Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Cams
Many Girls available
speaking English
Euro teens
non Pros , mostly Amateur Girls (Girl from the neighbourhood) Teen Girls
Cons:
recognized the site first time in 2002.
i got a member there in 2007 first time.
Before, after u pay to renter the site (something under 20 €)u got a lot in free chat, many girls online doing shows, u didnt need to pay more. 24 hours a day.Just the cam quality was a bit poor.
In 2008, they changed the layout of the site, also they changed that girls just talk in freechat, for more you need to pay more now in private rooms.
So if you want to join the site in his sense, it will be an expensive matter.
Also a lot of good, sexy long-established girls left the site, and the new girls doesnt have the qualitiy in their shows.
that change is a reason for me, not to join this site anymore.
If they will go back to the style it was before 2008, i immediatley would go back there.
Bottom Line:
Clubseventeen (Seventeenlive)is worship, but in that
hustler style, thi site is not worth it to register at.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
HD Cams
Many Girls available
speaking English
Euro teens
non Pros , mostly Amateur Girls (Girl from the neighbourhood) Teen Girls
Cons:
I recognized the site first time in 2002.
i got a member there in 2007 first time.
Before, after u pay to renter the site (something under 20 €)u got a lot in free chat, many girls online doing shows, u didnt need to pay more. 24 hours a day.Just the cam quality was a bit poor.
In 2008, they changed the layout of the site, also they changed that girls just talk in freechat, for more you need to pay more now in private rooms.
So if you want to join the site in his sense, it will be an expensive matter.
Also a lot of good, sexy long-established girls left the site, and the new girls doesnt have the qualitiy in their shows.
that change is a reason for me, not to join this site anymore.
If they will go back to the style it was before 2008, i immediatley would go back there.
Bottom Line:
Clubseventeen (Seventeenlive)is worship, but in that
hustler style, thi site is not worth it to register at.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models ON EARTH!
Spectacular imagery and sets
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Good navigation
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
obnoxious cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
One minor annoyance: The user defined keywords are not particularly useful.
Bottom Line:
This is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period. Navigation is also very good.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. FOr example: Mila, with 44 sets, always looks like she is enjoying herself. Fergie, with only 16 sets, is a little more conservative but can melt ice with her looks. Wait...loking at the site while writing a review can be very distracting....
OK, there is rally only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. It seems that Met Art is now part of a network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives and Erotic Beauty. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each oif these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the owners want to maximize revenue. I can even appreciate that some owner/photographers hire a model for a day or a weekend trip, shoot many, many sets and then break the sets up over multiple sites, again, to maximize revenie (Met-Art and Met-Models, now Erotic Beauty, comes to mind) What I find offensive is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model supposedly exist. It is one thing to list other sites on the model page, but it is simply obnoxious baiting to put a clickable image of the model at the bottom of the page and only include a small reference to the name of the other site. This is the only site I've ever seen that uses this relatively deceptive practice and I absolutely hate it. (Can you tell?)
Now, in-spite of that trashy cross-selling tactic, the guys at met-art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join one. And, to be fair, these sites appear to have plenty of unique sets spread around to each of the sites.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I come back every year and will probably succomb to the cross-selling and try one or more of the other sites...and will review them when I do, of course!
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A huge site with an archive going back 10 years featuring 792 models in 9900+ photo sets (almost 1.2 million images) and 2300+ videos.
A huge array of outfits, costumes, lingerie, leg and footwear.
Exclusive content
Bonus sites Only Carla and Only Melanie included.
Photos in choice of 3 sizes, 711 x 1066, 1365 x 2048 and 2000 x 3000px
Zip download for each size.
Video download options are HD 1280 x 720 and High Res 640 x 360 wmv, HD and High Res streaming options plus an m4v download for ipod.
At least 3 updates every day of the week, some days can be up to 6.
All content date stamped right back to 2002.
All file sizes shown and video run times.
No apparent download limits.
Customizable browse options and excellent search engine.
10 free Fast Track credits provided allowing you to view forthcoming releases of your choice before they are officially released.
Choice of Epoch or CCBill for credit card payments.
Cons:
The site is very softcore, any nudity is fairly tame and many models don’t go any further than just topless, some not even that far.
Some repetition of outfits and shoot locations.
Oldest videos poor quality.
Videos quite short averaging 5-6 minutes.
If you prefer your HD videos in a format other than wmv you will be disappointed.
The most irritating thing for me were the zip downloads of the older photo sets (released up until about 2008 I think), after downloading and extracting the zips you have to click your way through 7-8 folders before arriving at the photos, really annoying.
Poor file naming, seemingly random meaningless numbers and letters so renaming required.
Ads in member’s area
Minimum 4 months subscription required to access “VIP member’s area”
Regional pricing with both CCBill and Epoch.
Bottom Line:
For anyone considering a membership at Only Tease the main thing to consider is that it is a very softcore site containing very little explicit nudity. The site is all about the clothing, costumes, lingerie and hosiery being worn by the models, teasing and tantalising you with that flash of stocking top or suspender belt, catching a glimpse of their panties up their short skirts or a view of their cleavage down that tight blouse before she slowly removes the items of clothing one by one. You will find almost every type of outfit you could possibly think of from casual wear to business suits, glamorous evening gowns to clubbing wear, various uniforms like college girl, cheerleader, nurse, French maid to sports outfits and even some fictional characters such as Snow White and Alice in wonderland.
Amongst the near 800 models you will find some well known US and Euro models but what I really liked was the amazing collection of British models. Despite being from the UK I don’t buy magazines or patronise the sleazy tabloid press so most of these page three models were completely unknown to me. I was planning to just stick around for 1 month and try to be selective about what I downloaded but there are so many gorgeous models I found it almost impossible to deny most of them space on my hard drive so as a result I’m already well in to my 2nd month. Some of the more popular models have a huge amount of content, in some cases well over a hundred updates, almost like having several solo sites within the site. I loved the collection of Hayley-Marie here with a whopping 171 updates. Bryoni-Kate was another favourite of mine with 90 updates.
With such a huge amount of content you need to be able to navigate around it easily and they do provide plenty of browse and search tools. You can browse either photos or videos by a month and year listing or use the A-Z model index. They also have an excellent search engine allowing you to search for any type of outfit with several filters to refine your search. For example a basic search for “miniskirt” will bring up over 4000 results and you can then narrow your search by adding various filters such as the type and colour of stockings, tights or socks you want to go with it and also the type of lingerie required and then add in some model criteria like hair colour and breast size and whether you require nudity or just topless.
In addition they also have several features in the browse options like “behind the scenes”, “model of the year” and “model of the month”. There’s also a “prestige tease” section where you will find some of the top name models in slightly more glam and photo shopped galleries than the regular OT galleries although they’ve not updated that section since May of this year. There’s also a feature called “Tease at Home” which allegedly features the model being shot in her own home and being allowed to choose her own outfits. You also have the ability to rate the models, outfits and tease factor of every shoot and they have “Top lists” showing the highest rated in each category. Other extras include Wallpapers and there’s a very active forum where members can discuss models and outfits.
I’m not particularly interested in the videos, I did however find the videos here slightly more interesting than those on their sister site Art-Lingerie that I reviewed recently mainly because the videos here start fully clothed so you at least have a bit of anticipation and build up with some teasing and a striptease. They did however suffer from the same flaws IMO, having that awkward silence again with no back ground music and rarely any chat from the model apart from a brief introduction at the start. I just find it really irritating and amateurish when you can hear every little background noise. Some models do have separate interview videos where they talk about themselves…yawn….boring.
In addition to the regular daily updates, every Tuesday and Thursday they add an additional update which is designated as a “VIP Members” update. Clicking on these tells me I am not eligible to view them until the 1st day of my 4th month of membership so clearly these extra updates are designed to try and incentivize members to stick around longer and spend more money. The VIP updates look to have started around September 2011 so you’d be looking at around an extra 90 updates if you stick around long enough. I’m not sure these extra updates are enough incentive for me to stick around, after nearly 2 months of softcore teasing I’m ready to move on for some naked pussy. A highly recommended site though if you love softcore stripping, teasing, stockings and lingerie as I do.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
There are no DRM, download limits, regional discrimination, pre checked cross sells, or dirty tricks.
Beautiful girls.
Some very orginal and erotic poses.
Good lighting and overall sense of professionalism.
Good quality videos.
Zipped photos.
Easy log in.
Still updating.
Cons:
Same style and angles every time resulting in a mass produced look.
The picture sets contain too many of the same pose and have little continuity.
Very little ethnic, age, or shape diversity. Models are mainly thin, white, and young.
Few picture or download options. Top quality video is now mp4, not wmv. You have to drop lower in quality to obtain wmv.
Navigation not the best.
No teasing or build up in the pics or videos.
Occasionally annoying male leads.
Although you get some bonus sites, it is a relatively small network.
Bottom Line:
Video Downloads - Best Quality 1280x720 at 4000kbps (4838), High Quality 800x452 at 2500 kbps, Normal Quality 580x328 at 1000 kbps. Recently, for some reason, they changed their "Best Quality" downloads from wmv to mp4. The 4000 kbps wmv is now unavailable, and has been changed to 4500 kbps mp4, so if you want wmv, you have to download a lower quality video.
Pics, and sometimes videos, are ridiculously frustrating because although they choose some original and erotic angles to shoot from, they continually miss out the lower legs and feet, and concentrate far too much on the groin, ass, and upper thigh, turning the models into amputees. I have seen criticism elsewhere on PU, concerning the gynaecological focus of their shoots. A great shame because the models are fantastic, and they think up some original angles to shoot from, then they undermine this eroticism by turning the models into amputees 80 per cent of the time. It is particularly annoying in the pics, where it would appear, feet do not exist.
Although they have great and original angles and ways of shooting models, that mould is set, and they rarely stray from doing exactly the same thing on each shoot, making everything look mass produced.
The pics are adequate but a lot of the time there is little continuity or thought put into the sets. You see a girl starting with clothes, but you don't see much of the strip or lead up to sex. It is like watching six frames from a video, forward winding for four minutes, then watching another six frames, then forward winding, and so on. There are four to eight almost identical pictures of a model in one pose, then four to eight in another pose, with little idea of continuity or progression in the shoot.
Sometimes the male leads can be very irritating. Whether this is by direction or not I don't know. Some continually slap the asses of the models, grunt, groan, and paw their female co workers like they were terrorists abusing their hostages. That can be unerotic for some of us.
Okay, let's be honest, let's come out of the closet. Female genitalia just by itself isn't all that attractive, neither is chopped liver, or any type of roadkill. It is what leads up to that genitalia that is attractive. The whole package, the eyes, the face, the breasts, the legs, the everything. It's the genitalia in context, along with the whole package. I so wish some of these sites would realise that. We've got past the shock of penetration about 40 years ago in Europe, 30 years ago in America, amd 10 years ago in Britain. So we don't need closeups of two thrusting groins and nothing else. We know they're having sex, we get to see it all the time.
I know sites have to keep production costs as cheap as possible, but surely it's possible to see two whole people having sex, and give us some idea of the beauty of the whole girl. It's done professionally, but with little love for the subject. This is true of 99% of porn, both today and in the past so I can't complain too much.
Their visitors preview site probably gives a better preview of what's on offer than the members' home page as there you get a better idea of how the girls look, and what the sets are like.
It may just me being stupid again but once I got into browsing a picture set, I couldn't get back to home again without going through my favourites option.
There is a model search option from the home page (in very small print), but when you access the model using this, the video and picture download options are dead links. You therefore have to look at the date, then go back to the home pages and work out where the model is on the chronologically listed update pages in order to download pics and videos.
It seems there is a six simultaneous downloads limit.
Logging in is easy, and you can return to the site without re entering your password.
The lighting, production and photography are mainly very good. If you go back to the first few girls recorded in 2009 you can see how much this has improved. The early ones look very different, with a different style, angles, and lighting.
You would think by the title of "First Anal Quest" its close relative "Double View Casting," and the comments "real teenagers craving to get their cherries popped," and "no fake scenes no bullshit," these are mostly first timers, but not a bit of it. Some of these girls (for example Britney, Stonell, and Kristina) have been around for a long long time, and have appeared on many other sites featuring Eastern European Girls. Some of these girls have pussies more pounded than when a juggernaut lorry crashed into the local Pets At Home.
All in all it is worth a visit, but very few seasoned downloaders will find any need to stay more than a month, or maybe two.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Top-of-the-Pops in solo girls videos (only solo girls)
+ Exclusive content
+ Vast amount of material – vids and pix sets
+ Several different scenes of the same girl for the major part of models
+ Fine, great video quality – among others: top MP4.
+ Most of older vids are now reedited to up-to-date quality, nice!
+ Daily updates – one day video, next pics ect.
+ Several download options
+ Great download speed - mostly
+ No DRM, no download limits.
+ Zip for pics
+ Easy navigation/download – except update browsing
+ Nice price – except: see below
Cons:
- Regional pricing
- Somewhat repetitive style in video scenes - but what exclusive site does not have that.
- A bit troublesome update-search (see below)
- A little too much going for outdoor scenes
- Confusing model names
- Poor preview (see below)
Bottom Line:
In Focus Girls is probably the best solo-girl-video-site, I've joined for a long, long time. It reminds me a bit of the enthusiasm, I had when first joining the DDF, 1 By Day several years ago.
This site offers a vast amount (1300) of great videos of especially euro girls – the majority well known from other sites. But here you get exclusive scenes, exclusive shots.....oh, yes – some, a few of these scenes are placed elsewhere – but to my knowledge from this site.
And the best deal is, that most – far most – of the girls/models – have more than one scene. Most/some two or three, some even up to 12 different video scenes with the same model – that's really a collectors item.
And the older videos for those well known , favorite models have now been re-edited:
So you get vids from 2006/2007/2008 in fine, fine quality, too. Still a few, very few (2005) are not updated and in low quality.
The navigation is mostly very easy – especially when browsing models – the name, akas are confusing, though. Only about half are using a well know name...so if you want to browse for your favorites, you'll have problems – still they all have fine, big thumbs, so......
The video downloads are in 5 choices:
Four in the fine MP4 (my favorite):
1280x720 - 4Mbit
854x480 - 2Mbit
640x360 - 964Kbit
480x272 - 664Kbit
In PSP
And MPG in parts
And – you get 4 streaming options, too.
At the moment there is almost 1300 videos here – a lot of nice browsing and downloading.
Generally I get a very fine download speed here – 1700-2000 Kb/sec – sometimes (rarely) it's somewhat slower.
It's a little annoying browsing updates: It now goes in pages from 1-108...and if you what like page 66 – you got to have patience clicking and clicking..
The models browsing is much easier: Alphabetic.
Preview: It's miserable and not informative – Strange with such a fine site, so do not let it fool you
Not much into pics – but you get three seizes – and of course zip – best is:
2000x1333.
I hate that regional pricing, but overcame my principals here – and joined – and happy, I did.
This is truly a great site...and seems like the best around when it come to fine looking solo girls. Highly recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ The same great fresh teen girls that we all know and love from other TeenCoreClub sites but now in 1080P full HD!!!
+ Young newbies, hard anal sex. For me that's a winning combination
+ Great professionally shot video with super vibrant colors at WMV 1920x1080 @ ~7Mbps
+ All videos come with a matching photo set containing on average 450 pictures at 1280x853.
+ Good download speeds, using a download manager with 4 channels mean I can download videos at ~25mbps
+ Videos can be downloaded as clips in high or low quality or as a full scene in high quality.
+ No DRM
+ No regional pricing
Cons:
- Only 11 scenes
- Dont be surprised if the combined number of updates across all sites included in the membership is only a 1-2 per month
- Full scenes can only be downloaded in full HD which means a 1.5GB download. Not ideal for those on slow connections or those who dont care about HD
- Very, very basic interface. No model list, no search, no streaming. Just page after page of videos.
- No network interface, you have to log into each site individually
- Updates are not dated
- No zip file download option for pictures
Bottom Line:
Although this site launched around 4 months ago I put my soft spot for Teen Core Club aside as the last time I jumped on a new site (Defiled18.com) I was stung by the lack of updates. So I waited until now to join and guess what? I have been stung by the lack of updates.
Pat's great review is almost 2 months old and he states there were 10 videos available, which I think is the number the site launched with. The number of updates today? 11. Thats right, they have done it again, launched a new and interesting site and completely destroyed any chance of keeping long term members by failing to support it. A site that receives one update over a 4 month period is a disgrace. Defiled18.com did the same, launched with 10 episodes just over a year ago and today have only 16. Going by those numbers, on these new sites we get 1 update every 2 months.
While a membership here also gives access to TryTeens.com, WhiteTeensBlackCocks.com and Defiled18.com, which are the only TeenCoreClub sites that still update, they make it so difficult to get at whats new due to the fact you have to log in to each site individually. I really don't understand why they want to make it so obtuse for a paying customer to get their stuff.
Bottom line, my patience for this lot is almost at its end. I think I will have to go over to Teen Mega World for my Russian newbe fix or maybe even try out the newly resurected No Rest Network. When the owners of the site dont seem to give a crap about the quality of their product I dont think I should be supporting them anymore.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
*1100 teen (18+) models (no silicone), 5700 photo sets (100 ish pics each), 600,000 photos, 5700 videos (10 to 15min). -100% exclusive.
*Many attractive models and lots of total stunners, especially in video.
*Updates every day. 3 new models per week. All model's content on consecutive days. Not dragged out over months. I wish all sites would do this.
*4 softcore photo sets and videos per model plus some bg and gg hardcore.
*Photosets in 1200x800 and 2400x1600 with full zips.
*Videos in WMV 1280x720 3600kb/s approx 400MB, MP4 854x480 1500kb/s, plus some lower resolutions and mobile and streaming. No DRM. Samples of all types available in tour.
*Sample of every video and photoset on site available in tour.
*Good model directory and exemplary search facility.
*Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
*Download manager friendly. No download limit. No timeouts.
*Choose CCBill or Epoch.
Cons:
* Too much emphasis on toys and masturbation. Even if you like this in videos, photos would benefit from less. If you hit on these themes, this is not a con.
*Photos less good than videos but still better than most sites which offer good video.
*Few repeat visits from models. Very few deviate from the 4 solo photo + 4 solo vid + bg/gg plan.
*Hardly any non-Caucasian or non-slim. I prefer slim Caucasian so this suits me but might not suit everyone.
*"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central. This applies to virtually all sites unless they are specialist fetish sites. Not a con for me.
*Slight discrepancy between what tour quotes for number of sets and videos and what search feature reveals. Figures quoted in pros might not be exact but not far off.
Bottom Line:
I have given this site a very high score even though much of its content is not what I want or like. I believe that a score should be based on how well a site delivers what its free tour leads you to expect. An inadequate or misleading tour should detract from the score even when content is good. Excellent delivery following an informative tour should be rewarded.
Nubiles has one of the very best tours around: so good that not everyone might be aware of this. It has access to the full model directory. Click any model and you see exactly what her content is plus two full size pictures and a sample of her video at every resolution and format choice the site offers. If you click "Photos", every set has three free images at 1200x800 and 12 representative thumbs. And every video has a 1 minute streaming sample at a quality good enough to view full screen.
The tour area is the same as the members area but without the actual content. So, when you join, you should be in no doubt what the site has to offer in navigation and content. This is teen girls in mainly solo videos and photo sets with some bg and somewhat less gg. Many of the girls, of course, appear on other sites, including ATK, Femjoy, Karups, MetArt, Twistys and others but the Nubiles content is 100% exclusive. Girls often look younger on Nubiles, even when they were shot later than other sites. This, I believe, is mainly due to subtle makeup and lighting since Nubiles deplores and discourages things like pigtails or holding teddy bears.
You would need to study the tour very carefully, however, to reveal what are the greatest frustrations of the site for me. It has a very strong emphasis on toys and masturbation; and it is geared towards video rather than photos even though it takes a standard 4 solo photo sets and 4 solo videos per model. gg or bg is on top of that.
The webmaster makes his comprehensive instructions to photographers available in the tour. There are some contradictions and ambiguities in it and clarifying those would help the site and its members. Here are a few quotes:
"Videos are just important as pictures." [sic]
"video is more important to members then pictures." [sic]
"At least half of the sets should be fingering and finger masturbation without toys."
"Our favorite content is when a girl plays with toys."
"The best theme is just masturbation and toys, and I dont expect other themes but here are a few ideas." [sic]
"Members do not like toys as they often get in the way of seeing what she is doing down there. Do not give me 4 sets of all toys! "
"No more then 2 sets with toys. Focus on finger masturbation." [sic]
I have joined the site many times (despite my loathing of toys and masturbation content). Using its excellent search feature confirms that the toys and masturbation bias has increased over the past year. I deplore this but some might enjoy it. For me, toys and fingers both get in the way. I wish the webmaster would clarify his intention and ensure that it is clearly described in his instructions to photographers.
The photo sets are genuine photos, not vidcaps. But the webmaster requires that they should mirror the videos. This tends to result in each photo set rather closely being a kind of rehearsal for the video, with less spontaneity and engagement. They are often less well lit, colour balanced and focused than the videos and frequently less good than the same model's photo content on other sites.
I think it would improve the site's content if photos could be freed of the constraint to match the videos. Why not have the toys and masturbation in the videos, where they add interest, and keep them out of the photos, in which they are mainly an obstruction to the view and always look unnatural? That said, the site does have some excellent photo sets too, and some girls have all their photo sets free of toys and even of masturbation. But they are not the norm.
The videos are almost invariably better than elsewhere. Video is technically excellent. 1280x720 wmv is very sharp to view and well lit.
I mentioned the search feature. It is superb. You can search on 15 Attributes (inc boobs, pussy etc), 15 Outfits (inc lingerie, glasses etc), 9 Actions (inc toys, hardcore) and Actions can EXCLUDE too, so I can find photo sets without toys! You can access and even run the live search feature in the tour. WYSIWYG!!!
All photo sets and videos start clothed, even if frequently this just means a bikini or bra and panties, and get fully nude partway through. None start out nude. There is some teasing but probably not enough to satisfy lingerie or tease enthusiasts. It is not a fetish site; the emphasis is on the girls and most of them are hot.
Despite its missing the mark for me, I frequently rejoin. I recommend Nubiles to anyone who enjoys quality teen content, especially if you like toys and masturbation and are aware that, though no slouch in photos or hardcore, its strength lies in its solo video.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
NOTE: I joined this site for the hardcore videos. I'm not a softcore guy or a photo guy, so I'm writing this review from the perspective of a guy looking for hardcore video scenes.
- A lot of hot girls. If you are familiar with the slender, tight look of European porn girls, then you will know the type of girls they feature. Many of the well known European porn girls can be found here...but this may be a bad thing if you're tired of seeing the same European girls from other sites.
- Very functional site design with all of the features you would hope to find on a modern porn site (streaming for each scene, nice search options, clean attractive layout).
- Downloadable files are offered in a nice variety of sizes and the video quality of the downloadable files is quite good.
- Fairly frequent updates...however, there is a problem with the updates, which I will cover in the "cons" below.
Cons:
- There can be frustrating camera work (too many closeups and odd camera angle choices that prevent you from seeing the girl or the action).
- Not many hardcore scenes...a large portion of the scenes are softcore masturbation vids.
- They update with new content often, but the problem is that many of the updates are just a photo set with no corresponding video. I have read that Diesel Media often posts the video on their other site Young Legal Porn. This seems like an attempt to get people to subscribe to their other site in order to access the video that goes with the photo set.
- I joined this site hoping to see more "artsy" filming style advertised in the tour, but upon joining I found that many of the hardcore scenes did not have this style. Many of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com have a VERY similar look to other sites like Teen Mega World, Euro Teen Movs, and First Anal Quest - Same male actors, same girls, same camera work, etc.
Bottom Line:
The hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com come in 2 filming styles: "artsy" and "traditional". The "artsy" scenes are filmed by 2 directors named Ray Man and Dirk Milton, while the more traditional style porn scenes are filmed by a director named Anton Rusakov.
If you check out the tour, it is clear that 18onlygirls.com advertises itself as an "artsy" site with professional, high-end camera work...but once you join you find that only a portion of their hardcore scenes feature this type of camera work. Once inside, you realize that a lot of the hardcore scenes on 18onlygirls.com are more traditional and appear to come from the same people who film scenes for other European sites like Teen Mega World and First Anal Quest - I can't confirm this, but the scenes look VERY similar to other Euro sites. On 18onlygirls.com, the director of these more "traditional" porn scenes goes by the name of Anton Rusakov. If you're at all familiar with European porn sites, you can instantly recognize the same camera work, same lighting, similar sets, and same males actors from the other European porn sites. I'm starting to wonder if all of the various European sites have their scenes filmed by the same people, then they just lease the content out. At this point I have joined a few different Euro porn networks, and most of these sites look like their scenes come from the same director and crew (scenes on 18onlygirls.com, firstanalquest.com, euroteenmovs.com, & Teen Mega World all look EXTREMELY similar). Many times I have seen the same scene duplicated on completely different European networks. One of the only Euro networks that seems to have their own unique filming style is the Teen Core Club Network.
So, if you have joined some of the popular European porn sites before, the Anton Rusakov scenes will look very familiar. I wouldn't have a problem with all of these European sites looking the same if the camera work were better. Most of these Euro sites suffer from the same frustrating camera angles. If you have read my reviews before, you know that I place a very high importance on camera angles. Camera angles are the most important part of any porn scene, because the camera angles determine if you can clearly see the sex and the girl's body...and I think we can all agree that the reason we watch porn is to see sex and girls' bodies. There's nothing worse than clicking on a new porn scene with anticipation only to be disappointed when the camera man spends large portions of the scene zooming in on just the girl's crotch and stomach, or just focuses on her ass. Then there's the dreaded face closeup. Seriously - what is the point of zooming in on a girl's face in a porn scene? I can see a girls face any time I want by just walking outside of my house. When a naked girl is having sex, I WANT TO SEE HER BODY, NOT JUST HER FACE! Why can't they zoom the camera out to show me her body AND her face at the same time? For some reason most camera men in porn still haven't figured this out. I wish all porn producers would eliminate face closeups completely. Another thing that bothers me is when a girl gives a blowjob, the camera man always feels to need to zoom in on girl's face - why not zoom out and use this opportunity to show off the girls body as she gives the blowjob? (the only site I have seen that zooms out during blowjobs is tryteens.com, so I applaud them for that). So there is some annoying camera work in the Anton Rusakov scenes. Most of these scenes are decent, but not great. There are a few gems, however, where they really nail the camera work.
So I had some frustration with traditional style "Anton Rusakov" scenes, but I found that the "artsy" scenes were actually more frustrating. The solo scenes and "artsy" hardcore scenes are filmed by 2 directors who go by the names Ray Man and Dirk Milton. I was very disappointed by the camera angles in these scenes. The film quality and lighting were excellent, but the annoying camera angles made these "artcore" scenes virtually unwatchable. I found that in these artcore scenes the camera would always be zoomed in and only focused on one part of the girl's body...so you rarely got a good view of the girl's entire figure. This was maddening to me - here you have these beautiful naked girls and they're only showing you her legs or her stomach. What the? In the artsy style hardcore scenes, the camera would often just take a side view and zoom in on just the 2 pelvises of the actors...no view of the penetration and no view of the girl's body. Ugh. You can have all expensive cameras in the world, but if you don't show the viewer what they want to see you are wasting megabytes on these scenes.
There are some decent Anton Rusakov scenes to be found here which are filmed in a more traditional style found on other European sites...but the "high-end" solo scenes and artsy hardcore scenes are almost unwatchable due to the frustrating camera work and baffling camera angles
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
high quality content
deliver what they promise
unike pictures in my opiniom
large gallery, many many hours if you will go through everything.
very satisfied
Cons:
You should have the ability to create favorite photo album.
Bottom Line:
Very good site that provides very good content. Well worth the money.
My account was hacked, and the hackers used my account to become members of all the pages in their network. They also used money from my account on the web camera shows. Met-Art were very helpfull, and I've got all my money back. The handeld this very professional.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Huge collection dating back five years
- One of the few sites available that photo fans and video fans can both enjoy
- Standard-setting production values
- Site has a ‘personal’ feel thanks to the models and staff
- Site is simple, but user-friendly
- Exclusive content (not found elsewhere)
- Unique content (nothing else like it on the ‘net)
- Bills through CC Bill
- Excellent value
- Allows download managers with no obvious timeouts
- Offers HD in multiple formats
Cons:
- None. Seriously, none.
Bottom Line:
ALS Scan is a site that I shouldn’t like because I generally have little interest in solo girl, masturbation scenes and girl-girl scenes. But even though that’s all that ALS Scan offers, the site is certainly in my top-five favourite sites and a site that I go back to regularly.
I won’t go into a lot of detail about the technical specs of the site because those have been addressed before by me and others in earlier reviews. The site continues to offer HD video in both MP4 and WMV. I didn’t bother to comment on that in a previous review because I didn’t realize how rare that is. Due to size restrictions, many sites only offer HD in MP4 format and leave those of us who still prefer WMV to live with a lower-resolution file or go with MP4. This would appear to show the level of customer support that the site has if they take this extra step to keep a few of us happy.
I’ve said before that for me to really like a site it has to excel at three things: 1) the content has to be good, 2) the site design needs to be effective and user-friendly, and 3) the material needs to be easily accessed by the members either by streaming or download. A lot of sites score high on two of those, but few score high on all three of those. ALS is one of the sites that does well on all three. They certainly knock two of them out of the park and do better than average on another.
First the content: like any site, if you don’t like the content you’re not going to like the site regardless of how great the technical aspects are. In this respect prospective members really need to know that ALS Scan isn’t a ‘normal’ porn site. There is no hardcore b/g here at all. There’s no b/g stuff period. There is mostly solo and g/g material. If you’re not into that, the site might seem a bit dull, but they add some unique character by having lots of behind-the-scenes stuff too. I call it BTS, but only because I can’t think of a better term for it. Some people don’t like this, but some like me do, and that’s having the camera rolling during a photo shoot. I’m not sure why I like it, but I do and this stuff is very well done. ALS Scan may be best known, however, for their location shoots in the Caribbean, which seem to occur annually. These are a lot of fun to watch and take place at a villa and on the beach. For a site that shoots so much outdoor material the production values are incredible. These guys have the technical aspects of lighting, sound, camerawork and editing down solid. They should teach others these skills. The site offers hundreds, perhaps thousands of exclusive videos and all of them have a unique and personal feel to them. It’s like the staff are making porn that they like with no concerns about commercial value – except that what they make is so good it has exceptional value.
In terms of content, one thing that hasn’t been posted in several years and I really wish they’d shoot more of is European public nudity and body painting. I’m a big fan of this stuff and when the staff at ALS Scan did it they applied their usual high standards and made some of the best public nudity scenes available on the ‘net. (So if an ALS Scan staffer happens to read this, please, please, please shoot more public nudity!)
As for site design, it can be best described as ‘primitive.’ But while that might be a problem for many other sites it really isn’t here. Given the narrow focus of the site having a search function really wouldn’t add a lot of value. As it is, you can sort for photos or videos and you can sort by model. Beyond that not much is really needed. I think a fair contrast with the site design here might be to Videobox which had a simple, effective and plain-looking site. Then the marketers decided to make it look pretty to attract new members but in doing so they made it less user-friendly. The ALS Scan site probably looks like it did way back when they started, and since it works I hope they don’t see the need to make the site flashier at the expense of utility.
As for accessibility the site scores high here too. Downloads are fast, the site allows download managers, there appears to be no timeouts on downloads and there are no download limits. It seems that the site owners sat down and thought what they’d like if they were the customer and then did it.
Another rare attribute is that the site caters to both photo and video collectors. They offer high quality regardless of what you’re looking for. I’m not normally a photo collector, but this is one site that I make an exception. The photo quality is incredible.
Obviously I highly recommend ALS Scan, with the caveat on content. Even if you really have limited interest in the stuff they offer I’d still recommend giving them a try. The content is playful, personal and erotic thanks to the models and staff and the site lets you access it easily. That makes the site an excellent value.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Cams 24/7
Video HQ cams
Cons:
Few Girls online.
Profile pictures appear retouched and outdated.
Public chat is fully clothed.
Public chat consists of watching girls type.
Bottom Line:
Was a member in the past and so I signed up without checking out The Best Porn's rating. Big mistake.
In the past the Free chat portion consisted of young girls doing a softcore but sexy strip show. Site seems to have gone way down. Membership is inexpensive but still offers no value. You must pay more for nude chat.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very high quality, niche heavy site.
- High percentage of pretty models.
- Lots of download options (on newer scenes), newer videos go up to 1280x720 resolution. Newer photo sets top out at 1600 high end and come zipped.
- Navigation is a little harder than it should be at first. Once you figure it out, it's very easy.
- Could be a con, setting is the same in every scene. Though the room is actually quite pretty and easy on the eyes with its colors.
- Could also be a con. Every scene is of a firm, young woman being massaged then sex. Could be a con for those who bore easily.
Cons:
- I was a little frustrated with the video options. There are some videos with multiple quality options, others with just one, including some newer ones that only have the "ultra HD" option which is usually near 1 GB in size. Also have scenes that are showing unusual resolutions. Will further in BL.
- Nearly every model is slim. I put this because I know there are others who at least like some variety in model shape and size.
- Site is pretty small since "bonus" sites only allowed me to stream.
- Biggest con for me is that the site/scenes lacks much personality. In a one month membership, I did download 27 models, but according to their folder stats, all were done on 3 separate days and what is "hard" about it?
Bottom Line:
I'm approaching this review similar to how I did Teen Mega World. Outside of a few exceptions, nearly all the models here are slim. I know it's probably implied by the 18 in the name of the site, but then again, there's not a lot of "hard" sex here so you get my point. It looks like from the set ratings the more built models are very popular with members. So it surprises me they don't try to get more built models in.
I don't have too much of a problem with formulaic, but the content here is very formulaic, to the point of most of the scenes being predictable right down to the point of being able to guess (within a few minutes) when the massage stops and the sex starts. As with any site with young models, this leads to the model needing to elevate the scene which as we know can be a problem. Some seem really bored. I don't like porn where the male becomes a major part of the dialogue, but neither the male or female do much talking. Not for sure if they're going for a voyeur feel for the viewer, which is possible since the newer scenes have added a "shower" video of each model washing off after the scene. I think it would be even better if they focused on the stripping of the model instead of trying to make the model look nervous and cautious. That's the idea, maybe a scene or two of the model seducing the masseuse into doing more than a massage? Seems like the storylines with this niche are nearly unlimited, woman mad at boyfriend/husband goes to get massage and ends up cheating, seduction, etc...
For some, I would think the biggest complaint is that there isn't anything here that made me think "That's really hard sex". Maybe I should stay away from the Kink sites, but on a 10 scale, I would rate the hardness of these scenes at 5 or below.
The good parts, the models are all very pretty. They are mostly firm and end up oiled, which is always a good thing. I shouldn't say there are only slim models, since I did find 27 attractive enough to download and keep, but the curvier models really do stand out here like Isis Taylor.
I didn't notice the video quality differences until after my membership ran out. The majority of these scenes I have are 1000x564 resolution. Not that I mind that since I prefer 1280x720 max, for hard drive space, but I don't remember if that odd resolution is listed as the highest option. The options can be confusing. Some of the newer videos only have a ultra high video option. For those looking to save hard drive space or who have a slow internet connection those may be a pain to download.
The picture sets seem to follow suit in being confusing. The 1024 zips contain pictures that top out at 1500 long end.
There is one other complaint that I didn't consider a con since it's one that may not bother others and normally doesn't me. This site only updates once per week. They have quite a bit of older scenes that are 640x380 and that's the top resolution available. I understand this type of porn is probably expensive to make, but as others have mentioned Massage Creep does it while offering a full network of other sites to go with it. I also think Brazzers has gotten in on the massage scenes plus they have an entire network too. Why not remaster those older scenes, maybe 1-2 a week to help beef up the "one" update per week? And like a lot of sites, it seems some of the best scenes are only available in the lowest quality.
I did join the site through a promo or probably wouldn't have taken a chance on it. At the current price, I don't see myself returning to it. The varying score applies here too. If you like slim models, massage, add 5 points to the score. If not, subtract 5 points since I was okay with it and kind of in the middle. I like the oily massages.
Overall though, I wasn't that impressed with the content because of the scene to scene sameness which goes beyond formulaic. Most of the models look similar too. So beyond, talk, act apprehensive, fall to the seduction of the massage, have sex, you also get models who are similar build. In a way it reminds me of Amateur Allure where you had the feeling you were watching a guy live out his fantasies by posing as a porn site instead of creating porn people would want to see.
I still would recommend it for one month since the content is exclusive. I just wouldn't have high expectations unless you do prefer slimmer models. This number puts things in perspective. When I was on the site there was 226 models (June 2012). I have 27 model folders from it, so I only downloaded around 12% of the models. I would give more information on the bonus sites, but I only saw stream options for those and didn't fool with them.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Content appears to be all exclusif.
+You get access to 3 other sites.
+They have a very nice selection of teen models.
+You can stream videos online.
+They offer multiple download options for their videos which include ipod/PSP and go all the way to HD at 1080P.
+You can download the photosets in a single zip file.
+The content is all dated and they are still updating.
Cons:
-The site is tiny with only 20 scenes and since they only update about twice a month then it's going to take along time to accumulate a decent amount of content.
-Their idea of High quality picscs is 720x480 so not remotely close to HQ.
-Each video includes two girls with one guy so this may not appeal to people looking for some one-on-one.
-There are no search options and most of the performers are given a different name than the one they are more commonly known under.
Bottom Line:
*I don't know if this site can appeal to anyone other than people who are really into oral sex because each video is basically two girls giving a guy a BJ for over half an hour. There is some lesbian action between the girls like kissing, breast play and some pussy licking but that is a small part of the video. There's no sex between the guy and the girls.
*Some of the videos are nearly an hour long and that seems to be on the long side of things. The videos are all well shot and well lighted so no complaints in that department but I don't know how many people will want to sit through a half hour BJ scene and since some of the videos are nearly an hour long then that is an even longer BJ scene.
*The bulk of the girls appearing on this site have at least one scene available on a site in the network and they also do BJ on that video so you are only getting a longer BJ scene here and the added girl to the mix.
*I got access to the site with my first anal quest membership and although this type of content does very little for me. I thought I should at least add a review since there are currently none available and maybe there are some people who might be interested.
*This would not be a good stand alone site but if you are into this type of fetish and really like anal as well then you should be happy with it. If you aren't into long BJ scenes and don't like anal then avoid the entire network because that is the bulk of their content.
*I'm boosting my score a little since you get access to some great sites with your membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+You get access to 13 other sites.
+The models are all cute Eastern European.
+Videos are in HD.
Cons:
-The site is tiny with only 16 videos and they've only added 6 videos in a year. Worse one of the recent update is leased content.
-Only 4 of the other sites were more or less still updating with new content.
-Only one download video option if you want a single file.
-They don't offer the ability to stream content online on a flash player.
-The sex scenes aren't very good and the BSDM is at best described as amateurish.
-Content is not dated and I think the entire network may now be dead.
-They have pics but you have to download them one by one so why bother.
Bottom Line:
*This site was added to the teen core club network sometime in 2011 but I'm not sure why. It's certainly wasn't because they wanted to add new models to their roster since the bulk of the models have scenes on some of the network's other sites. One could say that they wanted to reach a different group of customers with their BSDM style content but frankly the BSDM is so amateurish and gimmicky that it's almost not worth mentioning. I mean you basically get one or two guys wearing ski mask who take a girl out of a dog cage and then they use a paddle for a little while, use different toys on her and finally have sex with her. The action may be a little different from the rest of the networks content but it's so amateurish and badly done that they shouldn't have bothered doing it.
*The site added only 6 videos since July of last year and one of those was leased material so the setup on that one is different from all the other videos. Mind you this site isn't the only one to have added very little content in the last 12 months. My big fear is that the entire network is now dead. They added a brand new site called teen anal casting last month and they have already stopped updating it. Not to mention that they used an update meant for that site to update try teens. Another reason why I think the network may be dead is that they always advertised upcoming updates but there are no current upcoming updates on the main network.
*I don't think this type of content will appeal to many people. The only ones that might like this are those looking to get all the videos a model has done. It certainly won't appeal to people looking for BSDM style porn because it's pretty badly done.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Very hot scenes
Great, new talents discovered and shown
Many different niches to choose from
Very friendly and efficient staff
HD option for videos
Many pictures of high quality
Well known pornstars in unseen-before themed scenes
No hidden charges, nice value for money
Cons:
Download sometimes a bit slow
A bit few updates on individual sites, but an update a day networkwide balance this con
Bottom Line:
Defintely worth the price, you don't really need to go anywhere else for quality content.
Unique, rare, exclusive shots with very nice babes and great quality as well.
I'm a very happy customer and will be for a long time ahead - definetely recommended to everybody else as well!!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+The content is all exclusif.
+You get access to a large part of the teen core club network for less money.
+They offer an excellent choice of young Eastern Europeans models.
+The sex scenes are well shot and the action is always hardcore.
Cons:
-The site has only 202 videos which is not bad per say but they've only added 58 videos since my review of 2009.
-The content isn't dated and I think that they started using updates meant for some of their other sites.
-You get access to 14 of teen core clubs sites but only 4 are really sites with new content.
-Some of the models have similar scenes on some of their other sites so content can be a little repetitive.
-There are no search options and navigation is basically choosing a page.
-There are pics but you'd have to download them one by one.
Bottom Line:
*I've always had a soft spot for try teens because these guys always manage to get hot models to do hardcore anal sex and they do a decent job of shooting the scenes. This was a constant since their early beginning but my fear is that this may now be over. I think the site and possibly the entire network is dead when it comes to new content. I've been keeping track of TCC for a long time and I started noticing that they would stop updating an older site to then start a new one which they would update for a while to then stop updating that one. They recently added hardcore youth to the network but their content is all leased material availabe on many other sites.
*The most recent try teen update should actually have been for their brand new teen anal casting site because it's the same exact setup as TAC but I guess they already had all those new videso at TAC that they elected to use one to update this site. That's nothing new since I think that they started using content meant for double teamed teens to update trye teens. Another reason why I think the network may be dead is that you always had the coming soon scenes on the site but there are none now.
*I still think that the content is well worth the join price even if they aren't updating because you get plenty for your money but it's important for any returning member to be aware that you may not have as much new content as you'd expect.
*I'm still giving the site a good score because you get access to a lot of great stuff and even the leased content could be worth it if you haven't joined a site where that stuff is.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge selection of models doing just about anything a guy could want. Excellent navigation. You can set favorites and leave feedback, which influences the scores models get. Many outstanding models. Good mix of photos and videos. Also a good mix of body shots and close ups. Probably one of the best all-teen sites around.
Cons:
Not much in the way of cons. Maybe a few more outdoor sets. Maybe a few more two-girl three-ways...
Bottom Line:
Bottom line? There is something for just about everyone here. Well worth a visit. Although this is a teen site, there is a decent variety of shapes and sizes and a good mix of solo, guy/girl and girl/girl sets. The set locations themselves are basic but not distracting. This isn't glam stuff, but the girls are nicely done-up. Some of the girls you will recognize as they are popular models elsewhere but there are a few exclusives and a few really show their best stuff here. (Just look up Zoey, Malena or a girl named Ebbi and you will see what I mean.) Navigation is great and there doesn't seem to be any really poor images or videos. The site sorts models by popularity (score) but politely stops in that category at about 9 for the benefit of the models. It also sorts by update date and model name. Note that many of the models have different names here than they do on other sites so you have to sift through them if you are looking for anyone in particular. One nice touch is that on most model's pages, there are a few large images, nude and non-nude wallpaper images and collections across all sets titled "ass". "boobs", "legs" and "close-ups". I have been a member here several times over the years and the quality has been consistent on each visit, perhaps a little better this last time. Overall, very good general teen site.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network.
-Can stream or download movies.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Content is dated.
-Model is listed for each movie.
-Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie.
-I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model.
-A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition.
-The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo.
-All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset.
Cons:
-PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month.
-Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark.
-Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video.
-Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network.
-The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the
colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s.
-The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better.
-No zip file for the photosets.
-The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Movies: 498
DVDs: 134
Pornstars: 557
Pictures: 75,388
Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option.
Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4.
Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p.
Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site.
What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including:
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Fantastic quantity of material. The girls are all very young, say, under 25. Newer videos are excellent and in HD. Newer photo sets come in high resolution. The girls appear to be having genuine fun. They use ample amounts of oil, lotion, various types of fruits and vegtables and many, many types of battery operated devices. Sets are dated and are available all the way back to 2006.
Cons:
Navigation is not as good as other sites. (For example, you can't scroll through the images in a set but have to page back out to the set menu and select the next image.) About 1 in 4 releases are actually re-releases of older material dating back as far as 2001...OK if you are a first time member but not if you are back for the 2nd or 3rd time. The narrow range of girl types, sets and specific types of odd fetish shots makes the site a little monotonous after a while. The girls wear very little or no make-up, making some that are solid 10s at other sites about a 7 here. Many of the newer models are not as attractive as models from prior years.
Bottom Line:
OK, bottom line? This is a lesbian and fetish site that is interesting to visit once just to see the show, but it caters to a relatively narrow taste. Nearly every girl is young, petite, small breasted and, of course, shaved. On the surface, that's not at all bad. Many of the girls from older sets and a few from newer ones are truly beautiful. A few headliners like Caprice, Malena Morgan and Franzeska, are easily recognizable from other sites even without much make-up. But the majority of recent girls are not particularly memorable and at best rate a notch above amatuer. Maybe after years of visiting this site I'm a little jaded. I apologize in advance if what I'm about to say seems harsh. The success of the site must mean that many people like the signature items they provide. Here are a few of those signature items:
1. There are NO boy/girl sex scenes. None. Lots of girl/girl scenes, though.
2. Practically every model gets fisted at some point. If you like that, this is paraadise.
3. There is an odd fascination with the inside of otherwise unviewable areas on the female anatomy. Examples include almost every model agreeing to use a speculum so you can see what her uturus looks like. Many models agree to use what looks like an ambroidery hoop with clothes pins spreading the labia to provide a more detailed view (think dental headgear for the pussy). Some models use glass tubes allowing a view deep inside the rectum. I guess folks are into that. I find it niether sexy, nor flattering. In a word, it makes the models clinical.
4. Just about every model has to pee at some point. The photographers show you exactly when that is.
5. Ladies, care to have your nipples, clitoris or entire vagina vacuum pumped? Yep, they do that here!
6. The first time I saw a set where a model put a lollipop in her vagina I thought it was interesting and might be tasty. That was about 100 lollipops ago. Now I find myself wondering what flavor the odd color lollipop they use is.
7. This is not a glam site. As such, the girls don't really wear much make-up. You get to see every pimple, freckle, sore, scar and bruise, whether it is on a face, a leg or a butt.
8. Allsscan has a sister site called allsangels. The webmaster/owner has no qualms with showing you a set of girls from auditions in his blog and picking out the more attractive girls to send over to ALSANGELS in an effort to sell you membership in that site much smaller for $25 a month. Sorry, all it does for me is piss me of that these better looking girls should have been but aren't on the site I'm a member of.
Ok, before you send me a nasty email, let me put a thought in your head. ALSSCAN is a bit of a sideshow. Sideshows have an odd combination of allure and freakiness that makes you want to go in to see what is there. I've seen this particular show about 5 times since the late 1990s and every few years I find myself wandering back in to see what the next big thing is going to be. (This time I think it is those emroidery hoop-clothespin things....)
Now, it is clear that the photographers have a tremendous rapport with the models as the models are usually having tremendous fun. I think this is because the models are not forced to please the camera so much. (heck, they hardly even LOOK at the camers.) Instead they are encouraged to please themselves and any other girls that happen to be nearby..and perhaps they are encouraged to experiment. Some of the best photo sets and videos come from annual outings where a dozen or so girls are chosen to go to a tropical island. Once there, they can run around naked and generally have sex with any girl they want...and they do.
So, again, bottom line...interesting place to visit but you might not want to stay for more than a month.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
§ Sexy,Erotic,Titillating themes,Passionate Stories
§ Low Membership Price,Large Bonus Site Access
§ Login,Ease of Access,Stable Site Design,Quality
§ Movie Stream Option is fast,steady & reliable
§ Multiple Movie Formats-Fair HD,WMV,MKV,IPod,Mobile
§ Excellent Membership Option - 3M/6M/12M Discounted
§ Fast/ Access/Response by Customer/Tech Support
Cons:
§ Older videos not HD & latest not real HD Formats
§ Erratic/Unpredictable Update Schedule,No support
§ Streaming in Non-HD,poor quality in full screen
§ Model/s quality is abysmal,new faces are absent
§ 90% Bonus Sites Non-Updating;Discontinued Sites
§ Reduced Footage/Bad Story lines/Quality Suffers
§ Comments section untutored,clutter, death match
Bottom Line:
TM started out as an excellent site over 3 years ago but with all that's happened,it's hard to say what went wrong! When sites start to compromise on one thing, it affects other things & leads to an overall disaster in the offerings.This is true for many but it's a site worth trying out if you like fetish & bizarre themes. However be warned as bonus scenes are with themes like Anal, Solo, Masturbation, Toys. The themes are strongly European though but the site is taking a beating. Go for it if you wish to see some cheap thrills!
Only the older content scores
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+You get access to most of teen core clubs sites
and for a lot less than that network's price.
+Their have a nice selection of models and some of these are rising Eastern European performers.
+The content is all exclusif.
+Their videos are all HD 1920x1080.
Cons:
-The site has only 10 videos and is already dead because they haven't added a new one in weeks and none are planned in their update schedule.
-A few of this sites models do a simialr scene another one of their site.
-There is no real search option and navigation is basically choosing a particular page.
-They have pics but you have to download them one by one then so why bother?
-Only 4 of the other sites are still updating with new content on a regular basis and one of these has only leased content available on many other sites.
Bottom Line:
*This would be an awful stand alone site but if you think of it as a bonus site then it's not bad at all. The girls are all cute. The sex is hot and well filmed. The only huge problem is that there are only 10 scenes and I don't think they'll be adding much ir anything to the site. I might have joined it in the futur if only for the try teens stuff but I got a sweet deal by email where I got access for 20$ so this was a no brainer for me.
*The fact that your membership gives you access to all of the teen core club sites that are still updating is a great deal even at 30$. About the only people that might want to get a TCC membership would be members that want access to some of their older sites not available with the teen anal casting membership.
*I sometime wonder why a network like TCC or 21sextury will add a site to it's line up when that site has only limited amount of content and will probably not have anymore updates. Why not incorporate those scenes in one of their active sites instead? I know that the shooting style for this site did not exactly match some of the other TCC sites but I would think that promoting what is essentialy a dead site would be a bad martketing idea.
**This is the type of site you only join if you want access to the content on the other sites. For that reason my score is much lower since I'm not really considering the other sites.**
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-2500 models (no silicone), 24750 photo sets, 2,690,000 photos, 7835 videos. -80% exclusive (see bottom line).
-Many attractive models and lots of total stunners (but I do not like more than 10% of the models here or anywhere else).
-10 softcore photo sets per model per photographer per shoot plus some hardcore.
-Many repeat visits from models.
-Photosets in three resolutions (Not all on older sets): 1024, 1500-1600, 3000 with full and custom zips.
-Updates: 5x12 photosets (80-200pics each) and 2x14 videos (10 to 20 min ave 15min each) videos per week. i.e. 60 photo sets and 28 videos per week,
-Videos in several formats, inc "HD mp4" (1280x720 @ 6Mbps. 1920x1080 starting to appear) and streaming.
-Good model directory and search facility.
-Opt-in for newsletter and promos.
-Customisable for viewing sizes etc.
-Works with Firefox and DownThemAll and FDM (see Reply #1).
-Bills via CCBill - no regional pricing
Cons:
-Links time out after a few hours.
-Some technically flawed colour (but most is good).
-Size not indicated on video download links. So, if you go for "HD mp4", you do not know if it is 720p or 1080p until you have downloaded it.
-Pages can be very slow to load, especially the thumbnail pages, but zip download speeds are good. It is best to choose 20 thumbs per page rather than "all".
-Although download managers are allowed and work fine (tested with FDM), see Reply #1 for some cautions.
- No "mature" models (but site does not claim to have them)
-"Themes" such as "Lingerie" or "Uniforms" are incidental, not central.
-Some non exclusive content for some photographers such as Fred or Defrancesco.
Bottom Line:
ATK Galleria (ATKG) has been my "gold standard" for about 12 years and it still is. There are a lot of statistics in the pros and cons, above, so it might be more useful if I explain here why I like Galleria so much.
I collect photos and I see it as primarily a photo site, despite its huge number of videos. Nubiles is stronger on video quality. If you prefer softcore teen video, with masturbation or toys, and are happy with 4 vids per model, Nubiles is the place. You might come to ATKG to add to those.
As far as photos go, ATKG operates in the same general genre as KarupsPC, KarupsHA and Nubiles but it has generally better quality and a very much larger quantity: four times as many images as Nubiles, twice as many as MetArt. It seems reasonable that signup gives you access just to ATKG and not to the ATK Network.
One thing I really love is the many repeat shootings for a lot of its models. You get 10 softcore photosets whenever a photographer shoots the model. If she is shot again, and she often is, you get another 10 photo sets. Those may be from the same photographer a year later or from a different one. Hardcore sets, if any, are on top of that count. Riley Reid, for example, has 43 photo sets and 9 videos here. That is 13 hardcore photo sets plus two separate shoots of 10 softcore sets from one photographer and a 10 set shoot from a second. Her videos span the same two photographers and include toys, hardcore, lesbian, behind the scenes and a camshow recording.
All photo sets for each model go up between one day and a week apart. Videos are less predictable and not all models do them.
Of the nearly 25000 photo sets, photographer Fred's 1600 sets and Denys Defrancesco's 1000 sets are largely not exclusive. But the rest are, as far as I can tell. So I guess 80% exclusive overall.
ATKG is nothing like MetArt, Femjoy or any of the artsy sites. Shoots are amateur in style, professional quality but not glossy. Girls are committed and enthusiastic and engage with the viewer. Some toy use but most sets do not involve toys. Almost all start clothed, if sometimes scantily, and end full nude but sometimes get there after 20 images of a 150 image set. The journey is less important than the destination at ATKG but you do get some tease in most shoots and explicit shots with direct eye contact, provocative facial expressions, minimal looking down or away and plenty of finger spreading pussy.
There are "themes" such as Uniforms, Lingerie, Upskirts and Panties, Babes, Amateurs, Coeds, Masturbation, Toys, Foot fetish, Nudism, Lesbian, Watersports, Action. But some of those are pretty loosely defined. I often cannot even tell what the softcore theme was when I look at the downloaded set.
Take lingerie. The girl may be wearing some under some everyday clothes or she may start in it. She strips via a short tease but without the emphasis on the sensuality of the lingerie that you would get on a fetish site.
ATK's tour gives away a massive amount of actual content. Click the "visit site" link from this PU page, go to the bottom right of the page you arrive at and click the ATKingdom thumbnail. It takes you to their free site on which you will find about 80 full size (3000x2000) images from Galleria, 80 from ATK Hairy and some from Premium, all from their most recent sets and changed every week. There are no sample videos there, suggesting a bias towards photos. At the top of the page from "visit site", you have the whole model directory, which shows how many photo sets and videos every model has.
ATKG shows the work of 97 photographers from around the world. Its women are shaved, aged between 18 and 45, but most are young. There are only 15 models aged over 30. 1300 aged 18-20, 1030 21-23. Some models have tattoos or piercings but there is no silicone here. Most are Caucasian girl-next-door types (only 5 black and 11 Asian) and there is a separate site for ethnics - ATK Exotics - with a separate subscription. Some of the Galleria models also appear on the other ATK sites but without duplication of actual photo sets or videos. e.g. she might be shaved here but have hairy sets on ATK Hairy. Note that, if a model is on ATK Petites, membership there gives you her Galleria content too. But not vice versa.
I highly recommend ATKG as a large and high quality source of explicit softcore photo sets, in overtly sexual and amateur (but not amateurish) style. It will specially appeal to anyone who wants everything they can find of a loved model. I believe 96 is valid for what the tour area makes clear you will find.
But if your main thing is softcore video, score 86. There is bg and gg but it does not come over as a hardcore site. If you prefer those, score 80. And there is none with a story line here. It is plain sex. As I am not interested in bg, gg or video, it is hard for me to evaluate them. If you want fetish themes, score 76.
I have joined many times over 12 years. "member < 1 month" applies just to this join.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
A large selection of attractive, exotic models.
Nice and crisp photography.
Fair to good HD videos (depending on photographer).
Huge daily updates (5 picture sets Monday-Friday, 1 retro picture set on Saturday, 10 movies on Sundays)
Excellent download speeds for me.
Very attractive home page.
Cons:
Be warned, I decided to be very subjective, most ATK Exotics subscribers may vehemently disagree:
There is a deadly sameness to most picture sets even though the skin color varies. See bottom line.
I would prefer to have video updates on a daily basis rather than having to wait one week for the next update. I think a change there would be very important to those of us whose taste changed from collecting pictures to videos.
Saturday's update is dedicated to picture sets from their archives. Last week they were all dated 2005. This might be a plus for some and would be for me if they were in today's high resolution.
I still don't understand this “volume” business after many subscriptions to ATK's sites.
An email sent to support over five days ago never brought an acknowledgment.
Bottom Line:
I really thought I was done with mixed picture/video sites, especially those whose emphasis is heavily on pictures, but a very attractive email offer showed up and I couldn't resist, figuring that a site with such a vast amount of material would have some sets that would re-ignite my interest in pictures.
In vain!
There are some sets where the model wears a pretty nightie or other lingerie (mostly cotton panties) but those sets are exceedingly rare and when you do run across them chances are the model divests herself of same nightie or lingerie within the first ten pictures.
What this site amounts to is a heap of nice, fresh, good looking young ladies of all ethnic stripes wearing similar three items consisting of an abbreviated top, bottom (jeans or cut-offs) and panties or bras alternating, seldom does one see both together on one model.
Okay, you can add a pair of shoes or sneakers and make it four. Five with sox! But it all comes off on page one, page two at the latest!
There is no teasing, there is not enough clothing to make the set a good strip sequence, it is mostly simply a casual taking off of the few aforementioned items, and then on to a drawn out series of pictures showing the nude model from all angles. One could remove two thirds of these pictures and still have a complete set.
There is also a great misunderstanding on ATK's part of what “upskirt” really means, as only one example of inaccurate tagging. To most of us it has always meant a shot taken from floor level of the pantied (or naked) crotch above, but here it means everyone who spreads their legs with panties on. They might even start out in Jeans, but the tag says “upskirt.”
In ATK's defense, it is not because of any of their sites (and I've subscribed to most) that I quit collecting pictures, nor do I mean to imply that they are worse than most, since other picture sites are using identical dress and identical ways of shooting a model.
Not a single one of them seems to think that lingerie might be important to anyone nowadays and they might very well be right judging by all the sets designated “hot,” but this review is written for those like me who like “erotic” sets and might be disappointed because they don't find them.
To those who do like young and pretty models who can't be bothered with the inconvenience of putting on more than the bare essentials, this site is recommended!
It is also recommended for the technical quality of its pictures and videos alike, as well as for their generous daily updates.
It is a good site but not for anyone over thirty who likes a bit of spice (meaning erotic lingerie) along with their pretty women.
I left out the technical details because they are mentioned in other reviews and also because, for once, I wanted to drop objectivity in order to voice a purely personal, subjective beef when it comes to picture sites and the current state of erotic photography.
I did keep the score itself high because if would be unfair to make the site suffer because of my personal prejudices.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
One of the 8 sites that make up Latin Teen Pass which is included as a free bonus package when subscribing to other company sites such as Karla Spice, GiGi Spice etc
Exclusive content although 4 photo sets also are duplicated on La Zona Modelos but exclusive to this network I believe.
Fairly decent photo and video quality although not particularly hi res or hd
Zip downloads for all photo sets
Choice of 3 or 4 download options for videos
Billing by CCBill
Cons:
Regional pricing outside US
No longer updating
Content not date stamped
No file sizes listed, scene descriptions or previews for the videos.
Bottom Line:
This is the solo website of Latina model Cierra Spice who according to her site is a 19 year old college student from the US. She has long black hair, a nice petite body with smallish 34B breasts and a nice round booty. She also has a small tattoo just above her ankle which I hardly noticed. On her site you will see Cierra wearing various outfits usually followed by a striptease to full explicit nudity often followed by some masturbation and the use of toys. It’s all solo action here so you won’t see Cierra having sex with any other boys or girls.
In total Cierra has 94 photo sets (8889 photos) and 48 videos. The photos are mostly 797 x 1200 px in size and all sets have a zip download. There’s a good mix of indoor and outdoor shoots and a good variety of outfits to stop them becoming too repetitive. Most of the videos give you 4 download options with a high and low quality wmv, a quicktime mov and ipod mp4 version. The high quality wmvs I downloaded were generally 720 x 540 with a bitrate of 4066 kbps. The videos range from about 6 to 15 minutes in length and often take the format of a question and answer session with the cameraman for 2 or 3 minutes while posing in a cute outfit, followed by stripping and masturbation. A few of the videos are simply films of the photo shoot.
This is now just an archived photo and video collection with no updates and no model interaction. The only extras are a few wallpapers, friends galleries and a journal which only has entries from February until September 2009 so I would guess there has been nothing new happening at the site for a couple of years.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
