Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
Browse Reviews Browse all our reviews with customized filtering and sorting.

Filtering Options Select Option Description
Review Score
Minimum Score:  
Breakdown by min score.
By Niche View only sites in the selected niche.
By Site Type View only sites in the selected site type.
Display Format Maximized  |   List View Change the display format below.
Sort by Date  |   Score  |   Replies Re-sort the reviews by select criteria.

Shown : 26-50 of 71 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Visit XL Girls

26. XL Girls (0)

Pay
Active
80
Darrow (8) 06-10-10  04:49am
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (16), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: 1) This site features all natural, large breasted, really heavy women. There are no skinny women here, but I like women with curves and there are lots of curves here. Most, if not all of these overweight woman are very beautiful.

2)It has a really large selection of photos. There are around 1500 sets; each of them are zipped for easy downloading and there is a good mix of hardcore and softcore material.

3) The video streams since about November 2009 have been decent quality: 480p and 720p.
Cons: 1) The streaming video content since November 2009 is not uniformly high quality. About 6 or 7 are lower quality streams (including two in June 2010).

2) The quality of downloadable videos is quite bad. They are 640 x 360 for both WMV and MP4 files that are somewhat grainy. Not a bother for me as I like streaming, but this would be an issue for others.

3)The older videos are utterly crappy in terms of quality and there has been no move to replace them.

4) The price: TBP lists the price as 39.99 per month recurring and it may be 29.99. This is fairly high for what this site offers. This is a bonus site when you are a member of scoreland for more than one (or maybe two) months. I find scoreland to be worthwhile to keep as a site for extended periods of time, so I get XL girls for free.

5) Updates are a bit slow. You get two or three a week.
Bottom Line: Really good site if you like your women heavy. This is an excellent photosite for looking at pictures and downloading them. In the last year, the site has become excellent for streaming video, but it is still mediocre for donwloadable videos.

Not worth the price as a stand-alone site, however as part of the Scoreland loyalty package it is excellent.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Paul Raymond.xxx

27. Paul Raymond.xxx (0)

Pay
Active
58
Cryton (10) 03-21-10  07:07pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (18), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: A large amount of images
More explicit than Paul Raymond magazines
A good archive of retired models
Classic models in hard or lesbian scenes
Lots of free content if you access the files directly
Cons: Bait and Switch membership and billing
Terrible content organisation
No zip files of images
Non-exclusive content
Image resolution restricted by website design
Streaming Flash video only (no download links)
Poor video resolution, datarate and frame rates
Problems cancelling membership
Bottom Line: Paul Raymond is a famous UK publisher of 'top shelf' pornographic magazines, including Club, Men Only, Razzle, Mayfair, Mensworld and Escort. These form a vast collection of images that date back to 1971 and feature many models who went on to fame and fortune. All this together in one site sounds great, but in practice it's a woeful attempt.

Users are enticed to "Sign Up Now for Free!" for access to model profiles and "XXX videos and pictures". But on the face of it, a free account doesn't gain access to any real content, clicking on an image or video brings up yet another pay to join page in a classic 'bait and switch' tactic.

Once into the site, content is divided up by magazine with the same user-interface for each. Aside from the magazines, there are sections called Escort DVD, Jo Guest and Full Length Videos. There is no model index, no video index and although new additions are listed chronologically, the small thumbnails are cropped and untitled which makes it impossible to learn anything from them. Although each performer does have their own page accessed via a photo set or video, the content is so poorly organised that it's easy to overlook many elements.

Each photograph is presented in a box within the site's layout, and that restricts its resolution. Although the height varies, no image is wider than 720 pixels, and that's poor to say the least. There are no zip file downloads or any easy way to grab a sequence, so downloading an image set is by design a tedious process. The sets themselves also vary considerably, some have as few as five or six photographs, but in many cases they're much harder than you'd see in a Paul Raymond magazine, one area in which the site does deliver. I was surprised to find some content I'd seen elsewhere, a set from MET Art being one example.

Video quality is equally poor although the content itself is varied and features many classic models in hardcore and lesbian scenes. There are no deliberate video download links and streaming Flash is the only viewing option. Recent additions are 480×320 at ~1,750Kbps, but the majority are a woeful 400Kbps and have jerky, low frame rates, many are even the wrong aspect ratio and have interlacing artefacts.

I cancelled my membership after a short period and my access was revoked, but my card was still debited for the following month and now I'm waiting for a refund. Subscriber beware.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Hustler

28. Hustler (1)

Pay
Active
84
slutty (111) 02-18-10  08:51pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge archive of videos
-Many videos actually have stories, albeit most are pretty stupid, it is nice to see this amongst all the drop your pants and fuck kind of sites.
-Many attractive women
-Pretty good download speeds, although somewhat variable given time of day (1MB/sec max, 700KB/sec average)
-Download managers work
-Pictures are pretty decent quality, newer photos are about 1500x1000
-No DRM anymore
-Access to barelylegal.com as well, although a lot of the content on barelylegal is also on Hustler.
-Good quality photography and videography
-Good price with TBP discount
Cons: -Navigation is mediocre. You can sort by star, dvd title, and other things, but with an archive this large it would be nice to have more sorting options and a search ability.
-Navigating for photosets is particularly annoying, very difficult to just browse.
-Video quality is mediocre to poor. The best I downloaded was 640x360 1700kbps. They even commically call some of the videos of this ilk "HD".
-Video quality for older DVDs is poor, as low as 700kbps in highest quality.
-No zips for photosets
-While download managers work, they can be a bit glitchy as the path to files change, so you can only really queue up a few files
-Some videos aren't available for download, most are, it seemed like most of the videos that couldn't be downloaded were newer additions
-Some videos were a bit glitchy - 2 scenes in one, the ending missing, etc.
Bottom Line: I think this site gets somewhat of a bad rap, as historically it was a horrible site with streaming only options and terrible navigation. I think it is much better now than it was in the past (even though the only change I noticed was getting rid of DRM). Maybe I just have a soft spot for Hustler since the first DVDs I ever bought were Barely Legal DVDs.

If they improved the video quality, added some better navigation, and provided zip downloads of photosets this would probably be one of my highest rated sites.

The archive is quite large, 830 DVDs on Hustler, and 346 on barelylegal. Even with some overlap, that is a nice sized archive.

I particularly enjoy the style of many of Hustler's videos and enjoy that many of them have a story - which seems less and less common these days. They appear to also have a large magazine archive, although I didn't have the patience to sort through it.

I would definitely recommend the site for a month, especially for $20/month. Even with the mediocre video quality, I still enjoy a lot of the scenes I downloaded here more than HD content on other sites. I'd be surprised if anyone couldn't find some material they like on this site. However, if you are a fan of photos, this probably isn't the best site to join.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Swank Pass

29. Swank Pass (0)

Network
Newbie
50*
Murkk (2) 02-14-10  02:39pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (12), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros: There are a lot of pictures and videos. Some of the content is exclusive. All of Swanks magazine lineups are there.

One thing that is nice that I wish other sites would do is edit the number of pictures in a set. I swear every new site puts up 200+ pictures, most of which are reduntant.
Cons: The videos and pictures on this site are terrible! I have some 12mb videos that look better. The pictures are terrible.

The search engine is unable to cross reference sites.
Bottom Line: I saw Swankmag as a top site in some porn review website. I checked out the preview, and it looked fairly high quality with some good models and lots of content. After 2 days, I can say I won't dl anything else. This site reminds me of poorly run porn sites back in the 90s.

DO NOT WASTE YOUR MONEY ON THIS SITE!!!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

30. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Active
76
slutty (111) 02-01-10  06:36pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (48), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: *Great variety of content
*Attractive models of all ages, shapes, and sizes
*I believe all of their content is exlusive, although they have released some of it to dvd.
*Good classic videos and classic pictures. The quality wasn't great, but considering the era the content is from I found it pretty good (see below for tech. details)
*Decent download speeds
*Download managers work, although getting to the section to download a video scene can be a bit troublesome - see cons.
*Great for any fan of ladies with actual bush
Cons: *Zips only downloadable if you are a "VIP" which requires a multiple month membership.
*Photo quality is typically pretty poor - 760x540 or so seems pretty typical.
*Video quality is mediocre and in .mov format (720x580 1700 kbps was the best I saw)
*Aweful, aweful navigation. Some of the worst I have seen. The "theatre" section is reminiscent of seventeenvideo's video section. One very small thumb on the right of a random scene in the video (not even always a good view of the model)
*They have an integrated movie player, so you have to load the scene in order to download it - similar to MrSkin, however no matter which browser I used I was unable to "seek" in the video. Maybe it is a Win 7 problem, dunno.
*They recycle content, as is mentioned in the comments section. I'm not sure how much of the "new" material is all that new. I sort of doubt any of it is. One of the videos I downloaded from that section is of a model that left the business in 2003.
Bottom Line: *I know I have a lot of cons, but I think this site is actually pretty good. If you are a fan of Anna, Gigi, Vivian Schmitt or older "classic material" it might be worth joining for a month.
*It is unfortunate that you have to get a multi-month membership in order to download zips. And that navigation and video downloading is so painful. If you join, and want to get your money's worth, I would expect to spend a lot of time digging through the material. When I was looking for videos, I would play video games and look at the videos while waiting for the games to load, since I couldn't seek in the videos I had to wait sometimes a couple of minutes with the video running to find out who was in the scene.
*The site is mostly hardcore with some lesbian.
The best thing about the site, in my opinion, is the wide variety of content. They have content ranging from the old Amsterdam peep shows (1960s or 70s I think) all the way up to the 2000s.
*I must say some of the older material does make one a bit nervous about the models ages, even though the site says it is fully 2257 compliant, you sort of wonder how that can be proven for material produced in the 70s?

If they fixed some of the navagation problems, posted all their content instead of cylcing it, and got rid of the whole "VIP" membership thing I would probably give it a much higher score.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Penthouse

31. Penthouse (0)

Pay
Active
80
mbaya (356) 11-15-09  09:31am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (88), NO (1)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Huge website. See Maggie's review for more details. The archives go back to 1973.
-Nearly every model extremely beautiful. I can't think of a site at this level so consistently.
-Many and I mean many, models have trimmed bush. I found this extremely hot. Since these are the oldest photo sets, most have low quality, but I still appreciated them.
-Quick downloads without restriction if you pay for the gold membership. At the silver level you get only five downloads per day. This option makes no sense on a site of this size.
-All exclusive material of many who went on to become big name models and/or pornstars. The site has some very well known names in exclusive photo sets. For example, Tera Patrick was Pet of the Year.
-Daily updates, sometimes even multiple updates.
Cons: -The photographic style is very much of the glamour type. A lot of artistic shots and not many are explicit. This made me search a lot for what I want to keep.
-Most photo sets are rather small, about a dozen photos each.
-No way to zipdownload the photo sets. I am happy to say there is a way. See Pink Panther's reply. This is one time I am glad to be wrong.
-I prefer videos to photos, so I did not appreciate the low quality of the videos.
-Needs ethnic variety. I saw only one Black model and only a few, maybe six Asian ones.
-Membership ends when you cancel. You don't get the remaining time that you have paid for.
Bottom Line: I rather enjoyed this site. It has so much to offer that I feel confident recommending it. I subscribed to the magazine in the 70"s and loved it then. I still apreciate their style, so trying their website was a natural.

I am more into videos than photos, so this site has a major flaw that keeps me from giving it a score in the 90's. The video quality is too low to watch on a HD television.

However, the pluses here are the consistent beauty of the models, the sheer quantity of the photos and their overall quality-some older photos are of lower size and resolution. The photo sets are solo, masturbation, b/g hardcore and softcore and g/g lesbian and softcore. I saw peeing photo sets, some where the girls were smoking and even some softcore bondage. If you can imagine something, it probably is here somewhere.

For me, another big plus was that since the archive goes back to 1973, there are huge numbers of photos where the models have trimmed bush. I enjoyed this site a LOT more than ATK Hairy, for example.

Just like the magazine, there is a section for erotic letters, an advice section, as well as a forum. Additionally there is a live chat option, a video store and VOD.

If you are into photos and don't care if the videos are weak, this site is one you must try.
Respond: 11 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hustler

32. Hustler (1)

Pay
Newbie
50*
Nick Nxn (4) 08-24-09  02:57pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (5), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Great Content.
Some Exclusive Content.
Navigation was decent.
Cons: Slow download speeds.
Poor customer service.
Downloads didn't work 80% of the time.
Bottom Line: The downloads on this site were slow, and for the most part JUST DIDN'T WORK. It would take 40 minutes to download a video if I was lucky enough for it to finish. Most downloads would get to 90% and just stop. I submitted 3 complaints, but never received a response. I had the 3 month membership and managed to save a total of 26 scenes. Maybe there was something wrong with the settings on my computer, but they never bothered to help me find out. I have several other memberships and never have a problem. I was very disappointed, because if the downloads would have worked (like Videobox) I would probably still be a member.
Respond: 6 Replies - Add Reply - Webmaster Replied!


Visit Color Climax

33. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Newbie
95*
Cooter37 (0) 04-21-09  10:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (3)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: great 70's and 80's pornvideo and pics good qualitylots of content
Cons: video downloads in quicktimewaiting for renew to download more contentprice is a little steep
Bottom Line: If you like classical porn this site is awesome. However you have to wait for your account to renew to download some of the stuff like zip files or newer videos.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Swank Pass

34. Swank Pass (0)

Network
Active
71
Wittyguy (95) 04-08-09  09:06pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 8 member network
+ $6, 3 day full access trial through TBP
+ Probably over 5000 photo sets (1020x680) with zip.
+ Thousands of video scenes
+ No DRM or download limits
+ Cancellation is easy (you know it's bad when this makes it as a "pro")
Cons: - Almost entirely nonexclusive content
- Search engine does not work. Finding anything of value is a royal pain.
- Quality is poor to average
- Majority of pic sets have fewer than 20 pics
- Majority of vids available only as clips
- Each site updates once a week.
Bottom Line: I really was hoping for more when I signed up, thinking that for $6 (I got off cheap) I would find some OK stuff. NOT!!!

Let's start by saying if you have ever been to a Deny DeFranco (DDF) site, Vivthomas, Karupspc, etc. you've seen all there is of value seeing here. All the content from the last few years appears to be shot by these major studios. It wouldn't be so bad but that the quality is worse (downgraded for this network) and often times you don't get the full scene at least for the pics. Some of the oldest material, mostly photos, I don't recognize so I can't say it's all nonexclusive.

Swank (and all the accompanying network sites) are originally magazine based. Like most magazine sites, they seem unable to make a decent leap to the web; unwilling to shake off what they do in print in hopes of actually having long term economic viability. Swank is apparently betting the farm that some fool will spend money on their mags in the future because they're not investing anything here.

You figure with a network the search would be a great way to bring things together. Nope. The search don't work. You can only browse by vids or pics or model directory. Oh yeah, a lot of sets don't have model names attached to them so good luck.

It gets worse because several of the sites have over a thousand pic sets. It gets worse again because some of these sites don't tell you on the pic preview pages how many pics are in a set so it's hunt and peck (some sets 4 pics, some 300: What's behind the curtain Monty?). It's just too exhausting to hunt and peck through the mounds of reheated content to find the occasional gem. While pic sets go back over a decade it's only the last few years of material where the sets have more than 20 pics per set. Guess what, some of the network sites won't even tell you what year the set was published ... more hunt and peck for gems ... more swearing. Oh yeah, some of the pics only max at 800 pixels despite the fact you click on the icon for large photos. Most of the content is solo, while there is more hc in the last year or two of updates.

The vids max out at 640x480. Some sites having nothing but clips available. Some are about evenly split between full length and clips. Again, all is nonexclusive and average to good quality. About the only good thing is that most of the vids appear to be hardcore.

About half the sites cater to big boobs. Otherwise the models are all over the radar from pornstars to amateurs. The solo model pics tend to be more glam oriented harkening to the magazine theme at work here. There is no content from the mags though besides the pics.

The only reason I can score this in the 70's is because they have a mountain of content and because they still have acceptable pic and video sizes. Don't waste your money even on the trial. Save your pennies and pay a little extra to see the original stuff in mint condition at the sites that sell Swank their material.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Leg Action

35. Leg Action (0)

Pay
Active
71
Wittyguy (95) 04-08-09  05:29pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: + 3 day full access trial for $6 through TBP
+ Full access to 8 other sites (Swankpass network)
+ 960 photo shoots and 343 vids
+ Zip download available
+ No download limits or DRM
+ Smallish watermarks
Cons: - Search function doesn't work & no model directory
- Pic sizes max out at 1020 x 680
- Vids max out at 640 x 480
- About 50% of vids downloadable in clips only
- Mostly nonexclusive contact
- Updates about once a week
Bottom Line: For the price I figured this one was worth a trial. I figured it wouldn't be HotlegsandFeet but I was still hopeful of getting some decent leg shots. As they say "hope springs eternal" ... and this site is just another mediocre pit stop on that long eternal road.

Legaction started as a magazine (the other 8 network sites are also mag oriented). These sites never seem to have their act together enough put out a quality web based product and this one is no different.

Most of this stuff is nonexlusive as they farmed out a lot of the photography. For the hardcore stuff, most of this comes from Deny DiFranco (DDF) so if you've been to his sites recently skip this place. The rest of the hc is stuff you've probably already seen on other mega sites. The solo material has more stuff I haven't seen before but I can't vouch for exclusivity.

The girls here range from known pornstars to amateurs to milfs. The quality of the sets/scenes varies greatly from poor to good.

Pictures: As I said, pics max out at 1020 x 680. The photo archieves date back to 1997 but the sets prior to 2006 are crap. You get about 8 - 16 shots per set there (aka: worthless). The newer stuff spreads out to about 60 to 250 shots. Unfotunately, most of the good stuff (aka newer) is also the stuff you've probably seen already. The quality is average (nothing HQ about it). Most of the pics are solo with about 25% being HC and lez.

Video: There is only a couple years worth of video but only half have full length downloads available. The full downloads range from about 20 to 90 minutes. You can download in wmv, ipod or watch in flash. The older clip based stuff is strange in that you get 3 or 4 short clips with the last clip having most of the content and length. Again, you've probably seen a lot of this stuff from the DDF sites and other megasites. Quality is so-so; the full length clips at, say, 40 minutes long only come in at about 250 mb in file size. About half the vids are HC and the rest solo or lez.

The search function looks good but it doesn't work. You can only search under vids or pics and even then the layout is random, not by date. A lot of models, especially in the pics, have only a first name or no name at all or a "wrong" name so good luck there. There is a model directory.

As a bonus you get a slew of crappy 3rd party streaming feeds that I thought went extinct years ago (thus providing proof of "nonintelligent design" at this site): When's the last time you've seen a streaming vids options at 56k, 128k or 250k? The 8 other network sites are similar to here but have their own content and niches.

As another mild downer, when I ran my card the confirmation page didn't appear. Thus, I had to venture to my email to confirm everything.

Basically, for you leg lovers this site is more like a hamhock then a beautiful gam. The only reason this one scores in the 70's is because of the volume of content and network availability.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perfect 10

36. Perfect 10 (0)

Pay
Active
65
Xororos (14) 03-31-09  08:40pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (23), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: Perfect 10 is something like a British Playboy, although the models appear slightly more natural. You won't find any fake breasts here. The pictures are colorful and appealing, and the content is very soft. It's essentially "wholesome," but with a slightly naughty edge. In that sense, it's a lot like what Playboy used to be - the all American girl next door, who was secretly a raging sex kitten.
Cons: The pictures are small and there are no zip files. Theoretically, if zip files were available, you could download the entire site in a couple days. However, there is a ridiculous download limit imposed, so you actually can't download all the content right away.

Some may think the content is much too soft. Some of the models are merely topless. Personally, I enjoy softcore of this nature, but it's important to understand that this is very very soft stuff.

I've subscribed twice. Strangely, some of the content from my first membership disappeared when I returned a year later. I have no idea why a website with such limited content would actually *remove* pictures, but they did.
Bottom Line: My recommendation is to choose the trial subscription to see if you like it. Just be warned: only look at the stuff you're definitely interested in because once you hit the download limit, that's it.

Ultimately, I cannot recommend purchasing a regular subscription. It's not like the site updates, so there isn't a nice stream of new content. It does softcore modeling very well, but considering the small picture size, lack of updates, and lack of zip files, it's not worth a month's subscription.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Perfect 10

37. Perfect 10 (0)

Pay
Active
59
james4096 (126) 03-16-09  04:38pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (54), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Very nice professional photography.
- The girls are beautiful.
- Every model on the site is all natural. No implants.
- A large quantity of models.
Cons: - Basically no video content.
- The photo resolution could be better (680x1024).
- The navigation is poor, and no search function.
- No zip downloads of photos.
- The site could use a facelift.
- No bonus content. Just a few candid photos of events.
Bottom Line: Perfect 10 is the website of the now out of print magazine of the same name. The site consists of mostly Eastern European models photographed tastefully topless(no pussy).

This is a photo only site, the link to "videos" leads you to a store where you can order DVD's. The "video cams" link takes you to 5 videos of boxing matches between some of the models and an interview of each of the fights participants. -- And it's streaming video, no downloads.

The resolution of the photos could have been better considering that this is a photo site. They don't give you many photos per model/shoot either, just 1 page of select photos. That is not a terrible thing because usually you get tons of pics that are practically the same or crap.

It was also hard to navigate the site. You could only browse alphabetically and you couldn't even go to a certain page, just next or previous.

I believe the site is still being updated, but how often and when, I cannot say.

While the models look great and the photgraphy is top notch, I cannot recommend this site at all. It's not even worth the 2.95 3-day trial price.
The site could work if they offered super hi-rez photos, some behind the scenes videos, and a search function.
Respond: 4 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Hustler

38. Hustler (1)

Pay
Active
70
TrashMan (Disabled) 01-24-09  04:57pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: +Site interface has been improved over time
+Higher availability of studio movies than other studios make available on their sites (e.g. Vivid, DevilsFilm, etc.)
+Multiple formats, WMV, RM and QT (Quicktime is actually just MPG with the QT player)
+Three qualities, low, med and high (128, 384 and 768kbps)
+Videos provide download links, but...(see cons)
+Includes images sets from Hustler magazine issues, including centerfolds.
+$15/mo promo for Dvdbox, although TBP gives you this too
+Bonus Hustler3D game - based on Thrixxx's Jenna Jameson game
+Update schedule decent, but... (see cons)
+Newer movies list entire cast but...(see cons)
+Pornstar list, but...(see cons)
+List of all movies SERIES available (key word: series). They do a darn good job of adding all the movies to a certain series. Yes, they do miss one here and there, but they do a better job of SERIES completion than VideoBox or the sort.
+Movies are categorized by type as well
Cons: -Downloads do not work with download managers
-Downloads have DRM
-They disable right-click in certain areas of the page.
-Image sets not available as ZIPs
-No updates for 2009 yet. Last movie update was Dec 26.
-A lot of the older movies do not have cast lists
-Pornstar list is just that, a list. No headshot gallery or anything, no letter-by-letter list.
-Updates page only go back a month or two at most.
-Only 14 movies added per month - compare against 150 for videobox, 180 for videosz, etc. However that number will be going down for a bit as there have been no updates for 2009 yet.
-The newer movies label the scenes with the girl names, but the majority of the content (because it was added long ago) is not labeled, rather with a generic scene title - meaning you have to stream every scene to find the one you want.
-Newer movies have HQ at 720x480, but older movies, which make up most of the content, have HQ at 320x240, same as med quality.
-No preview images for ANY movie or scene
Bottom Line: Overall it is an OK site. I put it on the same level as Ten.com (a site I reviewed previously). It feels the same, but that is just my opinion. However Ten.com is better in the sense that they remastered their ENTIRE archive and removed DRM. It is a joke that there are still sites out there which use DRM, and Hustler is one of them.

Now, it is important to point out that the downloads are the only thing with DRM. The streams are not DRM - mind you that RM and MPG (the Quicktime option is straight up MPG) can't be DRM'd - so thats good. But what really irks me is that they are HIDING the non-DRM WMV downloads. The download links for the DRM WMV's are something like (these aren't actual links, just a generic example to make a point):
www.hustler.com/drm/movie.wmv
And if you just change the link to
www.hustler.com/wmv/movie.wmv
you get the non-DRM WMV.

I can't stand when sites blatantly hide content from the users. DRM is an abomination, and porn sites which used to use it have removed it (e.g. VideosZ, Ten.com, etc.). Hustler continues to use it while hiding the real goods without DRM. So where you have sites like Ten.com which went out of their way to remaster their content and remove the DRM, Hustler does not have to do any work but make their non-DRM content available to users. Just takes a few clicks of the mouse, no extra encoding (or de-DRM'ing) required.
I was ready to give this site an 80, but I docked 10 points for the DRM and for hiding the non-DRM content.

Some of the other major rating decreases come from:
*Lack of update history - yes, you can see the last 1-2 months of updates but if you don't visit the site for more than 2 months you are shit outta luck.
*The older movies, which make up the majority of the content, have no cast list, do not label the scenes with the girl names, and have no preview images (no movies have preview images for that matter), so you have to use other sites like IAFD to determine what movie and what scene you are looking for. This is unacceptable for a DVD site.
*Image sets not available as ZIPs.

The regular price is $35/mo, but the TBP price is $20/mo. $20 is still rather expensive, especially for a site continuing to use DRM. Must miss? Eh, no other site leases Hustler content, so in essence, no. Just be aware of what you are getting when you sign up...DRM'd, low quality downloads.
Respond: 5 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Shades Of Brown

39. Shades Of Brown (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
DudeWithDick (2) 01-11-09  10:10am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (3), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Billing company does not apply localization to membership price, ie. 15.95USD does not magically transform into 15.95EUR if you live in Europe.
-Some sexy models.
Cons: -Mostly non-nude. Very few models show boobs.
-Only pics, no videos.
-Small pics on older series (530x798px). Recent pics are not that huge either (930x1395px for a series dated 16 DEC 2008).
-Lame model poses in many series: front standing, front squatting, side standing, side squatting, etc... you get the idea.
-Many uninspired settings (single-color background), and poor photographer (static camera on a stand, and two zoom levels).
-No way of saving content easily due to strong anti-crawling security: I couldn't crawl this site at all using PictureRipper or TeleportPro.
-Series are not downloadable in zip files.
Bottom Line: I do not recommend this website at all!
Even though membership price is relatively inexpensive at 15.95 USD, the low amount of content, uninspired poses and settings, smallish pics, inability to save content, slow loading, etc. make this a website to be avoided!
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Watch 4 Beauty

40. Watch 4 Beauty (2)

Pay
Active
92
Mr Fountain (50) 01-06-09  06:57pm
Rookie Badge  Trusted User TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: #fabulous artistic magazine photosets that are vibrant in color and a breath of fresh air from plain nude sites.
# the art amplifies the seductive quality of the photosets; really have to see some examples for yourself- hard to explain really.
#gorgeous models
#620 issues, 31,754 photos, 100 video clips, and 131 models
# on top of included above: bonus memberships for Nikkysdreams, Verunkasdreams, Ambrasdreams, and Monikasdreams.com
#new photoset every 2 days; with update of some kind (jokes, video, photoset) everyday.
#new hi def video every week (3-6 minutes)
#6 month member get glossy full color book of 50 models; 1 year members get invited backstage to a photoshoot (in the Czech Republic)!
#Unlimited downloads; PDF and zip files for download
# apart from the art; there are simple and beautiful beach photoshoots; models in bikinis and lingerie; and themes such as dominatrix.
# most photosets have backstage videos
# 1200, 2000, and 5616/ 4992; pix sizes
Cons: # not a volume site; most photosets will have 50- 80 pics; with some going much further than that into the 100's

# large magazine style avatars slows down navigation

#not really an international; multi ethnic site

# this site is pretty big on special effects; so if you are looking for just a straight nude shoot without any manipulations- you probably won't like a majority of this site.

# some models only have one shoot...
Bottom Line: Watch 4 Beauty uses artisic manipulations with their photoshoots and vids to enhance and amplify the erotic appeal of their sets...a refreshing and erotic respite away from traditional plain 'vanilla' nude sites.

I see why they jokingly keep mentioning in their porn comic section how you are going to blow your load to their gorgeous models and well done photoshoots. I read a few of them before I joined and laughed at a few of them. Their stunning photosets made me gasp and I ended up blowing out some hard loads myself when it was all said and done- just as advertised. Melisa in Sundown was one of the first sets I looked at. WOW.. anyone who looks at that set will love W4B!


These are highly seductive photosets that have as many backgroundable quality pictures per set than I have seen. These are calendar style pics....

mesmerizing is what I would describe it W4B. Just images that I background and stare at on my large flat screen monitor. You get Hi rez pics of shoots with models in front of absolutely stunning sunsets and waterfalls; Studio shoots where models pose on brightly colored couches; there are all sorts of background fades; lighting effects; and vibrant colors that really looks great on my monitor. There are photshoots in expensive cars; lesbians making out in pools; The picture quality is some of the best that I have seen...and I have been around the block with nude sites.

and Watch 4 Beauty offers the perks that are definately unique and worth looking into. A big glossy book for 6 month members and an invitation to see a behind the scenes photoshoot live seems unheard of for a porn site.

The bonus sites will give you access to this:

Nikkisdreams: 28 photosets; 3 vids; and wallpapers; Verunkasdreams: 44 photosets; 8 videos; and wallpapers; Ambrasdreams.com; 33 photosets; 7 videos; and wallpapers;Monikasdreams; 24 photosets; 6 videos; and wallpapers.

I would say that Watch 4 Beauty offers more useable pics. I know that W4B still is not as big as some other nude sites; but I spend a lot less time thumbing through repetitve pics like the other nude sites and a lot more time in each individual set because they are simply stunning shoots and the Czech models are gorgeous. I have spent 45 minutes in one set a few days ago. It was one of Gwens photoshoots.

I recommend Watch 4 Beauty for any nude site lover. It is a must join at least once; it is significantly different from other nude sites in a stunning and erotic way. You really have to look at a few samples and see for yourself to see if this is for you; but it is not one of those tours that the tour looks better than the site. Watch 4 Beauty is the real deal.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Swank Pass

41. Swank Pass (0)

Network
Active
60
TrashMan (Disabled) 01-06-09  03:21pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (39), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: +No DRM
+Videos available in full or split downloads
+Excellent download speeds
+Network of sites is kept up to date
+HQ photos available
+Videos are super high quality - 640x480 @ 1.4mbps (total bitrate).
+Site works with all download managers.
+I guess there are a lot of videos if you add up all the videos from the sites (something like 2000)
Cons: -Swankpass.com main site nothing more than links to login pages for all network sites
-All sites use the same login information, but you are required to login to each site using a form and image verification. Very annoying.
-Half the videos are titled with performer name(s), the other half are titled with a two word description
-Photos and videos not linked. You click a video and you see just the videos and no associated pictures, and yet when you goto pictures page you will never find associated pictures. In other words it seems that the videos are random, as are the pictures.
-A couple of the network sites specialize in a certain fetish (D-cup girls, mostly legs, etc.) but the rest I can't find any actual difference in genre of content. Might as well just be one huge site
-Videos not original. Definitely seen the videos in DVDs on Videobox, or offered from other sites.
-Videos are just named "full.wmv" or the sort, no descriptive names.
-Update schedule is poor (see below)
-No Search
Bottom Line: I rate this site as must-miss. There are some nice pros, but the cons heavily outweigh the pros. I'd say the thing that places this site deeply into the must-miss category is the fact that I have seen a lot of these videos before, either on VideoBox or similar sites (meaning a lot of the videos come from quality DVDs) or on DDF sites like 1By-Day. In other words, I'd say near 100% (if not 100%) of the videos are not original. So they are basically asking $29.95/mo for a bunch of rehashed scenes, for a library that is updated in some cockamamie schedule.

About that update schedule. Yeah, the videos are all tagged with dates, but the schedule at which they are update is constant for some sites but variable for others, one period for one, another period for another, overall a very poor schedule regardless. So for one site, the schedule may appear to be something like 1 video per WEEK (read that, WEEK), but another site looks more like 1 per MONTH, and another site averages out to like 2 per MONTH. None of sites do any better than 1 video per WEEK, none. So I guess if you added up all the sites it MIGHT work out to one video per day, but I doubt that (I didn't have the desire to count it) considering that, as I said earlier, the update schedule is variable (one month it'll look like 1 update per week, another month it'll look like 1 update per 2 weeks, etc.). Include the fact that they provide NO information about updates to any of the network sites. This forces you to visit every site, every day, logging into everyone of them, just to see if there are updates. Who the hell wants to do that???

There is not one redeeming this I can find about this site. There is no bonus material (they call their network sites bonus material but its part of the network for crying out loud!), nothing is original, videos have no file names, update schedule is poor, photos are not linked with videos, etc. etc. Again, if you missed it above, this site is a MUST-MISS.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

42. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Active
85
EroticShot (18) 12-21-08  08:09am
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (13), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros: I was a member of this site for 6-8 months - the key is here is their loyalty program. I got in at a promotional pricing of $14.95 or $19.95 (not sure) - each month I would get access to 1 more site. You can't choose just any site - they give you 5 or 6 choices each month - the site you really, really want may not be on that list until the following month.

ScoreLand is a huge site. It's a large part of the Score Group's archive of content - which like Big Top Cinema or Pussyman, vivid, etc - shot and filmed a lot, a lot of content. The focus here is on large-bust models. You have video content in all their subdivisions like Naughty Newbies, Voluptuous (large women), etc. You can spend days on end here and not get through all the content.

Videos easily number into the hundreds - perhaps 300+ at 100megs all in all. Photoshoots are extensive as well - I don't remember particularly easy downloads for any of it. Not sure about zip files for images.
Cons: Layout, organization is poor. Downloads can be slow and are not easy to do en-masse. You have to work a bit to get the content down.
Bottom Line: Go for the loyalty program.
Go because there are a few models that you love and want to see their work here.
You can look up most content on Scoreland by model (or go to google and play around with xx model and scoreland.com in the search) - you can see most of the specific content before signing up.

Scoreland is unique in that this is THEIR content from 2-3 decades of filming and work. It doesn't get better if you like big bust.

Want higher quality - Go to danni.com (HOTBOX) or Suze.net (Suze Randall). Danni has the big bust queens as well.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 40 Something Mag

43. 40 Something Mag (0)

Pay
Active
50
spacenick (5) 11-20-08  04:17pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (11), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Original Models to the site but...
Cons: Large Watermarks. Site is prone to crash browsers. Downloading must be done at one time and will not resume, better to use a downloading manager over a built-in browser downloader as site will crash browser. Original models but quantity is lacking, the photo's "editors choice" is lacking in quantity and quality. There are a lot of additional content but all of it transfers you to a another site to sign up for other sites. It seems that a lot of content is offered at other sites and only some intro material/content is on this actual site.
Bottom Line: Don't bother. Site is very unfriendly and wants to keep its content "exclusive" by unstable website code and extra-large watermarks.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Color Climax

44. Color Climax (0)

Pay
Newbie
75*
f84815 (4) 11-10-08  03:53pm
Pollster  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (10), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -Classic Porn from my youth
-Quality, average against new porn, but not bad compared with similar stuff.
Cons: -only Quicktime and mp4 video type.
-No download manager support.
-No regular updates, while I've be a member 1 update
Bottom Line: If you like older stuff vids and pic then join for a month. It isn't worth much more than that.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Swank Mag

45. Swank Mag (0)

Pay
Active
75
xbigvmanx (14) 10-31-08  01:28pm
Rookie Badge  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (20), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros: 7 website for the price of one
Cons: Video quality could use improvement
Interactive interface
Bottom Line: When I turned 18, I bought my first Swank magazine. What I loved about it are the pictures had some of the best photographers back in the day like Suze Randal, Earl Miller etc just to name a few. I have over 300 issues all properly bagged in my box. Almost 15 years later I finally decided to try an online perspective of my favorite magazine and I have to say I was a bit disappointed. So lets start off with the good stuff. The majority of the videos are hardcore. You get a pretty decent package of 7 websites to navigate thru which are Just 18, Velvet, Gent and D-cup to name a few all are magazines in their own right and are a part of the Swank infrastructure. The content is pretty decent of what your paying for which is all there is to say on the good part. Now the bad part is a disappoinntment especially a long time Swank fan like me. The videos a a little grainy I am surprised they having used the dvd movies they have on the market for this website, finding your favorite model with a different alias can be confusing, so navigation between websites can also be confusing when your trying to find out what is a really worth your time to download. If I had to recommend swank to anyone I would just recommend you subscribe to the magazine instead of this website. I am actually being nice to give them a 75 just because I was a fan their publication.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit 18 Eighteen

46. 18 Eighteen (0)

Pay
Active
82
Wittyguy (95) 10-24-08  05:44pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (59), NO (0)
Status: Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros: + Almost all exclusive material focusing on the "teen" niche with 7 years of material available
+ No DRM
+ All pics come in 1600x1060 format with zips
+ Updates 5 days a week
+ Good $3 3 day full trial and $20 monthly membership through TBP
Cons: - Navigation is a pain but tolerable
- Primarily a photo site but there vids available
- Cancellation can be an adventure keep your sign up info on hand when you do cancel
- Some advertising on site to buy their products
- Older vids are very big and some only come in clips
- Inconsistent image sizes when you zip download
Bottom Line: 18Eighteen.com is proof once again that abstinence only education does not work. 18Eighteen started out as a magazine and apparently continues as such as well as the website. Like most porn magazines, they haven't fully embraced the on-line aspects and as such the site does suffer a bit.

Navigation is a pain in the butt. There is a model directory but it is pretty bare bones and offers no real preview of whats available. Most of the images are in the monthly magazine section. You get about 9-12 updates a month there. You have to click on each model to see what their set contains. Then they have other sections where updates are sometimes posted. You really have to dig through the whole site to find everything.

All the models have photo sets with the large pics. Like others have noted, if you do a zip on the older material you might get something smaller than 1600x1060. That seems to have been fixed with the newest postings. I thought the images were mostly good quality although some of the older stuff gets grainy in the large size. I did notice a couple of dead links on the images.

The models are not glam, for the most part they are attractive teens. Most of the material is softcore with some dildo action and you get about 4 or 5 exclusivee hardcore sets per month.

You also get access to the now expired Babyface mag images which are mostly softcore. Their achieve goes back to 2001 with Babyface only having about 16 months (100 models) worth of material.

Like I said this site isn't really about the vids. Download speeds were just OK but the older vids sometimes only offered clips and came in at 320x240 on wmp. The newest vids come in at 640x480 but the majority are in the smaller range. There are probably around 100 vids and dvds, maybe more.

I have been a member here numerous times in the past before they jacked their fees and excluded the full trial last year. It's good to see this discounts back. Cancelling was a little strange. My info was not listed on the processor site and I had to cancel through the website itself. I did not get a cancellation confirmation email until the next day. A little strange but it worked.

I like the fact that the teens are cute and natural (no plastic here) and the production value is pretty good. It's almost all exclusive and, being a picture lover, this is good site in my book. If you've never been you could probably get all you wanted through a couple of trial joins but at $20 a month that wouldn't be bad either. It's not worth staying for more than a month unless you're a really big fan of the content.

I would score this site in the high 80's if they got their their navigation fixed, fixed some of the technical problems and had more movies available in the larger size. A very good site to check out on the trial though.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Just 18

47. Just 18 (0)

Pay
Newbie
71*
blueascanbe (0) 09-12-08  03:25pm
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (2), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Ok Material, a few good photo sets, a few good videos.
Cheap $5 trial. Now they are giving full access, in the trial offer.
Cons: Horrible customer support. Tricky to cancel. I also was automatically "Signed up" for who knows what, and charged $29.95 for it!
Very difficult to find the billing service.
No Membership # was included in confirmation e-mail.
No Cancellation info was given in confirmation e-mail.
No Info was given, at all, for the one extra site trial, of 'allnetworkpass' for 2.95. No confirmation e-mail, no password information, no cancellation information , no membership ID #.
How the heck are you supposed to cancel?
Bottom Line: I would not recommend this site to anyone! Bad site!
Horrible customer support. I even was charged an additional $29.95 for I know not what!.
I cannot even find out what I was charged the extra 29.95 for.
None of their many,(and I mean MANY) billing support sites can give me any help.
Bottom line. Avoid this illegit and fraudulent site at all costs.
There are wayyyyy better sites out there, that have good customer support, like New Sensations or Teen Dreams or MET.
Respond: 1 Reply - Add Reply


Visit Naughty Mag

48. Naughty Mag (0)

Pay
Newbie
50*
naughtyTruth (2) 09-09-08  08:51am
No Badges TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: Has a large assortment of pictures and stories available to kill time while downloading. Plenty of advertisements for other sites that is affiliated with the Score Group.

There is plenty of reading material, but no images to really go along with it.

Picture sets are huge. There is a large variety of models available.

An archive is available for you to go through that dates back to 2000. Unfortunately there isn't a search function on the website, but you can narrow each archived monthly section into hardcore, solo, or softcore.
Cons: NaughtyMag is simply an advertisement for some of the Score Group websites. There is about 30 scene sets total. Each scene can be found on one of the other websites owned by the score group. You do not get access to those other sites without a completely separate subscription.

The videos have average resolution and some are just outright poor overall. There isn't much variety for the vids. There is mature 30s and up, teens, orgies, security cam, casting couch and a few others. Each section contains anywhere from 3-8 sets, mostly solo softcore.
Bottom Line: The website subscription is 29.95 for 30 days or 49.95 for 90 days.

If your search is for videos, this site isn't for you.

Compared to other amateur websites this one isn't worth it. You get a lot of tease because a lot of the videos are on the other Score Group websites that are site-exclusive and requires a mandatory separate subscription.

Consider NaughtyMag as just an advertisement for the other websites. You'll be severely disappointed when you find that some videos that are advertised on the site can only be accessed from another site you have to buy a subscription to.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Scoreland

49. Scoreland (0)

Pay
Active
82
xyzzy (11) 07-29-08  12:42pm
Rookie Badge TRUST USER?   YES (14), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: - Well-established name in the industry. You know what content you're getting with this site!
- Large model archive, including both natural breasts and silicone-pumped monsters
- Updated nearly every day!
- Good selection of videos and photos, with different resolution offers
- Rewards loyalty; you receive extra sites added to your account the longer you stay, featuring more exclusive content. This is a great idea.
- photo and video clarity is good; even the gonzo-style shoots feel professional and well-shot
Cons: - Site can be a pain to navigate. Way too many options, menus, etc. Some links don't work or crash. Pages are not consistent; some photoshoots have a completely different layout to others.
- maximum of 6 downloads at once
- It's just what you'd expect from reading the magazine. All the photos have pretty much the same style, the language is the same..etc. A little bit of variety would help.
- Scoreland don't choose models for their beauty, but for their bustline. Some of them are just, well, ugly. Sorry girls.
- Varying content on each model. You may browse and find a model you like, only to discover she only has one bad photoset, from 1998.
- Download speed isn't great, for me in the UK. I have a 2Mb/s connection, but sometimes was barely getting 48kb/s, and never more than 500kb/s
- no complete archive of the Score magazines, which I would have liked to see.
Bottom Line: So, if you're a fan of big boobs, Scoreland is obviously the place to be. They've been going for decades now in print, producing the same kind of professional-quality boob pictorials ever since the beginning.

I'd say it's definitely worth giving the site a try. There's a large collection of models (albeit some have very little content), new updates every day or so, and loads of content. And the way that they give you an extra site every few weeks is awesome, it's a great incentive to stay.

The biggest problem with the site is that it just gets boring after a while. Everything looks the same; the models all use the same poses; the lighting doesn't vary much. Even the hardcore all seems vaguely similar. You find yourself watching the vids and thinking, "why didn't they just change the formula a bit?"

I ended up just going through the model list, picking the models I liked the look of, and downloading their content. I barely glanced at the homepage or updates, which is a bad sign.

Don't get me wrong, it's still a professional, entertaining site with great content and regular updates, and it's a must-subscribe if you're a breast fanatic, even if it's just for a month. But after a while, it all just looks the same.
Respond: 0 Replies - Add Reply


Visit Naughty Mag

50. Naughty Mag (0)

Pay
Active
87
WeeWillyWinky (88) 04-07-08  11:20pm
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Pollster  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (52), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: - Half a million pics+, and lots of video.
- One of the widest ranges of models I've seen, from 18+ to late 60s, from extremely plain to beautiful.
- zips in two sizes.
- choice of size for pictures.
- model index and search function.
- I find the navigation to be easy, because I'm used to it. See cons.
- Access to multiple mag archives: 40+, 30+, Eighteen18, Newcummers, Naughty Neighbors.
Cons: - Pic quality is not top-notch.
- Lots of *very* plain models.
- toys & dildos everywhere.
- Navigation takes some getting used to.
Bottom Line: Naughtymag is noteworthy because of the amount of content it now has and for the range of tastes it caters to. I haven't seen this wide a variety of model types at any other site, though ATK's Natural and Hairy comes close. The focus is on amateur, accessible, next-door-neighbor types. I actually find a good percentage of the models here downright homely (I'm being kind), but that's all part of the amateur niche. That being said, there are many beautiful ladies to look at as well, though the atmosphere is never super-glamorous.

While the pictures have that "magazine-y" look to them, I have to say that the majority of the pics ranging from 2003 to present look pretty good, and some are very good. The lack of clarity is compensated for by the fact that the sets are well-edited and comprehensive. I find that most sets show the models in all the ways I like to see them, without excessive shots of the same pose with barely noticeable differences.

The vids I looked at are 640X480, 2000+ kbps. These are the newer "casting couch" or interview vids and they look excellent.

I would certainly recommend this site to picture collectors, and amateur pictures in particular, but not to those who are interested in photography as art. This ain't art, it's naughty pictures. People mainly into video are best advised to look elsewhere.

It's too bad this company is crapping out on their trials. Why they would want to damage their rep in this way is a mystery to me.
Respond: 3 Replies - Add Reply


*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.

Shown : 26-50 of 71 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >


Easy Site Search
Advanced Search


Most Reviews
1. Watch 4 Beauty (2)
2. Playboy Plus (2)
3. Sssh.com (1)
4. Hustler (1)

View All : Most Reviews



Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.


Loaded in 0.22 seconds.