Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!


Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 51-73 of 73 Page :    < Previous Page

Visit Scoreland

51. Scoreland (0)

xyzzy (11) 07-29-08  12:42pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well-established name in the industry. You know what content you're getting with this site!
- Large model archive, including both natural breasts and silicone-pumped monsters
- Updated nearly every day!
- Good selection of videos and photos, with different resolution offers
- Rewards loyalty; you receive extra sites added to your account the longer you stay, featuring more exclusive content. This is a great idea.
- photo and video clarity is good; even the gonzo-style shoots feel professional and well-shot
Cons: - Site can be a pain to navigate. Way too many options, menus, etc. Some links don't work or crash. Pages are not consistent; some photoshoots have a completely different layout to others.
- maximum of 6 downloads at once
- It's just what you'd expect from reading the magazine. All the photos have pretty much the same style, the language is the same..etc. A little bit of variety would help.
- Scoreland don't choose models for their beauty, but for their bustline. Some of them are just, well, ugly. Sorry girls.
- Varying content on each model. You may browse and find a model you like, only to discover she only has one bad photoset, from 1998.
- Download speed isn't great, for me in the UK. I have a 2Mb/s connection, but sometimes was barely getting 48kb/s, and never more than 500kb/s
- no complete archive of the Score magazines, which I would have liked to see.
Bottom Line: So, if you're a fan of big boobs, Scoreland is obviously the place to be. They've been going for decades now in print, producing the same kind of professional-quality boob pictorials ever since the beginning.

I'd say it's definitely worth giving the site a try. There's a large collection of models (albeit some have very little content), new updates every day or so, and loads of content. And the way that they give you an extra site every few weeks is awesome, it's a great incentive to stay.

The biggest problem with the site is that it just gets boring after a while. Everything looks the same; the models all use the same poses; the lighting doesn't vary much. Even the hardcore all seems vaguely similar. You find yourself watching the vids and thinking, "why didn't they just change the formula a bit?"

I ended up just going through the model list, picking the models I liked the look of, and downloading their content. I barely glanced at the homepage or updates, which is a bad sign.

Don't get me wrong, it's still a professional, entertaining site with great content and regular updates, and it's a must-subscribe if you're a breast fanatic, even if it's just for a month. But after a while, it all just looks the same.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Mag

52. Naughty Mag (0)

WeeWillyWinky (88) 04-07-08  11:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons: - Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line: Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.

While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.

The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.

I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.

It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Color Climax

53. Color Climax (0)

exotics4me (463) 01-07-08  06:58pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Classic site that has more content than I imagined
- Newer content that helps those of us who weren't even born when some of this porn came out
- Site navigation is pretty straight-forward, continued in cons.
- Videos are very good quality 720 on high end
- No obsession with facials, which is a good thing for me. The site brings a different view to porn that is a breath of fresh air to current times formulaic approach.
Cons: - As others have mentioned, the videos are in quicktime. Will explain more in BL
- I can't understand anything they are saying in the movies, but the language is probably better this way than with English voiceovers
- Some of the content is really seriously vintage stuff, not that it is a bad thing, but it is a harsh reminder at times of how far porn has come
- My download speeds are not good, only 700 kb/s on a 10M connection, about 300 kb/s lower than my average on other sites
Bottom Line: One of the biggest selling points for me is that we don't have the typical porn of current times, where the man absolutely has to give the woman a facial. The sex in these videos comes across as less staged.

The photos aren't bad, though we aren't talking Met-Art level here. The photos are available in zips. The video part, the VLC media player plays these without having to load the resource hog quicktime player. I also can recommend Windows Media Classic to watch the QT videos on. Both of these are my preferred video players anyway, so it doesn't bother me to not have WMV files.

My only real complaint is that some of the content does go way back in time. The site really does separate "classic" from "vintage" with most classic porn these days being from the late 80s. Some of this looks to be from the early 70s, maybe earlier.

A comment on the language, not for sure what they are speaking, maybe German? Either way, if dialogue in your porn matters, make sure you can understand the language. Like the old saying goes, all women moan in the same language, and that is really all that matters to me.

Overall, I am happy with the site, and really don't have many real complaints about it. I would imagine someone really into vintage porn would love it even more. A better search engine really wouldn't help since I don't any of these models by name. DL speeds did bother me. Still I recommend it to those into older porn, and those just looking for something different.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Color Climax

54. Color Climax (0)

Pornjackker (37) 12-05-07  03:58pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (28), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Great site for retro porn enthusiasts
Lots of Photo-sets and video shorts
Vanilla to very kinky fetishes explored
New Color Climax videos
Updates Daily
Video and Photo set zip Downloads
Good Customer Service
Online Store
Cons: Video Downloads only in Quicktime Formats
Videos have no screen-shots to preview scenes
No English speaking videos
Bonus Hustler videos can only seen in feed format
Bottom Line: Ive been a Color Climax subscriber before
and it's probably on of my top favorites.
The content is often playful funny and highly
creative. The glut of porn in today's world
leaves a lot to be desired. It rarely entertains
the way vintage material does for some reason.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Naughty Mag

55. Naughty Mag (0)

silver (41) 11-19-07  02:22am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Lots of real amateur action
+ Over 500000 amateur pictures
+ Hi-Res pics
+ Well-designed site
+ Exclusive content
+ Frequent updates (near daily)
+ Live video feeds
+ MPEG, WMV, MOV video formats
+ ZIP file is provided
+ No DRM protection
+ No download limit
+ Easy to navigate
Cons: - A little bit pricey maybe
- Not many videos in comparison with amount of pics
Bottom Line: Naughty Mag is a online magazine featuring amateur content from several sources. This site offers an amazing collection of amateur pics and videos. Everything, beginning from masturbation and ending with hardcore where inexperienced sluts are practicing cock-sucking and try their first anal. This content is always amateur but there are a lot of different categories to surf. The navigation is simple enough for a kid but in the race for quality, there is no finish line. It could be improved. The pictures are pretty big and clear. I was really pleased with the quality. They come in two screen sizes, 800x600 and 1600x1200. Each set is thumbnailed and can be downloaded in a convenient zip file. Videos are available for download in short clips. It is very nice for downloading, but not so convenient for viewing. Nevertheless, vids in MPEG (1500Kbps, 640x480) look fantastic, even at fullscreen. In addition to all this, I've also got access to live video feeds covering everything from hardcore to solo girls. All the video feeds are available 24/7. If you are an admirer of amateurs, like me, Naughty Mag is a must see.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Color Climax

56. Color Climax (0)

jd1961 (95) 10-29-07  06:32am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - A Lot Of Material
- NO DRM Protection
- Legendary Color Climax Catalog Of Film
- CC Magazine Scans
- Good Download Speed
- Modern Material Along With The Vintage
- Zip Files
Cons: - Only Quicktime Videos For Download
- No Hi-Res Photos
- Some Low-Res Videos
- No Tiny Tove Jenssen
Bottom Line: For those that appreciate erotica and it's history, Color Climax is a must join. If you are prejudiced against the past, you won't like this site. Color Climax is the seminal Danish company that brought the world it's first legal pornography, Denmark being the first country that legalized porn. They were the kings of erotica in their day, and you can see why by viewing their wonderful film and photo archives. They do present more modern material here, but the highlight of the site are the old CC loops. In the old days, these were expensive to buy, and you can download them all here with no DRM hassle. They only come in Quicktime though (.mov and mp4) you'll need Qucktime7 to play the higher res (720x520) videos, or VLC player. Mac users won't mind, and I don't either because these films are priceless to the serious collector of erotica. No one made porn like the old CC. They have lower res (800px) scans of their old magazines, which include a whole section of Anushka Marek. Still stunning even without the hi-res,they are available in zips. Sad to say that it seems they have pulled all the legendary Tiny Tove material from the site, I can't find it. This is a great trip back to the land of Denmark when it led the way to freedom of sexual expression in the world. If you appreciate such sentiments, don't miss this site, because nowadays, porn has lost all it's charm IMO.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Playboy Plus

57. Playboy Plus (0)

pat362 (373) 10-27-07  07:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (68), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: The price for a 5 day trial is amazing, and you get to see a lot. There is enough to satisfy your average Playboy fan. The quality of the pictures is excellent. Navigation is made easy.
Cons: This may just be me, but I don't want to have to call to cancel my membership. If I join online, I should be able to cancel online, but not with Playboy plus. You have to call an 800 number to cancel your membership. Although you do get access to some magazine. they only go back a few years.
Bottom Line: I joined this site because I wanted access to their archive of magazines, but since they only had a few, I was really disapointed. Then the method for cancelling membership gave me a really bad taste. The trial price of 2.95$ for 5 days is unbeatable.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Hustler

58. Hustler (1)

Denner (235) 10-09-07  01:39pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (77), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Large amount of centent
Nice/swell US and european models
Good 3-days trial price
Cons: Average/poor quality for videos
DRM for the best quality videos
Strange navigation
Hopeless way of watching and downloading videos.
Photos in average/low solution
No zip (could not find it, anyway)
Bottom Line: This is a strange site.
Hustler is a wellknown name even for us europeans and Larry Flint too.
Still I do not understand why a coorporation this size make such a poor web-site - compared to content amount and other qualities. (well, and again I do - like Playboy and Penthouse sites that never seems to be able to hit the top, it's still strange).
I go for videos - and it takes almost a day or two to get to know the strange way of viewing and especially downloading videos - and there's no preview, apart from a small thumbnail of the front-cover. You have to "preview-stream" first to find the scenes you MAY like.
I found a way to download some videos in "the best quality". But when I opened the videos, the quality were miles away from what is just average for newer clips.
The streams are certainly not better.
The content - models, sex-scenes and what not -is generally not better than the average videos at VideoBox - just worse in quality.
I gave up trying to download photos...
Well, there might be a lot of extras here like Hustler Humor, Hustler Mobile, Live chat and so on, but that's not my kind of game (site)
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

59. 18 Eighteen (0)

WeeWillyWinky (88) 09-23-07  09:08pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (51), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Lots of content.
- Mostly cute models.
- Choice of small or large pics.
- Zips.
- Sticks to the "eighteen-y" niche
- Trial gives you full access, but join with a back up processor if you can. See below.
Cons: - Navigation is a hassle, until you get used to it.
- Pics are not top-notch quality and have a grainy appearance.
- Vids section needs organization.
- Search function is bare-bones
- Don't read the text which accompanies the photo-sets, unless you think these girls are actually virgins.
- Cancelling can be a hassle. Save your sub ID number and other info.
Bottom Line: I'm going to go out on a limb and say that I really like this site. This is mainly because of the nature of the content and not so much the physical quality of it, which leaves a bit to be desired. I'm refering to the pics mainly since I'm not much into video.

Going into the archives I was impressed that sets going back to 1999 still offer pics in large format, and by and large they look fair. If you look at pics that old at ATK, for example, ATK's look ancient by comparison. I understand that large size doesn't equal high-quality, but bear in mind this is a magazine site, and the pics have a magazine-ish look to them. Are they actually scans? I don't know. In the newer sets the large pics (landscape format) fill up my 22 inch monitor and don't look too bad at all. A great many look downright excellent.

There is a marked emphasis on white panties which is as much a plus for me as it will be a negative for others. Elvis would have a good time here. As for the models: they are typically very cute and plain girls are scarce. There is definitely a teeny-bopperish feel to the site and the models fit perfectly with that kind of thing.

Elvis and me, we'd be mates.

A word on the vids. The few I've downloaded so far look good, though some are so grainy they are unwatchable. The "submitted" vids section is very good, from what I've seen.

I've only been here a week so I can't comment on updates. I'm here to collect the backlog anyway.

The trial is no longer a full-trial, but now offers only limited access to the material.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Penthouse

60. Penthouse (0)

Drooler (220) 08-28-07  04:26pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (82), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: +Many beautiful women -- established stars and newbies, too
+Pic galleries and videos of softcore posing/masturbation, lesbian, HC b/g, bb/g, b/gg, bb/gg
+zips/pics in 5 sizes (800, 1200, 2000, 3000, 4000) starting May 2006; before then, many max at 1600
+Not nec. “exclusive,” but nice pic sizes!
+monthly “calendars” for access to content, or by model or “pet”
+additional features: chat with models, store, and “reading” (video reviews, sex advice, and reading for auto-erotic purposes)
Cons: -preview of current month's updates only; takes 4 clicks into the tour to reach it
-qty of pics per gallery varies a lot from < 20 to > 100
-movement to earlier calendar requires lots of clicking back, OR a change in the month’s URL (e.g., change ?m=7&y=2007 to ?m=3&y=2006 to see March 2006)
-calendars go no further back than June 2005 (and that’s just a partial one)
-video downloads even in their best quality (320x240) are below par; there is 640x480 for streaming
Bottom Line: 1. It’s best as a photo site. July 2007 had 37 solo pic galleries, 11 g/g galleries, and 4 HC galleries, 18 HC videos (always broken into 3-6 scenes), and 9 softcore “BTS” videos.
2. The videos serve best as previews of professional productions. The quality of the vids here ain’t at the “keeper” level. Check the online “store” for DVDs.
3. It’s an erotic resource with the chat and the readings and, again, the store which sells, for example, an operationally viable replica of Cassia Riley’s pussy. (Nope. I don’t have one.)

So if you have it for Cassia, with this site it is possible to set up a multimedia blitz for yourself.

For awhile over the past year or so, they were posting “vintage” ‘70’s and ‘80’s photos in larger sizes, but not that many. It didn’t seem to catch fire. Wasn’t very good! That ‘80’s big hair looks ridiculous.

Yes, Penthouse has been around for a long time, but this site only starts delivering the really good stuff from May ’06 on. Enormous images of beauties like Hanna Hilton, Shay Laren, Jamie Lynn, and Crystal Klein baring their fine bee-hinds is very nice indeed … when they do. And you can vote on the photosets. The quality can sometimes be so-so.

Some galleries are from sources that have their own sites, like Digital Desire or MishaOnline, so don’t expect it always to be exclusive.

Wish they’d republish a lot of Hank Londoner’s work in 4000px. THAT would be great! But do they have rights to it? I dunno.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Watch 4 Beauty

61. Watch 4 Beauty (1)

jd1961 (95) 08-07-07  10:02pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (1)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: - Hi-Res Photos
- Zip Files Available
- Great Models
- Good Price
Cons: - Not Many Videos
- Navigation Could Be Better
- Not A Huge Amount Of Material
Bottom Line: I've been getting into these so-called "glamour" sites lately, mostly for the photos. This is one of the better examples of these sort of sites. The models here are really hot, let's face it--Europe is blowing away the U.S. as far as erotica is concerned at the moment. The girls are just a lot better looking. The problem at this site is that they don't yet have enough models or sets to justify a multi month membership as of yet. I got everything I wanted in my 1 month membership, but what great stuff it is! The photos are hi-res, and great looking. The photography is a lot more erotic than that of similiar sites. Not a lot of "statue posing" here. You can choose up to 5000 pix(!), but as I said, as of this review there are only 85 models. They have HD video also, not a whole lot yet. Personally, I find the "glamour" vids boring, but that's my prejudice---if that's your cup of tea, you won't be disappointed I guess. You can choose between wmv and quicktime. But back to the photos, I love them! They're in the magazine style, with titles like "Provoking Cock"! The navigation---while the member's area is very attractive, the navigation is a bit irritating. You click the model, go to her page. You click her picture, get the sets. You click a set, and then you have to click the cover, and then you're finally there! And they don't include the cover in the set, you have to save the hi-res cover and place it in yourself. Site is updated frequently. it will be better in a year.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

62. 18 Eighteen (0)

Schnitzel (29) 07-11-07  02:08am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (21), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Exclusive content.
-Majority of the models are probably 18, rather than 20/21.
-Mostly pretty models.
-No DRM.
-Ability to download pictures at different resolutions.
Cons: -Video quality could be improved.
-Would like to see more updates.
-Content doesn't justify the cost.
-Site design is somewhat scattered.
-Some of the girls are uninspiring, they look like they'd rather be elsewhere.
-Scenes feel scripted and can get repetitive.
Bottom Line: 18 Eighteen looks like a great site from the homepage. But what you see on the tour is basically as good as its going to get.
The video quality is poor by todays standards, even on the newer videos and the fact that the girls are uninspiring is a turn-off.

There are probably more pictures available than videos too, although one can download the pictures in ZIP archives at various resolutions which is fairly useful.

If you like the youngest porn possible, 18 Eighteen's content is certainly that, and is exclusive, models are physically attractive for the most part and fortunately DRM is not used.
If the site was $10 cheaper, then I'd probably recommend it, but they need to either lower the price or improve on the bad points.

Until that happens, I would struggle to really recommend this site unfortunately.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Hustler

63. Hustler (1)

DigglerFL (17) 06-23-07  10:21am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Tons of Content
- Hot Girls, and not the same ones over and over
- Entire Barely Legal Library
Cons: - Search could be better. When searching for a girl it only returns the video and you won't know which scene she is in
- no previews or clips
- not many updates
- quality is only medium
- downloads are medium speed
- can't sort videos so browsing can be tedious
- downloads have DRM if you use the provided download links
Bottom Line: IMO, Barely Legal is the best porn series ever devised, so most of my points are for access to the 250+ scenes in this series. I also have a tool which allows me to save them without the DRM, so if you dont' have one of those then you might be disappointed. There's about 4 updates a week, thats 4 full videos so 16-20 scenes, but Barely legal updates are only about 1 per month, if that. Quality is watchable but not what you'd hope for from a site in 2007. Searching can be a pain, and there are no previews so you have to start watching each scene to see if its of interest. It could be a lot better, but the content is excellent. Mr Beaver is a hoot.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

64. 18 Eighteen (0)

Douggie (10) 06-14-07  05:08pm
Rookie Badge  Top Monthly User TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: *Exclusive girls
*Trial join
*pretty girls
* A euro site that actually has vibrators with batteries!
Cons: Hate to be negative but......

*Very Very limited video
*Formats to finding videos are crappy
*Very limited updates
*A lot of video unable to play (corruption error or weird format that cautions people when they try to install).
* There boasts about how often they update is B.S.
Bottom Line: My postings are about video only......and mainly solo female video....I dont look at pictures.

I belong to thefemaleorgasm.com. I frequesnt there forum and there are several running posts about random sites. I told them I would check this one out.....ppppffffttt I have been here before. There homepage threw me off for some reason.

Its been quite a while (I would say a couple of years) since I was last there. There wastn too much more being offered. I think they mainly update there photo section which is pretty common. Very limited video. Fewer yet videos that are solo. Glad they had a trial membership. I wouldnt pay much more even if it were monthly.

Its too bad.....with the models they get in. If they were to concentrate on solo video instead of pictures they would be a hit. Im not saying that cause Im a solo female fanatic.....but lets face it...there arent too many out there.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit XL Girls

65. XL Girls (0)

roseman (253) 06-07-07  04:23am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (66), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Great monthly sub price (only 15 USD) & awesome FREE 7 days trial.
- Tones of content to download.
- Photosets available for download in ZIP format.
- Videos can be downloaded in parts (clips) or as full movies.
- Website design is very nice and navigation is easy.
- Frequent updates.
- Exclusive content.
- Downloading was pretty fast for me.
- Bonus content and customers support section.
Cons: - Some photos quality is average.
- Videos quality could be even better.
- No magazine archieves.
- Some content looks old.
Bottom Line: XL Girls is one of the best adult sites if you are looking for such content.
When you sign up and log in to members area you will find out that tones of content are available for download and surely will like it ;)
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format (sizes 800x600 or 1600x1200) and videos in .wmv or .mpeg
making downloading very easy and simple.
Website design is very cool and navigation is quite easy making member's life easier. You can search by models name or by category making your day better ;-)
From the other hand there are a few things that need improvement, thing that I am sure that it will be taken care of in the near future by sites owners. For example, there are no magazines archieves, which would be definitely good, at my opinion.
I surely recommend this one for lovers of big boobs, it's a great choice especially while monthly sub price is so low.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Barely Legal

66. Barely Legal (0)

Doug (3) 05-30-07  04:19pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: 1. Hot girls.
2. Navigation is retarded.
3. Poor photo selection.
4. They make absolutely sure that you don't know what you're getting into, so you can't see how shitty this site is until you join!
Bottom Line: You'd think that a company like Hustler, with such a wealth of content, would make a site worth joining. But they protect their content like a mother grizzley bear, in fear that they just might give us our money's worth. This site is horrible and a huge ripoff. Hustler is greedy.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Hustler

67. Hustler (1)

exotics4me (463) 05-20-07  10:26am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (85), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Ah the memories of opening my first Hustler!
- I'm downloading the clips from the site, someone else mentioned this and how TBP lists the videos as streaming or in browser only.
- Some of the best models in the world on here!
- Tons of pictures available
- 3 Updates per week
- Cheaper than renting them!
Cons: - Higher prices than most sites, especially considering the smaller library when compared to videobox, vixeo, pornstarxs.
- I am almost positive that I joined this site last year for $9.95, now it is $34.95. Maybe the trade off is being able to keep the videos?
- Too many anal movies
Bottom Line: I like the way Hustler has pushed the envelope over the years and for once, actually mean it when I say that when it was magazines instead of online, I really did read the articles and jokes!

The videos are downloading just fine for me, and the majority are of average quality. I'm really thinking the raise in price and not great quality is because they are letting us download and keep the videos.

The preview section of the site is another great one, as it lets you see how the site works, navigation on here is top-notch. I really like the site, but it isn't going to be one that I visit often. Even with 3 updates per week, I can download a full DVD in probably 15-20 minutes, so it isn't worth much more than a join, download everything you want, come back 6 months later.

The big question for me is, is the site worth that high price? Yes, if it is your first time joining it. Upwards of 200 full DVDs from Hustler would cost thousands of dollars to buy. After that, I don't think it would be worth anything more than stopping by once a year.

I'm not really into anal, they have loads of anal, nearly every scene ends in anal and they have full series' with the word anal in the title. This would be another negative for me when considering joining. I've heard a lot of the porn models these days are more into the anal than vaginal because it pays more.

Bottom line, if you haven't been a member, I recommend it for one month, otherwise, can't say I recommend it.
Respond: 2 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Hustler

68. Hustler (1)

Woodruff (37) 03-14-07  06:35pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (27), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: * Excellent videos such as Barely Legal series
* Array of video options (format, bandwidth) - and I'm not sure TBP's claim of DRM is correct
* Pretty good choice of contract girls (Memphis Monroe, Joey Hart, etc) - even though I disapprove of contract girls on principle :)
* Bunch of content beside videos - I haven't really gone through the other stuff
Cons: * Each movie's scenes are not necessarily labeled for which girl is in which scene
* No explicit download option - although it's easy to download
* Must download whole scenes - no partial clips
* Search engine by girl/title/etc is not always accurate - sometimes misses scenes or generates false results
Bottom Line: Hustler has some great video content - in addition to the magazine and other stuff I haven't checked out much. Movies like the Barely Legal series are awesome. The only problem is that, like other [non-Internet] production company sites, they just stick the movies up there, so it's not as flexible and easy to navigate as the Internet-focused networks.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit 18 Eighteen

69. 18 Eighteen (0)

senorim (19) 02-22-07  06:08pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (17), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *exclusivity
*photo size 800*600 to 1000*1200
Cons: *navigation confuse
*poor quality in general
*videographer and edition in videos
*selling everywhere
Bottom Line: Seems to me,they sales magazines and had the idea
to upload a porn site.Of course there's a lot of
(poor)photos.They have a few sections.By example=
hardcore,but it has only TWO VIDEOS!!
-Think the main problem on videos is the camera-
man:loose the focus,staggering in the interviews,
in zoom-out you can see the lamps??The girls,well-
some almost get sleep in solo session and I almost
fall down from the chair too!!.They drops the dil-
do,hits their head with the sofa.oh my!
There's a thing called EDITION.
-Expensive site,could cost 50% less.
-Under your own risk.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit XL Girls

70. XL Girls (0)

jonesyboy (23) 01-14-07  06:36am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros: -Tons of content
-Large, natural breasts? This is the place
-latest vids are solid quality
-Easy to navigate
-hardcore and softcore
-Updates regular and consistent
Cons: -Difficult to cancel (See bottom line)
-Annoying tendency to post updates already seen on Scoreland (some years old)
-Isses with replying to email questions\complaints
Bottom Line: If you love natural breasts (and unlike it's sister site Scoreland, this site is all natural), then you will be busy for a long, long time.

So overall I would recommend this site.

But the first two cons really hold the score down. It seems the only way to join is with Scoreland's provider and not through CCBill or the like. Which would be OK except they don't send a confirmation email when you join, which makes it much harder to cancel.

Also, the last time I was a member I didn't receive a cancel mail either, which forced me to contact them to verify.

The more conspiracy-minded among us might think they do this on purpose, but decide for yourself on that.

Also, the posting of sets that are already available elsewhere (on Scoreland) is not good. Many updates I've seen I recall seeing before (years ago sometimes).

But overall, there's no question this site is worth a membership (just make sure you catch the URL on the joinpage so you know where to go to cancel).
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Color Climax

71. Color Climax (0)

studslut (8) 01-12-07  08:21pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (7)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Bottom Line: I've been subscribed to CC since before I was supposed to. It's really dirty stuff from the days of the 8mm stag reels.

Most of the features are from the early seventies, and showcase Nordic models doing things that would be considered taboo even today, so I can only imagine that back then it was a downright act of sadism on behalf of the producers.

I myself avoid watersport porn like I do girls on the rag, but because I'm a European 70's afficionado, I have to tolerate it here. And it's a part of almost every feature, too.

The girls are for the most part, ugly. Sorry, I'm not going to lie. None of them are on the level of say, an Uschi Digart so don't expect to see big-titted Swiss misses. Also the sex ranges from dull to terrible. The appeal for me here is the historical value of the CC brand. CC if you don't know were among the first major porn studios, covering everything from basic sex to barnyard beastialty, to something they'd probably not like to be remembered for, kiddie porn. That's right, CC built most of their company on exploiting very little girls in the very beginning of their run. Of course none of that is available on the site, but it's a part of their identity that will never be forgiven.

Like I said, if you like vintage flicks from the 70's, particularly those with greasy Europeans with incontinence problems, then this is the site for you. If this isn't your niche then I don't suggest that you peek here.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Perfect 10

72. Perfect 10 (0)

Bacchus (30) 01-11-07  06:49pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: *Plenty of European models to drool over.
*Every model has a perfect body.
*There are plenty of updates available.
Cons: *Models could have more picture content.
*Video section is almost an after thought.
*No links to other hot model sites.
*No bonus content.
Bottom Line: If you desire to have a site with absolutely drop dead gorgeous models with absolutely perfect bodies then subscribe to perfect 10. If you want tons of videos accompanying this variety of pics, then this site is not for you.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

Visit Penthouse

73. Penthouse (0)

tcflashguy (Disabled) 01-09-07  05:07pm
Rookie Badge  Pollster TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -No DRM protection
-Zipped files for those picture lovers, also a selection of pixel choice for downloads
-Archives back to 1973
-Live Chat with a variety of models
-Add to your favorites
-Picture updates everyday
-Even videos for people of the go!! ipods and PSP
Cons: -Live chat doesn't seem to work well in firefox, need specific Windows Media Player, if anyone has a solution, let me know.
Bottom Line: If you're into videos, pictures, and/or stories, this is the place to find it. Live chat is nice, because there is live video with sound and the chance to type. The model index is another great way to find exactly who you want, there's even a search feature. I would highly recommend this site to others!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply

*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 51-73 of 73 Page :    < Previous Page

Easy Site Search
Advanced Search

Most Reviews
1. Watch 4 Beauty (1)
2. Sssh.com (1)
3. Hustler (1)

View All : Most Reviews

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.


To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.

Loaded in 0.15 seconds.