Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
True to its Lesbian Theme.
Original contents with mostly attractive elderly and young ladies.
Updates regularly.
Excellent quality in newer videos, going as high as 1920 x 1080p in wmv and h264 format, with a total bitrate of over 8000 kbps.
Excellent picture quality, now in High Resolution
4288 x 2848px. The sets usually follow the action of the video but are NOT vidcaps. There are also many solo shots of the individual models included.
Excellent download speed for me at 3.5 MB/s.
Part of a large network (21Sextury).
Cons:
At present only 55 scenes are listed. The site was established in May 2010 and while updates are regular they come only once a week.
Only 62 models, young and old.
Some of the older scenes listed in this site were originally published in "Lusty Grandmas."
Bottom Line:
Quite frankly I am enjoying sites like these with its mature ladies who would not win a beauty contest but give me the feeling instead that they could be my elderly neighbor next door. Anyone who likes glamor and glitz would not enjoy this site. Anyone for whom forty years old is ancient, might as well stay away but I enjoy the company of my peers!
In the past I had taken 21Sextury to task for being so neglectful when it came to their sites that featured very mature women, because most hadn't been updated in years, which left me with only "Lusty Grandmas."
But now I am willing to give this site a score over 80, not only for its quality material, but also as a thank you to 21Sextury for adding it to my line up of sites.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Nearly 200 scenes.
-Authentic Grandma looking performers.
-They have both BG/GG scenes.
-Video download options are among the best on the net with WMV and H.264 both at different levels of quality from low to high.
-Photosets can be downloaded whole in zip format.
-Immediate acess to 30 sites from the 21Sextury
Cons:
-The fact that most of their performers truly look like grandmas can be a serious turn off.
-The new network is a little slower than the original (They may still be in the beta stage).
Bottom Line:
I didn't join LustyGrandmas but got access with my pix and video membership. I did download a couple of scene, but this truly isn't one of my fetishes. Many of the older performers really look like grandmas. They are much older than a typical cougar, they have higher body fat, many have sagging breast, many have greying hair, and to be honest most are way past their prime and quite a few never had one.
If the above body type appeals to you then this is your site. For the others I'd recommend a quick visit. I'm more of the later so my score is in part because of my lack of interest in this site.
Of course you get quite a few other great sites with your membership so even if this one doesn't appeal to you. The fact that many of the others in the network do might be a great incentive to join. I've noticed that you don't get the same access with each membership so I recommend you always take a look at which site come wqith the mebership and then pick that site knowing you want the other in the network.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+They have exclusif content from a niche that's not well represented on the net.
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file. All the others are broken into 2 or more files.
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
Cons:
-They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.
-They don't offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.
-They don't date their content so it's very hard to know the update schedule.
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order. Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren't in a complete zip file.
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.
-There's music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be distracting.
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
Bottom Line:
*This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it. They don't have a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.
*There's dialogue in some of the videos and it's normally in English. It's more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it's not awful. The music is a little annoying. It's not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn't be sad if it disapeared. I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.
*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720. Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they'll have improved on most key issues.
**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that. They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you'll find a few videos. Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you'll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.
***Of course if you don't want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site. Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
09-26-0810:31am (Update History) Reason: Eight of the bonus sites no longer update. Main reason for downgrading: I am being flooded with Spam since I subscribed to this site.
Pros:
Site sticks strictly to its niche. Plenty of real grandmas who look the part, each having at least one high quality picture set (1280x857) zipped and one very high quality video just short of HD.
Recent videos are primarily in wmv format and can be downloaded in whole in a zip file or in segments.
No DRM protection.
Download speed is fast at 1.2 MB/s.
Lusty Grandmas is part of a network. With the first month's subscription 34 other sites are now included catering to every taste. The number of bonus sites will be increased by two every additional month one subscribes while the price drops from $ 29,95 to $ 24.95 after the first month. Both are offered as a loyalty bonus. In addition two HD sites are promised down the road if one stays with Lusty Grandmas.
Amazingly enough in the light of past, bad experiences, the 34 bonus sites one receives seem to be of high quality (no time to test all) with lots of good material and not just low grade fillers to make the network look good.
Cons:
The picture sets basically repeat what's on the video. They are of excellent quality but it would still be nice to have a picture set that is different from the video.
Updates come daily but I have problems with them coming in segments over a period of time. It amounts more to one update a week than a daily one, but with so many sites to pick from one never gets bored waiting for the next segment so that's a smallish "con."
Video scenarios are a bit repetitive and hard to understand at times because many of the models are Eastern Europeans whose English is not very good. Some videos even use interpreters.
That dratted security sign-in! Yep, the one that's so hard to make out in most places.
Epoch handles the subscription, which is good, but beware of a pre-checked free trial offer to another site when you sign up. You may not want it!
Bottom Line:
In my efforts to get away from the perfect, powdered or oiled, fake breasted Barbies I strayed into new and unfamiliar territory but I must say that I like it because it is so dramatically different.
The models of Lusty Grandmas are not glamorous, they are not MILFs but rather the mothers of MILFs, most could not be called beautiful by any stretch of the imagination, but I like them .. a lot .. and for those of you who like glamor and glitz and nubile, you can always ignore this site and enjoy the other thirty_four.
There is a wealth of good material in them with at least a couple of sites to suit your taste.
This "mother" or should I say "grandmother" site makes it easy to sample some of the material. Go, have a look at the quality of the videos and pictures for yourself as you take their tour.
What you see is pretty well what you'll get in all (most? because I haven't looked at them all) of the sites when it comes to quality.
Another big plus I couldn't fit in above is the fact that no other sign-in but the first is required to cruise this net of sites.
-Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.
Cons:
-Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.
Bottom Line:
I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.
In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.
In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.
More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.
I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.
This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Solid niche site with 233+ scenes
+ weekly update
+ top quality technical specifications of content (see bottom line)
+ part of a vast network
+ content can be filtered, ordered and searched
+ user can chose between three formats for streaming and up to six formats for downloading videos (see bottom line)
+ HighQuality photo shootings for every scene, available in two formats and ZIP-folders
Cons:
- Scenes might become repetitive after a while
- not many different male actors (for those who care about them)
- need of getting used to the looks of some actresses, but matter of personal taste
- older content does not have the same amount of different quality choices
- some actresses, even with a lot of good will, do not qualify as 'teen'
Bottom Line:
We are looking at a themed site from the vast, content-rich and sometimes overly complex network of 21Sextury-sites. With signature websites such as assholefever.com, dpfanatics.com, analteenangels.com and lately gapeland.com, this network, as you as the porn geek of course are well aware of, for some years now sets the standard for high quality European porn.
Does this niche site live up to this reputation? Yes and no. Looking at it from a solo-site point of view, you get a nice mix of different and sometimes well known models who perform professional porn scenes (at least no amateur-faking for the most part) of highest technical standards. On the downside, the scene's setups are more than repetitive and iterative, there are no surprises, except maybe the question whether there will be anal sex or not (if you did nor care to study the scene's specifics before).
At the date of this review, we are looking at 233 scenes (with weekly updates coming) of the "old and young"-niche, as the title of the site already tells you, we are solely concentrating on the "old male, young female"-aspect. The vast majority are straight sex one-on-one scenes (15 of 233 anal; only 3 of 233 w/DP).
On the strong side, you fully benefit from 21Sextury's latest network design with fairly well working filters, search features and all kinds of fancy things you might want to wish for (or at least had wished for in the past).
Talking tech and specifics, the numbers are rock solid as expected:
Videos come in three different qualities for streaming and even six different qualities for download (older scenes might have fewer options). Formats are MP4 and WMV and the newer "Full HD"-scenes feature a screen resolution of rocking 1920x1088 px. File sizes vary between 200MB and 1GB. All videos are (still and for whatever good reason) optionally accessable as split parts of approx. 2 minutes.
Every scene features an own photo shooting with pro-shots in two different resolutions (standard with 1.200 px on the long side and HQ with 4.000+ px on the long side) and *of course* are those shootings available as zipped folders.
Bottom line
-----------
If you are into this niche, this site alone sets some sort of standard for what you are looking for.
As a part of a growing network of 40+ HQ-sites, it's a nice addition to the mix.
You do not ever will have to worry about lack of content or bad-quality videos, that's for sure.
So it's actually quite a challenge to name a few things on the downside because as a part of a network, you might as well say 'so what, then I just leave this one out and have fun with 30 other sites!'. True. However, if you *do* care about this niche, you might want to see a little bit more diversity in scene setups and storylines. Some actresses would not necessarily qualify as "top looking" but then again, the beauty lies in the eye of the beholder (and I drop five bucks into the money box for overused empty phrases).
----
Recommended.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
*Hi-Res video (1280 x 720)
*Complete Video Downloads (~500MB) and Clips
*No DRM
*50+ Exclusive Videos (57 at review)
*Matching Photosets w/ Zip Downloads for Newer Videos
*Models pushing 40 years old (not just past 30) - some past 40!
*Videos feature back stories
*Good lighting, many positions, almost always end in facials
*Bonus streaming DVD content (up to 2MB/s) by Adult Rental VOD
Cons:
*No Search Engine
*Videos use too much compression (visible dithering)
*Weekly Updates
*AdultFriendFinder Ads
*Most models have breast implants
*Mediocre lighting on videos prior to April, 2007
Bottom Line:
CougarsInHeat.com is the first high-quality MILF site that features true mature women – most of the women are closer to 40 than 30 – and almost all play the experienced older woman role convincingly. The site’s emphasis on the Cougar stereotype makes it a better MILF site than many of the more famous sites out there.
Almost all of the models have breast implants unfortunately, but strangely it fits with the characters well. Each video has a definite back story that the actors stay true to throughout each scene. The play-acting really set this site apart from the rest – enhancing the Cougar / MILF fantasy that the site is presenting.
The video is indeed high quality – but the compression is a little too high, so high action parts of the video show significant dithering and blocky-ness. The newer videos also have matching photos that feature both soft-core and hard-core sets downloadable as Zips as well as video caps for easy previewing of the video.
The site literally consists of one long page featuring a photo of each model as she appears in each video – this makes navigation slightly daunting, but once you are on the video’s own page it is extremely well organized. However the AdultFriendFinder ads are prevalent throughout the site and frankly an annoying presence on a pay site.
Due to the high quality content and the slow update rate - I recommend subscribing once a year for a month. Get the new content, cancel and then return again next year.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ $3 for a 3 day full access trial membership through TBP
+++ Lots of actual American MILFs (no 25 yr olds)
++ Lots of good hardcore action
++ Multiple viewing and DL options for vids plus all vids have accompanying screen cap shots.
++ Exclusive content.
+ Each set has a softcore photo shoot (no softcore vids though)
+ No DRM or DL limits, supports DL manager
+ About 175 scenes, all with pics and vids
+ No watermarks on pics or vids.
+ Pic size comes in at 1600 x 1070, all have zips
+ Good DL speeds (500 to 700 KB/sec for me)
+ Updates are dated so you if you rejoin later you know where to start.
+ No cross sales on sign-up
Cons:
--- Down to 1 update a month.
-- Most every scene is shot the same (especially the pics), it gets repetitive.
-- HD videos aren't HD and the best "non HD" files still come out blurry when viewed full screen.
-- No scene tags or real search function.
- Many of the video trailers for the sets don't work.
- Photo closeup shots are out of focus on body parts (get a camera man who knows how to shoot stills).
- About half the models have boob jobs.
- No model directory or model info.
- Bonus sites didn't work for me.
- Advertising on main page.
- Navigation needs some work.
- Canceling membership a bit of a pain.
Bottom Line:
It's just about time for hunting season around here so thought I try a change of pace and check out some cougars on the prowl. What you get here is actual cougar material (women in their 30's to 50's) with the stretch marks, wrinkles and the occasional hairy bush pouncing on younger porn dudes for some basic sex (no anal, toys or bizaare stuff). The price was right for the trial so I signed up and here's what you get:
PHOTOS: Best quality pics are 1600 x 1070 and each set has zips. Most scenes have about 120 to 150 HC pics. The lighting and production value is pretty good with minimal airbrushing. One beef I had was that on shots closer than full body, something is always out of focus ... get a better camera or someone who knows how to use it. The softcore sets had more pictures than the HC and they're pretty good, no toys used - just posing, gradually stripping and maybe some fingering. For those who like older women stripping and posing, this would be a good site to try. My biggest complaint here is that every freakin' set is shot the same. Couple fully clothed, cougar gets half undressed for sex on back, side and cowgirl. Girl gets naked for reverse cowgirl and doggie. Every set, every time. Apparently imagination is not one of this site's strong suits. There are screen caps for each scene too.
VIDEOS: Lots of viewing options, DL in different sizes, stream in different speeds with the inscreen browser or one of yours, and there's an i-pod option too. The problem here is that even though I have a small computer screen, even at full screen only the "HD" vids weren't grainy. The best nonHD vids come in at about 300 mb for a 30 minute video so you can see why. The HD is good but it's not true HD, just big files (1.5 gigs for a 30 min. vid) and the HD only is available in the MP4 format. DL speeds were good. Many of the trailers for the vids didn't actually show the vid so that's a bit of a pain. The vid production was pretty good with only a few sets having the annoying cameraman yakkin' it up.
THE REST: No model info or directory. Navigation is a bit of pain, lots of forward and back clicking and it took a few minutes to figure out the DL functions. The site itself is pretty plain. The bonus sites didn't work but that maybe because I was on a trial membership. Updates have really slowed but the quality of the material is generally pretty good. The advertising is on the main pages or at the bottom of the screen but it's not overly annoying.
I can't really give this site more than an 80 because of the lack of updates, nonHD HD vids, repetitive nature of the shots, search and navigation issues, and some other minor stuff. If you're into actual cougars getting it on (or posing for pics) then I'd recommend the trial. The regular price of $30 a month is too much and unless you have a slow connection you should be able to grab all you want within the trial time.
Now, how come I never meet these women in real life?
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Lots of videos.
UK girls.
Plenty of hardcore sex.
Really fast downloads.
Cons:
Some video quality is poor.
Girls not always amateurs.
Bottom Line:
I like this site. It has over 100 full length videos oand a good majority of them are good solid hardcore, with plenty of sex, usually one on one, but sometimes threesomes. Lots of different positions are tried. They virtually all feature older guy Freddie, a sex obsessed British bloke who loves picking up girls and taking them back to his place. My only complaint is that some of the films cut off too quickly at the end; one even ends before the guy has finished coming!
They are filmed in a cheesy style which is quite funny at times, but can grate after a while, especially when you see that the "amateur" that is being picked up on the sea front is a porn star you have seen in a load of other films. Thankfully, there were also quite a few girls I hadn't seen before.
The videos are of varying quality. Some are very poor; for instance there are a couple of videos that are filmed in bright sunlit rooms and you can barely see what is going on. Some are the opposite and are too dark, but overall the quality is ok.
Downloads were really fast, which is a pleasant change. I got 800kb/sec pretty much all the time, which is excellent. As the videos were only available to download in one file, this was very important.
I would recommend this site to fans of British girls.
Was a member approx. 6 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-RON JEREMY!!!
-A-1 quality MPEG & WINDOWS media formatting
-56 video/picture sets
-Geriatric theme A new twist.
-Bonus access to PORN PROS network
Cons:
-Updates slower than a chess game at the Special Olympics.
-Old guys aren't really that old.
-Same cast over and over and over...and over.
-Prevalent amount of pitches for other porn sites(or in English...too many fucking advertisements)
Bottom Line:
Some young girls prefer to have their first sexual liaisons with older, more experienced men who are wise in the ways of the world.The very thought of getting broken in by some gawky, acne riddled,two pump teenage chump is horror enough to make any girl want to join the convent and renounce sex.The teen tramps at JURASSIC COCK have taken the May-December romance conundrum one step further and set their sights on penises attached to men old enough to have been present at the invention of fire.The old dogs at JURASSIC COCK have some new tricks to teach these scrumptious young sex kittens.
Porn legend Ron Jeremy leads this cast of dirty old men as they get every last drop of their cocks milked by A pack of ripe & ready juvenile jezebels.These long in the tooth beau hunks bend,twist,and pound those tight young pussies until they're as supple as A jar of play-doh.
The rest of the cast is made up of such tantalizing porn tarts as LEXI DIAMOND,TANNER MAYES,and TESSA TAYLOR.They purr,coo,and moan as they take these geezers fossilized fuck wands in every possible hole.The old fogey's at JC are taking these bitches to school!
You have to take JURASSIC COCK with A grain of salt.The story lines are inane if not completely ludicrous.As in most skin flicks,the acting is atrocious and borders on down right embarrassing.The stunt cocks in these videos are in their mid to late 50's.Hardly what I would consider Jurassic.It would've been much more sick & depraved to watch these bimbos get worked over by some decrepit ass mummy looking mother fuckers than these middle aged pretenders.
All in all I think this is A funny twist on the regular old teen genre.If you're A dirty old man looking to live vicariously through RON JEREMY and the rest of this gang of grandpas,then the price is reasonable enough to not eat away your whole social security check.The bonus sites included in the PORN PROS package is worth the price alone.Whoever said retirement had to be A drag obviously has never seen JURASSIC COCK.STEVEN SPIELBERG and his CGI dinosaurs ain't got nothing on this site!
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Lots of content to see with a variety of different options for different tastes. There are a number of 'bonus sites' that seem to be from the same company under different names. Because of the bonus sites and being the same company some of the same scenes will be found on other sites which is nice because of what will be listed in the con.
Cons:
As noted above it seems to be one big company with different 'bonus sites'. But each site is a little bit different and when viewing the pictures some sites are extremely annoying while others are quite nice. For example, on Hot60plus, it only shows 8 pictures at a time and the pictures are essentially video frames so it takes forever to get through. But on other sites it is a page with 60+ pictures (still video frames) allowing for much better viewing. Also, I had difficulty with the flash player working properly, but that may have been on my end and not theirs so take that con with a grain of salt.
Bottom Line:
I would recommend the site with some reservations. Make sure you understand what you're getting into. I agree with this websites review of hot60, that you can get through most of the content you will be interested in in a month, 2 at most.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Zip downloads of photosets
- Action in the scenes was hot
- No DRM/download limit
- Decent amount of content
Cons:
- Videos are just average quality
- Older videos are much lower in quality
- There are a few non-exclusive(obviously) old dvd scenes mixed in
- Most of the "teens" don't look like teens at all
- A little bit on the pricey site
- Photos are average too
Bottom Line:
Basically in each scene you'll see 2 female pornstars, one older and one younger, fucking and sucking 1 dude with older lady taking the lead. mbaya's description of the scenes is still accurate. The scenes are not usually mother and daughter like you might expect. They get a little more creative. Maybe the moms didn't quite look old enough, but my problem was with the "teens." From the preview pics it wasn't always obvious who the mom was and who the teen was. Here's a tip, if one of them has pigtails she is the teen, and if one of them has glasses and wears stockings she is the mom. They could have gotten younger women. I've seen enough girls who look like they could be 18 in porn to know that they exist. Currently there are 190 scenes and updates come once a week. The content seems exclusive, but some scenes were clearly from DVD's that feature teens and MILFs.
When it comes to the videos you can download 2 qualities of wmv and one mpg. All movies have full scene downloads and split clips. The top quality vids are 640x480 2000kbps. They look about average. They should think about offering HD immediately.
There are photos to go along with each scene. These photos are average quality too. They are 800x1200. Zip downloads are available for all sets now.
Joining gives you access to a few bonus sites, some are decent, but some look like they consist of old dvd scenes. They are the 8 other sites listed in this company's profile. As you can see many focus on dildos. There are also some bonus feeds and videos, but nothing to write home about.
The site was enjoyable to me and I'm glad I joined. I found quite a few of my favorite MILF pornstars in there. The quality needs to improve if they are going to charge $30. I might recommend this site if you like this whole teen and MILF on 1 guy and you don't mind the quality.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Attractive euro women
-Reasonably well filmed scenes
-No DRM
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)
-Looks to be all original content
-Scenes have a "plot" to some extent
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn't look as good as the specs might suggest.
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps. I don't have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
Cons:
-Poor navigation
-Logins timeout relatively fast
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.
-Some sets don't have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don't have zips.
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are "high")
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
Bottom Line:
The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies. Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content. The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name. A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes. The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page. Pretty much nothing else.
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd. Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else. This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can't comment on that. There is no user forum or anything of that nature.
I actually very much liked the bonus content. Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues. Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche). The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn't make it worth the price for me. If you like to see "attractive men" in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Great quiality video, pictures and production, at least lately
-230 scenes with a weekly update guarantees you don't run out of material too fast
-Over 70 of the scenes are FullHD
-Very good looking European and Russian models
-Grandpas are not too old lately
-No limits or DRM, very fast downloads. Comes as a part of a large and cheap network
Cons:
-Quite vanilla action with little special themes or even anal and such. It's the age difference that is the only specialty here
-Some scenes are ruined (at least to me) by the hairy, overweight "grandpas"
-Due to the different membership packages this might be only a bonus site after two months to some
Bottom Line:
I guess these old/young, MILF and other sites featuring elderly people are either loved or hated by the most. While MILF's seem to start from anywhere around 25 years and up, this site features men that appear to be in their 50's and 60's. Mostly they don't look too old to really disturb me and sometimes they are even the same guys that appear on the other sites of this network like Zoliboy. The female talent is the same standard as rest of the sites meaning very good in my books.
There's a lot of content on this site, few hundred sites with most of it either FullHD or the standard HD resolution. Quality is very good and after the photo sets were enhanced to high definition, there really isn't much to complain about.
Action could be a bit harder in my opinion but since this is a niche site, I understand their style well. It's dedicated to what the name implies and that's it.
My average score should be taken with the fact that this is not really my favorite content. For me the girls save a lot in most scenes but some just don't make it. If you are into this age difference thing, you can easily add 10-15 points. Without wanting to sound sexist or ageist, I must admit that this setting works much better for me than the opposite. There are actually multiple sites dedicated to old ladies in this network (way older than your average adult entertainment MILF). I just cannot bring myself to get deep enough into those sites to write a review ;)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Mostly attractive mature women.
Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.
Videos can be streamed.
Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.
Updates are regular.
Cons:
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.
Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.
If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.
Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.
Bottom Line:
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.
I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.
The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.
In one scene, for instance, a “cougar” is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.
In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised “young” man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.
Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.
One other thing that bothers me is that the “boys” are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.
Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)
General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.
Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to “Stunning Matures.”
As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Real bargain at $15.00. Many of the women are attractive, popular and seen on other sites. Newer vids and pictures are very good quality. A few episodes have been shared with other sites.
Large number of links to other sites, and an amusing game of strip poker. One scene with Nicky is memorable and worth looking at often.
Cons:
Older vids are of lesser quality. Some of the linked sites do not respond easily and skip or flutter as they are played. Not much head provided, and much of the sex is by the numbers, fondle, sniff, suck, lick, and then fuck in three positions only. Some models seem bored and do little to draw attention to their scenes.
Bottom Line:
Can't go wrong for $15.00. Updates are slow, but keep coming. Quality of newer vids and pictures is very good. Models are, for the most part, attractive, even though some of them look less than enthusiastic.
Overall, for the low price and the wide range of choices offered, this is a bargain.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Updated:
11-22-1001:50pm (Update History) Reason: I forgot to add the bonus site info
Pros:
-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.
-They have some super cute teen girls.
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.
-They currently have over 300 videos.
-Bonus site included with membership.
-You can use a download manager.
-They appear to still be updating but since they don't date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.
-There is some scenario to the scenes.
Cons:
-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.
-Little to no model info means you'll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it's not worth bothering with.
Bottom Line:
-This site has the potential to be in the high 80's and even in the 90's but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index. If they are able to do that then I'd gladly return more often.
I wasn't thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score. It's till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it's basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it's at least 2 girls with one guy. The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info. They currently have over 40 videos. You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time. Oldje should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get over 135 videos going back to December of '03, most with a "mom" and a "friend", but some occasionally have more than one girl
-Each video comes with a picture set and since '05 they have been real digital shots with zip downloads at two different quality settings
-If you enjoy mature pornstars who are glam and not amateur, this site may be just the thing you're looking for
-Included with the site is full network access to Naughty America's 10 "Tier 1" sites all for under $25 a month
Cons:
-The scenarios are incredibly lame and the acting is absolutley terrible with little variation from one vid to the next
-Most of the "Moms" are pornstars way past their prime and I doubt any of them were someone's mom when they were filmed
-The highest kbps of the oldest videos (WMVs) is around 750 and they've only offered 1000 and 2000kbps since sometime in March of '07
-Before the end of '05 all pic sets are vidcaps and only offer zip options intermitently with no apparent rhyme or reason
Bottom Line:
This is the third site I'd reviewed for the Naughty America network and probably the last I specifically wanted to see. While I had mixed reviews on the first two, I was happy with the video quality. Unfortunately, that takes a real turn for the worse here.
The site offers over 135 videos that are "Mom" themed, but besides that use the same lame scripts as the other network sites. Basically, you have a mother who somehow runs into her son's best friend and through the miracle of reality porn they end up having sex.
The site appears to have started around the end of '03, but until the middle of '05 most pics sets are vidcaps without zip options and it's amazing to see what passed for "high quality" just 4 years ago. Until the last few months, the highest quality setting for the WMV files was around 750kbps, but is now as high as 2000kbps. Those newer vids are pretty good quality, but the previous lower resolution WNV files are very fuzzy and the MPEGs are even worse.
I wasn't cracked up about the first two network sites I reviewed and am even less so with this one. The scenes all seem to have been written and filmed by someone's 13 year old brother and with many performers repeating (some as many as 7 times) it just never allows you to escape into the fantasy. If you want quick sex scenes with young guys and aged pornstars this is your lucky day. If you didn't get full network access I'd say pass because this one definitely misses the mark and not by a small margin.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Billing through CCBILL.
-Great price through TBP.
-Decent size video collection. Presently have 157 videos.
-Videos have a choice as to WMV and MPG and can be downloaded as clips or the whole video.
-The models were more attractive than what I expected. Mostly nice bodies with big boobs. Some fake, some real.
-Part of a network of 14 sites.
-Bonus online video strip poker.
-Links for CCBill and customer support on the first webpage. They welcome comments and suggestions.
Cons:
-Too many bleach blonds.
-Not enough variety in the models. They had two Asians, but not other ethnicities.
-Not enough variety in the sex. Every video follows the same order and is predictable.
-No update schedule. They are not updating this month, but looking at older reviews I can see that they have added some new material this year.
-MPEG1 videos.
-The pictures are low quality screenshots.
-No zip downloads for the photos.
-Very annoyingly promised what they did not deliver. See below.
Bottom Line:
The site mostly has older pornstars that I saw years ago. They still have it in most cases, having a lot of experience and most still have sexy bodies. They do know what they are doing when it comes to sex, much better than sites that have cute first timers or amateurs. This surprised me as I have never been into MILF material, but this was fairly good (not great). The quantity is certainly adequate, but the video quality is not even remotely close to DVD or HD. The site promises "100% real homemade video footage" and "it's all real here". This is obviously not true, but the site does have enough to satisfy members.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
LG in itself stays pretty true to it's niche, all the women are either definitely old or at least getting up there.
Cons:
LG and it's network of sites have a rule set so you have to wait a certain amount of days to access parts/vids on recent updates.
For example if a new update comes out, you will only be able to download the 1st part of the vid on that day, and then the next consecutive part the following days. Usually if you want to download the whole movie you the site will bar you for a week or more, as it slowly unlocks the previous individual parts of the movie.
It's basically a strategy to make the truly desperate keep shelling out money.
Bottom Line:
If you like porn and don't mind being a paying member for a length of time, it can be a good site/network.
But if you're in any kind of a hurry, unless you haven't been a member for a long time, and know there is plenty of older stuff on it you want, you might wanna look elsewhere for mature/granny porn.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Interesting niche, exclusive content
- Decent video quality
- Seems to be growing fairly steadily, with a good number of videos now available for viewing
Cons:
- Too expensive for a site that doesn't allow downloads and has only limited photos
- Same models often appear in multiple scenes
- Optional token payment system for viewing not worth the cost
Bottom Line:
Could be a great site if they'd allow downloads, add some photo content and lose the token payment system.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All exclusive material.
-They update with 2-3 new videos each month.
-A very good selection of Eastern Europeans teen girls.(most are well know porn performers)
-There is a little scenario with a much older teacher coercing the teen into having sex with him.
-Photosets can be viewed online or downloaded as a complete set in zip format (1200x800).
Cons:
-There is only one video download option (WMV) and no choice in the possible resolution.
-The dialogue is all in Russian and that's too bad because it would add a major element to the scenes.
-They could use a little more foreplay with some added kissing between the players.
-It would be nice if they gave the players the correct name and even more so if they gave her the same one for all of their sites.
-They have a search by model option but because of the above issue with names then I wonder why they offer it.
Bottom Line:
-This is probably the one site in this network that has the potential to be much better and I don't think they need to make too many changes for that to happen.
They could offer some English dialogue or at the very least subtitles so that we can get into the little scenarios. As it is you can only guess at what is said(unless you speak Russian) and please make sure that the same model doesn't have a different names from site to site.
-If you like the older/younger fetish and can overlook the Russian dialogue then you should enjoy this site.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All exclusive.
-Over 150 videos.
-Most of the models appear to be unknows rather than professionals so this adds an amateur feel to the videos.
-They update with one new video a week.
Cons:
-Many of the scenes lack decent lighting so the action is often hard to see properly.
-The scenes star almost exclusively Freddie so that can be a plus if you enjoy him and major negative if he annoys you.
-I found that the same performers are in too many videos.
-Navigation on the site is annoying because you can only move forward or backward by scolling one page at a time and no way to skip a page or pages. That's a pian when you want to see the updates on page 15 because you'll still have to scroll through the first 14.
Bottom Line:
-This is a simple site of a an older gentleman who has sex with a variety of women ranging in age from late teens to early 40's and films it for us to see. The camera angles aren't too bad and the action is pretty good. The only thing that hurts this site is that the lighting could be better but I guess you'd lose the amateur feel to some of the scenes.
The other big thing that hurts it is the fact that too many of the videos star the same 2 women
Angel and Tracy Lain.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- around 59 videos, photos and screencaps in wmv and mpg (both around 512x288) as well as ipod, psp and xbox formats. Images can be downloaded as zips and are roughly around 850px × 566px.
- Download speed was around 700kb-3mb for 2 videos
- hot teens, who seem to have fun while shooting the scenes. Also most of the older gentlemen are not 80 year old's that couldn't hold a hard-on, they look around 40-50 and very capable of having a good sex session.
- most scenes have a bit of a story behind them. This teen is working as a mechanic, the other one is a nurse. The acting is not amazing but, as with most sites in this network, it's funny. I remember one scene where the horny gardener pops up at the window while the girl is having and interview. She tries to hush him away but they end up having sex...random, unbelievable but amusing and maybe a bit kinky...
- the site is updated every two weeks on Mondays
- access to the whole porn pros network which has many similar videos.
Cons:
- site pages load slowly, (not always and without any apparent pattern. Images that won't load one day will load the next)
- ads on pages (sometimes annoying other times can be ignored, depends what add loads)
- couldn't figure out the streaming player. It works on every other site out there except this one.
- content can get a bit repetitive
Bottom Line:
Overall the casting choices of this site are good: hot teens and old guys who sometimes are also famous (Ron Jeremy is in there). The scenes are fun and well shot with a good combination of close-ups and far shots.
However unlike other sites in the porn pass network this one doesn't have that much content to offer. 59 videos is enough to keep one busy but not for a long while, especially considering that there are only a limited number of male models.
The stories make the whole site more interesting and I found it amusing to see how one girl's solution to a man having a heart attack was to give him a blow-job, but in all honesty it's up to you if the stories work or not.
If you like cheesy porn plots that are funny and not that well acted than this is the site for you. However if you want more realistic scenes or scenes where the girls don't want to have sex, this is not a good place to look for it. All girls are willing and many initiate the sex, not your regular old man corrupting young innocents here. In fact I believe in at least 3 videos the case is the other way around. the teen is in some sort of trouble so she seduces the older man into having sex...
The bottom line is that I enjoyed the scenes here but I wouldn't have joined this site it was on it's own. with the whole network behind it yes, but only because (sometimes) I enjoy cheesy porn plots and hot, teenager-looking girls that are willing to have sex and take the initiative.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of large network of 17 sites. 15 focus on mature women.
-No download limit.
-Most recent updates are WMV 1280x720, 4730kbps. Very sharp and appear to be DVD like in quality.
-Can download as clips or as whole videos. Streaming is also an option. With slow downloads and each scene going over 1GB, I used the clip option.
-At the moment there are 172 videos as well as the same number of photosets. Most recent photo updates are 1260x1890, over 400kb. Very clear and crisp.
-Natural looking women that appear to be amateurs.
Cons:
-Mostly plain, some even unattractive women, both for the younger ones as well as the older.
-Cannot use download managers.
-The network is very expensive.
-Irregular updates. They seem to be about weekly though. For 2010 there are 17 so far.
Bottom Line:
This is part of a network that specializes in mature women. I mean mature, like at least 50. Some are even in their 70s. These are not your standard MILFS in age or appearance and is definitely not for everyone. I expect younger PUers would feel they were watching their grandmothers.
Even the youngest of the older women here look worn and aged. It is obvious that they don't take care of themselves as well as those you would find on most sites that focus on older women. Not cute.
The younger women don't always look their reported ages either. Natural is the word here, not made up or attempting to look younger than their actual age.
As far as the sex, it often is done without any chemistry. In all fairness though, sometimes it may be surprisingly hot. I expect the older women to get excited about the prospect of sex with the younger ones. Sometimes the better scenes truly get going with the younger ones seeming to go with the spirit of things quite enthusiastically.
The sex is both soft, with a lot of touching and licking, as well as harder using a variety of toys. In the scenes that did not work for me, the younger women didn't go down on the older ones. They seem to get them off manually or with toys though.
The only site I have ever been a member of that had scenes that could be compared was momsteachingteens.com. Although that site has mostly scenes of older and younger women sharing a man, there are about two dozen lesbian scenes as well. There you get much more attractive women, both younger and older. The sex is also much hotter as well. Another difference is that those scenes seemed like slick standard gonzo nd these feel very unrehearsed and real. Nothing slick here.
Overall my impression is of a site that is a niche wtihin a niche. I thought some scenes were very hot, but mostly they were just ok. While I don't care for the glam porn look, it is just difficult to get into scenes featuring women that didn't age well.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
