OK, not really cute or super-attractive. On average, the models are less attractive than the teens you will see at random at a hometown mall. Maybe that's partly because the models appear to wear very little make-up to make themselves more attractive. The models' clothes are what they could buy at a thrift shop or the Salvation Army store.
The bottom line is, after watching a number of these videos, I start to find them mostly boring and a waste of time to watch. I much prefer the glamcore videos at X-Art or Diesel Access network, where an effort is made to present the models attractively. Or even Teen Mega World videos, where less effort is made to make the models attractive, but the physical attractiveness of the models is higer than the models at Young Sex Parties, and the overall quality of the videos is better than the Young Sex Parties videos.
In my opinion, the amateurish feel of the videos just means cheap production values, unattractive selection of models, cheap clothes and cheap settings.
I hope that I will find better videos at the other bonus sites in this network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-A huge amount of photosets, number of individual models, number of contributing photographers.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-I use DownThemAll download manager, which works at this site.
-Fast download speeds. I normally get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my maximum download speed.
-CCBill billing agent, which is one of the best credit card processors around.
-Search engine to allow you to search for models or photosets or photographers that you might like.
-Wide range of locations for the videos and photosets. In studios or houses, in fields, forests, at lakes or oceans or beach, they pose their lovely models to best advantage to show off these beauties.
Cons:
-The cons are basically minor. This is without a doubt the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
-The sheer size of the site (number of photosets, number of models, number of videos) appears to turn some people off. Instead of appreciating the massive amount of content, many people seem to
think the site has too many photosets to go through, and that, because there are so many gorgeous gils, that the models themselves are not as attractive as they really are.
-Metart has a patent on filming gorgeous naked teens and making the videos boring and a waste of time to watch. This is something I've wondered about for years: It's just a wasted opportunity of attractive models.
-The site will disappoint those looking for midcore or hardcore action. This is strictly a softcore site. No boys are in any photosets. If there are two girls in a photoset or video, their interaction is extremely softcore. No masturbation or fondling of the other girl.
Bottom Line:
As I've stated many time in the past, this is the finest softcore teen glamor site on the Internet.
There is an amazing amount of content. The site updates with 4 to 6 updates daily, which is just amazing for a single site.
Site statistics:
Number of photosets: 12,534
Number of videos: 1,045 Movies
Number of models: 2,766 Models
Number of contributing photographers: 250
Number of photos: 1,365,839
Those are staggering numbers, that blow past any softcore teen glamor site that I'm aware of.
Metart is the giant in the field, not just in terms of quantity, but also quality. Since it's start back in the late 1990s, Metart has featured high-quality teen softcore photography from leading photographers around the world.
The photosets are offered in three sizes for both online viewing and for download:
Low definition, medium definition, high definition.
The videos can be streamed or downloaded in three definitions as well: low, medium and high.
Metart was the site I picked for my first review for PU in 2008. At that time I gave the site a score of 97. That turned out to be the highest score I've ever given to any site. Since that time, the site has only increased the number of models and photosets and photographers. I think the review I did about 4 years ago is still basically accurate today.
One difference is that the Metart live shows/live chat have changed. Metart used to offer an in-
house live chat that featured a number of girls that were live each day for a number of hours
daily. The public shows were basically free. True, you could pay for a private show, or you could tip a girl during her public show. But it was basically a free source of entertainment, and the girls were friendly, and the shows were not designed to maximize the amount of money the members would pay to watch the show. That seems almost quaint today. Most live shows I've seen recently try to get the members to pay to watch the girls perform.
Metart no longer has the in-house live chat shows. Instead, they offer a link to a commercial live chat program designed to make money off the members. I believe it's cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private live cam show.
Lately, the site seems to have loosened their rules, and allow two girls to kiss in a photoset or video, but the kisses are almost chaste. The sample video in the preview pages gives a false impression the site has erotic videos. It's true the videos inside are of naked girls, and many of the models are attractive. But I can't emphasize enough how boring these videos are.
I complain about the boring videos. But because of the massive photoset content, the high quality of the photos, the number of photographers that contribute to this site, the site deserves its reputation as best in breed of teen softcore glamor sites. I gave the site a score of 97 about 4 years ago, and the site has only improved since then, adding more content, trying to make using the site easier to use over time, changing the default filenaming system to make the filenames more descriptive, and in other ways they try to make the site more user-friendly.
I am giving the site a score of 99.
How could they improve this site, to give it a perfect 100?
That would be a fantasy project:
1. They could delete almost all their
videos, and hire whoever shoots the videos at X-Art or the Diesel Access network. But that would mean a change in the Met-art philosophy, which stresses softcore porn.
2. They could send their models over to my house, where I could tell if their models are really as attracive as they look. At my age (I'm in my 60s), I couldn't do that much with these girls, but it sure would be nice to try. But that might be illegal. So maybe they could hire me as a stunt cock. Again, that would mean a change in their softcore approach. But maybe they could start a "Metart meets an aging fan reality show", because reality shows are very popular today.
Unfortunately, that's only in my dreams.
For $20/month with a PU discount, this site is a fantastic bargain. Or $99/year, which is an even better deal if you join the site for a month and believe the site is worth a long term membership. I think the site is like a museum of Most Erotic Teens, which I believe is the former name of the site, from which they changed it to MET-Art. For a softcore teen site, this is truly the best in show.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
+You get access to about 19 sites.
+A large percentage of the content is exclusif.
+You can downoad the videos in WMV and MP4.
+They offer each video in HD 1920x1080.
+Most of the videos have an accompanying photoset which can be downloaded as a single zip file. Resolution appeas to be about 1200 x 800 fo most pics.
+Each scene is tagged with some key words so it's possiible to search using those one or more of those keywords.
Cons:
-Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
-The site isn't really updating all that often anymore.
-A large part of the content is leased material which is available on many other sites.
-They mention access to first anal date but if you try the site then you are sent back to teens analyzed because they used all the content on first anal date to fill this site.
-They have a general search system but I tried using different keywords or names of performers and the results were bad to awful.
Bottom Line:
*The reason why I joined this site is because my membership gave me access to a bunch of sites that I've had my eye on for a few years now and there was no way I could pass up the opportunity to try them. Of course what often happens is that anticipation is never really satisfied and this time was no different. The vast majority of the sites have either badly shot, badly lit or downright crappy porn. There is an abundant amount of leased material aas well. Some of the sites don't have all that much content and they haven't actually updated in years.
*Now it's not all bad because I did find a few videos that were worth keeping and maybe someone else who is maybe less picky can find stuff that they want but be forwarned that expectation may need to be lowered.
*It's hard to say who will be happy with the content on this site or the other ones because it's quite possible that you already have some of their scenes from similar sites out there. I think that if you aren't too picky and prefer a certain amateur feel to your porn then you might find some nice gems here.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Some really cute girls have featured here over the years
Lots of material gathered of teen cuties
Not bad little setups to make it seem more real
Quite a lot of dirty talk so I liked that element.
Good fair valued price for the network.
Cons:
Huge downloads that are far to big to be practical then you are down to low quality, nothing inbetween.
Sadly very few girls here do anal, would of loved to of seen more of this.
Also very few group scenes, I'm a massive fan of the girl/girl/boy scenes and seen a couple on here but not seen many, would of been nice to of seen more of these. There was a nice one however with Karina White and Lily Carter.
Few too many tattoos, really un-feminine I find tat, so was put off by the amount of tats too these young girls have, I'll never understand the logic in making yourself get caked in these permanent things.
The network does bombard you lots now with ads for other site, becoming a trend amongst sites these days, can get annoying, cause I paid for this site, shouldn't in updates have updates from other sites I'm not a member of, I don't wanna see them.
Bottom Line:
I like Reality Kings mainly for this site, We Live Together and Moms Bang Teens. One thing I really didn't like though was the file sizes, they are huge beyond belief with the new movies they make. some 4gb or 5gb even I think I came across, I don't have that sort of room on my hard drive for movies that I think are only average, but then the next one down can be 400mb or less which is the other end of the spectrum and too lower quality for me. So I found a great tool free make video converter, it was free hence the name but was great for cutting down videos to a decent quality and size, I was downloading the big files and then putting them through this converter, took a while but you get a movie 720p which I find fine for me and weighed in at 1gb to 1.5gb which I could live with, if it looked like a movie I wasn't all that into I would go for the lower quality one.
I join this site's network probably once a year and this time there was some good movies that had been on site, some real hot girls and on a whole I'd say it has improved this last 6 months along with the other sites I like so I was pleased with that.
Overall I really like Pure18 and think its a great addition to the network and makes a change from the big butt obsession and VIP parties this network is fond of. It now has a nice mix with something for everyone, which is good, would be better if everything was exactly to my taste lol but you can't have everything.
Yeah I'd join again and always keep a close eyes on what updates they have here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Special discount from TBP/PU $17.87 instead of $24.87. From 21 January also special discount of $9.97 from PU Newsletter.
No DRM, download limits, pre checked cross sells, or regional discrimination. Recently ended pre checked cross selling.
High quality videos and pics, with good lighting and camerawork.
Epoch is billing agent, resulting in easy cancellation.
Easy log in, network remembers password.
Easy navigation and inviting home pages.
Many download and streaming options.
Zipped photos.
Attractive models with a little more body and ethnic diversity than some sites.
Little abuse of models.
Genuine network with each site having its own identity.
Mostly exclusive material, apart from Rub A Teen.
Very customer friendly. I believe a lot of thought has gone into the way the home pages are presented, and appear to customers.
Excellent webmaster Marvin as network representative at PU.
Downloads are named, you don't have to do it yourself.
Cons:
Condoms used nearly all the time on "Oye Loca." If you hate condoms it makes the site worthless, and it's one of the biggest sites on the network.
Tats tats tats. Far too many tattoos. There are the usual breast jobs too, but tats are everywhere.
Smaller than the large networks.
Some sites are small, and/or not updating.
A LOT of advertising links/upsells, plus when you first log in for the day you always have to decline the "special offer" upsell before you can access the network.
6 simultaneous download limit.
Slower daytime speeds here in UK.
No choice of WMV for HD. HD videos are mp4.
Bottom Line:
The impression I get of this network, is one that is run by people who want to have their satisfied customers keep coming back. For me the two biggest negatives resulted in my cancelling membership after only one month. I intend to come back when I have time to sift through and cherry pick material. The two negatives are tattoos and condoms.
Tats tats tats and more tats, tats everywhere. Nearly every clip I accessed seemed to have a model with a tattoo on some part of her body. I find that a big turn off. That combined with the presence of condoms on most of the Oye Loca scenes, making that site virtually redundant, meant that for me, a large part of the network was a no go area. It's a big shame because they are clearly trying very hard to be customer friendly.
Yes, tats everywhere, but they seem even more prevalent on Innocent High, where the girls look, how shall I put this.....more professional than on any of the other sites. Innocent? Yeah right, about as innocent as Charles Manson at a graduation party. I have this theory about the tattoos. Maybe the site operates in a similar way to the United States Postal Service or Royal Mail. Basically the girls have to be stamped before they can get through the doors. That would explain it all.
Each site has an individual appearance and style. Unlike other "networks" this one really is a collection of individual disparate sites with their own personality. "Oye Loca" has some beautiful little known Latin models. "She's New" goes for the amateurish approach, with young beautiful girls supposedly making their debuts, although many of the scenes are not boy girl hardcore. "Innocent High" has a lot of POV. Titty Attack caters for the fuller figure, and is one of my favourites, as is Her Freshman Year, and the unsung Team Skeet Extras. "Rub A Teen" is the only non exclusive material. Some sites are small and/or not updating. Below in "replies" is a list of sites on the network with scene counts, and last update (as of 24 January).
The home pages are generally good and navigation is easy. There are a number of download, streaming and browsing options. Streaming looks great, and is easy to use, with high medium and low options available. I have variable speeds here in the UK, being generally faster in the evening to night, and slower in the afternoon to early evening. There is a "default viewing option" where you can set your favourite way a scene is displayed, when a page is loaded. You can have Preview, Full Flash Movie, Best Of Movie, Third Clips, One Minute Clips, Pictures, Screencaps, Trailer, and there's an "add to favourites" option.
They really do seem to be making the place customer friendly, and Marvin is an excellent webmaster representative at PU. A lot of thought has gone into design and navigation. For instance, when hovering the mouse over a home page picture, you get a few screencap samplers, just enough and done in just the right way to give you an idea of the material. Unfortunately the one thing that overwhelmingly lets this side of things down, and clutters up the members' areas, is the huge amount of upsells and links. You even have to navigate an upsell when first logging in. You must decline the offer before being able to access the network. Apart from that, logging in is easy, and your password is stored across the network.
Lighting, photography, thoughtful angles, and high spec, means the material looks great. Their greatest strength is the quality of the videos, although the pics look good too. Team Skeet is similar to other sites in taking too many pics all looking the same, but the pics they have, do look good.
Generalising across the network I have come to the conclusion the models have slightly more body shape and ethnic diversity than some networks. There is a lack of anal, with most of the scenes being straight boy/girl, with some solo and lesbian. There is little abuse of models, hair pulling, insulting, ass slapping, or gagging. The male leads and cameramen tend to be low profile, thankfully. In tone I would say it's similar to 18 Eighteen/Score or Karups, a sort of light hardcore.
Newest update video download options are 1080 HD, 720 HD, HI mpg4, LOW mpg4, WMV, IPod. There appears to be a six simultaneous download limit. The HD downloads are mp4, Best WMV nowadays is 960x540 at 1500- 2500 kb/s, or 640x480 at 1500-2500 kbs. Older clips have lower spec. Pictures are mostly 1050x700, sometimes 1050x590. Screencaps mostly 720x405.
If you prefer WMV, they have changed their high spec videos from WMV to mp4. On the latest updates there is no longer a WMV high spec option, only a medium spec 960x540 or 640x480. That means a difference between1280x720 at 7000 kb/s and 960x540 at 1500-2500 kb/s or 640x480 at 1500-2500kb/s.
Overall a worthwhile membership, which I would recommend to any PU'er. A real network with character, and great material, which is customer friendly. I will be back.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+A nice selection of 251 Eastern European models between the ages of 18 and 20 years old.
+Nearly 950 photosets to view online or dowloand.
+All photosets can be downloaded as a single zip file and resolution varies from 800x1200 to 1067x1600.
+All the content is dated.
Cons:
-Only 195 videos and most of these are broken up into 3 or more small clips.
-The vast majority of the content is solo with the odd toy use and a few b/g scenes.
-Site is now dead because the last update is in 2008.
-I'm not sure how much of the content is exclusif (if any) but I know that some of it is leased.
-Most of the models are given a name that is not the one they are usually known under.
-There is a search box but I tried different things and the results were not very good.
-Some of the models have only photosets while others have only videos.
Bottom Line:
*Let me first say that I got access to this site through my teens analyzed membership and I am glad that I didn't actually fork any money over for this unimpressive site.
*Here are the things they do right. They have a wide selection of mostly teen models that should please most peoples taste. The bulk of the content is solo teasing with a very nice mix of clothed to all nude with an emphasis on showing the entire body rather than concentrating on just a few parts. Some of the models have more than one set or video so that can be great if she is one of your favorites.
*Here are the things they do wrong. Most of the models only have one or two phototsets and/or videos so unless you luck in then you are not going to get much out of this site. Part of the content is leased material and quite old now. Renaming models is so annoying because it makes finding their more common name much harder.
**The bottom line is that this is a very poor stand alone site even for the most ardent fan of softcore porn and this is made worse by the fact that it's pretty old and contains some leased material.
**I can't recommend to anyone unless the content from the other sites you get appeals to you and my score is based on that reason.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They have some cute Eastern European models.
+Part of their content is exclusif.
+Videos can be dowloaded in 1280x720 resolution.
Cons:
-Site is tiny with only 32 videos and not really updating with new content.
-The content is dated but they must change the date on a regular basis because the oldest scenes is dated in 2012 but the site has been active since 2009.
-A percentage of the content is leased material that is available on amny other sites.
-They have a search option but since they don't have tags or do not name any of the models so I'm not sure what you would search.
-The site is cluttered with third party advertising and there's no way to escape it no matter on which page you are.
Bottom Line:
*I got access to this site with my teen analyzed membership and am I glad I did because this was always a site on my possible join list and I would have been royally pissed if i had paid any amount for this unimpressive site.
*This is not a very good site but they do have some nice videos and the girls are all pretty cute. of course you probably already have them if you are member of Eastern European pon sites but even if you don't then you probably have a similar scene with the same girl.
**There is very little to recommend this site. If you like the girls on the preview section than join TMW and you will probably get the same videos or very similar for less money and better quality.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge number of attractive models going back over a decade! I think its well over 2000 girls.
Updates include 3 photo sets a day (6 days a week), and 1 or 2 videos a day
Content appears to be exclusive (except for the feeds)
Photos and videos have just the right amount of explicitness for me (meaning pussy close ups and spreads, but nothing extreme like gaping or speculums). No pussy shy girls here!
Photo sets have a good variety of poses-front view, rear view, laying down, doggy
Flash player for videos works well-I can scan through a video very quickly to see if I want to download it.
Zip files for photo sets have unique names--no need to type in a name when downloading.
Cons:
My biggest gripe is the with the site layout and navigation. There doesn't seem to be a way to list ALL photo sets by date, or all models by date of first appearance. This makes it a little bit of work to view all the new material posted since my last membership there (you have to go through 5 different photo categories to do this).
The solo girl videos (which usually involve a quick strip and masturbation) are kind of hit or miss. Some girls give good performances, others seem a bit apprehensive. I would prefer for the stripping to be slower and more seductive. I don't see a lot of real girl cum here, again suggesting maybe the girls aren't really relaxed.
The camera guys shooting the videos tilt their cameras way too much!
The boy/girl hardcore vids have improved since the last time I was there, but I still rarely find any worth downloading.
The photo/video sets have too many chairs and sofas, and not enough beds. The furniture could be more upscale too.
Bottom Line:
KarupsPC is primarily a solo girl photo/video site. Each model typically shoots 5 photo sets and 3 videos. The more popular girls have more than this. Some of the models do hardcore B/G videos (most do solo vids only), but recently these have averaged only about 1 a week. For example, in the last 3 months of 2012, there were 117 solo girl videos, 13 B/G hardcore videos, and 2 G/G lesbian videos. The hardcore videos have decreased in number from a couple of years ago (possibly due to the syphillis outbreak and new Russian porn law).
The models are generally attractive, although there are more "7s" and "8s" here than at some other sites like Met-Art and Femjoy. They do have their share of beautiful girls, and it seems like all of the most popular Euro girls have some material here.
The photo sets have zips and come in 3 resolutions: 1024p, 1500p, and 3000p (long dimension pixels). Older sets have only 1024 and 1500. I am not certain, but it appears that some (maybe all) of the photo sets are vid caps from the videos. There are never any flashes going off in the videos, and the photo set that corresponds to the videos doesn't seem to be noticeably different. Again, I am not sure about this. Having said that, the photo sets are well lit and in focus, and generally well done.
I noted above that there are very few if any "pussy shy" girls here. Just the right amount of explicitness for me. Also, some other things that you DON'T find here: pissing, speculums, huge dildos, public nudity, and I don't remember any anal action either (certainly not with dildos). I only found 1 video with "squirting". All of this is fine with me, as I am not into any of the above.
The 50 most recent photo sets and 33 most recent videos are on the home page. The homepage also has 2 buttons for the videos (Hardcore and Softcore). The photosets have 7 buttons/categories, and I really don't know why, as they are so similar. Those categories are Amateurs, Exotics, Girls with Toys, Hardcore, Models, Older Women, and Teens. I wish they would put them all on one main page organized by date, and then have the buttons. The search feature is OK, but needs more categories. It's a little work to get through all their content (of course they have a lot of content!).
The sets for the photos and videos are pretty basic, and as I mentioned above, they have too many chairs and sofas. Sometimes the models just don't look comfortable. They used to have some horrible painted sets with loud colors and painted bricks, but it appears that those are history. A little more variety would be nice. And more beds too.
The videos come in 3 resolutions: mobile, "medium", and HD. The HD is 720p (I don't remember any 1080p), but it still looks very good when full-screened on my 17" laptop monitor (my monitor is 1080p). I'm not sure what resolution the medium vids are, as I only download the HD. The videos come in MP4 and WMV formats. The flash player works very well, and is a big improvement from the last time I was there. The older videos (5 years or so old) are usually in 2 to 4 parts--I remember having to download and join those (ughhh). It would be nice if they could join the older ones for us.
The hardcore B/G videos are not a main feature of this site (at least, the ones done with their models). Apparently some of the members have requested more hardcore, so in response to this, they have several different "feeds". The main hardcore feed has a huge amount of material, but to me it is B and C grade stuff with B and C grade models. It also is not shot in the same style as their hardcore, so I really don't know why they bother. They also have video and photo feeds from Viv Thomas, but the videos are not HD (pity because many of those are good), and the photo sets don't have zips. They also have a webcam feed (which I didn't bother with) and several others including Sex TV, Paradise Feeds, and Whore Hunter. None of the feeds really interested me, and it would be nice if there was an option to join the site without these, as I am sure everyone is paying for them.
The Karups hardcore B/G videos were nothing special for me. In particular, the girls just don't look like they are really enjoying themselves. Another pet peeve, every freaking one that I've seen ends with a facial cumshot. Please Karups, add a little variety here! There has been some change in the videos--most are longer than I remember and less repetitive, but I still don't find many worth downloading. The rare girl/girl videos are better, with some on par with the better lesbian vid sites.
Bottom line: Despite all my nit picking, KarupsPC is a solid solo girl photo/video site. I have been a member there 5 times now in as many years, and always find a lot of good material to download when I go back. A first time member should do the 3 month membership, as 1 month is no way enough time to work through all of their content.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Found 6 scenes which I rated 7.0 /10 or better that need editing.
* Found two new models I was unaware with good skill.
* 189 scenes currently available for download
* Downloads pretty quick
* 2 scenes Buck shot are now mp4
* Some scenes were shot in the role playing mode.
* Purchased content is better quality video production values than original vids.
Cons:
* Not very easy to find models except to open up the download screen and see the title attached to the file.
* Video quality very poor - not much better than what you'd see on a tube site.
* Scenes are starting to get recycled - one scene was repeated three times (his famous Kalyn cheerleader, head over the couch, throat fuck with her throat bulging, while she flails away, to no avail, in panic).
* While each scene has a description you can't tell the original content from the purchased content.
* Two ways to see if scene has entertainment value - view online (very frustrating) or download. No thumbnails to even give you a hint.
* While Buck tried, I think, to make his original content "Roll Playing Amateur", his POV, lighting and editing leaves a lot to be desired.
Bottom Line:
Last night was my first night and I started thinking about this review, I remembered a 3 card monte game I came across in Mexico. After thinking I knew what was going on I threw down a 100 peso bill and immediately lost. That's how I felt like my $30 was taken.
Today however, I've covered all the content (took about four hours) and feel like the price is still a little over the top considering the age and quality of the content but I'm okay with it.
I will edit down the "keepers" for content and will post the $/min I got out of it.
It's hard to figure out how old the scenes Buck shot but seeing that Aaliyah Jolie and Carmen Minor were a couple of his repeat models, at least 3 years old (They both left the biz in 2010).
I found it interesting that another model of interest, Kaitlyn (or Kaitlynn) is not traceable (no last name) though she was the most used model. While I realize that some sites like to give different names, I find that following a model under those circumstances most frustrating. One humorous aside, Kaitlyn had the craziest eyebrows I've ever seen - they looked like they were drawn on by a very drunk person.
FYI - the famous over the couch throat fuck of Kalyn lasted 21 seconds and consisted of 30 thrusts down her throat.
Purchased content is teen anal themed for the most part and as far I was concerned pretty standard fare. It also brought home how much I hate the European male awww & hiss dialogue that permeates these type of films. I did find humor in the one scene where they couple goes from anal doggy to reverse cowboy anal and he inadvertently smacks her head against the headboard. Just about the only real thing I saw happening.
This site would be hard to recommend to my neighbors though if you are intrigued by what some of his original content contains (dirty atm, painful anal, force throating, mostly young inexperience teens, pregnant sex) then there is really only one way to find out and it will cost you $30 bucks.
As I said earlier, I'm going to edit though some of what I downloaded into one extended scene and will tell you then what it cost.
Of the approximately 3852 mins of content, I came away with 21 mins of stuff I wanted which works out to $1.43 a min.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Attractive, often gorgeous models, often shot early in their careers. Upscale location(s) for the photo shoots help out too.
-Excellent video quality! The HD videos are really good!
-I really like the pussy close up videos-they are very well done.
-Many of the masturbation videos end with real orgasms and oozing girl cum.
-Most of the models have an interview video that does a good job of letting you get to know them a little better. The models can also post a comment on their experience with FTV after the shoot is done.
-They do have occasional lesbian videos which I think are well done. I really liked Malena Morgan and her gf.
Cons:
-the photo sets are almost an after-thought, and although they are pretty good in general, the one thing they lack is size (many are only 1500 px on the long dimension). This is probably my biggest gripe, especially since they have so many really hot models.
-site navigation could be improved with a better search engine. Its organized by update date, and you can search models alphabetically. Having said that, from my perspective there really are no search tags that can reliably find models I really like. You never really know until you watch their videos.
-there seems to be just a few main locations that most of the videos are shot, so you will start to recognize them again and again. One place that they use for most of the outdoor shoots is some type of office building--usually there aren't many people around, so it appears they go out there on the weekends. There is also a nice house (mansion really) that they use for the indoor shoots. Still, more variety would be nice.
Bottom Line:
FTV stands for "first time videos", and while it may not be true for every model that FTV was her first porn shoot, its probably not far off. Many of the girls still have a youthful energy and innocence that you usually don't see in your average experienced porn star.
FTV has been around for quite a while, so there is a lot of content to go through if you are a first time member. It took me 4 months to go through the most recent three years or so. The updates only come once a week (one new model, each with about 9 to 12 videos and 4 or 5 photo sets), so its not a site that I would stay joined to forever. Rather, its the type of site that you go back to once a year or so, after your initial membership.
FTV has a few themes that feature heavily in its videos: public nudity and flashing (usually 2 or 3 of a models vids will include this); masturbating with extremely large dildos, vegetables, and/or hands (fisting); and real masturbation videos that often include extreme pussy close ups. The public nudity and extreme insertions don't really do much for me, but I love their masturbation and pussy close up videos. That along with the model interviews, "freshness" of the models, and excellent video quality are what I really liked about this site.
Bottom line: there is a huge amount of quality content here. Definitely worth joining!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-Get a confirming email on signup.
-Currently a discounted price of $17.87/month.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I average 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Videos have date they were posted to the site.
-Nice selection of attractive teen models.
Cons:
-Most of the cons are basically minor.
-Thumbnails of other sites that are being advertised are present on the members pages.
-Need to un-check the pre-checked offer at signup.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Most of the videos at the Rub A Teen site were previously posted at Tricky Masseur(TeenMegaWorld network). But Rub A Teen offers those videos in a higher definition.
The Team Skeet network focuses on teen hardcore videos. The video quality is high grade. The videos are mainly professionally shot. Good lighting, good camera work, good focus, etc.
You get a choice of several definitions for both streaming and downloading.
For streaming, you can choose low, medium or high definition.
For download, you can choose 1080p, 720p, or lower definitions. They also offer a file for iPods.
You also get photosets of many of the videos. The photos are good quality. Below what you will find at major photo sites like MetArt or MPL Studios. But better than screen caps.
Minor nitpick: The site Innocent High features models that are supposed to be in high school. But because of the models' ages, it would be better to name them College Pros. None of the models I saw showed any innocence or hesitation about fucking and sucking their brains out.
The network has over 1,000 videos. The average runtime is between 20-30 minutes. Many of the models are real teens. Some models appear to be in their early twenties. There are a large number of very attractive young girls. So for a reduced price of $17.87/month with the PU/TBP discount, you gain access to a large number of hardcore teen videos that are professionally shot.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Updated:
12-30-1203:26am (Update History) Reason: Added important info about the shortcomings of the search engine
Pros:
Met-Art has a huge number of very attractive models (2700+). A new user could easily spend months going through the entire site. They usually have 4 to 6 updates a day. Excellent photography overall. This is primarily a photo site. They have videos, but they are very soft core. It is also primarily a solo girl site--the occasional "lesbian" sets are really just 2 girls posing together. Another thing worth noting (not necessarily a "pro") is that their Met Live Cams is just their name branded version of Streamate. I don't think there is any advantage to accessing it through their website, and I've only seen one Met-Art model there (Malena Morgan). The main attraction here is the huge volume of quality photos of beautiful naked women.
Cons:
The videos are way too soft core for my taste. They are really just an extension of the photo sets. There is no masturbation and not enough explicitness in the videos for me. The site seems to have a rule against the models touching themselves, so there is no pussy spreading here. Too many models don't do explicit pussy photos. The 2-girl photo sets are not lesbian photo sets--they are pretend lesbian photo sets. There is rarely any actual kissing, and no pussy play etc. I guess the site has a rule against actual sex. I know thats their niche, but it does get annoying sometimes. Many other sites have shown that it can be done tastefully. Some of the photo sets do suffer from less than top quality lighting (this seems to be an issue with some of the European photogs). A lot of the sets have too many redundant photos--by that I mean photos that are nearly identical. This makes many of the sets unnecessarily large. Some user submitted search tags do not seem to work at all.
Bottom Line:
Probably the best soft-core porn site out there, with a huge number of very attractive girls, quality photography, and lots of daily updates.
One month is nowhere near enough time to explore all of the content. In fact, narrowing down the 2700+ models to find the ones you like is the most problematical aspect of Met-Art. Their search engine uses 9 standard tags (e.g. hair color, breast size, etc), and this is useful to a degree. They also have user submitted search tags which potentially could be much more useful. For example, you can search using the term "beach". However, many of the user submitted search tags do not return all sets that have that tag. One example is the term "perfect pussy". Its in the 100 most popular user submitted tags, but when you enter it, only 15 sets are found, all of which have the word "perfect" in the name of the set. It would be very useful if they could get that fixed. Bottom line though, this a must join site, even if you only try it for a month.
Update: I contacted Met-Art support about the user submitted search tags not working. The next day I got an email back from them, stating that they had corrected the problem (I checked, and they did), and as a way of thanking me for alerting them to the problem, they gave me a free two week trial to one of their other sites! Sweet!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- An excellent network of teen-oriented sites
- 14 sites available
- Network continues to grow (new sites added recently)
- Updates regularly
- Many incredibly beautiful young (18+) models, many early in their careers
- TBP / PU Discount
- No download limit
- Permits download managers
- Streaming available
- Photos available
- Bills through Epoch
Cons:
- Download speeds are a bit less than I get at competitor sites
- The search function has less function in the member’s section than on the preview pages
- I’d prefer more anal scenes
Bottom Line:
I have to admit to being a bit surprised that this network hasn’t been reviewed more often here. I’m guessing that part of this is just due to the wide variety of interests within the PU community such that a great teen-themed site goes without the attention it might get if everyone shared my (limited) interests.
The network is a collection of 14 sites and each of them is either specifically teen-oriented (18+, of course) or has a non-teen-specific theme but still uses the freshest faces available. Of all the sites, only one, Her Freshman Year, doesn’t appear to be updating. This isn’t a deal-breaker though since it is a relatively generic theme that is easily satisfied with several of the other sites on the network. If there is one usual theme not represented by a site it would be anal sex. The whole network only has 32 anal scenes out of the 1000+ available. If it wasn’t for the exceptional teens I might just take this as a personal insult.
The network also includes a massage-themed site called Rub-a-Teen. This site has stirred up a bit of controversy around here because it is a clone of the Tricky Masseur site at Teen Mega World. The site sticks out for two reasons – it appears to be the only non-exclusive site on the network (I might be wrong on that though) and it is the only site that has non-U.S., non-English speaking models – apart from the Latina site. I don’t hold it against the network that they bought a whole site, but I’d have preferred to join this network to get it rather than Teen Mega World. And honestly, I’ll bet that if the guys behind this network made their own massage stuff it would be top quality.
When I last joined this network about 18 months ago I found it to have great porn but the technical bits were a bit dated. There were limited choices for file formats and their definition of HD was a bit loose. The good news is that this is no longer the case: in October 2011 the network rolled out mp4 as their standard format and all new scenes are available in three resolutions, including 720p and 1080p. One WMV file is still available as is a file size for mobile users. I downloaded the 720p and those come in at 1280x720 at a 2400kb/s bitrate and 30fps. They look great on a monitor and I suspect they’ll look fine on a TV when I get around to trying that.
Each of the scenes is available in a variety of ways (in segments, full scene, etc.) so most users will find what they’re looking for. I may not understand why the network has so many options, but I appreciate that they do and I think this shows their positive attitude to members.
Photos are also available – as singles and zips – and as stand-alone and screencaps. I wouldn’t call this a photo site but for those who like photos you can get a fix too.
Other positives are that the site bills through Epoch, allows download managers with no obvious timeouts, and doesn’t impose any download limit.
There are some negatives, but I don’t want to over-emphasize these as they really are minor in light of the overall quality of the network. The most serious of these negatives is the search function. Full disclosure here – I might be dead wrong on this, but I searched and tried for an hour and couldn’t find a solution. Here’s the weird issue with the search function: each scene has a series of tags. The tags can be used to sort the scenes. But… when you’re on the preview page the sort function works to narrow your choices, which is, I assume, what it is intended to do. You want “blonde,” “footjob” and glasses? On the preview page you’ll be left with the precise scenes that have those three elements. When you’re in the member’s section though, the tags just pile on each other. Select “blonde” and you get any scene with that. Add “footjob” and you get all the footjob scenes on the network rather than just the footjob scenes with blondes, which means you get a lot of stuff you don’t want. I looked long and hard and can’t find a way to make the tag filter work when in the member section. If I’m wrong, please say so in a comment.
Other minor negatives are that the download speeds are a bit slower than I’m used to. Not enough to really complain, but noticeable mostly because the site is so well done that this minor issue sticks out.
This is neither a negative or a positive, it just is, but given the newness of some of the models they’re only doing solo stuff at this point. This is a bit disappointing but if that’s the choice of the models then I can’t criticize the network for that. I’m just stating this as a fact.
This is a great network that continues to add sites and scenes. One scene is added per day, spread over the 13 updating sites. I think this is a great network even at full price, but at the TBP discount it is a must-have for anyone who likes teen-themed, high quality porn. Not only do I recommend it, I’ll definitely be back again and again.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of a large teen-themed network
- Close to 350 videos now uploaded
- Updates regularly but not on any obvious schedule
- Site now offers HD in mp4 format
- Bills through Epoch
- Supports download managers
- Many new models just starting out in the adult business
Cons:
- Slower download speeds than with similar networks
- The same male talent appears too often
- Not much anal
Bottom Line:
I’m a huge fan of teen-themed sites with the young models (18-20ish) playing schoolgirls. I suspect that this is a common fetish for a lot of men. While this is a niche that is served fairly well, I’d never say no to a well-done site, and this is a pretty decent site.
This is the second time I’ve been a member here and was enticed to join when the network (Team Skeet) offered a special discount on top of the discount they already offer us. I liked the site the first time I was a member there and they’ve made some improvements that made it worth a revisit.
As I noted last time, the theme is schoolgirls and the setting is almost always a classroom. This obviously limits the kinds of scene setups that are available which can make the scenes a bit repetitive. There are only so many scenarios that can be done within these limits and they’ve done them all frequently. The good news, however, is that even though the scene set-ups can be repetitive the model’s appearance and ‘skills’ keep the scenes interesting. The site books some of the freshest new faces in porn so it is worth a membership just to see the latest crop of models.
The site is quite large offering just shy of 350 scenes. It continues to update but the update schedule is fairly irregular. There is at least one update per month though there are many months with three or four updates. Keep in mind that this site is part of a network so the other sites are updating too.
The biggest change that happened since I was last a member here 18 months ago is a significant improvement in video quality. When I was last a member here the only file format was WMV and while they advertised the scenes as being available in HD their definition of HD was pretty loose. Starting in October 2011 the site made a big move forward by offering true HD in mp4 format. A decent resolution WMV is still available but the scenes are now also offered in mp4 SD, 720p HD and 1080p HD. In the interests of balancing video quality with hard drive space I opted for the 720p. Those come in at 1280x720 at a 2400kb/s bitrate and 30fps. Subjectively they look great and I can safely assume that the 1080p would look even better.
The negatives to this site are pretty minor, and some of them are also admittedly subjective. The one objective problem is that download speeds still tend to be lower than I expect at a quality site like this. I’m used to seeing near 7MB/s with Internet Download Manager and most of the time here I was getting no more than 4MB/s. (As an aside, TBP’s review notes that there may be a download limit and that there may be issues with download managers. I had no problems. The site’s TOS does say that they ‘may’ impose a limit but I purposely went looking to see if I’d get shut out and I called it quits at 30+GB in one day and had no limit imposed. Also, I had no issues using a download manager and the links didn’t time out.)
The other negatives are, admittedly, subjective. The site uses the same male talent in a lot of their scenes and I find that makes the scenes even more repetitive. I think of the male talent in a straight porn scene as furniture, but I do wish these guys would change the furniture more frequently. The last (subjective) negative is that on a site with almost 350 scenes there are only three anal scenes. I realize that this is likely a reflection of the newness of many of the models, but guys, give the members some variety!
The last time I reviewed this site I found it to be a great value because of the combination of some great teen-themed porn and a TBP discount. With more scenes available and being added regularly this site continues to be a great value and if this is your kind of porn then I’d highly recommend joining. (And if you act soon the extra discount may still be available.)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Large network (nearly 3000 scenes)
- Network updates daily with one scene per day for the network
- Great teen-themed network
- Beautiful Russian and Eastern European models
- Decent proportion of anal scenes (though this is definitely NOT an anal-themed network
- Supports download managers
- No obvious time-outs for downloads
- No download limits
- Several under-served niches are here
- TBP / PU discount ($20 instead of $30)
Cons:
- Non-English-speaking models can cause the heat to be turned down a bit
- Several sites not updating
- Download speeds can vary and are generally lower than average
Bottom Line:
I know this network has some detractors here but I’m definitely not one of them. This network wasn’t even on my list of ‘must haves’ but I joined it to get access to sites that feature under-served niches like young women (18-20) with older men, for example, and I’m glad that I joined. One advantage I have is that while many members here state that the site has lost its edge I have nothing to compare that to so the site still looks great to me. If you join now you likely won’t be disappointed.
The entire network has a theme of promoting young (18-20) Eastern European and Russian models. There are 36 listed sites (but two of them are network duplicates) that offer these models in a variety of niches. The most common niches are here, which is good, but the better news is that several under-served niches are here too. For example, there is a massage site, a nylons site, a voyeur site and an old-and-young site. The network is large, offering just shy of 3000 scenes now.
The network is still active with one new scene being added per day. That’s one scene per day for the network, not for each site. Several of the sites haven’t updated in a while so they may no be updating at all now.
Each site opens into its own page where you see 10 scenes per page. Clicking on a scene you want to see opens it in a new page where you can either stream or download the video. I don’t use streaming so I can’t really pronounce on it, but the streams aren’t offered in different resolutions. The good news is that unlike many other sites the stream doesn’t start automatically. The site layout is simple, effective and easy to use.
The downloads are a bit odd in that while there are options those options are limited. Unlike other similar networks where you can choose any number of resolutions in your preferred format this network doesn’t offer that. For each scene there are usually options, but each resolution is offered in a different format. So if you want a particular resolution (and file size) you can’t choose the format: you’re stuck with the encoding that the network chose.
If photos are available, they’re well hidden because I didn’t see them. I don’t normally download photos either so I have to admit that I didn’t look that hard.
The biggest advantage for the network is the look of the models. I don’t normally take memberships to sites with Russian and Eastern European models but there is no good reason for this, especially since it seems that so many of the newest and most beautiful models are now coming out of Russia and Eastern Europe. This network is no exception: many of the models are new to me and many of them are incredibly beautiful.
This may be a pro or a con depending on your view, but while the network isn’t anally-themed (though there is one anal site – Anal Angels) there is a decent amount of anal sex here. I’d prefer more, so that should be an indication for non-anal-fans that the site isn’t overwhelmed by anal scenes. I’d say the proportion is about right.
Some minor positives are that the network offers a TBP/PU discount and it bills through Epoch. They also allow download managers and there are no obvious timeouts on the links. There are also no download limits.
The site does have some negatives. Objectively, the limited download options is a problem (see above). Also, the download speeds can vary quite a bit. I’m used to seeing speeds approaching 7MB/s and I admit that this occurred here, but it was more common to see speeds about half that rate. The lowest speeds I saw were down around 1MB/s but those only occurred at what I assume were peak download times in Europe.
This is a purely subjective negative, but I find that when the models don’t speak English that takes some of the heat away from the scene. I’m a big fan of the scene set up and when you can’t understand what the models are saying it seems to turn the heat down a bit. This reason alone isn’t a deal-breaker because so many of the models are stunningly beautiful, but if you plan to join you should be aware of this.
The bottom line is that the positives far outweigh the minor negatives to make this network a good value. Yes, they could offer more download options and the download speeds could be more consistent, but the large network size, the access to under-served niches and especially the stunning models make this a worthwhile membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- A long-running site that is a good place to start as a porn collector.
- 1920x1080 on the videos over the last 3 years
- Pictures come zipped
- Weekly update could be considered a con
- They do continuously get amateur models in their first or at least close to their first shoots
- Good download speeds, around 90% of my max download speed.
Cons:
- My biggest gripe is with the pictures. I never understood the purpose of having a "superpic" section where the webmaster decides to put 3000 high end and 4000 high end zips for his favorite sets. These are not that often and the vast majority of sets are only 1600 high end.
- Has been in a slow decline, could be because I've joined it once or twice a year, will further in BL.
- That one weekly update just isn't enough and will further this as well.
- No real reason to complain about it since they do separate the videos into parts based on the action, but it's becoming a con to me not to be able to download full scenes.
Bottom Line:
FTV has had its really strong years. If you've never joined the site would score higher than I'm scoring it, but I just can't give it a higher score based on my most recent join.
I'll start by saying I had everything I wanted from the site up until March 2011's updates. I have always liked their style of photography and most of the videos as well and have kept those on an external. I probably wouldn't have rejoined if not for a promo that dropped the price nearly in half. Even then, as a returning member, I'm not for sure I feel like I got my money's worth. For this whole membership, I downloaded and will keep:
14 models, videos and pictures.
I'm sure the everyone has different tastes rule applies here, but only 14 models appealing to me out of 70-75 since my last membership just isn't good, at least not for me. In comparison, I have over 200 FTV models, so you can see how it has declined for me. I would normally find 30-40 per year I liked, this time it was 14 in 20 months.
It's possible it could be more than just the model's not appealing to me. The scenes, similar to how they have always been, have several videos for each model being more playful and acting silly than being nude. Maybe I'm just getting older and find those more irritating than cute? So you can decide on that one. If you like that style of porn you can disregard my negativity towards it.
The picture size is a no longer an excuse situation. Saying we're going to post 3000 or 4000 high end resolution photos on our (FTV) favorite sets and make the other 90% or higher only 1600 high end is unacceptable to me. You're catering to members not your own taste or maybe I'm wrong on that.
What this equals for me is a site that isn't appealing to me with as many models. Then you just get one update per week with a 1/5 chance I'm going to even like that model, only 4 updates per month, so my 1/5 chance isn't looking so good. A premium price if you join it without a promo, only to find out you only get the highest resolution photos for the sets they pick to do those high resolution ones on. Videos broken up into parts and the scroll like mad navigation, all of which are minor problems by themselves, but when added together make for a big problem. Something has to give. Either the price goes down or more updates or added or you give full scene downloads or you give 3000x4000 resolution pictures on all sets. Or be daring, give them all for the premium price and I won't bitch about the price.
Having said all this, I won't throw FTV completely under the bus, so to speak. They have their strengths. You will see pornstars you know of, but most of their sets were shot early in the model's career. You do get to see a different side of the models than on nearly all other sites. And when they do it, you get some of the best exhibitionism content available. If you've never joined it, I would give it one of my highest recommendations for a first time membership. You also will see some models you've never seen before and probably won't see them ever again. The video quality is as crystal clear in 1920x1080 as any 1080p porn videos I've seen. I think that just hurts the lower resolution photos since it's obvious they have the ability to shoot extremely high quality video. And the superpics section ends up becoming more of a poke from them to say, "we could be giving you these resolution photos on every set". May not be their intentions, but it sure seems that way.
I also don't care for the girl/girl content which has become more common. This just goes into a whole feeling of, there are lesbian sex sites out there that do it better. I didn't list this in cons though since it's no worse than having a pretty girl do cartwheels for 5 minutes. I do get the feeling and have had the feeling before that as a member, you're going to get content based on what the webmaster likes or has fetishes for and still feel that way. I would like to see more variation in the models too. There has never been a maximum age limit on the models and they used to shoot more mid to late 20s models. It now seems like a purely teen site in the newer updates.
As I'm leading to recommending it, there has to be some stipulations added here. If you've never been a member or have only been a member once or twice, it's still a definite join and recommendation. If you're like me and have the majority of the archive and are only missing the last year or so, look at the previews and decide if enough of the models would appeal to you. I should have, but I was shocked to find a promo through, I think Twistys, that I just jumped on the deal before checking out the newer updates. I'm running out of room, but will add a comment about what seems to be a slightly different version of their site, not for sure if it's a mobile version or if it's a new format since the promo I used sent me to it instead of the regular site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the large Teen Mega World network
- 93 scenes available
- Beautiful Russian and Eastern European models
- Allows download managers
- Bills through Epoch
- TBP / PU discount
Cons:
- Updates infrequently
- Language reduces heat
- Slower than average download speeds
- Limited options for video download
Bottom Line:
I’m a big fan of the massage niche and will usually try a site at least once to get access to new material, as I did here. One advantage with this site is that is that it gives you access to the entire Teen Mega World network. The name of the network should be an indication that the network and the sites within it aren’t for everyone: the site owners take the teen theme seriously so the only models here are beautiful young (18-20) Russian and Eastern European models. If your tastes are for older women, you probably won’t like this site or the network. (But for those of us who do prefer younger and more petite models, this site and the network are great.)
The site currently has 93 scenes available. The scenes follow the usual setup used in the massage niche: model walks in to get a massage from a male masseur, she undresses and gets on the table under a sheet or towel, the massage begins with the masseur slowly exposing more of the model as he massages her, eventually she’s naked and the fun begins. While this can be repetitive it can also increase the heat of the scene if it is done right. The right chemistry between the models and the right amount of tease can make for a great scene.
But… here’s where TM has a bit of a problem. I realize that this is very subjective and is beyond the control of the site so I won’t say this is a negative and I didn’t consider it when assessing a score. The problem is that in most massage scenes a lot of the heat is built by the interaction between the male and female models. But since this site uses Russian and Eastern European models they don’t speak English so the viewer loses a key element of that interaction. The site does use subtitles which certainly helps, but it doesn’t generate the tease and heat of a site that uses English-speaking models. The language issue is partly offset by the female models though, as most of them are incredibly beautiful.
The site layout is simple and easy to use. Each page has ten scenes listed with basic information about that scene. Clicking on a scene opens a new page where you can stream or download the scene. I didn’t try the streaming so I can’t comment on that. The scenes are available as one complete file or in parts. I only downloaded the complete scene so I can’t comment on the scene in parts either.
When it comes to downloading the scenes the site has made a choice that seems a bit odd. I don’t know enough technical stuff to understand why they’d do it this way, but I’m assuming that there is a reason. On most sites there are multiple file formats and sizes available. So, for example, you might prefer WMV files and those are available in two or three resolutions. If you prefer mp4 files, those are available too and in multiple resolutions. Here the choices are a bit different: there are multiple file sizes available but each one uses a different format: the high resolution is a WMV, there is a medium resolution in either MKV or FLV format and a resolution for mobile devices that comes as an mp4. So if you prefer WMV format but don’t want a 1GB file you’re out of luck.
I’m fine with WMV so I downloaded the highest resolution available which is in that format. Even the oldest scenes on the site (which aren’t that old – the first scene was uploaded on November 28, 2010) come in at 1280x720 at 4800+kb/s and 25fps. They use WMV Codec 9. Subjectively they look great. I can’t speak for the lower resolution files as I didn’t download them.
The site permits download managers (I use IDM) and I had no issue with links timing out. One issue that I did experience is that the download speeds could fluctuate. With IDM I’m used to seeing downloads near 7MB/s on most sites. With this site there were times when I could see those speeds but those times weren’t frequent or sustained. I could regularly see speeds well below 2MB/s. On average, I’d say that I got 4 to 4.5MB/s. Still not bad, but less than I normally get. The slower speeds also seemed to correspond with peak download times in Eastern Europe so I could often improve my downloads by waiting until those members were less likely to be downloading porn.
The site appears to be still active though updates are now infrequent. There was an update on November 24, 2012 but the next most recent was in April. As recently as March 2012 they were adding four or five scenes per month.
One factor that some potential members may be interested to know (and it could be a pro or a con depending on your preferences) is that while there are a good proportion of anal scenes on the other sites in the network, Tricky Masseur has no anal scenes.
The bottom line is that this is a pretty good massage site. The models are incredibly beautiful, young and petite and make for some great porn. If you like massage porn I’d recommend giving the site a try and as an added bonus you get access to a huge network and you get a TBP / PU discount too.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Easy login. Username and password. No captcha.
-Epoch is the billing company.
-You get a confirming email on signup. Which is starting to get rare, for some reason. At least some of the sites I've joined in the last year, I've gotten no confirming email. How much does it cost to send an email? But why bother, since if the customer forgets his username or password, or has some problem about cancelling his membership, that's his problem, and in the meantime, the site can continue charging him for his membership.
-I'm seeing so many lovely young models at many different networks/sites. And this network has some truly gorgeous young models.
-Default viewing option. Select your favorite viewing option on how to view a scene, and the site will remember it. Not sure how useful this is, seems more like a gimmick than anything useful.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Download manager works. I use DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
Cons:
PROS (continued):
-Membership price recently reduced to $17.87/month. I'm not sure how long that price reduction will last.
-Videos have the date they were posted to the site.
==============
CONS:
-Pre-checked offer at signup has to be unchecked, or you will have a $1.00 1-day trial membership to some site, that automatically renews at $38.57/month. So if you miss the pre-checked offer, you will be paying $38.57/month until you figure out what's happening.
-Get thumbnails advertising other sites on the member's pages. If you paid to get inside, do you need this advertising thrown at you? But many sites are doing it.
-Large watermark bottom right side of videos.
-Small site. Only has 20 videos so far.
-19 of the 20 videos were previously posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network). There was one video at Rub A Teen that I did not match up. But that's probably because I didn't want to spend the time going through each video at Tricky Masseur.
Bottom Line:
If you've been a member of Teen Mega World in the last 6 months, and you examined the Tricky Masseur site of that network, then you've probably seen all or almost all of the videos that are at Rub A Teen.
The Rub A Teen site offers more choices in the video definition than the Tricky Masseur site. For the videos that are at both sites, Tricky Masseur offers a low, medium and high definiton download. Rub A Teen goes one better: a low, medium and high definition, and a higher definition. (The high definition is 720p, the higher definition is 1080p.)
The Tricky Masseur site often has subtitles to go with the foreign language the actors/models speak. The Rub A Teen site videos do not have the subtitles. But once you have read the subtitles, you realize the words have little meaning, so the absence of subtitles is not a problem, because what the actors/models are saying is basically just noise. Teen Mega World is a huge network, with a lot of great-looking models, and a lot of hot hardcore videos. It's certainly worth joining the network at least once, to look through their tremendous archive of hardcore videos. Tricky Masseur has 93 videos. It's basically an archive site, having added only 1 new video in the last 7 months.
The Rub A Teen site has 20 videos total. 19 of the videos were already posted at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).
The difference in file size between the 1080p version and the 720p version is huge:
For example, for a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 30 seconds (the Laura video):
Rub A Teen Laura video:
The 1080p MP4 file size is 2.08 GB.
The 720p MP4 file size is 1.05 GB.
Tricky Masseur Laura video:
No 1080p version is offered.
The 720p file size is 999 MB.
How many people are going to spend 2 GB per video of hard drive space?
Most of the videos are between 25 to 30 minutes in runtime.
So if you are going to keep the 1080p version on your hard drive, you are allocating around 2 GB per video. And if you are a collector of videos, you will be buying lots of hard drive capacity to store these huge video files.
Actually, I don't know why the file sizes at Rub A Teen are so large.
At Diesel network, for instance, they give you 1080p video for a 30 minute runtime, and the file size is 686 MB. That compares to 2.08 GB at Rub A Teen.
Comparing the bit rate of the 720p files (of the same video): Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 5134 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second Tricky Masseur Total bitrate = 4736 kbps Frame rate = 25 frames/second
Comparing the bit rate of a 1080p video, with a completely different 1080p video: Rub A Teen Total bitrate = 10136 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second
Diesel site Total bitrate = 3199 kbps Frame rate = 29 frames/second
To increase the bit rate by a factor of 3.2, you are increasing the file size from 686 MB to 2.08 GB.
I don't know how these technical details play out. But as far as I can tell, you can't really tell the difference on a computer monitor that is 20+ inches in size between the 3199 kbps and 10136 kbps files.
Maybe on a large-screen TV monitor, you can tell the difference. But you are going to be spending hundreds of dollars on hard drives, as cheap as they are today, if you are going to collect videos that are 2GB in size.
If you enjoy the erotic massage niche, then I suggest signing up with the Teen Mega World network, where you get one site (Tricky Masseur) that focuses on that area, with 93 videos. Plus you get over 20 other hardcore sites that are mainly boy-girl sex, some solo vids, some lesbian vids.
Basically, I think it makes little commercial sense to build a site that is a clone of a competitor's site. But I guess that the owners of Rub A Teen decided that the erotic massage niche was popular, and this is what they came up with as an inexpensive way to do it, because they are just buying/leasing some of the same videos that Tricky Masseur bought/leased.
For people who don't know about Tricky Masseur, then the Rub A Teen site can be a nice introduction to the erotic massage niche.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-High Quality Pictures
-Pictures Sets Contained in Downloadable in Zip Files
-Fair Amount of Bonus Material from Other Sites
Cons:
-Low Quality Videos
-Very Few Pictures Available
-Very Few Videos Available
-Badly Organized Website
-Unsavory/Deceptive Business Practices
Bottom Line:
Don't be fooled by the initial splash screen!! You will scroll down to see a bunch of girls, mainly high school cheerleaders named "Candice," "Allison," "Emily", etc, which appear to link to content on this site which you can access only if you are a member.
However, these particular girls are not anywhere to be found on this site... What's on the site are a grand total of 784 pics (as of 11/30/12), all pics are actually of college cheerleaders, and all of these pics appear to be lifted straight out of the public domain (Internet scouring/newsgroups).
784 may sound like a lot, but this site has been running for years, and I know there are cheerleader newsgroups which post 60-100 pics per post, per day. And this site says that it is "the largest collection of teen cheerleaders on the net." You have got to be joking.
Also, there are a grand total of 24 cheerleader videos for download, the majority of them are grainy/blurry (even in the best formats), jittery camera, and a fair number of these are videos of asian/thai/japanese cheerleaders.
As for their business practices--BAD. When you first sign up, they automatically check certain checkboxes for you, essentially stating you want to sign up extra features where you will be billed in a recurring fashion. It's off to the right in small letters, if you aren't paying attention you will find that you accidentally signed up and will be hit with "surprise" charges.
After that, they try the same trick again to get you to agree to a free four day pass, (and in a small asterisk to the side--after which you will be billed $39.95 recurring). Brazenly, the website even states this is "for your convenience." If you unwittingly agree you will get hit with more recurring charges.
Also, the datestamp of the updates appears to be algorithmically generated (i.e., it is a "lie" to make you think they are still updating this website). I saw one set of pics that actually stated it was posted 12-01-12. Problem: That's actually tomorrow. And it was too early west-coast time to be explained by time zone differences.
The organization of the website is also pretty bad. Nobody tells you pictures appear after the vids in the result set. And rather than the content being tailored just for Teenie Cheerleader, which is what you paid for, the home page is more like a portal to all the other websites you didn't really sign up for, but came with your membership. A minor consolation is the drop down filter at the upper right.
At the end of the day, you're frustrated that they tried to swindle you out of money right out of the starting gate, the content that appeared on the splashscreen wasn't actually there after you signed up, the content that was there (pictures)...even though it was high quality, it really wasn't much in the way of quantity and you could probably get the same content for free on Internet newsgroups. And the video quality was so bad, the 24 vids aren't even worth downloading.
So what do you think? Ready to sign up for it now?
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Part of the Naughty America Network which includes over 25 sites
- About 150 shoots in this site, more than 5,050 across the network.
- Aggressive update schedule. This site updates 2-3 times a month, and within the network there's usually 2-3 updates EVERYDAY.
- Navigation is awesome. It's easy to find what you're looking for or case a wide net for a serendipitous adventure.
- The preview section is generous enough to let you know what you'll get as a member without giving away the farm
- 1080p available. Anything from post mid-2007 is in "DVD Quality". And anything older than that is decent 480 2k quality (good for the time it was shot)
- pix are available in zip format - over 150 pix per shoot.
- .wmv and .mp4 formats available.
- 5 minute preview available to let you know if the whole scene is worth it for you or not. It's nice as a highlight roll
Cons:
- My biggest complaint is they discontinued the live shows that they did a few years ago. There now available as achieves, but it's not the same
- With each log in you have to go past annoying full screen ads.
- de-select sign up cross sales :(
- most girls have implants (no problem for me but I know some object).
- Almost ever shoot ends in a facial. Nice to see more variety instead.
Bottom Line:
This site has a fun premise and enough lee-way to mix up the scenes. The talent is top totch and the directors have been better in the more recent shoots (within the last 10 months or so)
They routinely offer discounts and there's so much here you really can't go wrong. If you've never been a member you should check them out. If you have been a member, not much has changed, maybe look to see if some of you favorites have done shoots. It may be with a discount membership to pick up some of the girls you really like.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
